DOCSLIB.ORG

Unconventional Warfare in East Tennessee, 1861-1865 Paul A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unconventional Warfare in East Tennessee, 1861-1865 Paul A University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 3-1963 Unconventional Warfare in East Tennessee, 1861-1865 Paul A. Whelan University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Whelan, Paul A., "Unconventional Warfare in East Tennessee, 1861-1865. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1963. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1479 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Paul A. Whelan entitled "Unconventional Warfare in East Tennessee, 1861-1865." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History. LeRoy P. Graf, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: S. J. Folmsbee, Ralph W. Haskins Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) March 6 � 1963 To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Paul Ao Whe lan entitled "Unconventional Warfare in East Tennesseei l861=1865o00 I recom= mend that it be accepted for nine quarter hours of credit in partial fu lfillment of the requirements for the de gree of Master of Arts� with a maj or in Historyo We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: \ De'/f{d.l�an of the Graduate School dc��7/ UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE IN EA ST TENNESSEE. 1861-1865 A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Council of The Univers ity of Tennessee In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Paul A. Whelan March� 1963 PREFAC E President John Fo Kennedy, in a speech to the 1962 graduating class at West Point, mentioned a type of warfare which has become partie- ularly important todayo He observed: This is another type of warfare==new in its intensity, ancient in its origin--war by guerrillas � subversives, insurgents D assassins=­ war by ambush instead of by combat, by infiltrat ion instead of aggression--seeking victory by eroding and exhausting the enemy instead of engaging him. l This study proposes to examine the Civil War in East Tennessee in the light of what we know about unconventional warfare todayo As the name unconventional would imply, the records of such activities are scarce. As a result, many of the facts have had to be pieced together from local histories, memoirs, letters, newspaper accounts� and stories told by the descendants of a number of the participants. Most of their stories have lost nothing in the retelling over the several generations which have elapsed since the Civil War; verification is impossible o Use of such stories has been limited to assisting the author in attempting to get a feeling for the timeso " This study wilt employ some terms and ideas which are specifically the tools of the military historiano These are likely to be unfamiliar to the reader not intimately associated with them" Hence it seems advis- ab le to have available definitions of some of the more important terrnso ! Ex tracted from a speech by President John F. Kennedy, West Point , June 6, 196 2o Cited in Mi litary Review, United States Command and General Staff School, XLII (November0 l962) � ll3 •. ii iii Appendix I contains a glossary of these termswhich are especially re lated to unconventional warfare and which will be used in this study. There is still a controversy among historians as to the type of conflict that was fought between 1861 and 1865. But there is no doubt about the fact that it was a ware and» for the purpose of this study0 war may be defined as " •••a violent interaction between two organized pol itical groups (governments or otherwi se) . "2 Warfare is a particular variety of military activity involving specific forces0 weapons . or tac- tics. It need not emp loy all of a participant9s capability, nor is it necessary for that part which is employed to conform to any specific pro- portion or to be used according to any set pattern. Any war may be fought by using any form of warfare to the degree which each antagonist assumes will result in victory for his particular cause. Unconventional warfare may be defined as that method of warfare used by the indigenous 3 people of an area in opposition to an enemy occupying fo�ce. The effort is usually supported and directed from outside the zone of conflict by a government friendly to those who are resisting. In unconventional war- fare there are three major components: guerrilla activities. evasion and escape, and subvers ion. The technical re quirements of all three have a 2samuel P. Huntington» "Guerrilla Warfare In Theory and Policy0" in Modern Guerri lla Warfare0 Frank Mark Osanka (ed.) (The Free Press of Glencoe , New York, 1962)0 xv-xvi. 3 nepartment of the Army0 Special Warfare u.s. � (U.S. Govern­ ment Printing Office0 Washington0 1962), 8; Air TinTvers1ty, USAF Counter­ insur ency Course, Selected Readin�s (Maxwell Air Force Base�62)0 1-�; �,e ter Paret and John W. Shy , Gue rrilla Warfare and u.s. Military Policy: A Study," The Airman , IV (May • 1962), 11. Also helpful is U.s. Air Force Manual 1r:T, Glossary of Standard Terms (GPO, Washington0 1962). iv common basis p and in Appendix II are discussed in detail from the point of view of guerrilla operations. This study is divided into six chapters . In the first� unconven= tional warfare is re lated to the Civil War background with attention to the problem of its legitimacy as a method of warfare . In the succeeding three chapters � unconventional warfareD as it unfolded in East Tennessee between 1861 and 1865 , is presented in some detail. Chapter two sets the background and ends with Colonel s. P. Carter9s raid in early 1861. Ch apter three continues the narrative through General Amb rose Burnsidevs successful occupation of Knoxville in late 1863. The fourth chapter considers the remaining years of the war. Chapter five is devoted to escapes involving East Tennessee throughout the war. The concluding chapter summarizes the war in East Tennessee from the viewpoint of unconventional warfare. I wish to express my sincere thanks to all of those who have helped and encouraged me in this undertaking. My special thanks to Professor LeRoy P. Graf who directed this study and to Professors Stanley J. Folmsbee and Ralph w. Haskins who patiently gave their time and valuable suggestions . However, for the final product I must assume full responsibility. TA BLE OF CONTENTS CHAP TER PAGE I, A CO NSIDERATION OF UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE 0 0 • 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 1 II. THE KEY ELEMENTS CC»iBINE e 1860=1861 OOOOC000000f)0 18 III. THE APEX--OPEN WARFARE BY INDIGENOUS PER SONNEL • 0 (100000 59 o o o 88 IV, THE CL IMAX o o • o o o o o o o o o o o • 0 0 000000 v. 0 0 0 0 ORGANIZED ESCAPE o 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 VI. SU �R Y AND CONCLUSIONS 00000000 0 • 0 0 0 oooaoo 143 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • • o o 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ooooeo 152 Primary Sources oooooooooooooooooooooo 153 Secondary Sources o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o •• o 157 Studies on Unconventional Warfare 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 166 o 170 APPENDIX I. Glossary o • • o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPENDIX II. Guerri llas� Their Doctrine and Tactics o o o •• o • o 172 v CHAPTER I A CONSIDERATION OF UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE The twentieth century, marked by the Communist Revolution, by two world wars , and by the advent of nuclear power, has produced a renewed interest in all aspects of unconventional warfare . In fact, the interest has been so universal among military forces that perhaps it is losing the 1 distinction of being considered unconventional. Widespread considera- tion of this type of warfare really began with the World War II resist­ ance movements.2 The Russian peasants resisting Hitler's drive to the heart of Russia gained international acclaim . As fascinating and coura- geous as their efforts were , it was left to a little-known Chinese Communist leader� Mao Tse-Tung, who stunned the Western world with a strategic guerrilla victory over the Nationalist government in 19481 to 3 focus attention upon the importance of irregular forces in warfare. I. Unconventional warfare is no substitute for the orthodox 1 John Forth Am ory, Around .!l!!. Edg\2.!, �. ! � Approach � the Problems £! American Foreign Policy (C lar son N. :ott�r, New York , 1961), 7-8. The same not1on is held by c. M. Woodhouse 1n h1s foreward to Otto Heilbrunn 's Partisan Warfare (Frederick A. Praeger, New York , 1962) . 2Most useful studies of unconventional doctrine , strategy, and tactics have appeared after this period . The studies of T. E. Lawrence and Francis Lieber are notable exceptions to which later reference will be made.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CWSAC Report Update
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields Commonwealth of Kentucky Washington, DC October 2008 Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields Commonwealth of Kentucky U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Washington, DC October 2008 Authority The American Battlefield Protection Program Act of 1996, as amended by the Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-359, 111 Stat. 3016, 17 December 2002), directs the Secretary of the Interior to update the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC) Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Acknowledgments NPS Project Team Paul Hawke, Project Leader; Kathleen Madigan, Survey Coordinator; Tanya Gossett, Reporting; Lisa Rupple and Shannon Davis, Preservation Specialists; Matthew Borders, Historian; Renee S. Novak and Gweneth Langdon, Interns. Battlefield Surveyor(s) Joseph E. Brent, Mudpuppy and Waterdog, Inc. Respondents Betty Cole, Barbourville Tourist and Recreation Commission; James Cass, Camp Wildcat Preservation Foundation; Tres Seymour, Battle for the Bridge Historic Preserve/Hart County Historical Society; Frank Fitzpatrick, Middle Creek National Battlefield Foundation, Inc.; Rob Rumpke, Battle of Richmond Association; Joan House, Kentucky Department of Parks; and William A. Penn. Cover: The Louisville-Nashville Railroad Bridge over the Green River, Munfordville, Kentucky. The stone piers are original to the 1850s. The battles of Munfordville and Rowlett’s Station were waged for control of the bridge and the railroad. Photograph by Joseph Brent. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Design by Communication Design, Inc., Richmond, VA 877-584-8395 Cheatham Co
    To Riggins Hill CLARKSVILLE MURFREESBORO and Fort Defiance Scroll flask and .36 caliber Navy Colt bullet mold N found at Camp Trousdale . S P R site in Sumner County. IN G Stones River S T Courtesy Pat Meguiar . 41 National Battlefield The Cannon Ball House 96 and Cemetery in Blountville still 41 Oaklands shows shell damage to Mansion KNOXVILLE ST. the exterior clapboard LEGE Recapture of 441 COL 231 Evergreen in the rear of the house. Clarksville Cemetery Clarksville 275 40 in the Civil War Rutherford To Ramsey Surrender of ST. County Knoxville National Cemetery House MMERCE Clarksville CO 41 96 Courthouse Old Gray Cemetery Plantation Customs House Whitfield, Museum Bradley & Co. Knoxville Mabry-Hazen Court House House 231 40 “Drawing Artillery Across the Mountains,” East Tennessee Saltville 24 Fort History Center Harper’s Weekly, Nov. 21, 1863 (Multiple Sites) Bleak House Sanders Museum 70 60 68 Crew repairing railroad Chilhowie Fort Dickerson 68 track near Murfreesboro 231 after Battle of Stones River, 1863 – Courtesy 421 81 Library of Congress 129 High Ground 441 Abingdon Park “Battle of Shiloh” – Courtesy Library of Congress 58 41 79 23 58 Gen. George H. Thomas Cumberland 421 Courtesy Library of Congress Gap NHP 58 Tennessee Capitol, Nashville, 1864 Cordell Hull Bristol Courtesy Library of Congress Adams Birthplace (East Hill Cemetery) 51 (Ft. Redmond) Cold Spring School Kingsport Riggins Port Royal Duval-Groves House State Park Mountain Hill State Park City 127 (Lincoln and the 33 Blountville 79 Red Boiling Springs Affair at Travisville 431 65 Portland Indian Mountain Cumberland Gap) 70 11W (See Inset) Clarksville 76 (Palace Park) Clay Co.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Davis Books
    UC Davis Books Title Checklist of Reports Published in the Appendices to the Journals of the California Legislature 1850-1970 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wj2k3z4 Author Stratford, Juri Publication Date 2018 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 4.0 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Checklist of Reports Published in the Appendices to the Journals of the California Legislature 1850-1970 Revised Edition 2018 Juri Stratford Copyright © 2016, 2018 Juri Stratford 2 Introduction The California Legislature published reports in the Appendices to the Journals from 1850 to 1970. The present Checklist covers the reports published in the Appendices to the Journals from 1850 to 1970. The Checklist is arranged by volume. The Appendices include reports produced by California executive agencies as well as the California Legislature. In a few instances, the reports include work by the United States federal government or the University of California. Each entry gives the volume number for the report in one of two formats: 1909(38th)(1) This first example indicates Appendix to the 1909 Journals, Volume 1, 38th session. The Legislature stopped assigning session numbers after the 57th session, 1947. For later years, the Appendices were published as separate series of Senate and Assembly volumes. For some years, only Senate volumes were published. 1955(S)(1) This second example indicates Appendix to the 1955 Senate Journals, Volume 1. 3 4 1850(1st)(Journal of the Legislature) McDougall, Lieut. Governor and President, &c.. [G] 1850(1st)(Journal of the Legislature) Special Report of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Underground Railroad in Tennessee to 1865
    The State of State History in Tennessee in 2008 The Underground Railroad in Tennesseee to 1865 A Report By State Historian Walter T. Durham The State of State History in Tennessee in 2008 The Underground Railroad in Tennessee to 1865 A Report by State Historian Walter T. Durham Tennessee State Library and Archives Department of State Nashville, Tennessee 37243 Jeanne D. Sugg State Librarian and Archivist Department of State, Authorization No. 305294, 2000 copies November 2008. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $1.77 per copy. Preface and Acknowledgments In 2004 and again in 2006, I published studies called The State of State History in Tennessee. The works surveyed the organizations and activities that preserve and interpret Tennessee history and bring it to a diverse public. This year I deviate by making a study of the Under- ground Railroad in Tennessee and bringing it into the State of State History series. No prior statewide study of this re- markable phenomenon has been produced, a situation now remedied. During the early nineteenth century, the number of slaves escaping the South to fi nd freedom in the northern states slowly increased. The escape methodologies and ex- perience, repeated over and over again, became known as the Underground Railroad. In the period immediately after the Civil War a plethora of books and articles appeared dealing with the Underground Railroad. Largely written by or for white men, the accounts contained recollections of the roles they played in assisting slaves make their escapes. There was understandable exag- geration because most of them had been prewar abolitionists who wanted it known that they had contributed much to the successful fl ights of a number of slaves, oft times at great danger to themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement and 1796 Constitution • the Area That Became Tennessee
    ••••••••••••TENNESSEE CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY Settlement and 1796 Constitution • The area that became Tennessee was part of the 1663 land grant of North Carolina from Charles II. • In violation of the British Proclamation of 1763 prohibiting settlements west of the Appalachian Mountains, the Watauga settlement was founded in 1771. (T. R's "Great Leap Westward" He wrote that Robertson and Sevier were two of the three greatest leaders in the development west of the mountains, the third being George Rogers Clark) The Watauga Association adopted articles to govern their settlement in 1772—this was the first government west of the mountains. The last British Governor of Virginia, the Earl of Dunmore, wrote in 1774 that Watauga was "a dangerous example to the people of America of forming governments distinct from and independent of his majesty's authority." In 1775, Richard Henderson purchased a large area of Kentucky and Middle Tennessee from the Cherokees--20 million acres for 6 wagon loads of goods. The governments of Virginia and North Carolina refused to recognize it. It was Henderson who was behind the settlement of Nashville in 1779-80. James Robertson led most of the men and the livestock over land to the settlement. John Donelson led a flotilla by water, down the Tennessee River to the Ohio, up the Ohio to the Cumberland, and up the Cumberland to the settlement. The Cumberland Compact was signed in 1780. It provided for the government of the settlement. · After being ignored by North Carolina for many years, the eastern settlements attempt to form the state of Franklin in 1784.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio National Guard Before the Militia Act of 1903
    THE OHIO NATIONAL GUARD BEFORE THE MILITIA ACT OF 1903 A thesis submitted To Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Cyrus Moore August, 2015 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Thesis written by Cyrus Moore B.S., Ohio University, 2011 M.A., Kent State University, 2015 Approved by Kevin J. Adams, Professor, Ph.D., Department of History Master’s Advisor Kenneth J. Bindas, Professor, Ph.D, Chair, Department of History James L Blank, Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter I. Republican Roots………………………………………………………19 II. A Vulnerable State……………………………………………………..35 III. Riots and Strikes………………………………………………………..64 IV. From Mobilization to Disillusionment………………………………….97 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….125 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………..136 Introduction The Ohio Militia and National Guard before 1903 The second half of the nineteenth century witnessed a profound change in the militia in the United States. Driven by the rivalry between modern warfare and militia tradition, the role as well as the ideology of the militia institution fitfully progressed beyond its seventeenth century origins. Ohio’s militia, the third largest in the country at the time, strove to modernize while preserving its relevance. Like many states in the early republic, Ohio’s militia started out as a sporadic group of reluctant citizens with little military competency. The War of the Rebellion exposed the serious flaws in the militia system, but also demonstrated why armed citizen-soldiers were necessary to the defense of the state. After the war ended, the militia struggled, but developed into a capable military organization through state-imposed reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Williamson County Historical Society Journal Article Titles 1970-2018
    Williamson County Archives Williamson County Historical Society Journal: Article titles by issue Page 1 No. 1, Fall 1970 The Williamson County Historical Society by Campbell H. Brown The Courthouses of Williamson County by Herbert L. Harper Recollections of 78 Years in Franklin by Martin Tohrner General N. B. Forrest Cavalry Raid on Brentwood, Tennessee, March 24, 1863 by Buford Gotto The Order of Pale Faces by Virginia Gooch Watson The Franklin Treaty of 1830 by Stephen S. Lawrence Historic Moran Home: Enjoyed by Members of the Same Family for 111 Years by Virginia McDaniel Bowman No. 2, Spring 1971 The Crockett House by George R. Knox The Battle of Franklin by Marion Pearson Kinnard Memories of Sunny Side School by Lula Fain Major Mt. Zion Methodist Episcopal Church by Louise Gillespie Lynch Sumner’s Knob by John Weakley Covington The Tenth Tennessee’s “Battle Flag” by Campbell H. Brown No. 3, 1971-1972 The Edmondson Family by Howard Vallance Jones A Short History of Saint Philip Catholic Church by Valere B. Menefee Green Hill by Walter Stokes, Jr. Soldiers of the War of 1812 by Louise Gillespie Lynch First Inhabitants of Brentwood by Mary Sneed Jones Thomas Stuart by Dorothy Norman Carl The Presbyterian Church in Williamson County by Helen Sawyer Cook The Fates of Three Cousins by Thomas Vance Little Williamson County Archives Williamson County Historical Society Journal: Article titles by issue Page 2 No. 4, 1972-1973 Early Settlers of Williamson County by Helen Sawyer Cook Physicians of Williamson County, Tennessee, 1800-1832 by S. R. Bruesch 1850 Mortality Schedule by Louise Gillespie Lynch The Brown, Ervin, and McEwen Families of Fort Nashborough and Franklin by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Champ Ferguson and the Civil War in Appalachia
    Brian Dallas McKnight. Confederate Outlaw: Champ Ferguson and the Civil War in Appalachia. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2011. 288 pp. $34.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8071-3769-7. Reviewed by Samuel B. McGuire Published on H-Appalachia (September, 2011) Commissioned by Steven Nash (Post-Doctoral Fellow, Department of History, East Tennessee State University) For three decades historians have contributed because a “frontier culture remained strong in the significantly to our understanding of the Civil War isolated children and grandchildren of the origi‐ by assessing the multiple roles of unconventional nal settlers.”[2] Employing an array of archival warfare. Scholars--such as Michael Fellman, Clay sources--including newspaper editorials, manu‐ Montcastle, and Daniel Sutherland--not only re‐ script collections, and postwar trial testimony-- vealed the pervasiveness of irregular warfare on McKnight maintains that Cumberland high‐ the Confederate home front, but also examined landers’ war-induced paranoia and pragmatic the ways in which guerrilla activities shaped offi‐ survivor mentality inflamed the merciless guerril‐ cial war policies and the course of the broader la warfare. He also argues that Ferguson’s conventional conflict.[1] Augmenting this bur‐ Manichean outlook, in which he viewed the con‐ geoning scholarship on Civil War irregulars, Brian flict in stark terms of good versus evil with no McKnight’s biography explores the life of one of middle ground, was founded upon a rudimentary the most notorious pro-Confederate guerrillas, understanding of Old Testament scripture. Champ Ferguson, and sheds light on the chaotic Organized chronologically, McKnight’s study irregular war that wracked many mountain South initially provides insight into Ferguson’s prewar communities.
    [Show full text]
  • End: Grant Sidebar>>>>>
    FINAL History of Wildwood 1860-1919 (chapter for 2018 printing) In the prior chapter, some of the key factors leading to the Civil War were discussed. Among them were the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the McIntosh Incident in 1836, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which led to “the Bleeding Kansas” border war, and the Dred Scott case which was finally decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1856. Two books were published during this turbulent pre-war period that reflected the conflicts that were brewing. One was a work of fiction: Uncle Tom’s Cabin or a Life Among the Lowly by Harriet Beecher Stowe published in 1852. It was an anti-slavery novel and helped fuel the abolitionist movement in the 1850s. It was widely popular with 300,000 books sold in the United States in its first year. The second book was nonfiction: Twelve Years a Slave was the memoir of Solomon Northup. Northup was a free born black man from New York state who was kidnapped in Washington, D.C. and sold into slavery. He was in bondage for 12 years until family in New York secretly received information about his location and situation and arranged for his release with the assistance of officials of the State of New York. His memoir details the slave markets, the details of sugar and cotton production and the treatment of slaves on major plantations. This memoir, published in 1853, gave factual support to the story told in Stowe’s novel. These two books reflected and enhanced the ideological conflicts that le d to the Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ire I M R Rtl 8L Tr 0
    The ire I m r rtl 8l tr 0 Lieutenant Cabnet ary B. Griffin “War is the redm of chance. No other human activity gives it greater scope: no other has such incessant and varied dealings with this intruder. Chance makes. everything more uncertain and interferes with the whole course of events.” So wrote Karl von CIausewitz in his clas.sie, On WQ~. This inherent uncertainty in war, when combined with exertion, danger, and chance, produces an ever- present friction. The commander’s role throughout military ?&story has been to reduce the uncertainties of war for his own side and increase them for his enemy. Notwithstanding great advances in the arts and sciences of command and control, the best commanders have traditionally used trusted subordinates as extensions of their own minds as a way of penetrating the fog of war. This technique has come to be called the “directed telescope.‘” The Directed TeiescQpe: A ~~~~~~~om~~Element orf .E:fectiue Command, by Lieutenant Colonel Gary I3 Griffin, was first pubhsbed by the Combat Studies Institute in I985 a8 a CSL Report. Since its publication, 2Yz.eDirected TePescope has been widely read across our Army and quite a few others, amd as the Persian Gulf operatians began several months ago, the study took on a particular relevance and timeliness. Lientenant~ Colonel Griffin examines the historic rote played by liaison officers, aides-de-camp, and staff observers as extensions of the commander. The study focuses on the relationship between several great commanders and their liaison of&ens, as well as the systems, techniques, and organizations they employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Commencement
    WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY Commencement THE GRADUATION EXERCISES MONDAY, MAY THE NINETEENTH TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN THE GRADUATION EXERCISES MONDAY, MAY THE NINETEENTH TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN NINE O’CLOCK IN THE MORNING THOMAS K. HEARN, JR. PLAZA THE CARILLON: “Carillon de Longpont” ............................................................ Louis Vierne Raymond Ebert (’60), University Carillonneur Bradley Burgin Hicks (’14), Student Carillonneur THE WELCOME ............................................................................Faculty Marshal and Members of the Class of 2014 THE PROCESSIONAL ...........................................................Led by Head Faculty Marshals THE OPENING OF COMMENCEMENT ..................................................... Nathan O. Hatch President THE PRAYER OF INVOCATION ..............................................The Reverend Timothy L. Auman University Chaplain GREETINGS FROM THE CLASS OF 2014 ................................................Jacqueline Sutherland Student Government President THE ADDRESS: “The Importance of a Truly Free Press” ..........................................Jill E. Abramson Former Executive Editor, The New York Times THE HONORING OF RETIRING FACULTY FROM THE REYNOLDA CAMPUS Mary K. DeShazer, Ph.D., Professor of English and Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies Claire H. Hammond, Ph.D., Professor of Economics James J. Kuzmanovich, Ph.D., Professor of Mathematics Candyce C. Leonard, Ph.D., Professor of Communication Joseph O. Milner, Ph.D., Professor of Education
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Knoxville's Past
    Th e Future of Knoxville’s Past Historic and Architectural Resources in Knoxville, Tennessee Knoxville Historic Zoning Commission October 2006 Adopted by the Knoxville Historic Zoning Commission on October 19, 2006 and by the Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission on November 9, 2006 Prepared by the Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission Knoxville Historic Zoning Commissioners J. Nicholas Arning, Chairman Scott Busby Herbert Donaldson L. Duane Grieve, FAIA William Hoehl J. Finbarr Saunders, Jr. Melynda Moore Whetsel Lila Wilson MPC staff involved in the preparation of this report included: Mark Donaldson, Executive Director Buz Johnson, Deputy Director Sarah Powell, Graphic Designer Jo Ella Washburn, Graphic Designer Charlotte West, Administrative Assistant Th e report was researched and written by Ann Bennett, Senior Planner. Historic photographs used in this document are property of the McClung Historical Collection of the Knox County Public Library System and are used by MPC with much gratitude. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . .5 History of Settlement . 5 Archtectural Form and Development . 9 Th e Properties . 15 Residential Historic Districts . .15 Individual Residences . 18 Commercial Historic Districts . .20 Individual Buildings . 21 Schools . 23 Churches . .24 Sites, Structures, and Signs . 24 Property List . 27 Recommenedations . 29 October 2006 Th e Future Of Knoxville’s Past INTRODUCTION that joined it. Development and redevelopment of riverfront In late 1982, funded in part by a grant from the Tennessee sites have erased much of this earlier development, although Historical Commission, MPC conducted a comprehensive there are identifi ed archeological deposits that lend themselves four-year survey of historic sites in Knoxville and Knox to further study located on the University of Tennessee County.
    [Show full text]