DOCSLIB.ORG

Office of State Archaeology (OSA) Standards and Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Office of State Archaeology (OSA) Standards and Guidelines NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR BACKGROUND RESEARCH, FIELD METHODOLOGIES, TECHNICAL REPORTS, AND CURATION -December 2017- About the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology The North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) was created by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1973 to coordinate and implement a statewide archaeological preservation program. Elements of this program include maintaining a statewide computer-based inventory of archaeological sites, enforcing the North Carolina Archaeological Resource Protection Act (G.S. 70 Article 2), and ensuring the proper treatment of human burials in cooperation with the individuals and organizations specified in the Unmarked Human Burial and Human Skeletal Remains Protection Act (G.S. 70 Article 3). An important aspect of North Carolina’s statewide archaeological preservation program is to implement the policies of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and later, North Carolina General Statute 121-12a. G.S. 121-12a provides for consideration of National Register properties in undertakings funded or licensed by the state. North Carolina Office of State Archaeology – Archaeological Investigation Standards and Guidelines (December 2017) Page ii Table of Contents PART 1. BACKGROUND RESEARCH .................................................................................. 1 I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 a. Qualifications ...................................................................................................................................... 1 b. Making an Appointment.................................................................................................................... 1 II. Accessing Records .......................................................................................................... 2 a. Maps ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 b. Site Forms ............................................................................................................................................ 2 c. Reports ................................................................................................................................................. 2 PART 2. TERRESTRIAL FIELD METHODOLOGY .......................................................... 3 I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 a. Definitions ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Defining an Archaeological Site .................................................................................................... 3 2. Site Occurrence Probability Categories ....................................................................................... 3 3. Area of Potential Effects ................................................................................................................ 4 4. Cemeteries and Grave Sites ........................................................................................................... 4 b. Qualifications and Permitting ........................................................................................................... 4 1. Principal Investigator Qualifications ............................................................................................ 4 2. Archaeological Investigations on State Lands ............................................................................ 4 c. Planning and Contingencies .............................................................................................................. 5 1. Background Research ..................................................................................................................... 5 2. Changes in Field Strategies/Methodologies ................................................................................ 5 3. Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains ................................................................................ 5 II. Forms of Investigation .................................................................................................... 5 a. Monitoring ........................................................................................................................................... 5 b. Reconnaissance Survey/Due Diligence .......................................................................................... 6 c. Phase I Identification Survey ............................................................................................................ 7 d. Phase II Evaluation/Testing ............................................................................................................. 7 e. Phase III Data Recovery/Mitigation or Treatment ....................................................................... 8 III. Field Methodologies ...................................................................................................... 8 a. Remote Sensing................................................................................................................................... 8 1. LiDAR and Multi-Spectral Imagery ............................................................................................. 9 2. On-Site Remote Sensing ................................................................................................................. 9 b. Pedestrian Reconnaissance ............................................................................................................. 10 c. Excavation ......................................................................................................................................... 10 1. Shovel Testing ............................................................................................................................... 10 2. Close-Interval Shovel Testing ..................................................................................................... 12 3. Soil Coring and Augering ............................................................................................................. 12 4. Test Unit Excavation .................................................................................................................... 12 North Carolina Office of State Archaeology – Archaeological Investigation Standards and Guidelines (December 2017) Page iii 5. Feature Excavation ....................................................................................................................... 13 d. Machine-Assisted Excavation ......................................................................................................... 14 1. Deep Testing .................................................................................................................................. 14 2. Mechanical Stripping .................................................................................................................... 14 e. Special Analyses .................................................................................................................................. 14 IV. Documentation ............................................................................................................ 14 a. Field Documentation ....................................................................................................................... 14 b. Recording a Site ................................................................................................................................ 15 c. Recording a Cemetery ...................................................................................................................... 15 d. GIS Mapping ..................................................................................................................................... 16 PART 3. TECHNICAL REPORTS ....................................................................................... 17 I. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 17 a. Submission of Reports ..................................................................................................................... 17 b. Site and Accession Numbers .......................................................................................................... 18 c. Site and Cemetery Forms ................................................................................................................ 18 d. Curation ............................................................................................................................................. 19 II. Monitoring Reports ....................................................................................................... 19 III. Reconnaissance Survey/Due Diligence Reports ......................................................... 20 IV. Phase I Identification Survey (Intensive Survey) Reports ............................................ 21 a. Management Summary .................................................................................................................... 21 b. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Waccamaw Subtype)
    NATURAL LAKE SHORELINE SWAMP (LAKE WACCAMAW SUBTYPE) Concept: Type covers tree-dominated vegetated wetland vegetation on the shores of medium to large permanent natural lakes. It extends inland to where the effect of lake hydrology on vegetation is replaced by the hydrology of the surrounding area, either upland or wetland. Subtype covers the unique calcareous example at Lake Waccamaw. The vegetation resembles that of the Cypress Subtype but has a distinctive and richer flora. Sites: Wetland zones along the shore of Lake Waccamaw, influenced by the calcareous waters, generally flooded much of the time by lake waters but exposed at low water levels. Soils: A specific soil series is not mapped, but soils are sand, presumably worked by wave action. Hydrology: Permanently to seasonally flooded. Water levels may vary over periods of a few years, in response to weather cycles. Vegetation: Open woodland of Taxodium ascendens. There are a few shrubs, including Alnus serrulata, Cephalanthus occidentalis, and Cyrilla racemiflora. The herb layer is patchy, with dense beds of graminoids, areas of sparse emergent or submersed plants, and a number of species that are visible only when water levels are low and the shoreline is exposed. The denser areas are dominated by Panicum hemitomon and Cladium mariscoides. Dominants in smaller patches include Eleocharis olivacea, Sclerolepis uniflora, and Centella erecta, and Boltonia asteroides and Ludwigia sphaerocarpa are abundant. A great diversity of other herbaceous species is present, including Andropogon
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2003 Online Supplement
    Electronic Archaeology News Volume 21 Number 3, Online Supplement Fall 2003 From the Editor: MVAC is excited to offer a new way for our members to receive current news about ongoing projects, new finds and upcoming events. We will continue to mail out a newsletter with announcements three times a year, and will provide more information in the online supplement. Please let me know what you think of this change and any suggestions you have for new MVAC at the University material to include. Members who would like a hard copy of the supplement of Wisconsin - La Crosse mailed to their homes can contact me at (608) 785-8454 or 1725 State Street [email protected]. Enjoy the newsletter! La Crosse, WI 54601 Jean Dowiasch, Editor www.uwlax.edu/mvac ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ State Highway 33 Projects Yields Upland Sites Vicki Twinde, Research Archaeologist In June of 2003, MVAC personnel conducted a MVAC has recommended more Phase I survey of approximately 7 miles of STH 33, archaeological work be done on from the intersection of County Highway F and STH these sites. Therefore, this fall, 33 at the top of Irish Hill to approximately 1/2 mile pending landowner permis- east of the town of St. Joseph. This is part of a sions, MVAC will undertake Wisconsin Department of Transportation project in additional archaeological work which approximately 21 miles of STH 33 will be re- on eight of these sites. done from CTH F all the way into the town of Cashton. The highway project will be completed in three different sections, as will the archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Field Collection of Archaeological Materials and Standard Operating Procedures for Curating Department of Defense Archaeological Collections
    Guidelines for the Field Collection of Archaeological Materials and Standard Operating Procedures for Curating Department of Defense Archaeological Collections Prepared for the Legacy Resource Management Program Office Legacy Project No. 98-1714 Mandatory Center of Expertise for the Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 1999 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Guidelines for the Field Collection of Archaeological Materials and Standard Operating Procedures for Curation Department of Defense Archaeological Collections 6. AUTHORS Suzanne Griset and Marc Kodack 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District 1222 Spruce Street (CEMVS-ED-Z) St. Louis, Missouri 63103-2833 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY Legacy Resource Management Program Office REPORT NUMBER Office of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental Security) Legacy Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing National Defense Authorization Act For
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 116–71] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2021 BUDGET REQUEST FOR NUCLEAR FORCES AND ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES HEARING HELD MARCH 3, 2020 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 41–409 WASHINGTON : 2021 SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES JIM COOPER, Tennessee, Chairman SUSAN A. DAVIS, California MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio RICK LARSEN, Washington JOE WILSON, South Carolina JOHN GARAMENDI, California ROB BISHOP, Utah JACKIE SPEIER, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SETH MOULTON, Massachusetts MO BROOKS, Alabama SALUD O. CARBAJAL, California BRADLEY BYRNE, Alabama RO KHANNA, California SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts LIZ CHENEY, Wyoming KENDRA S. HORN, Oklahoma, Vice Chair GRANT SCHNEIDER, Professional Staff Member SARAH MINEIRO, Professional Staff Member ZACH TAYLOR, Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S Page STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Cooper, Hon. Jim, a Representative from Tennessee, Chairman, Subcommit- tee on Strategic Forces ........................................................................................ 1 Turner, Hon. Michael R., a Representative from Ohio, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces ...................................................................... 1 WITNESSES Bawden, Allison B., Director, Natural Resources and
    [Show full text]
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592
    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare
    A Summary of the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina Submitted by Bryn H. Tracy North Carolina Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh, NC On behalf of the NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes November 01, 2014 Bigeye Jumprock, Scartomyzon (Moxostoma) ariommum, State Threatened Photograph by Noel Burkhead and Robert Jenkins, courtesy of the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries and the Southeastern Fishes Council (http://www.sefishescouncil.org/). Table of Contents Page Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes In North Carolina ........... 4 Summaries from the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina .......................................................................................................................... 12 Recent Activities of NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes .................................................. 13 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part I, Ohio Lamprey .............................................. 14 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part II, “Atlantic” Highfin Carpsucker ...................... 17 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part III, Tennessee Darter ...................................... 20 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part
    [Show full text]
  • K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts Tbrk1 Tbrk2 Tbrk3 Tbrk4
    K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 TBrk4 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 Rnd6 1 Chakraborty, Dipro 11 2299 5.5 21 24 43 20.5 W27 W12 W5 W32 W8 D3 State Champion, AZ Denker Representative 2 Yim, Tony Sung BASISS 8 2135 5 20.5 23.5 38.5 17.5 W24 W10 D3 D16 W11 W9 3 Aletheia-Zomlefer, Soren CHANPR 11 1961 5 20 23 35.5 18.5 W25 W26 D2 W40 W15 D1 4 Desmarais, Nicholas Eduard NOTRED 10 1917 5 18 20 33 18 W39 W23 W18 L15 W10 W8 5 Wong, Kinsleigh Phillip CFHS 10 1992 4.5 20 20 24.5 15 -X- W17 L1 W26 D7 W15 6 Todd, Bryce BASISC 10 1923 4.5 17 19 26.5 14.5 W38 D18 L9 W23 W21 W16 7 Chaliki, Kalyan DSMTHS 9 1726 4.5 17 18.5 26 15 W46 L16 W28 W22 D5 W17 8 Li, Bohan UHS 9 2048 4 22 25 29 18 W30 W11 W45 W9 L1 L4 9 Mittal, Rohan CFHS 9 1916 4 19.5 20.5 23 17 W47 W22 W6 L8 W20 L2 10 Pennock, Joshua CFHS 10 1682 4 19 22 24 14 W31 L2 W25 W21 L4 W29 11 Aradhyula, Sumhith CFHS 9 1631 4 18 20 22 14 W41 L8 W38 W13 L2 W19 12 Johnston, Nicolas Godfrey CFHS 9 1803 4 18 19.5 21 13 W43 L1 W29 L17 W24 W20 13 Martis, Tyler BRHS 12 1787 4 17 18 21 13 W42 L15 W24 L11 W18 W22 14 Plumb, Justin Rodney GCLACA 10 1700 4 16 17 20 13 W51 L32 W19 L20 W28 W27 15 Martinez, Isaac GLPREP 10 2159 3.5 21.5 24.5 27.5 16 W28 W13 D16 W4 L3 L5 16 Chen, Derek H CFHS 10 1965 3.5 21 23.5 26 15.5 W35 W7 D15 D2 D17 L6 17 Woodson, Tyler GILBHS 1640 3.5 19 19 17.5 14 W50 L5 W30 W12 D16 L7 18 Cancio, Aiya CFHS 9 1469 3.5 18.5 20 17.5 12.5 W36 D6 L4 W46 L13 W25 AZ Girls' Invitational Representative 19 Folden, Kurt CHANPR 10 1207 3 14 18 12 10 L32 W50 L14 W31 W23 L11 20 Thornton,
    [Show full text]
  • Research Design and Reports Bibliography & Glossary
    HANDOUT 1 — Research Design & Report Writing [11/2015] Suggested Reading & Glossary Anonymous 1992 Editorial Policy, Information for Authors, and Style Guide for American Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity. American Antiquity 57(4):749– 770. [on-line at http://www.saa.org/AbouttheSociety/Publications/ StyleGuide/tabid/984/Default.aspx] Bentley, R. Alexander, Herbert D. G. Maschner, and Christopher Chippindale 2008 Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland. Berger, Arthur Asa 2014 What Objects Mean: An Introduction to Material Culture. 2nd ed. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California. Binford, Lewis R. 2001a Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Ethnographic and Environmental Data Sets. University of California Press, Berkeley. 2001b Where Do Research Problems Come From? American Antiquity 66(4):669–678. 2009 Debating Archaeology. Updated ed. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California. Black, Stephen L., and Kevin Jolly 2003 Archaeology By Design. Archaeologist’s Toolkit Volume 1. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, California. Burke, Heather, Claire Smith, and Larry J. Zimmerman 2009 Getting Your Results Out There: Writing, Publication, and Interpretation. In: The Archaeologist’s Field Handbook: North American Edition, Chapter Ten. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland. 1 Chamberlin, Thomas C. 1890 The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses. Science (old series) 15:92– 96; reprinted 1965, Science 148:754–759. Clarke, David L. 1978 Analytical Archaeology. 2nd ed. Edited by Robert Chapman. Columbia University Press, New York. 1979 editor. Analytical Archaeologist: Collected Papers of David L. Clarke. Academic Press, New York. Cochrane, Ethan, and Andrew Gardner (editors) 2011 Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL FORESTS Forest Service Celebrates Weeks
    2011 Recreation Guide to the National Forests in North Carolina www.fs.usda.gov/nfsnc Forest Service celebrates Weeks Act PHOTO BY MARY NOEL From the Blue Ridge Parkway’s Green Knob Overlook, drivers can view the Burke-McDowell Tract, the first land purchased for eastern national for- ests through the 1911 Weeks Act. Known as the Curtis Creek tract, the land is part of the Grandfather Ranger District of Pisgah National Forest. which solidified ownership with one A century of entity and allowed the government to buy the land without a cloud on conservation: the title. Over the last 100 years, North 1911-2011 Carolina has become home to the by Mary Noel Nantahala, Pisgah, Uwharrie and magine if no national forests Croatan national forests, which existed in North Carolina. encompass more than 1.2 million This was reality in the early acres — about 4 percent of North 20th century. Early national Carolina’s land. forests in the West were These North Carolina national Iestablished from public lands by forest lands now include: 1909. However, the U.S. government l 11 congressionally designated needed to purchase land from wilderness areas. private landowners if national forests PHOTO COURTESY OF FOREST SERVICE l Three research experimental were to exist in the East. THE LANDS NOBODY WANTED: Most lands acquired in the early 1900’s were stripped of trees and excessively eroded from farming. forests (Bent Creek, Coweeta and With strong public support, the Blue Valley) Weeks Act became law on March 1, a price of just over $7 per acre. Later often had only a general idea of l Three National Wild and Scenic 1911, under the leadership of Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan
    SOUTHERN BLUE RIDGE ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN Summary and Implementation Document March 2000 THE NATURE CONSERVANCY and the SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN FOREST COALITION Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan Summary and Implementation Document Citation: The Nature Conservancy and Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition. 2000. Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan: Summary and Implementation Document. The Nature Conservancy: Durham, North Carolina. This document was produced in partnership by the following three conservation organizations: The Nature Conservancy is a nonprofit conservation organization with the mission to preserve plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. The Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition is a nonprofit organization that works to preserve, protect, and pass on the irreplaceable heritage of the region’s National Forests and mountain landscapes. The Association for Biodiversity Information is an organization dedicated to providing information for protecting the diversity of life on Earth. ABI is an independent nonprofit organization created in collaboration with the Network of Natural Heritage Programs and Conservation Data Centers and The Nature Conservancy, and is a leading source of reliable information on species and ecosystems for use in conservation and land use planning. Photocredits: Robert D. Sutter, The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This first iteration of an ecoregional plan for the Southern Blue Ridge is a compendium of hypotheses on how to conserve species nearest extinction, rare and common natural communities and the rich and diverse biodiversity in the ecoregion. The plan identifies a portfolio of sites that is a vision for conservation action, enabling practitioners to set priorities among sites and develop site-specific and multi-site conservation strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Wake Forest Magazine Offers a 70 Class Notes Series of Milestones Along with the Millstones in the Story of Women at the University
    CAMPUS DURING COVID-19 | WFU WOMEN: A HISTORY OF THEIR OWN | KAREN BAYNES-DUNNING (’89): UNDAUNTED SPRING 2021 R E A D I N G t h e R I V E R THE MAGAZINE OF WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY FEATURES 38 COPING IN THE PANDEMIC Photography by Ken Bennett Wake Forest’s director of photography captured the first month of the fall semester, when campus community members embraced “Show Humanitate.” 2 52 READING THE RIVER LESSONS FROM A TIME OF By Carol L. Hanner UPHEAVAL Yadkin Riverkeeper Brian Fannon (’89) By Kerry M. King (’85) combines biology, history and a love of water Six alumni reflect on student life in the for his exceptional life in the flow. 1960s and early ’70s and how 2020 echoes those times. 18 88 UNDAUNTED CONSTANT & TRUE By Maria Henson (’82) By Sophie Hollis (’19) Karen Baynes-Dunning (’89) infuses arduous A young grad learns about isolation and work for social justice and children’s progress reaching out in a pandemic. with lessons from wondrous family lore. 34 DEPARTMENTS A HISTORY OF THEIR OWN 66 Around the Quad Illustration by Lisa Perrin As women move into their second century of 69 Philanthropy voting rights, Wake Forest Magazine offers a 70 Class Notes series of milestones along with the millstones in the story of women at the University. WAKEFOREST FROM theh PRESIDENT MAGAZINE 2019 ROBERT SIBLEY this issue of wake forest magazine is the first of 2021, a year MAGAZINE OF THE YEAR that will mark the University’s continuing challenges with the COVID-19 pandemic and an upcoming personal milestone for me and my wife, Julie.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Management
    1 CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA: GUIDELINES FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS July 1991 (Reprinted January 2001) Bureau for Historic Preservation Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Commonwealth Keystone Building, 2nd Floor 400 North Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120-0093 (717) 783-8947 2 "This publication has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicap in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240." 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: PHILOSOPHY AND PURPOSE 4 The Review Process 5 Recommended Action 7 Phase I 7 Phase II 8 Phase III 9 CHAPTER II GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES 11 Phase I Guidelines 12 Site Visit 12 Prehistoric Contexts 12 Historic Contexts 12 Urban Contexts 13 Submerged Contexts 13 Background Research 13 Prehistoric Contexts 13 Historic 15 Urban 16 Submerged 17 Field Testing 18 Prehistoric 19 Historic 21 Urban 21 Submerged 22 Analysis 23 Phase II Guidelines 23 Background Research 23 Prehistoric 23
    [Show full text]