ACLS Annual Report 2005-2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2018 OAH ANNUAL REPORT 4 Table of Contents Table of Table of Contents
Annual Report ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS 2018 Building a Strong Community of Historians Organization of American Historians® FY2017–18 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Organization of American Historians© The report covers OAH activities and initiatives from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 (FY2017–18). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopied, recorded, or other means without prior written permission from the Organization of American Historians, 112 North Bryan Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47408. Phone: 812.855.7311. Web: oah.org. First edition: January X, 2019. 2 ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS Annual Report July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 3 2018 OAH ANNUAL REPORT 4 Table ofTable Contents Table of Contents Year-In-Review FROM OAH PRESIDENT EARL LEWIS 7 Organizational Review FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KATHERINE M. FINLEY 9 Financial Overview TREASURER’S REPORT AND EXCERPTS FROM AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM JAY GOODGOLD 11 Membership Overview RENEWAL, RECRUITMENT, AND BENEFITS 17 Lectureship Program PROGRAM OVERVIEW 19 OAH-NPS Collaboration PROGRAM OVERVIEW 21 International Residency PROGRAMS OVERVIEW 23 Publications Overview JOURNAL, MAGAZINE, AND BLOG 25 Meetings Overview 2018 OAH ANNUAL MEETING 27 2018 Awards and Prizes AWARDS AND PRIZES GIVEN IN 2018 31 Development & Philanthropy 38 Development & Philanthropy OAH DISTINGUISHED LECTURERS 41 2017–2018 Volunteer Leadership BOARDS AND COMMITTEES 43 2018–2019 Volunteer -
2016-2017 CCKF Annual Report
2016-2017 INTRODUCTION The Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange (the Foundation) was established in 1989 in memory of the outstanding achievements of the late President of the Republic of China, Chiang Ching- kuo (1910-1988). The Foundation’s mission is to promote the study of Chinese culture and society, as well as enhance international scholarly exchange. Its principal work is to award grants and fellowships to institutions and individuals conducting Sinological and Taiwan-related research, thereby adding new life to Chinese cultural traditions while also assuming responsibility for the further development of human civilization. Operational funds supporting the Foundation’s activities derive from interest generated from an endowment donated by both the public and private sectors. As of June 1, 2017, the size of this endowment totaled NT$3.62 billion. The Foundation is governed by its Board of Directors (consisting of between 15 and 21 Board Members), as well as 3 Supervisors. Our central headquarters is located in Taipei, Taiwan, with a regional office near Washington D.C. in McLean, Virginia. In addition, the Foundation currently maintains four overseas centers: the Chiang Ching-kuo International Sinological Center at Charles University in Prague (CCK-ISC); the Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation Inter-University Center for Sinology at Harvard University (CCK-IUC); the Chinese University of Hong Kong – Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation Asia-Pacific Centre for Chinese Studies (CCK-APC); and the European Research Center on Contemporary Taiwan – A CCK Foundation Overseas Center at Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (CCKF-ERCCT). There are also review committees for the five regions covering the geographic scope of the Foundation’s operations: Domestic, American, European, Asia-Pacific and Developing. -
Annual Report 2020 1
ACLS Annual Report 2020 1 AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LEARNED SOCIETIES Annual Report 2020 2 ACLS Annual Report 2020 Table of Contents Mission and Purpose 1 Message from the President 2 Who We Are 6 Year in Review 12 President’s Report to the Council 18 What We Do 23 Supporting Our Work 70 Financial Statements 84 ACLS Annual Report 2020 1 Mission and Purpose The American Council of Learned Societies supports the creation and circulation of knowledge that advances understanding of humanity and human endeavors in the past, present, and future, with a view toward improving human experience. SUPPORT CONNECT AMPLIFY RENEW We support humanistic knowledge by making resources available to scholars and by strengthening the infrastructure for scholarship at the level of the individual scholar, the department, the institution, the learned society, and the national and international network. We work in collaboration with member societies, institutions of higher education, scholars, students, foundations, and the public. We seek out and support new and emerging organizations that share our mission. We commit to expanding the forms, content, and flow of scholarly knowledge because we value diversity of identity and experience, the free play of intellectual curiosity, and the spirit of exploration—and above all, because we view humanistic understanding as crucially necessary to prototyping better futures for humanity. It is a public good that should serve the interests of a diverse public. We see humanistic knowledge in paradoxical circumstances: at once central to human flourishing while also fighting for greater recognition in the public eye and, increasingly, in institutions of higher education. -
Commission Members
Commission members Chair Orlando Taylor, VP Research and Dean of Graduate School, Howard University Rosio Alvarez, Exec. Director/Deputy CIO, Information Technologies, UMass Amherst Eduardo Bustamante, President, Student Government Association, UMass Amherst Joyce Bylander, Associate Provost, Campus Academic Life, Dickinson College Jules Chametzky, Professor Emeritus, English Dept., UMass Amherst Martha Escobar, Assistant Director of Undergraduate Admission, UMass Amherst Sidonio Ferreira, Assistant Dean, Support Services, UMass Amherst Ruth Ellen Fitch, President and Chief Exec. Officer, Dimock Community Health Ctr. Anne Herrington, Chair, Dept. of English, UMass Amherst Frances Degen Horowitz, President, The Graduate Center, City University of New York Bailey Jackson, Assoc. Professor, School of Education, UMass Amherst James Arthur Jemison Project Manager, Mass. Port Authority, UMass Amherst Alumnus Howard Johnson, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, Univ. of North Texas Earl Lewis, Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs, Emory University Pamela Marsh-Williams, Assoc. Dean, Undergraduate Advising, UMass Amherst Ernie May, Secretary of the Faculty Senate, Prof. of Music, UMass Amherst Mathew Ouellett, Assoc. Director, Center for Teaching, UMass Amherst Robert Ringel, Prof. of Audiology and Speech Sciences, Purdue University Vanessa Rivera, Asst. Dean for Student Affairs, College of Engineering, UMass Amherst Uri Strauss, President, Graduate Student Senate, UMass Amherst Ben Swan, 11th Hampden District State Representative (Springfield, MA) Carlos Vargas-Aburto, Provost and Vice Pres. for Academic Affairs, Central State Univ. Esther Terry, Ex-Officio, Associate Chancellor for EO&D, UMass Amherst Orlando L. Taylor is vice provost for research and dean of the graduate school at Howard University in Washington, D.C. He will chair the 22-member University of Massachusetts Commission on Campus Diversity. -
Book Spring 2006.Qxd
Pauline Yu Comparative literature in question Comparative literature is at once a subject butions to a substantial body of writings of study, a general approach to literature, a on the nature of comparative literature. series of speci½c methods of literary histo- As Weisinger and Joyaux suggest, ry, a return to a medieval way of thought, there has been scant consensus about a methodological credo for the day, an ad- the de½nition and purpose of the ½eld ministrative annoyance, a new wrinkle in from its very inception. Debates have university organization, a recherché aca- been waged about its name and what demic pursuit, a recognition that even to call those who practice it. Disputes the humanities have a role to play in the have swirled about whether or not their affairs of the world, close-held by a cabal, task is one of comparison. Questions invitingly open to all . 1 have been raised about whether or not whatever it is they do constitutes a disci- pline, producing delight, consternation, o begins the foreword to Herbert S or despair in the hearts of those who Weisinger’s and Georges Joyaux’s trans- care. Like the humanities as a whole, lation of René Etiemble’s The Crisis in comparative literature seems to face one Comparative Literature, published in 1966 ‘challenge’ after another and to exist in a and itself one of many polemical contri- state of perpetual ‘crisis,’ as even a quick glance at the titles of numerous works Pauline Yu, a Fellow of the American Academy on the subject can con½rm. -
Changing Approaches to Interpretation
CHANGING APPROACHES TO INTERPRETATION: TWENTIETH CENTURY RE-CREATIONS OF CLASSICAL CHINESE POETRY ROSLYN JOY RICCI 2006 Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts Chinese Studies Centre for Asian Studies School of Social Science University of Adelaide September 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PAGE ……………………………………………………………………………………………….....i TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………………………… ii ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………………………… iv DECLARATION …………………………………………………………………………………………….. v ACKOWLEDGENMENTS …………………………………………………………………………………. vi INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Plan and Problem …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Thesis and Questions ………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Significance ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Definitions of Terminology ………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Methodological Approach …………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Scope of Thesis ………………………………………………………………………………….................... 8 Context for Focus ……………………………………………………………………………………............ 9 Specific Tensions for the Genre ………………………………………………………………………….... 17 Anticipated Outcomes ……………………………………………………………………………………... 25 1 POUND AND WALEY: SETTING THE SCENE …………………………………………………….. 26 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 Pound: The Early Years …………………………………………………………………………………… 27 Waley’s Way ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 50 Comparative Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………… 61 Significant Influences ……………………………………………………………………………………… 70 Recapitulation ……………………………………………………………………………………………… -
The Heart of the Matter
american academy of arts & sciences The Heart of the Matter The Humanities and Social Sciences for a vibrant, competitive, and secure nation Who will lead America into a bright future? Citizens who are educated in the broadest possible sense, so that they can participate in their own governance and engage with the world. An adaptable and creative workforce. Experts in national security, equipped with the cultural understanding, knowledge of social dynamics, and language proficiency to lead our foreign service and military through complex global conflicts. Elected officials and a broader public who exercise civil political discourse, founded on an appreciation of the ways our differences and commonalities have shaped our rich history. We must prepare the next generation to be these future leaders. commission on the humanities and social sciences The Heart of the Matter american academy of arts & sciences Cambridge, Massachusetts © 2013 by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences All rights reserved. isbn: 0-87724-096-5 The views expressed in this volume are those held by the contributors and are not necessarily those of the Officers and Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. The Heart of the Matter is available online at http://www.amacad.org. Please direct inquiries to: American Academy of Arts & Sciences 136 Irving Street Cambridge, MA 02138-1996 Phone: 617-576-5000 Email: [email protected] www.amacad.org 5 Members of the Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences 6 Acknowledgments 9 Executive Summary 15 Introduction -
American Council of Learned Societies Annual Report 2004-2005
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LEARNED SOCIETIES Annual Report 2004–2005 ISSN 0065-7972 Annual Report 2004-2005 (October 1, 2004-September 30, 2005) copyright © 2006 American Council of Learned Societies American Council of Learned Societies Annual Report, 2004-2005 Contents Constituent Societies 1 Board of Directors 2 Investment Committee 2 Executive Committee of the Board 2 Associates of the ACLS 3 President’s Report 5 Current & Emerging Priorities 13 Liberal Arts Colleges & the Humanities 13 Report on Development 14 Individual Giving, 2004-2005 16 Fellowship Programs 21 ACLS Fellowship Program 21 ACLS/Social Science Research Council/ National Endowment for the Humanities International & Area Studies Fellowships 22 ACLS/New York Public Library Fellowships 22 Charles A. Ryskamp Research Fellowships 22 Frederick Burkhardt Residential Fellowships for Recently Tenured Scholars 23 ACLS Digital Innovation Fellowships 24 Henry Luce Foundation /ACLS Dissertation Fellowship Program in American Art 24 Contemplative Practice Fellowship Program 25 International Programs 26 ACLS Humanities Program in Belarus, Russia, & Ukraine 26 ACLS Committees on East European Studies & Language Training 27 New Perspectives on Chinese Culture and Society 28 Committee on Scholarly Communication with China 28 ACLS/Social Science Research Council International Program 29 Center for Educational Exchange with Vietnam 31 United States-Vietnam Liberal Arts Faculty Exchange Program 32 ACLS/SSRC Programs Administered by SSRC 33 Abe Fellowships 33 International Dissertation Field Research -
2009 ACLS Annual Meeting Attendees
2009 ANNUAL MEETING of the AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LEARNED SOCIETIES Philadelphia, May 7-9 Sheraton Society Hill Hotel PARTICIPANTS LIST ACLS fellows and grantees are designated in italics, with their award year(s). ACLS institutional Associates are designated in bold. I: Representatives of Constituent Societies: Members of the Conference of Administrative Officers and Delegates AFRICAN STUDIES ASSOCIATION CAO: Carol L. Martin, ASA, Rutgers University, New Brunswick Delegate: Bruce J. Berman, Queen's University, Canada AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Delegate: Thomas Bender, New York University AMERICAN ACADEMY OF RELIGION CAO: John R. Fitzmier, AAR, Emory University Delegate: W. Clark Gilpin, University of Chicago AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION CAO: William E. Davis III, AAA, Washington, DC Delegate: Don Brenneis, University of California, Santa Cruz AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY CAO: Paul J.Erickson, AAS, Worcester, MA Delegate: Scott E. Casper, University of Nevada, Reno AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SLAVIC STUDIES Delegate: Anthony Anemone, New School University AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE Acting CAO: Margaret Marsh, Rutgers University, Camden Delegate: Margaret E. Humphreys, F’04, Duke University AMERICAN COMPARATIVE LITERATURE ASSOCIATION CAO: Elizabeth Richmond-Garza, ACLA, University of Texas at Austin Delegate: Sandra L. Bermann, Princeton University AMERICAN DIALECT SOCIETY CAO: Allan A. Metcalf, ADS, MacMurray College Delegate: Richard W. Bailey, G’71, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION CAO: John J. Siegfried, AEA, Vanderbilt University Delegate: Charlotte V. Kuh, National Research Council of the National Academies ACLS Annual Meeting Participants, page 2 AMERICAN FOLKLORE SOCIETY CAO: Timothy Lloyd, AFS, Ohio State University Delegate: Lee Haring, City University of New York, Brooklyn College, Emeritus AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION CAO: Arnita A. -
Modal Translation of Substructural Logics
Modal Translation of Substructural Logics Chrysafis Hartonas Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Applied Sciences of Thessaly (TEI of Thessaly), Greece [email protected] December 18, 2018 Abstract In an article dating back in 1992, Kosta Doˇsen initiated a project of modal translations in substructural logics, aiming at generalizing the well- known G¨odel-McKinsey-Tarski translation of intuitionistic logic into S4. Doˇsen’s translation worked well for (variants of) BCI and stronger sys- tems (BCW, BCK), but not for systems below BCI. Dropping structural rules results in logic systems without distribution. In this article, we show, via translation, that every substructural (indeed, every non-distributive) logic is a fragment of a corresponding sorted, residuated (multi) modal logic. At the conceptual and philosophical level, the translation provides a classical interpretation of the meaning of the logical operators of various non-distributive propositional calculi. Technically, it allows for an effort- less transfer of results, such as compactness, L¨owenheim-Skolem property and decidability. Keywords: G¨odel translation, Substructural Logics, Resource Conscious Logics, Non-Distributive Logics, Representation of Lattice Expansions, Sorted Modal Logic 1 Introduction arXiv:1812.06747v1 [math.LO] 17 Dec 2018 In 1933, Kurt G¨odel published a paper [28] he had presented the year before in the Mathematics Colloqium in Vienna, chaired by his former teacher, Karl Menger. In his presentation and paper G¨odel proposed his well-known inter- pretation of Intuitionistic Logic (IL) into a certain modal extension of Classical Propositional Logic (CPL), now widely known as Lewis’s system S4. G¨odel proposed to translate every IL formula ϕ to an S4-formula ϕ◻ by prefixing a ◻ to every subformula of ϕ. -
REPORT of the ANDREW W. MELLON FOUNDATION 2013 00 77444 Mellon Covers 10/1/14 6:33 PM Page 2 01 77444 Mellon Front 10/1/14 6:35 PM Page 1
00_77444_Mellon_covers 10/1/14 6:33 PM Page 1 REPORT OF THE ANDREW W. MELLON FOUNDATION 2013 00_77444_Mellon_covers 10/1/14 6:33 PM Page 2 01_77444_Mellon_front 10/1/14 6:35 PM Page 1 The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Report from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 140 East 62nd Street, New York, New York 10065 (212) 838-8400 http://www.mellon.org 01_77444_Mellon_front 10/1/14 6:35 PM Page 2 01_77444_Mellon_front 10/1/14 6:35 PM Page 3 Trustees Chairmen Emeriti W. Taylor Reveley III, Chairman John C. Whitehead Danielle S. Allen Hanna H. Gray Lewis W. Bernard Anne M. Tatlock Richard H. Brodhead Katherine G. Farley Kathryn A. Hall Paul LeClerc Earl Lewis Glenn D. Lowry Eric M. Mindich Sarah E. Thomas Officers of the Corporation Earl Lewis, President John E. Hull, Financial Vice President and Chief Investment Officer Philip E. Lewis, Vice President Michele S. Warman, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Mariët Westermann, Vice President Program Officers Armando I. Bengochea William Robertson IV Helen Cullyer Eugene M. Tobin Susan Feder Donald J. Waters Alison Gilchrest Administrative Staff Vanessa Cogan, Database & Records Manager Oscar De La Cruz, Manager of Human Resources & Benefits Rebecca Feit, Assistant General Counsel Susanne C. Pichler, Librarian Finance and Investment Staff Thomas J. Sanders, Chief Financial Officer Christy Cicatello, Accounting Manager Michele M. Dinn, Senior Portfolio Manager Karen Grieb Inal, Senior Portfolio Manager Ann Siddiqui, Director of Investment Accounting Monica C. Spencer, Senior Portfolio Manager Abigail Archibald, Portfolio Manager Senior Advisors Hilary Ballon Stuart J. Saunders Hans Rutimann As of December 31, 2013 01_77444_Mellon_front 10/1/14 6:35 PM Page 4 01_77444_Mellon_front 10/1/14 6:35 PM Page 5 THE ANDREW W. -
1 the Idea of First-Degree Entailment
FIRST-DEGREE ENTAILMENT AND BINARY CONSEQUENCE SYSTEMS YAROSLAV SHRAMKO Department of Philosophy, Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, Kryvyi Rih, 50086, Ukraine [email protected] Abstract This paper presents an account of Belnap and Dunn’s logic of first-degree entail- ment and some related logics based on a proof-theoretic machinery of binary (FMLA- FMLA) consequence systems. It is shown how the logic of first-degree entailment can be represented by various deductively equivalent systems, up to a purely structural sys- tem with transitivity as the only inference rule. A family of possible extensions of this later system is represented in a systematic manner. This is a review article, which reca- pitulates certain recent advances in investigating the Belnap-Dunn logic, and organizes the corresponding material from a genuinely first-degree entailment perspective. Keywords: First-degree entailment, consequence system, binary consequence, logical frameworks, structural reasoning, super-Belnap logics 1 The idea of first-degree entailment The logic of first-degree entailment occupies an important place among modern non-classi- cal logics. As Hitoshi Omori and Heinrich Wansing put it: There is a continuum of nonclassical logics, but some systems have emerged as particularly interesting and useful. Among these distinguished nonclassical logics is a system of propositional logic that has become well-known as Belnap and Dunn’s useful four-valued logic or first-degree entailment logic, FDE. [25, p. 1021] The notion of first-degree entailment has been introduced by Nuel Belnap in his doctoral dissertation [5] (see also [25, p. 1021]), and put into circulation in a short abstract of his talk Vol.