Marco Baroni on the Gap Between Theoretical and Computational

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marco Baroni on the Gap Between Theoretical and Computational On the gap between theoretical and computational linguistics Marco Baroni EACL April 21th, 2021 Facebook AI Research Foreword 1 • Theoretical linguistics: • Syntax in the generative tradition • 68% of articles in last issues of 3 highest-impact linguistics journals • Computational linguistics: • Deep learning for NLP • 40% of long papers at last EACL had a deep-learning keyword in the title 2 Foreword 2 • My attitude here: • Ask not what theoretical linguistics can do for you – ask what you can do for theoretical linguistics (JFK) • ... but theoretical linguists should also do their part to bridge the gap: • Better experimental practices • Less theory-internal argumentation • Larger corpus data coverage 3 Outline • Deep learning for deep linguistics • The gap • The theoretical significance of deep nets • Conclusion: can we narrow the gap? 4 Deep nets’ shocking grammatical competence 5 Long-distance number agreement Structures, not strings! • The boy is jumping • The boy [that I saw yesterday with the girls and the dogs on the rocks] is jumping 6 Long-distance agreement in neural language models • Problem formulation in Linzen et al. TACL 2016 • Given prefix... The boy that I saw yesterday with the girls and the dogs on the rocks... • Does pre-trained neural language model assign higher probability to continuation... Model got agreement right is OR are Model got agreement wrong 7 Long-distance agreement in Results from: neural language models Gulordava et al. NAACL 2018 • Vanilla LSTM language models trained on Wikipedia samples guess right number agreement with high accuracy • in English, Hebrew, Italian and Russian • in a variety of constructions (subJect-verb, noun-adJective, verb- verb...) • in nonsense sentences: • The colorless green ideas [that I ate yesterday with the chair] sleep furiously • with accuracy comparable to that of human subJects. Result also holds for other (CNNs: Bernardy and Lappin LILT 2017, Transformers: Goldberg arXiv 2019) 8 What do the long-distance agreement experiments teach us? • Neural language models possess awesome grammatical skills! • Such skills can then be acquired without supposedly fundamental innate priors such as a preference for tree-like structures 9 Learning music helps you read! Papadimitriou and Jurafsky EMNLP 2020 Image source: Pixabay 10 Learning music helps you read! Papadimitriou and Jurafsky EMNLP 2020 • Train LSTM model on non-linguistic data • Freeze LSTM weights • Fine-tune input and output embeddings on Spanish • Compute perplexity on Spanish text 11 Random The random corpora are sampled randomly from the Spanish Uniform: marroquın´ jemer pertenecer vocabulary. There is no underlying structure of any kind that osasuna formaron citoesqueleto links words with each other. All words are equally likely to relativismo be sampled in the Uniform corpus, while common words are more likely in the Zipfian corpus. Zipf: en con conocidas y en los victoriano como trabajar unk monte * en juegos dıas´ Random en el h i The random corpora are sampled randomly from the Spanish Pre-training sourcesUniform: marroquın´ jemer pertenecerMusic vocabulary. There is no underlying structure of any kind that osasuna formaron citoesqueleto links words with each other. All words are equally likely to The music data is encoded from classical piano performances relativismo be sampled in the Uniform corpus, while common words areaccording to the MAESTRO standard. Music is structured on more likely in the Zipfian corpus. Zipf: en con conocidas y en los victoriano many levels. The red arrow in the example illustrates how, on como trabajar unk monte * en juegos dıas´ a small timescale, each note is linked to its corresponding note Random en el h i The random corpora are sampled randomly from the Spanish when a motif is repeated but modulated down a whole-step. Music Uniform: marroquın´ jemer pertenecer vocabulary. ThereCode is no underlyingThe music structure data is encoded of any from kind classical that piano performances osasuna formaron citoesqueleto links words with each other. Allaccording words to the are MAESTRO equally standard. likely Music to is structured onThe code corpus is composed of Java code. The above snippet if (coordFactormany levels. The == red arrow 1.0f) in the example illustrates how, on relativismo a small timescale, each note is linked to its corresponding notedemonstrates some kinds of structure that are present in code: be sampled in the Uniformreturn corpus, sumExpl while common words are more likely in the Zipfian corpus.when a motif is repeated but modulated down a whole-step. brackets are linked to their pairs, else statements are linked Zipf: en con conocidas y en los victoriano else { to an if statement, and coreference of variable names is Code result = sum coordFactor como trabajar unk monte * en juegos dıas´ The code corpus is* composed of Java code. The above snippetunambiguous. h i if (coordFactor == 1.0f) } demonstrates some kinds of structure that are present in code: en el return sumExpl brackets are linked to their pairs, else statements are linked else { to an if statement, and coreference of variable names is Music result = sum * coordFactorParentheses unambiguous. } The music data is encoded from classical piano performances Our artificial corpora consist of pairs of matching integers. In according to theNesting: MAESTRO standard. Music is structured on the Nesting Parentheses corpus, integer pairs nest Parentheses many levels. The red arrow inOur the artificial example corpora illustrates consist of pairs how, of matching on integers. Inhierarchically and so the arcs do not cross. In the Flat Nesting: a small timescale, each note isthe linked Nesting to Parentheses its corresponding corpus, integer note pairs nest Parentheses corpus, each integer pair is placed independently hierarchically and so the arcs do not cross. In the Flat of all the others, and so the arcs can cross multiple times. when a motif is repeated but modulatedParentheses corpus, down each a integer whole-step. pair is placed independently 0 29 29 0 0of all5 the5 others,0 1016 and so1016 the arcs can9 8 cross8 multiple28 28 times.9 (There is a one-to-one mapping between Spanish words and Code 0 29 29 0 0 5 5 0 1016 1016 9 8 8 28 28 9 The code corpusFlat: is composed(There of Java is a code. one-to-one The mapping above between snippet Spanish words and integers and so these integers are sampled from the same if (coordFactor == 1.0f) Flat: demonstrates some kinds of structureintegers and that so these are integers present arein sampled code: from the same Spanish vocabulary distribution as the Random Zipfian return sumExpl Spanish vocabulary distribution as the Random Zipfian brackets are linked to their pairs,corpus.else We visualizestatements these corpora are herelinked with integers and thecorpus. We visualize these corpora here with integers and the else { Random corpora with words for simplicity). Random corpora with words for simplicity). 21 13 21 6294to13 an6294if5 5471statement,5 32 3221 and547113 coreference21 6294 13 of6294 variable5 5471 names5 32 is32 5471 result = sum * coordFactor unambiguous. } Figure 3: Examples illustrating the contentFigure of our3: Examplesnon-linguistic illustrating corpora for Experiments the content 1-3. of All our examples non-linguistic12 are corpora for Experiments 1-3. All examples are taken from the corpora. Parentheses taken from the corpora. Our artificial corpora consist of pairs of matching integers. In Nesting: The Zipfian Randomthe baselineNesting is Parentheses controlled for corpus,the integerabstract pairsstructural nest features that these corpora vocabulary distribution:hierarchically if an experiment andThe so yieldsZipfian the arcsshare Random do not with cross. natural baseline In language the Flatis controlled in a generalizable for waythe abstract structural features that these corpora better results than the Zipfian Random baseline, we that’s usable to model human language? Parentheses corpus,vocabulary each integer distribution: pair is placed if an independently experiment yields share with natural language in a generalizable way cannot attribute its successof all only the to others, lexical-level and so sim- the arcs can cross multiple times. ilarity to the L2. Therefore, modelsbetter that are results more than4.1 the Data Zipfian Random baseline, we that’s usable to model human language? 0 29 29 0 0 5 5 0 1016 1016 9 8 8 28 28 9 successful than the Zipfian(There baseline is a one-to-onecannot at transfer attribute mapping to For its between our success music Spanish only data we to use wordslexical-level the MAESTRO and sim- dataset human language wouldintegers have useful, andilarity so generalizable these to integers the L2.of areHawthorne Therefore, sampled et from al. models(2018 the). same The that MAESTRO are more dataset4.1 Data Flat: syntactic information about the structures that link Spanish vocabularysuccessful distribution thanembeds the as Zipfian the MIDI Random files baseline of Zipfian many at parallel transfer notes to into a tokens. linear format suitable for sequence modelling, with-For our music data we use the MAESTRO dataset corpus. We visualizehuman language these corpora would here have with useful, integers generalizable and the Random corpora with wordsout for losingsimplicity). musical information. The final corpusof Hawthorne et al. (2018). The MAESTRO dataset 21 13 21 6294 13 6294 5 5471 5 32432 Experiment5471 2: Non-linguistic structure syntactic informationhas a vocabulary about the of 310 structures tokens,
Recommended publications
  • Theoretical Linguistics, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Action-based grammar Citation for published version: Kempson, R, Cann, R, Gregoromichelaki, E & Chatzikyriakidis, S 2017, 'Action-based grammar', Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 141-167. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2017-0012 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1515/tl-2017-0012 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Theoretical Linguistics General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 29. Sep. 2021 Theoretical Linguistics 2017; 43(1-2): 141–167 Ruth Kempson, Ronnie Cann, Eleni Gregoromichelaki and Stergios Chatzikyriakidis Action-Based Grammar DOI 10.1515/tl-2017-0012 1 Competence-performance and levels of description First of all we would like to thank the commentators for their efforts that resulted in thoughtful and significant comments about our account.1 We are delighted that the main thesis we presented – the inclusion of interactive language use within the remit of grammars – seems to have received an unexpected consensus from such diverse perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching (Theoretical) Linguistics in the Second Language Classroom: Beyond Language Improvement
    PORTA LINGUARUM 22, junio 2014 161-171 Teaching (Theoretical) Linguistics in the Second Language Classroom: Beyond Language Improvement MAITE CORREA Colorado State University Received: 13 July 2012 / Accepted: 7 February 2013 ISSN: 1697-7467 ABSTRACT: Linguistics enjoys a paradoxical place in second language (SL) teaching. Un- like students majoring in Linguistics who see it as “study of the mind”, those who take it as part of a language degree see it as relevant as far as it supports language learning. However, a good command of the language is not sufficient for effective teaching. I address the need to revise the place of linguistics in SL curricula and present an innovative teaching approach that analyzes language in a scientific, systematic manner while focusing on those aspects of language that are of direct relevance to future language teachers. Keywords: Theoretical linguistics, pedagogy, teacher education, teacher learning, educa- tional linguistics. La enseñanza de lingüística (teórica) en la clase de ELE: más allá de la mejora comu- nicativa RESUMEN: La lingüística ocupa un lugar paradójico en los departamentos de didáctica de la lengua extranjera: aunque en los departamentos de Filología se ve como una “ventana a la mente”, en los de didáctica se ve como un apoyo al aprendizaje de la lengua por parte del futuro profesor. En este artículo reviso el lugar de la lingüística en el currículo de enseñan- za de segundas lenguas y presento un enfoque a la enseñanza de la lingüística que, siendo sistemático y científico, también se enfoca en aquellos aspectos relevantes para los futuros maestros de lengua extranjera.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistics in Applied Linguistics: a Historical Overview
    JOURNAL OF ENGLISH STUDIES - VOLUME 3, (2001-2), 99-114 LINGUISTICS IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW TONY HARRIS University of Granada ABSTRACT. This paper looks at some of the underlying reasons which might explain the uncertainty surrounding applied linguistics as an academic enquiry. The opening section traces the emergence of the field through its professional associations and publications and identifies second and foreign language (L2) teaching as its primary activity. The succeeding section examines the extent to which L2 pedagogy, as a branch of applied linguistics, is conceived within a theoretical linguistic framework and how this might have changed during a historical period that gave rise to Chomskyan linguistics and the notion of communicative competence. The concluding remarks offer explanations to account for the persistence of linguistic parameters to define applied linguistics. 1. INTRODUCTION Perhaps the most difficult challenge facing the discipline of applied linguistics at the start of the new millennium is to define the ground on which it plies its trade. The field is not infrequently criticised and derided by the parent science, linguistics, which claims authority over academic terrain that applied linguists consider their own. It should be said, however, that applied linguists themselves seem to attract such adversity because of the lack of consensus within their own ranks about what it is they are actually engaged in. The elusiveness of a definition that might string together an academic domain of such wide-ranging diversity, which appears to be in a perennial state of expansion, makes definitions unsafe, not to say time-bound, and in this sense Widdowson’s (2000a: 3) likening of the field to “the Holy Roman Empire: a kind of convenient nominal fiction” is uncomfortably close to the 99 TONY HARRIS truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Linguistic Theory About This Course
    Introduction to Linguistic Theory 01:615:201, Sections 01–04 Fall 2017 Lecture time and location: Milledoler Hall Rm 100, Tuesdays 1:10–2:30pm Course website: sakai.rutgers.edu Lecturer: Adam Jardine Email: [email protected] Office: Linguistics Department (18 Seminary Pl), Rm 303 Office hours: Tuesdays and Wednesdays, 11:00am–12:00pm Recitations: Thursdays 1:10–2:30pm Locations & TAs: Sect. TA Email (@rutgers.edu) Location Office hours 01 EileenBlum eileen.blum ScottHallRm206 Th3-4pm 02 AngLi ang.li.aimee Hardenbergh Hall Rm A5 Th 4-5pm 03 Hazel Mitchley hazel.mitchley CampbellHallRmA3 We4-5pm 04 LydiaNewkirk lydia.newkirk ScottHallRm105 Tu4–5pm TA Office: Linguistics Department (18 Seminary Pl) basement About this course This course is an introduction to the study of linguistics and contemporary linguistic theory and analysis. Linguistics is the scientific study of human language, and theoretical linguists use for- mal systems to develop precise theories that help us understand the incredibly rich cognitive processes that allow us to use language to communicate with each other, conduct an internal monologue, and so much more. In this course, we’ll focus on several key areas of modern linguistic theory: morphology (the study of words and word formation), syntax (the study of how sentences and phrases are built and structured), semantics (the study of how words and phrases are associated with meaning), and phonetics (the study of “speech sounds”) and phonology (the study of linguistic “sound” patterns) (scare quotes because we can also study the phonetics and phonology of signed lan- guages!). 1 Jardine LING201syllabus 2 Course learning goals At the completion of this course, students will be able to: • Understand significant subfields within linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Linguistics 2016; 42(3-4): 291–296
    Theoretical Linguistics 2016; 42(3-4): 291–296 Comments Gregory M. Kobele* and Jason Merchant The Dynamics of Ellipsis DOI 10.1515/tl-2016-0013 1 Introduction Kempson, Cann, Gregoromichelaki, and Chatzikyriakidis (henceforth KCGC) report on a theory of ellipsis in the idiom of Dynamic Syntax, and contrast it with other approaches. Underlying this contrast is the assumption that other grammatical traditions either must, or at least choose to, treat all sentence fragments as instances of ellipsis. This assumption is discussed further in Kobele (2016). We think that the question of whether to analyze a particular sentence fragment in terms of ellipsis should be influenced by empirical considerations. Standard diagnostics for the presence of ellipsis (as laid out for example in Merchant [2013b]) would not suggest that most of what is discussed is in fact elliptical. Fragments themselves come in many stripes, and some may have sentential sources (and thus be thought of as elliptical, such as fragment answers, as analyzed in Merchant [2004]), and many others may not (such as names, titles, and clarificational phrases, among the many others listed in Merchant [2010]). Merchant (2016) scrutinizes the fragments in KCGC from this perspective. We will not here attempt to undertake this work, but rather restrict our attention to cases such as VP-ellipsis or predicate ellipsis that all approaches agree form central ellip- tical explicanda. In this response we take a step back and focus on the basic idea on which KCGC’s theory of ellipsis is based. This fundamental idea is in fact shared by many of the approaches KCGC critique.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complementarity Between Theoretical Linguistics, Neurolinguis Linguistic Portfolios–ISSN 2472-5102 –Volume 6, 2017 | 2
    Linguistic Portfolios Volume 6 Article 2 2017 The ompleC mentarity between Theoretical Linguistics, Neurolinguistics, and Communication Sciences and Disorders Deanna Yoder-Black St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling Part of the Applied Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Yoder-Black, Deanna (2017) "The ompC lementarity between Theoretical Linguistics, Neurolinguistics, and Communication Sciences and Disorders," Linguistic Portfolios: Vol. 6 , Article 2. Available at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling/vol6/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistic Portfolios by an authorized editor of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The ompleC mentarity between Theoretical Linguistics, Neurolinguistics, and Communication Sciences and Disorders Cover Page Footnote This paper was presented as the keynote address to the Minnesota Undergraduate Linguistics Symposium, held at St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN, in April 2016. This article is available in Linguistic Portfolios: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling/vol6/iss1/2 Yoder-Black: The Complementarity between Theoretical Linguistics, Neurolinguis Linguistic Portfolios–ISSN 2472-5102 –Volume 6, 2017 | 2 THE COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN THEORETICAL LINGUISTICS, NEUROLINGUISTICS, AND COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS DEANNA YODER-BLACK MS, CCC-SLP/L ABSTRACT As science evolves, there is an ever-increasing interplay between disciplines. In Communication Sciences and Disorders interdisciplinary theory is needed because of a number of factors such as the growing detail in imaging technology, the development of new strategies in the identification and the treatment of disease, and the nuances that arise in fields that have become more and more specialized.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Linguistics Introduction: Linguistics Is Defined As the Scientific Study of Language
    People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research Level: First year University of M’sila Teacher: Ms. BENSAID Module: Linguistics Faculty of Letters and Languages - Department of English Group : 04, 05 & 06 Lecture: Theoretical linguistics Introduction: Linguistics is defined as the scientific study of language. The word “ linguistics” was first used in the middle of the 19th C to underline the difference between a modern approach to language study that was then developing and a more traditional approach of philology. Philologists were concerned with the historical development of languages whereas linguists tends to give priority to spoken languages as well as to the problems of analyzing them as they operate at a given point in time. Linguistics can be devided into two main branches; applied linguistics and theoritical linguistics which is the main concern of this paper. I. Theoretical linguistics: Theoretical linguistics is the branch of linguistics that inquires into the nature of language or languages without regard for practical applications. It focuses on the examination of the structure of natural languages. The aim of theoretical linguistics is the construction of a general theory of the structure of language, or of a general theoretical framework for language description. "Briefly, theoretical linguistics studies language and languages with a view to constructing a theory of their structure and functions and without regard to any practical applications that the investigation of language and languages might have, whereas applied linguistics has as its concerns the application of the concepts and findings of linguistics to a variety of practical tasks, including language-teaching." (Lyons 1981:35).
    [Show full text]
  • SKY Journal of Linguistics Is Published by the Linguistic Association of Finland (One Issue Per Year)
    SKY Journal of Linguistics is published by the Linguistic Association of Finland (one issue per year). Notes for Contributors Policy: SKY Journal of Linguistics welcomes unpublished original works from authors of all nationalities and theoretical persuasions. Every manuscript is reviewed by at least two anonymous referees. In addition to full-length articles, the journal also accepts short (3-5 pages) ‘squibs’ as well as book reviews. Language of Publication: Contributions should be written in either English, French, or German. If the article is not written in the native language of the author, the language should be checked by a qualified native speaker. Style Sheet: A detailed style sheet is available from the editors, as well as via WWW at http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/skystyle.shtml. Abstracts: Abstracts of the published papers are included in Linguistics Abstracts and Cambridge Scientific Abstracts. SKY JoL is also indexed in the MLA Bibliography. Editors’ Addresses (2005): Pentti Haddington, Department Finnish, Information Studies and Logopedics, P.O. Box 1000, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland (e-mail [email protected]) Jouni Rostila, German Language and Culture Studies, FIN-33014 University of Tampere, Finland (e-mail [email protected]) Ulla Tuomarla, Department of Romance Languages, P.O. Box 24 (Unioninkatu 40B), FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland (e-mail [email protected]) Publisher: The Linguistic Association of Finland c/o Department of Linguistics P.O. Box 4 FIN-00014 University of Helsinki Finland http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky The Linguistic Association of Finland was founded in 1977 to promote linguistic research in Finland by offering a forum for the discussion and dissemination of research in linguistics, both in Finland and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Problems in Applied Linguistics: Limiting the Scope
    LANGUAGE PROBLEMS IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS: LIMITING THE SCOPE A. Effendi Kadarisman ([email protected]) Universitas Negeri Malang Jalan Semarang 5 Malang 65145, Indonesia Abstract: This article critically discusses the paradigmatic shift in applied linguistics, resulting in a claim that countless real-world language problems fall within its scope, but in reality they weaken the discipline and make it lack a focus. Then it takes a closer look at the nature of these language prob- lems, and picks out, for analysis, real examples of writing problems in ELT in Indonesian context. It further argues that, by focusing primarily on prob- lems in ELT and SLA, applied linguistics reaffirms its well-defined position and underscores its significant contributions to both disciplines. Finally, it concludes the discussion by adding some notes on the question of autonomy in both applied linguistics and in ELT in Indonesia. Keywords: applied linguistics, language problems, paradigmatic shift, ELT in Indonesia, question of autonomy In applied linguistics (AL) today the term ‘language problem’ has become a key concept. Davies (2004) argues that the discipline is primarily devoted to seeking “a practical answer to a language problem” (p. 19). Along this line of argument, McCarthy (2001, p. 1), citing Brumfit (1991, p. 46), states that ap- plied linguistics tries to offer solutions to “real-world problems in which lan- guage is a central issue”; and hence it is appropriately called “a problem-driven discipline” (p. 3). Similarly, Cook and Wei (2009, p. 3) use the term “real- world language problems”, and note that the International Association of Ap- plied Linguistics specifies the term as “practical problems of language and communication” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Comparative Syntax
    Theoretical Comparative Syntax Theoretical Comparative Syntax brings together, for the first time, profoundly influential essays and articles by Naoki Fukui, exploring various topics in the areas of syntactic theory and comparative syntax. The articles have a special focus on the typological differences between English (-type lan- guages) and Japanese (-type languages) and abstract parameters that derive them. Linguistic universals are considered in the light of cross-linguistic variation, and typological (parametric) differences are investigated from the viewpoint of universal principles. The unifying theme of this volume is the nature and structure of invari- ant principles and parameters (variables) and how they interact to give prin- cipled accounts to a variety of seemingly unrelated differences between English and Japanese. These two types of languages provide an ideal testing ground for the principles and their interactions with the parameters since the languages exhibit diverse superficial differences in virtually every aspect of their linguistic structures: word order, wh-movement, grammatical agree- ment, the obligatoriness and uniqueness of a subject, complex predicates, case-marking systems, anaphoric systems, classifiers and numerals, among others. Detailed descriptions of the phenomena and attempts to provide principled accounts for them constitute considerable contributions to the development of the principles-and-parameters model in its exploration and refinement of theoretical concepts and fundamental principles of linguistic theory, leading to some of the basic insights that lie behind the minimalist program. The essays on theoretical comparative syntax collected here present a substantial contribution to the field of linguistics. Naoki Fukui is Professor of Linguistics and Chair of the Linguistics Department at Sophia University, Tokyo.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Linguistics 2016; 42(1-2): 173–201
    Theoretical Linguistics 2016; 42(1-2): 173–201 Philippe Schlenker*, Emmanuel Chemla, Anne M. Schel, James Fuller, Jean-Pierre Gautier, Jeremy Kuhn, Dunja Veselinović, Kate Arnold, Cristiane Cäsar, Sumir Keenan, Alban Lemasson, Karim Ouattara, Robin Ryder and Klaus Zuberbühler Formal monkey linguistics: The debate DOI 10.1515/tl-2016-0010 Abstract: We explain why general techniques from formal linguistics can and should be applied to the analysis of monkey communication – in the areas of syntax and especially semantics. An informed look at our recent proposals shows that such techniques needn’t rely excessively on categories of human *Corresponding author: Philippe Schlenker, Département d’Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut Jean-Nicod (ENS – EHESS – CNRS), Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY, USA, E-mail: [email protected] Emmanuel Chemla, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Département d’Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (ENS – EHESS – CNRS), Paris, France Anne M. Schel, Department of Animal Ecology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands James Fuller, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology (NYCEP), New York, NY, USA; BCC, City University of New York, Bronx, NY, USA Jean-Pierre Gautier, CNRS, Station biologique de Paimpont, Université de Rennes
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Linguistics-Linguistic Typology
    THEORETICAL LINGUISTICS/LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY Language-Cognition new Interface: State of the LINCOM Studies Art Vol. 05 in Phonetics RAMESH KUMAR MISHRA & NARAYANAN SRINIVASAN (eds.) Centre for Behavioural and Cognitive Experimental phonetics and sound change Science (CBCS), University of Allahabad Significant theoretical developments have taken DANIEL RECASENS, FERNANDO SÁNCHEZ MIRET place in language-cognition research in the last few decades. The collected chapters in this book & KENNETH J. WIREBACK (EDS.) provide extensive coverage of important areas of Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Universidad de Salamanca; Miami University this research domain including bilingualism, sentence processing, and embodied cognition. The chapters written by experts provide the This book gathers some contributions from scholars working on the phonetic and reader the most up to date discussion about issues phonological causes of sound change. Experimental evidence collected during the last and controversies while providing theoretical and decades calls for the need to build up better models of sound change which incorporate empirical knowledge about these themes. In spite evidence from articulatory strategies, acoustic variation and perceptual categorization of the wide range of topics covered, there has mechanisms. The papers collected in this book deal with the explanation of several sound been an attempt to make the collection thematically coherent providing the state of the changes, i.e., vowel shift and diphthongization, consonant voicing, assimilation, art in language-cognition research. palatalization, vocalization and retroflexion, and with specific arrangements of places of The chapters have been written for both articulation in sibilant inventories. researchers as well as graduate students interested in basic issues in language-cognition research and Contents: their relevance for larger issues on language and Silvia Calamai & Irene Ricci, «Speech rate and articulatory patterns in Italian nasal-velar clusters».
    [Show full text]