UC Davis Books
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Camp Stoneman, Pittsburg, California
Camp Stoneman, Pittsburg, California Camp Stoneman was located in N. California, at Pittsburg, 40 miles NE of San Francisco. A staging area and rifle range for troop training by the Army, and established as a Class I installation, it was also used as a facility of the San Francisco Port of Embarkation. Though the sound of thousands of marching feet is but a memory today, Camp Stoneman was once the principal "jumping off point" for more than one million soldiers destined for operations in WW II's Pacific Theater, and again several years later during the Korean War. Consisting of more than 2,500 sprawling acres, it sprang to life in 1942. Its function was to rapidly process troops for overseas service by completing paperwork and updating records, arranging for last minute training, providing medical and dental care, and issuing and servicing equipment. Camp Stoneman, named after George Stoneman, a Civil War cavalry commander and early Governor of California, had a lifespan of only 12 years, being activated on May 28, 1942, and decommissioned on August 30,1954. The day-to-day operation of the camp was a tremendous task. In addition to receiving, processing and embarking thousands of troops each week, waiting soldiers were housed and fed, medical and dental examinations and corrective work conducted, clothing, equipment and records put in proper order, final training provided, and numerous other odds and ends taken care of. Camp Stoneman consisted of more than 800 cream and khaki-colored buildings, capable of accommodating 20,000 troops at peak capacity. The average length of a stay for troops bound overseas was one to two weeks. -
Systems of California Indian Servitude Under US Rule
‘‘Unholy Traffic in Human Blood and Souls’’: Systems of California Indian Servitude under U.S. Rule BENJAMIN MADLEY The author teaches in the history department and American Indian Studies Program at the University of California, Los Angeles. From 1846 onward, at least 20,000 California Indians worked in varied forms of bondage under U.S. rule. This essay provides the first article-length survey of the statewide rise and fall of California’s systems of Indian servitude under U.S. rule, including their Russo-Hispanic antecedents, establishment under martial law, expansion under civilian rule, and dismantling by state and federal authorities. Further, this article proposes the first taxonomy of these systems and, in conclusion, discusses how California Indian servitude illuminates the histories of California, the western United States, the nation as a whole, and the western hemisphere while suggesting new analytical methods and research directions. Key words: American Indian labor, American Indian slavery, California Indians, California legal history, indentured servitude, unfree labor The author thanks Stephen Aron, Colin Calloway, Boyd Cothran, Robin Derby, Bruce Duthu, John Faragher, Daniel Lynch, Timothy Macholz, William Marotti, Valerie Mat- sumoto, Preston McBride, Edward Melillo, Aaron O’Connell, Carla Pestana, Jesse Philips, Arthur Rolston, Peter Stacey, Kevin Terraciano, Owen Williams, Craig Yirush, Judy Yung, Natale Zappia, and the Pacific Historical Review’s editors and anonymous reviewers. Michael Magliari provided patient and invaluable guidance. Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 83, No. 4, pages 626–667. ISSN 0030-8684, eISSN 1533-8584 © 2014 by the Pacific Coast Branch, American Historical Association. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press’s Rights and Permissions website, at http://www.ucpressjournals. -
Here at the Nob Hill Gazette, We're Ringing in 2017 with Our Annual A-List of All the Names We Dropped During the Past Year. W
STORY BY ERIN CARLSON | PRODUCTION & STYLE BY NATASHA CHALENKO | PHOTOGRAPHY BY JERAMIE CAMPBELL Here at the Nob Hill Gazette, we’re ringing in 2017 with our annual A-List of all the names we dropped during the past year. We invited a few of the glitterati to be photographed for the issue, and you’ve probably seen them around: There’s Willie Brown and the ever-fashionable Sonya Molodetskaya! Plus: Dede Wilsey! Riccardo Benavides! Karen Caldwell! Each donned designer get-ups from favorites like Valentino, Dolce & Gabbana and Oscar de la Renta. No A-List would be complete without this crew. “I’d be profoundly disappoint- “I think when people see you ed if my name was not there,” said smiling, having fun —that’s the most Brown, who arrived to the shoot important thing in life,” she said. dressed to slay in a Kiton tuxedo “Life's not easy, as we all know. and Christian Louboutin formal There are moments. There are ups wear slippers. “I’d be devastated! and downs. But if you can go some- Because by comparison, I observe where and dress up, have a smile on the wearing apparel of many of the your face, feel good, that’s a moment other males of San Francisco—and that gives you pleasure.” there’s not a whole lot of people who And perhaps, some love from dress the way the guys dress in New the A-List. York, or the way the guys dress in More-than-honorable mentions Paris or the way, apparently, every in this list's 26th edition: Pamala Italian including Italian farmers and Ted Deikel; Vanessa Getty; dress. -
General Crook's Administration in Arizona, 1871-75
General Crook's administration in Arizona, 1871-75 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Bahm, Linda Weldy Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 11:58:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551868 GENERAL CROOK'S ADMINISTRATION IN ARIZONA, 1871-75 by Linda Weldy Bahm A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 6 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fu lfill ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for per mission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: J/{ <— /9 ^0 JOHN ALEXANDER CARROLL ^ T 5 ite Professor of History PREFACE In the four years following the bloody attack on an Indian encampment by a Tucson posse early in 1871, the veteran professional soldier George Crook had primary responsibility for the reduction and containment of the "hostile" Indians of the Territory of Arizona. -
Civil War Times Article on the Stoneman's Raid
•· ' TIMES HE CAME AS A LIBERATOR-HE LEFT AS A PRISONER The Union General Lost In Georgia By William Harris Bragg STONEMAN RIDES AGAINST MACON IN 1864 he orders came from Union Major General his own force. He was, however, emphatic on William T. Sherman's headquarters. Is one point: the rescue mission was to be under T sued on July 25, 1864, they were clear taken only after Atlanta's last rail artery had been enough. Yankee cavalrymen, striking out from severed. either flank of the Union host investing Atlanta, While accepting its risks, Sherman consid Georgia, would circle toward each other and ered Stoneman's raid a "rash adventure," a meet on the night of July 28, thirty miles below scheme calling fo~ more than he could probably the city. There they would wreck up to five miles accomplish. The expedition plan demanded hard of the Macon railroad, Atlanta's only supply line. marching over hundreds of miles of hostile ter As they did this, Sherman's Army of the Ten ritory, heavy fighting, and the rough work of nessee would move against the same railway railroad destruction, as well as the reduction of six miles below the city. The results were "ex a sizeable town and the capture of a fortified pected to be decisive": Atlanta's defender, Con prison camp-all during the energy-sapping days federate General John Bell Hood-denied com of a hot Georgia July. Were Stoneman and his munications, supplies, and reinforcements - men equal to the task? Their records suggested would be pressed to abandon his complex for not. -
HISTORY of USC OTOLARYNGOLOGY by George B
HISTORY OF USC OTOLARYNGOLOGY By George B. Stoneman, M.D. The University of Southern California was founded in 1880. The College of Medicine of USC was organized May 2, 1885, and in the spring of 1888 the first class was graduated. Although degrees were granted by USC, the College of Medicine remained independent of the University, funding operations by donations from the faculty and student tuition. Instruction was started in a reconverted winery building at 445 Aliso Street in Los Angeles, which was immediately adjacent to the present 101 freeway. The previous occupant of the building had been the Vache Freres Winery. It was expanded to equip the growing school with laboratories, an out-patient clinic and free dispensary. Students dissected cadavers in the same basement quarters that had once been used as a wine cellar. It was a three year curriculum, and there were no matriculation requirements—not even a high school education. The entrance examination usually consisted of an oral test in classical languages at the home of the first dean, Dr. Joseph Widney. The total cost of instruction for three years was $315. The first location of USC College of Medicine was in an old winery building, located at 445 Aliso Street, Los Angeles 1 In 1885 the governor of California was George Stoneman, who was my great-grandfather. He was a retired Civil War Union Major General, who had retired to a 400 acre ranch in San Gabriel, which he named “Los Robles”. One of the graduates of the medical school class of 1898 was Edward M. -
" Geology and the Civil War in Southwestern Virginia
," x--%"* J' : COMMONWEALTH OF P .: ,a & DePnRTMENT OF MINES, MWERALS AND */'? ?.l* .+--t4J Richmand, Virginia \ ,*"'j3 I"r.L" @.<G-*\,&- 2 ,s" VOL. 43 NOVEMBER 1997 NO. 4 GEOLOGY AND THE CIVIL WAR IN SOUTHWESTERN VIRGINIA: UNION RAIDERS IN THE NEW RIVER VALLEY, MAY 1864 Robert C. Whisonant Department of Geology Radford University Radford, VA 24142 INTRODUCTION connections between the geology, geography, and hum= history of this region. This article, part of an ongoing study examining the On Monday, May 9, 1864 - a beautiful sun-splashed &y in relationships between geology and the Civil War in southwestem the mountains of southwestern Virginia - the fargest Civil War Virginia (Whisonant 1996a; 1996b), probes these connections. battle ever fought in that sector of the Old omi in ion erupted at the base of Cloyds Mountain in Pulaski County (Figure 1). Both Yankee and Rebel veterans of that engagement, many of whom SALT, LEAD, AND RAIIS: had fought in larger and more important battfes elsewhere, THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SOUTHWESTERN claimed "that, for fierceness and intensity, Cloyds Mountain VIRGINIA TO THE CONFEDERATE WAR EFFORT exceeded them all" (Humphreys, 1924, cited in McManus, 1989). Of the roughly 9,000 soldiers engaged, 1,226 became When Civil War broke out in 1861, Virginia was by far the casualties. Union killed, wounded, and missing were leading mineral-producing state in the entire Confederacy approximately 10 percent of their forces and Confederate losses (Dietrich, 1970). Among the principal mined materials needed approached an appalling 23 percent. to fight a war in the 1860s were salt, iron, lead, niter (saltpeter), Next day, May 10, another lovely spring day, Northern and and coal (Whisonant, 1996a). -
Report of the Surveyor General 1884–1886
REPORT OF THE SURVEYOR-GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA From August 1, 1884, to August 1, 1886. SACRAMENTO STATE OFFICE, JAMES J. AYERS, SUPT. STATE PRINTING 1886. Page 1 of 26 REPORT. __________ STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OFFICE OF SURVEYOR-GENERAL, SACRAMENTO, August 1, 1886. To his Excellency, George Stoneman, Governor of California: DEAR SIR: In accordance with the requirements of the law relating to the duties of the Surveyor-General, I have the honor to submit the following report of the transactions of this office from August 1, 1884, to August 1, 1886. H. I. WILLEY, Surveyor-General, and ex officio Register of State Land Office. __________ AREA OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA The following statement, the latest procurable, furnished by the United States Surveyor-General for California in 1882, shows that the estimated area of the State of California is 100,500,000 acres, apportioned as follows: Subdivision. Area – Acres. Agricultural and mineral lands surveyed to June 30, 1882…………………………………………….. 61,887,392 Agricultural and mineral lands unsurveyed………………………………………………………………. 26,211,501 Private grants patented…………………………………………………………………………………….. 8,383,375 Private grants not settled…………………………………………………………………………………... 341,650 Indian military reservations………………………………………………………………………………… 318,631 Lakes, islands, bays, and navigable rivers………………………………………………………………. 1,531,700 Swamp and overflowed lands surveyed………………………………………………………………….. 1,635,227 Swamp and overflowed lands unsurveyed………………………………………………………………. 85,524 Salt marsh and tide lands around San Francisco Bay………………………………………………….. 100,000 Salt marsh and tide lands around Humboldt Bay……………………………………………………….. 5,000 Total……………………………… 100,500,000 Page 2 of 26 GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS. From August 1, 1884, to August 1, 1886, applications to purchase school lands have been received and filed as follows: From From From Aug.1, 1880, to Aug.1, 1882, to Aug.1, 1884, to Districts. -
The Civil War Defenses of Washington
A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F. -
Waterman Family Papers, 1839-1906
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf0m3n9804 No online items Guide to the Waterman family papers, 1839-1906 Processed by The Bancroft Library staff The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1997 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Additional Form Available: This finding aid has been filmed for the National Inventory of Documentary Sources in the United States (Chadwyck-Healey Inc.). Note History --History, CaliforniaGeographical (By Place) --California Guide to the Waterman family BANC MSS C-B 491 1 papers, 1839-1906 Guide to the Waterman Family Papers, 1839-1906 Collection number: BANC MSS C-B 491 The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: The Bancroft Library staff Date Completed: ca. 1955-1956 Encoded by: James Lake © 1997 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Waterman Family Papers, Date (inclusive): 1839-1906 Collection Number: BANC MSS C-B 491 Creator: Waterman family Extent: Number of containers: 14 cartons, 17 boxes, 4 volumes and 3 oversize foldersLinear feet: 28 Repository: The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Abstract: Papers of Robert W. Waterman, governor of California, 1887-1891, his wife Jane, and their six children. -
CURRICULUM on CITIZENSHIP Eureka!
State of California – Military Department California Cadet Corps CURRICULUM ON CITIZENSHIP Strand C1: The State of California Level 11 This Strand is composed of the following components: A. California Basics B. California Government C. California History Eureka! “California, Here I Come!” Updated: 15 Feb 2021 California Cadet Corps Strand C1: The State of California Table of Contents B. California Basics .................................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................. 3 B1. California State Government – Executive Branch ........................................................................... 4 B2. California State Government – Legislative Branch ......................................................................... 7 B3. California State Government – Judicial Branch .............................................................................. 8 B4. State: Bill Becomes Law .................................................................................................................. 9 B5. California Governors ..................................................................................................................... 11 B6. Voting and the Ballot Initiative Process ........................................................................................ 19 References ................................................................................................................................................. -
Twenty-Sixth Annual Reunion of The
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REUNION OF THE ASSOCIATION X GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY, AT WEST POINT, NEW YORK. 7fune Ioth/, I895. SAGINAW, MICH. SEEMANN & PETERS, PRINTERS AND BINDERS. 1895. Annual Reunion, June Ioth, 1895. MINUTES OF THE BUSINESS MEETING. WEST POINT, N. Y., JUNE 10th, 1895. The Association milet in room 102 of the Academy Build- ing, at 3.00 o'clock, P. M., and was called to order by Colonel 0. H. Ernst, Corps of Engineers, of the Executive Committee. The roll was next called. ROLL OF MEMBERS. Those present are indicated by a ~. 1823. 1838. *GEORGE S. GREENE. JOHN T. METCALFE. WILLIAM AUSTINE. 1829. JOSEPH SMITH BRYCE. 1839. THOMAS A. DAVIES. ALEXANDER R. LAWTON. 1832. 1840. ERASMUS D. KEYES. STEWART VAN VLIET. GEORGE W. GETTY. 1833. HENRY WALLER. 1841. ZEALOUS B. TOWER. 1834. HORATIO G. WRIGHT. THOMAS A. MORRIS. SCHUYLER HAMILTON. 1835. 1842. JOSEPH H. EATON. GEORGE W. RAINS. THOMAS B. ARDEN. WILLIAM S. ROSECRANS. GUSTAVUS W. SMITH. JOHN S. MCCALMONT. 1837. EUGENE E. MCLEAN. JOSHUA H. BATES. JAMES LONGSTREET. ROBERT B. MCLANE. JAMES W. ABERT, 4 ANNUAL REUNION, JUNE o1th, 1895. 1843. FRANCIS H. BATES. WILLIAM B. FRANKLIN. ROBERT JOHNSTON. GEORGE DESHON. WILLIAM L. CABELL. JOSEPH J. REYNOLDS. CHRISTOPER C. AUGUR. 1851. GEORGE L. ANDREWS. 1844. ALEXANDER PIPER. CALEB HUSE. DANIEL M. FROST. ALEXANDER J. PERRY. ALFRED PLEASANTON. WILLIAM H. MORRIS. SIMON B. BUCKNER. ROBERT E. PATTERSON. 1845. WILLIAM D. WHIPPLE. EDWARD A. PALFREY. WILLIAM F. SMITH. *JOSEPH G. TILFORD. *THOM[AS J. WOOD. FITZ-JOHN PORTER. THOMAS G. PITCHER. 1852. THOMAS L. CASEY. 1846.