DOCSLIB.ORG

Azalea Commons Retail Development 4900 Brook Road Richmond, Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Azalea Commons Retail Development 4900 Brook Road Richmond, Virginia AZALEA COMMONS RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 4900 BROOK ROAD RICHMOND, VIRGINIA DAVID WASHINGTON Practicum for MS in Real Estate Carey Business School Johns Hopkins University April 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .........................................................I • Summary of Project Development • Summary of Finance and Investment Requirements • SWOT Analysis Location and Geography ...................................................II • Map of Site • Directions to Site Economic Analysis ............................................................III • National Economy • Richmond Metro Economy Retail Market Analysis.......................................................IV • Inventory and Construction • Richmond Northeast Retail Sub-market • Market Competition Site Analysis .......................................................................V • Westminster Canterbury • Adjacent Residential Neighborhoods Demographic Analysis ......................................................VI • Regional Snapshot • Demographic Analysis of Richmond and Henrico Co. Retail Trends and Potential Market Capture. ...................VII • Trade Area Map • Trade Area Demographics • Psychographics • Retail Trends & Potential Market Capture • Consumer Expenditure Analysis • Trade area Sales Volume Finance and Investment Analysis.....................................VIII • Project Development Budget • Project’s Operating Performance • Financial Analysis • Ownership Structure Zoning and Land Use Regulations....................................IX TABLE OF CONTENTS • Current Zoning • Zoning of Surrounding Properties • County Comprehensive Plan • Required Development Standards Site Design and Architecture.............................................X • Design Strategy and Concept • Site Design Features and Amenities Construction Management Controls .................................XI • Project Delivery Method • Risk Management • Development Team and Responsibilities • Project Schedule Market Strategy and Execution .........................................XII • Leasing Management • Prospective Tenants Appendix/Exhibits Page 3 of 63 ______________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proposed Project Azalea Commons Location 4900 Brook Road, Richmond Virginia 23227 Projected Development Cost $11.1M Land (sunk cost, excluded from total costs) $1.6M Sitework and Improvements $27.4M Construction/Hard Costs $6.3M Design, Legal, Permits and other Soft Costs $35.30M Total Project Costs Planned Construction Schedule Design & Public Approvals: July 2008 to May 2009 Sitework, Utilities, and Landscaping: Mar ‘09 to Sept ‘09 Building Construction June 2009 to October 2010 Financing Requirements $27.3M Construction Loan $7.58M Equity $500K Enterprise Zone Grant from County $29.012M Permanent Debt/Mortgage Investment Analysis NPV is $7,430,340 at a 12 percent hurdle rate IRR 19.35 percent DCF/Holding Period 12 years Trade Area Demographics Total Population for Five Mile Radius: 214,639 Total Households for Five Mile Radius: 97,067 Average HH Income Five Mile Radius: $54,442 Daytime Work Population: 125,229 Traffic Count: 146,525 Zoning B-2 Business District/Commercial, Urban Mixed Use. Proposed development conforms with zoning regulations and County Master Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION This proposal is for the redevelopment of 4900 Brook Road, Richmond Virginia 23227 (Henrico County). The site contains 30 acres and was previously a regional shopping mall but became functionally obsolete and unable to compete with newer malls as the region’s demographics changed and was therefore demolished in the early 1990s. Site has been fallow since then and should be redeveloped as mixed use with retail and other uses to serve this underserved neighborhood that _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Azalea Commons Page 4 of 63 ______________________________________________________________________________ straddles the City or Richmond and County of Henrico. This proposal is for the retail component only. Future development should be phased as the market dictates space needs. PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN Land Use & Building Information Site Area 1,306,800 Sq.ft. 30.00 /Acres Land Use Plan Lot Coverage Acres Square Ft. Retail Gross Buildable Area 15.73% 4.72 205,555.00 Parking 6.12% 1.84 800 Spaces 80,000.00 Open Space/Landscaping 8.33% 2.50 108,900.00 Reserved for Future Mixed use Development 69.82% 20.94 912,345.00 GRAND TOTAL 100.00% 30.00 1,306,800.00 Planned Uses: Retail Development Gross Sq. Ft. Leasable Sq. Ft. Retail 170,355 153,000 Health Club/Gym 11,000 10,000 Restaurants 24,200 22,000 TOTALS 205,555 185,000 SWOT ANALYSIS STRENGTHS • Location: Site has single family residential neighborhoods in proximity that would serve as a customer base. In addition, there is a senior living community that is to the west with 870 residents. • Retail Sales Volume: Retail sales volume for the trade area (5 mile radius) is $4.8 billion. WEAKNESSES • Concentration/Sector Risk: The financial performance of the firm is subject to the risk that should the Project not generate revenues sufficient to meet operating expenses--debt service, and capital expenditures. Specific examples that could affect the owner include but are not limited to the following: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Azalea Commons Page 5 of 63 ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Local real estate market conditions, such as oversupply or reduction in demand for office industrial, retail or residential; and 2. Downturns in the national, regional and local economic climate; 3. Competition from other warehouse/flex properties; 4. Local real estate market conditions, such as oversupply or reduction in demand for retail properties; and 5. Vacancies, changes in market rental rates, and the need to perform capital improvements. OPPORTUNITIES Real Estate development cannot create demand or generate new business—it must attract customers from existing business within or beyond the trade area that are not meeting market expectations; fulfill a demand that has not been met within the market area; or capture the increase in purchasing power that results from employment, or income growth. The market/trade area analysis indicates that retail sales are leaking to other areas of the county and that the site would serve City residents that live in proximity to the proposed development. THREATS • Adverse effects from the tenant's financial insolvency: The bankruptcy or insolvency of the tenant may adversely affect the income produced by the property should the tenant file bankruptcy protection, the company could suffer a shortfall and thus could adversely affect cash flow. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Azalea Commons Page 6 of 63 ______________________________________________________________________________ SITE LOCATION The City of Richmond is located in the eastern-central part of the state of Virginia on the James River-Latitude 37 degrees 54’ N and Longitude 77 degrees 46’W. The City is 100 miles from the nation’s capital. From its Central East Coast location, Richmond is within 750 miles of 151,696,000 people and 301,000 manufacturing firms. Nearly 60 percent of the nation’s total personal income and consumer expenditures are within 750 miles of Central Virginia. (Source: The Logistics & Supply Chain Forum). LOCATION Site is located between I-95 between Westbrook Avenue (Exit 80) and U. S. Route 1 (Exit 81), Richmond, Virginia Proposed Site The site is surrounded by some of the city’s most densely populated areas. The site is uniquely positioned to service the vastly underserved and established neighborhoods of Northern Richmond including Ginter Park, Sherwood Park, and Bellevue. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Azalea Commons Page 7 of 63 ______________________________________________________________________________ DIRECTIONS TO SITE: • From Northern Virginia (From 95/395/495): Take 95 south to Richmond. Take the Chamberlyne Avenue (US 301) Exit 82. Stay straight to go onto Chamberlayne (US 301) South; Turn right (west) onto Azalea Avenue; Turn left onto Brook Road. • From Richmond International Airport: Turn slight right onto South Airport Drive; Merge onto I-64 West toward Richmond.; Merge onto I-95 North; Take exit 81 toward US-1; Turn slight right onto Wilmer Avenue; Turn left onto Brook Road US-1; Continue to follow Brook Road for ~0.3 miles; end at 4900 Brook Road. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Azalea Commons Page 8 of 63 ______________________________________________________________________________ MACRO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS NATIONAL ECONOMY ECONOMIC INDICATORS The U.S. economy is slowing but not in a recession. The 2006 2007 2008F Coincident Economic Index GDP Growth-National 2.80% 2.20% 1.50% of the Conference Board CPI Growth-National 3.20% 2.80% 2.50% Leading Economic Indicators, Unemployment-Regional 3.20% 3.10% 3.20% the best measure of where we Employment Growth Regional 1.70% 1.40% 1.00% are, rose by 0.1 percent in December 2007 and thus the economy was not in recession at year
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PPEA Proposal the Southeastern Virginia Training Center Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services
    Copy Commonwealth of Virginia PPEA Proposal The Southeastern Virginia Training Center Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services Submitted By: W. M. Jordan Company April 24, 2009 11010 Jefferson Avenue, Newport News, VA 23601-0337 757.596.6341 708 Bainbridge Street, Richmond, VA 23224-0366, Troutman Sanders Building 804.233.6921 1001 Haxall Point www.wmjordan.com P.O. Box 1122 129 West Virginia Beach Blvd. Richmond, Virginia 23218-1122 Norfolk, Virginia 23510-2030 Phone: 804.697.1474 Phone: 757.622.2828 www.troutmansanders.com www.rrmm.com Southeastern Virginia Training Center Chesapeake, VA Phase I PPEA Proposal Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................. Pages 1-2 Section 1- Qualifications and Experience .......................................................... Pages 3-49 1 a. Organization ......................................................................................................................Page 3 Owner ..................................................................................................................................Page 3 Contractor .......................................................................................................................... Page 3 Principal Designer ........................................................................................................... Page 3 Design Consultant ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Property Group, Inc
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 001-14469 04-6268599 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission File No.) (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 225 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code) (317) 636-1600 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: Name of each exchange Title of each class on which registered Common stock, $0.0001 par value New York Stock Exchange 6% Series I Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value New York Stock Exchange 83⁄8% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes ፤ No អ Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes អ No ፤ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Report Boulevard Diamond Stadium Highest & Best Use Analysis
    Final Project Report Boulevard Diamond Stadium Highest & Best Use Analysis Prepared for The City of Richmond Richmond, VA Submitted by Economics Research Associates Davenport & Company LLC Chmura Economics & Analytics September 2008 ERA Project No. 17889 1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 750 Washington, DC 20036 202.496.9870 FAX 202.496.9877 www.econres.com Los Angeles San Francisco San Diego Chicago Washington DC London New York Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary......................................................................................................................... 5 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................... 6 Discussion of Key Items & Assumptions...........................................................................................9 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 10 II. Methodology and Approach ...................................................................................... 13 Boulevard and Shockoe Bottom Site Considerations ...................................................................... 13 Land Planning Assumptions.......................................................................................................... 17 Market Demand Assumptions.......................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Inform Awards Interior Design & Landscape Architects Directories
    Architecture+Design in the Mid-Atlantic 2013: number three six dollars 22nd Annual Inform Awards Interior Design & Landscape Architects Directories Inform Awards · Design for Aging · Net Zero Design · Working Smarter Our service. Your solution. Our personalized service begins before the order is placed and lasts for the lifetime of your project. Long after you’ve completed a new design, you’ll continue to appreciate our 20-year warranty and dedicated service. Why Simonton? • Special order shapes and confi gurations • Custom-made windows and doors • Complete delivery within four days in most areas • Personal service • Award-winning quality — Builder Magazine Elizabeth Seton Prestwick Chase Pediatric Center Senior Living Facility Kendal on Hudson Retirement Community Specify Simonton for your next project and discover why architects, builders and consumers alike prefer Simonton. “Highest in Customer Satisfaction with Windows and Doors, Three Years in a Row” [email protected] | simonton.com/archdetails Simonton Windows received the highest numerical score among window and door manufacturers in the proprietary J.D. Power and Associates 2010-2012 Windows and Patio Doors Satisfaction Studies.SM 2012 study based on responses from 2,519 consumers measuring 11 brands and measures opinions of consumers who purchased new windows or patio doors in the previous 12 months. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of consumers surveyed in January – February, 2012. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com 13-SIMU-7642-Northern VA-DC Arch Ad-vf.indd 1 4/4/13 10:36 AM Crenshaw_Inform_Ad_2013.pdf 1 4/9/2013 5:07:29 PM C M Y CM 1 MY CY CMY K Paul Barret, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs for New Ashley Stewart, Inc
    Case 14-14383-MBK Doc 170 Filed 03/31/14 Entered 03/31/14 19:45:24 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 213 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In re: Chapter 11 ASHLEY STEWART HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,1 Case No. 14-14383 Debtors. (Jointly Administered) SCHEDULES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL AFFAIRS FOR NEW ASHLEY STEWART, INC. CASE NO. 14-14384 1 The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: Ashley Stewart Holdings, Inc. (6790); New Ashley Stewart, Inc. (6655); AS IP Holdings, Inc. (6890); and NAS Gift LLC (5413). The Debtors’ corporate offices are located at 100 Metro Way, Secaucus, NJ 07094. Case 14-14383-MBK Doc 170 Filed 03/31/14 Entered 03/31/14 19:45:24 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 213 GLOBAL NOTES AND STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS, METHODOLOGY, AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING DEBTOR'S SCHEDULES AND STATEMENTS Introduction On March 10, 2014 (the “Petition Date”), Ashley Stewart Holdings, Inc., New Ashley Stewart, Inc., NAS Gift Company LLC and AS IP Holdings., Inc. (collectively, “Ashley Stewart” or “Debtors”), filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Debtors continues to operate their businesses and manage their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. Additionally, on March 19, 2014, the United States Trustee for Region 3, serving the District of New Jersey, appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors pursuant to section 1102(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Macy's, Inc. Outlines Cost Efficiency Initiatives and Lists Store Locations to Be Closed
    January 6, 2016 Macy’s, Inc. Outlines Cost Efficiency Initiatives and Lists Store Locations to Be Closed CINCINNATI--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Macy’s, Inc. (NYSE:M) today announced a series of cost-efficiency and process improvement measures to be implemented beginning in early 2016 that will reduce SG&A expense by approximately $400 million while still investing in growth strategies, particularly in omnichannel capabilities at Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s. The actions represent progress toward the company’s previously stated goal of re-attaining over time an EBITDA rate as a percent of sales of 14 percent. (Editor’s Note: Macy’s, Inc. this afternoon also issued a separate news release announcing sales results for the November/December 2015 period and updating guidance.) “In light of our disappointing 2015 sales and earnings performance, we are making adjustments to become more efficient and productive in our operations. Moreover, we believe we can operate more effectively with an organization that is flatter and more agile so we can pursue growth and regain market share in our core Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s omnichannel businesses faster and with more intensity. We will continue to invest in strategic initiatives that anticipate emerging customer needs and create shareholder value,” said Terry J. Lundgren, chairman and chief executive officer of Macy’s, Inc. “The cost efficiencies represent more than two-thirds of our goal of annual SG&A expense reduction of $500 million, net of growth initiatives, from previously planned levels by 2018. In some cases, there will be short-term pain as we tighten our belt and realign our resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Store # Phone Number Store Shopping Center/Mall Address City ST Zip District Number 318 (907) 522-1254 Gamestop Dimond Center 80
    Store # Phone Number Store Shopping Center/Mall Address City ST Zip District Number 318 (907) 522-1254 GameStop Dimond Center 800 East Dimond Boulevard #3-118 Anchorage AK 99515 665 1703 (907) 272-7341 GameStop Anchorage 5th Ave. Mall 320 W. 5th Ave, Suite 172 Anchorage AK 99501 665 6139 (907) 332-0000 GameStop Tikahtnu Commons 11118 N. Muldoon Rd. ste. 165 Anchorage AK 99504 665 6803 (907) 868-1688 GameStop Elmendorf AFB 5800 Westover Dr. Elmendorf AK 99506 75 1833 (907) 474-4550 GameStop Bentley Mall 32 College Rd. Fairbanks AK 99701 665 3219 (907) 456-5700 GameStop & Movies, Too Fairbanks Center 419 Merhar Avenue Suite A Fairbanks AK 99701 665 6140 (907) 357-5775 GameStop Cottonwood Creek Place 1867 E. George Parks Hwy Wasilla AK 99654 665 5601 (205) 621-3131 GameStop Colonial Promenade Alabaster 300 Colonial Prom Pkwy, #3100 Alabaster AL 35007 701 3915 (256) 233-3167 GameStop French Farm Pavillions 229 French Farm Blvd. Unit M Athens AL 35611 705 2989 (256) 538-2397 GameStop Attalia Plaza 977 Gilbert Ferry Rd. SE Attalla AL 35954 705 4115 (334) 887-0333 GameStop Colonial University Village 1627-28a Opelika Rd Auburn AL 36830 707 3917 (205) 425-4985 GameStop Colonial Promenade Tannehill 4933 Promenade Parkway, Suite 147 Bessemer AL 35022 701 1595 (205) 661-6010 GameStop Trussville S/C 5964 Chalkville Mountain Rd Birmingham AL 35235 700 3431 (205) 836-4717 GameStop Roebuck Center 9256 Parkway East, Suite C Birmingham AL 35206 700 3534 (205) 788-4035 GameStop & Movies, Too Five Pointes West S/C 2239 Bessemer Rd., Suite 14 Birmingham AL 35208 700 3693 (205) 957-2600 GameStop The Shops at Eastwood 1632 Montclair Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Real Estate Quarterly, Volume 1, Number 4
    Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Real Estate Quarterly Center for Real Estate 11-1-2007 Center for Real Estate Quarterly, Volume 1, Number 4 Portland State University. Center for Real Estate Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/realestate_pub Part of the Real Estate Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Portland State University. Center for Real Estate, "Center for Real Estate Quarterly, Volume 1, Number 4" (2007). Center for Real Estate Quarterly. 25. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/realestate_pub/25 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Real Estate Quarterly by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Center for Real Estate Quarterly 3rd Quarter 2007 • Infrastructure: Toward Smarter Regional Solutions • David Bragdon • Importance of Multi-Block Underground Parking • Will Macht • Industrial Development Trends • Roger Qualman • Outside Investor Trends • Lisa LaManna • National Economic, Office, Housing & Condominium Market Reviews • Center for Real Estate Quarterly 3rd Quarter 2007 Table of Contents: Page: 2. Editor’s Journal: An Urban Development Journal • Will Macht 8. Infrastructure: Toward Smarter Regional Solutions • David Bragdon 18. Importance of Multi-Block Underground Parking • Will Macht 30. Industrial Development Trends • Roger Qualman 36. Outside Investor Trends • Lisa LaManna
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia ' Shistoricrichmondregi On
    VIRGINIA'S HISTORIC RICHMOND REGION GROUPplanner TOUR 1_cover_17gtm.indd 1 10/3/16 9:59 AM Virginia’s Beer Authority and more... CapitalAleHouse.com RichMag_TourGuide_2016.indd 1 10/20/16 9:05 AM VIRGINIA'S HISTORIC RICHMOND REGION GROUP TOURplanner p The Virginia Museum of Fine Arts’ permanent collection consists of more than 35,000 works of art. © Richmond Region 2017 Group Tour Planner. This pub- How to use this planner: lication may not be reproduced Table of Contents in whole or part in any form or This guide offers both inspira- by any means without written tion and information to help permission from the publisher. you plan your Group Tour to Publisher is not responsible for Welcome . 2 errors or omissions. The list- the Richmond region. After ings and advertisements in this Getting Here . 3 learning the basics in our publication do not imply any opening sections, gather ideas endorsement by the publisher or Richmond Region Tourism. Tour Planning . 3 from our listings of events, Printed in Richmond, Va., by sample itineraries, attractions Cadmus Communications, a and more. And before you Cenveo company. Published Out-of-the-Ordinary . 4 for Richmond Region Tourism visit, let us know! by Target Communications Inc. Calendar of Events . 8 Icons you may see ... Art Director - Sarah Lockwood Editor Sample Itineraries. 12 - Nicole Cohen G = Group Pricing Available Cover Photo - Jesse Peters Special Thanks = Student Friendly, Student Programs - Segway of Attractions & Entertainment . 20 Richmond ; = Handicapped Accessible To request information about Attractions Map . 38 I = Interactive Programs advertising, or for any ques- tions or comments, please M = Motorcoach Parking contact Richard Malkman, Shopping .
    [Show full text]
  • (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Jonathan I. Levine
    Case 12-44027-dml11 Doc 132 Filed 07/31/12 Entered 07/31/12 20:15:33 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 125 Paul N. Silverstein (admitted pro hac vice) Jason S. Brookner Jonathan I. Levine (admitted pro hac vice) Texas State Bar No. 24033684 ANDREWS KURTH LLP ANDREWS KURTH LLP 450 Lexington Avenue, 15th Floor 1717 Main Street, Suite 3700 New York, New York 10017 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (212) 850-2800 Telephone: (214) 659-4400 Facsimile: (212) 850-2929 Facsimile: (214) 659-4401 Proposed Counsel to the Debtors IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION In re: § Chapter 11 § FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES § Case No. 12-44027-DML-11 CORP., et al., § § Jointly Administered Debtors. § GLOBAL NOTES AND STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS, METHODOLOGY, AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THE DEBTORS’ STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL AFFAIRS AND SCHEDULES1 The Schedules of Assets and Liabilities (the “Schedules”) and the Statements of Financial Affairs (the “Statements”) filed by the above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”),2 in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”), were prepared pursuant to Section 521 of the Bankruptcy Code (as defined below) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1007 by the Debtors’ management and are unaudited. While those members of the Debtors’ management responsible for the preparation of the Schedules and Statements have made a reasonable effort to ensure that the Schedules and Statements are accurate and complete based on information known to them at the time of preparation after reasonable inquiries, inadvertent errors may exist and/or the subsequent receipt of information may result in material changes in financial and other data contained in the Schedules and Statements that may warrant amendment of the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comments Received for Route 77
    Route 77 Community Meeting - Oct 14, 2020 Public Comments & Questions 79 22 NAME Comments In favor Opposed Other October 7, 2020 Dear Sir/Madam; I watched for years as the old route 16 bus traversed Grove Ave. with few if any passengers and marveled at the waste of fuel, manpower, equipment and parking spaces. I pondered as to how such an unproductive route could be justified and who was paying the bill? In all those years I only saw the bus pick up twice at the stop at Grove and Granby. Fortunately, someone finally had an epiphany and discontinued the route. So, my questions are: 1. Who decided and why are you resurrecting a historically unproductive route? 2. What study, data and criteria was used to justify a reinstatement of this route? 3. I have yet to see any riders in nearly one month of operation of this new route. Since GRTC will obviously lose money on this endeavor, who will be paying for this decision? 4. At least the old route 16 only travelled East on Grove and returned West via Hanover Ave. This resulted in far less of an impact on Grove parking and traffic than the current set up with stops on both sides of our street. Why was this done? In case you haven’t noticed there is and has been a critical shortage of parking in the Fan! The two stops on Grove at Meadow eliminates at least 6 parking spaces at just one intersection. This, coupled with designated church parking has made our parking situation in the 1900 block of Grove Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Feels the Pressure for Increased Housing Densities
    Research & Forecast Report RICHMOND Accelerating success. Q1 2017 | Multifamily Richmond Feels the Pressure for Increased Housing Densities NATIONAL The national investment sale activity showed a sharp decline in more apartments being built downtown and more apartments all real estate sectors in the first quarter of 2017, including the and townhouses being built in the suburbs. Andrew Florance, sale of institutional quality multi-family communities. Per Real Costar founder and CEO, stated recently at a ULI function that Capital Analytics, activity fell 35% YOY, primarily due to the lack Richmond currently has a shortage of nearly 20,000 residential of quality assets coming to the market. The lack of product has units and that there are only six existing units for every ten further stimulated cap rate compression, in turn increasing prices households in need of one. Despite that fact, per Florance, the and providing incentives for owners to reconsider their current Richmond area rental rates and incomes have kept a steady investment horizon. Also, Institutional investors are being drawn pace, unlike that in Primary and Gateway markets. from the Primary and Gateway markets to the Secondary and Tertiary The driving force behind this growth is the Millennial generation, markets in the pursuit of potentially higher yields. Richmond is one the country’s largest generation. Millennials have shown that of the markets benefiting from this action. they are partial to rental housing over ownership and Colliers RICHMOND International predicts that this trend will continue well into the future. Richmond is a prime example. Per Zillow, a Seattle- Richmond is feeling the pressure to increase residential densities based real estate and rental research firm, more Millennials live to accommodate the housing needs for a growing population of alone in Richmond than in any other major U.S.
    [Show full text]