DOCSLIB.ORG

103Age-Friendly-City-Amasya V2.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
103Age-Friendly-City-Amasya V2.Pdf “This report is prepared in scope of the “Age Friendly City Amasya” project with TR83/2011/DFD/004 reference number by Amasya University in the frame of 2011 direct operation support program held by Middle Black Sea Development Agency under the general coordination of T.R. Ministry of Development.” “AGE FRIENDLY CITY: AMASYA” Age Friendly City Amasya Title of the Project “Age Friendly City Amasya” Owner of the Project T.C. Amasya University Project Team Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ersoy Asst. Prof. Dr. Yaşar Bahri Ergen Asst. Prof. Dr. Okan Murat Dede Research Team / Contracter Company Vera Research (Vera Yönetim Danışmanlığı ve Eğitim Hiz. Tic. Ltd. Şti) Research Director: Atila Taş Operational Management: Gökhan Erbay Data Analysis Specialist: Akif Kara City and Region Planner: Cansu Yılmaz City and Region Planner: Mehmet Yılmaz Supporting Institution T.R. Ministry of Development and Middle Black Sea Development Agency “This report is prepared for Aged Friendly City Amasya Project which is promoted by Middle Black Sea Development Agency. Sole responsibility about the content belongs to Amasya University and do not represent the ideas of Middle Black Sea Development Agency.” Contact: T.R. Amasya University Address: Pirinççi Cad. No:50 Amasya Tel: (358) 218 01 60 Fax: (358) 218 01 04 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.amasya.edu.tr 2 Age Friendly City Amasya Content Preface .................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 15 1.1 Reason............................................................................................................................................. 15 1.2 Objective and Scope of the Project................................................................................................. 16 1.3 The Output of the Project ................................................................................................................ 17 2. Old Age And The Development Of “Age Friendly City” Concept ..................................................... 18 2.1 The concept of Old Age and Its Characteristics ............................................................................. 18 2.2 Increasing Old Population in Demographic Process and Results ................................................. 19 2.3 Approaches in the World about Old Age ...................................................................................... 21 2.4 Age Friendly City Concept .............................................................................................................. 22 2.5 Age Friendly Cities Checklist .......................................................................................................... 25 2.6 Ageing Process in Turkey ............................................................................................................... 29 3. General Characteristics Of Amasya .................................................................................................. 29 3.1 Geography ....................................................................................................................................... 30 3.2 History ............................................................................................................................................. 31 3.3 Climate............................................................................................................................................. 31 3.4 Demographic Structure ................................................................................................................... 32 3.5 Administration (Political Borders)................................................................................................... 34 3.5.1 Towns and Villages ...................................................................................................................... 34 3.5.2 Districts ........................................................................................................................................ 35 3.5.3 Quarters ........................................................................................................................................ 35 3.6 Socioeconomic Structure................................................................................................................ 36 3.6.1 Agriculture .................................................................................................................................... 36 3.6.2 Livestock ...................................................................................................................................... 37 3.6.3 Forestry ........................................................................................................................................ 38 3.6.4 Industry......................................................................................................................................... 38 3.7 Health Sector and Health Services.................................................................................................. 39 3.7.1 General Situation .......................................................................................................................... 39 3.7.2 Health Personnel .......................................................................................................................... 41 3.7.3 Pharmacies ................................................................................................................................... 41 3.7.4 Statistics for Health Institutions ................................................................................................... 42 3.7.5 Health facilities and Health Personnel ......................................................................................... 43 3.8 Transportation ................................................................................................................................. 43 3.8.1 Railroad ........................................................................................................................................ 44 3.8.2 Air Transport ................................................................................................................................ 44 3.8.3 Sea Transport ............................................................................................................................... 44 3.9 Housing Specifications ................................................................................................................... 44 3.10 Outdoor Areas, Recreational Areas and Historical Places ........................................................... 45 3.10.1 Amasya Castle and Rock Tombs ............................................................................................... 45 3.10.2 Medresas of Amasya .................................................................................................................. 46 3 Age Friendly City Amasya 3.10.3 Mosques and Social Complexes of Amasya .............................................................................. 48 3.10.4 Inns, Baths and Bazaars of Amasya........................................................................................... 49 3.10.5 Thermal Springs of Amasya ....................................................................................................... 51 3.10.6 Bird Observation Areas in Amasya ............................................................................................ 54 3.10.7 Museums and Historical Places in Amasya ............................................................................... 54 3.10.7.1 Museums.................................................................................................................................. 54 3.10.7.2 Historical Places ...................................................................................................................... 57 4. The Potential Of Amasya To Be An Age Friendly City...................................................................... 58 4.1 Age Friendly City Amasya Research............................................................................................... 58 4.2 General Objective of the Research ................................................................................................. 58 4.3 Specific Objective of the Research ................................................................................................. 58 4.4 Research Methods and Techniques................................................................................................ 58 4.5 Research Sampling ......................................................................................................................... 59 4.6 Sampling Details ............................................................................................................................. 59 4.6.1 Household Heads Sampling Details ............................................................................................. 59 4.6.2 Sampling Details for Individuals over Sixty Five (65) .................................................................. 64 4.7 Findings........................................................................................................................................... 69
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cultural Sustainability: Merzifon Anatolia College, Turkey Gizem Özerol1 , Aysu Akalın Abstract
    ARTICLE ISSN 2651 - 5210 MODULAR 2019;2(2):21-45 The Cultural Sustainability: Merzifon Anatolia College, Turkey Gizem Özerol1, Aysu Akalın2 Received: 19 November 2019 - Accepted: 17 December 2019 Abstract The article proposes an analysis of the role of American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM) during the late Ottoman and the early nationalist (Republican) Turkey and focusses especially on the ABCFM organization and the role of Protestant missionaries, which they succeeded in establishing autonomous schools, hospitals, clinics, orphanages, lodgings and ateliers not only in the capitals, but also in provinces. The American Board began evangelism among Armenians, and the education and the social services became part of the Protestant movement in the Near East. Following efforts to Christianize the nations through evangelism, in the mid of 19th century, Merzifon (Marsovan) province was chosen due to its location in the middle of Anatolia and Merzifon Anatolia College was designed as an important ‘station’ in order to support the American missionary movements. Then, between the years 1886 and 1938, ABCFM built strong connections with Anatolia College in Merzifon to gain a very important strategic position. In the context of the First World War, the function of the Anatolia College buildings has changed for different aims; the military used these buildings as the Artillery Regiment. After the war the ABCFM’s network broke down but its strong contribution to present education in Turkey is inevitable. The site as a heritage is still an active part of the city’s cultural life with some existing buildings of ABCFM supporting culture and education.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Turkish Indigenous Donkey Populations Determined by Mitochondrial DNA D-Loop Region
    animals Article Phylogenetic Relationships of Turkish Indigenous Donkey Populations Determined by Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Region Emel Özkan Ünal 1,* , Fulya Özdil 2,* , Selçuk Kaplan 3, Eser Kemal Gürcan 1, Serdar Genç 4 , Sezen Arat 2 and Mehmet Ihsan˙ Soysal 1 1 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Tekirda˘gNamık Kemal University, Tekirda˘g59030, Turkey; [email protected] (E.K.G.); [email protected] (M.I.S.)˙ 2 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Tekirda˘gNamık Kemal University, Tekirda˘g59030, Turkey; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tekirda˘gNamık Kemal University, Tekirda˘g59030, Turkey; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Kır¸sehirAhi Evran University, Kır¸sehir40100, Turkey; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.Ö.Ü.); [email protected] (F.Ö.); Tel.: +90-282-250-2185 (E.Ö.Ü.); +90-282-250-2233 (F.Ö.) Received: 25 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 27 October 2020 Simple Summary: This paper represents the first fundamental report of mtDNA diversity in Turkish indigenous donkey breeds and presents findings for the origin and genetic characterization of donkey populations dispersed in seven geographical regions in Turkey, and thus reveals insights into their genetic history. The median-joining network and phylogenetic tree exhibit two different maternal lineages of the 16 Turkish indigenous donkey populations. Abstract: In this study, to analyze the mtDNA D-loop region and the origin of the maternal lineages of 16 different donkey populations, and to assess the domestication of Turkish indigenous donkeys in seven geographical regions, we investigated the DNA sequences of the D-loop region of 315 indigenous donkeys from Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 15, No. 1, January 2020__________ 269 A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF LEAF-BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) IN TURKEY USING DATA OF SPECIMENS IN NAZİFE TUATAY PLANT PROTECTION MUSEUM (TURKEY, ANKARA) Hüseyin Özdikmen*, Neslihan Bal* and Didem Coral Şahin** * Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gazi University, 06500 Ankara, TURKEY. E- mail: [email protected]; [email protected] ** Directorate of Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Ankara, TURKEY. E-mail: [email protected] [Özdikmen, H., Bal, N. & Coral Şahin, D. 2020. A contribution to the knowledge of leaf-beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Turkey using data of specimens in Nazife Tuatay Plant Protection Museum (Turkey, Ankara). Munis Entomology & Zoology, 15 (1): 269-297] ABSTRACT: In this study, material belonging to nine subfamilies of Chrysomelidae housed in the collection of Nazife Tuatay Plant Protection Museum (NTM) (Turkey, Ankara) have been evaluated. A total of 121 species of 41 genera have been presented. Among those Smaragdina concolor concolor (Fabricius, 1792) and Podagrica malvae semirufa (Küster, 1847) are the first record for Turkey. Also, Labidostomis metallica metallica Lefèvre, 1872, Chrysolina anceyi anceyi (Marseul, 1868), Aphthona pallida (Bach, 1859) and Longitarsus callidus Warchałowski, 1967 are the second reports for Turkey. Additional new provincial and regional records for many species have been given. KEY WORDS: Fauna, Chrysomelidae, the leaf beetles, Turkey, biodiversity The Chrysomelidae fauna of Turkey has been studied by many foreign and native scientists. Recent studies of Löbl & Smetana (2010), Warchalowski (2010), Ekiz et al. (2013), Özdikmen (2014a,b), Özdikmen & Cihan (2014), Özdikmen & Kavak (2014), Özdikmen & Kaya (2014), Özdikmen & Mercan (2014), Özdikmen & Özbek (2014) and Özdikmen & Topcu (2014) have great importance for Chrysomelidae fauna of Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Merzifon-Suluova Basin, Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences (Turkish J. Earth Sci.),B. ROJAY Vol. 21, & 2012, A. KOÇYİĞİT pp. 473–496. Copyright ©TÜBİTAK doi:10.3906/yer-1001-36 First published online 25 January 2011 An Active Composite Pull-apart Basin Within the Central Part of the North Anatolian Fault System: the Merzifon-Suluova Basin, Turkey BORA ROJAY & ALİ KOÇYİĞİT Middle East Technical University, Department of Geological Engineering, Universiteler Mahallesi, Dumplupınar Bulvarı No: 1, TR−06800 Ankara, Turkey (E-mail: [email protected]) Received 26 January 2010; revised typescript receipt 13 December 2010; accepted 25 January 2010 Abstract: Th e North Anatolian Fault System (NAFS) that separates the Eurasian plate in the north from the Anatolian microplate in the south is an intracontinental transform plate boundary. Its course makes a northward convex arch- shaped pattern by fl exure in its central part between Ladik in the east and Kargı in the west. A number of strike-slip basins of dissimilar type and age occur within the NAFS. One of the spatially large basins is the E–W-trending Merzifon- Suluova basin (MS basin), about 55 km long and 22 km wide, located on the southern inner side of the northerly-convex section of the NAFS. Th e MS basin has two infi lls separated from each other by an angular unconformity. Th e older and folded one is exposed along the fault-controlled margins of the basin, and dominantly consists of a Miocene fl uvio- lacustrine sedimentary sequence. Th e younger, nearly horizontal basin infi ll (neotectonic infi ll) consists mainly of Plio– Quaternary conglomerates and sandstone-mudstone alternations of fan-apron deposits, alluvial fan deposits and recent basin fl oor sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Türkiye'de Yayiliş Gösteren Candelariella Türlerinin
    Doktora Tezi T.C. ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ ZekiyeKOCAKAYA FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ BİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI TÜRKİYE’DE YAYILIŞ GÖSTEREN CANDELARIELLA TÜRLERİNİN MORFO-ANATOMİK KARAKTERLERİ VE MULTİLOKUS MOLEKÜLER SEKANS ANALİZLERİ İLE MODERN REVİZYONU BİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI Hazırlayan Zekiye KOCAKAYA Danışman Doç. Dr. M. Gökhan HALICI Doktora Tezi Mart 2016 KAYSERİ 2016 T.C. ERCĠYES ÜNĠVERSĠTESĠ FEN BĠLĠMLERĠ ENSTĠTÜSÜ BĠYOLOJĠ ANABĠLĠM DALI TÜRKĠYE’DE YAYILIġ GÖSTEREN CANDELARIELLA TÜRLERĠNĠN MORFO-ANATOMĠK KARAKTERLERĠ VE MULTĠLOKUS MOLEKÜLER SEKANS ANALĠZLERĠ ĠLE MODERN REVĠZYONU Hazırlayan Zekiye KOCAKAYA DanıĢman Doç. Dr. M. Gökhan HALICI Bu çalıĢma; Erciyes Üniversitesi Bilimsel AraĢtırma Projeleri Birimi tarafından FDK-2014-5259 kodlu proje ile desteklenmiĢtir. Mart 2016 KAYSERĠ BİLİMSEL ETİGE UYGUNLUK Bu çalışmadaki tüm bilgilerin, akademik ve etik kurallara uygun bir şekilde elde edildiğini beyan ederim. Aynı zamanda bu kural ve davranışların gerektirdiği gibi, bu çalışmanın özünde olmayan tüm materyal ve sonuçları tam olarak aktardığımı ve referans gösterdiğimi belirtirim. Adı-Soyadı: İmza: II YÖNERGEYEUYGUNLUK Türkiye'de Yayılış Gösteren Candelariella Türlerinin Morfo-Anatomik Karakterleri ve Multilokus Moleküler Sekans Analizleri İle Modern Revizyonu adlı Doktora tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Tez Önerisi ve Tez Yazma Yönergesi'ne uygun olarak lıazırlanmıştır. Zeki ye KOCAKA YA Doç. Dr. M. Göklıan HALICI "l.~ Biyoloji ABD Başkanı Prof. Dr. Nusret AYYILDIZ III Doç. Dr. M. Gökhan HALICI danışmanlığında Zekiye KOCAKAYA tarafından hazırlanan "Türkiye'de Yaydış Gösteren Candelariella Türlerinin Morfo-Anatomik Karakterleri ve Multilokus Moleküler Sekans Analizleri İle Modern Revizyonu" adlı bu çalışma, jürimiz tarafından Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Biyoloji Anabilim Dalında Doktora tezi olarak kabul edilmiştir. 03/03/2016 JÜRİ: Danışman : Doç. Dr. Mehmet GÖKHAN HALICI .~ Üye : Prof. Dr. Ayşen ÖZDEMİR TÜRK ....~ Üye : Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabiha Gökçen's 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO ―Sabiha Gökçen‘s 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation Formation and the Ottoman Armenians A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Communication by Fatma Ulgen Committee in charge: Professor Robert Horwitz, Chair Professor Ivan Evans Professor Gary Fields Professor Daniel Hallin Professor Hasan Kayalı Copyright Fatma Ulgen, 2010 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Fatma Ulgen is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION For my mother and father, without whom there would be no life, no love, no light, and for Hrant Dink (15 September 1954 - 19 January 2007 iv EPIGRAPH ―In the summertime, we would go on the roof…Sit there and look at the stars…You could reach the stars there…Over here, you can‘t.‖ Haydanus Peterson, a survivor of the Armenian Genocide, reminiscing about the old country [Moush, Turkey] in Fresno, California 72 years later. Courtesy of the Zoryan Institute Oral History Archive v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………....
    [Show full text]
  • 13124132 Tantmrehberi.Pdf
    TRANSPORTATION RAILWAY T.C. Amasya is located on Sivas-Smasun Railroad, 261 km to Sivas and 134 km to Samsun. THE GOVERNORSHIPAMASYA VALİLİĞİ Within the city there are two terminals (Amasya and Hacıbayram) and six railroad OF AMASYA - TÜRKİYE stations (Kızılca, Kayabaşı, Eryatağı, Boğazköy, Suluova, Hacıbayram). The train and local Express schedules are as follows.) (Turkish Railways Phn: 218 12 39) Departure from Amasya Arrival in Samsun Departure from Samsun Arrival in Amasya Daily 04.55 08.02 18.00 21.00 Departure from Sivas Arrival in Amasya Departure from Amasya Arrival in Samsun Daily 08.50 14.21 14.25 17.24 Departure from Samsun Arrival in Amasya Departure from Amasya Arrival in Sivas Daily 08.20 11.32 14.25 16.50 Local Express Amasya-Samsun: Amasya, Boğazköy, Suluova, Hacıbayram, Bekdiğin, Havza, Ladik, Kavak, Çukurbük, Meşelidüz, Samsun. Departure from Amasya Arrival in Samsun Departure from Samsun Arrival in Amasya Daily 08.40 14.04 14.09 17.08 RAILBUS Departure from Amasya Arrival in Havza Departure from Havza Arrival in Amasya Daily 08.00 09.13 09.30 10.42 15.00 16.12 17.00 18.12 Departure from Amasya Arrival in Hacıbayram Departure from Hacıbayram Arrival in Amasya Daily 12.00 12.50 13.00 13.51 AIRWAYS MARITIME LINES Closest airport and seaports to Amasya are in Samsun, 130 km to Amasya Airways Phn: 0.358.535 10 16 - 1015 Maritime Lines Phn: 0.362.435 16 05 İstanbul-Merzifon Flight Hours TOURISTIC GUIDE Monday Departure from İstanbul Arrival in Merzifon Departure from Merzifon Arrival in İstanbul Wednesday Friday 16.40 18.10 19.10 20.25 FOR AMASYA Amasya is connected to the neighboring cities Samsun, Çorum and Tokat via the state highways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Genocide by Berkan Celebi - 18/12/2018 11:01
    www.theregion.org The forgotten genocide by Berkan Celebi - 18/12/2018 11:01 The Greek genocide in Turkey was the systemic genocidal campaign carried out by the Ottoman Empire but primarily by the militia movements, under the Turkish National Movement, which formed the Ottoman successor state; The Turkish Republic. The genocide occurred between the year 1914 to 1922 leading to the death of over 750,000 people. The genocide included campaigns of death marches, executions, massacres, the destruction of cultural and religious monuments, and ethnic displacement through means of destruction of homes and cities that were historically and demographically, Greek. An example would be the Catastrophe of Smyrna, today the city known as Izmir, which was the outbreak of a fire in the traditional Greek city begun by Turkish nationalist forces which led to the destruction of three-quarters of the city, its plunder and the death and rape of 10 to 100 thousand people. The remaining population had fled during the fire with an estimated 50 to 400 thousand people cramming into ports in order to flee as refugees whilst an estimated 100 thousand were killed in a subsequent death march from the city to Central Anatolia. Campaigns also included forced deportation such as in Samsun where looting, burning of settlements, rape, crucifixions of religious leaders and massacres had led a final forced death march killing the remaining Greek community within the city and those who had sought refuge in the city fleeing from other atrocious acts across the nation. An American relief worker noted that ‘‘Bodies lay along the roadside and in the fields everywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Ayyildiz, M.: the Thermal Power Plants with the Viewpoint Of
    Erdal et al.: The thermal power plants with the viewpoint of farmers: the case of Amasya Province - 645 - THE THERMAL POWER PLANTS WITH THE VIEWPOINT OF FARMERS: THE CASE OF AMASYA PROVINCE ERDAL, H.1 – ERDAL, G.2 – AYYILDIZ, B.3 – AYYILDIZ, M.3 1Department of Management and Organization, Social Sciences Vocational School, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey 2Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey 3Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] (Received 13th May 2019; accepted 30th Jan 2020) Abstract. Thermal power plants are facilities that convert the chemical energy of solid, liquid and gas fuels respectively into thermal, mechanical and electric energy. The presumption of establishing a fossil fuel plant on this fertile area is putting the security of the agricultural products of the area at risk. A face to face survey was carried out with the 90 of the farmers living close to the planned area for the establishment of the fossil fuel plant in Suluova county of Amasya province. According to the survey results 43% of the farmers stated that fossil fuel plant is a necessity but it should be established far away from the agricultural estates whereas 30% of them think that these kind of fuel plants should not be established on any account and 27% of them expressed no opinion about the issue. A total of 60% of the farmers think that the agricultural consequences of the planned fossil fuel plant are not considered adequately; and 73% of the farmers think that a presumed fossil fuel plant in the area will negatively affect the yield and the quality of the agricultural products and 56% say that the agricultural estates will be negatively affected by it.
    [Show full text]
  • Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1 Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
    Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1 Mustafa Kemal Atatürk Mustafa Kemal Atatürk [[file:MustafaKemalAtaturk.jpg alt=]] President Atatürk 1st President of Turkey In office 29 October 1923 – 10 November 1938 (15 years, 12 days) Prime Minister Ali Fethi Okyar İsmet İnönü Celâl Bayar Succeeded by İsmet İnönü 1st Prime Minister of Turkey In office 3 May 1920 – 24 January 1921 (0 years, 266 days) Succeeded by Fevzi Çakmak 1st Speaker of the Parliament of Turkey In office 24 April 1920 – 29 October 1923 (3 years, 219 days) Succeeded by Ali Fethi Okyar 1st Leader of the Republican People's Party In office 9 September 1923 – 10 November 1938 (15 years, 62 days) Succeeded by İsmet İnönü Personal details Born 19 May 1881 (Conventional. This date was adopted by the president himself for official purposes in the absence of precise knowledge concerning the real date.)Salonica, Ottoman Empire (present-day Thessaloniki, Greece) Died 10 November 1938 (aged 57)Dolmabahçe Palace Istanbul, Turkey Resting place Anıtkabir Ankara, Turkey Nationality Turkish Political party Committee of Union and Progress, Republican People's Party Spouse(s) Lâtife Uşaklıgil (1923–25) Religion See Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's religious views. Signature Military service Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 2 Allegiance Ottoman Empire (1893 – 8 July 1919) Republic of Turkey (9 July 1919 – 30 June 1927) Army Service/branch Rank Ottoman Empire: General (Pasha) Republic of Turkey: Mareşal (Marshal) Commands 19th Division – 16th Corps – 2nd Army – 7th Army – Yildirim Army Group – commander-in-chief of Army of the
    [Show full text]
  • A ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 626 Index A Anamur 388-90 tours 367-8 Columns of the Abana 501 Anatolia 287-322, 409-50, travel to/from 374 Evangelists 227 accommodation 590-2, see 517-54 travel within 375-6 Didyma 252-7, 263, 262 also individual locations accommodation 287, walking tours 372, 372 Elaiussa-Sebaste 393 409, 517 booking 111 Anzac Cove 157, 162 Ephesus 12, 24, central 409-50, 226-32, 233-4, 263, boutique hotels 28 410 Anzac Day 160 climate 287, 409, 517 573, 224, 13 costs 21, 111 Arasta Bazaar 133, 133 eastern 517-54, Eskişehir 305 discounts 264 518-19 archaeological sites & ruins Euromos 255 language 617-18 food 287, 409, 517 27, 262-3 Gate of Hadrian 230 activities 26-7, 37-41, see highlights 288, 306-7, Acropolis (Gordion) 423 410, 518 Göreme Open-Air also individual activities Adamkayalar 395 travel seasons 287, Museum 454-5 Adamkayalar 395 Afrodisias 307, 313-15, 409, 517 Great Theatre (Miletus) Adana 400-3, 401 314, 306 western 287-322, 227, 263 Aegean coast 221-86 288 Afyon 305-8 Anazarbus 404 Gymnasium of Vedius 226 accommodation 175, 221 Agora (İzmir) 201-2 Anemurium Ancient City Harbour Baths 227 food 175, 221 Alacahöyük 432 388-9, 397, 397 Harbour Street 227 highlights 176, 204-5, 222 Alexandria Troas 182 Angora wool 422 Hattuşa 428-31 history 223 Amisos Antik Kenti 504 Ani 14, 529, 543-6, 544, 15, Herakleia 254 north 175-220, 176 Ancient Patara 346-7 528-9 Hercules Gate 231 south 221-86, 222 Andriake 362 Ankara 411-22, 412, 415, Hierapolis 310-11, 310 travel seasons 175, 221 Anemurium Ancient City 419, 420
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-Azetouri-043
    MINISTRY OF CULTURE AND TOURISM OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN PROJECT No.2013-AZETOURI-043 “CITIES OF COMMON CULTURAL HERITAGE” SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH REPORT PROJECT MANAGER AYDIN ISMIYEV RESEARCHERS DR. FARIZ KHALILLI TARLAN GULIYEV 1 BAKU - 2014 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE “CITIES OF COMMON CULTURAL HERITAGE” PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. TURKEY 1.1. Van 1.2. Ahlat 1.3. Erzurum 1.4. Amasya 2. AZERBAIJAN 2.1. Ganja 2.2. Shamkir 2.3. Gabala 2.4. Shamakhi 2.5. Aghsu 3. KAZAKHSTAN 3.1. Esik 3.2. Tamgali 3.3. Taraz 3.4. Turkistan 3.5. Otrar 4. UZBEKISTAN 4.1. Samarkand 4.3. Shahrisabz 4.4. Termez 4.5. Bukhara 4.6. Khiva CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS ANNEX 1. Accomodation establishments ANNEX 2. Travel agencies ANNEX 3. Tour program 1 ANNEX 4. Tour program 2 ANNEX 5. Template Questionnaire ANNEX 6. Questionnaire results REFERENCES PHOTOS 2 INTRODUCTION Archaeological tourism is a new field within cultural tourism that has developed as a result of people’s interest in the past. Archaeological tourism consists of two main activities: visits to archaeological excavation sites and participation in the studies undertaken there. The target group of archaeological tourism includes intellectuals and various people having an interest in archaeology. Any politician, bank employee, doctor, artist or other professional or working person can now spend their vacation at the archaeological excavation site of which they’ve dreamed. The development of this tourism focus area presents a novel product to the tourism economy and increases innovation in archaeology. Three main paths must be followed in order to successfully offer an archaeological tourism product: research, conservation and promotion.
    [Show full text]