DOCSLIB.ORG

Rfe/Rl Inc. Analyses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RFE/RL INC. DAIL, 3ROADCAST 1(2; BROADCAST ARCHIVE ANALYSES Rgc-R RADIO LIBERTY DAILY.BROADCAST ANALYSIS NO. 234 (A summary of the news coverage by the Russian- language programming appears at the end of the DBA.) Russian Daily Broadcast Analysis No. 234 for Saturday and Sunday, 1 and 2 October 1977 M. Gelischanow A. SOVIET TOPICS - POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND CULTURAL: 1. French Prime Minister Barre's Visit to the Soviet Union was the subject of WORLD THIS WEEK No. 371 (Salkazanova, P 6) of October 1. Both sides have stressed that they are aiming for a deepening of Soviet -French collaboration in industry and trade. The major problem in trade relations is that up to now a balance of payments has never been reached between France and the Soviet Union and the latter's debts are constantly growing. Another major topic of discussion was France's desire to have Air France's new airliner "air bus" fly Paris-Moscow, on which the Soviet Union has:' placed a series of conditions. In the political sphere the problems of detente and disarmament were discussed butthe situation in Africa a subject they both disagree on, was ignored. 2. Soviet-Chinese Relations. WORLD THIS WEEK No. 371 (Bykovsky, NY 4) of October 1 referred to the addresses of ,Foreign Ministers Andrei Gromyko and Huang Hua at the plenary meeting of the 32nd session of the UNGA. It was noted that Gromyko's speech was de- voted largely to detente and contained very little polemical material on China, while Huang Hua once again denounced the Soviet Union's imperialistic schemes in Africa, the Indian Ocean, and Europe. 3. Dissidents and Human Rights. SAMIZDAT REVIEW No. 295 (Fedoseyeva, M 29:30) of October I read the text of a document by lawyer Sofiya Kallistratova entitled "Some Remarks on the Occasion of the USSR Draft Constitution." SAMIZDAT REVIEW No. 296 (Fedoseyeva, M 27) of October 2 featured Larisa Bogaraz' and Anatoly Marchenko's "Letter to the Newspaper" and a humorous sketch by Pinkhas Podrabinek "On the Eve to Belgrade, on the Threshhold of.a Better Constitution in the World." These documents!were included in the appeal signed by 12 Soviet citizens and sent to the CPSU CC Politburo in connection with the nationwide discus'sion of the new Soviet draft constitution. Podrabinek's Punitive Medicine continued to be read in DOCUMENTS OF OUR TIME No. 135 (Burshtein, M 27) of October 1. Venedikt Yerofeyev's Moscow-Petushki continued to be read in UNPUBLISHED WORKS OF SOVIET AUTHORS No. 755 (Kunta, M 20:30) of October 1. 'Bulat Okudzhava's twa'songsThreei-Loves And The Song About the Moscow Subway were sung in Polish by Bogdan Lazuka and Woiciech Mlynarski in THEY SING No. 567 -(Mitina, M. 4:30) of October 1. 4. Soviet -American Relations wwere the subject of WORLD THIS WEEK No. 371 (Savemark, W 3) of October l'Which noted Gromyko's and President Carter's meeting in Washington and the apparent progress that has been made in the discussions on arms limitations, and excerpted parts of their announcements to the press. PANORAMA (Davydov, NY. 5) Ofbetqber 2 gave the substance of an article by Herbert Mayer in The New Leader .examining the Course. of US -Soviet relations, The author concluded that for the first time in past years the-Kremliis in need of the White House more than the White HOuse:pee4sthe,-KreMlin 5. SALT Negotiations.'. 'SIGNAL No. 113.11.(Predtechevsky, M 12) of October 2 discussed the possibilities of the.qualitativeasPects of the limitation of Soyiet-and.AmexiCan strategic weapons. -It was noted that the qualitative limitations were the Main elements of the plan -proposed by-Tresident:_Carter,for-it has become obvious with the years that the armsrade:hasbecome transformed from the sphere of the: quantitative:O.-the qualitative. The, program referred to the fact that both sides possess advantages in those fields in which thelOIAVe-COricentrated.their efforts, and if the eXisting.armS.stockSwere to be frozen, neither side would possess preemptive first -strike capability. 6. The Absurdity of Soviet Jubilee Celebrations was featured in - RADIO JOURNAL: THE. SOVIET UNION NO:.186:(Bplotserkovsky, M.6:30) of. October 1. As an example-cf Soviet', fetishism the case of 'Semen Tsvigun, first deputy .to the chairman of, 'the KGB who 'was awarded Hero of Socialist Labor in Connection with his. 60th birth- day,' was given. According to Soviet handbooks published before 1974, Tsvigun is actually 61, but as a gift 'to him (to be honored with the same age as the .0ctober.Revolutionsvig,un was rejuvenated by one year, The. program- noted 'that during the past 15 years . the' jubilee mania has readied ridiculous proportions and .analyzed the main reason for this. phenomenpn:diting:Floris Shragin.and Valentin Turchin's_Inertia,pf Fear,- These celebrations are designed to serve the purpose of detraCting.:attention from the everyday humdrum of life and filling peoples consciousness so that no.rooM:remains thbught’s.!’ .It is not by chance that the jubilee mania Coincicle'a with the anniversary of the dis- sident movement, 'the agricUlturaiarisis and 'a' slower pace of .economic growth:. -3- 7. Agriculture. RADIO. 'JOURNAL: THE SOVIET UNION No. .186 (Belotserkovsky and Kroncher, M 7) of .October 1 discussed the rather unexpected line taken .by the Soviet authorities increasing the recognition that the private sector plays. an important role in Soviet agriculture. Up tO .now the Soviet leaders have attempted to conceal the true economic importance of the private sector; namely, that the productiOnOfa fourth of. all agricultural gross output comes from private farms. KOmabmolskaya Praxda and Izvestiya stated that s.a. phrase noting.the.necessity of developing the support of private farms should be included in the.constitution'as a testimony to the long-range significance accorded to these farms. _This.newattitude means that the. Soviet regime has admitted that.the:governMent section by itself is. not capable of supplying the demands of its citizens, and noted that praOtice sometimes causes a.retreat from dogmatic theory, that in this case may become a:serious liability, -but that the . attitude May again changa.underrthe influence of party dogmatism. 8. The Launching of the Soviet Space Station Salyut -6, most. .probably a.saluta to the 20th anniversary. of the space era and- the 60th anniversary of the. October revolution, was reported on WORLD .THIS WEEK No. 371 '(Muaiin;..MY:4) Of October 1. 9. CPSU-East German CP Relations was the topic of PROBLEMS OF INTERNATIONALISM No. 24 (Silnitsky, NY 9) 'Of October 2. The program recalled the history of the, East German CP, noting the purges and the process of "bolshevization" in the party. Melvin Krone, who analyzed the results of socialist construction in East Germany, 'published in Communist States in Disorder, was cited. 10 A Review of the .New Edition of BorisScUvarine's Book "Stalin" .which appeared in Le Monde Diplothatique was featured in PANORAMA (Mirsky, P 5) of October 2. 'Boris Souvarine was one of the founders and later secretary, of the Third International from which he.was later excluded; li. History.. FIFTY YEARS AGO .THIS WEEK No. 157 (Gendler, NY 13:30) of October 2' examined and compared' the enormous changes in the connotation of.historial events, people and .terms in the Bolshaya Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya of 1927 to the same topics listed in the subsequent twO editions. of this encyclopedia. .The ..prOgram noted that at first glance the latest. edition Of the Bolshaya Sovetskaya EntsiklopediYa seems to show the greatest reserve and deliberation in the wording, but upon closer inspection the careful planning is seen to' be of the kind that denies the readers the so-called objective truth. THE STATE OF SOCIETY IN .TOTALITARIAN COUNTRIES No. 62 (Agursky, Isr 6:30) of October -1 presented an interpretation of Soviet history .which analyzes. it as a continuous network of conspiracies, parti- cularly flourishing during the Stalinist period of Soviet history and culminating in the trials of the 19.30s.. The program was based .on Robert Tucker's book Sviet Political Thought.. Tucker. analyzed Stalin's tendency to imagine himself surrounded by spies and enemies as a paranoia that Sawany.opposition to or criticism of him as evidence:.of.deepseated,treachery:.: 'RETURNING TO :HISTORYNa. 13 Menkina, M. 29) of October 1. recalled the events in Russia during the thitd week of September sixty years ago focusing on the_lagt days.of.the.Democratic Conference in Petrograd. The Democratic COhference formed the Russian Democratic Council apre-parliament,to which the Provisional. Government had to reply government staff. From Finland Lenin insisted that the Bolsheviks boycott the pre- parliament and propagated the immediate seizure of PoWer. The program excerpted from ConteMporaivnewspapers and passages from books concerning that period 12. :The Emigre Press REVIEW OF THE RUSSIAN -LANGUAGE FOREIGN PRESS No. 57 :(SchajoVici,::M 13). of'DCtober'l presented the con- siderably abridged text ofGyuzel Amalrik's reminiscences of her meeting in a prison. camp in. the-areafof Magadan with her husband Andrei. Amalrik in the winter,of.1.971.;'.published in Kontinent Nr. 11140 B. CROSS -REPORTING: AND. OTHER TOPICS OF COMMUNIST AFFAIRS: 1. Eurocommunism was featutedon:ROUND-TABLE TALK. No. 317 (Matusevich,:A..Vardy, Raht; and:Bensi, M 20) of October 1 which discussed the following asPects.of'EuraCommUnisM: the forthcoming trip of Spanish CPSecretary,.Santiagb,Cartillo to Moscow, the crisis of the left coalition in France, and the rejection of the "Marxist-Leninist" dogma by, one 'of the leaders of the PCI. 2. The. CPR. .-PEKING AND; ITS 'POLICY No. 438 .(Shilaeff, of October .2 examined the revised charter 'adopted at the Eleventh Party Congress and ComPared'some points of this charter to the one of 1969.
Recommended publications
  • Full Case Study

    Full Case Study

    National Park Service National Park Service U. S. Department of the Interior Civic Engagement www.nps.gov/civic/ Civic Engagement and the Gulag Museum at Perm-36, Russia Through communication with former prisoners and guards and an international dialogue with other "sites of conscience," The Gulag Museum at Perm-36, Russia, is building all its programs on a foundation of civic engagement. In December 1999, National Park Service (NPS) Northeast Regional Director Marie Rust became a founding member of the International Coalition of Historic Site Museums of Conscience. At the Coalition’s first formal meeting, Ms. Rust met Dr. Victor Shmyrov, Director of the Gulag Museum at Perm-36 in Russia, another founding institution of the Coalition. Dr. Shmyrov’s museum preserves and interprets a gulag camp built under Joseph Stalin in 1946 near the city of Perm in the village of Kutschino, Russia. Known as Perm-36, the camp served initially as a regular timber production labor camp. Later, the camp became a particularly isolated and severe facility for high government officials. In 1972, Perm-36 became the primary facility in the country for persons charged with political crimes. Many of the Soviet Union’s most prominent dissidents, including Vladimir Bukovsky, Sergei Kovalev and Anatoly Marchenko, served their sentences there. It was only during the Soviet government’s period of “openness” of Glasnost, under President Mikael Gorbachev, that the camp was finally closed in 1987. Although there were over 12,000 forced labor camps in the former Soviet Union, Perm-36 is the last surviving example from the system.
  • Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For

    Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For

    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTIO N AUTHORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky Tönu Parming CONTRACTOR : University of Delawar e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky, Project Director an d Co-Principal Investigato r Tönu Parming, Co-Principal Investigato r COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 621- 9 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or in part fro m funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPLY FOR COPYRIGH T This work has been requested for manuscrip t review for publication . It is not to be quote d without express written permission by the authors , who hereby reserve all the rights herein . Th e contractual exception to this is as follows : The [US] Government will have th e right to publish or release Fina l Reports, but only in same forma t in which such Final Reports ar e delivered to it by the Council . Th e Government will not have the righ t to authorize others to publish suc h Final Reports without the consent o f the authors, and the individua l researchers will have the right t o apply for and obtain copyright o n any work products which may b e derived from work funded by th e Council under this Contract . ii EXEC 1 Overall Executive Summary HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTION by Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delawar e d Tönu Parming, University of Marylan August 1, 1975, after more than two years of intensive negotiations, 35 Head s of Governments--President Ford of the United States, Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada , Secretary-General Brezhnev of the USSR, and the Chief Executives of 32 othe r European States--signed the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperatio n in Europe (CSCE) .
  • Dissidents Versus Communists

    Dissidents Versus Communists

    DISSIDENTS VERSUS COMMUNISTS An Examination of the Soviet Dissidence Movement Matthew Williams Professor Transchel History 419 May 12, 2016 Williams 1 On February 25, 1956, Nikita Khrushchev gave a speech to the Twentieth Congress and to the Communist Party stating that Joseph Stalin was responsible for all of the empire’s then-current issues. He also gave insight into the criminal actions performed by the man during his lifetime. This speech was called the “Secret Speech” as it was not publicized at first, but once word got out about the true nature of Stalin, people began to doubt everything they knew to be true. Khrushchev decreased the censorship and restrictions on people and also freed millions of political prisoners from Gulags, beginning what would come to be referred to as the “thaw”. Many people had practically worshipped Stalin and knew him to represent the Communist party’s creed of infallibility. The tarnishing of his image led many people to seriously doubt the capabilities of the party.1 As truths came out and people began to discuss issues, there was increasing dissatisfaction with the Communist Party and a community of dissenters was born. This community of dissenters would ultimately keep the fight for freedom going long after the end of the thaw era, until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. This paper will examine the dissent movement, from its roots in the end of the Stalin era to the collapse in 1991; it will address how the dissent movement came into being, and how it evolved as new challenges were presented to it.
  • Human Rights and History a Challenge for Education

    Human Rights and History a Challenge for Education

    edited by Rainer Huhle HUMAN RIGHTS AND HISTORY A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION edited by Rainer Huhle H UMAN The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Convention of 1948 were promulgated as an unequivocal R response to the crimes committed under National Socialism. Human rights thus served as a universal response to concrete IGHTS historical experiences of injustice, which remains valid to the present day. As such, the Universal Declaration and the Genocide Convention serve as a key link between human rights education and historical learning. AND This volume elucidates the debates surrounding the historical development of human rights after 1945. The authors exam- H ine a number of specific human rights, including the prohibition of discrimination, freedom of opinion, the right to asylum ISTORY and the prohibition of slavery and forced labor, to consider how different historical experiences and legal traditions shaped their formulation. Through the examples of Latin America and the former Soviet Union, they explore the connections · A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION between human rights movements and human rights education. Finally, they address current challenges in human rights education to elucidate the role of historical experience in education. ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 © Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” Stiftung “Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft” Lindenstraße 20–25 10969 Berlin Germany Tel +49 (0) 30 25 92 97- 0 Fax +49 (0) 30 25 92 -11 [email protected] www.stiftung-evz.de Editor: Rainer Huhle Translation and Revision: Patricia Szobar Coordination: Christa Meyer Proofreading: Julia Brooks and Steffi Arendsee Typesetting and Design: dakato…design. David Sernau Printing: FATA Morgana Verlag ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 Berlin, February 2010 Photo Credits: Cover page, left: Stèphane Hessel at the conference “Rights, that make us Human Beings” in Nuremberg, November 2008.
  • Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation

    Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation

    Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation J. MICHAEL WALLER "They write I'm the mafia's godfather. It was Vladimir Ilich Lenin who was the real organizer of the mafia and who set up the criminal state." -Otari Kvantrishvili, Moscow organized crime leader.l "Criminals Nave already conquered the heights of the state-with the chief of the KGB as head of a mafia group." -Former KGB Maj. Gen. Oleg Kalugin.2 Introduction As the United States and Russia launch a Great Crusade against organized crime, questions emerge not only about the nature of joint cooperation, but about the nature of organized crime itself. In addition to narcotics trafficking, financial fraud and racketecring, Russian organized crime poses an even greater danger: the theft and t:rafficking of weapons of mass destruction. To date, most of the discussion of organized crime based in Russia and other former Soviet republics has emphasized the need to combat conven- tional-style gangsters and high-tech terrorists. These forms of criminals are a pressing danger in and of themselves, but the problem is far more profound. Organized crime-and the rarnpant corruption that helps it flourish-presents a threat not only to the security of reforms in Russia, but to the United States as well. The need for cooperation is real. The question is, Who is there in Russia that the United States can find as an effective partner? "Superpower of Crime" One of the greatest mistakes the West can make in working with former Soviet republics to fight organized crime is to fall into the trap of mirror- imaging.
  • Homosexuality in the USSR (1956–82)

    Homosexuality in the USSR (1956–82)

    Homosexuality in the USSR (1956–82) Rustam Alexander Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2018 School of Historical and Philosophical Studies Faculty of Arts The University of Melbourne Abstract The history of Soviet homosexuality is largely unexplored territory. This has led some of the few scholars who have examined this topic to claim that, in the period from Stalin through to the Gorbachev era, the issue of homosexuality was surrounded by silence. Such is the received view and in this thesis, I set out to challenge it. My investigation of a range of archival sources, including reports from the Soviet Interior Ministry (MVD), as well as juridical, medical and sex education literature, demonstrates that although homosexuality was not widely discussed in the broader public sphere, there was still lively discussion of it in these specialist and in some cases classified texts, from 1956 onwards. The participants of these discussions sought to define homosexuality, explain it, and establish their own methods of eradicating it. In important ways, this handling of the issue of homosexuality was specific to the Soviet context. This thesis sets out to broaden our understanding of the history of official discourses on homosexuality in the late Soviet period. This history is also examined in the context of and in comparison to developments on this front in the West, on the one hand, and Eastern Europe, on the other. The thesis draws on the observation made by Dan Healey, the pioneering scholar of Russian and Soviet sexuality, that in the Soviet Union after Stalin’s death a combination of science and police methods was used to strengthen heterosexual norms in the Soviet society.
  • The Blogization of Journalism

    The Blogization of Journalism

    DMITRY YAGODIN The Blogization of Journalism How blogs politicize media and social space in Russia ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Board of School of Communication, Media and Theatre of the University of Tampere, for public discussion in the Lecture Room Linna K 103, Kalevantie 5, Tampere, on May 17th, 2014, at 12 o’clock. UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE DMITRY YAGODIN The Blogization of Journalism How blogs politicize media and social space in Russia Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1934 Tampere University Press Tampere 2014 ACADEMIC DISSERTATION University of Tampere School of Communication, Media and Theatre Finland Copyright ©2014 Tampere University Press and the author Cover design by Mikko Reinikka Distributor: [email protected] http://granum.uta.fi Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1934 Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 1418 ISBN 978-951-44-9450-5 (print) ISBN 978-951-44-9451-2 (pdf) ISSN-L 1455-1616 ISSN 1456-954X ISSN 1455-1616 http://tampub.uta.fi Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy – Juvenes Print 441 729 Tampere 2014 Painotuote Preface I owe many thanks to you who made this work possible. I am grateful to you for making it worthwhile. It is hard to name you all, or rather it is impossible. By reading this, you certainly belong to those to whom I radiate my gratitude. Thank you all for your attention and critique, for a friendly talk and timely empathy. My special thanks to my teachers. To Ruslan Bekurov, my master’s thesis advisor at the university in Saint-Petersburg, who encouraged me to pursue the doctoral degree abroad. To Kaarle Nordenstreng, my local “fixer” and a brilliant mentor, who helped me with my first steps at the University of Tampere.
  • Checklist for the Moscow Summit,Briefing

    Checklist for the Moscow Summit,Briefing

    65 1 May 20,1988 CHECKLIST FOR THE MOSCOW SUMMIT,BRIEFING From May 29 to June 2,1988, Ronald Reagan will be in Moscow for his fourth meeting with Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev. The first meeting, in Geneva in 1985, restored United States-Soviet summit dialogue after a six-year hiatus caused by the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the terminal illness of three Soviet leaders. Reagan and Gorbachev met again in Reykjavik in 1986. That meeting broke down over Soviet insistence that the U.S. abandon its Strategic Defense Initiative. The third summit; .atwhichathe Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was signed, was held in Washington last December. With this fourth Reagan-Gorbachev summit, Reagan will have met the Soviet leader more times than any American President has met any other Soviet leader. In an important sense, therefore, this summit is almost routine. Dramatic agreements should not be expected, nor are they desirable. In keeping with this the Moscow summit should be deliberately low-key. Reagan should downplay arms control issues, except to insist on full Soviet compliance with the INF Treaty and to insist that any strategic arms agreement must include provisions for strategic defense deployment. Items of U.S. Concern. Reagan should emphasize agenda items reflecting U.S. concern over Soviet expansionism abroad and human rights abuses at home. He forcefully should express U.S. opposition to Soviet support for wars that anti-democratic and anti-Western regimes wage against their own peoples. He should tell Gorbachev that the U.S. expects Moscow to end all involvement in Afghanistan; stop its military aid to Nicaragua and pull Soviet-bloc advisors out of that country; support internationally supervised elections in Mozambique and Angola, along with a withdrawal of Soviet and Cuban troops from the latter country; refrain from encouraging the Philippine communist rebels; and end genocide being committed in Ethiopia by the Soviet client regime of the dictator Mengistu Haile Maria.
  • Russian Novels in Marathi Polysystem 87

    Russian Novels in Marathi Polysystem 87

    RUSSIAN NOVELS IN MARATHI POLYSYSTEM 87 Chapter IV: RUSSIAN NOVELS IN MARATHI POLYSYSTEM The Marathi polysystem created a subsystem of translated literature in the historical colonial context. It also created a space for Russian literature within the subsystem of translated literature as a result of the factors mentioned in the last chapter. This chapter attempts to analyse the trends of translation of some representative Russian texts in Marathi polysystem. We conduct this study with concrete literary works translated into Marathi and try to find out exactly which literary works have been entered into Marathi polysystem since 1932. We need to analyse the factors, which played a decisive role in the selection of these works by Marathi polysystem. It is important to determine the function of Russian literature (Novels, Short Stories and Dramas) in Marathi polysystem. This is what we attempt to touch in our next three chapters. II Russian Literature: A Brief Historical Sketch Before we analyse the translations of Russian literary works in the Marathi polysystem, it becomes essential for us to have a brief historical view of the Russian literature. An account of the development of Russian literary polysystem acquaints us with the process of its formation as well as the major events and literary creations in Russia. This shows us how vast the Russian polysystem is and what part of it has entered into Marathi polysystem through translations. Secondly, this also helps us to define the status of the literary texts (chosen for translation into Marathi) in Russian polysystem. Then eventually we can compare it with the status/role/function of the translated text in the Marathi polysystem.
  • The Vexing Case of Igor Shafarevich, a Russian Political Thinker

    The Vexing Case of Igor Shafarevich, a Russian Political Thinker

    birkhauser-science.de Mathematics : Mathematics in the Humanities and Social Sciences Berglund, Krista The Vexing Case of Igor Shafarevich, a Russian Political Thinker In the 1990s “the Shafarevich case” stirred a heated discussion in the mathematics community about a fundamental ethical principle: Can scientific honorary societies make demands to their members concerning their non- scientific views? Another obvious problem becomes topical with the present study and concerns the ethical repercussions of the fact that Shafarevich was demonized without reasonable justification This study, written by a historian of ideas and a specialist of Russian studies, Birkhäuser also introduces Shafarevich’s companionships with some of the most 2012, XIV, 542 p. interesting cultural figures of the Soviet Union in his youth, his extensive 1st activities for defense of human rights and struggle against communist edition propaganda in This is the first comprehensive study about the non-mathematical writings and activities of the Russian algebraic geometer and number theorist Igor Shafarevich (b. 1923). In the 1970s Printed book Shafarevich was a prominent member of the dissidents’ human rights movement and a noted Hardcover author of clandestine anti-communist literature in the Soviet Union. Shafarevich’s public image Printed book suffered a terrible blow around 1989 when he was decried as a dangerous ideologue of anti- Hardcover Semitism due to his newly-surfaced old manuscript Russophobia. The scandal culminated ISBN 978-3-0348-0214-7 when the President of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States suggested that $ 149,99 Shafarevich, an honorary member, resign. The present study establishes that the allegations about anti-Semitism in Shafarevich’s texts were unfounded and that Shafarevich’s terrible Available reputation was cemented on a false basis.
  • E Helsinki Forum and East-West Scientific Exchange

    E Helsinki Forum and East-West Scientific Exchange

    [E HELSINKI FORUM AND EAST-WEST SCIENTIFIC EXCHANGE JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE Sul COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE NINETY-SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 31, 1980 [No. 89] (Committee on Science and Technology) ted for the use of the Committee on Science and Technology and the Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 421 0 WASHINGTON: 1980 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DON FUQUA, Florida, Chairman ROBERT A. ROE, New Jersey JOHN W. WYDLER, New York MIKE McCORMACK, Washington LARRY WINN. JR., Kansas GEORGE E. BROWN, JR., California BARRY M. GOLDWATER, JR., California JAMES H. SCHEUER, New York HAMILTON FISH, JS., New York RICHARD L. OTTINGER, New York MANUEL LUJAN, JR., New Mexico TOM HARKIN, Iowa HAROLD C. HOLLENBECK, New Jersey JIM LLOYD, California ROBERT K. DORNAN, California JEROME A. AMBRO, New York ROBERT S. WALKER, Pennsylvania MARILYN LLOYD BOUQUARD, Tennessee EDWIN B. FORSYTHE, NeW Jersey JAMES J. BLANCHARD, Michigan KEN KRAMER, Colorado DOUG WALGREN, Pennsylvania WILLIAM CARNEY, New York RONNIE G. FLIPPO, Alabama ROBERT W. DAVIS, Michigan DAN GLICKMAN, Kansas TOBY ROTH, Wisconsin ALBERT GORE, JR., Tennessee DONALD LAWRENCE RITTER, WES WATKINS, Oklahoma Pennsylvania ROBERT A. YOUNG, Missouri BILL ROYER, California RICHARD C. WHITE, Texas HAROLD L. VOLKMER, Missouri DONALD J. PEASE, Ohio HOWARD WOLPE, Michigan NICHOLAS MAVROULES, Massachusetts BILL NELSON, Florida BERYL ANTHONY, JR., Arkansas STANLEY N. LUNDINE, New York ALLEN E.
  • Sakharov's Legacy on the Centenary of His Birth

    Sakharov's Legacy on the Centenary of His Birth

    AT A GLANCE Sakharov's legacy on the centenary of his birth Andrey Sakharov was a Soviet physicist who played a leading role in his country's nuclear weapons programme. However, in the 1960s he fell out of favour with the regime due to his activism for disarmament and human rights. On the 100th anniversary of his birth, Sakharov's legacy is more relevant than ever. Since 1988, the European Parliament has awarded an annual prize for freedom of thought named after him. Andrey Sakharov: Scientist, disarmament campaigner, human rights defender Born on 21 May 1921 in Moscow, Andrey Sakharov was a physicist who in 1948 joined the Soviet atomic programme, where he played a leading role in work that led to the country's first successful test of an atomic bomb in 1949. In the 1950s, Sakharov helped to develop the first Soviet hydrogen bomb and the Tsar Bomba, the largest atomic bomb ever exploded. However, by the late 1950s Sakharov was becoming increasingly concerned about the dangers of these new weapons; together with other nuclear scientists, he persuaded the Soviet authorities to sign a partial test ban treaty with the US and UK in 1963, prohibiting atmospheric and underwater nuclear tests. Sakharov's opposition to antiballistic missile defences, which he felt would increase the risk of nuclear war, eventually put him at loggerheads with the Soviet regime. In 1968, Sakharov wrote his 'Reflections on Progress, Peaceful Co-Existence, and Intellectual Freedom', warning of the dangers of nuclear weapons and criticising the repression of dissidents. The essay was never published in the Soviet Union, but typewritten copies circulated widely and reached Western media.