DOCSLIB.ORG

IRMA API and Data Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IRMA API and Data Services National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF CHIRICAHUA NATIONAL MONUMENT AND FORT BOWIE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE National Park Service Task Agreement J1233040013 ON THE COVER Naiche and Geronimo at Fort Bowie, 1886 Photograph Courtesy of the Mescalero Apache Tribe ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF CHIRICAHUA NATIONAL MONUMENT AND FORT BOWIE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE National Park Service Task Agreement J1233040013 Scott Rushforth, Ph.D. Department of Anthropology New Mexico State University Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003 July 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Intermountain Support Office Denver, Colorado 80225 The National Park Service publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from: David Ruppert National Park Service Intermountain Support Office Denver, Colorado 80225 Please cite this publication as: Rushforth, Scott. 2010. Ethnographic Overview and Assessment of Chiricahua National Monument and Fort Bowie National Historic Site. National Park Service Task Agreement J1233040013. National Park Service, Denver, Colorado. J1233040013, July 2010 ii Contents Page Figures ......................................................................................................................................... ivv Tables .......................................................................................................................................... vvi Appendices ................................................................................................................................ vivii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction, by Scott Rushforth................................................................................................... 3 Chapter One. Treaties and Legal Obligations between the U. S. Government and the Chiricahua Apaches, by Mark Sechrist and Craig Williams .......................................................... 9 Chapter Two. An Overview of Previous Archaeological Work at Chiricahua National Monument and Fort Bowie National Historic Site, by Mark Sechrist .......................................... 25 Chapter Three. Archaeology Project Descriptions at Chiricahua National Monument and Fort Bowie National Historic Site, by Mark Sechrist ................................................................... 47 Chapter Four. Chiricahua Apache Historical Timeline, by Scott Rushforth .............................. 73 Chapter Five. A Brief Military History of the Chiricahua Apaches, by Rick Hendricks and Becki A. R. Graham ............................................................................................................. 219 Chapter Six. The Chiricahua Apache Mode of Production, by Becki A. R. Graham and Scott Rushforth ........................................................................................................................... 251 Chapter Seven. A Southern Athapaskan Ethnobotany, by Aaron Sharratt and Scott Rushforth ........................................................................................................................... 279 Chapter Eight. A Partially Annotated Bibliography of Chiricahua and other Apaches, by Scott Rushforth, Aaron Sharratt, and Becki A. R. Graham ................................................... 397 iii Figures Page Figure 1. Apache Peoples of the Southwest ................................................................................... 7 Figure 2. Chiricahua Indian Reservation Detail, Territory of Arizona, 1876 ................................ 8 Figure 3. Chiricahua Reservation 1872-1876 .............................................................................. 12 Figure 4. Example of Project Summary Entry ............................................................................. 26 Figure 5. Spanish Dominions of North America, 1812 ............................................................. 233 Figure 6. Chiricahua Mountains Detail from Spanish Dominions of North America, 1812 ..... 234 Figure 7. Map of the United States of Mexico, 1846 ................................................................. 236 Figure 8. Chiricahua Mountains Detail from Map of the United States of Mexico, 1846 ........ 236 Figure 9. Chiricahua Mountains Detail from Official Map of the Territory of Arizona, 1865 . 245 Figure 10. Detail of Railroad & Steamship Lines Operated by Southern Pacific Company, 1884............................................................................................................................................. 250 Figure 11. Warm Springs Apache Family ................................................................................. 252 Figure 12. Warm Springs Apache Camp ................................................................................... 253 Figure 13. Deer Head Mask ....................................................................................................... 257 Figure 14. Chiricahua Apache Bands ........................................................................................ 273 Figure 15. Agave parryi ............................................................................................................. 280 Figure 16. Allium geyeri ............................................................................................................. 291 Figure 17. Asclepias latifolia ..................................................................................................... 294 Figure 18. Carnegiea gigantea .................................................................................................. 297 Figure 19. Chenopodium album ................................................................................................. 302 Figure 20. Cirsium undulatum ................................................................................................... 304 Figure 21. Cucurbita foetidissima .............................................................................................. 308 Figure 22. Echinocereus coccineus ............................................................................................ 317 iv Figure 23. Frasera speciosa ....................................................................................................... 318 Figure 24. Juniperus osteosperma ............................................................................................. 324 Figure 25. Larrea tridentata ...................................................................................................... 328 Figure 26. Nicotiana trigonophylla ............................................................................................ 330 Figure 27. Nolina microcarpa .................................................................................................... 334 Figure 28. Oenothera albicaulis ................................................................................................ 336 Figure 29. Opuntia ..................................................................................................................... 337 Figure 30. Penstemon fendleri ................................................................................................... 341 Figure 31. Populus tremuloides ................................................................................................. 352 Figure 32. Probowscidea parviflora .......................................................................................... 354 Figure 33. Prosopis glanulosa ................................................................................................... 356 Figure 34. Quercus arizonica ..................................................................................................... 361 Figure 35. Rhus glabra ............................................................................................................... 366 Figure 36. Ribes leptanthum ...................................................................................................... 369 Figure 37. Robiniia neomexicana .............................................................................................. 371 Figure 38. Rumex humenosepalus .............................................................................................. 372 Figure 39. Solanum elaeagnifolium ........................................................................................... 374 Figure 40. Yucca elata ............................................................................................................... 379 v Tables Page Table 1. Summary of Archaeological Projects at Fort Bowie National Historic Site .................. 26 Table 2. Summary of Archaeological Projects at Chiricahua National Monument ..................... 35 Table 3. Chirichua Apache Historical Timeline ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chiricahuas Present a Verdant, Forested Island in a Sea of Desert
    Rising steeply from the dry grasslands of southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico, the Chiricahuas present a verdant, forested island in a sea of desert. Many species of trees, shrubs, and flowering herbs clothe steep canyon walls. Shady glens, alive with birds, are sheltered by rows of strange massive spires, turrets, and battlements in this fascinating wonderland of rocks. Story of the rocks-What geological forces created these striking and peculiar pinnacles and balanced rocks? Geolo- gists explain that millions of years ago volcanic activity was extensive throughout this region. A series of explosive eruptions, alternating with periods of inactivity, covered the area with layers of white-hot volcanic ash that welded into rock. Because the eruptions varied in magnitude, the deposits were of different thicknesses. Finally, the eruptions ceased, followed by movements in the earth's crust which slowly lifted and tilted great rock masses to form mountains. The stresses responsible for the movements caused a definite pattern of cracks. Along the vertical cracks and planes of horizontal weakness, ero- sion by weathering and running water began its persistent work. Cracks were widened to form fissures; and fissures grew to breaches. At the same time, under-cutting slowly took place. Gradually the lava masses were cut by millions of ero- sional channels into blocks of myriad sizes and shapes, to be further sculptured by the elements. Shallow canyons became deeper and more rugged as time passed. Weathered rock formed soil, which collected in pockets; and plants thus gained a foothold. Erosion is still going on slowly and persistently among the great pillared cliffs of the monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Afternoon Kara, Is the Carmen Court Designation Review Still Open
    From: Leo Cruz To: Hahn, Kara L. - CPD City Planner Principal Subject: [EXTERNAL] 900 E. 1st Avenue Date: Friday, July 17, 2020 5:10:28 PM Good afternoon Kara, Is the Carmen Court Designation review still open for public input? If so, I would like to state my support for the landmark consideration as stated in the application. In particular, I strongly concur with the assessments of criteria 6, 7 and 3 as detailed in the application. Please let me know if there is a process or format I need to follow to formalize my expression of support. Thank you! Leo Cruz 48 S. Pearl Street 720-219-3091 Karen Roehl, 90 Emerson Street, Carmen Court, Denver CO I was born in Montreal, Canada where I spent my childhood. In 1967 when I was 12, my family immigrated to Denver. I married and had 2 children by the time I was 24. The marriage didn’t work out, and I became a single parent. Working full time as a secretary while taking evening classes in graphic design made me a very busy mother! Eventually, I was able to shift careers and become a graphic designer. I had a great career for over 25 years. After my daughters went off to college, I began to pursue fine art painting. At age 50, I decided to go back to school to earn my BFA, my first higher ed de- gree. Graduating in 2007, I immediately found representation for my work and have made a living as an artist ever since. I sell my work through gallery representation and various shows.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Changes of the Gila River in Safford Valley, Arizona 1846-1970
    Channel Changes of the Gila River in Safford Valley, Arizona 1846-1970 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 655-G Channel Changes of the Gila River in Safford Valley, Arizona 1846-1970 By D. E. BURKHAM GILA RIVER PHREATOPHYTE PROJECT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 655-G UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 2401-2065 CONTENTS Page Abstract.__________________________________________ Gl Flood-plain reconstruction, 1918-70_-______-__--_--___ G12 Introduction.___--_____-----_-__________-_-______-_ 1 Sediment inflow._________--_-______---____---__ 12 Development process____________________________ 13 Characteristics of the study reach___-_-_________---___ 3 Stream-channel development _________________ 13 Data sources. ______________________________________ 4 Alluvial-fan development-___________________ 14 Gila River before 1875__--- ---_-----------_-----_ 4 Rates of sediment accretion._____________________ 15 Gila River from 1875 to 1970 ____-__--___.-_-_-_-__-_ 5 Influence of wide flood channel and low-flow Stream-channel widening, 1905-17-___________________ 7 rates.___-_-___--___-------__----------_- 19 Influence of stream-channel treatment practices Factors and mechanics involved._-_--_____-__-__- 7 and flood-plain vegetation.________________ 19 Major floods and grazing-___________________ 7 Influence of flood-plain cultivation.___________ 21 Flood-plain vegetation and cultivation _________ Changes in stream-channel length and slope._______ 21 Hydrologic implications.____________________________ 22 Effects of stream-channel widening on stream Summary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wrath of Cochise: the Bascom Affair and the Origins of the Apache Wars Free Ebook
    FREETHE WRATH OF COCHISE: THE BASCOM AFFAIR AND THE ORIGINS OF THE APACHE WARS EBOOK Terry Mort | 352 pages | 17 Apr 2014 | Little, Brown Book Group | 9781472110923 | English | London, United Kingdom Review: 'The Wrath of Cochise: The Bascom Affair and the Origins of the Apache Wars,' by Terry Mort The Wrath of Cochise: The Bascom Affair and the Origins of the Apache Wars (English Edition) eBook: Mort, Terry, : Kindle Store. Bascom Affair Main article: Bascom Affair Open war with the Chiricahua Apaches had begun in , when Cochise, one of their chiefs, was accused by the Army of kidnapping an year-old Mexican boy, Felix Ward, stepson of Johnny Ward, later known as Mickey Free. The Bascom Massacre was a confrontation between Apache Indians and the United States Army under Lt. George Nicholas Bascom in the Arizona Territory in early It has been considered to have directly precipitated the decades-long Apache Wars between the United States and several tribes in the southwestern United States. Bascom affair Get this from a library! The wrath of Cochise: [the Bascom affair and the origins of the Apache wars]. [T A Mort] -- In February , the twelve- year-old son of Arizona rancher John Ward was kidnapped by Apaches. Ward followed their trail and reported the incident to patrols at Fort Buchanan, blaming a band of. The tale starts off in with Apaches attacking the John Ward ranch in the Sonoita Valley in Southern Arizona. Ward goes to Fort Buchanan to complain. The Army sends 2nd Lt. George Bascom and a patrol out to find the perpetrators.
    [Show full text]
  • By Douglas P. Klein with Plates by G.A. Abrams and P.L. Hill U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado
    U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STRUCTURE OF THE BASINS AND RANGES, SOUTHWEST NEW MEXICO, AN INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTIONS by Douglas P. Klein with plates by G.A. Abrams and P.L. Hill U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado Open-file Report 95-506 1995 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. The use of trade, product, or firm names in this papers is for descriptive purposes only, and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. STRUCTURE OF THE BASINS AND RANGES, SOUTHWEST NEW MEXICO, AN INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTIONS by Douglas P. Klein CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 DEEP SEISMIC CRUSTAL STUDIES .................................. 4 SEISMIC REFRACTION DATA ....................................... 7 RELIABILITY OF VELOCITY STRUCTURE ............................. 9 CHARACTER OF THE SEISMIC VELOCITY SECTION ..................... 13 DRILL HOLE DATA ............................................... 16 BASIN DEPOSITS AND BEDROCK STRUCTURE .......................... 20 Line 1 - Playas Valley ................................... 21 Cowboy Rim caldera .................................. 23 Valley floor ........................................ 24 Line 2 - San Luis Valley through the Alamo Hueco Mountains ....................................... 25 San Luis Valley ..................................... 26 San Luis and Whitewater Mountains ................... 26 Southern
    [Show full text]
  • AL SIEBER, FAMOUS SCOUT of the SOUTHWEST (By DAN R
    Al Sieber, Famous Scout Item Type text; Article Authors Williamson, Dan R. Publisher Arizona State Historian (Phoenix, AZ) Journal Arizona Historical Review Rights This content is in the public domain. Download date 29/09/2021 08:22:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623491 60 ARIZONA HISTORICAL REVIEW AL SIEBER, FAMOUS SCOUT OF THE SOUTHWEST (By DAN R. WILLIAMSON) Albert Sieber was born in the Grand Dutchy of Baden, Ger- many, February 29, '1844, and died near Roosevelt, Arizona, February 19, 1907. Came to America with his parents as a small boy, settling for a time in Pennsylvania, then moved to Minnesota. Early in 1862 Sieber enlisted in Company B, First Minne- sota Volunteer Infantry, serving through the strenuous Penin- sula campaign of the Army of the Potomac as a corporal and a sharp-shooter. On July 2, 1863, on Gettysburg Battlefield, he was dangerously wounded in the head by a piece of shell, and while lying helpless and unattended on the field of battle a bul- let entered his right ankle and followed up the leg, coming out at the knee. He lay in the hospital until December, 1863, when he was transferred to the First Regiment of Veteran Reserves as a corporal, under Captain Morrison, and his regiment was ac- credited to the State of Massachusetts. When Sieber fell wound- ed on the field of Gettysburg, General Hancock, who was near him, was wounded at the same time. For Sieber 's service with this regiment the State of Massachusetts paid him the sum of $300 bounty.
    [Show full text]
  • RED000953.Pdf
    IDENTIFICACION Y RECONSTRUCCION DE LA RED DE APOYO A JOSE URREA EN SONORA DURANTE SU CONFLICTO ARMADO CON MANUEL MARIA GANDARA 1837-1845 Tesis que para obtener el grado de Maestro en Ciencias Sociales Línea de investigación: Estudios Históricos de Región y Frontera Presenta Ivan Aarón Torres Chon Directora de Tesis: Dra. Zulema Trejo Contreras Hermosillo, Sonora Febrero del 2011 INTRODUCCION I Planteamiento del problema III CAPITULO I. El SISTEMA DE GOBIERNO FEDERAL. I.1. Balance historiográfico sobre la pugna entre gobierno federalista y centralista. 1 I.2. El pronunciamiento por el federalismo-centralismo en la frontera norte. 5 I.3. José Urrea en la historiografía sonorense. 7 CAPITULO II. ANALISIS DE RED SOCIAL II.1. Análisis de redes en sociología, antropología e historia. 14 II.2 Marco Teórico referencial. 26 CAPITULO III. SONORA EN LA PRIMERA MITAD DEL SIGLO XIX. III.1.Descripción geográfica de Sonora en las décadas de 1830 y 1840. 34 III.2 Principales poblaciones sonorenses. 37 III.2.1 Población general de Sonora. 42 III.2.1.1 Arizpe. 43 III.2.1.2 Horcasitas y Ures. 44 III.2.1.3 Hermosillo. 45 III.2.1.4 Álamos. 46 III.3 Tribus y asentamientos indígenas. 46 III.3.1 Incursiones Apache y sublevaciones indígenas en Sonora. 52 III.4 El intercambio comercial en Sonora en la década de 1830. 54 III.4.1 Agricultura. 55 III.4.2 Ganadería. 56 III.4.3 Minería. 57 III.5 Sistema de gobierno Nacional. 59 III.5.1 Grupos representativos de la política regional. 62 III.5.2 Participación de los militares en la administración estatal.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Overview, Fort Bowie National Historic Site, Arizona
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. Foundation Document Overview. Fort Bowie National Historic Site. Arizona. Contact Information. For more information about the Fort Bowie National Historic Site Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or (520) 847-2500 or write to: Superintendent, Fort Bowie National Historic Site, 3327 Old Fort Bowie Road, Bowie, AZ 85605 Purpose. Significance. Significance statements express why Fort Bowie National Historic Site resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, research, and consensus. Significance statements describe the distinctive nature of the park and inform management decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. • For over 25 years Fort Bowie was central to late 19th-century US military campaign against the Chiricahua Apaches. The final surrender by Geronimo in 1886 to troops stationed at Fort Bowie brought an end to two centuries of Apache warfare with the Spanish, Mexicans, and Americans in southeast Arizona. • Designated a national historic landmark in 1960, Fort Bowie National Historic Site preserves the remnants of the fort structures that are key to understanding the history FORT BOWIE NATIONAL HISTORIC of Apache Pass and the US military presence there, which SITE preserves and interprets the ultimately opened the region to unrestricted settlement. history, landscape, and remaining • Apache Pass offers the most direct, accessible route between structures of Fort Bowie, a US Army the Chiricahua and Dos Cabezas ranges, with a reliable outpost which guarded the strategic water supply available from Apache Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Army Scouts: the Southwestern
    3-/71 UNITED STATES ARMY SCOUTS: THE SOUTHWESTERN EXPERIENCE, 1866-1890 THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Carol Conley Nance, B. A. Denton, Texas May, 1975 Nance, Carol Conley, United States Army Scouts: The Southwestern Experience, 1866-1890. Master of Arts (History), May, 1975, 156 pp., 4 maps, bibliography, 107 titles. In the post-Civil War Southwest, the United States Army utilized civilians and Indians as scouts. As the mainstay of the reconnaissance force, enlisted Indians excelled as trackers, guides, and fighters. General George Crook became the foremost advocate of this service. A little-known aspect of the era was the international controversy created by the activities of native trackers under the 1882 recipro- cal hot pursuit agreement between Mexico and the United States. Providing valuable information on Army scouts are numerous government records which include the Annual Report of the Secretary of War from 1866 to 1896 and Foreign Relations of the United States for 1883 and 1886. Memoirs, biographies, and articles in regional and national histori- cal journals supplement government documents. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF MAPS . iv Chapter I. THE SOUTHWEST: CONVENTIONAL ARMY, UNCONVENTIONAL ENEMY 17 II. ARMY SCOUTS: CIVILIANS ON THE TRAIL . 2.17 III. ARMY SCOUTS: SET AN INDIAN TO CATCH AN INDIAN ..................... - - - - 28 IV. GENERAL GEORGE CROOK: UNCONVENTIONAL SOLDIER ........................ - -0 -0 -0 .0 68 V. INDIAN SCOUTS: AN INTERNATIONAL CONTROVERSY .......... *........ .100 VI. ARMY SCOUTS: SOME OBSERVATIONS .. o. 142 BIBLIOGRAPHY, . ...........-.-.-. .148 iii LIST OF MAPS Map Following Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Us Geological Survey Ground-Water
    SUMMARY OF U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GROUND-WATER- FLOW MODELS OF BASIN-FILL AQUIFERS IN THE SOUTHWESTERN ALLUVIAL BASINS REGION, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, AND TEXAS By John Michael Kernodle U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 90-361 Albuquerque, New Mexico 1992 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL |SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, E'irector For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division Books and Open-File Reports Pinetree Office Park Federal Center 4501 Indian School Rd. NE, Suite 200 Box 25425 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 Denver, Colorado 80225 Foreword The Regional Aquifer-System Analysis Program The Regional Aquifer-System Analysis (RASA) program was started in 1978 after a congressional mandate to develop quantitative appraisals of the major ground-water systems of the United States. The RASA program represents a systematic effort to study a number of the Nation's most important aquifer systems that, in aggregate, underlie much of the country and that represent important components of the Nation's total water supply. In general, the boundaries of these studies are identified by the hydrologic extent of each system, and accordingly transcend the political subdivisions to which investigations have often arbitrarily been limited in the past. The broad objective for each study is to assemble geologic, hydrologic, and geochemical information, to analyze and develop an understanding of the system, and to develop predictive capabilities that will contribute to the effective management of the system. The use of computer simulation is an important element of the RASA studies, both to develop an understanding of the natural, undisturbed hydrologic system and any changes brought about by human activities as well as to provide a means of predicting the regional effects of future pumping or other stresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Geologic Structures Between Lordsburg, New Mexico, and Tucson, Arizona Harald D
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/29 Major geologic structures between Lordsburg, New Mexico, and Tucson, Arizona Harald D. Drewes and C. H. Thorman, 1978, pp. 291-295 in: Land of Cochise (Southeastern Arizona), Callender, J. F.; Wilt, J.; Clemons, R. E.; James, H. L.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 29th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 348 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1978 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain's Arizona Patriots in Its 1779-1783 War
    W SPAINS A RIZ ONA PA TRIOTS J • in its 1779-1783 WARwith ENGLAND During the AMERICAN Revolutuion ThirdStudy of t he SPANISH B ORDERLA NDS 6y Granvil~ W. andN. C. Hough ~~~i~!~~¸~i ~i~,~'~,~'~~'~-~,:~- ~.'~, ~ ~~.i~ !~ :,~.x~: ~S..~I~. :~ ~-~;'~,-~. ~,,~ ~!.~,~~~-~'~'~ ~'~: . Illl ........ " ..... !'~ ~,~'] ." ' . ,~i' v- ,.:~, : ,r~,~ !,1.. i ~1' • ." ~' ' i;? ~ .~;",:I ..... :"" ii; '~.~;.',',~" ,.', i': • V,' ~ .',(;.,,,I ! © Copyright 1999 ,,'~ ;~: ~.~:! [t~::"~ "~, I i by i~',~"::,~I~,!t'.':'~t Granville W. and N.C. Hough 3438 Bahia blanca West, Aprt B Laguna Hills, CA 92653-2830 k ,/ Published by: SHHAR PRESS Society of Hispanic Historical and Ancestral Research P.O. Box 490 Midway City, CA 92655-0490 http://mcmbers.aol.com/shhar SHHARPres~aol.com (714) $94-8161 ~I,'.~: Online newsletter: http://www.somosprimos.com ~" I -'[!, ::' I ~ """ ~';I,I~Y, .4 ~ "~, . "~ ! ;..~. '~/,,~e~:.~.=~ ........ =,, ;,~ ~c,z;YA':~-~A:~.-"':-'~'.-~,,-~ -~- ...... .:~ .:-,. ~. ,. .... ~ .................. PREFACE In 1996, the authors became aware that neither the NSDAR (National Society for the Daughters of the American Revolution) nor the NSSAR (National Society for the Sons of the American Revolution) would accept descendants of Spanish citizens of California who had donated funds to defray expenses ,-4 the 1779-1783 war with England. As the patriots being turned down as suitable ancestors were also soldiers,the obvious question became: "Why base your membership application on a money contribution when the ancestor soldier had put his life at stake?" This led to a study of how the Spanish Army and Navy had worked during the war to defeat the English and thereby support the fledgling English colonies in their War for Independence. After a year of study, the results were presented to the NSSAR; and that organization in March, 1998, began accepting descendants of Spanish soldiers who had served in California.
    [Show full text]