A Bigger Picture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Bigger Picture 30th June 2016 A Bigger Picture Since the real negotiations on Britain's relationship with the EU following the Brexit Vote on the 23rd of June 2016 have not yet taken place, we would like to offer some background into the objectives and methods of the development of the EU Project; without going into to all the detail. Until the Brexit vote there has been little detailed discussion, if any, about the real meaning of the EU integration - it had been held back by the EU until after the Referendum. EU Objectives Had the vote gone to the "Remain" camp in the EU Referendum there is no doubt that the EU would have gone full tilt into integration. In fact, they would have done that following the Treaty of the Constitution for Europe (2004) had that treaty not been rejected by the French and Dutch in 2005. However, the "Terms and Conditions" of this Treaty, and much more, were subsequently distributed within the Lisbon Treaty (2007) for future use viz: What voting "Remain" would mean for Britain, and all the Nation States of Europe. They will: • be forced into the Euro • lose their National identity • be broken down into Regions and Administrative areas controlled directly from Brussels (Berlin) • have to give up their seats at International Organisation, such as the UN, WTO etc. to the EU • be forced to give away their worldwide Foreign Embassy network to the EU • have to give away control of their armed forces • lose control over taxation, pensions, criminal Law (Common Law given protections will be lost in favour of EU Corpus Juris), their civilian police force; all public services, infrastructure and lose all fiscal controls • have to accept the placing of EU prosecutors and paramilitary police, loyal only to Brussels (Berlin), in the EU Regions of the UK. • be required to relinquish control over their Sovereign borders and their ability to accept or deny access, control allocation or distribution of refugees (every migrant will be classified as a refugee). These are only a few of the "delights" of that await any Nation that decides to join or "Remain" in the Political EU; as announced by Juncker and the German Foreign Minister after the Brexit vote. This will be effectively an Occupation; placing under Martial Law the Nation States of Europe by a Foreign Power, as it would have been if this had taken place during WWII; but this time the EU are trying to force the take-over through economic "warfare" - without firing a single shot. How did we end up in this situation? Europe has arrived in this position because of a scheme devised by several individuals, including Jean Monnet (1888 – 1979) variously regarded as one of the founding fathers of the EEC (EU); far more importantly though was one particular organisation, the Fabian Society founded in 1884: a Left wing Political Think Tank which comprised Industrialists and Bankers as well as middle class intellectuals, journalists and writers; notably the Rockefellers, the Belfour’s, George Bernhard Shaw and H G Wells, among many other notables. "The Society’s declared aim was to capture and control all British citizens “for its profit and their own good” (Fabian News, Sept. 1897) For this purpose and in addition to politics, it set out to control education, culture, economy, the legal system and even medicine and religion" (see https://fabiansociety.wordpress.com/ ) It was Fabian Society members who set up the Bilderberg Group, who established the EU in the Treaty of Rome (1957) and also set-up and control the Parliamentary Labour Party; they also setup the UN and the London School of Economics and many other organisations in the UK and overseas. Do not believe that the Fabian Society is an old out-of-date organisation. The members of the society are actively involved in subverting politics in Britain by bringing about a coup against Jeremy Corbyn in order to protect their prize project. The Totalitarian EU Police State. Since 1973 Britain joined the EEC in 1973 under the deception that it was only a trading bloc between Sovereign Nations for a common good. But, all of the elements of the Political EU had already been mapped out in the Treaty of Rome (1957). So, the British people were duped by their politicians; who were sworn to secrecy and required to protect the project from scrutiny by the British population (FCO:30/1048) The EU project has proceeded since that time by stealth, subversion and infiltration within the British Establishment, Political Parties and the House of Lords to name only a few. This was repeated with each new member applying to join "The Club" The modus operandi of the EEC (the "proto-EU" or EU Trojan Horse) was to entangle the Member States in agreements, rules and regulations, protocols and policies. This resulted in complex trading arrangements in which they would all agree to abide by the same rules, which would make them interdependent and lock them into the EEC organisation. Through these means the EEC progressed, ostensibly as a trading area with mutual benefit, until 1992 and then, on the excuse that the EEC needed to change to accommodate new Member States, the Maastricht Treaty (1992) changed the name of the European Economic Community (EEC) or "Common Market" to the European Community (EC). A new legal entity the European Union (EU) was also born; which subsumed the EEC (EC), and this new organisation took control over the EC and assumed control of Defence, Law and Order and Economics for all the Member States. Thus, a new and more extensive level of interdependent entanglement was added. Closer integration followed with further arrangements Schengen Agreement (1995) and treaties Amsterdam (1997) and Nice (2001) Emboldened by their new found power over Europe, the EU attempted to take over the Nation States completely with the Constitution for Europe Treaty (2004) New Labour and Merkel The most notable changes in the relationship between Britain and the EU took place under Blair and New Labour with their opening of the UK to uncontrolled immigration from the EU (2004) and elsewhere, particularly Muslim groups; and under Straw, the introduction of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) (2004); under Brown (from 2007) the UK Benefit System was one that was a particular favourite of immigrants; under Blair the signing the Constitution for Europe (2004), the Amsterdam Treaty (1997) and the Treaty of Nice (2001). Each providing additional powers to the EU over its Member States. Blair also presided over the Devolution of Scotland and Wales on behalf of the EU - a precursor to the breakup of Britain set in train with the EU Regionalisation Programme. Merkel took over the control of the EU after the Constitution for Europe Treaty (2004) was rejected in 2005 and ensured that the text of the rejected Constitution Treaty was distributed within the next major treaty; the Lisbon Treaty (2007). In order to avoid a Referendum, it was called a Reform Treaty, and this was signed by Brown and D. Miliband; who is a New Labour advocate of massive EU expansion into Turkey, North Africa, Ukraine and Russia. David Miliband is a firm supporter of Muslim immigration into Europe. The Lisbon Treaty (2007) is also a self-amending Treaty, effectively an "Enabling Act". The Implementation of the "Final Remedy" - The EU Superstate The "Final Remedy" is a phrase on the plaque in the EU visitor centre in Brussels and relates to the destruction of the Nation States of Europe and the birth of an EU Superstate. The destruction of the Nation States of Europe is being implemented through a number of different routes, but mostly through the "Four Freedoms” - which also have several beneficial business-related benefits, such as, a large nomadic labour pool and lack of restrictions on transportation of goods, for example. The Four Freedoms are designed to remove the sovereign borders of the Nation States of Europe; asset - strip them through privatising their public services and infrastructure and removing their national identities through mass uncontrolled immigration to produce a swamped multicultural mass with little affinity to the new area or country. The EU believes that the ideal group for such as exercise are Muslims who general show more of a local tribal loyalty rather than any loyalty to a particular nationality. These groups largely define their loyalty to the two main Islamic sects; Shia and the Sunni. With regard to this mass immigration into the EU it has been clearly spelled out by the United Nations; most notably by Peter Sutherland (Former UN Special Representative for International Migration, Former EU Commissioner and Former Chairman of Goldman Sachs - now Professor in Practice at the London School of Economics (LSE) that: "The EU should do its best to undermine the homogeneity of its Nation States ... with a view to making them Multicultural ..." (see Brian Wheeler's 2012 BBC report about Peter Sutherland and his meeting with the House of Lords Migration Committee) (Please Note: Peter Sutherland died in January 2018) The UN intervention is simply an extension of a similar programme implemented by stealth during the New Labour years (1997 - 2010) in Britain with the same basic subversion and attempt to destroy national cohesion. Summary The EU is a project established to destroy the Nation States of Europe and bring about the a new Militarised Totalitarian Police Superstate to control every aspect of the lives of the populations of Europe. It is very close in philosophy and methods as the Fabian Society whose many members and supporters form large parts of big and small organisations within the political parties and establishment.
Recommended publications
  • Rencontre Européenne Nb. 8 Peter Sutherland
    41, boulevard des Capucines - 75002 Paris – France Tel. : +33 1 44 58 97 97/98 - Fax : +33 1 44 58 97 99 Site : www.notre-europe.eu - email : [email protected] RENCONTRE EUROPÉENNE NB. 8 PETER SUTHERLAND JUNE 2008 ‘To be truly Irish we have to be European first’ ‘We need the European Union to bind us to other people’ Peter Sutherland The Spire and statue of Jim Larkin on O’Connell Street Interview with Peter Sutherland A fervently pro-European Irishman, Peter Sutherland has held important political mandates in his country, as well as at the European and international level. He was appointed Attorney General of Ireland in the governments of Garret FitzGerald, before becoming European Commissioner for Competition in the first Delors Commission (1985-89). He subsequently became Director General of GATT (now WTO). Peter Sutherland is currently serving as Chairman of BP, of Goldman Sachs International and is the UN Special Representative for Migration. We met him at his house in Dublin, prior to the Irish referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. What made you such a convinced European? From a very early stage, as a university student already, I was a committed European. We could see at first hand in this country the enormous suffering created by extreme nationalism which in turn was a reaction to injustice. Nationalism – often combined with religion, as was the case in Northern Ireland – has often led to conflict throughout history. According to one opinion poll I saw years ago the Irish are the proudest people of all; they have the greatest sense of their own nationality.
    [Show full text]
  • P111,3 Peter Sutherland.Indd
    UNCTAD XII Free trade and the global economy INTERVIEW WITH PETER SUTHERLAND CHAIRMAN, GOLDMAN SACHS INTERNATIONAL AND CHAIRMAN, BP PLC Can global free trade ever benefit both the do not believe provide the same security for global developing and developed worlds equally? trade and which will create difficulties in terms of the Well over a billion people have been lifted out of poverty mixed bag of access arrangements that will follow, globally in the last ten years, out of a total population of particularly for small and medium sized industries. just over five billion. That’s never happened before in Such agreements do not provide the same security or the history of mankind and it has come about, primarily have the same authority as the WTO, which in effect in Asia, as a benefit of globalisation and free trade. As for provides a quasi-judicial mechanism for adjudicating those who have not been beneficiaries of global trade, it is on disputes with global authority. Whereas with most not that global trade agreements are negatively affecting bilateral arrangements, particularly between the them, it is that globalisation is passing them by. Why? developed and the developing countries, the cards are PETER SUTHERLAND Because they neither have the physical nor the human stacked in favour of the developed countries because of is Chairman of BP plc infrastructure, in terms of education and so on, to enable their enhanced power of negotiation, and the absence since 1997 and Chairman them to be part of it. After all globalisation really is, and of a credible adjudication mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the Year Ended 31 July 2015 CONTENTS
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 July 2015 CONTENTS 2 Report of the Chairman of the Court of Governors 3 Report of the Director of the School 4-16 Report of the Directors 17-19 Accounting Policies 20 Consolidated Income and Expenditure Account 21 Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses 22 Balance Sheets 23 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 24-39 Notes to the Accounts 40 Five Year Group Financial Summary 41-44 Corporate Governance and Internal Control Statement 45 Environmental Policy 46 Endowment Investment Performance 47 Report of the Auditors 49 Directors of the School and Members of the Council REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COURT OF GOVERNORS I am delighted to have been appointed Chairman of the LSE. It would be a privilege 2 at any time to be associated with such a prestigious educational establishment, but these are especially exciting times, as the School celebrates the 120th anniversary of its foundation. I am committed to ensuring that during my tenure the School remains focused and ambitious in its commitment to its core mission, delivering world- class teaching, research and public engagement. I am exceedingly grateful to my predecessor, Peter Sutherland, for his dedicated service to the School as Chairman, and trust that he remains a friend to us following his retirement, and despite his extensive and prestigious portfolio of continuing responsibilities. Since taking up my role in February, I have instituted a full-scale review As ever, the School has put on an enviable programme of public lectures of governance, to ensure that everyone within and outside the School and events, and among other illustrious speakers we welcomed this year community understands and respects the workings of the institution.
    [Show full text]
  • What Future for Federalism? About the CER
    Gilles Andréani ★ What future for federalism? about the CER The Centre for European Reform is a think-tank devoted to improving the quality of the debate on the European Union. It is a forum for people with ideas from Britain and across the contintent to discuss the many social, political and economic challenges facing Europe. It seeks to work with similar bodies in other European countries, North America and elsewhere in the world. The CER is pro-European but not uncritical. It regards European integration What future as largely beneficial but recognises that in many respects the Union does not work well. The CER therefore aims to promote new ideas and policies for reforming the European Union. ★ for Director: CHARLES GRANT ADVISORY BOARD PERCY BARNEVIK................................................................................ Chairman, AstraZeneca CARL BILDT................................................................................ Former Swedish Prime Minister federalism? ANTONIO BORGES............................................................................... Former Dean of INSEAD NICK BUTLER (CHAIR)............................... Group Vice President for Policy Development, BP p.l.c. LORD DAHRENDORF ............ Former Warden of St Antony’s College, Oxford & EU Commissioner VERNON ELLIS..................................................................... International Chairman, Accenture JOHN GRAY........................................................................ Professor of European Thought, LSE LORD HANNAY.........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scripting Memory: Hollywood, the Federal Government, And
    SCRIPTING MEMORY: HOLLYWOOD, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND PUBLIC MEMORY IN WWII by Jason Jonathan Rivas, B.A. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a Major in History December 2020 Committee Members: Nancy K. Berlage, Chair Ellen D. Tillman Angela F. Murphy COPYRIGHT by Jason Jonathan Rivas 2020 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Jason Jonathan Rivas, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. DEDICATION To my mother, Blanca, for never giving up on me. Your eagle finally found his wings. To my fiancée, Courtney Stevens, for being the Linda to my Paul McCartney. Ram on. To every high school dropout with a dream. We are more than just a statistic. I’m rooting for you. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first want to thank my mother, Blanca, and my fiancée, Courtney Stevens, for their love and support. Mom, I would not be me if it were not for you showing me that it is okay to be so. Courtney, there are no words to describe the incredible support you provide me and my work throughout the years.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Relations with China and Russia: How to Approach New Superpowers in Trade Matters
    Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology Vol. 4, Issue 1 (2009) EU Relations with China and Russia: How to Approach New Superpowers in Trade Matters Dr Rafael Leal-Arcas∗ Senior Lecturer in Law & Deputy Director of Graduate Studies, Queen Mary, University of London, 67-69 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3JB, United Kingdom; 2008-2009 Tillar House Resident Fellow, American Society of International Law; 2008-2009 Fellow, Georgetown University Law Center (Institute of International Economic Law). Contact: [email protected] Abstract: This paper analyzes the potential of partnerships of the European Union (EU) with China and Russia. The scope of analysis will be the EU vis-à-vis these two countries, using three types of trade liberalization: unilateralism, bilateralism/regionalism, and multilateralism. The paper argues that the EU’s objective of engaging with China and Russia on trade matters is to establish peace, security, and prosperity in the XXI century. Trade creates economic ties and generates more welfare; thus it contributes to peace and security. The paper concludes that, although the EU does want cooperation with both countries, using trade policy as a “carrot” in a policy centered approach does not have much scope beyond current existing efforts. The European Commission’s Directorate- General for external trade is already very active. Few new initiatives seem possible. Moreover, a free-trade agreement between the European Community and Russia/China does not seem to be a suitable trade instrument at the moment. 1. Introduction This paper aims at understanding the potential of partnerships of the European Union (EU) with China and Russia (two major new leading powers (NLP)), focusing on international trade law and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2008 Vol 20 Number 1 Magazine
    Summer 2008 Vol 20 Number 1 Magazine 54 Lincoln’s Inn Fields LSE’s newest building takes shape THE MAGAZINE FOR ALUMNI OF THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE LSE Residences are open to commercial guests during vacations. 10% discount available to alumni, staff and students. With low prices in unbeatable central London locations it’s the ideal place to stay! OF LONDON www.lsevacations.co.uk Individuals, families and groups welcome Singles from £32* Twins from £50* Triples from £64* Good quality, affordable accommodation (*Summer 2008 rates) in unbeatable central locations For further information and booking enquiries contact us on +44 (0)20 7955 7575 or email [email protected] Book online at www.lsevacations.co.uk Accommodation availability Summer 2008 5 July – 27 September Christmas 2008-09 13 December – 10 January Easter 2009 21 March – 26 April Bankside House London SE1 Butler’s Wharf London SE1 Carr-Saunders Hall London W1 Grosvenor House Studios London WC2 High Holborn London WC1 Northumberland House London WC2 Passfield Hall London WC1 Rosebery Hall London EC1 Contents Editor’s message Features If there is a theme to this issue, it’s travel and change. 6 The power game Peter Sutherland, the new chair of LSE Court of Paul Kennedy debates Governors, writes about migration in today’s globalised American power in today’s world and describes the urge to move in pursuit of a fractured world. better life as ‘one of the most natural and powerful’ of 9 Beyond borders all human instincts. The dynamics of migration So it is fitting that we should also look in this issue at the are evolving with remarkable United States, a country whose history is intimately linked speed.
    [Show full text]
  • English Selection of the WTO Director-General
    South Centre Analytical Note January 2005 SC/TADP/AN/IG/8 Original: English Selection of the WTO Director-General: Some Points to Consider Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction............................................................................................................................ 2 II. Identifying and Selecting the Right WTO Director-General ................................................ 4 A. Indicative criteria for assessing the candidates ................................................................ 4 B. Possible sources of information about the candidates ...................................................... 6 III. Following the Right Process................................................................................................6 A. Transparency, Participation, and Consensus Decision-Making....................................... 6 B. Vetoes and Voting ............................................................................................................8 IV. Conclusion......................................................................................................................... 10 Annex I:A – Powers and Functions of the WTO Director-General ........................................ 11 Annex I:B – Rules Governing the Exercise of Powers and Functions of the WTO Director- General ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan 2011-16 LSE in Profile
    Strategic Plan 2011-16 LSE in Profile RESEARCH CENTRES Asia Research Centre for Economic Centre Performance (ESRC) Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion Accounting Centre for Anthropology Philosophy of Centre for Analysis Finance Natural and of Time Series Economics Social Science Centre for Climate Economic History European Institute Change Economics Centre for and Policy (ESRC) ACADEMIC the Study of DEPARTMENTS Gender Human Rights International LSE Health and History Geography and Social Care Environment Financial Markets International Group Relations BSc/BA Government LSE Ideas: Centre for International Language LLB/LLM Grantham Research Affairs, Diplomacy Centre MA/MSc/MPA/MRes International Institute on Climate and Strategy MPhil/PhD Development Law Change and the MBA CORE Media and Environment Suntory and Toyota Management Communications International Centres International for Economics and Mathematics Methodology Growth Centre Related Disciplines Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method Social Psychology Social Policy LSE Cities Spatial Economics Sociology Research Centre (ESRC) Statistics Middle East Centre ESSENTIAL FOUNDATIONS LSE Library Centre for Learning Technology Central Administration IT Services Other Support Services The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) is one of the world’s foremost centres for social science teaching and research. This profile illustrates the breadth of academic expertise in the School’s academic departments and research centres. All academics are involved in teaching and research.
    [Show full text]
  • LSE and the Qaddafi Foundation: a Dissenting Note”, and a Collection of Media Reports on Links Between the LSE and Libya
    THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE COUNCIL 23 June 2009 MINUTES A meeting of the Council was held on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 from 5.15pm to 6.50pm in BOX, 5th Floor, Tower 3 PRESENT: Mr Peter Sutherland (Chairman), Ms Anne Lapping, Mr Howard Davies, Dr Ros Altmann, Mr Stephen Barclay, Professor Chris Brown, Ms Angela Camber, Mr Alan Elias, Mr Aled Dilwyn Fisher, Mr Mario Francescotti, Professor George Gaskell, Mr James Goudie QC, Professor Janet Hartley, Ms Kate Jenkins, Professor Paul Kelly, Dr David Lane, Professor David Marsden, Mr Ashley Mitchell, Dr Eileen Munro, Professor George Philip, Mr Brian Smith, Professor Sarah Worthington BY INVITATION: Mr Richard Goeltz (North American Advisory Board), Mr Mike Bragg (Staff Consultative Council), Mr Roger Mountford (LSEE Nominated Officer), Dr David Held and Mr Victor Dahdaleh (for item 162-167 only) IN ATTENDANCE: Ms Catherine Baldwin, Ms Jenny Bone, Ms Barbara Bush, Mr Andrew Farrell, Mr Adrian Hall, Ms Fiona Kirk, Ms Jayne Rose APOLOGIES: Sir Anthony Battishill, Ms Shami Chakrabarti, Mr Wol Kolade, Professor Robin Mansell, Professor Richard Sennett IN MEMORIAM 157. The Chairman led tributes to Lord Dahrendorf, Director of the LSE (1974-1984), who died on 17 June 2009, aged 80; and to Peter Townsend, Professor of Social Policy and anti-poverty campaigner, who died on 7 June 2009, aged 81. The Council stood for a minute’s silence as a mark of respect. MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 19 MAY 2009 158. RESOLVED: that the minutes of the meeting of Council held on 19 May 2009 be approved as a correct record.
    [Show full text]
  • Migrant Crisis "Part-Deux"
    6th January 2019 Migrant Crisis "Part-Deux" Actually, it is not really a second part because the first part has continued in Italy and Greece ever since, but with less coverage compared to 2015; and more or less under the radar in southern Spain, from Morocco - which has had additional funding to help the migrants - courtesy of the ubiquitous Angela Merkel. The 2015 chaos created, effectively, unilaterally, by Merkel is documented in an earlier article (Merkel’s Folly) written at the time and includes reference to a certain Peter Sutherland, who was Migration chief at the United Nations at the time. Peter Sutherland died in January 2018 - but his legacy lives on today; first; through another Migration Chief, who replaced Sutherland at the UN and espoused the same mantra as Sutherland - William Lacy Swing; a diplomat and former US Ambassador. He was the Director General of the International Organization for Migration at the UN until António Vitorino's appointment in 2018. (Wikipedia) The real Reason behind the Migrant Flows into Europe In 2012, Brian Wheeler wrote an article for the BBC news about a meeting that took place between Peter Sutherland and a UK House of Lords home affairs sub-Committee on Global Migration - Wheeler's report is entitled "EU should 'undermine national homogeneity' says UN migration chief" - By Brian Wheeler, Political reporter, BBC News 21 June 2012 - bbc.com - the report is included below. That is it! That is the reason why Europe is seeing an increase in migrants from anywhere in the third world - to breakdown the identity of the EU Member States and make them "Multicultural" and it is all under the auspices of the United Nations - Do you remember being asked? Note: Mr Sutherland, was a former European Commissioner, Irish Attorney General, non- executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • E114. Portada.Indd
    Alumni Magazine No. 114 / July-September 2009 Navigation Skills: IESE Faculty Reflect on Career Management Ethics Is the Cornerstone of Recovery M. Camdessus • Entrepreneurship: A Competitive Advantage in Any Period J. Roure • Sport Sponsors' Wallets Snap Shut in Downturn J. Mancebo and J. L. Nueno Features 9 Ethics Is the Cornerstone of Recovery M. Camdessus 10 Entrepreneurship: A Competitive Advantage in Any Period J. Roure 14 Sport Sponsors' Wallets Snap Shut in Downturn J. Mancebo and J.L. Nueno 18 Highlights 25 Cover Navigation Skills: IESE Faculty Reflect on Career Management 26 IESE Mourns the Loss of Prof. Eduardo Ballarín 36 MBA Chairman of BP Peter Sutherland speaks at graduation 42 Executive Education IESE Hosts 1st Tourism Summit 50 News Looking to the Future: IESE's International Advisory Board Meets in Barcelona 56 Sponsoring Companies, Research Chairs and Centers: Working Toward Shared Goals 60 Alumni 71 Interview with Helena Revoredo (Advanced Management Program ‘00) 72 MBA Alumni Reunion 76 2009 IESE Global Alumni Reunion 86 You're in the News 88 Chapter News 92 Agenda 96 IESE Alumni Magazine / JULY - SEPTEMBER 2009 3 General Circulation 33,570 Alumni Magazine International Circulation 29,125 (Spanish Edition) No. 114 • July - September 2009 4,445 (English Edition) Index of Companies Editor pag. pag. pag. Antonio Argandoña Airbus Military 60 IBM 69, 88 Saïd Business School 91 Executive Editor Alcatel 36 IMG 55 Saint-Gobain Group 88 Mercedes Castelló Argos 54 Impact Media 51 Santander Group 54, 55, 63, 92 Managing Editor
    [Show full text]