DOCSLIB.ORG

Cfreptiles & Amphibians

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cfreptiles & Amphibians HTTPS://JOURNALS.KU.EDU/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSREPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 27(3):444–445189 • DEC 2020 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATUREAn ARTICLES Amelanistic Tadpole of the . Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: PurpleOn the Road Frog, to Understanding the Nasikabatrachus Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... sahyadrensis Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: A Hypothetical(Anura: Excursion ............................................................................................................................ Nasikabatrachidae)Robert W. Henderson 198 RESEARCH ARTICLES . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and WesternSujith Texas V. ....................... Gopalan and Emily D.A. Henry, EvansJason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida Department of Zoology, ............................................. University College, Trivandrum.Brian J. Camposano, Research Kenneth Centre, L. Krysko, University Kevin M. of Enge,Kerala, Ellen Thiruvananthapuram, M. Donlan, and Michael Kerala, Granatosky India 212([email protected]) CONSERVATION ALERT . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 he Purple Frog. More (Nasikabatrachus Than Mammals ............................................................................................................................... sahyadrensis; Fig. 1) ....................................... 223 . The “Dow Jones Index” of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................... 225 Tand its congener (N. bhupathi) are the only currently recognized speciesHUSBANDRY in the family Nasikabatrachidae and both are endemic to the. Captive Western Care of Ghatsthe Central (Biju Netted andDragon Bossuyt ....................................................................................................... 2003; Shannon Plummer 226 Janani et al. 2017).PROFILE The rheophilous larvae of the Purple Frog hatch and disperse. Kraigduring Adler: June A Lifetime through Promoting monsoon-intensified Herpetology ................................................................................................ Michael L. Treglia 234 streams (Raj et al. 2011; Zachariah et al. 2012). COMMENTARY At 1945 h on 26 July 2019, we encountered an amelanis- . The Turtles Have Been Watching Me ........................................................................................................................ Eric Gangloff 238 tic tadpole (Fig. 2A–B) attached to an inclined rock in a very shallow steam BOOKat Myladumpara, REVIEW Vazhachal Reserve Forest, Kerala, India (10°17'53.6"N,. Threatened Amphibians 76°41'26.8"E; of the World edited 474 by m S.N. asl). Stuart, Its M. Hoffmann, J.S. Chanson, N.A. Cox, morphology clearly matchedR. Berridge, descriptionsP. Ramani, and B.E. of Young N. sahyadrensis .............................................................................................................. in Robert Powell 243 Raj et al. (2011) andCONSERVATION Zachariah RESEARCHet al. (2012), REPORTS: differing Summaries from of Published Conservation Research Reports ................................. 245 normal cryptic tadpolesNATURAL (Thomas HISTORY RESEARCHet al. 2019; REPORTS Fig. :2C–D) Summaries of Published Reports on Natural History ................................. 247 only in abnormal NEWBRIEFScoloration. ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 248 EDITORIAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 251 Relatively few records document albinism or amelanism FOCUS ON CONSERVATION: A Project You Can Support ...............................................................................................Fig. 2. Purple Frog (Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis 252 ) tadpoles in natural in amphibians (Brassaloti and Bertoluci 2008; Toledo 2011) habitat. Dorsal and lateral views of an amelanistic (A–B) and a typically because such abnormalities are rare and individuals with these pigmented individual (C–D). Photographs by S. Harikrishnan (A) and Sujith V. Gopalan (B–D). Front Cover. Shannon Plummer. Back Cover. Michael Kern Totat et velleseque audant mo colorTotat aberrations et velleseque audant are momore easily seen and caught by predators estibus inveliquo velique rerchil (Bechtelestibus inveliquo 1995). velique rerchil erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum fugiatis maionsequat eumque fugiatis maionsequat eumqueAcknowledgements moditia erere nonsedis ma sectiatur moditiaWe thank erere nonsedis the maKerala sectia- State Biodiversity Board for finan- ma derrovitae voluptam, as quos tur ma derrovitae voluptam, as accullabo. cial support for fieldwork through WWF-India, the Kerala Forest Department for issuing a collection permit, and S. Harikrishnan, Govind Girija, and Vivek Chandran for assis- tance during fieldwork. Literature Cited Bechtel, H.B. 1995. Reptile and Amphibian Variants: Colors, Patterns and Scales. Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, Florida, USA. Biju, S.D. and F. Bossuyt. 2003. New frog family from India reveals an ancient biogeographical link with the Seychelles. Nature 425: 711–714. Brassaloti, R.A. and J. Bertoluci. 2008. Albinism in tadpoles of Rhinella ornata Fig. 1. A Purple Frog (Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis) in natural habitat. (Anura, Bufonidae) from southeastern Brazil. Herpetological Bulletin 106: Photograph by Sujith V. Gopalan. 31–33. Copyright is held by the authors. Articles in R&A are made available under a 444 Reptiles & Amphibians ISSN 1098-6324 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. GOPALAN AND EVANS REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • 27(3):444–445 • DEC 2020 Janani, S.J., K. Vasudevan, E. Prendini, S.K. Dutta, and R.K. Aggarwal. 2017. A Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis (Anura: Nasikabatrachidae). Journal of Asia- new species of the genus Nasikabatrachus (Anura, Nasikabatrachidae) from Pacific Biodiversity 12: 144–151. the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats, India. Alytes 34: 1–4. Toledo, L.F. 2011. Albinism in two Amazonian frogs: Elachistocleis carvalhoi Raj, P., V. Deepak, and K. Vasudevan. 2011. Monitoring of breeding in (Microhylidae) and Lithobates palmipes (Ranidae). Herpetology Notes 4: 145–146. Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis (Anura: Nasikabatrachidae) in the southern Zachariah, A., R.K. Abraham, S. Das, K.C. Jayan, and R. Altig. 2012. A Western Ghats, India. Herpetology Notes 4: 11–16. detailed account of the reproductive strategy and developmental stages of Thomas, A., S. Das, and K. Manish. 2019. Influence of stream habitat variables Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis (Anura: Nasikabatrachidae), the only extant on distribution and abundance of tadpoles of the endangered Purple frog, member of an archaic frog lineage. Zootaxa 3510: 53–64. 445.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tadpole Consumption Is a Direct Threat to the Endangered Purple Frog, Nasikabatrachus Sahyadrensis
    SALAMANDRA 51(3) 252–258 30 October 2015 CorrespondenceISSN 0036–3375 Correspondence Tadpole consumption is a direct threat to the endangered purple frog, Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis Ashish Thomas & S. D. Biju Systematics Lab, Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India Corresponding author: S. D. Biju, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 5 July 2014 Accepted: 30 December 2014 by Alexander Kupfer Amphibians across the world are suffering alarming popu- Southeast Asia have witnessed drastic population declines lation declines with nearly one third of the ca 7,300 species caused by overexploitation over the last couple of decades being threatened worldwide (Stuart et al. 2008, Wake & (Warkentin et al. 2008). Often, natural populations are Vredenburg 2008, IUCN 2014). Major factors attributed harvested without regard of the consequences or implica- to the decline include habitat destruction (Houlahan et tions of this practice on the dynamics or sustainability of al. 2000, Sodhi et al. 2008), chemical pollution (Ber ger the exploited populations (Getz & Haight 1989). When 1998), climate change (Adams 1999, Carpenter & Tur- the extent of exploitation is greater than the sustaining ca- ner 2000), diseases (McCallum 2007, Cushman 2006), pacity or turnover rate of a species, there is every possi- and invasive species (Boone & Bridges 2003). The West- bility that the species may become locally extinct, which ern Ghats of India, a global hotspot for amphibian diver- would subsequently have drastic ecological implications sity and endemism (Biju 2001, Biju & Bossuyt 2003), has in the particular region (Duffy 2002, Wright et al. 2006, more than 40% of its amphibian fauna threatened with ex- Carpenter et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Being Highly Sensitive to Environmental Changes
    Being highly sensitive to environmental changes, frogs are a wonderful barometer of the health of Peron's tree frog Recent studies show that four frog species are (Litoria peronii): has a harsh call. Found extinct and, of the 210 species found in Australia, throughout much of seven are critically endangered, eight are south-east Australia. endangered and 12 are vulnerable. Generally soft grey in colour, with small green Frogs are found in almost every habitat, speckles particularly in coastal regions of the east, far south- east and across the north. About 30 frog species are native to Victoria Frogs eat small live insects. Tadpoles can be Growling grass frog (Litoria raniformis) listed as Southern brown tree frog (Litoria ewingi): vegetarian, eating weeds and algae, or carnivorous, endangered and restricted to a handful of sites common across much of southern Victoria. a diet that includes smaller siblings. around Melbourne, including Werribee Open Range High "cree, cree, cree" call, often from grass stems at night Loss and general degradation of habitat, such as Zoo. Distinctive crawark, crok" call. the draining of swamps, and pollution from general Stuttering frog (Mixophyes balbus): this ground- Cane toad (Bufo mannus): introduced to run-off and industrial chemicals, has put many dwelling frog has not been seen in Victoria for 30 Australia in the 1930s in a failed attempt to control species at risk. Chytrid fungus is a threat, as are years, and populations in southern NSW are declining the sugar-cane weevil. Is widespread across north- predators, both native and introduced, such as Listed as vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Tadpoles Really Eat? Assessing the Trophic Status of an Understudied and Imperiled Group of Consumers in Freshwater Habitats
    Freshwater Biology (2007) 52, 386–395 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01694.x OPINION What do tadpoles really eat? Assessing the trophic status of an understudied and imperiled group of consumers in freshwater habitats RONALD ALTIG,* MATT R. WHILES† AND CINDY L. TAYLOR‡ *Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, U.S.A. †Department of Zoology and Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, U.S.A. ‡Department of Biology, Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN, U.S.A. SUMMARY 1. Understanding the trophic status of consumers in freshwater habitats is central to understanding their ecological roles and significance. Tadpoles are a diverse and abundant component of many freshwater habitats, yet we know relatively little about their feeding ecology and true trophic status compared with many other consumer groups. While many tadpole species are labelled herbivores or detritivores, there is surprisingly little evidence to support these trophic assignments. 2. Here we discuss shortcomings in our knowledge of the feeding ecology and trophic status of tadpoles and provide suggestions and examples of how we can more accurately quantify their trophic status and ecological significance. 3. Given the catastrophic amphibian declines that are ongoing in many regions of the planet, there is a sense of urgency regarding this information. Understanding the varied ecological roles of tadpoles will allow for more effective conservation of remaining populations, benefit captive breeding programmes, and allow for more accurate predic- tions of the ecological consequences of their losses. Keywords: amphibian, assimilation, diet, feeding behaviour, omnivory Amphibians are disappearing from the planet at an of the functional roles and trophic status of general- alarming rate (Stuart et al., 2004; Lips et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Little Warriors Join Frog Fight
    THE TELEGRAPH TUESDAY 26 FEBRUARY 2019 10 YOUNG METRO TECE Little warriors join frog fight Around a hundred students from around eight schools attended the Save The Frogs World Summit, held in association with the WISH Foundation, at the MP Birla Planetarium Seminar Hall emember the time when the monsoon nights were accom- R panied by the croaking of a frog on the wet streets? Those days have become a rarity now, pointing to the rapid decline in the number of frogs. Indeed, nearly a third of over 6,963 species of frogs and toads are threatened with extinction, requir- ing our immediate attention. Save The Frogs, a leading am- phibian conservation organisation which has been around for 10 years with a record of over 2,000 environ- Karthikeyan Vasudevan, mental educational events across 57 scientist at the CSIR Centre for countries, gave out this important Cellular and Molecular Biology, message at the Save The Frogs World shows the half-hour film, On The Summit, held for the first time in Brink. The film discussed how Calcutta. The event was held at the habitat destruction and the MP Birla Planetarium Seminar Hall, deadly amphibian disease, in association with the WISH founda- chytridiomycosis, are two of the tion, an NGO based out of Calcutta, Students of Rahara Nibedita Art School crafted several items, including cute and colourful paper frogs, main reasons behind the rapid working dedicatedly towards raising paintings and a painted unbrella as part of the programme to raise awareness on frogs extinction of the purple frog. environmental awareness. I think interactions like these Around a hundred keen students where we share our practical from eight schools attended the sum- knowledge with the young mit.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of the Genus Nasikabatrachus (Anura, Nasikabatrachidae) from the Eastern Slopes of the Western Ghats, India
    Alytes, 2017, 34 (1¢4): 1¢19. A new species of the genus Nasikabatrachus (Anura, Nasikabatrachidae) from the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats, India S. Jegath Janani1,2, Karthikeyan Vasudevan1, Elizabeth Prendini3, Sushil Kumar Dutta4, Ramesh K. Aggarwal1* 1Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CSIR-CCMB), Uppal Road, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, 500007, India. <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>. 2Current Address: 222A, 5th street, Annamalayar Colony, Sivakasi, 626123, India.<[email protected]>. 3Division of Vertebrate Zoology, Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York NY 10024-5192, USA. <[email protected]>. 4Nature Environment and Wildlife Society (NEWS), Nature House, Gaudasahi, Angul, Odisha. <[email protected]>. * Corresponding Author. We describe a new species of the endemic frog genus Nasikabatrachus,from the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats, in India. The new species is morphologically, acoustically and genetically distinct from N. sahyadrensis. Computed tomography scans of both species revealed diagnostic osteological differences, particularly in the vertebral column. Male advertisement call analysis also showed the two species to be distinct. A phenological difference in breeding season exists between the new species (which breeds during the northeast monsoon season; October to December), and its sister species (which breeds during the southwest monsoon; May to August). The new species shows 6 % genetic divergence (K2P) at mitochondrial 16S rRNA (1330 bp) partial gene from its congener, indicating clear differentiation within Nasikabatra- chus. Speciation within this fossorial lineage is hypothesized to have been caused by phenological shift in breeding during different monsoon seasons—the northeast monsoon in the new species versus southwest monsoon in N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom
    lopmen ve ta e l B Williamson, Cell Dev Biol 2012, 1:1 D io & l l o l g DOI: 10.4172/2168-9296.1000101 e y C Cell & Developmental Biology ISSN: 2168-9296 Research Article Open Access The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom Abstract The larval transfer hypothesis states that larvae originated as adults in other taxa and their genomes were transferred by hybridization. It contests the view that larvae and corresponding adults evolved from common ancestors. The present paper reviews the life histories of chordates, and it interprets them in terms of the larval transfer hypothesis. It is the first paper to apply the hypothesis to craniates. I claim that the larvae of tunicates were acquired from adult larvaceans, the larvae of lampreys from adult cephalochordates, the larvae of lungfishes from adult craniate tadpoles, and the larvae of ray-finned fishes from other ray-finned fishes in different families. The occurrence of larvae in some fishes and their absence in others is correlated with reproductive behavior. Adult amphibians evolved from adult fishes, but larval amphibians did not evolve from either adult or larval fishes. I submit that [1] early amphibians had no larvae and that several families of urodeles and one subfamily of anurans have retained direct development, [2] the tadpole larvae of anurans and urodeles were acquired separately from different Mesozoic adult tadpoles, and [3] the post-tadpole larvae of salamanders were acquired from adults of other urodeles. Reptiles, birds and mammals probably evolved from amphibians that never acquired larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibiaweb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth
    AmphibiaWeb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth Created and Illustrated by the 2020-2021 AmphibiaWeb URAP Team: Alice Drozd, Arjun Mehta, Ash Reining, Kira Wiesinger, and Ann T. Chang This introduction to amphibians was written by University of California, Berkeley AmphibiaWeb Undergraduate Research Apprentices for people who love amphibians. Thank you to the many AmphibiaWeb apprentices over the last 21 years for their efforts. Edited by members of the AmphibiaWeb Steering Committee CC BY-NC-SA 2 Dedicated in loving memory of David B. Wake Founding Director of AmphibiaWeb (8 June 1936 - 29 April 2021) Dave Wake was a dedicated amphibian biologist who mentored and educated countless people. With the launch of AmphibiaWeb in 2000, Dave sought to bring the conservation science and basic fact-based biology of all amphibians to a single place where everyone could access the information freely. Until his last day, David remained a tirelessly dedicated scientist and ally of the amphibians of the world. 3 Table of Contents What are Amphibians? Their Characteristics ...................................................................................... 7 Orders of Amphibians.................................................................................... 7 Where are Amphibians? Where are Amphibians? ............................................................................... 9 What are Bioregions? ..................................................................................10 Conservation of Amphibians Why Save Amphibians? .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri's Toads and Frogs Booklet
    TOADSMissouri’s andFROGS by Jeffrey T. Briggler and Tom R. Johnson, Herpetologists www.MissouriConservation.org © 1982, 2008 Missouri Conservation Commission Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Missouri Department of Conservation is available to all individuals without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability. Questions should be directed to the Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102, (573) 751-4115 (voice) or 800-735-2966 (TTY), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Federal Assistance, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Mail Stop: MBSP-4020, Arlington, VA 22203. Cover photo: Eastern gray treefrog by Tom R. Johnson issouri toads and frogs are colorful, harmless, vocal and valuable. Our forests, prairies, rivers, swamps and marshes are Mhome to a multitude of toads and frogs, but few people know how many varieties we have, how to tell them apart, or much about their natural history. Studying these animals and sharing their stories with fellow Missourians is one of the most pleasurable and rewarding aspects of our work. Toads and frogs are amphibians—a class Like most of vertebrate animals that also includes amphibians, salamanders and the tropical caecilians, which are long, slender, wormlike and legless. frogs and Missouri has 26 species and subspecies (or toads have geographic races) of toads and frogs. Toads and frogs differ from salamanders by having an aquatic relatively short bodies and lacking tails at adulthood. Being an amphibian means that tadpole stage they live two lives: an aquatic larval or tadpole and a semi- stage and a semi-aquatic or terrestrial adult stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Nonlethal Predators and the Roles of Competition and Resource Use
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 SPECIES LEVEL DIFFERENCES IN THE ECOLOGY OF TWO NEOTROPICAL TADPOLE SPECIES: RESPONSES TO NONLETHAL PREDATORS AND THE ROLES OF COMPETITION AND RESOURCE USE Zacharia Costa Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/2635 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Zacharia J. Costa All Rights Reserved SPECIES LEVEL DIFFERENCES IN THE ECOLOGY OF TWO NEOTROPICAL TADPOLE SPECIES: RESPONSES TO NONLETHAL PREDATORS AND THE ROLES OF COMPETITION AND RESOURCE USE A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIRMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE AT VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY by ZACHARIA J. COSTA Bachelor of Science, University of California, Davis 2007 Director DR. JAMES VONESH DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia December 13, 2011 Acknowledgments This would not have been possible if not for the support of my parents Kim and Marty Costa. They have always encouraged my pursuit of knowledge and love of the natural world, and are thus directly responsible for my career as a biologist. They have supported me in all of my endeavors often at their own expense, financially and emotionally, and for that I will forever be grateful. I also want to express my deep gratitude and thanks to my advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relative Impacts of Native and Introduced Predatory Fish on a Temporary Wetland Tadpole Assemblage
    Oecologia (2003) 136:289–295 DOI 10.1007/s00442-003-1251-2 COMMUNITY ECOLOGY Matthew J. Baber · Kimberly J. Babbitt The relative impacts of native and introduced predatory fish on a temporary wetland tadpole assemblage Received: 18 October 2002 / Accepted: 7 March 2003 / Published online: 24 April 2003 Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract Understanding the relative impacts of predators tor-prey encounter rates, and thus predation rate. In on prey may improve the ability to predict the effects of combination with a related field study, our results suggest predator composition changes on prey assemblages. We that native predatory fish play a stronger role than C. experimentally examined the relative impact of native and batrachus in influencing the spatial distribution and introduced predatory fish on a temporary wetland am- abundance of temporary wetland amphibians in the phibian assemblage to determine whether these predators landscape. exert distinct (unique or non-substitutable) or equivalent (similar) impacts on prey. Predatory fish included the Keywords Fish assemblages · Functional relationships · eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki), golden top- Larval anurans · Predation · Temporary wetlands minnow (Fundulus chrysotus), flagfish (Jordanella flori- dae), and the introduced walking catfish (Clarias batrachus). The tadpole assemblage included four com- Introduction mon species known to co-occur in temporary wetlands in south-central Florida, USA: the oak toad (Bufo querci- Predators that occupy similar trophic positions may have cus), pinewoods treefrog (Hyla femoralis), squirrel distinct or equivalent effects on prey community dynam- treefrog (Hyla squirella), and eastern narrowmouth toad ics (Lawton and Brown 1993; Morin 1995; Kurzava and (Gastrophryne carolinensis). Tadpoles were exposed to Morin 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Chordates Video Guide
    Branches on the Tree of Life DVD – CHORDATES Written and photographed by David Denning and Bruce Russell ©2005, BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES (THUMBNAIL IMAGES IN THIS GUIDE ARE FROM THE DVD PROGRAM) .. .. To many students, the phylum Chordata doesn’t seem to make much sense. It contains such apparently disparate animals as tunicates (sea squirts), lancelets, fish and humans. This program explores the evolution, structure and classification of chordates with the main goal to clarify the unity of Phylum Chordata. All chordates possess four characteristics that define the phylum, although in most species, these characteristics can only be seen during a relatively small portion of the life cycle (and this is often an embryonic or larval stage, when the animal is difficult to observe). These defining characteristics are: the notochord (dorsal stiffening rod), a hollow dorsal nerve cord; pharyngeal gills; and a post anal tail that includes the notochord and nerve cord. Subphylum Urochordata The most primitive chordates are the tunicates or sea squirts, and closely related groups such as the larvaceans (Appendicularians). In tunicates, the chordate characteristics can be observed only by examining the entire life cycle. The adult feeds using a ‘pharyngeal basket’, a type of pharyngeal gill formed into a mesh-like basket. Cilia on the gill draw water into the mouth, through the basket mesh and out the excurrent siphon. Tunicates have an unusual heart which pumps by ‘wringing out’. It also reverses direction periodically. Tunicates are usually hermaphroditic, often casting eggs and sperm directly into the sea. After fertilization, the zygote develops into a ‘tadpole larva’. This swimming larva shows the remaining three chordate characters - notochord, dorsal nerve cord and post-anal tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Identification
    Amphibian Identification Common frog Adults 6-7 cm. Smooth skin, which appears moist. Coloration variable, includes brown, yellow and orange. Some females have red markings on lower body. Usually has a dark ‘mask’ marking behind the eye. Breeding male Markings also variable, Grey/pale blue including varying amounts throat. of black spots and stripes. Thick front legs. Dark (nuptial) pad on inner toes of Young froglets look like the front feet. Spawn is laid in gelatinous smaller versions of the clumps. adults. Common toad Adults 5-9 cm. Rough skin. Brown with darker markings. Less commonly, some individuals are very dark, almost black, others are brick-red. Breeding pair Males smaller than females. Breeding males can also be distinguished by dark (nuptial) pads on innermost two toes of the front feet. Toad spawn is laid in gelatinous strings, wrapped around vegetation. Less conspicuous than common frog spawn. Makes small hops rather than jumps of common frog. Toadlets transforming from the Juveniles are tadpole stage are often very dark similar colours in colour. to adults, including brick-red. ARG UK Natterjack toad Strictly protected species, requiring Similar in size and appearance to common toad, a licence to handle but with a pale stripe running along the back. or disturb. This is a rare species, unlikely to be found outside specific dune and heathland habitats. On hatching common frog and toad tadpoles Frog Tadpoles are black. As they develop, common frog tadpoles become mottled with bronze, whereas toad tadpoles remain uniformly dark until the last stages of development. Common frog and toad tadpoles generally complete Toad development in the summer, but development rates are variable; some tadpoles may not transform until later in the year, or they may even remain as tadpoles over winter, becoming much larger than normal.
    [Show full text]