DOCSLIB.ORG

Wou Women's Basketball

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wou Women's Basketball WOU WOMEN’S BASKETBALL - YEAR-BY-YEAR RESULTS 1976-77 (10-10) L62-67 Oregon H L47-67 Portland State A W62-41 Southern Oregon H L54-69 Washington H W68-65 Alaska Fairbanks H W59-52 Eastern Washington A W72-54 Central Washington A W65-59 Oregon State H L58-69 Seattle Pacific H L64-81 Washington A L46-78 Oregon A L45-53 Portland State H W61-45 Oregon State A W61-52 Southern Oregon A L61-66 Alaska Anchorage H L55-64 Alaska Anchorage N W77-59 Alaska Fairbanks N W58-55 Alaska Anchorage N W61-60 Oregon N1 L60-69 Washington N H 3-5; A 4-3; N 3-2 1977-78 (7-11) L45-79 Washington A L54-64 Western Washington A W63-46 Linfield H L51-74 Washington State H L52-66 Boise State H L58-73 Oregon H L57-62ot Oregon State A W77-53 Southern Oregon H W77-53 Portland State H L56-72 Alaska Anchorage H W46-42 Washington H L55-75 Western Washington H W79-48 Southern Oregon A W83-65 Lewis & Clark H L57-68 Portland State H L40-90 Oregon A L61-64 Montana State H W58-49 Montana H H 6-7; A 1-4; N 0-0 1978-79 (19-7) L75-76 Oregon State H W75-48 Eastern Oregon H W76-61 Alaska Anchorage H W68-39 Gonzaga (Wash.) A W62-53 Pacific Lutheran (Wash.) A L66-68 Alaska Fairbanks H L38-62 Alaska Fairbanks H W68-54 Seattle Pacific H W62-48 Lewis & Clark A W80-41 Linfield H W89-20 Oregon Tech H W77-65 Southern Oregon H L52-63 Portland State A L63-64 Southern Oregon N W72-32 George Fox N W72-30 Oregon Tech A W68-62 Southern Oregon A W77-52 Linfield A L74-75 Portland State H W78-68 Alaska Anchorage H H 7-4; A 6-1; N 1-1 1979-80 (25-4) AIAW Region 9 Champion W75-37 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H W72-63 Linfield H L64-69 Alaska Anchorage H W65-55 Alaska Anchorage H W64-53 Alaska Fairbanks H L52-60 Alaska Fairbanks H W71-58 Southern Oregon N W57-34 Lewis & Clark A W89-53 Puget Sound (Wash.) A W81-38 Seattle Pacific A W63-49 Willamette A W96-60 Eastern Oregon H W58-55 Southern Oregon H W79-44 Lewis & Clark H L58-65 Southern Oregon A W76-56 Willamette H W73-60 Linfield A W61-50 Montana H H 9-2; A 5-1; N 1-0 1980-81 (22-3) Cascade Conference Champion AIAW Region 9 Champions L49-67 Portland State A W66-50 Pacific H W81-54 Lewis & Clark H W85-52 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H W69-32 Oregon Tech H W75-69 Linfield H W67-54 Eastern Oregon A W71-40 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A W46-45 Southern Oregon A W57-38 Oregon Tech A W74-51 Portland H W54-38 Southern Oregon H W71-43 Lewis & Clark A W66-36 Alaska Fairbanks H W63-58 Linfield A W90-66 Eastern Oregon H W71-55 Pacific A W64-60 Portland A W88-61 George Fox H L49-66 Idaho H W Whitworth H W74-55 Puget Sound (Wash.) H AIAW REGION 9 PLAYOFFS W67-65 Eastern Oregon N L52-56 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A W60-48 Whitworth (Wash.) N H 12-1; A 8-2; N 2-0 1981-82 (24-6) Cascade Conference Champion AIAW Region 9 Champion W71-41 Seattle Pacific A L63-66 Puget Sound (Wash.) A L59-72 Portland State A W72-46 Pacific A W60-53 Western Washington H L58-60 Linfield-OT A W67-58 Pacific Christian H W39-37 Pacific Lutheran (Wash.) H W80-57 Portland H W71-52 Oregon Tech H W77-40 Linfield H W63-58 Concordia H W63-45 Puget Sound (Wash.) H W73-40 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A W64-58 Eastern Oregon A W70-36 Southern Oregon H W99-34 Pacific H W84-64 Portland State H W55-46 Oregon Tech A W61-40 Southern Oregon A W92-45 Eastern Oregon H L45-50 Concordia A W64-61 Portland N W94-49 Seattle Pacific H W58-42 Whitworth (Wash.) A L67-72 Eastern Washington A AIAW REGION 9 PLAYOFFS W82-45 George Fox N W68-58 Puget Sound (Wash.) N W66-49 Concordia A L56-64 Malone (Ohio) N H 13-0; A 8-4; N 3-1 1982-83 (25-6) Cascade Conference Champion W82-56 Willamette H W74-72 Portland State H W74-57 Linfield H L58-83 Portland A W86-57 Warner Pacific A W86-79 Western Washington H W77-61 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H L71-74 Colorado State N L67-72 Portland State N W61-50 Alaska Fairbanks N W86-59 Eastern Oregon H W91-63 George Fox H W86-41 Southern Oregon H W76-57 Oregon Tech H W68-54 Concordia H W84-50 Pacific H W104-51 Linfield A W83-50 George Fox A W95-39 Warner Pacific H L45-81 Portland H W67-34 Willamette A W83-61 Judson Baptist H L53-55 Concordia A W76-58 Alaska Fairbanks H W63-51 Oregon Tech A W84-60 Southern Oregon A W99-75 Pacific A W74-54 Western Washington A W62-59 Pacific Lutheran (Wash.) A DISTRICT 2 PLAYOFFS L49-54 Concordia H W59-56 Oregon Tech H H 16-2; A 9-2; N 1-2 1983-84 (25-4) Cascade Conference Champion W91-53 Pacific H W83-47 George Fox A W75-64 Saint Martin’s (Wash.) H W63-55 Central Washington H W64-59 Central Washington H W82-44 Linfield A L67-91 Portland A W80-77 Southern Oregon A W59-48 Oregon Tech A W73-37 Judson Baptist H W72-49 Judson Baptist A W65-55 Willamette A W78-68 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H W65-57 Eastern Oregon H W64-61 Concordia A W63-56 Saint Martin’s (Wash.) A W64-56 Biola (Calif.) H L62-64 Portland H W74-42 Oregon Tech H W86-45 Southern Oregon H W70-42 Pacific A W73-46 Concordia H L61-67 Eastern Oregon A W76-63 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A W82-56 George Fox H W73-53 Willamette H DISTRICT 2 PLAYOFFS W90-80 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) N W74-72 Eastern Oregon-OT N L57-71 Portland N H 13-1; A 10-2; N 2-1 1984-85 (24-5) Cascade Conference Champion W69-63 Calgary N L50-94 Eastern Washington A W67-59 Pacific A W58-48 Willamette H W75-57 George Fox A L36-60 Portland A W66-44 Saint Martin’s (Wash.) A W47-44 Puget Sound (Wash.) A W68-53 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A W66-61 Eastern Oregon A W76-52 Hawaii Pacific H W66-38 Oregon Tech H W75-35 Southern Oregon H W75-57 Concordia H W61-50 Willamette A L59-74 Portland H W69-51 Pacific H W79-45 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H L49-52 Eastern Oregon H W75-59 Concordia A W80-56 Linfield A W69-41 George Fox H W56-53 Oregon Tech A W75-44 Southern Oregon A W79-52 Saint Martin’s (Wash.) H W69-45 Linfield H DISTRICT 2 PLAYOFFS W58-44 Pacific N W70-59 Eastern Oregon N L42-65 Portland N H 10-2; A 11-2; N 3-1 1985-86 (21-10) Cascade Conference Champion W80-67 Linfield H W98-47 Saint Martin’s (Wash.) H L48-72 Portland State A W55-46 Willamette A L45-69 Cal Poly Pomona H W67-49 Humboldt State (Calif.) H L50-54 Azusa Pacific (Calif.) H L54-75 Western Washington H L40-69 Saint Mary’s (Calif.) N W58-54 Simon Fraser (B.C., Canada) N L55-57 Pomona-Pitzer (Calif.) H W71-57 Oregon Tech A W66-47 Southern Oregon A W91-47 Concordia H L64-68 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A W52-42 Eastern Oregon A W66-59 Lewis & Clark A W75-63 George Fox H L49-60 Portland H W74-57 George Fox A W74-62 Linfield A W58-48 Willamette H W80-71 Concordia A W65-62 Eastern Oregon H W66-53 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H L62-63 Portland A W69-54 Oregon Tech H W66-46 Southern Oregon H DISTRICT 2 PLAYOFFS W73-57 Linfield H W66-39 Eastern Oregon H L46-54 Portland H H 12-6; A 8-3; N 1-1 1986-87 (26-6) Cascade Conference Champion District 2 Champion W73-66 Warner Pacific A W80-51 Willamette A W73-63 Linfield A W84-59 George Fox H W86-57 Azusa Pacific (Calif.) H L61-75 Western Washington A W62-61 Puget Sound (Wash.) A W93-75 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A W99-84 Eastern Oregon A L49-74 Portland State A W70-61 Southern Oregon H W74-59 Oregon Tech H W65-55 Linfield H L62-67 Concordia A W95-39 Pacific H W77-62 Warner Pacific H L46-60 Portland A W90-68 Pacific A W84-64 Eastern Oregon H W72-48 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H L73-78 Portland H W74-59 Southern Oregon A W64-62 Oregon Tech A W76-51 George Fox A W93-81 Lewis & Clark H W76-66 Willamette H W77-75 Concordia H DISTRICT 2 PLAYOFFS W105-64 George Fox H W74-67 Warner Pacific H W76-57 Concordia H REGION I CHAMPIONSHIP W82-62 Seattle H NAIA I NATIONAL CHAMPI0NSHIP L80-90 St. Ambrose (Iowa) N H 16-1; A 10-4; N 0-1 1987-88 (14-13) W75-70 Linfield H W57-49 Willamette H L36-67 Puget Sound (Wash.) A L49-79 Western Washington A L54-76 Portland A W72-62 Puget Sound (Wash.) H L81-95 Eastern Oregon A L82-98 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A L77-89 Concordia A W80-78 Warner Pacific H W57-51 Lewis & Clark A W83-75 Southern Oregon H W61-58 Oregon Tech H L55-59 George Fox A W81-68 Pacific A W76-69 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H W93-89 Eastern Oregon H L50-53 Willamette A W56-77 Warner Pacific A L67-85 Concordia H L60-79 Portland State A W79-55 Oregon Tech A L49-56 Southern Oregon A W57-56 Pacific H L68-53 Linfield A L83-85 George Fox-2OT H DISTRICT 2 PLAYOFFS L59-69 George Fox H H 10-4; A 4-9; N 0-0 1988-89 (14-14) W77-46 Willamette A L56-68 Pacific H L59-66 Linfield H L50-67 Portland A W58-57 Seattle H L64-77 Western Washington H L55-70 Seattle A W75-73 Puget Sound (Wash.) A L55-71 Warner Pacific H W66-64 Concordia H W67-63 Southern Oregon H W84-63 Oregon Tech H L58-70 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A L79-87 Eastern Oregon A W78-65 George Fox H L58-89 Portland State A W89-45 Western Baptist H L59-71 Concordia A L62-78 Warner Pacific A W81-61 Willamette H W63-43 Southern Oregon A L49-52 Oregon Tech A W92-89 Eastern Oregon-OT H W75-46 Western Baptist A W69-63 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H W85-64 Lewis & Clark H L64-71 George Fox A DISTRICT 2 PLAYOFFS L76-94 Eastern Oregon A H 10-4; A 4-10; N 0-0 1989-90 (21-12) Cascade Conference Champion L74-90 Willamette A L63-84 Western Washington H L70-76 Pacific H W60-46 Linfield H L72-80 Portland A L58-71 Seattle A L44-80 Western Washington A W87-73 Concordia (Texas) N L63-65 Concordia A W66-56 Eastern Oregon A L58-67 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) A W79-35 Western Baptist H W86-45 Oregon Tech H W71-60 Southern Oregon H W70-56 Linfield A W109-47 Columbia Christian H W80-52 Concordia A W66-62 Willamette H L62-70 Lewis & Clark A W59-54 George Fox H W71-61 Warner Pacific H W82-66 Northwest Nazarene (Idaho) H W76-73 Eastern Oregon H W89-56 Western Baptist A L55-62 Southern Oregon A W77-59 Oregon Tech A L50-91 Portland State A W79-43 Concordia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hearing National Defense Authorization Act For
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 116–71] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2021 BUDGET REQUEST FOR NUCLEAR FORCES AND ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES HEARING HELD MARCH 3, 2020 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 41–409 WASHINGTON : 2021 SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES JIM COOPER, Tennessee, Chairman SUSAN A. DAVIS, California MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio RICK LARSEN, Washington JOE WILSON, South Carolina JOHN GARAMENDI, California ROB BISHOP, Utah JACKIE SPEIER, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SETH MOULTON, Massachusetts MO BROOKS, Alabama SALUD O. CARBAJAL, California BRADLEY BYRNE, Alabama RO KHANNA, California SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts LIZ CHENEY, Wyoming KENDRA S. HORN, Oklahoma, Vice Chair GRANT SCHNEIDER, Professional Staff Member SARAH MINEIRO, Professional Staff Member ZACH TAYLOR, Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S Page STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Cooper, Hon. Jim, a Representative from Tennessee, Chairman, Subcommit- tee on Strategic Forces ........................................................................................ 1 Turner, Hon. Michael R., a Representative from Ohio, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces ...................................................................... 1 WITNESSES Bawden, Allison B., Director, Natural Resources and
    [Show full text]
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592
    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts Tbrk1 Tbrk2 Tbrk3 Tbrk4
    K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 TBrk4 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 Rnd6 1 Chakraborty, Dipro 11 2299 5.5 21 24 43 20.5 W27 W12 W5 W32 W8 D3 State Champion, AZ Denker Representative 2 Yim, Tony Sung BASISS 8 2135 5 20.5 23.5 38.5 17.5 W24 W10 D3 D16 W11 W9 3 Aletheia-Zomlefer, Soren CHANPR 11 1961 5 20 23 35.5 18.5 W25 W26 D2 W40 W15 D1 4 Desmarais, Nicholas Eduard NOTRED 10 1917 5 18 20 33 18 W39 W23 W18 L15 W10 W8 5 Wong, Kinsleigh Phillip CFHS 10 1992 4.5 20 20 24.5 15 -X- W17 L1 W26 D7 W15 6 Todd, Bryce BASISC 10 1923 4.5 17 19 26.5 14.5 W38 D18 L9 W23 W21 W16 7 Chaliki, Kalyan DSMTHS 9 1726 4.5 17 18.5 26 15 W46 L16 W28 W22 D5 W17 8 Li, Bohan UHS 9 2048 4 22 25 29 18 W30 W11 W45 W9 L1 L4 9 Mittal, Rohan CFHS 9 1916 4 19.5 20.5 23 17 W47 W22 W6 L8 W20 L2 10 Pennock, Joshua CFHS 10 1682 4 19 22 24 14 W31 L2 W25 W21 L4 W29 11 Aradhyula, Sumhith CFHS 9 1631 4 18 20 22 14 W41 L8 W38 W13 L2 W19 12 Johnston, Nicolas Godfrey CFHS 9 1803 4 18 19.5 21 13 W43 L1 W29 L17 W24 W20 13 Martis, Tyler BRHS 12 1787 4 17 18 21 13 W42 L15 W24 L11 W18 W22 14 Plumb, Justin Rodney GCLACA 10 1700 4 16 17 20 13 W51 L32 W19 L20 W28 W27 15 Martinez, Isaac GLPREP 10 2159 3.5 21.5 24.5 27.5 16 W28 W13 D16 W4 L3 L5 16 Chen, Derek H CFHS 10 1965 3.5 21 23.5 26 15.5 W35 W7 D15 D2 D17 L6 17 Woodson, Tyler GILBHS 1640 3.5 19 19 17.5 14 W50 L5 W30 W12 D16 L7 18 Cancio, Aiya CFHS 9 1469 3.5 18.5 20 17.5 12.5 W36 D6 L4 W46 L13 W25 AZ Girls' Invitational Representative 19 Folden, Kurt CHANPR 10 1207 3 14 18 12 10 L32 W50 L14 W31 W23 L11 20 Thornton,
    [Show full text]
  • The Maintenance of a Capable, Credible
    he maintenance of a capable, size of the deployed strategic arsenal B61 nuclear gravity bomb, carried by credible nuclear deterrent shrinks and the US reviews its nuclear the B-52 and B-2 bomber fleets. seems to have consensus gov- requirements. In the near future, officials want to Ternmental support. Defense and Energy Department lead- consolidate the number of warheads to Despite heavy investment in the nu- ers want to streamline and standardize the curb costs and accommodate an evolving clear mission over the last few years, Air maintenance of the nation’s warheads—a concept of nuclear deterrence, which Force and senior defense officials say process that has long been unpredictable may be far different from the policies much work lies ahead for the nation’s and irregular, according to a senior USAF and assumptions that dominated the Cold stockpile of nuclear warheads. official working in the Air Staff’s nuclear War. The task is to bring the nuclear Not long ago, ambitious plans were deterrence shop. weapons complex—the nation’s nuclear on the books for a new nuclear earth- warheads and the laboratories and facili- penetrating weapon and the first new- Consolidation ties charged with their care, testing, and build warhead since the Cold War. Then, “We are in a period of transition,” said maintenance—into the 21st century. Administrations changed and the budget Billy W. Mullins, the associate assistant As a result, over the coming decade- crunch hit. chief of staff for strategic deterrence plus, the National Nuclear Security In the aftermath of the New START and nuclear integration on the Air Staff.
    [Show full text]
  • NUCLEAR WEAPONS Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program’S Schedule Constraints
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees July 2020 NUCLEAR WEAPONS Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program's Schedule Constraints GAO-20-409 July 2020 NUCLEAR WEAPONS Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program’s Schedule Constraints Highlights of GAO-20-409, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found To maintain and modernize the U.S. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a separately organized nuclear arsenal, NNSA and DOD agency within the Department of Energy (DOE), has identified a range of risks conduct LEPs. In 2014, they began facing the W80-4 nuclear warhead life extension program (LEP)—including risks an LEP to produce a warhead, the related to developing new technologies and manufacturing processes as well as W80-4, to be carried on the LRSO reestablishing dormant production capabilities. NNSA is managing these risks missile. In February 2019, NNSA using a variety of processes and tools, such as a classified risk database. adopted an FPU delivery date of However, NNSA has introduced potential risk to the program by adopting a date fiscal year 2025 for the W80-4 LEP, (September 2025) for the delivery of the program’s first production unit (FPU) at an estimated cost of about $11.2 that is more than 1 year earlier than the date projected by the program’s own billion over the life of the program. schedule risk analysis process (see figure). NNSA and Department of Defense The explanatory statement (DOD) officials said that they adopted the September 2025 date partly because accompanying the 2018 appropriation the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2015 specifies that NNSA included a provision for GAO to must deliver the first warhead unit by the end of fiscal year 2025, as well as to review the W80-4 LEP.
    [Show full text]
  • NEMA Motor Control
    Bulletin Eutectic Alloy Overload Relays Heater Elements Selection For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Heater Element Selection Type J — CLASS 10 Table of Contents 0 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Overload Relay Type WL — CLASS 30 Class Designation...... this page Heater Element Selection ....................... this page 1 Type W Heater Elements Ambient Temperature Correction..................... this page Time — Current Characteristics............ 1-169 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables ............................. 1-170 3 Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application 4 overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F). When the temperature difference is greater, see percent of its current rating. below. A Class 10 overload relay will trip in 10 seconds or less at a current 1. The Same Temperature at the Controller and the Motor — equal to 600 percent of its rating. Select the “Heater Type Number” with the listed “Full Load 5 Amperes” nearest the full load value shown on the motor A Class 20 overload relay will trip in 20 seconds or less at a current nameplate.
    [Show full text]
  • US Nuclear Deterrence Policy and Japan's Nuclear Policy
    www.fas.org US Nuclear Deterrence Policy and Japan’s Nuclear Policy Hans M. Kristensen Director, Nuclear Informaon Project Federaon of American Sciensts [email protected] | 202-454-4695 Briefing to GENSUIKIN Tokyo March 6, 2015 www.fas.org History and Status More than 125,000 warheads produced since 1945 Peak of 64,500 stockpiled warheads in 1986 (70,300 if including rered warheads) • US stockpile peaked early (1967) • Russian stockpile peaked late (1986) Enormous reducons since 1986 peak: • ~54,000 warhead stockpile reducon • ~47,000+ warheads dismantled ~10,000 warheads in stockpiles (~16,000 if counng rered warheads awaing dismantlement) US and Russia possess 90% of global inventory (94% if counng rered warheads); each has more than 4 mes more warheads than rest of world combined; 15 mes more than third-largest stockpile (France) Decreasing: US, Russia, Britain, France Increasing: China, Pakistan, India Israel relavely steady; North Korea trying Hans M. Kristensen, Federation of American Scientists, 2015 | Slide 2 www.fas.org With more than 90% of world inventory, US and Russia have US-Russian Arsenals special responsibility to reduce Reducon of deployed strategic warheads from some 23,000 in 1989 to 3,500 in 2014 (New START counts 3,285) Readiness level of remaining strategic forces is high: about 1,800 warheads on prompt alert No official de-alerng, but significant reducon of overall alert numbers: heavy bombers de-alerted, US ICBMs and SLBMs downloaded, non-strategic forces de-alerted Trend: pace of reduc3on is slowing Note: rered, but sll intact, warheads awaing dismantlement are not shown US cut only 309 warheads in 2009-2013, compared with 3,287 warheads cut in 2004-2008 Russia cut an esmated 1,000 warheads in 2009-2013, compared with 2,500 in 2004-2008 Instead of connuing pace or increasing reducons, US and Russian stockpiles appear to be leveling out for the long haul; new emphasis on modernizaon New iniaves needed to prevent stalling of arms control Hans M.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Databook, Volume I 3 Stockpile
    3 Stockpile Chapter Three USNuclear Stockpile This section describes the 24 types of warheads cur- enriched uranium (oralloy) as its nuclear fissile material rently in the U.S. nuclear stockpile. As of 1983, the total and is considered volatile and unsafe. As a result, its number of warheads was an estimated 26,000. They are nuclear materials and fuzes are kept separately from the made in a wide variety of configurations with over 50 artillery projectile. The W33 can be used in two differ- different modifications and yields. The smallest war- ent yield configurations and requires the assembly and head is the man-portable nuclear land mine, known as insertion of distinct "pits" (nuclear materials cores) with the "Special Atomic Demolition Munition" (SADM). the amount of materials determining a "low" or '4high'' The SADM weighs only 58.5 pounds and has an explo- yield. sive yield (W54) equivalent to as little as 10 tons of TNT, In contrast, the newest of the nuclear warheads is the The largest yield is found in the 165 ton TITAN I1 mis- W80,5 a thermonuclear warhead built for the long-range sile, which carries a four ton nuclear warhead (W53) Air-Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) and first deployed equal in explosive capability to 9 million tons of TNT, in late 1981. The W80 warhead has a yield equivalent to The nuclear weapons stockpile officially includes 200 kilotons of TNT (more than 20 times greater than the only those nuclear missile reentry vehicles, bombs, artil- W33), weighs about the same as the W33, utilizes the lery projectiles, and atomic demolition munitions that same material (oralloy), and, through improvements in are in "active service."l Active service means those electronics such as fuzing and miniaturization, repre- which are in the custody of the Department of Defense sents close to the limits of technology in building a high and considered "war reserve weapons." Excluded are yield, safe, small warhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Corso Sectional Series
    Corso Sectional Series DESIGN YOUR OWN SERIES Contemporary style with modular flexibility, this Corso sectional provides both extreme comfort and the opportunity to change your configuration on demand. Shown in the 42-inch depth but add further dimension with the optional 38-inch opportunity. SHOWN: (5) U2A1-SBC Corso Armless Chairs (1) U2E1-SBC Cosro Sectional Chair Seat height: 16 Finish: Modern Elm BUILD YOUR CORSO SECTIONAL IN 6 EASY STEPS STEP 1: Select your Upholstery STEP 4: Select your Seat Style STEP 2: Select your Depth S - Single Bench Cushion U2 Depth: 42" M - Multi, Three Seat Cushion U8 Depth: 38" STEP 5: Select your Back Style STEP 3: Select your Frame B - Box (loose) O1 - Ottoman K - Knife (loose) SL - Left Arm Sofa W=93" STEP 6: Select your Base Style SR - Right Arm Sofa W=93 W - Wood Foot DL - Left Arm Davenport Corner Sofa W=107" C - Concealed foot DR - Right Arm Davenport Corner Sofa W=107" LL - Left Arm Loveseat W=65" LR - Right Arm Loveseat W=65" NOTE: Additional 13" x 23" Kidney Pillows are E1 - Sectional Chair W=42" eliminated on the #U8 (38" depth) frame styles. A1 - Armless Chair W=28" SHOWN: U8SL-MBW Corso Left Arm Sofa U801-SXW Corso Ottoman U8SR-MBW Corso Right Arm Sofa Arm height: 25 / Seat height: 16 Finish: Modern Elm Corso Sectional Elements 1/4" = 1' Scale U2 U8 Depth Depth = 42" = 38 " U2A1 Corso Armless Chair U2E1 Corso Corner U2SL Corso Left Arm Sofa Overall: W28 D42 H35 Inside: W28 D24 H21 Overall: W42 D42 H35 W93 D42 H35 Inside: W24 D24 H21 Inside: W84 D24 H21 U8A1 Corso Armless Chair Overall: W28
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Project List 2017-04-24
    Transportation System Development Charge (TSDC) Project List Total Non- Growth City SDC Eligible Project # Project Name Project Location Estimated Growth Cost Responsibility Cost Cost Cost Share Share Driving Solutions (Intersections, Extensions & Expansions) Molalla Avenue from Washington Street to Molalla Avenue/ Beavercreek Road Adaptive D1 Gaffney Lane; Beavercreek Road from Molalla $1,565,000 75% 25% 100% $391,250 Signal Timing Avenue to Maple Lane Road D2 Beavercreek Road Traffic Surveillance Molalla Avenue to Maple Lane Road $605,000 75% 25% 100% $151,250 D3 Washington Street Traffic Surveillance 7th Street to OR 213 $480,000 75% 25% 100% $120,000 D4 7th Street/Molalla Avenue Traffic Surveillance Washington Street to OR 213 $800,000 75% 25% 100% $200,000 OR 213/ 7th Street-Molalla Avenue/ D5 Washington Street Integrated Corridor I-205 to Henrici Road $1,760,000 75% 25% 30% $132,000 Management D6 OR 99E Integrated Corridor Management OR 224 (in Milwaukie) to 10th Street $720,000 75% 25% 30% $54,000 D7 14th Street Restriping OR 99E to John Adams Street $845,000 74% 26% 100% $216,536 D8 15th Street Restriping OR 99E to John Adams Street $960,000 80% 20% 100% $192,000 OR 213/Beavercreek Road Weather D9 OR 213/Beavercreek Road $120,000 100% 0% 30% $0 Information Station Warner Milne Road/Linn Avenue Road Weather D10 Warner Milne Road/Linn Avenue $120,000 100% 0% 100% $0 Information Station D11 Optimize existing traffic signals Citywide $50,000 75% 25% 100% $12,500 D12 Protected/permitted signal phasing Citywide $65,000 75% 25% 100%
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Be Funded Transportation System
    Table 2: Likely to be Funded Transportation System Project # Project Description Project Extent Project Elements Priority Further Study Identify and evaluate circulation options to reduce motor OR 213/Beavercreek Road Refinement OR 213 from Redland Road to Molalla D0 vehicle congestion along the corridor. Explore alternative Short-term Plan Avenue mobility targets. Identify and evaluate circulation options to reduce motor I-205 at the OR 99E and OR 213 Ramp vehicle congestion at the interchanges. Explore alternative D00 I-205 Refinement Plan Short-term Terminals mobility targets, and consider impacts related to a potential MMA Designation for the Oregon City Regional Center. Driving Solutions (Intersection and Street Management- see Figure 16) Molalla Avenue from Washington Street to Molalla Avenue/ Beavercreek Road Deploy adaptive signal timing that adjusts signal timings to D1 Gaffney Lane; Beavercreek Road from Molalla Short-term Adaptive Signal Timing match real-time traffic conditions. Avenue to Maple Lane Road Option 1: Convert 14th Street to one-way eastbound between McLoughlin Boulevard and John Adams Street: • Convert the Main Street/14th Street intersection to all-way stop control (per project D13). • From McLoughlin Boulevard to Main Street, 14th Street would be restriped to include two 12-foot eastbound travel lanes, a six-foot eastbound bike lane, a six-foot westbound contra-flow bike lane, and an eight-foot landscaping buffer on the north side • From Main Street to Washington Street, 14th Street would be restriped to include
    [Show full text]
  • 119 $159 $99 $99 $129
    You’ve Captured W45 My Heart. in Silver $129 Valentine’s Day February 14th Each piece is engraved, “You’ve Captured W83 My Heart.” LOVEI YOU W46 Diamond Dancers W6 V81 I U In 14K Gold V18 18K Rose Gold Diamonds that Dance Over Silver More to the Beat of Her Heart. W8 $99 More $159 W8 1/4 ctw $799 Reg. $1200 V18 14K $399 Reg. $600 V81 .15 ctw $699 Reg. $1050 W6 14K $599 Reg. $900 18K Yellow Gold Over Silver Silver & 18K Rose Gold Overlay V71 W28 $119 W27 W63 Bridal Sets V70 W29 W27 1 Carat tw $3,299 Reg. $4950 Silver & 18K W28 .55 ctw $1,999 Reg. $3000 $99 Rose Gold Overlay $99 W29 .60 ctw $2,399 Reg. $3600 K44 & K45 V100 K44 & K45 Diamond 1/2 ctw $1,599 V100 1/3 ctw $899 1 ctw $3,199 V101 .20 ctw $699 Celebration Rings V33 1/2 ctw $1,399 in 14K V33 V101 www.dickinsonjewelers.com Diamond Dancers Silver & Diamonds $99 Reg. $150 W61 Cross & in Silver Infinite W54 R98 W62 W51 V106 Love W60 Infinity Necklace W55 W60 $69 Reg. $105 W86 Your Choice $129 Reg. $195 18K Rose Gold My Angel Diamonds that Silver & CZ Over Silver W86 $69 Reg. $105 is With Me Dance to the Beat of her Heart. W61 $99 Reg. $150 W62 Silver & Diamonds $149 Reg. $225 NEW! Swarovski Crystal T83 W51 $199 Reg. $300 in Sterling Silver V64 W52 W52 $199 Reg. $300 Gold & T83 $99 Reg. $150 Faith V106 $159 Reg. $240 Diamonds R60 Pendant in Sterling Silver W89 R60 $149 Reg.
    [Show full text]