DOCSLIB.ORG

A Systematic Theology of the Christian Bible

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects Scripture in History: A Systematic Theology of the Christian Bible Joseph K. Gordon Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Gordon, Joseph K., "Scripture in History: A Systematic Theology of the Christian Bible" (2016). Dissertations (1934 -). 626. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/626 SCRIPTURE IN HISTORY: A SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY OF THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE by Joseph K. Gordon, B.A., M.Div. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2016 ABSTRACT SCRIPTURE IN HISTORY: A SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY OF THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE Joseph K. Gordon, B.A., M.Div. Marquette University This work utilizes advances in philosophical hermeneutics, the historical study of Christian Scripture, and traditional theological resources to articulate a systematic theology of the Christian Bible. Chapter one introduces the challenges of the contemporary ecclesial and academic situations of Christian Scripture and invokes and explains a functional notion of systematic theology as a resource for meeting those challenges. Chapter two examines the use of the rule of faith by Irenaeus, Origen, and Augustine to locate the emergence of Christian Scripture within the faith of early Christian churches. It shows that structured, intelligible Christian belief and thought are developing and operative in Christian communities and that such faith guided engagement with Christian Scripture. Chapter three summarizes the judgments of the previous chapter, invokes the doctrines of the Nicene Creed as a rule of faith for locating Scripture within the economic work of the Triune God, and supplements the Creed with judgments and hypotheses regarding divine and human freedom and action and the missions of the Son of God and the Holy Spirit in human history. Such resources provide heuristics of the divine contexts of Christian Scripture. Since Christian Scripture bears the influence of its human transmitters and serves distinctive human purposes, chapter four articulates a philosophical and theological anthropology as an account of the human context of Christian Scripture. Chapters five and six explain the nature and purpose of Christian Scripture within the divine and human contexts of the previous two chapters. The former offers a historical overview and theological evaluation of the material history and diversity of Christian Scripture. The latter provides an account of the unity of Christian Scripture. Scripture is one, despite its diversity, because of the unified work of the Holy Spirit in inspiring and illuminating it in Christian community, because of the unity of its reference to the revelatory work of the Triune God centering on Jesus Christ, and finally because of its usefulness for bearing witness to and facilitating the work of the Holy Spirit and the Son of God in history. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Joseph K. Gordon, B.A., M.Div. I am overwhelmed when I recall all of the help and encouragement I have received during my time working on this dissertation. I am sure that I will not remember to mention everyone who has aided me. I must first acknowledge my gratitude to the God who is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit for sustaining me during this work. I have regularly felt the weight of responsibility that comes from writing and teaching about divine things (James 3.1) and have prayed countless times that these words would be at least relatively adequate to the reality of God’s economic work in and through Christian Scripture. I also pray that this work is useful and edifying for those who hope to read and understand the treasures of the written Word of God. Anything valuable in this work I owe to God. Soli Deo gloria. Any mistakes and errors in this work are my own. I am eternally grateful to the communities of St. John’s and Real Life, and for my friends in the Ekklesia Project, for prayer and for spiritual and emotional aid during this process. Countless other friends have supported, encouraged, and challenged me. I owe many thanks to those in the Theology Department at Marquette, and to their significant others, for stimulating conversations and for the joy of their company. There are too many to name, but I must single out Stephen and Katie Waers and Ryan and Kate Hemmer for special mention. Thanks are also due to numerous members of the theology faculty at Marquette who taught me in seminars or took the time to discuss theology, Scripture, and professional matters with me. I owe special thanks to Michel Barnes, Josh Burns, Ralph Del Colle, Deirdre Dempsey, Julian Hills, Mark Johnson, Therese Lysaught, Joseph Mueller, Joseph Ogbonnaya, David Schultenover, and Wanda Zemler-Cizewski. I owe a great deal to former professors and mentors from Johnson University and Lincoln Christian Seminary as well, especially John Castelein, Steve Cone, Steve Cook, Bob Rea, and Chris Simpson. Thanks are also due to Cynthia Crysdale, Steve Fowl, Ben Fulford, Matthew Levering, Peter Martens, and Randy Rosenberg who took time to discuss aspects of this work with me. Special thanks to both Andrei Orlov and Susan Wood for conversations and support and for serving on my dissertation board. I could not have asked for, nor imagined, having better mentors and dissertation co-directors than Robert Doran and Steve Long. Thank you for your encouragement, constructive criticism, and keen and prompt attention to my work. I am thankful and humbled for the financial support I have received from the Theology Department at Marquette during my doctoral studies; I am especially grateful for the dissertation fellowship I received during the 2014–2015 school year, and for nominations for two University-wide fellowships. ii I am extremely grateful to the administration and faculty of Johnson University for entrusting me with the lofty work of forming students for theological reflection and for financial, emotional, and spiritual support during the final year of my dissertation writing. I owe special thanks to Nealy and Jeff Brown, Mike Chambers, Les Hardin, Jon Weatherly, Mark Weedman, and Mark Ziese for their encouraging words and patience with me as I have finished. Thanks are also due to Marla Black in the JUFL library for help with acquiring resources, and to Taylor Wells and Angel Domenech for their work as teaching assistants. I owe special thanks to my parents, David and Marie, for their constant care, words of encouragement, and prayers throughout my education. Thanks are also due to my in-laws, Neal and Miriam Windham, to my siblings, Renee, Ben, Luke, and Sarah, and to those others in my family, especially Grandma Gordon, who have prayed for me and encouraged me during this process. Final thanks are reserved for Charis. I cannot imagine a more thoughtful and patient partner in ministry and life than her. Thank you for walking alongside me with so much grace and encouragement, both in this work and in our life together. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................. i ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................... vii I.) EXIGENCES, SOURCES, AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................... 1 1. Scripture at the Level of Our Times: Situation, Exigence, and Thesis ....................... 1 The Problem(s) and Opportunities of the Situation ............................................ 1 A Need for a Systematic Theology of the Christian Bible ................................ 11 2. The Primary Interlocutors ............................................................................................... 15 Rev. Bernard J. F. Lonergan S. J. .......................................................................... 15 Rev. Henri Cardinal de Lubac S. J. ....................................................................... 20 3. Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 25 What is Systematic Theology? ............................................................................... 29 4. A Systematic Theology of the Christian Bible ............................................................. 39 Excursus: What Does the Bible “Say?” ............................................................... 42 II: HISTORICAL PRECEDENT: THE RULE OF FAITH AS A HERMENEUTICAL GUIDE IN IRENAEUS, ORIGEN, AND AUGUSTINE ...................................................... 48 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 48 2. The “Rule of Faith” in the Early Christian Centuries ................................................. 61 Irenaeus of Lyons and the Rule of Faith ............................................................. 70 Origen of Alexandria and the Rule of Faith ....................................................... 80 Augustine of Hippo and the Rule of Faith ......................................................... 88 3. Summary and Conclusion ..............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Biblical Theology: Past, Present, and Future Biblical Theology: Past, Present, Future and Vol

    Biblical Theology: Past, Present, and Future Biblical Theology: Past, Present, Future and Vol

    Journal of Theology Southwestern Present, and Future Present, Biblical Theology: Past, Biblical Theology: SWJT Biblical Theology: Past, Present, and Future Vol. 55 No. 2 • Spring 2013 EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Paige Patterson, President, Professor of Theology, and L.R. Scarborough Chair of Evangelism (“Chair of Fire”) MANAGING EDITOR Terry L. Wilder, Professor and Wesley Harrison Chair of New Testament EDITORIAL BOARD Jason G. Duesing, Vice President for Strategic Initiatives and Assistant Professor of Historical Theology Keith E. Eitel, Professor of Missions, Dean of the Roy Fish School of Evangelism and Missions, and Director of the World Missions Center Mark A. Howell, Senior Pastor, First Baptist Church Daytona Beach Evan Lenow, Assistant Professor of Ethics and Director of the Riley Center Miles S. Mullin II, Assistant Professor of Church History, J. Dalton Havard School for Theological Studies Steven W. Smith, Professor of Communication, Dean of the College at Southwestern Jerry Vines, Jerry Vines Ministries Joshua E. Williams, Assistant Professor of Old Testament BOOK REVIEW EDITOR AND EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Ched Spellman Southwestern Journal of Theology invites English-language submissions of original research in Biblical studies, historical theology, systematic theology, ethics, philosophy of religion, homiletics, pastoral ministry, evangelism, missiology, and related fields. Articles submitted for consideration should be neither published nor under review for publication elsewhere. The recommended length of articles is between 4000 and 8000 words. For information on editorial and stylistic requirements, please contact the journal’s Editorial Assistant at journal@ swbts.edu. Articles should be sent to the Managing Editor, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, P.O. Box 22608, Fort Worth, Texas 76122.
  • REVIEW Peter Ochs Another Reformation: Postliberal Christianity and the Jews (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011), 288 Pp

    REVIEW Peter Ochs Another Reformation: Postliberal Christianity and the Jews (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011), 288 Pp

    Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations REVIEW Peter Ochs Another Reformation: Postliberal Christianity and the Jews (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011), 288 pp. Christina Smerick, Greenville College Peter Ochs, a Jewish theologian long involved in Jewish- Christian relations, uses a pragmatic philosophical framework, based on Charles Peirce, and his own critique of the dyadic structure of modernist thought, to examine postliberal Chris- tian theologians, both in the US and Great Britain, with regard to “non-supersessionism.” Supersessionism is the doctrinal teaching arguing that Christianity is a new covenant between God and humanity, which replaces the covenant found in Torah between God and the Jewish people. Postliberal thought, Ochs argues, in its rejection of dyadic thinking, also rejects supersessionism as unnecessarily binary and undeserv- ing of a full picture of the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus. He focuses on the theologians George Lindbeck, Rob- ert Jenson, Stanley Hauerwas, John Howard Yoder, Daniel Hardy, and David Ford. Ochs’ main point is that postliberal theologians hold that the Church need not turn from the Gospels or from the history of church doctrine in order to reject supersessionism. Ochs at- tributes this sea change in understanding Christian doctrine to a new, third epoch in the history of Judeo-Christian relations. This epoch, that of “postliberalism,” is one of “relationality that invites both critical reason and a reaffirmation of scriptur- al revelation” (p. 4). He approaches a fuller articulation of this epoch logically, albeit via a “theo-logic” that refuses exclusion and binary oppositions in favor of a pattern of thought that seeks to be reparative and thus guided by a “relational (and thus non-dyadic) logic of inquiry” (p.
  • WIKIREADER Eine Artikelsammlung Aus Wikipedia, Der Freien

    WIKIREADER Eine Artikelsammlung Aus Wikipedia, Der Freien

    WIKIREADER Eine Artikelsammlung aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie Schreibwettbewerb 3/2005 IMPRESSUM Autoren: Die Mitarbeiter der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia Adresse der Wikipedia: http://de.wikipedia.org Adresse dieses Hefts: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiReader/Schreibwettbewerb_03/2005 Herausgeber: Achim Raschka Korrektoren: - Version: Momentaufnahme vom 01.04.2005 ÜBER WIKIPEDIA Wikipedia ist ein internationales Projekt zum Aufbau von Enzyklopädien in allen Sprachen der Welt. Bei dem offenen Projekt kann jeder Benutzer über das Internet nicht nur Artikel lesen, sondern auch ohne Anmeldung schreiben und bearbeiten. Wikipedia-Artikel sind kostenlos abrufbar und dürfen unter den Bedingungen der GNU-Lizenz für Freie Dokumentation auch bearbeitet und weiterverbreitet werden. Diese aus der Open-Source- Software-Bewegung heraus entstandene Lizenz stellt sicher, dass jeder Artikel in beliebiger Weise verwendet werden darf, auch kommerziell, solange dieses Recht auch weiterhin eingeräumt wird. Besonders die uneinschränkbare Weiterverwendbarkeit reizt viele Teilnehmer, selbst Artikel beizusteuern. Ein Abbruch des Projekts ist nahezu ausgeschlossen, da sowohl die verwendete Software als auch die Artikel frei verfügbar sind. ÜBER DIE HEFTREIHE “WIKIREADER” Der WikiReader ist eine unregelmäßig erscheinende Heftreihe, welche ausgewählte Wikipedia-Artikel thematisch bündelt und in einer redaktionell aufbereiteten Form präsentiert. Die Auswahl der Artikel erhebt keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit, sondern soll gewissermaßen als "Schnappschuss" des jeweiligen Themas dienen. Wir ermuntern unsere Leser ausdrücklich dazu, selbst weiter zu recherchieren, Artikel in der Wikipedia zu verbessern oder auch neue Artikel hinzuzufügen und damit Anregungen zu liefern für zukünftige WikiReader-Ausgaben. Neben dem hier vorliegenden WikiReader zum Thema Wale wurden bereits Reader zu den Themen Internet und Schweden gedruckt, weitere sind in Arbeit. Verfügbar sind die bereits gedruckten Reader auf der Internetseite http://www.wikireader.de.
  • SAINT NICHOLAS GREEK ORTHODOX SHRINE CHURCH FLUSHING, NEW YORK May 9, 2021 Sunday of Saint Thomas / St

    SAINT NICHOLAS GREEK ORTHODOX SHRINE CHURCH FLUSHING, NEW YORK May 9, 2021 Sunday of Saint Thomas / St

    SAINT NICHOLAS GREEK ORTHODOX SHRINE CHURCH FLUSHING, NEW YORK May 9, 2021 Sunday of Saint Thomas / St. Christopher The Great –Martyr Protopresbyter Fr. Paul Palesty, Pastor · Presbyter Aristidis Garinis , Economos Ἀπολυτίκιον Ἦχος βαρύς Apolytikion Grave Tone 1. Ἐσφραγισμένου τοῦ μνήματος, ἡ Ζωὴ ἐκ τάφου O Life, You rose from the sepulcher, even though ἀνέτειλας Χριστὲ ὁ Θεός, καὶ τῶν θυρῶν the tomb was secured with a seal, O Christ God. κεκλεισμένων, τοῖς Μαθηταῖς ἐπέστης, ἡ πάντων Then, although the doors were shut, You came to ἀνάστασις· Πνεῦμα εὐθὲς δι' αὐτῶν ἐγκαινίζων Your Disciples, O Resurrection of all. Through them ἡμῖν, κατὰ τὸ μέγα σου ἔλεος. You renew a right spirit in us, according to Your great mercy. Tοῦ Ναου Ἦχος δʹ. Tone 4. Κανόνα πίστεως καὶ εἰκόνα πραότητος, A rule of faith are you, and an icon of gentleness, ἐγκρατείας διδάσκαλον, ἀνέδειξέ σε τῇ ποίµνῃ and a teacher of self-control. And to your flock this σου, ἡ τῶν πραγµάτων ἀλήθεια· διὰ τοῦτο was evident, by the truth of your life and deeds. ἐκτήσω τῇ ταπεινώσει τὰ ὑψηλά, τῇ πτωχείᾳ τὰ You were humble and therefore you acquired exalt- πλούσια, Πάτερ ἱεράρχα Νικόλαε· πρέσβευε ed gifts, treasure in heaven for being poor. O Father Χριστῷ τῷ Θεῷ, σωθῆναι τὰςψυχὰς ἡµῶν. and Hierarch St. Nicholas, intercede with Christ our God, and entreat Him to save our souls. Kontakion Tone pl. 4 Κοντάκιον. Ἦχος πλ. δʹ Though You went down into the tomb, O Immortal Εἰ καὶ ἐν τάφῳ κατῆλθες Ἀθάνατε, ἀλλὰ τοῦ One, yet You brought down the dominion of Hades; ᾅδου καθεῖλες τὴν δύναμιν· καὶ ἀνέστης ὡς and You rose as the victor, O Christ our God; and νικητής, Χριστὲ ὁ Θεός, γυναιξὶ Μυροφόροις You called out "Rejoice" to the Myrrh-bearing wom- φθεγξάμενος, Χαίρετε, καὶ τοῖς σοῖς Ἀποστόλοις en, and gave peace to Your Apostles, O Lord who to εἰρήνην δωρούμενος, ὁ τοῖς πεσοῦσι παρέχων the fallen grant resurrection.
  • BEFORE the ORIGINAL POSITION the Neo-Orthodox Theology of the Young John Rawls

    BEFORE the ORIGINAL POSITION the Neo-Orthodox Theology of the Young John Rawls

    BEFORE THE ORIGINAL POSITION The Neo-Orthodox Theology of the Young John Rawls Eric Gregory ABSTRACT This paper examines a remarkable document that has escaped critical at- tention within the vast literature on John Rawls, religion, and liberalism: Rawls’s undergraduate thesis, “A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: An Interpretation Based on the Concept of Community” (1942). The thesis shows the extent to which a once regnant version of Protestant the- ology has retreated into seminaries and divinity schools where it now also meets resistance. Ironically, the young Rawls rejected social contract liber- alism for reasons that anticipate many of the claims later made against him by secular and religious critics. The thesis and Rawls’s late unpublished remarks on religion and World War II offer a new dimension to his intellec- tual biography. They show the significance of his humanist response to the moral impossibility of political theology. Moreover, they also reveal a kind of Rawlsian piety marginalized by contemporary debates over religion and liberalism. KEY WORDS: John Rawls, community, liberalism, religion, political theology, public reason PROTESTANT THEOLOGIAN REINHOLD NIEBUHR DIED IN 1971. In that same year, philosopher John Rawls published his groundbreaking work, A The- ory of Justice. These two events symbolically express transformations in American intellectual and political culture that remain significant today. In the academy, religious defenders of a liberal consensus had been chal- lenged by ascendant secular liberalisms and emergent religious voices critical of liberalism of any kind. Parallel developments in the political culture had begun to see the fracturing of coalitions that transcended di- verse religious and secular commitments in order to support democratic institutions and practices.
  • Rachel Carson and Nature As Resource, Object and Spirit

    Rachel Carson and Nature As Resource, Object and Spirit

    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 8-2010 Rachel Carson and nature as resource, object and spirit : identification, consubstantiality, and multiple stakeholders in the environmental rhetoric of the conservation in action series. Cynthia E. Britt University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Britt, Cynthia E., "Rachel Carson and nature as resource, object and spirit : identification, consubstantiality, and multiple stakeholders in the environmental rhetoric of the conservation in action series." (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 154. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/154 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RACHEL CARSON AND NATURE AS RESOURCE, OBJECT, AND SPIRIT: IDENTIFICATION, CONSUBSTANTIALITY, AND MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL RHETORIC OF THE CONSERVATION IN ACTION SERIES By Cynthia E. Britt B.A., Western Kentucky University, 2000 M.A., Western Kentucky University, 2003 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky August 2010 ----------------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RACHEL CARSON AND NATURE AS RESOURCE, OBJECT, AND SPIRIT: IDENTIFICATION, CONSUBSTANTIALITY, AND MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL RHETORIC OF THE CONSERVATION IN ACTION SERIES By Cynthia E.
  • This Week Announcements Prayers Thank

    This Week Announcements Prayers Thank

    . Archpriest Thomas Soroka, Rector Deacon Luke Loboda, Attached Fr Maxim Sandovich Prayers th 13 Saturday/Sunday after Pentecost In the Lemko region of Carpatho-Rus, part of the Ill and infirm: Known to be hospitalized: (none) Home: Geroge Shaytar, Paul Yewisiak,. Austro-Hungarian Empire, Fr Maxim was imprisoned McKees Rocks/Pittsburgh, PA Shut in, Rehabilitation, or Nursing Home: from 1912 to 1914 and found not guilty. With the OrthodoxPittsburgh.org September 5/6, 2020 Garnette Kerchum, Eleanor Kovacs, Olga outbreak of World War I, Father Maxim was again Tryszyn. arrested and imprisoned on August 4, 1914 along with his entire family. Father Maxim, his father, mother, Welcome! Announcements brother, and wife were forced to travel on foot to the Vigil Lights from Charles A. Wasilko for the prison while being prodded by the bayonets of the Whether you are searching for a new church home This weekend we're honored to have with us departed servant of God, Mat. Janet Mihalick; soldiers. In prison they were placed in separate cells or just visiting, we are glad you’re with us today. If Sister Larysa, a lay-sister with the Convent of St for the health of sisters Doris and Marsha. From and denied the opportunity to see each other. This you have a prayer request, are looking for more Elisabeth in Minsk, Belarus. This convent does John Kowalcheck and Olga Cozza for the health time, however, there would be no court trial. On the information about the Orthodox Faith, would like incredible work in many areas, including caring of Vladimir Mayorov.
  • Church History

    Church History

    Village Missions Website: http://www.vmcdi.com Contenders Discipleship Initiative E-mail: [email protected] Church History Ecclesiology Church History History of Christian Doctrine Church History - Ecclesiology and the History of Christian Doctrine Contenders Discipleship Initiative – Church History Student’s Guide TRAINING MODULE SUMMARY Course Name Church History Course Number in Series 5 Creation Date August 2017 Created By: Russell Richardson Last Date Modified January 2018 Version Number 2.0 Copyright Note Contenders Bible School is a two-year ministry equipping program started in 1995 by Pastor Ron Sallee at Machias Community Church, Snohomish, WA. More information regarding the full Contenders program and copies of this guide and corresponding videos can be found at http://www.vmcontenders.org or http://www.vmcdi.com Copyright is retained by Village Missions with all rights reserved to protect the integrity of this material and the Village Missions Contenders Discipleship Initiative. Contenders Discipleship Initiative Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the Contenders Discipleship Initiative courses are those of the instructors and authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Village Missions. The viewpoints of Village Missions may be found at https://villagemissions.org/doctrinal-statement/ The Contenders program is provided free of charge and it is expected that those who receive freely will in turn give freely. Permission for non-commercial use is hereby granted but re-sale is prohibited. Copyright
  • Endowment Report

    Endowment Report

    2019-2020 ENDOWMENT REPORT 1 InIn August August, 2019, 2019, 23 23 Global Global StudentStudent Impact Impact Fellows Fellows arrivedarrived in in Sierra Sierra Leone, Leone, Africa,Africa, to to conduct conduct field field work workon projects on projects designed designed to fight tohunger fight andhunger disease and diseaseand andincrease increase global global awareness awarenessof health crises. of health While crises. their Whileresearch their and research projects and varied, projectsthe Lehigh varied, students the Lehigh had a studentsshared goal—sustainable had a shared goal —impact. sustainable impact. 2 Dear Alumni and Friends, Dear Alumni and Friends, An institution cannot rise The Endowment earned +0.7 percent for fiscal year 2020, net of all to great heights without fees. This year has been a challenging environment for investing with a strong foundation. For global equity markets sharply declining 34 percent over 24 trading Lehigh, a critical part of days only to be followed by a precipitous rally with equity markets that foundation is the surging 38 percent through fiscal year-end. With the increased Tower Society. level of market uncertainty, it was constructive to see the overall portfolio weathering the market volatility and end the fiscal year in The Tower Society was positive territory. founded 30 years ago to recognize all who Positive performance was generated across the absolute return, have supported Lehigh, private equity and treasury/cash portfolios although offset by negative including its endowment, performance from our public equity portfolio. The portfolio benefited with a current or deferred from both opportunistic and diversifying strategies, which were able planned gift.
  • Introduction Old Testament

    Introduction Old Testament

    ———————————————— THINK AGAIN AN INTRODUCTION L STUDY NOTES STUDY NOTES L TO THE OLD TESTAMENT HISTORICAL BOOKS ———————————————— ———————————————— DAVID M. HOWARD JR. PERSONA 1 LIVING WORD AMI HISTORICAL BOOKS ———————————————— ———————————————— THINK AGAIN CONTENTS Preface L STUDY NOTES STUDY NOTES L 1. Introduction to Historical Narrative Historical Narrative as Prose: Contrast with Poetry Definitions Form Content Conclusion Historical Narrative as History Definitions History as “The Facts” History as the Record of the Facts Modern Historical Study of Biblical History Rationales for Historical Study PERSONA The Importance of Historicity Modern Historians of Biblical History and the Problem of Evidence 2 LIVING WORD AMI HISTORICAL BOOKS ———————————————— ———————————————— Modern Historians of Biblical History and the Problem of the Historian THINK AGAIN Historie and Geschichte Historical Method: The Study of the Facts Historical Narrative as Literature L STUDY NOTES STUDY NOTES L Historical Narrative as Story Characteristics of Historical Narrative Elements of Historical Narrative The Stylistics of Historical Narrative Conclusion: Reading Historical Narrative 2. Joshua Joshua: Title and Man Authorship and Date of Composition Purpose Historical and Cultural Context for the Book of Joshua Date of the Events PERSONA Nature of the Events Historical Setting of the Conquest The Place of Joshua in the Canon 3 LIVING WORD AMI HISTORICAL BOOKS ———————————————— ———————————————— Joshua and the Pentateuch Joshua and the “Deuteronomistic History” THINK AGAIN Joshua and the Present Canon Special Issues in the Book of Joshua The Destruction of the Canaanites STUDY NOTES L Rahab’s Lie Etiology in Joshua Jericho and the Archaeological Record Ai and the Archaeological Record Joshua’s Long Day Theology of the Book of Joshua The Land Rest The Covenant Purity of Worship (Holiness) Outline of the Book of Joshua PERSONA 3.
  • St Basil's Contribution to the Trinitarian Doctrine: A

    St Basil's Contribution to the Trinitarian Doctrine: A

    ST BASIL’S CONTRIBUTION TO THE TRINITARIAN DOCTRINE: A SYNTHESIS OF GREEK PAIDEIA AND THE SCRIPTURAL WORLDVIEW Philip Kariatlis Abstract: St Basil’s contribution to the formulation of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity has long been acknowledged in the Christian tradition. Indeed, he was responsible for articulating the ‘orthodox’ vision of God with theological and philosophical originality that truly laid the foundations upon which the way of pondering the Trinitarian mystery in the East was established. His achievement lay in his remarkable ability to ennoble the culture of the day with the Christian message without in any way compromising the latter. This paper explores the Trinitarian theology of St Basil with a view towards highlighting the harmonious synthesis of Greek paideia and the scriptural worldview. ndeniably, the Church’s teaching on the mystery of the Holy Trinity stands at the very heart of Christian belief. Indeed, Uit has rightly been recognised as Christianity’s differentia specifica, namely that specific teaching which clearly distinguishes the 1 Christian faith from all other forms of monotheism. Notwithstanding the importance of this teaching and the fact that it is firmly rooted in the Scriptures, it nevertheless took the early Church many years to acquire a clearly articulated theology of the Trinitarian mystery. The need for precise terminology particularly emerged when the Church had to define with accuracy in what way the one God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – namely, the Father almighty – was related to Jesus Christ – who was professed to be God’s only begotten Son, his eternal Word and Image – PHRONEMA, VOL.
  • Sarah Coakley and the Future of Systematic Theology

    Sarah Coakley and the Future of Systematic Theology

    Being George Eliot: An Impossible Standpoint? Janice McRandal “Coakley is the George Eliot of Theologians.”1 This claim, made by Mark Oppenheimer, has sat uncomfortably in my memory for many years now, punctuated by a perpetual question mark. Oppenheimer was most likely referring to the way prose operated in Coakley’s work, but the ambiguity, or rather the irony, of this analogy has stuck. Eliot, of course, chose to conceal her gender. It was a means to an end, a way to penetrate the literary community of the Victorian era; a choice she felt would allow her work to be taken seriously and shield her from the puritanical gaze. It was a successful strategy for Mary Ann Evans: George Eliot’s legacy is secure alongside the great writers of Western literature. But this is hardly an uncomplicated ascription, perhaps demonstrated by the lasting confusion surrounding Virginia Woolf’s famous declaring of Eliot’s Middlemarch to be “one of the few English novels written for grown- up people.”2 In Coakley’s case, writing systematic theology as a woman 1. Mark Oppenheimer, “Prayerful Vulnerability,” Christian Century 120, no. 13 (2003): 26. 2. Virginia Woolf, “George Eliot,” The Times Literary Supplement, 20 November 1919. Regarding the vii COAKLEY AND THE FUTURE OF SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY has become an identity marker, a way in which her work is praised and critiqued. She has been celebrated for her “erudite, challenging and eirenic theological voice,”3 her work being described as a “connoisseur’s piece,”4 while simultaneously being critiqued for her academic Fachsprache,5 an ongoing issue of concern for feminists debating the use of exclusive language in the field.6 Much of this evaluation seems to depend on assumptions regarding what constitutes a serious systematician, or a solemn feminist.