DOCSLIB.ORG

Sudan: Country Report the Situation in South Kordofan and Blue Nile – an Update (3Rd Edition with Addendum)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sudan: Country Report the Situation in South Kordofan and Blue Nile – an Update (3Rd Edition with Addendum) Sudan: Country Report The situation in South Kordofan and Blue Nile – An Update (3rd edition with addendum) March 2021 (COI included between 1st May 2019 and 16th December 2020) Commissioned by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Division of International Protection. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the authors. © Asylum Research Centre (ARC), 2021 ARC publications are covered by the Create Commons License allowing for limited use of ARC publications provided the work is properly credited to ARC and it is for non-commercial use. ARC does not hold the copyright to the content of third party material included in this report. Reproduction or any use of the images/maps/infographics included in this report is prohibited and permission must be sought directly from the copyright holder(s). Feedback and comments Please help us to improve and to measure the impact of our publications. We’d be extremely grateful for any comments and feedback as to how the reports have been used in refugee status determination processes, or beyond. Thank you. https://asylumresearchcentre.org/feedback/ Please direct any questions to [email protected] Cover photo: © Asuwan Masae/shutterstock.com 2 CONTENTS Explanatory Note ..................................................................................................................... 8 Sources and databases consulted............................................................................................ 10 List of Acronyms ..................................................................................................................... 15 1. Background information ........................................................................................ 17 1.1. Geographical information ..................................................................................... 17 1.2. Overview of the security situation ......................................................................... 18 1.2.1 Tribal/communal violence .................................................................................... 23 1.3. Peace negotiations/ceasefires ............................................................................... 25 2. Actors involved in the conflict ............................................................................... 31 2.1. Government forces ................................................................................................ 31 2.1.1. Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) ............................................................................. 31 2.1.2. Rapid Support Forces (RSF) .................................................................................. 33 2.1.3. ..... National Intelligence and Security Service (NISS) / General Intelligence Service (GIS)................................................................................................................................ 36 2.1.4. Law enforcement ................................................................................................. 37 2.1.5. Paramilitary militias ............................................................................................. 37 2.1.6. Popular Defence Forces (PDF) ............................................................................. 39 2.1.7. Military service .................................................................................................... 40 2.1.8. Defection from government forces ..................................................................... 40 2.1.9. Forced recruitment of young men....................................................................... 40 2.1.10. Human rights abuses committed & impunity enjoyed by government forces . 41 2.2. Armed opposition groups ...................................................................................... 51 2.2.1. Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army – North (SPLM/A-N) ..................... 52 2.2.2. Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF) ......................................................................... 55 2.2.3. Human rights abuses committed by armed opposition groups .......................... 56 3. Security situation: Impact of the conflict on civilians .............................................. 57 3.1. Aerial bombing campaigns and ground attacks ..................................................... 57 3.1.1. South Kordofan .................................................................................................... 58 3 3.1.2. Blue Nile ............................................................................................................... 58 3.2. Casualties caused by aerial bombing campaigns and ground attacks ..................... 59 3.2.1. South Kordofan .................................................................................................... 59 3.2.2. Blue Nile ............................................................................................................... 59 3.3. Unexploded ordinance (UXO) ................................................................................ 59 3.3.1. Two Areas ............................................................................................................ 59 3.3.2. South Kordofan .................................................................................................... 60 3.3.3. Blue Nile ............................................................................................................... 60 3.4. Forced displacement ............................................................................................. 60 3.4.1. South Kordofan .................................................................................................... 61 3.4.2. Blue Nile ............................................................................................................... 63 3.5. Humanitarian access and freedom of movement ................................................... 63 3.5.1. Two Areas ............................................................................................................ 63 3.5.2. South Kordofan .................................................................................................... 65 3.5.3. Blue Nile ............................................................................................................... 66 4. Rule of Law and access to justice ........................................................................... 67 4.1. Local conflict resolution mechanisms ..................................................................... 67 4.2. Arbitrary arrest and detention ............................................................................... 69 4.3. Unlawful or disproportionate punishment for crimes ............................................. 70 4.4. Death penalty ....................................................................................................... 72 4.5. Detention conditions ............................................................................................. 73 4.5.1. Torture in detention ............................................................................................ 75 5. Human rights situation: civil and political rights ..................................................... 80 5.1. Freedom of expression, association, and assembly ................................................. 80 5.1.1. Political opposition parties, activists and dissidents ........................................... 80 5.1.1. Lawyers as political opposition members and activists ...................................... 83 5.1.2. (Suspected) members of the SPLM/A-N .............................................................. 84 5.1.3. Individuals (perceived to be) associated with or supportive of the SPLM/A-N .. 85 5.1.3.1. Two Areas............................................................................................ 85 5.1.3.2. South Kordofan ................................................................................... 85 5.1.3.3. Blue Nile .............................................................................................. 87 5.1.3.4. Nuba (South Kordofan) ....................................................................... 87 4 5.1.3.5. Other ethnic groups ............................................................................ 94 5.1.3.6. Christians............................................................................................. 94 5.1.4. Freedom of the Media ......................................................................................... 94 5.1.4.1. Treatment of critical journalists, citizen-journalists, bloggers, etc .................. 97 5.1.5. Civil society organizations and civil society activists, including women’s rights activists .......................................................................................................................... 98 5.1.5.1. Demonstrators, protestors and persons speaking out ..................... 100 5.2. Freedom of religion ............................................................................................. 105 5.2.1. Christians ........................................................................................................... 108 5.3. Discrimination against ethnic minorities .............................................................. 112 5.3.1. Two Areas .......................................................................................................... 113 6. Women and girls ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 Highlights
    Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 UNICEF and partners assess damage to communities in southern Khartoum. Sudan was significantly affected by heavy flooding this summer, destroying many homes and displacing families. @RESPECTMEDIA PlPl Reporting Period: July-September 2020 Highlights Situation in Numbers • Flash floods in several states and heavy rains in upriver countries caused the White and Blue Nile rivers to overflow, damaging households and in- 5.39 million frastructure. Almost 850,000 people have been directly affected and children in need of could be multiplied ten-fold as water and mosquito borne diseases devel- humanitarian assistance op as flood waters recede. 9.3 million • All educational institutions have remained closed since March due to people in need COVID-19 and term realignments and are now due to open again on the 22 November. 1 million • Peace talks between the Government of Sudan and the Sudan Revolu- internally displaced children tionary Front concluded following an agreement in Juba signed on 3 Oc- tober. This has consolidated humanitarian access to the majority of the 1.8 million Jebel Mara region at the heart of Darfur. internally displaced people 379,355 South Sudanese child refugees 729,530 South Sudanese refugees (Sudan HNO 2020) UNICEF Appeal 2020 US $147.1 million Funding Status (in US$) Funds Fundi received, ng $60M gap, $70M Carry- forward, $17M *This table shows % progress towards key targets as well as % funding available for each sector. Funding available includes funds received in the current year and carry-over from the previous year. 1 Funding Overview and Partnerships UNICEF’s 2020 Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC) appeal for Sudan requires US$147.11 million to address the new and protracted needs of the afflicted population.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan 2020 Human Rights Report
    SUDAN 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sudan’s civilian-led transitional government, installed in August 2019, is led by Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, who heads the Council of Ministers. There is also a Sovereign Council led by Abdel Fatah al-Burhan, who is one of the five military members, as well as six civilians. The Transitional Legislative Council had not been formed as of year’s end. Under the constitutional declaration signed in August 2019, general elections were scheduled for 2022, but following the signing of the Juba Peace Agreement on October 3, they were postponed to 2024. Under the civilian-led transitional government, responsibility for internal security resides with the Ministry of Interior, which oversees police agencies as well as the Ministry of Defense and the General Intelligence Service. Ministry of Interior police agencies include the security police, special forces police, traffic police, and the combat-trained Central Reserve Police. There is a police presence throughout the country. The General Intelligence Service’s mandate changed from protecting national security and during the year was limited to gathering, analyzing, and submitting information to other security services. The Ministry of Defense has a mandate to oversee all elements of the Sudanese Armed Forces, including the Rapid Support Forces, Border Guards, and defense and military intelligence units. During the year the police infrastructure was largely moved under executive authority to assure it would adhere to its mandate to protect individuals and enforce the laws. Civilian authorities’ control of security forces continued to improve. Nevertheless, members of the security forces committed some abuses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Front and the Struggle Against Marginalization
    3 The Eastern Front and the Struggle against Marginalization By John Young Copyright The Small Arms Survey Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey The Small Arms Survey is an independent research project located at the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva, Switzerland. It serves © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva 2007 as the principal source of public information on all aspects of small arms and First published in May 2007 as a resource centre for governments, policy-makers, researchers, and activ- ists. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior Established in 1999, the project is supported by the Swiss Federal Depart- permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by ment of Foreign Affairs, and by contributions from the Governments of Bel- law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organi- gium, Canada, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the zation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should United Kingdom. The Survey is also grateful for past and current project-spe- be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. cific support received from Australia, Denmark, and New Zealand. Further Small Arms Survey funding has been provided by the United Nations Development Programme, Graduate Institute of International Studies the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, the Geneva 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland International Academic Network, and the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining.
    [Show full text]
  • The Risk for Boys from Poor Communities to Drop out from School: the Case of Khartoum, Sudan
    Yousif & Mohammed. Space and Culture, India 2020, 8:1 Page | 187 https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v8i1.711 RESEARCH OPEN ACCESS The Risk for Boys from Poor Communities to Drop out from School: The Case of Khartoum, Sudan Nagwa Babiker Abdalla Yousif†* and Shadia Abdel Rahim Mohammed¥ Abstract In the current world, poverty and education are interconnected. Low level of education is the cause of poverty, as extreme forms of poverty do not allow many children to get a good education. This study investigates the risk factors that significantly increase the likelihood of pupils dropping out of school in Khartoum, Sudan. To accomplish the research, two factors are selected, namely absenteeism and low performance of pupils from poor, disadvantaged communities. A comprehensive interviewing is used to collect the necessary primary data along with the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) data. The life of pupils is characterised by multi-dimensional poverty apace with illiteracy, displacement and large family size, parents' engagement in low paid jobs. The pupils presented multiple reasons (related to poverty) for their absenteeism and low performance. The results indicate that pupils are not clear with their future perspectives whether to drop out of the school or to continue their studies. The study concludes that poverty is the main reason for absenteeism and low performance that increases the likelihood of pupils dropping out of school. Keywords: School Education; Poor Communities; Absenteeism; Migration; Performance; Sudan †Assistant Professor, College of Humanities and Sciences, Department of Sociology, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates * Corresponding Author, Email: [email protected]; [email protected] ¥Professor, School of Rural Extension Education and Development, Ahfad University for women, Omdurman, Sudan.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan's Spreading Conflict (II): War in Blue Nile
    Sudan’s Spreading Conflict (II): War in Blue Nile Africa Report N°204 | 18 June 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. A Sudan in Miniature ....................................................................................................... 3 A. Old-Timers Versus Newcomers ................................................................................. 3 B. A History of Land Grabbing and Exploitation .......................................................... 5 C. Twenty Years of War in Blue Nile (1985-2005) ........................................................ 7 III. Failure of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement ............................................................. 9 A. The Only State with an Opposition Governor (2007-2011) ...................................... 9 B. The 2010 Disputed Elections ..................................................................................... 9 C. Failed Popular Consultations ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media As a Strategy for Protest Movements in an Era of Government Control By
    Social Media as a Strategy for Protest Movements in an Era of Government Control by Sarah C. Palmieri-Branco 8349343 Submitted to the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs University of Ottawa In the Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts © Sarah Palmieri-Branco, Ottawa, Canada, 2021 Abstract In a new era of surveillance and control, governments have expanded their digital knowledge and strategies to prevent and disband social movements and demonstrations. In light of the resurgence of several protests worldwide, have new technological strategies been employed by protest leaders to counteract government efforts? Have digital tools adapted to government control? This study analyzed how social media has adapted in the face of repression in non-Western protest movements through the analysis of digital strategies evoked by protest leaders to organize demonstrations, mobilize people and persuade the undecided. Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement and the resurgence of protest in the territory in 2019-2020, and Sudan’s 2011-2013 protests and the subsequent 2018-2019 Intifada were chosen as case studies. A thematic analysis approach illustrated the different strategies implemented by both activists and governments and the ways in which social media evolved throughout the protest movements. This highlighted the various ways tools adapted to best facilitate the organization, mobilization and persuasion efforts to counter-act government repression and digital intervention. The technological evolution of social media has created an unprecedented level of transparency that allows for injustices actioned by governments to be shared on an international platform. This has ultimately led to a transfer of power to the people in times of social unrest and protest.
    [Show full text]
  • Migrants in Need of Protection
    A report of the Scalabrini migration study centers The Scalabrini migration study centers consist of the Centro de Estudios Migratorios (CEM) in Brazil, the Centro de Estudios Migratorios Latinoamericanos (CEMLA) in Argentina, the Centre d’Information et d’Études sur les Migrations Internationales (CIEMI) in France, the Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) in the United States, the Centro Studi Emigrazione Roma (CSER) in Italy, the Scalabrini Institute for Human Mobility in Africa (SIHMA) in South Africa, the Scalabrini International Migration Network (SIMN) in the United States, and the Scalabrini Migration Center (SMC) in the Philippines. This report was edited by J. Kevin Appleby, Senior Director for International Migration Policy for CMS and SIMN, and by Donald Kerwin, Executive Director of CMS. The editors would like to thank Fr. Leonir Chiarello, c.s., Executive Director of SIMN, for his leadership and support during the process. Published by the Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) 307 E 60th St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10022 www.cmsny.org Cover Photo: Alun McDonald/Oxfam, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 “A boy walks home to camp Jamam, South Sudan.” International Migration Policy Report: Responsibility Sharing for Large Movements of Refugees and Migrants in Need of Protection A report of the Scalabrini migration study centers June 2017 Asia | Africa | Europe Latin America | North America International Migration Policy Report June 2017 Table of Contents 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • United States Institute of Peace Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Sudan Experience Project
    United States Institute of Peace Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Sudan Experience Project Interview # 19 - Executive Summary Interviewed by: Haven North Initial Interview Date: August 22, 2006 Copyright 2006 USIP & ADST The Interviewee was a high-ranking U.S. official assigned to Sudan from 1992- 95. During this time, the war between the North and the South was being “prosecuted in a brutal way” and “relief operations were being interrupted.” The U.S. “representations or charges (to both sides) were considered by both Governments “without foundation.” Therefore, “the U.S. policy was one of denouncing the excesses of the Sudanese Government, and denouncing their policies such as giving aid and refuge to terrorist organizations.” The Sudanese Government denied these charges, but came to the table to end the rebellion in the South and forge better relations with the West and the U.S. The Clinton Administration was “not as supportive of the SPLA,” but supported the IGAD, even though we did not participate in the negotiations. Former U.S. Ambassadors to Sudan Petterson and Kontos, as a private initiative, met with government and non-government representatives of the North and South. Their conclusion was that, as long as the was going on, there could be no improvement in relations with the U.S., in Sudan’s economy, or in reducing repression and human rights violations. Their recommendations were that the “U.S. should take a direct and important part in an international effort to end the war between the North and South… and reestablish a diplomatic presence. ” These recommendations were rejected by the Clinton Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of South Sudan
    UNITED NATIONS SOUTH SUDAN Geospatial 25°E 30°E 35°E Nyala Ed Renk Damazin Al-Fula Ed Da'ein Kadugli SUDAN Umm Barbit Kaka Paloich Ba 10°N h Junguls r Kodok Āsosa 10°N a Radom l-A Riangnom UPPER NILEBoing rab Abyei Fagwir Malakal Mayom Bentiu Abwong ^! War-Awar Daga Post Malek Kan S Wang ob Wun Rog Fangak at o Gossinga NORTHERN Aweil Kai Kigille Gogrial Nasser Raga BAHR-EL-GHAZAL WARRAP Gumbiel f a r a Waat Leer Z Kuacjok Akop Fathai z e Gambēla Adok r Madeir h UNITY a B Duk Fadiat Deim Zubeir Bisellia Bir Di Akobo WESTERN Wau ETHIOPIA Tonj Atum W JONGLEI BAHR-EL-GHAZAL Wakela h i te LAKES N Kongor CENTRAL Rafili ile Peper Bo River Post Jonglei Pibor Akelo Rumbek mo Akot Yirol Ukwaa O AFRICAN P i Lol b o Bor r Towot REPUBLIC Khogali Pap Boli Malek Mvolo Lowelli Jerbar ^! National capital Obo Tambura Amadi WESTERN Terakeka Administrative capital Li Yubu Lanya EASTERN Town, village EQUATORIAMadreggi o Airport Ezo EQUATORIA 5°N Maridi International boundary ^! Juba Lafon Kapoeta 5°N Undetermined boundary Yambio CENTRAL State (wilayah) boundary EQUATORIA Torit Abyei region Nagishot DEMOCRATIC Roue L. Turkana Main road (L. Rudolf) Railway REPUBLIC OF THE Kajo Yei Opari Lofusa 0 100 200km Keji KENYA o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 50 100mi CONGO o e The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan: International Dimensions to the State and Its Crisis
    crisis states research centre OCCASIONAL PAPERS Occasional Paper no. 3 Sudan: international dimensions to the state and its crisis Alex de Waal Social Science Research Council April 2007 ISSN 1753 3082 (online) Copyright © Alex de Waal, 2007 Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in this Occasional Paper, the Crisis States Research Centre and LSE accept no responsibility for the veracity of claims or accuracy of information provided by contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of the publisher nor be issued to the public or circulated in any form other than that in which it is published. Requests for permission to reproduce this Occasional Paper, or any part thereof, should be sent to: The Editor, Crisis States Research Centre, LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE 1 Crisis States Research Centre Sudan: International Dimensions to the State and its Crisis Alex de Waal Social Science Research Council Overview This paper follows on from the associated essay, “Sudan: What Kind of State? What Kind of Crisis?”1 which concluded that the two dominant characteristics of the Sudanese state are (a) the extreme economic and political inequality between a hyper-dominant centre and peripheries that are weak and fragmented and (b) the failure of any single group or faction within the centre to exercise effective control over the institutions of the state, but who nonetheless can collectively stay in power because of their disproportionate resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement
    Accord 18_43 13/12/06 13:32 Page 32 A summary of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement Machakos Protocol (2002) Power Sharing (2004) Wealth Sharing (2004) A six-year interim period [dated from Sudan will have both a national A National Land Commission, 9 July 2005] is established during government with representation from Southern Sudan Land Commission which the southern Sudanese will both sides of the north-south conflict, and state land commissions are to be have the right to govern affairs in their and a separate Government of established. A National Petroleum region and participate equitably in Southern Sudan (GoSS). The Southern Commission is to be established to the national government. Sudan Constitution and state manage petroleum resources. constitution must comply with the Peace implementation is to be 2% of oil revenue will go to oil- Interim National Constitution. conducted in ways that make the producing states in southern Sudan unity of Sudan attractive. A Government of National Unity is in proportion to their output. The to be formed. There shall be a remaining net revenue will be divided After the interim period, southern decentralized system of government, evenly with 50% allocated to the GoSS Sudan will have the right to vote in an granting more power to individual and 50% allocated to the national internationally monitored referendum states. government. The GoSS has no power either to confirm Sudan’s unity or vote to negotiate any of the oil leases for secession. Positions in the state governments are granted by the national government to be split 70:30 in favour of the NCP Shari’a law is to remain applicable in prior to the CPA.
    [Show full text]
  • ABYEI CASE STUDY Improving Livelihoods, Social Peace and Stability in Abyei
    EVALUATION IN HARD TO REACH AREAS Conflict Sensitivity: A criterion for evaluations in the contexts of violent conflicts ABYEI CASE STUDY Improving Livelihoods, Social Peace and Stability in Abyei Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Brussels, 17 May 2019 [email protected] Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Abyei Map [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Conflicts resulting from different types of tenure FAO, 2016. Land and people in protracted crises [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Conflicts resulting from different types of tenure [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Conflicts resulting from different types of tenure [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Conflicts resulting from different types of tenure [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Project intervention strategy Three Pillars I. Assessing the natural resources to promote its efficient utilization and future development II. Promoting dialogue, confidence and peacebuilding
    [Show full text]