DOCSLIB.ORG

Information to Users

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information to Users INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Com pany 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9325494 “War at every man’s door” : The struggle for East Tennessee, 1860—1869. (Volumes I and n) Fisher, Noel Charles, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1993 Copyright ©1993 by Fisher, Noel Charles. All rights reserved. UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 "WAR AT EVERY MAN’S DOOR": THE STRUGGLE FOR EAST TENNESSEE, 1860-1869 VOLUME I DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Noel C. Fisher, B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1993 Dissertation Committee Approved by Allan R. Millett Joan E. Cashin Advisor Michael Les Benedict Department of History Copyright by Noel Charles Fisher 1993 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My list of debts to my advisor, Professor Allan Millett, is quite long, but I would particularly like to thank him for originally pointing me to this project, for making numerous suggestions that greatly increased my understanding of the East Teimessee war, and for encouraging me throughout the entire process. I would also like to thank Professor Joan Cashin for her close questioning of my analyses, her criticisms of style, and her valuable suggestions for further research. My thanks also go to Professor M. Les Benedict for his very helpful comments on Chapters II and VII and for his encouraging me to ask broader questions. There were many people who made the research for this project both fruitful and enjoyable. The staffs of the Tennessee State Library and Archives, the University of Tennessee Library, the McClung Collection, the Southern Historical Collection, the Perkins Library at Duke University, the North Carolina State Archives, the Military History Institute, the National Archives, the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress, and the Federal Records Center in Atlanta were all knowledgeable, friendly, and remarkably efficient. The Alumni Research Fund of the Graduate School at The Ohio State University provided generous funds for travel and research. And Barb and Jerry Ryan made my stay at Durham, North Carolina unforgettably pleasant. My gratitude also goes to the people who encouraged me throughout this project. The Department of History, Ohio Wesleyan University, provided employment at a critical time, and Dr. Jan Hallenbeck, Dr. William Walker, Dr. Richard Spall, Dr. Deborah Van Broekhoven, and Ms. Carol Doubkin all took an interest in my work. Dr. Carl Beamer and Terry Beamer were the best of friends, and they also provided practical help, including the use of their extensive libraiy and aid with statistics. My deepest thanks are reserved for my wife, Angela, who traveled with me, aided me in my research, supported my work, and lived every day of this project. This dissertation is as much hers as mine. u VITA December 11, 1962 ........................................................Bom - Sidney, Nebraska 1985 ..........................................B.S., University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 1987 .................. M.A. in History, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1986-1990 .................. Graduate Teaching Assistant, The Ohio State University 1991-1992 Instructor, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, Ohio PUBLICATIONS ’“Prepare Uiem for My Coming’: General William T. Sherman, Total War, and Pacification in West Tennessee." Tennessee Historical Quarterly 51 (1992): 75-86. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Studies in American Military History - Dr. Allan Millett Nineteenth Century United States - Dr. Merton Dillon, Dr. Joan Cashin European Military History - Dr. Williamson Murray Nineteenth Century United States Diplomacy - Dr. Marvin Zahniser Sub-Saharan African History - Dr. Robert Baum 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................ii VITA .................................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................vi INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................1 CHAPTER PAGE I. "THE WHOLE COUNTRY IS NOW IN A STATE OF REBELLION"..................................................................13 II. "HEWERS OF WOOD AND DRAWERS OF WATER"... 69 in. "WAR AT EVERY MAN’S DOOR" ..................................... 129 IV. "THE LENIENCY SHOWN THEM HAS BEEN UNAVAILING"....................................................................196 V. "TO GUARD AGAINST REAL OR EVEN SUPPOSED DANGER".............................................................................259 VI. "I AM HEARTILY SICK OF EAST TENNESSEE"............328 IV LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. SECTIONAL COMPARISONS, TENNESSEE, 1860 ... 102 2. SECTIONAL DISTINCTIONS, TENNESSEE, 1860 ... 103 3. COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATION...............................106 4. SINGLE REGRESSIONS, VOTE AGAINST SECESSION...........................................................................107 5. MULTIPLE REGRESSIONS, VOTE AGAINST SECESSION.......................................................................... 108 6. SINGLE REGRESSIONS, REGION AND ECONOMIC FACTORS........................................................................... 109 7. TROOP STRENGTHS, CONFEDERATE AND UNION, 1861-1865 ............................................................. 180 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1. EAST TENNESSEE, 1860 .................................................... 16 2. LOCATION OF BRIDGES BURNED, NOVEMBER 8-9, 1860 .................................................................................. 52 3. UNION COUNTER-GUERRILLA OPERATIONS, OCTOBER 1864 .................................................................. 333 4. UNION COUNTER-GUERRILLA OPERATIONS, MAY 1865 ........................................................................... 334 5. UNION SUPPLY LINES, 1863-1865 .................................. 376 VI INTRODUCTION The national pattern of loyalties in the Civil War period presents a more complex picture than the simple divisions of North and South, Union and Confederate, Blue and Gray that are commonly employed. Both before and during the war there existed in the United States a wide belt of territory straddling the Mason-Dixon line in which the sectional alignment was blurred and political loyalties dangerously mixed. This divided region went beyond the border states and such well-known anomalies as West Virginia. Northern unity was threatened by strong Southern sympathies in the lower Midwest, while Confederate authority was challenged by pockets of Unionism in North Carolina, Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, and Tennessee. The danger presented by these disaffected areas has sometimes been exaggerated, but disaffection was nonetheless significant on both sides. Under normal conditions even severe internal differences and divisions could be ignored, accommodated, or adjusted through the political system. But in a war that demanded unity and commitment such divisions were very dangerous. They hampered mobilization, obstructed the operations of the government, and sometimes flared up into overt rebellion. At the same time, the stresses of the war itself accentuated these differences and widened these divisions. 2 The most intractable bastions of Southern Unionism developed in the Appalachians, a region that diverged from the dominant Southern economic and social patterns. This area was characterized neither by the staple crop system of the lower South nor by the rich grain and livestock production of the upper South, and it participated only peripherally in the institution of slavery. These regions were by no means antislavery, and culturally they identified with the South. But neither economic ties, nor political arrangements, nor slaveholder hegemony, nor any other mechanism had integrated them into the Southern system. Furthermore, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brochure Design by Communication Design, Inc., Richmond, VA 877-584-8395 Cheatham Co
    To Riggins Hill CLARKSVILLE MURFREESBORO and Fort Defiance Scroll flask and .36 caliber Navy Colt bullet mold N found at Camp Trousdale . S P R site in Sumner County. IN G Stones River S T Courtesy Pat Meguiar . 41 National Battlefield The Cannon Ball House 96 and Cemetery in Blountville still 41 Oaklands shows shell damage to Mansion KNOXVILLE ST. the exterior clapboard LEGE Recapture of 441 COL 231 Evergreen in the rear of the house. Clarksville Cemetery Clarksville 275 40 in the Civil War Rutherford To Ramsey Surrender of ST. County Knoxville National Cemetery House MMERCE Clarksville CO 41 96 Courthouse Old Gray Cemetery Plantation Customs House Whitfield, Museum Bradley & Co. Knoxville Mabry-Hazen Court House House 231 40 “Drawing Artillery Across the Mountains,” East Tennessee Saltville 24 Fort History Center Harper’s Weekly, Nov. 21, 1863 (Multiple Sites) Bleak House Sanders Museum 70 60 68 Crew repairing railroad Chilhowie Fort Dickerson 68 track near Murfreesboro 231 after Battle of Stones River, 1863 – Courtesy 421 81 Library of Congress 129 High Ground 441 Abingdon Park “Battle of Shiloh” – Courtesy Library of Congress 58 41 79 23 58 Gen. George H. Thomas Cumberland 421 Courtesy Library of Congress Gap NHP 58 Tennessee Capitol, Nashville, 1864 Cordell Hull Bristol Courtesy Library of Congress Adams Birthplace (East Hill Cemetery) 51 (Ft. Redmond) Cold Spring School Kingsport Riggins Port Royal Duval-Groves House State Park Mountain Hill State Park City 127 (Lincoln and the 33 Blountville 79 Red Boiling Springs Affair at Travisville 431 65 Portland Indian Mountain Cumberland Gap) 70 11W (See Inset) Clarksville 76 (Palace Park) Clay Co.
    [Show full text]
  • United Confederate Veterans Association Records
    UNITED CONFEDERATE VETERANS ASSOCIATION RECORDS (Mss. 1357) Inventory Compiled by Luana Henderson 1996 Louisiana and Lower Mississippi Valley Collections Special Collections, Hill Memorial Library Louisiana State University Libraries Baton Rouge, Louisiana Revised 2009 UNITED CONFEDERATE VETERANS ASSOCIATION RECORDS Mss. 1357 1861-1944 Special Collections, LSU Libraries CONTENTS OF INVENTORY SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 BIOGRAPHICAL/HISTORICAL NOTE ...................................................................................... 4 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE ................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF SUBGROUPS AND SERIES ......................................................................................... 7 SUBGROUPS AND SERIES DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................ 8 INDEX TERMS ............................................................................................................................ 13 CONTAINER LIST ...................................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................... 22 APPENDIX B .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Grade-Tennessee History and the History of the US: Industrialization to the Civil Rights Movement Quarter 4 Curriculum Map Scope and Sequence
    Social Studies Quarter 4 Fifth Grade Fifth Grade-Tennessee History and the History of the US: Industrialization to the Civil Rights Movement Quarter 4 Curriculum Map Scope and Sequence Topic Week Weekly Focus Standards WWI and the Great Week 1: Students will identify the causes of the Great Depression, President Herbert Hoover’s role, and its impact on the nation, including: • 5.15, 5.16 Depression US Chapters Consumer credit and debt • Hoovervilles • Mass unemployment • Soup kitchens. Students will also describe how New Deal policies of 6 and 7 President Franklin D. Roosevelt impacted American society with government-funded programs, including: Social Security, expansion and development of the national parks, and creation of jobs. TN in the 20th Week 2: Students will describe the effects of the Great Depression on Tennessee and the impact of New Deal policies in the state (i.e., 5.48 Century TN Chapter 14 Tennessee Valley Authority and Civilian Conservation Corps). WWII Week 3: Students will explain the structures and goals of the governments in Germany and Japan in the 1930s and determine the significance of 5.17, 5.18, US Chapter 8 the bombing of Pearl Harbor and its impact on the U.S. Students will also identify and locate the Axis and Allied Powers, including: • 5.19, 5.21 Germany • Italy • Japan • France • Great Britain • Soviet Union and analyze the significance of the Holocaust and its impact on the U.S. WWII Week 4: Students will examine the reasons for the use of propaganda, rationing, and victory gardens during World War II. 5.20 US Chapter 9 TN in the 20th Week 5: Students will describe Tennessee’s contributions during World War I and World War II, including: the conversion of factories to wartime 5.49 Century TN Chapter 15 production, the importance of Oak Ridge, and the influence of Tennesseans (i.e., Cornelia Fort, Cordell Hull, and Alvin C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Underground Railroad in Tennessee to 1865
    The State of State History in Tennessee in 2008 The Underground Railroad in Tennesseee to 1865 A Report By State Historian Walter T. Durham The State of State History in Tennessee in 2008 The Underground Railroad in Tennessee to 1865 A Report by State Historian Walter T. Durham Tennessee State Library and Archives Department of State Nashville, Tennessee 37243 Jeanne D. Sugg State Librarian and Archivist Department of State, Authorization No. 305294, 2000 copies November 2008. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $1.77 per copy. Preface and Acknowledgments In 2004 and again in 2006, I published studies called The State of State History in Tennessee. The works surveyed the organizations and activities that preserve and interpret Tennessee history and bring it to a diverse public. This year I deviate by making a study of the Under- ground Railroad in Tennessee and bringing it into the State of State History series. No prior statewide study of this re- markable phenomenon has been produced, a situation now remedied. During the early nineteenth century, the number of slaves escaping the South to fi nd freedom in the northern states slowly increased. The escape methodologies and ex- perience, repeated over and over again, became known as the Underground Railroad. In the period immediately after the Civil War a plethora of books and articles appeared dealing with the Underground Railroad. Largely written by or for white men, the accounts contained recollections of the roles they played in assisting slaves make their escapes. There was understandable exag- geration because most of them had been prewar abolitionists who wanted it known that they had contributed much to the successful fl ights of a number of slaves, oft times at great danger to themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Free State of Winston"
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2019 Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston" Susan Neelly Deily-Swearingen University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Deily-Swearingen, Susan Neelly, "Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston"" (2019). Doctoral Dissertations. 2444. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2444 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REBEL REBELS: RACE, RESISTANCE, AND REMEMBRANCE IN THE FREE STATE OF WINSTON BY SUSAN NEELLY DEILY-SWEARINGEN B.A., Brandeis University M.A., Brown University M.A., University of New Hampshire DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History May 2019 This dissertation has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in History by: Dissertation Director, J. William Harris, Professor of History Jason Sokol, Professor of History Cynthia Van Zandt, Associate Professor of History and History Graduate Program Director Gregory McMahon, Professor of Classics Victoria E. Bynum, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History, Texas State University, San Marcos On April 18, 2019 Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • George Henry Thomas (July 31, 1816 – March 28, 1870)
    George Henry Thomas (July 31, 1816 – March 28, 1870) "Rock of Chickamauga" "Sledge of Nashville" "Slow Trot Thomas" The City of Fort Thomas was named in honor of Major General George Henry Thomas, who ranks among the top Union Generals of the American Civil War. He was born of Welsh/English and French parents in Virginia on July 31, 1816, and was educated at Southampton Academy. Prior to his military service Thomas studied law and worked as a law deputy for his uncle, James Rochelle, the Clerk of the County Court before he received an appointment to West Point in 1836. He graduated 12th in his class of 42 in 1840 which William T. Sherman was a classmate. After receiving his commission as a 2nd Lieutenant in the 3rd Artillery Unit, he served the Army well for the next 30 years. He was made 1st Lieutenant for action against the Indians in Florida for his gallantry in action. In the Mexican War, he served under Braxton Bragg in the Artillery and was twice cited for gallantry—once at Monterey and the other at Buena Vista. From 1851-1854 was an instructor of artillery and cavalry at West Point, where he was promoted to Captain. Following his service at Ft. Yuma in the West, he became a Major and joined the 2nd Cavalry at Jefferson Barracks. The Colonel there was Albert Sidney Johnston and Robert E. Lee was the Lt. Colonel. Other officers in this regiment who were to become famous as Generals were George Stoneman, for the Union, and for the CSA, John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Saber and Scroll Journal Volume II Issue III Summer 2013 Saber And
    Saber and Scroll Journal Volume II Issue III Summer 2013 Saber and Scroll Historical Society 1 © Saber and Scroll Historical Society, 2018 Logo Design: Julian Maxwell Cover Design: DeAnna Stevens Cover Image: Sam.C/shutterstock.com Members of the Saber and Scroll Historical Society, the volunteer staff at the Saber and Scroll Journal publishes quarterly. saberandscroll.weebly.com 2 Contents From the Editorial Team 4 The Council House Fight Sounded the Death Knell to the Comancheria, by Lisa Bjorneby 5 Mining Picks and Baseball Bats: The Unique Sports Culture of Butte, MT , by Kevin Edgar 23 American Women in the 1950s: The Years Between the War and Liberation, by Corinne Fox 30 Sisterhood of Courage: African American Women and Their Efforts to Aid Union Forces in the Civil War, by Lynn Gilland 37 Manipulating Images of the North: Union Public Diplomacy in Europe, by Thomas Rynard 49 The Early Years of Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson and the Impact on His Life, by Beth White 66 The United States Army’s Use of Military Working Dogs (MWD) in Vietnam, by Frank Hoeflinger 76 Historiography of Falkirk (1298) as the Predecessor to Infantry Dominance, by Scott Manning 84 Mithridates I: History’s Forgotten Conqueror, by Cam Rea 95 Even if the World Had Paid Attention, Nothing Would Have Changed: If the Armenian Genocide Had Not Been Forgotten, by Jack Sigman 107 Book Reviews 117 3 From the Editorial Team: Welcome to the sixth issue of the American Public University Sys- tem (APUS)’s Saber and Scroll Journal. This issue resulted from an “open” call for papers and therefore contains an eclectic mix of outstanding feature articles which range from an in-depth analy- sis of Mithridates I’s rise to power in Parthia, a mighty kingdom of the ancient near east to a feature devoted to the history of mil- itary war dogs – man’s best friends in the service to our country.
    [Show full text]
  • A Murder in Kentucky In
    A Murder in Kentucky http://civilwar150.longwood.edu In late September 1862, most of the nation’s attention was focused on Kentucky, where Confederate forces under General Braxton Bragg were advancing into the central region of the state, while Edmund Kirby-Smith’s command moved into Eastern Kentucky. As Bragg’s army occupied Bardstown, a Union force under General Don Carlos Buell raced northward from Tennessee in a frantic effort to reach Louisville before the Confederates could occupy that strategically important city. On September 25 Buell’s force arrived in Louisville, beating Bragg in the race to the city. The Federals still had much work to do over the following days in order to complete the city’s defenses in the event of a southern attack. Buell also sent a portion of his force towards the Kentucky capital of Frankfort, in an effort to prevent Bragg and Smith from uniting their commands. Buell eventually moved his troops southward against Bragg, which would culminate in the October 8th battle of Perryville. As the Federals strengthened Louisville’s defenses, a bizarre confrontation would occur between two Union generals that would leave one of the men dead. Union Brigadier General Jefferson C. Davis had been born in 1828 and served in the Mexican War, where he earned a promotion to lieutenant. At the outbreak of the Civil War he took part in the defense of Fort Sumter, before leading units at the battles of Wilson’s Creek and Pea Ridge and subsequently being assigned to the command of Major General William Nelson in Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Champ Ferguson and the Civil War in Appalachia
    Brian Dallas McKnight. Confederate Outlaw: Champ Ferguson and the Civil War in Appalachia. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2011. 288 pp. $34.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8071-3769-7. Reviewed by Samuel B. McGuire Published on H-Appalachia (September, 2011) Commissioned by Steven Nash (Post-Doctoral Fellow, Department of History, East Tennessee State University) For three decades historians have contributed because a “frontier culture remained strong in the significantly to our understanding of the Civil War isolated children and grandchildren of the origi‐ by assessing the multiple roles of unconventional nal settlers.”[2] Employing an array of archival warfare. Scholars--such as Michael Fellman, Clay sources--including newspaper editorials, manu‐ Montcastle, and Daniel Sutherland--not only re‐ script collections, and postwar trial testimony-- vealed the pervasiveness of irregular warfare on McKnight maintains that Cumberland high‐ the Confederate home front, but also examined landers’ war-induced paranoia and pragmatic the ways in which guerrilla activities shaped offi‐ survivor mentality inflamed the merciless guerril‐ cial war policies and the course of the broader la warfare. He also argues that Ferguson’s conventional conflict.[1] Augmenting this bur‐ Manichean outlook, in which he viewed the con‐ geoning scholarship on Civil War irregulars, Brian flict in stark terms of good versus evil with no McKnight’s biography explores the life of one of middle ground, was founded upon a rudimentary the most notorious pro-Confederate guerrillas, understanding of Old Testament scripture. Champ Ferguson, and sheds light on the chaotic Organized chronologically, McKnight’s study irregular war that wracked many mountain South initially provides insight into Ferguson’s prewar communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing with Primary Sources Grade Level: Standards Or Objectives
    Assessing with Primary Sources Grade Level: High School (Grades 11-12) Standards or CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.9-10.6 Objectives: Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose. Library of Congress Resources: “SPEECH OF Mr. EMERSON ETHERIDGE, AT PHILADELPHIA” Democrat and Sentinel. (Ebensburg, Pa.), September 28, 1864, Page 1 http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn86071378/1864-09-28/ed-1/seq-1/ Topic Background: Henry Emerson Etheridge served one term in the Tennessee House of Representatives and three terms in the U.S. House of Representatives. When the Civil War began, Etheridge remained loyal to the Union. As his third term was ending in March 1861, he was elected clerk of the House of Representatives, where he served until December 1863. Although he staunchly supported the war to preserve the Union, Etheridge broke with President Abraham Lincoln over the issue of emancipation. His position placed him among the Conservative Unionists of Tennessee. The presidential race of 1864 was between Republican candidate, incumbent President Abraham Lincoln, and the Democratic candidate, George B. McClellan, Lincoln's former commander of the Army of the Potomac. Excerpted from: http://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/entry.php?rec=441 Source(s) Used: The source used for this assessment is a newspaper article from the Democrat and Sentinel newspaper in Edensburg, Pennsylvania, dated September 28, 1864. The article appears on the front page and gives a complete account of a speech given by Mr. Ethridge. At the time of the speech, he was no longer a Representative nor the clerk of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Historic Novels in Understanding Desertion in the Civil War
    Wright 1 The Role of Historic Novels in Understanding Desertion in the Civil War Presented to the History Department at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo by Caitlin Wright March, 2012 © 2012 Caitlin Wright Wright 2 In 1862 John Esten Cooke, a Confederate officer and later novelist, witnessed a young man accused of desertion, admit to it, and be sentenced to death by General J.E.B. Stuart. General Stuart was one of the most respected generals of the entire Confederacy and played integral parts in several major battles, including Gettysburg. Of Stuart’s sentiments towards desertion, Cooke wrote, “Desertion…[is] one of the deadliest crimes which a human being could be guilty.”1 Once the unnamed officer realized he had been condemned to be hanged on a tree, he started begging and pleading to be saved. He claimed he had left for Maryland and been forced to fight against the South because he had nothing to eat. Stuart hesitated after hearing his story and then turned the matter over to General Lee who, Cooke claimed, only inflicted the death penalty when he could not avoid doing so.2 In 1863, George H. Gordon, a Union soldier, witnessed the execution of a ringleader of a group of deserters. The other five had been pardoned by the President and returned to their respective units, but the instigator had been condemned to death. As the corpse was rolled into the prepared coffin, Gordon commented, “The law had been defied and so, at last, at the law was vindicated.”3 These are not isolated and chance incidents; desertion was prevalent throughout the Civil War, regardless of which army men fought for, and the punishments were usually harsh.
    [Show full text]
  • “Sunset” Cox and the Etheridge Conspiracy of 1863
    Power Grab: “Sunset” Cox and the Etheridge Conspiracy of 1863 By Fergus M. Bordewich The National Capital Washington DC, winter 1863-64, just after "Freedom" had been installed Shortly after noon on the afternoon of December 2, 1863 workmen hoisted the classical head of a goddess over the scree of construction detritus, blocks of marble, and thousands of expectant, freezing citizens three hundred feet to the top of the Capitol’s dome, and lowered it onto the shoulders of the cast-iron effigy of Freedom. Her figure, it was hoped, would gaze forever over the Federal City with its multitudes of battle-worn soldiers, ragged contrabands, government clerks, and harried politicians, and beyond them toward a nation soon to be triumphantly reunited by the armies of the Union. Cannon boomed and onlookers huzzahed as the head settled into place. Beneath the magnificent new dome, however, all was not well. In the marble halls below, a parliamentary coup was afoot that threatened to unravel the coalition that had steered the nation through almost three stormy years of war. Wrote an anxious Rep. Henry Dawes of Massachusetts, “I can think of nothing but a Bull Run so disastrous to our cause as that they might hear in Richmond and abroad that our own House of Representatives was in a state of revolution.” In keeping with the laws of the time, the new Thirty-Eighth Congress that had been elected in 1862 was only now, more than a year later, being seated. Anti-administration House Democrats had made substantial and worrisome gains, gaining twenty-seven seats in the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]