DOCSLIB.ORG

Treba Ll Fin a L D E Mà Ster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Treba Ll Fin a L D E Mà Ster STUDY OF FARE INTEGRATION OF BICING IN THE STI SYSTEM MÀSTER Treball realitzat per: Adriana Martínez Vidal Dirigit per: Àlvar Garola Crespo Màster en: Enginyeria de Camins Canals i Ports Barcelona, 20/09/2017 Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental TREBALL FINAL DE DE TREBALLFINAL 1 ABSTRACT Urban mobility has recently become one of the main issues of local administrations and transport authorities. The public transport market has notice a clear increase in the mobility volume, since people’s tendency is to move to more complex and diverse daily trips. As a result, the demand of an extensive, intensive, flexible and integrated public transport system is becoming one of the main priorities for city halls and transport authorities. New flexible systems such as public bike sharing (PBS) appeared in many European cities as a solution to provide a complementary mode to cover last-step of trips inside congested areas. Between 2001 and 2011, above 400 schemes were implemented in the west part of Europe (European Commission, 2011). One of the keys of its success is its proper integration with other modes, which can be differentia ted in three different levels: • Physical integration, which responds to allocation of stations near each other to make easier transfers. • Integrated information, providing information about possible transfers between modes • Fare integration, referred to provide a global fare system for different modes. This project aims to study the particular case of Bicing, the large public bike sharing scheme launched in Barcelona in 2007. Defined as flexible, practical and sustainable way to travel, Bicing is known as one of the most popular schemes in Europe. The system is properly integrated with the other modes operating in the city, since its stations are located close to principal hubs in the city and clear information about the scheme is provided. However, no fare integration has been achieved, since the access to the bike sharing is only available to residents and through an electronical card. As a main point of this project, the possibility to fare integrate Bicing under the already consolidated fare integrated system (STI) in Barcelona will be studied. The main motivation is the recently forecast to launch an electronical card called T-Mobilitat that will supply the existing transport tickets in Barcelona, and could delete all access barriers with Bicing. The document will be separated in three parts, in order to firstly organize all available data and as a result of its analysis, study the possibility of fare integrate the scheme. On the one hand, Bicing data will be collected in order to analyze its demand, supply and financial patterns. On the other hand, the already consolidated performance of the STI system will be analysed, so its financial characteristics can be understood and particularized for each of the integrated modes. As a result, the potential demand and the range of competitiveness of Bicing scheme will be deduced as well as the possibility or not to integrate the scheme into the STI. Different scenarios to study the impact will be exposed, subject to the available data. 2 INDEX ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 1. BIKE SHARING SYSTEMS OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 15 1.1 MAIN PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................................................... 15 1.2 MAIN CONDITIONANTS ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.3 COSTS AND BENEFITS............................................................................................................................. 16 1.4 BUSINESS MODELS ................................................................................................................................. 16 1.5 INTEGRATION LEVEL............................................................................................................................... 17 2. BICING................................................................................................................................................................. 19 2.1 MAIN BACKGROUNDS AND PRINCIPLES ............................................................................................. 19 2.2 SYSTEM MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 20 2.3 ACCESS AND PERFORMANCE OF THE SERVICE.................................................................................. 21 2.4 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SERVICE................................................................................................. 21 3. EURPOEAN PUBLIC BIKE SHARING SCHEMES .............................................................................................. 26 3.1 VÉLIB – Paris (France) ............................................................................................................................ 27 3.2 VÉLO’V – Lyon (France).......................................................................................................................... 28 3.3 LE vélo STAR – Rennes La Rochelle (France)...................................................................................... 29 3.4 Santander Cycles – London (England)................................................................................................. 30 3.5 KVB Rad – Cologne (Germany) ............................................................................................................. 31 3.6 BikeMi – Milan (Italy)............................................................................................................................. 32 3.7 Sevici – Seville (Spain)............................................................................................................................ 33 3.8 BiZi – Zaragoza (Spain)........................................................................................................................... 34 3.9 COMPARISON BETWEEN EUROPEAN SCHEMES ............................................................................... 35 4. BICING ANALYSIS (2015).................................................................................................................................. 39 4.1 DEMAND DIAGNOSIS ............................................................................................................................. 39 4.2 INTERMODALITY ..................................................................................................................................... 41 4.3 FINANCING............................................................................................................................................... 41 4.4 INTEGRATION .......................................................................................................................................... 42 4.5 MAIN INDICATORS.................................................................................................................................. 43 5 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM IN BARCELONA ......................................... 47 5.1 MAIN JURIDIC ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................ 47 4.6 THE MAIN TRANSPORT AUTHORITY IN BARCELONA (ATM) ........................................................... 48 4.7 PUBLIC TRANSPORT SUPPLY ................................................................................................................. 49 4.8 MAIN PUBLIC TRANSPORT OPERATORS ............................................................................................. 49 5. INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM (STI) ......................................................................................... 50 3 5.1 PHYSICAL INTEGRATION ........................................................................................................................ 50 5.2 INTEGRATED INFORMATION ................................................................................................................ 51 5.3 FARE INTEGATION SYSTEM (STI) .......................................................................................................... 51 5.4 T-MOBILITAT............................................................................................................................................ 55 5.5 FARE-INTEGRATION PERFORMANCE .................................................................................................. 56 5.6 PRINCIPAL RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 58 6. PUBLIC TRANSPORT ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................... 59 6.1 GLOBAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT ................................................................................................................ 59 6.2 FARE INTEGATED SYSTEM (STI) ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Objetivo Tren 2024
    @transportpublic PromocioTransportPublic @transportpublic www.transportpublic.org [email protected] 93 244 49 70 OBJETIVO TREN 2024 Propuesta ferroviaria para reducir a casi cero las emisiones de CO2 del transporte público en Catalunya / 1a edición: Junio 2020 Autores: Pau Noy Serrano, ingeniero industrial. Ricard Riol Jurado, ingeniero técnico de obras públicas. Colaboradores: Albert Parés i Soldevila, Daniel Pi Noya, Georgina Montesinos Zaragoza, José Luis Rodrigo Jiménez, Josep Maria Olivé i Garcia, Marc Iglesias Pérez, Xavier Lujan Calvo, Javier Paricio Sosa. 2 / 114 ÍNDICE 1. Prólogo ................................................................................................................................ 4 2. ¿Por qué el nuevo Objetivo Tren 2024? ......................................................................... 6 3. ¿Por qué potenciar el ferrocarril? ................................................................................. 14 4. Principios del esquema básico de servicio deseado ................................................... 17 5. Actuaciones prioritarias de infraestructura ................................................................. 21 6. Actuaciones prioritarias no infraestructurales ............................................................ 42 7. Proyectos ferroviarios a estudiar a medio y largo ..................................................... 48 8. Nivel de servicio propuesto para cercanías ................................................................. 53 Conexión ferroviaria del
    [Show full text]
  • LACCEI Paper
    Fourth LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCET’2006) “Breaking Frontiers and Barriers in Engineering: Education, Research and Practice” 21-23 June 2006, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico. Innovative Techniques in Planning and Finance of Public Transportation Projects: Lessons Learned and its Applications Ildefonso Burgos-Gil, PE, MCE General Manager for Mass Transit Development, Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, San Juan, PR, USA, [email protected] Abstract The International Transit Studies Program (ITSP) conducts two study missions each year to provide transit managers from across the United States the opportunity to examine public transportation practices in other countries and regions, with the goal of encouraging innovation domestically. The program is sponsored by the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP), funded by the Federal Transit Administration, and managed by the Eno Transportation Foundation. The subject for the 2005 Fall Study Mission was Innovative Techniques in Planning and Finance of Public Transportation Projects. The mission studied systems in Barcelona, Spain; Copenhagen, Denmark; Shanghai, China; and Osaka, Japan. As a participant, the author had the opportunity to meet with the managers for the different systems and learn and document the experience. This paper presents a more detailed insight on the author’s assigned studied systems in Barcelona, the way it has been integrated to become an effective transit system, its financial model, the lessons learned and its possible applications in Puerto Rico and elsewhere. Keywords integration, transit, planning, finance, public private partnership 1. Introduction The International Transit Studies Program (ITSP) conducts two study missions each year to provide transit managers from across the United States the opportunity to examine public transportation practices in other countries and regions, with the goal of encouraging innovation domestically.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bicycle Schemes
    Division 44 Water, Energy and Transport Recommended Reading and Links on Public Bicycle Schemes September 2010 Reading List on Public Bicycle Schemes Preface Various cities around the world are trying methods to encourage bicycling as a sustainable transport mode. Among those methods in encouraging cycling implementing public bicycle schemes is one. The public bicycle schemes are also known as bicycle sharing systems, community bicycling schemes etc., The main idea of a public bicycle system is that the user need not own a bicycle but still gain the advantages of bicycling by renting a bicycle provided by the scheme for a nominal fee or for free of charge (as in some cities). Most of these schemes enable people to realize one way trips, because the users needn’t to return the bicycles to the origin, which will avoid unnecessary travel. Public bicycle schemes provide not only convenience for trips in the communities, they can also be a good addition to the public transport system. Encouraging public bike systems have shown that there can be numerous short that could be made by a bicycle instead of using motorised modes. Public bike schemes also encourage creative designs in bikes and also in the operational mechanisms. The current document is one of the several efforts of GTZ-Sustainable Urban Transport Project to bring to the policymakers an easy to access list of available material on Public Bike Schemes (PBS) which can be used in their everyday work. The document aims to list out some influential and informative resources that highlight the importance of PBS in cities and how the existing situation could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • White Book of the Sustainable Mobility in the Early XXI Century
    White Book of the Sustainable Mobility in the early XXI century Con laCon colaboración Con la lacolaboración colaboración de: de: de: Con Con la colaboraciónla colaboración de: de: Con la colaboración de: Con laConCon colaboración la la colaboración colaboración de: de: de: Editor: Clúster d’Eficiència Energètica de Catalunya (CEEC) / Via Laietana, 39, 08003 Barcelona Coordination: Jaume Roca (COMSA EMTE), Bàrbara Urdillo (CEEC), MªJosé Viladomiu (Institut Cerdà) Authors: Jordi Castells (ICAEN), Albert Cot (COMSA EMTE), Miquel Cruz (IREC), Albert Fayós (GTD), Albert Guasch (Institut Cerdà), David Huguet (UPC), Marc Iglesias (Institut Cerdà), Jaume Roca (COMSA EMTE), Manel Sanmartí (IREC), Narcís Teixidó (Institut Cerdà), Narcís Vidal (ENDESA), Roberto Villafáfila (CITCEA -UPC) Technical review: Francesc Astals (Department of transport, UPC) Translation and linguistic review: Tick Translations® Design: Kunste Design Studio Index Foreward ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 Conflicts and problems associated with mobility ............................................................... 6 1. Incentive parking and Bus-HOV lanes .............................................................................. 8 2. Urban mobility management .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City Bike Hire Schemes
    1 1 City Bike Hire Schemes - Emerging Trends in Europe 2 3 4 Stephen Parkes 5 6 Institute for Transport Studies 7 University of Leeds 8 Leeds 9 LS2 9JT 10 United Kingdom 11 Tel: +44 (0)113 343 1787 12 [email protected] 13 14 15 Dr Greg Marsden* 16 17 Institute for Transport Studies 18 University of Leeds 19 Leeds 20 LS2 9JT 21 United Kingdom 22 Tel: +44 (0)113 343 5325 23 Fax: +44 (0)113 343 5334 24 [email protected] 25 26 * corresponding author 27 28 Word Count: 5989 + 6 Figures = 7489 29 30 Submission Date: 14/11/2011 TRB 2012 Annual Meeting Paper revised from original submittal. 2 31 City Bike Hire Schemes - Emerging Trends in Europe 32 33 34 Abstract 35 36 This paper examines the recent increase in the uptake of city bike hire (also known as “bike 37 share”) schemes and provides an analysis of the emerging trends that are being witnessed. 38 The paper is based on an ongoing study into the spread and distribution in the adoption of 39 bike hire schemes throughout Europe. The data collection consists of two stages that first 40 seek to build a picture of the current situation before moving on to a more detailed discussion 41 with the scheme adopters. 42 The paper presents a brief history of bike hire schemes and describes the theoretical basis 43 for the investigation, drawing on innovation and diffusion theory. It then reports the findings 44 of the research, which suggests that the expansion phase of city adoption of public bike hire 45 schemes may be past its peak.
    [Show full text]
  • Vergelijkende Studie Van Stedelijke Fietsverhuursystemen
    Academiejaar 2009 – 2010 UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN FACULTEIT TOEGEPASTE ECONOMISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN Vergelijkende studie van stedelijke fietsverhuursystemen Jeroen Jonckheere Masterproef voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van: Master in de Toegepaste Economische Promotor: Wetenschappen logistiek en transport Prof. dr. Ann Verhetsel Academiejaar 2009 – 2010 UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN FACULTEIT TOEGEPASTE ECONOMISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN Vergelijkende studie van stedelijke fietsverhuursystemen Jeroen Jonckheere Masterproef voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van: Master in de Toegepaste Economische Promotor: Wetenschappen logistiek en transport Prof. dr. Ann Verhetsel Voorwoord Een masterproef schrijven is een proces dat ongeveer een jaar duurt. In de loop van dit jaar krijg je hulp van een heleboel mensen. Ik wil dan ook gebruik maken van dit voorwoord om deze mensen te bedanken. De eerste persoon die ik wens te bedanken is professor Ann Verhetsel. Als promotor van mijn masterproef verbeterde zij op gepaste tijden mijn schrijfsels en gaf ze een aantal nuttige adviezen waarmee ik verder aan de slag kon. In tweede instantie zou ik ook Jan Schaeken van het Gemeentelijk Autonoom Parkeerbedrijf Antwerpen willen danken voor het geven van alle informatie die ik nodig had om het Antwerpse stedelijk fietsverhuursysteem te vergelijken met de al bestaande fietsverhuursystemen. In laatste instantie wil ik ook mijn ouders bedanken. Zij hebben er voor gezorgd dat ik 4 jaar lang heb kunnen studeren. Daarnaast wil ik hen ook nog bedanken voor het nalezen
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Metro, Safer and More Efficient
    Automated Metro, safer and more efficient State-of-the-art technology at your service Transports Metropolitans de Barcelona Barcelona, on the road to automation The Barcelona Metro is on the road to automation. The medium- or long-term perspective is for 43% of the TMB network (70 to 160 kilometres) to be automated. The new lines, such as the L9/L10, have been conceived as automated lines and some of the existing ones will be progressively converted. Following L9/10, which was put into operation as an automated line from the outset, L2 will have to be technologically converted and adopt automated operation, as was recently done with L11. This is because, when it is extended to the airport through the Parc Logístic fork, L2 will share part of the infrastructure with L9. The two lines will require compatible trains and systems to operate jointly on the same infrastructure. The benefits of automation TMB’s commitment to automation is consistent 2) More passengers in less time with its desire to provide the best possible service. Automation enables more passengers to The introduction of automated metro systems not be transported in less time using the same only provides more safety, reliability and flexibility infrastructure. Thanks to their sophisticated control while adapting the supply to the demand, it also and monitoring systems, trains can run during peak enables more efficient management of the system times at shorter intervals, under two minutes, with and an increase in the capacity of the networks. An safety totally guaranteed. automated metro system can run with high journey frequencies, complete safety and optimum regularity.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Research Results Digest 77
    May 2006 TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration Subject Areas: IA Planning and Administration, VI Public Transit, VII Rail Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm-Smith Research Results Digest 77 International Transit Studies Program Report on the Fall 2005 Mission INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES IN THE PLANNING AND FINANCING OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS This TCRP digest summarizes the mission performed October 20– November 5, 2005, under TCRP Project J-3, “International Transit Studies Program.” This digest includes transportation information on the cities and facilities visited. This digest was prepared by staff of the Eno Transportation Foundation and is based on reports filed by the mission participants. INTERNATIONAL TRANSIT participants to learn from foreign experience STUDIES PROGRAM while expanding their network of domestic and international contacts for addressing The International Transit Studies Prog- public transport problems and issues. ram (ITSP) is part of the Transit Cooperative The program arranges for teams of pub- Research Program (TCRP). ITSP is managed lic transportation professionals to visit ex- by the Eno Transportation Foundation under emplary transit operations in other countries. contract to the National Academies. TCRP Each study mission focuses on a theme that was authorized by the Intermodal Surface encompasses issues of concern in public Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 and re- transportation. Cities and transit systems to authorized in 2005 by the Safe, Accountable, be visited are selected on the basis of their Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity ability to demonstrate new ideas or unique Act: A Legacy for Users. It is governed by approaches to handling public transportation a memorandum of agreement signed by the CONTENTS challenges reflected in the study mission’s National Academies, acting through its theme.
    [Show full text]
  • Una Nova Aproximació a La Pobresa Infantil
    Una nova aproximació a la pobresa infantil. Aplicació de l'indicador europeu "reference budgets" a Catalunya per a àrees densament poblades 90) - 02 - Irene Maria Cussó Parcerisas http://hdl.handle.net/10803/404842 Generalitat 472 (28 de Catalunya núm. Rgtre. Fund. ió ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de undac la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials F d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efec tuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. Universitat Ramon Llull Universitat Ramon ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o G: 59069740 G: materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Bicycle Options for Federal Lands: Bike Sharing, Rentals and Employee Fleets
    FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 JANUARY 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS Technical Report published by Technology Deployment Program Western Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 For more information or additional copies contact: Susan Law, Planning Team Leader [email protected], 360.619.7840 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rebecca Gleason, Laurie Miskimins 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Western Transportation Institute P.O. Box 174250 11. Contract or Grant No. Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Final Report Western Federal Lands Highway Division August 2009 – July 2011 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 14. Sponsoring Agency Code HFL-17 15. Supplementary Notes COTR: Susan Law – FHWA CFLHD/WFLHD. Advisory Panel Members: Adam Schildge – FTA, Alan Turnbull – NPS RTCA, Andrew Duvall, National Science Foundation IGERT PhD student, Brandon Jutz – FWS, Candace Rutt – CDC, Diana Allen – NPS RTCA, Franz Gimmler – non-motorized consultant, Ivan Levin – Outdoor Foundation, Jane D. Wargo – HHS, Jason Martz – NPS, Jim Evans – NPS, Nathan Caldwell – FWS, Paul DeMaio – Bike Share consultant, Tokey Boswell – NPS. This project was funded by the Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge Road Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Report2007.Pdf
    2007 IN THE MTA Ten years after the creation of the MTA, this 2007 Report contains many elements of enormous importance and individuality that indicate the order of priorities of the Government of the Gene- ralitat and all associated administrative bodies. In the first place, a review of the 2001-2010 Infrastructure Management Plan (IMP), showed the urgent need for the already begun revision and update. The key financial data is that in 2007, there has been a considerable excess, in absolute terms, of the amount of money allo- cated for the whole period of duration of the IMP. More money, but nevertheless, not yet all the improvement work, and some of this pending work still under discussion or modification. This is the case of Metro line 12. The agreement has been to replace it by extensions to some lines and the construction of a new Cornellà-Castelldefels railway line. It is therefore urgent to have a revised IMP that adapts to this new reality. JOAQuim NADAL I FarrEraS The physical translation of the work included in the IMP is now more than evident in the Councillor for Territorial Policy follow-up map. The map is very spectacular and shows the immensity of the process of mo- and Public Works and President of the MTA dernisation, change and adaptation of accesses of the whole public transport network of the metropolitan region. The fact that this enormous volume of work still has few obvious repercus- sions is a problem that must be resolved. This means making the progress of the work and the inconveniences corresponding to its materialisation compatible with the successive enjoyment of the improvements as they are completed and put into practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Tech Capital Bikeshare Study a Closer Look at Casual Users and Operations
    Virginia Tech Capital Bikeshare Study A Closer Look at Casual Users and Operations Prepared by Prepared for DRAFT December 2011 This report is based on the work of these students in the Virginia Tech graduate-level Urban and Regional Planning program, Alexandria, Virginia, during the Fall 2011 semester: Natalie Borecki Bradley Rawls Buck, Darren Buck Paola Reyes Payton Chung Matthew Steenhoek Paticia Happ Casey Studhalter Nicholas Kushner Austin Watkins Tim Maher With the following Virginia Tech faculty member assisting the students in preparing the report: Ralph Buehler, PhD Virginia Tech Assistant Professor Department of Urban Affairs and Planning – Alexandria Campus This research was approved by the Virginia Tech Institutional Review Board (FWA00000572, expires May 31, 2014) under IRB numbers 11-784 and 11-902. Acknowledgments The authors of this report would like to express our gratitude to the following individuals for the information and assistance they provided: Our 340 survey participants Chris Holben - District Department of Transportation, Washington DC Paul DeMaio - MetroBike Danny Quarrell - Alta Bicycle Share Eric Gilliland - Alta Bicycle Share Mari Isabelle - JCDecaux Adam Garrett - OYBike Matt Virlee - Denver Bike Sharing Mitch Vars - Nice Ride Minnesota Iván De la Lanza - Enlace Institucional, SMA - EcoBici Rodrigo Guerrero Maldonado - Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, Mexico City Erik Kugler – BicycleSPACE Fionnuala Quinn – Alta Planning Shi-Hung Huang- Kaohsiung Environmental Protection Bureau Kwo-Tsai Wang - Kaohsiung Transportation Bureau Mu-Sheng Lee - Kaohsiung Environmental Protection Bureau Raúl Ganzinelli Aguilera - Barcelona de Serveis Municipals Jordi Cabañas Faura - Clear Channel International Matthias Wegscheider -CityBike Wien 2 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary, page 4 II. Introduction, page 4 III.
    [Show full text]