DOCSLIB.ORG

THE AMERICAN AI STRATEGY 16 September 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE AMERICAN AI STRATEGY 16 September 2019 INSIDERS DINNER: THE AMERICAN AI STRATEGY 16 September 2019 The American AI Initiative has – at least on the surface – made government agencies put artificial intelligence on the priorities radar in their immediate and extended work. Important challenges include: the lack of a centralized platform to “hold people together”; help form a suite of best practices; ensure agencies advance in a strategically aligned fashion; hiring top AI talent into government roles; and the broader need for AI education across agencies to debunk myths, facilitate feasibility assessments and troubleshoot. At the national level, the U.S. has to consider the urgency of the competition with other nations, particularly China, whose capacity to innovate is increasing. To stay competitive, there is a call for concrete goals from the White House to advance AI and for concrete funding to achieve these goals. Deeper public-private- academic collaboration is proposed for developing a responsible regulatory structure or enabling the vast troves of government data to serve the general public. As to the growing need for workers skilled in new technologies – is this achieved through incentivizing computer science studies, perhaps ensuring immigration policies allow American companies to brain gain global talent? On workforce and broader society questions, the balancing act between infusing technology into the national culture via “computational or algorithmic thinking” and orienting toward broader sociotechnological priorities is shifting. Introducing computer science foundational curriculum in K-12 education could increase technological accessibility across all socio-economic layers of our society – and so could gaming – but we need a clear path for converting that fundamental knowledge into economically productive applications. Participants Greg Allen, Chief of Strategy and Communications, Department of Defense Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) Bruce H. Andrews, Vice President of Global Public Policy, SoftBank* Carrie Budoff Brown, Editor, POLITICO Eric Engleman, Tech Editor, POLITICO Dr. Erwin Gianchandani, Deputy Assistant Director, Computer and Information Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation Dr. Nick Hart, CEO, Data Coalition Matt Kaminski, Editor-in-Chief, POLITICO Andrew Kim, Public Policy and Government Affairs, Google Cloud AI Dr. Dimitri Kusnezov, Deputy Undersecretary for A.I. and Technology, Department of Energy Thea Lee, Commissioner, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Damien Ma, Director of MacroPolo, The Paulson Institute Rep. Jerry McNerney, (D-CA), Co-Chair House AI Caucus Jackie Medecki, Director and Managing Attorney, U.S. AI and Healthcare Policy, Intel Corporation* Jason Oxman, JD, President and CEO, ITI Dr. Desmond Patton, Associate Professor, Columbia University School of Social Work Emily Reid, Vice President, Open Learning, AI4All David Ryan, General Manager, Health & Life Sciences Business, Intel Corporation Patrick Steel, CEO, POLITICO Christin Tinsworth Baker, Director of Public Affairs, SoftBank Group* Margaret Weichert, Deputy Director for Management, OMB, The White House David Wertime, Managing Director, Asia, Perpetual Capital Facilitator Stacey Pavesi, Editor, AI Summit, POLITICO ROUNDTABLE: THE IMMEDIATE IMPACT OF AI IN HEALTH CARE 17 September 2019 Of our two closed morning sessions, the group focused on “the immediate impact of AI in health care” started with near unanimous agreement that AI will create health care cost savings in the next 10 years. There was less unanimity about the path to such savings. It seems the utilization of AI in health care still varies greatly – more in clinical care management and ER or neurosurgical triage but another less in radiology. The group examined the potential for AI to serve as a predictive technology, “like indicator lights in your car,” to forecast health issues or disease development for early treatment. Among obstacles is the limitation of our capacity to respond meaning earlier flags may not be beneficial without sure paths for early treatment. Generalized AI-driven health care platforms or solutions aren’t likely in the near future without highly structured and well-managed international cooperation, particularly between developed and developing nations (the latter whose data is more likely to be underrepresented or unavailable in readily usable forms). What seems more likely is for AI to be developed and applied locally at first. Decision support by AI was also a key theme, generating discussion about the need for greater data reliability and sharing as well as standards, with a particular emphasis on “unified foundations” and user-centered design. However, there is still ongoing debate about who should own standard setting. In their absence, it seems the major gap between ideological vs practical, market-driven evolution of AI in health care will persist. Participants Dr. Gil Alterovitz, VA’s Director of AI, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Anthony Bak, Palantir Dr. Laura Coombs, Vice President, Data Science & Informatics, American College of Radiology Dr. Suraj Kapa, M.D., Cardiologist, Mayo Clinic Christopher Khoury, VP Strategy and Intelligence, American Medical Association Andrew Kim, Public Policy and Government Affairs, Google Cloud AI Dr. Dimitri Kusnezov, Deputy Undersecretary for A.I. and Technology, Department of Energy Jackie Medecki, Director and Managing Attorney, U.S. AI and Healthcare Policy, Intel Corporation* Emily Miller, Director, National Security & Critical Infrastructure Programs, Mocana Daniel J. Mollura, MD, President & CEO, RAD-AID Elizabeth Mynatt, Executive Director, People and Technology Institute; Professor, School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Tech David Ryan, General Manager, Health & Life Sciences Business, Intel Corporation* Elham Tabassi, Chief of Staff and the lead for NIST’s AI Research Program Moderators Joanne Kenen, Executive Editor, Health Care Arthur Allen, Editor, eHealth+Pharma ROUNDTABLE: THE FUTURE OF WORK 17 September 2019 In the concurrent roundtable on the future of work, the group examined AI adoption by businesses and the emergence of a real need for organizational and leadership transformation to ensure effective integration of the technology. As of yet, there is still no clear evidence that AI is boosting productivity, though it was noted that society should watch how AI plays out in businesses as a testing ground for broader societal applications and potential response. Polls and case studies reveal some surprising gaps between perception and response to AI as a work disruptor. Even if most people believe AI will eliminate “good” jobs, they also believe they are immune – perhaps because most people don’t know what skills will be needed as job markets shift. As for businesses, there is similar anxiety about change but relatively little investment in workforce preparedness. Policy changes – in education, worker protections, investments in human capital, infrastructure, data - were identified as a key tool in the transition to an AI-integrated labor market. Lifelong learning accounts, benefits portability and on-the-job training were all noted, as was the feasibility gap for small businesses. Education was not only discussed as a baseline for AI training across socioeconomic and cultural groups, it was also identified as an industry that can benefit from AI. There was a call for a national strategy for the future of work. National or continental models – both business and policy – are worth comparing, as the U.S., China and Europe look for the best ways to accept and include AI into their societies. Participants Bruce H. Andrews, Vice President of Global Public Policy, SoftBank* Christin Tinsworth Baker, Director of Public Affairs, SoftBank* Rep. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-AL) Jeffrey Brown, Future of Work and AI, Bertelsmann Foundation Dr. Grant Buckles, Research Consultant, Gallup Joy Dantong Ma, Associate Director of MacroPolo, The Paulson Institute Lisa Dyer, Head of Policy, Partnership on AI Nova Gattman, Deputy Director for External Affairs, Staff Coordinator, Health Workforce Council, Washington Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board Bret Greenstein, Vice President and Global Head of Artificial Intelligence, Cognizant Michael Lotito, Co-chair, Workplace Policy Institute, Littler; President, Emma Coalition Mark Muro, Senior Fellow and Policy Director, Brookings Lisa Neuberger-Fernandez, Managing Director Strategy + Innovation, Accenture Tom Ogletree, Director of Social Impact, General Assembly Emily Reid, Vice President, Open Learning, AI4ALL Perry Samson, Professor, Climate and Space Science, MIDAS, University of Michigan Susan Schneider, NASA-Blumberg Chair, Library of Congress; Director of the AI, Mind and Society Group, University of Connecticut Moderator Victoria Guida, Financial Services Reporter, POLITICO Pro .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WHTP-2009-06-National-Security-1.Pdf
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR Louis Fisher is Specialist in Constitutional Law with the Law Library of the Library of Congress. The views expressed here are personal, not institutional. Earlier in his career at the Library of Congress, Fisher worked for the Congressional Research Service from 1970 to March 3, 2006. During his service with CRS he was Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers and research director of the House Iran-Contra Committee in 1987, writing major sections of the final report. Fisher received his doctorate in political science from the New School for Social Research and has taught at a number of universities and law schools. He is the author of eighteen books, including In the Name of National Security: Unchecked Presidential Power and the Reynolds Case (2006), Presidential War Power (2d ed. 2004), Military Tribunals and Presidential Power (2005), The Politics of Executive Privilege (2004), American Constitutional Law (with Katy J. Harriger, 8th ed. 2009), Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the Presidency (5th ed. 2005), Nazi Saboteurs on Trial: A Military Tribunal and American Law (2003), and, most recently, The Constitution and 9/11: Recurring Threats to America’s Freedoms (2008). He has received four book awards. Fisher has been invited to testify before Congress on such issues as war powers, state secrets, CIA whistle-blowing, covert spending, NSA surveillance, executive privilege, executive spending discretion, presidential reorganization authority, Congress and the Constitution, the legislative veto, the item veto, the pocket veto, recess appointments, the budget process, the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, the balanced budget amendment, biennial budgeting, presidential impoundment powers, and executive lobbying.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capitol Dome
    THE CAPITOL DOME The Capitol in the Movies John Quincy Adams and Speakers of the House Irish Artists in the Capitol Complex Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way A MAGAZINE OF HISTORY PUBLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL HISTORICAL SOCIETYVOLUME 55, NUMBER 22018 From the Editor’s Desk Like the lantern shining within the Tholos Dr. Paula Murphy, like Peart, studies atop the Dome whenever either or both America from the British Isles. Her research chambers of Congress are in session, this into Irish and Irish-American contributions issue of The Capitol Dome sheds light in all to the Capitol complex confirms an import- directions. Two of the four articles deal pri- ant artistic legacy while revealing some sur- marily with art, one focuses on politics, and prising contributions from important but one is a fascinating exposé of how the two unsung artists. Her research on this side of can overlap. “the Pond” was supported by a USCHS In the first article, Michael Canning Capitol Fellowship. reveals how the Capitol, far from being only Another Capitol Fellow alumnus, John a palette for other artist’s creations, has been Busch, makes an ingenious case-study of an artist (actor) in its own right. Whether as the historical impact of steam navigation. a walk-on in a cameo role (as in Quiz Show), Throughout the nineteenth century, steam- or a featured performer sharing the marquee boats shared top billing with locomotives as (as in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington), the the most celebrated and recognizable motif of Capitol, Library of Congress, and other sites technological progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Building As Completed, from Walter's Designs
    CHAPTER XVI THE BUILDING AS COMPLETED, FROM WALTER’S DESIGNS DWARD CLARK supervised the completion of the Capitol the old Senate Chamber being devoted to the court room and the west from the designs of Thomas U. Walter, leaving the building as front being used by the court officials for office and robing rooms.1 it stands to-day. The terraces on the west, north, and south are The attic story [Plate 223] is so arranged in each wing that the a part of the general landscape scheme of Frederick Law Olm- public has access from its corridors to the galleries of the House and Ested. The building consists of the central or old building, and two wings, Senate Chambers, with provision for the press and committee rooms or the Capitol extension, with the new Dome on the old building. facing the exterior walls of the building. Document rooms are also pro- The cellar [Plate 220] contained space on the central western vided on this floor. extension available for office and committee rooms. Other portions of Plates 224, 225, 225a show the eastern front of the building as the cellar are given up to the heating and ventilating apparatus, or are completed, the principal new features being the porticoes on the wings, used for storage. Beneath the center of the Dome a vault was built in which are similar to the central portico designed by Latrobe. Although the cellar to contain the remains of George Washington, but because of the original design of Thornton contemplated a central portico he did the objection of the family to his burial in the Capitol his body never not contemplate the broad flight of steps which extends to the ground rested in the contemplated spot.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AMERICAN POWER All- Stars
    THE AMERICAN POWER All- Stars Scorecard & Voting Guide History About every two years, when Congress takes up an energy bill, the Big Oil Team and the Clean Energy Team go head to head on the floor of the U.S. Senate -- who will prevail and shape our nation’s energy policy? The final rosters for the two teams are now coming together, re- flecting Senators’ votes on energy and climate legislation. Senators earn their spot on the Big Oil Team by voting to maintain America’s ailing energy policy with its en- trenched big government subsidies for oil companies, lax oversight on safety and the environment for oil drilling, leases and permits for risky sources of oil, and appointments of regulators who have cozy relationships with the industry. Senators get onto the Clean Energy Team by voting for a new energy policy that will move Amer- ica away from our dangerous dependence on oil and other fossil fuels, and toward cleaner, safer sources of energy like wind, solar, geothermal, and sustainable biomass. This new direction holds the opportunity to make American power the energy technology of the future while creating jobs, strengthening our national security, and improving our environment. Introduction Lobbyists representing the two teams’ sponsors storm the halls of the Congress for months ahead of the votes to sway key players to vote for their side. The Big Oil Team’s sponsors, which include BP and the American Petroleum Institute (API), use their colossal spending power to hire sly K-Street lobbyists who make closed-door deals with lawmakers, sweetened with sizable campaign contribu- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tips for Visitors
    Information for Visiting Public Entrances Hours for Visiting Public* Metro/Parking The Library occupies three buildings on Capitol The closest Metro Stations are Capitol South Hill. Most visitors first come to the historic Thomas Jefferson Building (Blue/Orange/Silver line—a 2 block walk) or Thomas Jefferson Building, located directly east 10 First Street S.E. Union Station (Red line—a ½ mile walk). of the U.S. Capitol Building. The Main Entrance Washington, DC 20540 is at the top of the Grand Staircase facing First Monday–Saturday The Library does not provide parking. Limited Street, SE. 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m. metered and 2-hour zoned parking is available 1st street SE, between Independence Avenue in the surrounding neighborhoods. Limited and East Capitol Street public parking options include Union Station. Accessibility The Library buildings are fully accessible with James Madison Memorial Building elevators to all levels. The ADA entrance for 101 Independence Ave SE Admissions and Ticketing visitors to the Jefferson Building is at the Monday–Saturday Admission to the Library is free and no tickets driveway level beneath the Grand Staircase. 8:30 a.m.–5:00 p.m. or reservations are required for admission. Wheelchairs are available on a first-come, first- Visitors are welcome to visit the Great Hall and served basis from the Jefferson Building John Adams Building exhibitions at their own pace using available Ground Floor Information Desk for use during 10 Second Street S.E. printed materials or to participate in a guided your visit. Braille brochures are available. Monday–Saturday tour (see below).
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Access to Information in the United States Congress
    Draft of 5/27/2021 – FOR DISCUSSION Increasing Access to Information in the United States Congress Thomas M. Susman “When the FOIA was on the House floor, right before the vote, Members lined up before the bill’s manager, John Moss. Each in turn asked ‘John, is this going to apply to us?’ When Moss replied ‘Absolutely not,’ the Member responded: ‘Well, then I’ll vote for it.’”1 ---------- “If it’s good for the Executive branch agencies, why isn’t it good enough for the Congress?”2 By its express terms, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) applies only to “agencies,” defined in the Administrative Procedure Act as “each authority of the Government of the United States . but does not include—(A) the Congress.”3 The “Final Report and Recommendations” of the 2018-2020 Freedom of Information Act Advisory Committee’s Report to the Archivist of the United States proposed: In the spirit of expanding the reach of FOIA, we believe that the next term of the Committee should give due consideration to the possibility of extending some aspects of FOIA to parts of the legislative and judicial branches.4 This memorandum reflects the conclusions following “due consideration” given to this issue, as to the legislative branch, by the Legislation Subcommittee (“Subcommittee”) of the 2020-2022 FOIA Advisory Committee. The Subcommittee’s consideration included a public presentation to the full Committee on March 3, 2021, from experts on access to both legislative and judicial branch records. Our proposal is that, pursuant to the Advisory Committee’s conclusion, the Archivist should recommend to Congress the following: Congress should adopt rules [or enact legislation] to establish procedures for effecting public access to legislative branch records in the possession of congressional support offices and agencies modeled after those procedures contained in the Freedom of Information Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Hci for Real: Designing Technology in Support of a Social Movement
    FEMINIST HCI FOR REAL: DESIGNING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF A SOCIAL MOVEMENT ADissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Jill P. Dimond In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Human-Centered Computing in the School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology December 2012 FEMINIST HCI FOR REAL: DESIGNING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF A SOCIAL MOVEMENT Approved by: Professor Amy Bruckman, Advisor Professor Elizabeth Mynatt School of Interactive Computing School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Wenda Bauschspies Professor Shaowen Bardzell School of History, Sciences, and School of Informatics and Computing Technology Indiana University Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Eric Gilbert Date Approved: 14 August 2012 School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology For the Hollaback activists and for those working to stop street harassment. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There have been many people who have supported me in this journey—admittedly, it takes a community to raise a doctoral graduate. First, I would like to thank everyone from Hollaback. To Emily May for her tenac- ity, wisdom, friendship, and also for her openness to participate in this work—thank you for all that you do. To Inti Maria Tidball-Binz, Lauren Alston, Crystal Rodgers, and Daphne LaRose—I admire your strength, acumen, and judgement. Thank you all for reading drafts of my chapters and putting yourself out there so that this work can help us all to grow. I would also like to thank Veronica Pinto for her hard work in growing the Hollaback community. Thank you to Alex Alston and Amalia Rose for helping me conduct and transcribe the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBRARY of CONGRESS 101 Independence Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20540 Phone, 202–707–5000
    LEGISLATIVE BRANCH 53 BookstoresÐGovernment Printing Office City Address Telephone Washington, DC, area: Main Bookstore ..................... 710 N. Capitol St. NW. ................................................................................ 202±512±0132 McPherson Square ............... 1510 H St. NW. ........................................................................................... 202±653±5075 Retail Sales Outlet ................ 8660 Cherry Ln., Laurel, MD ....................................................................... 301±953±7974 Atlanta, GA ............................... Suite 120, 1st Union Plz., 999 Peachtree St. NE. ...................................... 404±347±1900 Birmingham, AL ........................ 2021 3d Ave. N. .......................................................................................... 205±731±1056 Boston, MA ............................... Rm. 169, 10 Causeway St. ......................................................................... 617±720±4180 Chicago, IL ............................... Rm. 124, 401 S. State St. ........................................................................... 312±353±5133 Cleveland, OH .......................... Rm. 1653, 1240 E. 9th St. .......................................................................... 216±522±4922 Columbus, OH .......................... Rm. 207, 200 N. High St. ............................................................................ 614±469±6956 Dallas, TX ................................. Rm. 1C50, 1100 Commerce
    [Show full text]
  • The President's Reorganization Authority
    Order Code RL30876 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The President’s Reorganization Authority: Review and Analysis March 8, 2001 name redacted Specialist in Government Organization and Management Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The President’s Reorganization Authority: Review and Analysis Summary Among the initiatives being promoted with the beginning of the Administration of President George W. Bush is that of renewing the President’s lapsed authority to submit reorganization plans to Congress. The general rationale offered for renewing this authority is that it would provide additional flexibility and discretion to the President in organizing the executive branch to promote “economy and efficiency” as well as his political priorities. The regular legislative route for considering presidential proposals involving organizational changes is deemed by reorganization authority supporters as being unduly slow and cumbersome. Thus, the proposal to permit the President to submit reorganization plans subject to mandatory congressional consideration with “fast track” procedures is viewed by the reorganization proposal’s proponents as a necessary reform for good government. Critics of the reorganization plan authority reject the arguments and assumptions behind the proposal and defend the efficacy and legitimacy of the regular legislative process for executive reorganization proposals. This report addresses three specific issues: (1) the historical basis and use of the President’s reorganization authority; (2) the factors contributing to the lapse of the President’s reorganization authority in 1984,1 and (3) thoughts on the future of reorganization in the executive branch. 1 It is worth noting that the Reorganization Act of 1977, as amended, remains “on the books,” but is not presently operative for execution as it expired on December 31, 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy and Legislative Research for Congressional Staff: Finding Documents, Analysis, News, and Training
    Policy and Legislative Research for Congressional Staff: Finding Documents, Analysis, News, and Training Updated June 28, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43434 Policy and Legislative Research for Congressional Staff Summary This report is intended to serve as a finding aid for congressional documents, executive branch documents and information, news articles, policy analysis, contacts, and training, for use in policy and legislative research. It is not intended to be a definitive list of all resources, but rather a guide to pertinent subscriptions available in the House and Senate in addition to selected resources freely available to the public. This report is intended for use by congressional staff and will be updated as needed. Congressional Research Service Policy and Legislative Research for Congressional Staff Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Congressional Documents ............................................................................................................... 1 Executive Branch Documents and Information ............................................................................... 9 Legislative Support Agencies ........................................................................................................ 12 News, Policy, and Scholarly Research Sources ............................................................................. 13 Training and
    [Show full text]
  • Pervasive Health 2013
    Pervasive Health 2013 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare Technical Programme San Servolo Island Venice, Italy 5th to 8th of May 2013 Conference at a glance Monday, May 6 Tuesday, May 7 Wednesday, May 8 8:00-8:45 REGISTRATION REGISTRATION 8:45-9:00 CONFERENCE OPENING ANNOUNCEMENT SESSION C (SHORT PAPERS) 9:00-10:00 KEYNOTE SPEAKER KEYNOTE SPEAKER From data capture to Elizabeth Mynatt Yvonne Rogers diagnosis 10:00-10:15 COFFEE BREAK SESSION 1 SESSION 4 SESSION 7 Gamification and Health professionals’ Self-monitoring 10:15-13:15 virtual environments needs technologies SESSION 2 SESSION 5 SESSION 8 Activity and behaviour Supporting patients’ Patients and care- evaluation needs givers. 13:15-14:15 LUNCH SESSION 3 SESSION 6 SESSION D (SHORT PAPERS) 14:15-15:45 Gait and exercise Sleep and Affect In-home monitoring evaluation monitoring SESSION E (SHORT PAPERS) Personal tracking and 15:45-16:00 COFFEE BREAK measurement SESSION A (SHORT PAPERS) 16:00 Posters and Demos 16:15 Townhall Meeting Therapy and 16:00 Doc. Colloquium Rehabilitation 17:00 Closing remarks 16:00-18:00 GALA DINNER SESSION B (SHORT PAPERS) End of Pervasive Health 2013 Supporting the elderly (20:00) Monday, May 6, 2013 OPENING | VENUE SALA TEATRO 8:45 – 9:00 9:00 – 10:00 KEYNOTE TALK SESSION CHAIR: TBD PERVASIVE HEALTH: EMPOWERING INDIVIDUALS, FACILITATING LEARNING AND DELIVERING BETTER HEALTH Elizabeth Mynatt Professor Executive Director, Institute for People and Technology Georgia Institute of Technology, USA While health is a pervasive human concern, healthcare is often siloed into acute care centers with misaligned incentives and fragmented care.
    [Show full text]
  • A National Research Agenda for Intelligent Infrastructure
    A National Research Agenda for Intelligent Infrastructure Elizabeth Mynatt Jennifer Clark Greg Hager Georgia Tech Georgia Tech Johns Hopkins University Computing Community Consortium Dan Lopresti Greg Morrisett Klara Nahrstedt Lehigh Univeristy Cornell University University of Illinois George Pappas Shwetak Patel Jennifer Rexford University of Pennsylvania University of Washington Princeton University Helen Wright Ben Zorn Computing Community Consortium Microsoft Research Our infrastructure touches the day-to-day life of each of our fellow citizens, and its capabilities, integrity and sustainability are crucial to the overall competitiveness and prosperity of our country. Unfortunately, the current state of U.S. infrastructure is not good: the American Society of Civil Engineers’ latest report on America’s infrastructure ranked it at a D+ — in need of $3.9 trillion in new investments. This dire situation constrains the growth of our economy, threatens our quality of life, and puts our global leadership at risk. The ASCE report called out three actions that need to be taken to address our infrastructure problem: 1) investment and planning in the system; 2) bold leadership by elected officials at the local and federal state; and 3) planning sustainability and resiliency in our infrastructure1. While our immediate infrastructure needs are critical, it would be shortsighted to simply replicate more of what we have today. By doing so, we miss the opportunity to create Intelligent Infrastructure that will provide the foundation for increased safety and resilience, improved efficiencies and civic services, and broader economic opportunities and job growth. Indeed, our challenge is to proactively engage the declining, incumbent national infrastructure system and not merely repair it, but to enhance it; to create an internationally competitive cyber-physical system that provides an immediate opportunity for better services for citizens and that acts as a platform for a 21st century, high-tech economy and beyond.
    [Show full text]