“Montgomery's Corner” and “30 Mile Post”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Montgomery's Corner” and “30 Mile Post” Surveyors on a What surveyor is not fascinated with quad maps? How about a 2000’ offset in a state boundary? Add some neat labels like “Montgomery’s Corner” and “30 Mile Post”, a few good friends, a love of the mountains, and a plan is born. Looking north at Hightower Bald and its neighbors on the drive to Blue Ridge Gap. Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • Vol. 8 No. 6 • Copyright 2011 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com Busman’s Holiday on a his “offset” is on the north slope of North Georgia’s Hightower Bald, some 4,000 feet in elevation. Its tale is a continuation of the story of the Camak Stone, described by Bart Crattie in the Nov/Dec 2009 Georgia Land Surveyor. In 1818, mathematician James Camak, surveyor Hugh Montgomery, and others headed east from the incorrectly positioned Camak Stone. Though intending to follow the 35th parallel to the corner of Tennessee on the northern boundary of Georgia, their entire line is south of that parallel. They also continued well past the Georgia/Tennessee boundary to set a mark that became known as “Montgomery’s Corner”. In 1819, Camak and a different group headed west from Ellicott’s Rock, which had been accurately set in 1811 at the NE corner of Georgia. They veered south of the 35th parallel but still found themselves nearly a half mile north of Montgomery’s Corner. Rather than correct the error, they merely marked a north/ south line connecting the new “30 Mile Post” and the previous year’s Montgomery’s Corner. This caused the entire northern boundary of Georgia to be south of where it was intended. >> Paul Hoinowski Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • Vol. 8 No. 6 • Copyright 2011 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com Inspired by recent visits to Ellicott’s Rock and Ellicott’s Mound, a spot on the map, and the recent publication The Story of Georgia’s Boundaries by Dr. William Morton, surveyor Max Davis proposed a trip to visit this offset. On April 1, 2011, surveyors Max, Phillip Brown, and myself, along with GIS Professional Brian Lackey and Max’s brother Bill converged from several directions on Blue Ridge Gap. One came straight from a mine survey inside a north Georgia mountain, and several came from middle Georgia by an unintentionally convoluted route through the Athens area. It would seem two surveyors in a pickup could follow road signs while chatting about old cars and former coworkers. Not so. The intention was to follow the Appalachian Trail (AT) north from Blue Ridge Gap for several miles, then spend the night in Hightower Gap after a short Map annotated by the author. Map off-trail walk. With high winds and drop- Traditional paper quad maps have so much to tell us. ping temperatures, the flat campsite with flowing spring along the AT at Bly Gap just inside North Carolina was too inviting. Hightower Gap would wait until morning. This was the perfect date to watch a surprising number of AT “Through Hikers”, a week into their walk to Maine, pass by. A considerable subculture has formed around this spring event, with as many personality quirks among the hikers as you’ll find in the field crew room of a survey company during the height of a building boom. It was great fun to watch, and difficult not to envy them a bit. After a brief but unexpected late night snow flurry, morning came. We headed for the offset. The GA/NC sign on the AT seemed noticeably north of the state line on the quad map. At the first off-trail gap the surveyors in the group were attracted to a bright yellow sign on a knoll. The uphill walk, in the wrong direction, came to a wilderness area sign. Don’t wave brightly colored signs or flagging unless you want to lure surveyors. The simplest route was over the top of Rich Knob. Several in the group were hatching a scheme to visit all of Georgia’s peaks over 4000 feet. This would be the first on their list. The walk down to Hightower Gap revealed one flat spot about twice the area of a hood of a Chevy Suburban. High winds funneled over it. Yesterday’s choice to From Blue Ridge Gap north, all of the walk was in both the Chattahoochee National stay in Bly Gap now seemed very smart. Forest and the Southern Nantahala Wilderness. The state line is the Wilderness The walk continued west along a slender boundary in this area. ridge, past occasional early spring flow- Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • Vol. 8 No. 6 • Copyright 2011 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com ers and views through the leafless trees to both north and south. After ascending part way up Hightower Bald to the estimated elevation of Montgomery’s Corner, we turned northwest and out of the wind. A wildlife trail led under low-hanging rhododendrons and onto Sharptop Ridge. Again, there was a wil- derness area sign. Standing on a natural rock outcrop, it was clear we were near Montgomery’s Corner. Both paper quad map contours and Smartphone GPS agreed. While wandering about hoping to find a monument, mark, or something to indicate the corner, we found our- selves on top of Hightower Bald. 4000’+ Peak Number Two. Back at the rock outcrop, options were discussed. We were near the point but had no official coordinates. A photo of a geocacher claiming to be at Montgomery’s Corner showed this same rock. Coordinates from geocachers and the quad map both pointed here. Could they be off like the GA/NC sign and the wilderness signs suggest? No mark of any type was visible. What next? The way north toward the 30 Most of the group at the top of Rich Knob, about to turn towards Hightower Gap. Mile Post looked real steep, nearly as (l-r Brian Lackey, Max Davis, Paul Hoinowski, Bill Davis) steep a downhill slope as our surveyor friend, Jim Preston, predicated. (He had chosen not to come.) The contour map showed it getting even steeper near the 30 Mile Post. We would have to come back up this slope! The day was late with one of us facing an early morning flight. With a bit of relief not to be walk- ing down that hill, the group retraced its route back to the trucks. As we finished a good meal in town, Preston called to hear about our results. We had three answers: First: He was right. It was steep, really steep! Second: If this was a paying job, it would be a spectacular failure. We simply did not recover the points. More research is required. Third: If the goal was fun with friends in the mountains, it was a complete and wonderful success. Either next month or next year, we will be back. With renewed energy, a better description of the points and, hopefully, with State Plane coordinates. Except where noted all of the photos are by Phillip Brown. Paul Hoinowski has worked for several surveying firms in central Georgia. He is currently pleased to be surveying for the Bibb County Engineering Department. Quad maps may have a lot to say, but they won’t always tell you where you are. Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • Vol. 8 No. 6 • Copyright 2011 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to the Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan
    SOUTHERN BLUE RIDGE ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN Summary and Implementation Document March 2000 THE NATURE CONSERVANCY and the SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN FOREST COALITION Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan Summary and Implementation Document Citation: The Nature Conservancy and Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition. 2000. Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan: Summary and Implementation Document. The Nature Conservancy: Durham, North Carolina. This document was produced in partnership by the following three conservation organizations: The Nature Conservancy is a nonprofit conservation organization with the mission to preserve plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. The Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition is a nonprofit organization that works to preserve, protect, and pass on the irreplaceable heritage of the region’s National Forests and mountain landscapes. The Association for Biodiversity Information is an organization dedicated to providing information for protecting the diversity of life on Earth. ABI is an independent nonprofit organization created in collaboration with the Network of Natural Heritage Programs and Conservation Data Centers and The Nature Conservancy, and is a leading source of reliable information on species and ecosystems for use in conservation and land use planning. Photocredits: Robert D. Sutter, The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This first iteration of an ecoregional plan for the Southern Blue Ridge is a compendium of hypotheses on how to conserve species nearest extinction, rare and common natural communities and the rich and diverse biodiversity in the ecoregion. The plan identifies a portfolio of sites that is a vision for conservation action, enabling practitioners to set priorities among sites and develop site-specific and multi-site conservation strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning
    Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning July 20, 2010 Prepared by the Northwest Georgia Regional Commission with funding from The Georgia Department of Community Affairs 10072010.124 CEDS PLANS Acknowledgements: Portions of this document derive from the Inventory and Assessment for the 2004 Coosa-North Georgia Joint Regional Comprehensive Plan, prepared by the Coosa Valley Regional Development Center and the North Georgia Regional Development Center. The descriptions and maps of the Environmental Corridors are based on the Georgia Department of Natural Resources’ 1976 “Environmental Corridor Study.” 10072010.124 CEDS PLANS Northwest Georgia Greenspace Conservation and Greenway Planning Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Description of Region III. Why Conserve? IV. Threats V. Visions and Goals VI. Measures in Place VII. Conservation Tools VIII. Funding Sources IX. Potential Partners X. Incentives XI. Existing Public Resources XII. Planning and Implementation Strategies XIII. Greenways Concept Map XIV. Model for Greenspace Development Guidelines XV. Map Appendix 10072010.124 CEDS PLANS Introduction The dispersal of population into once remote and rural areas has caused land consumption to soar. According to the U.S. Bureau of Census Data on Urbanized Areas, from 1970 to 1990, Atlanta experienced a 161.3% growth in total land area, while Chattanooga showed an expansion of 120.1%. These two metro areas are linked by Interstate 75, and as they grow together, they will consume much unprotected land in the fifteen-county region. While population growth is a factor in land consumption, development patterns are as important. From 1970 to 1990, the population of Detroit decreased by 7%, while sprawl increased by 28%.
    [Show full text]
  • 27 CFR Ch. I (4–1–20 Edition) § 9.161
    Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury Pt. 9 or the quantity in which to purchase 9.34 Finger Lakes. them for sale to consumers. 9.35 Edna Valley. (b) The industry member obligates 9.36 McDowell Valley. the retailer to participate in the pro- 9.37 California Shenandoah Valley. 9.38 Cienega Valley. motion to obtain the industry mem- 9.39 Paicines. ber’s product. 9.40 Leelanau Peninsula. (c) The retailer has a continuing obli- 9.41 Lancaster Valley. gation to purchase or otherwise pro- 9.42 Cole Ranch. mote the industry member’s product. 9.43 Rocky Knob. (d) The retailer has a commitment 9.44 Solano County Green Valley. not to terminate its relationship with 9.45 Suisun Valley. 9.46 Livermore Valley. the industry member with respect to 9.47 Hudson River Region. purchase of the industry member’s 9.48 Monticello. products. 9.49 Central Delaware Valley. (e) The practice involves the industry 9.50 Temecula Valley. member in the day-to-day operations of 9.51 Isle St. George. the retailer. For example, the industry 9.52 Chalk Hill. member controls the retailer’s deci- 9.53 Alexander Valley. 9.54 Santa Ynez Valley. sions on which brand of products to 9.55 Bell Mountain. purchase, the pricing of products, or 9.56 San Lucas. the manner in which the products will 9.57 Green Valley of Russian River Valley. be displayed on the retailer’s premises. 9.58 Carmel Valley. (f) The practice is discriminatory in 9.59 Arroyo Seco. that it is not offered to all retailers in 9.60 Shenandoah Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 635 R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHEE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Previous publication.................................................. 5 Personnel............................................................. 5 Classification.......................................................... 5 Bench marks......................................................... 6 Datum............................................................... 6 Topographic maps.................................................... 7 Precise leveling............................................................ 7 Atlanta, Baxley, Brunswick, Cochran, Dalton, Eastman, Everett, For- syth, Gresston, Jackson, Jesup, Lumber City, McDonough, McRae, Macon, Marietta, Ringgold, Rome, Scotland, Surrency, and Tobesofkee quadrangles (Appling, Bibb, Butts, Clayton, Cobb, Coffee, Dodge, Floyd, Fulton, Glynn, Gordon, Henry, Monroe, Pauldiug, Polk, Pulaski, Telfair, Twiggs, Wayne, and Whitfield counties)...................... 7 Ringgold quadrangle (Dade County)................................... 14 Macon and Meriwether quadrangles (Baldwin, Bibb, and Jones counties) . 15 Primary leveling........................................................... 16 Dahlonega, Dalton, and Ellijay quadrangles (Fannin, Gilmer, Habersham, Lumpkin, Murray, Rabun, Towns, Union, White, and
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Wild and Scenic Rivers
    CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS APPENDIX D WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS The Wild and Scenic Rivers (WSR) Act of 1968 established the National WSR System. The Rivers analyzed in this Appendix are being assessed, through the Forest planning process, as being suitable for designation as part of the National WSR System. The rivers were identified by nomination by the public, by aquatic professionals, and by the Forest’s Ranger Districts. Eighty-eight streams were suggested in the beginning. (See FSH 1909.12 – Land and Resource Management Planning Handbook, Chapter 8 – Wild and Scenic River Evaluation.) FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT D-1 APPENDIX D CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS Table D- 1. Rivers Suggested for WSR Evaluation District ID River Quads Armuchee 5/8/96 1100 Armuchee Creek (East) Sugar Valley, Subligna 1200 Johns Creek Sugar Valley 1300 Swamp Creek Villanow 1400 Stover Creek Villanow Brasstown 4100 Cooper Creek Mulky Gap, Coosa Bald, Gap 4110 Sea Creek Mulky Gap 4200 Dicks Creek/Blood Mountain Creek Neels Gap 4210 Mulky Creek (Toccoa) Mulky Gap 4300 Nottely River Most on Private Land 4310 West Wolf Creek Coosa Bald 4320 Wolf Creek Coosa Bald 4400 Hiwassee River Most on Private Land 4411 Swallow Creek (Hiwassee) Macedonia 4411a Dismal Creek (Hiwassee) Macedonia 4420 Cynth Creek (Hiwassee) Macedonia 4431 Silas Branch (Hiwassee) Tray Mountain 4440 Corbin Creek (Hiwassee) Tray Mountain 4441 Brier Creek (Hiwassee) Tray Mountain 4450 High Shoals Creek (Hiwassee) Tray Mountain Chattooga. 4/18/96 6100 Chattahoochee River Jacks
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Selected Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks of Georgia: a Review
    GEOLOGY OF SELECTED MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC ROCKS OF GEORGIA: A REVIEW Compiled by Harold R. Vincent Keith I. McConnell Philip C. Perley DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DMSION INFORMATION CIRCULAR 82 GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY Cover photo: Typical outcrop of metagabbroic rocks of the Brasstown complex, exposed along the shore of Lake Chatuge, near the old Lower Bell Creek corundum mine, approximately 1-3/4 miles north of Hiawassee, Towns County, Georgia. GEOLOGY OF SELECTED MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC ROCKS OF GEORGIA: A REVIEW Compiled by Harold R. Vincent Keith I. McConnell Philip C. Perley Georgia Department of Natural Resources J. Leonard Ledbetter, Commissioner Environmental Protection Division Harold F. Reheis, Assistant Director Georgia Geologic Survey William H. McLemore, State Geologist Atlanta 1990 INFORMATION CIRCULAR 82 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Methods of Investigation ............................................................................................. _, ....... 1 An Overview of Previous Investigations .................................................................................... .1 Blue Ridge ................................................................................................................ 1 Northern Piedmont/Blue Ridge? .......................................................................................... .3 Southern Piedmont ... : . ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME RC 004 140 Schretter, Howard A. the Georgia
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 037 264 RC 004 140 AUTHOR Schretter, Howard A. TITLE The Georgia Mountains: A View of its Resources, Problems and Potentials. INSTITUTION Georgia Univi., Athens. Inst. of Community and Area Development. PUB DATE 64 NOTE 93p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.50 HC-$4.75 DESCRIPTORS Adult Education, Area Studies, Community Planning, Community Resources, *Economic Opportunities, *Educational Needs, Employment Problems, Planning Commissions, *Population Trends, Regional Planning, *Rural Areas, Social Opportunities, Tourism, *Urban Areas, Vocational Education IDENTIFIERS *Georgia ABSTRACT In this 1964 report, it is noted that some towns and counties in the rural and urban areas of Georgia have been beset with problems associated with population growth and economic expansion, while others have been faced with combating trends of population loss and economic decline. In a unique approach to effective planning and development activities, practically all of Georgia's local governments pooled financial and technical resources to examine the region closely in terms of significant conditions, trends of the time, and outstanding problems and potentials. It was found , for example, that the most far-reaching population trend in the mountains area was its continuing loss of young people, who tended to leave home in search of better economic and social opportunities. Problems also existed in upgrading educational levels for future generations, and emphasis was placed on providing adult education and technical vocational training. The document is appended with tables of data which comprise the base of the study. (AN) U.S. DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH. EDUCATION A WELFARE OFFICE Of EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS KEN IMPIODUCED EXAM AS RECEIVED MN THE PERSON 01 016AINIATION 0116111A1ING IT.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Appalachian Trail Club
    GEORGIA APPALACHIAN TRAIL CLUB PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT OF THE APPALACHIAN TRAIL IN GEORGIA DECEMBER 2006 1 Table Of Contents PART I. - Introduction A. Purpose B. Background PART II. - THE COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/PARTNERS A. The Georgia Appalachian Trail Club B. The Appalachian Trail Conservancy C. The National Park Service D. The U.S.D.A. Forest Service E. The State of Georgia F. Other AT Maintaining Clubs G. Environmental Groups H. Landowners PART III. - The PHYSICAL TRAIL A. Trail Standards B Trail Design/Location/Relocation C. Trail Construction and Maintenance D. Trail Shelters and Campsites E. Signs and Trail Markings F. Bridges and Stream Crossings G. Trail Heads and Parking H. Tools I. Water Sources J. Trail Monitoring Techniques K. Side Trails L. Safety M. Sanitation N. Memorials/Monuments PART IV. - PUBLIC USE, PUBLIC INFORMATION, AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE A. Emergency Planning and Coordination B. Special Events and Large Group Use C. Public Information and Education Programs D. Caretaker and Ridgerunner Programss E. Accessibility 2 PART V. - CONFLICTING USES AND COMPETING USES A. Vehicular Traffic B. Abandoned Personal Property C. Hunting D. Horses and Pack Animals E. Roads F. Special Uses G. Utilities and Communications Facilities H. Oil, Gas and Mineral Exploitation I. Military Operations J. Corridor Monitoring PART VI.- RESOURCE MANAGEMENT A. Open Areas and Vistas B. Timber Management C. Pest Management D. Threatened and Endangered Species E. Wildlife F. Vegetation Management and Reclamation G. Historical/Cultural/Natural Resources PART VII. - WILDERNESS A. Motorized Equipment B. Treadway Improvement C. Trail Standards D. Shelters E. Scenic Vistas F. Signs and Trail Markings G.
    [Show full text]
  • Towns County Community Calendar
    Page 4A THETHE TOWNS TOWNS COUNTYCOUNTY HERALDHERALD AugustAugust 22,22, 20182018 Long Overdue Fall Gardening Unsung Once again as a mem- The Do you usually have a fall Greetings good people. It ber of our American Legion Veterans’ garden? If not then now is the takes more than soil, seed, and Dishin’ Post #23 under the auspices of time to start thinking about one. spade to create and maintain Corner Watching Dirt VFW Post 7807 here in Towns There are some benefits to hav- and Working what is becoming the dynam- Scott County, I received another ing a fall garden that we will get Jacob ic Hamilton Gardens at Lake Dale blessing. We were notified by Drummond in to. Let’s talk about what veg- Chatuge.The toil in the soil by Harmon our commanders of the home- USCG Veteran etable crops and cover crops are Williams the super-human Hammies has coming for the remains of Cor- an option for a fall garden and been extolled en masse and in- poral Terrell J. Fuller for his memorial and funeral service to how the Extension office can educate you to keep your garden dividually but the Ham Backbone has been kept a secret. Well, be held on Saturday, August 11, 2018 which would have been green year round, unless it’s buried in snow! gird your loins. I have no idea what that means but have always his 88th birthday. Brings tears of mixed emotions just to try Cover crops are planted in the fall and grow throughout wanted to use that phrase.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Inventoried Roadless Evaluations
    CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS APPENDIX C INVENTORIED ROADLESS EVALUATIONS This appendix contains evaluations on the Chattahoochee Natonal Forest's 23 roadless areas. The inventoried roadless areas total approximately 65,000 acres (Table C- 1). These are the areas under study that could be recommended to Congress for study and possible designation as wilderness, allocated for remote backcountry experiences that retain roadless characteristics, or allocated for needed wildlife habitat and forest ecosystem restorations that retain roadless characteristics. Table C- 1. Inventoried Roadless Acres Inventoried Roadless Area Acres Ben Gap 1,294 Big Mountain 2,923 Boggs Creek 2,075 Cedar Mountain 1,140 Duck Branch 190 Lance Creek 9,064 Ellicott Rock Addition 704 Foster Branch 165 Helton Creek 2,451 Indian Grave Gap 1,024 Joe Gap 5,383 Kelly Ridge 8,396 Ken Mountain 527 Miller Creek 714 Patterson Gap 1,209 Pink Knob 12,174 Rocky Mountain 4,306 Sarah's Creek 6,922 Shoal Branch 412 Tate Branch 1,085 Tripp Branch 638 Turner Creek 1,515 Wilson Cove 563 TOTAL 64,874 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT C-1 APPENDIX C CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS Figure C - 1 Cohutta RD Roadless Areas MCCAYSVILLE ! Ken Mountain Foster Branch BLUE RIDGE ! Pink Knob CHATSWORTH ! Cohutta Ranger District ELLIJAY Roadless Areas ! Roadless Areas 0510 Miles Forest Service Ownership Figure C - 2. Toccoa RD Roadless Areas !MCCAYSVILLE YOUNG HARRIS ! MORGANTON BLAIRSVILLE BLUE RIDGE! ! Pink Knob ! Rocky Mountain Indian Grave Gap ELLIJAY SUCHES ! ! Lance Creek Toccoa Ranger District Roadless Areas Roadless Areas 0714 ForeDAHst SLOeNrvicEGAe Ownership Miles ! C-2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHATTAHOOCHEE-OCONEE NATIONAL FORESTS APPENDIX C Ben Gap YOUNG HARRIS ! ! HIAWASSEE Shoal Branch Wilson Cove Kelly Ridge MORGANTON BLAIRSVILLE ! ! Tripp Branch Duck Branch Helton Creek Cedar Mountain HELEN SUCHES ! ! Brasstown Ranger District Miller Creek Roadless Areas Roadless Areas 0612 CLEVELAND ! Miles ! Forest Service Ownership Figure C - 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tallulah River Near Clayton, Georgia (Station 02178400)
    Hydrologic Benchmark Network Stations in the Eastern U.S. 1963-95 (USGS Circular 1173-A) Abstract and Map List of all HBN Introduction to Analytical Index Stations Circular Methods Tallulah River near Clayton, Georgia (Station 02178400) This report details one of the approximately 50 stations in the Hydrologic Benchmark Network (HBN) described in the four-volume U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1173. The suggested citation for the information on this page is: Mast, M.A., and Turk, J.T., 1999, Environmental characteristics and water quality of Hydrologic Benchmark Network stations in the Eastern United States, 1963–95: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1173– A, 158 p. All of the tables and figures are numbered as they appear in each circular. Use the navigation bar above to view the abstract, introduction and methods for the entire circular, as well as a map and list of all of the HBN sites. Use the table of contents below to view the information on this particular station. Table of Contents 1. Site Characteristics and Land Use 2. Historical Water Quality Data and Time-Series Trends 3. Synoptic Water Quality Data 4. References and Appendices Site Characteristics and Land Use The Tallulah River HBN Basin is in the Blue Ridge physiographic province in the northeast corner of Georgia (Figure 10. Map of the study area in the Tallulah River Basin and photograph of the basin landscape near Tate City, Georgia). The basin drains 146 km2 of steep, mountainous terrain that ranges in elevation from 573 m at the gage to 1 Figure 10. Map of the study area in the Tallulah River Basin and photograph of the basin landscape near Tate City, Georgia 2 1,676 m at the summit of Standing Indian Mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Establishment of the Upper Hiwassee Highlands Viticultural Area
    Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Proposed Rules 41891 rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February extending upward from 700 feet or more NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; or 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant above the surface of the earth. • Hand Delivery/Courier In Lieu of preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation * * * * * Mail: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and as the anticipated impact is so minimal. AGL ND E5 Mandan, ND [Amended] Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite Since this is a routine matter that will 200–E, Washington, DC 20005. Mandan Municipal Airport, ND only affect air traffic procedures and air ° ′ ″ ° ′ ″ See the Public Participation section of (Lat. 46 46 05 N., long. 100 53 40 W.) this notice for specific instructions and navigation, it is certified that this rule, That airspace extending upward from 700 when promulgated, will not have a feet above the surface within a 9.6-mile requirements for submitting comments, significant economic impact on a radius of Mandan Municipal Airport, and and for information on how to request substantial number of small entities that airspace extending upward from 1,200 a public hearing. under the criteria of the Regulatory feet above the surface within a 30-mile radius You may view copies of this notice, Flexibility Act. of lat. 46°35′58″ N., long. 100°43′26″ W. selected supporting materials, and any The FAA’s authority to issue rules Issued in Fort Worth, TX on July 8, 2013.
    [Show full text]