DOCSLIB.ORG

The Empirical Base of Linguistics Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Empirical Base of Linguistics Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology The empirical base of linguistics Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology Carson T. Schütze language Classics in Linguistics 2 science press Classics in Linguistics Chief Editors: Martin Haspelmath, Stefan Müller In this series: 1. Lehmann, Christian. Thoughts on grammaticalization 2. Schütze, Carson T. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology 3. Bickerton, Derek. Roots of language ISSN: 2366-374X The empirical base of linguistics Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology Carson T. Schütze language science press Carson T. Schütze. 2016. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology (Classics in Linguistics 2). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/89 © 2016, Carson T. Schütze Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (CC BY 4.0): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN: 978-3-946234-02-9 (Digital) 978-3-946234-03-6 (Hardcover) 978-3-946234-04-3 (Softcover) 978-1-523743-32-2 (Softcover US) ISSN: 2366-374X DOI:10.17169/langsci.b89.100 Cover and concept of design: Ulrike Harbort Typesetting: Felix Kopecky, Sebastian Nordhoff, Carson T. Schütze Fonts: Linux Libertine, Arimo, DejaVu Sans Mono Typesetting software:Ǝ X LATEX Language Science Press Habelschwerdter Allee 45 14195 Berlin, Germany langsci-press.org Storage and cataloguing done by FU Berlin Language Science Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. For my mother, Dorly Schütze, and the memory of my father, Ted Schütze It is simultaneously the greatest virtue and failing of linguistic theory that sequence acceptability judgments are used as the basic data. (Bever 1970b) Contents Preface (2016) xi Preface (1996) xvii Acknowledgments (1996) xix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Goals ................................. 1 1.2 Approach ............................... 7 1.3 Motivation: Whither Linguistics? ................. 10 1.4 A Working Hypothesis ....................... 13 1.5 Scope and Organization ....................... 15 2 Definitions and Historical Background 19 2.1 Introduction ............................. 19 2.2 A Short History of Grammaticality ................ 20 2.3 The Use of Judgment Data in Linguistic Theory .......... 36 2.3.1 Introduction ......................... 36 2.3.2 The Dangers of Unsystematic Data Collection ...... 37 2.3.3 A Case Study in the Use of Subtle Judgments ...... 41 2.3.4 The Interpretation of the Annotations and Degrees of Bad- ness ............................. 44 2.4 Introspection, Intuition, and Judgment .............. 48 2.5 Conclusion .............................. 52 3 Judging Grammaticality 55 3.1 Introduction ............................. 55 3.2 Tasks that Access Grammaticality ................. 56 3.3 The Nature of Graded Judgments .................. 62 3.3.1 Is Grammaticality Dichotomous? ............. 62 3.3.2 Experiments on Chomsky’s Three Levels of Deviance .. 70 3.3.3 Other Experiments ..................... 74 Contents 3.3.4 Ratings, Rankings, and Consistency ............ 77 3.4 The Judgment Process ........................ 81 3.5 The Interpretation of Judgments with Respect to Competence . 88 3.6 Conclusion .............................. 96 4 Subject-Related Factors in Grammaticality Judgments 97 4.1 Introduction ............................. 97 4.2 Individual Differences: Three Representative Studies ....... 98 4.3 Organismic Factors ......................... 106 4.3.1 Field Dependence ...................... 106 4.3.2 Handedness ......................... 107 4.3.3 Other Organismic Factors ................. 109 4.4 Experiential Factors ......................... 112 4.4.1 Linguistic Training ..................... 112 4.4.2 Literacy and Education ................... 120 4.4.3 Other Experiential Factors ................. 124 4.5 Conclusion .............................. 126 5 Task-Related Factors in Grammaticality Judgments 127 5.1 Introduction ............................. 127 5.2 Procedural Factors .......................... 129 5.2.1 Instructions ......................... 129 5.2.2 Order of Presentation ................... 132 5.2.3 Repetition .......................... 133 5.2.4 Mental State ......................... 138 5.2.5 Judgment Strategy ..................... 142 5.2.6 Modality and Register ................... 144 5.2.7 Speed of Judgment ..................... 146 5.3 Stimulus Factors ........................... 148 5.3.1 Context ........................... 148 5.3.2 Meaning ........................... 157 5.3.3 Parsability .......................... 160 5.3.4 Frequency .......................... 161 5.3.5 Lexical Content ....................... 162 5.3.6 Morphology and Spelling ................. 164 5.3.7 Rhetorical Structure .................... 164 5.4 Conclusion .............................. 165 viii Contents 6 Theoretical and Methodological Implications 167 6.1 Introduction ............................. 167 6.2 Modeling Grammaticality Judgments ............... 168 6.2.1 Previous Work ....................... 168 6.2.2 The Outlines of a Preliminary Model ........... 169 6.2.3 Applications of the Model ................. 177 6.3 Methodological Proposals ...................... 180 6.3.1 Materials .......................... 180 6.3.2 Procedure .......................... 183 6.3.3 Analysis and Interpretation of Results .......... 191 6.4 Conclusion .............................. 197 7 Looking Back and Looking Ahead 199 7.1 Introduction ............................. 199 7.2 Directions for Further Research .................. 201 7.3 The Future in Linguistics ...................... 206 References 209 Indexes 229 Name Index ................................. 229 Subject Index ................................ 235 ix Preface (2016) Since the original version of this book (University of Chicago Press, 1996) went out of print in the 2000s, I have continued to receive inquiries from people asking how they can obtain a copy. I am therefore thrilled that Language Science Press has offered to make the title available again, as part of their Classics in Linguistics series. I would like to thank series editors Stefan Müller and Martin Haspelmath, as well as Sebastian Nordhoff and Felix Kopecky, for their help in making this happen. The content of this new printing is identical to the first printing, with thefol- lowing exceptions: • I have altered the wording in a few places where I found it insufficiently clear or terminologically outdated; • my uses of the term informant(s) have been replaced with consultant(s) or speaker(s), in keeping with current practice (of course, the former term still appears in some quoted passages); • I have updated the reference information for a couple of works that had not been published at the time of the original printing, particularly Cowart (1997); • the original index has been split into name and subject indexes, and both are now more comprehensive. In terms of presentation, the following things have changed: • the format of citations and references has been adapted to LangSci house style, as have other minor typographical choices; • full given names have been added to references whenever available; • since the text has been freshly typeset, the page numbers do not match those of the original printing; however, the (sub)section numbers are un- changed: I suggest using those if it is necessary to specify a location within a chapter. Example numbers are also unchanged. Preface (2016) Importantly, I have not attempted to update the content in light of subsequent relevant research, since this would undoubtedly have compelled me to try to write a whole new book. Of course, linguistics and psycholinguistics have chang- ed a great deal in the 20 years since I completed the original manuscript; e.g., “theoretical” linguistics has notably become more “experimental.” Also, some of my own views on the issues have evolved over those two decades. There are passages in the book that I would have omitted or altered, if I had allowed myself to make any substantive revisions. Instead, I have chosen to restrict all follow- up discussion to this preface. In what follows I try to point readers to works that should allow them to “get up to speed” on intervening developments. For collections that are comprised mainly of papers on topics that are impor- tant in the book, see McNair et al. (1996), Penke & Rosenbach (2004), Kepser & Reis (2005), Borsley (2005), Featherston (2007) and replies in the same journal issue, Featherston & Sternefeld (2007), Featherston & Winkler (2009), and Win- kler & Featherston (2009). My more recent views can be found in the following surveys: Schütze (2006; 2011) and Schütze & Sprouse (2013). There have been (at least) four major developments involving the empirical base of linguistics that anyone interested in the topic should be aware of. 1. The adaptation of the magnitude estimation task from psychophysics to judgment collection (Bard, Robertson & Sorace 1996). This was touted as having numerous potential advantages over the traditional Likert scale task, most or all of which have been subsequently refuted (see Weskott & Fanselow 2011 and Sprouse, Schütze & Almeida 2013). 2. The use of World Wide Web searches to establish attestation, and inferac- ceptability, of certain sentence/construction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/05b2s4wg ISBN 978-3946234043 Author Schütze, Carson T Publication Date 2016-02-01 DOI 10.17169/langsci.b89.101 Data Availability The data associated with this publication are managed by: Language Science Press, Berlin Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The empirical base of linguistics Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology Carson T. Schütze language Classics in Linguistics 2 science press Classics in Linguistics Chief Editors: Martin Haspelmath, Stefan Müller In this series: 1. Lehmann, Christian. Thoughts on grammaticalization 2. Schütze, Carson T. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology 3. Bickerton, Derek. Roots of language ISSN: 2366-374X The empirical base of linguistics Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology Carson T. Schütze language science press Carson T. Schütze. 2019. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology (Classics in Linguistics 2). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/89 © 2019, Carson T. Schütze Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (CC BY 4.0): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN: 978-3-946234-02-9 (Digital) 978-3-946234-03-6 (Hardcover) 978-3-946234-04-3 (Softcover) 978-1-523743-32-2
    [Show full text]
  • Dueling, Honor and Sensibility in Eighteenth-Century Spanish Sentimental Comedies
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2010 DUELING, HONOR AND SENSIBILITY IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY SPANISH SENTIMENTAL COMEDIES Kristie Bulleit Niemeier University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Niemeier, Kristie Bulleit, "DUELING, HONOR AND SENSIBILITY IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY SPANISH SENTIMENTAL COMEDIES" (2010). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 12. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/12 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Kristie Bulleit Niemeier The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2010 DUELING, HONOR AND SENSIBILITY IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY SPANISH SENTIMENTAL COMEDIES _________________________________________________ ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION _________________________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the University of Kentucky By Kristie Bulleit Niemeier Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Ana Rueda, Professor of Spanish Literature Lexington, Kentucky 2010 Copyright © Kristie Bulleit Niemeier 2010 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION DUELING, HONOR AND
    [Show full text]
  • J Ohn S. and J Ames L. K Night F Oundation
    A NNUAL REPORT 1999 T HE FIRST FIFTY YEARS J OHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION he John S. and James L. Kn i ght Fo u n d a ti on was estab- TA B L E O F CO N T E N T S l i s h ed in 1950 as a priva te fo u n d a ti on indepen d en t Tof the Kn i g ht bro t h ers’ n e ws p a per en terpri s e s . It is C h a i r m a n’s Letter 2 ded i c a ted to f urt h ering their ideals of s ervi ce to com mu n i ty, to the highest standards of j o u r n a l i s t ic excell en ce and to the Pr e s i d e n t ’s Message 4 defense of a free pre s s . In both their publishing and ph i l a n t h ropic undert a k i n g s , History 5 the Kn i ght bro t h ers shared a broad vi s i on and uncom m on devo ti on to the com m on wel f a re . It is those ide a l s , as well as Philanthropy Takes Root 6 t h eir ph i l a n t h ropic intere s t s , to wh i ch the Fo u n d a ti on rem a i n s The First Fifty Years 8 f a i t h f u l .
    [Show full text]
  • The Linguistics Wars Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE LINGUISTICS WARS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Randy Allen Harris | 368 pages | 09 Mar 1995 | Oxford University Press Inc | 9780195098341 | English | New York, United States The Linguistics Wars PDF Book As a non-linguist, this book also served as a serviceable introduction to some of the field's basic ideas, and it was interesting to read about Chomsky in his original role. Javascript is not enabled in your browser. It has also been noted that the complex adaptive system view of language is highly compatible with those strands of language evolution research that focus on the cumulative cultural evolution of language see e. We can begin with very simple notions that depend on bodily orientation: front-back, before-after, left-right, etc. The book is certainly not suitable for people outside the field because it involves too much linguistic theory, so in a sense the book fails to do what it wants to do. Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. It''s just a matter of fact. Spivey, M. The major research project was aimed at overcoming this tension by showing that the apparent complexity and variety of language was only superficial, the result of minor changes in a fixed and invariant system. Since the mid-twentieth century, the field of linguistics has been a tumultuous discipline. Jul 30, Tom rated it it was ok. Leaving the myth behind: a reply to Adger The shape of the human language-ready brain. However, Christiansen and Chater , p. Oxford: OUP. Wang Taiwan: Pyramid Press , — It should be stressed that these matters are presented in an entirely different light by intellectual opinion, which has its own tasks and commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Did Pragmatics Comme From
    n°19, Juin 2003, pp. 7-12 Where did pragmatics come from ? Abstract The present study is concerned with the early beginnings of pragmatics. It investigated the linguistic and philosophical backgrounds of this field. It was argued that pragmatics grew within philosophy and its emergence as an independent field Dr. A. HAMAD was, for some time, delayed by the influence of some linguistic Associate Prof. of Linguistics theories especially the generative-transformational theory. An-Najah Nat. University Finally, it was pointed out that this field was freed from the Nablus, Palestine influence of this theory. lthough many scholars, philosophers and A linguists, have been studying various types of pragmatic topics such as indexicality, implicatures, illocutionary force, speech acts, presuppositions, etc. For hundreds of years, pragmatics as a field has not emerged until recently. Not only that, but it has been denied the status of a component of grammar besides the phonological, syntactic, and semantic components which altogether constitute the core components of human language grammar. Critics have questioned the nature and the domain of this field; that is the theoretical as well as the practical status of the field in general. It seems that the scholars’ attitude toward pragmatics has been the result of radical theorizations in the main trend of theoretical linguistics motivated primarily by the structural and ملخص generative-transformational linguistic theories. The تهدف هذه الدراسة للتعرف على present study will attempt to explore briefly the البدايات المبكرة لعلم المقا مية. بحثت background of this field, its development, and the الدراسة في الخلفيات اللغوية والفلسفية reasons that stood behind the delay of its emergence التي تقف وراء هذا العلم.ثم حاولت .and institutionalization الدراسة التدليل على أن علم المقامية Philosophy and the Study of Language قد نشأ في حضن الفلسفة وأن بعض النضريات اللغوية عملت ولبعض In order to have a better understanding of the الوقت على تأخير ظهور هذا العلم.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    A fox knows many things but a hedgehog one big thing Mark Aronoff Stony Brook University 1. Introduction Isaiah Berlin’s little book, The Hedgehog and the Fox (1953), takes its title from a line by the Greek poet Archilochus: πόλλ᾽ οἶδ᾽ ἀλωπηξ ἀλλ᾽ ἐχῖνος ἓν μέγα ‘many [things] knows [a] fox but [a] hedgehog one big [thing]’. Since it is impossible to do justice in a paraphrase to Berlin’s prose, I will quote the relevant passage in full: [T]aken figuratively, the words can be made to yield a sense in which they mark one of the deepest differences which divide writers and thinkers, and, it may be, human beings in general. For there exists a great chasm between those, on one side, who relate everything to a single central vision, one system less or more coherent or articulate, in terms of which they understand, think, and feel—a single, universal, organizing principle in terms of which alone all that they are and say has significance—and, on the other side, those who pursue many ends, often unrelated and even contradictory, connected, if at all, only in some de facto way, for some psychological or physiological cause, related by no moral or aesthetic principle; these last lead lives, perform acts, and entertain ideas that are centrifugal rather than centripetal, their thought is scattered or diffused, moving on many levels, seizing upon the essence of a vast variety of experiences and objects for what they are in themselves, without, consciously or unconsciously, seeking to fit them into, or exclude them from, any one unchanging, all-embracing, sometimes self-contradictory and incomplete, at times fanatical, unitary vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Linguistics Wars Free Ebook
    THE LINGUISTICS WARS DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Randy Allen Harris | 368 pages | 09 Mar 1995 | Oxford University Press Inc | 9780195098341 | English | New York, United States Language wars: the 19 greatest linguistic spats of all time While the entrenched linguists were not looking for a messiah, apparently many of their students were. Dave rated it liked it Jun 06, Trivia About The Linguistics Wars. Use this word at your own risk. This book chronicles both sides of the Generative Semantics vs. The debates followed the usual trajectory of most large-scale clashes, scientific or otherwise. To study this co-ordination of certain sounds with certain meanings is to study language. Albaugh and Kathryn M. Both positions changed dramatically in the course of the dispute--the triumphant Chomskyan position was very The Linguistics Wars from The Linguistics Wars initial one; the defeated generative semantics position was even more transformed. Particularly, it The Linguistics Wars, when you add gender to the mix. Jul 11, David rated it liked it Shelves: linguisticsdid-not-finish. PaperbackThe Linguistics Wars. That drives them to spend hours arguing with strangers on the internet, to go around correcting misspelt signs in the dead of night, or even to threaten acts of violence? Start your review of The Linguistics Wars. Betsy rated it really liked it Jun 10, What can I say about this book. There was a revolution, which colored the field of linguistics for the following decades. There was a revolution, which colored the field of linguistics for the following decades. The repercussions of the Linguistics Wars are still with us, not only in the bruised feelings and late-night war stories of the combatants, and in the contentious mood in many quarters, but in the way linguists currently look at language and the mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Linguistics, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Action-based grammar Citation for published version: Kempson, R, Cann, R, Gregoromichelaki, E & Chatzikyriakidis, S 2017, 'Action-based grammar', Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 141-167. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2017-0012 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1515/tl-2017-0012 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Theoretical Linguistics General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 29. Sep. 2021 Theoretical Linguistics 2017; 43(1-2): 141–167 Ruth Kempson, Ronnie Cann, Eleni Gregoromichelaki and Stergios Chatzikyriakidis Action-Based Grammar DOI 10.1515/tl-2017-0012 1 Competence-performance and levels of description First of all we would like to thank the commentators for their efforts that resulted in thoughtful and significant comments about our account.1 We are delighted that the main thesis we presented – the inclusion of interactive language use within the remit of grammars – seems to have received an unexpected consensus from such diverse perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching (Theoretical) Linguistics in the Second Language Classroom: Beyond Language Improvement
    PORTA LINGUARUM 22, junio 2014 161-171 Teaching (Theoretical) Linguistics in the Second Language Classroom: Beyond Language Improvement MAITE CORREA Colorado State University Received: 13 July 2012 / Accepted: 7 February 2013 ISSN: 1697-7467 ABSTRACT: Linguistics enjoys a paradoxical place in second language (SL) teaching. Un- like students majoring in Linguistics who see it as “study of the mind”, those who take it as part of a language degree see it as relevant as far as it supports language learning. However, a good command of the language is not sufficient for effective teaching. I address the need to revise the place of linguistics in SL curricula and present an innovative teaching approach that analyzes language in a scientific, systematic manner while focusing on those aspects of language that are of direct relevance to future language teachers. Keywords: Theoretical linguistics, pedagogy, teacher education, teacher learning, educa- tional linguistics. La enseñanza de lingüística (teórica) en la clase de ELE: más allá de la mejora comu- nicativa RESUMEN: La lingüística ocupa un lugar paradójico en los departamentos de didáctica de la lengua extranjera: aunque en los departamentos de Filología se ve como una “ventana a la mente”, en los de didáctica se ve como un apoyo al aprendizaje de la lengua por parte del futuro profesor. En este artículo reviso el lugar de la lingüística en el currículo de enseñan- za de segundas lenguas y presento un enfoque a la enseñanza de la lingüística que, siendo sistemático y científico, también se enfoca en aquellos aspectos relevantes para los futuros maestros de lengua extranjera.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistics in Applied Linguistics: a Historical Overview
    JOURNAL OF ENGLISH STUDIES - VOLUME 3, (2001-2), 99-114 LINGUISTICS IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW TONY HARRIS University of Granada ABSTRACT. This paper looks at some of the underlying reasons which might explain the uncertainty surrounding applied linguistics as an academic enquiry. The opening section traces the emergence of the field through its professional associations and publications and identifies second and foreign language (L2) teaching as its primary activity. The succeeding section examines the extent to which L2 pedagogy, as a branch of applied linguistics, is conceived within a theoretical linguistic framework and how this might have changed during a historical period that gave rise to Chomskyan linguistics and the notion of communicative competence. The concluding remarks offer explanations to account for the persistence of linguistic parameters to define applied linguistics. 1. INTRODUCTION Perhaps the most difficult challenge facing the discipline of applied linguistics at the start of the new millennium is to define the ground on which it plies its trade. The field is not infrequently criticised and derided by the parent science, linguistics, which claims authority over academic terrain that applied linguists consider their own. It should be said, however, that applied linguists themselves seem to attract such adversity because of the lack of consensus within their own ranks about what it is they are actually engaged in. The elusiveness of a definition that might string together an academic domain of such wide-ranging diversity, which appears to be in a perennial state of expansion, makes definitions unsafe, not to say time-bound, and in this sense Widdowson’s (2000a: 3) likening of the field to “the Holy Roman Empire: a kind of convenient nominal fiction” is uncomfortably close to the 99 TONY HARRIS truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Linguistic Theory About This Course
    Introduction to Linguistic Theory 01:615:201, Sections 01–04 Fall 2017 Lecture time and location: Milledoler Hall Rm 100, Tuesdays 1:10–2:30pm Course website: sakai.rutgers.edu Lecturer: Adam Jardine Email: [email protected] Office: Linguistics Department (18 Seminary Pl), Rm 303 Office hours: Tuesdays and Wednesdays, 11:00am–12:00pm Recitations: Thursdays 1:10–2:30pm Locations & TAs: Sect. TA Email (@rutgers.edu) Location Office hours 01 EileenBlum eileen.blum ScottHallRm206 Th3-4pm 02 AngLi ang.li.aimee Hardenbergh Hall Rm A5 Th 4-5pm 03 Hazel Mitchley hazel.mitchley CampbellHallRmA3 We4-5pm 04 LydiaNewkirk lydia.newkirk ScottHallRm105 Tu4–5pm TA Office: Linguistics Department (18 Seminary Pl) basement About this course This course is an introduction to the study of linguistics and contemporary linguistic theory and analysis. Linguistics is the scientific study of human language, and theoretical linguists use for- mal systems to develop precise theories that help us understand the incredibly rich cognitive processes that allow us to use language to communicate with each other, conduct an internal monologue, and so much more. In this course, we’ll focus on several key areas of modern linguistic theory: morphology (the study of words and word formation), syntax (the study of how sentences and phrases are built and structured), semantics (the study of how words and phrases are associated with meaning), and phonetics (the study of “speech sounds”) and phonology (the study of linguistic “sound” patterns) (scare quotes because we can also study the phonetics and phonology of signed lan- guages!). 1 Jardine LING201syllabus 2 Course learning goals At the completion of this course, students will be able to: • Understand significant subfields within linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Linguistics 2016; 42(3-4): 291–296
    Theoretical Linguistics 2016; 42(3-4): 291–296 Comments Gregory M. Kobele* and Jason Merchant The Dynamics of Ellipsis DOI 10.1515/tl-2016-0013 1 Introduction Kempson, Cann, Gregoromichelaki, and Chatzikyriakidis (henceforth KCGC) report on a theory of ellipsis in the idiom of Dynamic Syntax, and contrast it with other approaches. Underlying this contrast is the assumption that other grammatical traditions either must, or at least choose to, treat all sentence fragments as instances of ellipsis. This assumption is discussed further in Kobele (2016). We think that the question of whether to analyze a particular sentence fragment in terms of ellipsis should be influenced by empirical considerations. Standard diagnostics for the presence of ellipsis (as laid out for example in Merchant [2013b]) would not suggest that most of what is discussed is in fact elliptical. Fragments themselves come in many stripes, and some may have sentential sources (and thus be thought of as elliptical, such as fragment answers, as analyzed in Merchant [2004]), and many others may not (such as names, titles, and clarificational phrases, among the many others listed in Merchant [2010]). Merchant (2016) scrutinizes the fragments in KCGC from this perspective. We will not here attempt to undertake this work, but rather restrict our attention to cases such as VP-ellipsis or predicate ellipsis that all approaches agree form central ellip- tical explicanda. In this response we take a step back and focus on the basic idea on which KCGC’s theory of ellipsis is based. This fundamental idea is in fact shared by many of the approaches KCGC critique.
    [Show full text]