DOCSLIB.ORG

Feminist Hci for Real: Designing Technology in Support of a Social Movement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feminist Hci for Real: Designing Technology in Support of a Social Movement FEMINIST HCI FOR REAL: DESIGNING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF A SOCIAL MOVEMENT ADissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Jill P. Dimond In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Human-Centered Computing in the School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology December 2012 FEMINIST HCI FOR REAL: DESIGNING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF A SOCIAL MOVEMENT Approved by: Professor Amy Bruckman, Advisor Professor Elizabeth Mynatt School of Interactive Computing School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Wenda Bauschspies Professor Shaowen Bardzell School of History, Sciences, and School of Informatics and Computing Technology Indiana University Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Eric Gilbert Date Approved: 14 August 2012 School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology For the Hollaback activists and for those working to stop street harassment. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There have been many people who have supported me in this journey—admittedly, it takes a community to raise a doctoral graduate. First, I would like to thank everyone from Hollaback. To Emily May for her tenac- ity, wisdom, friendship, and also for her openness to participate in this work—thank you for all that you do. To Inti Maria Tidball-Binz, Lauren Alston, Crystal Rodgers, and Daphne LaRose—I admire your strength, acumen, and judgement. Thank you all for reading drafts of my chapters and putting yourself out there so that this work can help us all to grow. I would also like to thank Veronica Pinto for her hard work in growing the Hollaback community. Thank you to Alex Alston and Amalia Rose for helping me conduct and transcribe the interviews. To all of the other Hollaback site leaders, thank you for participating in this work and for taking a stand in your community, I continue to be blown away by all the amazing work that you do. Next, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Amy Bruckman and my committee. To Amy for believing in me and the work I wanted to pursue—thank you for taking ariskinme.ToDrs.BethMynattandEricGilbert,thankyoufortakingthis work seriously, supporting me, and providing invaluable feedback. To Dr. Wenda Bauschspies for being my mentor and friend, and supporting me when I wanted to quit. To Shaowen Bardzell for blazing paths in feminism and HCI that helped legitimize and position this work. I would also like to thank the NSF for giving me the freedom to pursue research that would otherwise be almost impossible to fund. To my academic siblings in the ELC lab: Betsy DiSalvo, Sarita Yardi, Kurt Luther, and Casey Fiesler, thank you for sitting through practice presentations, read- ing drafts, chatting in the lab, and drinking beers with me—I couldn’t have asked for iv abetterlab.TotheotherPh.Dstudentsandfaculty,LanaYarosh,EugeneMedinsky, Evan Barba, Chris LeDantec, Carrie Bruce, especially the Proposal Solidarity group including Andrew Miller, Kim Weaver, Brian O’Neill, and T.J. Yun, thank you for your feedback and support. To my first home at Georgia Tech, the CSL lab, including Dr. Mark Guzdial, Dr. Brian Dorn, Dr. Allison Tew, Michael Hewner, and Dr. Lijun Ni, thank you for your support. To my collaborator Michaelanne Dye, thank you for your insights and work on the storytelling chapter. Thank you to my friends outside of academia who provided much-needed perspec- tives and distractions outside of academic life including Amy Cobden, Leah Kokinakis, Jane Middleton, Kelli Zerbel, Marissa Yurko, Anne Phillips, Molly Barba, Meg Hope- man, Laura Lashley, Amanda Lang-Maher, Renata Le Dantec, my Reynoldstown neighbors, my friends at All Life is Yoga, the Sugar Creek Community garden, and Kelli’s Radical Childcare Collective—I love you all. To my parents Diane Ebaugh and Mike Dimond, thank you for all your support and love in this process. To my brother, Dan Dimond thank you for always listening to me. To my new family, James Smyth and Maxine White, thank you for your support. I also need to thank my dog, Dewey, for providing much needed walk breaks and for lying at my feet while I wrote. Finally, to my partner in life, Tom Smyth. Thank you for your love and for growing with me in this journey. You always believed in me. v TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION .................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................... xi LIST OF FIGURES .............................. xii LIST OF SYMBOLS OR ABBREVIATIONS .............. xiii SUMMARY .................................... xiv 1INTRODUCTION............................. 1 1.1 Hollaback! AMovementtoEndStreetHarassment . 2 1.2 Researcher Positionality . 4 1.3 Research Framing . 5 1.3.1 RQ 1: What is the relationship between the Hollaback orga- nizationandthetechnology? . 6 1.3.2 RQ 2: What technological tactics do activists use in social media? . 6 1.3.3 RQ 3: What is the role of storytelling using technology in a socialmovementorganization? . 6 1.3.4 RQ 4: What are the opportunities and challenges for doing action research in a social movement organization as a tech- nology developer? . 6 1.4 Overview of Dissertation . 7 1.5 Contributions .............................. 7 2RELATEDWORK............................. 9 2.1 StreetHarassment............................ 9 2.1.1 TheoriesofStreetHarassment . 10 2.1.2 ImpactofStreetHarassment . 11 2.2 Feminism,Activism,andICTs . 11 2.2.1 CyberfeminismandFeminismOnline . 12 vi 2.2.2 Feminism and Design . 13 2.3 Non-Profit,Community,andServiceDesign . 13 2.4 ICTs and Social Movements . 14 2.4.1 Mobilizing Structures . 15 2.4.2 OpportunityStructures . 16 2.4.3 Framing Processes . 17 3METHODS................................. 19 3.1 Theoretical Reflection . 20 3.2 OverviewofActionResearch . 22 3.2.1 Scientific-Technical . 23 3.2.2 Practical/Pragmatic . 24 3.2.3 Emancipatory . 24 3.2.4 Spectrum of Researcher Participation . 25 3.3 Overview of Methods . 26 3.3.1 Design Methods . 26 3.3.2 Qualitative Methods . 28 3.3.3 QuantitativeAnalysisofSocialMediaData . 30 3.4 Researcher Self-Disclosure . 30 4 BUILDING AN INTERNATIONAL FEMINIST COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE ............................... 32 4.1 Methods . 33 4.1.1 Data Collection . 33 4.1.2 DataAnalysis .......................... 34 4.2 HistoryofHollaback........................... 35 4.2.1 My Involvement . 36 4.3 HollabackOrganizationalModel . 38 4.3.1 StatisticsofUsage........................ 40 4.4 FosteringCommunityandAccountability . 42 4.4.1 TheLaunchProcessandNewcomers. 42 vii 4.4.2 Building Strong Ties and Community Online . 46 4.4.3 CreatingArtifactsTogether. 48 4.4.4 Slutwalks . 49 4.5 Site Leaders . 50 4.5.1 Getting Support . 50 4.6 Sources of Contention . 52 4.6.1 AnonymousParticipation . 54 4.6.2 NonParticipation ........................ 54 4.7 Technology Description . 55 4.7.1 Apps ............................... 55 4.7.2 LocalHollabackImplementation . 58 4.7.3 Internal Tools and Social Media . 59 4.8 Case Studies . 60 4.8.1 BuenosAires........................... 60 4.8.2 Atlanta . 66 4.8.3 Edmonton,Alberta ....................... 71 4.9 Discussion . 72 4.9.1 ToolsandtheSubject: ActivismasHobby . 74 4.9.2 Tools, Rules, and Division of Labor: A Tension Between De- centralization and Sustainability . 76 4.9.3 ToolsandtheCreationofCommunity . 79 4.10 Contribution . 81 5 TACTICAL SOCIAL MEDIA ...................... 83 5.1 SocialMediaUsage ........................... 84 5.2 Method . 88 5.3 Results . 89 5.4 Discussion . 93 5.4.1 The Role of Traditional Media . 94 5.4.2 OfflinePresenceandLocalAction . 98 viii 5.4.3 ConnectionstoOtherSocialNetworkSites . 98 5.5 Contribution............................... 99 6 THE ROLE OF STORYTELLING ONLINE IN A SOCIAL MOVE- MENT ORGANIZATION ........................ 101 6.1 Social Movement Framing . 102 6.2 Methods . 103 6.2.1 Data Collection . 103 6.2.2 DataAnalysis .......................... 104 6.3 Findings ................................. 104 6.3.1 Prior Structural Impediments . 104 6.3.2 Diagnosing a Problem and Frame Extension . 106 6.3.3 Frame Transformation . 107 6.3.4 HollabackasaNetworkedPublic. 110 6.3.5 Responding Back and Dealing . 112 6.3.6 UnpackingActivism. 113 6.3.7 Method of Sharing . 114 6.4 Discussion . 115 6.4.1 Crowd-Sourced Framing . 115 6.4.2 Concealed and Resistance Stories . 116 6.4.3 SafeSpacevsNetworkedPublic . 118 6.4.4 Methodological Considerations . 119 6.5 Contribution............................... 120 7 ACTION AND FEMINIST RESEARCH IN HCI ......... 121 7.1 FeministHCI............................... 122 7.1.1 Self-Disclosure . 122 7.1.2 Pluralism . 124 7.1.3 Advocacy............................. 125 7.1.4 Ecology . 126 7.1.5 Embodiment . 127 ix 7.1.6 Participation . 128 7.2 Emancipatory Action Research and Feminist HCI . 129 7.2.1 Opportunities .......................... 130 7.2.2 Challenges . 131 8 CONCLUSION ............................... 136 8.1 Research Questions . 136 8.1.1 RQ 1: What is the relationship between the Hollaback orga- nizationandthetechnology? . 136 8.1.2 RQ 2: What technological tactics do activists utilize in social media? . 138 8.1.3 RQ 3: What is the role of storytelling using technology in a socialmovementorganization? . 139 8.1.4 RQ 4: What are the opportunities and challenges for doing action research in a social movement organization as a tech- nology developer? . 140 8.2 Contributions .............................. 140 8.2.1 The Role of Storytelling Online for Social Justice . 141 8.2.2 TheHollabackCommunityandLocalSites . 141 8.2.3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gender-Inclusive HCI Research and Design: a Conceptual Review Full Text Available At
    Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000056 Gender-Inclusive HCI Research and Design: A Conceptual Review Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000056 Other titles in Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction Human-Food Interaction Rohit Ashok Khot and Florian Mueller ISBN: 978-1-68083-576-2 10 Lenses to Design Sports-HCI Florian Mueller and Damon Young ISBN: 978-1-68083-528-1 Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction Katie Shilton ISBN: 978-1-68083-466-6 Research Fiction and Thought Experiments in Design Mark Blythe and Enrique Encinas ISBN: 978-1-68083-418-5 Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000056 Gender-Inclusive HCI Research and Design: A Conceptual Review Simone Stumpf Daniela Busse City, University of London, UK Oracle, USA [email protected] [email protected] Anicia Peters Jessica Cauchard Namibia University of Ben Gurion University Science and Technology of the Negev Namibia Israel [email protected] [email protected] Shaowen Bardzell Elizabeth Churchill Indiana University, USA Google, USA [email protected] [email protected] Margaret Burnett Oregon State University, USA [email protected] Boston — Delft Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000056 Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction Published, sold and distributed by: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 1024 Hanover, MA 02339 United States Tel. +1-781-985-4510 www.nowpublishers.com [email protected] Outside North America: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 179 2600 AD Delft The Netherlands Tel. +31-6-51115274 The preferred citation for this publication is S.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review: Gender Research in Human Computer Interaction
    Review Literature Review: Gender Research in Human Computer Interaction Sabrina Burtscher November 2019 “This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 741128”. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Definitions: Gender .................................................................................................................................... 4 Definitions: Human Computer Interaction (HCI) ...................................................................................... 6 Gender and Design/Research: Pitfalls ........................................................................................................ 7 I-methodology: “Everyone is like me” .................................................................................................. 7 One Size Fits All: “Everyone is the same” ............................................................................................ 8 Gender Stereotyping: “All women are alike” ....................................................................................... 8 Gender difference: “Women are inherently different” .......................................................................... 9 Case Studies ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Content
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS KD Final
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Representing SlutWalk London in Mass and Social Media: Negotiating Feminist and Postfeminist Sensibilities Keren Darmon A thesis submitted to the Department of Media and Communications of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, June 2017 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 57,074 words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Ms. Jean Morris. 2 Epigraphs It has been a hostile climate for feminism: it didn’t thrive, but it didn’t die; it survives, it is nowhere and everywhere – and the phoenix is flying again. (Campbell, 2013, p. 4) As Prometheus stole fire from the gods, so feminists will have to steal the power of naming from men, hopefully to better effect. (Dworkin, 1981, p. 17) 3 Abstract When SlutWalk marched onto the protest scene, with its focus on ending victim blaming and slut shaming, it carried the promise of a renewed feminist politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Bias in Magazines Oriented to Men and Women: a Computational Approach
    Gender bias in magazines oriented to men and women: a computational approach Gender bias in magazines oriented to men and women: a computational approach Diego Kozlowski1, Gabriela Lozano2*, Carla M. Felcher3*, Fernando Gonzalez4, Edgar Altszyler5,6 1 Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg. (ORCID: 0000-0002-5396-3471). E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) 2 Interdisciplinary Institute of Gender Studies- University of Buenos Aires. 3 Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina 4 Maestría en Explotación de Datos y Descubrimiento del Conocimiento, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires.. 5 Departamento de Computación, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires. 6 Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación, CONICET-UBA, Argentina E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) * These authors contributed equally 1 Gender bias in magazines oriented to men and women: a computational approach Abstract Cultural products are a source to acquire individual values and behaviours. Therefore, the differences in the content of the magazines aimed specifically at women or men are a means to create and reproduce gender stereotypes. In this study, we compare the content of a women-oriented magazine with that of a men-oriented one, both produced by the same editorial group, over a decade (2008-2018). With Topic Modelling techniques we identify the main themes discussed in the magazines and quantify how much the presence of these topics differs between magazines over time. Then, we performed a word-frequency analysis to validate this methodology and extend the analysis to other subjects that did not emerge automatically.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTRUYENDO COMPLICADADES, RESPALDANDO RESISTENCIAS: a Roundtable Discussion on Institutional Violence in Latin American Universities
    Nuestro lugar de enunciación viene de otra historia, de otra genealogía; se trata de una intertextualidad que nos pertenece, tejida por las mujeres insolentes y pensantes y algunas otras rescatables que las circundan. Es un lugar conectado a la vida, a nuestra vida, a nuestros cuerpos históricos; consiste en una parcialidad honesta y pronunciada. —Andrea Franulic, “Un largo etcétera” My thinking grew directly out of listening to my own discomforts, finding out who shared them, who validated them, and in exchanging stories about common experiences, finding patterns, systems, explanations of how and why things happened. This is the central process of consciousness raising, of collective testimonio. This is how homemade theory happens. —Aurora Levins Morales, “Certified Organic Intellectual” CONSTRUYENDO COMPLICADADES, RESPALDANDO RESISTENCIAS: A Roundtable Discussion on Institutional Violence in Latin American Universities Natalia Thompson A few years ago, I had dinner in Mexico City with a Latina feminist from New York City. A Fulbright recipient, she had enrolled in two courses at the Programa Universitario de Estudios de Género (PUEG), one of the many institutes at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), but their Eurocentrism alienated her. She stopped attending. 322 CHICANA/LATINA STUDIES 13:2 SPRING 2014 CHICANA/LATINA STUDIES 13:2 SPRING 2014 323 CONSTRUYENDO COMPLICADADES, RESPALDANDO RESISTENCIAS Weeks later, I visited the PUEG’s extensive library, la Biblioteca Rosario Castellanos. Seeking a better understanding of decolonial Mexican feminist formations, I combed their shelves and their catalog, but came up empty- handed. While I found dozens of volumes by Judith Butler, Michel Foucault, and other queer theorists who “police the queer person of color with theory” through their use of “approaches, styles, and methodologies that are Anglo- American or European,” texts by Chicana and Latina feminists were notably scarce (Anzaldúa 2009, 165).
    [Show full text]
  • Pervasive Health 2013
    Pervasive Health 2013 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare Technical Programme San Servolo Island Venice, Italy 5th to 8th of May 2013 Conference at a glance Monday, May 6 Tuesday, May 7 Wednesday, May 8 8:00-8:45 REGISTRATION REGISTRATION 8:45-9:00 CONFERENCE OPENING ANNOUNCEMENT SESSION C (SHORT PAPERS) 9:00-10:00 KEYNOTE SPEAKER KEYNOTE SPEAKER From data capture to Elizabeth Mynatt Yvonne Rogers diagnosis 10:00-10:15 COFFEE BREAK SESSION 1 SESSION 4 SESSION 7 Gamification and Health professionals’ Self-monitoring 10:15-13:15 virtual environments needs technologies SESSION 2 SESSION 5 SESSION 8 Activity and behaviour Supporting patients’ Patients and care- evaluation needs givers. 13:15-14:15 LUNCH SESSION 3 SESSION 6 SESSION D (SHORT PAPERS) 14:15-15:45 Gait and exercise Sleep and Affect In-home monitoring evaluation monitoring SESSION E (SHORT PAPERS) Personal tracking and 15:45-16:00 COFFEE BREAK measurement SESSION A (SHORT PAPERS) 16:00 Posters and Demos 16:15 Townhall Meeting Therapy and 16:00 Doc. Colloquium Rehabilitation 17:00 Closing remarks 16:00-18:00 GALA DINNER SESSION B (SHORT PAPERS) End of Pervasive Health 2013 Supporting the elderly (20:00) Monday, May 6, 2013 OPENING | VENUE SALA TEATRO 8:45 – 9:00 9:00 – 10:00 KEYNOTE TALK SESSION CHAIR: TBD PERVASIVE HEALTH: EMPOWERING INDIVIDUALS, FACILITATING LEARNING AND DELIVERING BETTER HEALTH Elizabeth Mynatt Professor Executive Director, Institute for People and Technology Georgia Institute of Technology, USA While health is a pervasive human concern, healthcare is often siloed into acute care centers with misaligned incentives and fragmented care.
    [Show full text]
  • Slut-Shaming, Girl Power and 'Sexualisation'
    This article was downloaded by: [Institute of Education] On: 04 May 2012, At: 02:41 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Gender and Education Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cgee20 Slut-shaming, girl power and ‘sexualisation’: thinking through the politics of the international SlutWalks with teen girls Jessica Ringrose a & Emma Renold b a Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK b School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK Available online: 04 May 2012 To cite this article: Jessica Ringrose & Emma Renold (2012): Slut-shaming, girl power and ‘sexualisation’: thinking through the politics of the international SlutWalks with teen girls, Gender and Education, 24:3, 333-343 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.645023 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and- conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AMERICAN AI STRATEGY 16 September 2019
    INSIDERS DINNER: THE AMERICAN AI STRATEGY 16 September 2019 The American AI Initiative has – at least on the surface – made government agencies put artificial intelligence on the priorities radar in their immediate and extended work. Important challenges include: the lack of a centralized platform to “hold people together”; help form a suite of best practices; ensure agencies advance in a strategically aligned fashion; hiring top AI talent into government roles; and the broader need for AI education across agencies to debunk myths, facilitate feasibility assessments and troubleshoot. At the national level, the U.S. has to consider the urgency of the competition with other nations, particularly China, whose capacity to innovate is increasing. To stay competitive, there is a call for concrete goals from the White House to advance AI and for concrete funding to achieve these goals. Deeper public-private- academic collaboration is proposed for developing a responsible regulatory structure or enabling the vast troves of government data to serve the general public. As to the growing need for workers skilled in new technologies – is this achieved through incentivizing computer science studies, perhaps ensuring immigration policies allow American companies to brain gain global talent? On workforce and broader society questions, the balancing act between infusing technology into the national culture via “computational or algorithmic thinking” and orienting toward broader sociotechnological priorities is shifting. Introducing computer science foundational curriculum in K-12 education could increase technological accessibility across all socio-economic layers of our society – and so could gaming – but we need a clear path for converting that fundamental knowledge into economically productive applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Slut Pride: the Reappropriation Attempt by Slutwalk
    Quercus: Linfield Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 2 Article 3 2016 Slut Pride: The Reappropriation Attempt by SlutWalk Siena C. Noe Linfield College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/quercus Recommended Citation Noe, Siena C. (2016) "Slut Pride: The Reappropriation Attempt by SlutWalk," Quercus: Linfield Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/quercus/vol2/iss1/3 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It is brought to you for free via open access, courtesy of DigitalCommons@Linfield, with permission from the rights-holder(s). Your use of this Article must comply with the Terms of Use for material posted in DigitalCommons@Linfield, or with other stated terms (such as a Creative Commons license) indicated in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, or if you have questions about permitted uses, please contact [email protected]. Slut Pride: The Reappropriation Attempt by SlutWalk Acknowledgements Thanks to Brenda DeVore Marshall for her perpetual patience, guidance, and enthusiasm. This article is available in Quercus: Linfield Journal of Undergraduate Research: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/ quercus/vol2/iss1/3 Noe: Slut Pride SLUT PRIDE: THE REAPPROPRIATION ATTEMPT BY SLUTWALK A slew of scantily clad women marching through the streets shouting obscenities like “Slut, slut! Ho, ho! Yes means yes! No means no!” may seem a little unusual especially if the women are known to hold “respectable” positions and lead otherwise “respectable” lives. So what exactly is going on? The first SlutWalk took place in Toronto, Ontario, Canada in 2011, its idea conceived from feminist ideology and ignited by a comment made by Toronto Police officer, Constable Michael Sanguinetti.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design
    CHI 2010: HCI For All April 10–15, 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design Shaowen Bardzell Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing 919 E 10th Street, Rm 237, Bloomington, IN 47408 [email protected] ABSTRACT ing moral and intellectual complexity of our professional Feminism is a natural ally to interaction design, due to its activities. central commitments to issues such as agency, fulfillment, identity, equity, empowerment, and social justice. In this This topic is hardly new to computing: science and technol- paper, I summarize the state of the art of feminism in HCI ogy studies (STS) and social informatics have long empha- and propose ways to build on existing successes to more sized these sorts of issues. Yet when it comes to interaction robustly integrate feminism into interaction design research design—HCI proper—these concerns come up in a much and practice. I explore the productive role of feminism in more piecemeal and ad hoc way. For the purpose of this analogous fields, such as industrial design, architecture, and paper, I therefore confine my focus to the relationships be- game design. I introduce examples of feminist interaction tween feminism and interaction design (as opposed to design already in the field. Finally, I propose a set of femi- “computing” or “technology” more generally). nist interaction design qualities intended to support design Specifically, I am concerned with the design and evaluation and evaluation processes directly as they unfold. of interactive systems that are imbued with sensitivity to the Author Keywords central commitments of feminism—agency, fulfillment, HCI, Feminist HCI, feminism, design, feminist standpoint identity and the self, equity, empowerment, diversity, and theory, gender, interaction design, feminist design qualities social justice.
    [Show full text]
  • A Speculative Feminist Approach to Design Project Management
    A Speculative Feminist Approach to Design Project Management Milena Radzikowska a | Jennifer Roberts-Smith b | Xinyue Zhou c | Stan Ruecker d * a Mount Royal University: Calgary, AB, USA. b University of Waterloo: Waterloo, ON, Canada. c Sun Yat-Sen University /SYSU: Guangzhou, Guangdong,China. d University of Illinois: Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA * Corresponding authors: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper, we discuss how taking a speculative feminist approach, as proposed by some members of the human-computer interaction (HCI) community, results in a radically different design of software for project management. As we interpret it, speculative feminist design in HCI demonstrates attention to the following six principles: challenging the status quo; designing for an actionable ideal; searching out the invisible; considering the micro, meso, and macro; privileging transparency; and welcoming critique. In the context of project management, our approach to software design has therefore included the following priorities: all stakeholders have goals, but not necessarily shared goals; the line between an internal deliverable and an external project outcome is blurred; impacts can occur immediately or decades later; impact assessment methods need to be explicit in the project planning system. In adopting the terms speculative feminism and critical feminism, we intend that our work be understood as situated within the territory of Critical Theory as applied particularly to the work of the Frankfurt School. We introduce our design, called It’s a Wicked World (IWW), as an example, although it is only the current iteration of one part of a larger, ongoing project. Keywords: speculative feminist design, project management, human-computer interaction, wicked problems.
    [Show full text]
  • A National Research Agenda for Intelligent Infrastructure
    A National Research Agenda for Intelligent Infrastructure Elizabeth Mynatt Jennifer Clark Greg Hager Georgia Tech Georgia Tech Johns Hopkins University Computing Community Consortium Dan Lopresti Greg Morrisett Klara Nahrstedt Lehigh Univeristy Cornell University University of Illinois George Pappas Shwetak Patel Jennifer Rexford University of Pennsylvania University of Washington Princeton University Helen Wright Ben Zorn Computing Community Consortium Microsoft Research Our infrastructure touches the day-to-day life of each of our fellow citizens, and its capabilities, integrity and sustainability are crucial to the overall competitiveness and prosperity of our country. Unfortunately, the current state of U.S. infrastructure is not good: the American Society of Civil Engineers’ latest report on America’s infrastructure ranked it at a D+ — in need of $3.9 trillion in new investments. This dire situation constrains the growth of our economy, threatens our quality of life, and puts our global leadership at risk. The ASCE report called out three actions that need to be taken to address our infrastructure problem: 1) investment and planning in the system; 2) bold leadership by elected officials at the local and federal state; and 3) planning sustainability and resiliency in our infrastructure1. While our immediate infrastructure needs are critical, it would be shortsighted to simply replicate more of what we have today. By doing so, we miss the opportunity to create Intelligent Infrastructure that will provide the foundation for increased safety and resilience, improved efficiencies and civic services, and broader economic opportunities and job growth. Indeed, our challenge is to proactively engage the declining, incumbent national infrastructure system and not merely repair it, but to enhance it; to create an internationally competitive cyber-physical system that provides an immediate opportunity for better services for citizens and that acts as a platform for a 21st century, high-tech economy and beyond.
    [Show full text]