DOCSLIB.ORG

Us Border Patrol San Diego Sector, Imperial Beach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP PLAN FOR REPLACEMENT, OPERATION,AND MAINTENANCE OF TACTICAL INFRASTRUCTURE U.S. BORDER PATROL SAN DIEGO SECTOR, IMPERIAL BEACH DQG%URZQ)LHOGSTATION6, CALIFORNIA Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection U.S. Border Patrol COVER SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP PLAN FOR REPLACEMENT, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF TACTICAL INFRASTRUCTURE U.S. BORDER PATROL SAN DIEGO SECTOR IMPERIAL BEACH AND BROWN FIELD STATIONS, CALIFORNIA Responsible Agencies: U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Border Patrol (USBP). Parties Consulted: Department of the Interior (DOI) including the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE); United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC); Tijuana National Estuarine Research Reserve (TNERR); California State Parks; California office of Historic Preservation; California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW); California Coastal Commission (CCC); Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC); San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board; County of San Diego; City of San Diego; City of Imperial Beach; and Metropolitan Transit System Railroad; and local tribes. Affected Location: United States/Mexico international border in San Diego County, California. Project Description: The Project replaces approximately 14 miles of primary pedestrian fence and other Border Infrastructure System (BIS) improvements along the southwestern border of the United States. The existing primary fence was installed in the 1990s and does not meet current operational needs; the purpose of the new taller and more substantial bollard-style wall is to improve operational control of the border. Project elements include design, site preparation and material delivery, fence removal and replacement, improvements to border security infrastructure, construction of an all-weather access road and lighting improvements. The new fence will be 18 to 30 feet high and the all-weather road will be constructed along the length of the new bollard-style wall. The Project Area1 will be generally limited to the 60-foot wide Roosevelt Reservation corridor that runs along the United States/Mexico border; however, some hardening of surface stream crossings will occur outside that boundary, as will two primary staging areas that are placed just outside the BIS area and infrastructure improvements that are required on the north levee of the Tijuana River. To ensure full assessment of Project activities, a larger Study Area2 was developed for natural and cultural resource impact analysis. Report Designation: Environmental Stewardship Plan (ESP). Abstract: CBP plans to construct, operate, and maintain approximately 14 miles of replacement pedestrian fence, an all-weather road, security infrastructure, and lighting improvements along the United States/Mexico international border in San Diego County, California. The Project Area lies within the USBP San Diego Sector. With the exception of a small portion that is managed by USIBWC and some staging 1 Definition of Project Area: Area in which permanent or temporary impacts may occur from Project construction activities. 2 Definition of Study Area: A variable-width area larger than and encompassing the Project Area, which generally extends from 60 feet wide to approximately 350 feet from the border, developed to thoroughly address all potential impacts within the context of the landscape. and access that will occur on state, county, and city roads, the Project Area is entirely under the administrative jurisdiction of CBP. Project activities will begin near the Pacific Ocean, continuing east along the border, and are divided into four primary segments: the Western, Central, and Eastern segments, and the northern levee of the Tijuana River from the border west to Dairy Mart Road. Construction materials will arrive at two primary staging areas and then be distributed to secondary staging areas in each of the four Project segments. This Environmental Stewardship Plan (ESP) evaluates potential environmental impacts associated with the Project. Protections and Best Management Practices (BMPs) for factors such as air quality, noise, geological resources, water use and quality, biological resources, cultural resources, and hazardous materials have been incorporated into the Project design. The public may obtain additional copies of the ESP from the Project Web site at www.BorderFencePlanning.com; by emailing [email protected]; or by written request to Mr. Loren Flossman, Program Manager, Secure Border Initiative (SBI) Tactical Infrastructure, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 7.2C, Washington, DC 20229, Tel: (877) 752-0420, Fax: (703) 752- 7754. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP PLAN FOR REPLACEMENT, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF TACTICAL INFRASTRUCTURE U.S. BORDER PATROL SAN DIEGO SECTOR IMPERIAL BEACH AND BROWN FIELD STATIONS CALIFORNIA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection U.S. Border Patrol June 2018 ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND On August 2, 2017, the Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to Section 102(c) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996, as amended, issued a waver in order to ensure the expeditious construction of the Project. Although the Secretary’s waiver means that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) no longer has any specific legal obligations under the laws set aside by the waiver, the Department of Homeland Security and CBP recognize the importance of responsible environmental stewardship. To that end, CBP has prepared this Environmental Stewardship Plan (ESP), which analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with construction of tactical infrastructure in the U.S. Border Patrol’s (USBP’s) San Diego Sector (Figures 2.1, Project Location and Segments and Figure 2.2, Project Study Area and Location References). The ESP also discusses CBP’s plans as to how it can mitigate potential environmental impacts. The ESP will guide CBP’s efforts going forward. As it moves forward with the Project described in this ESP, CBP will continue to work in a collaborative manner with local governments, state and Federal land managers, and the interested public to identify environmentally sensitive resources and develop appropriate best management practices (BMPs) to avoid or minimize adverse impacts resulting from the installation of tactical infrastructure. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT The Project is being carried out pursuant to Section 102(a) of IIRIRA. Section 102(a) of IIRIRA provides that the Secretary shall take such actions as may be necessary to install additional physical barriers and roads (including the removal of obstacles to detection of illegal entrants) in the vicinity of the U.S border to deter illegal crossings. In section 102(b) of IIRIRA, Congress has called for the installation of additional fencing, barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors on the southwest border. Finally, in section 102(c) of IIRIRA, Congress granted to the Secretary the authority to waive all legal requirements as determined necessary to ensure the expeditious construction of barriers and roads authorized by section 102 of IIRIRA. In August of 2017, the Secretary issued a waiver covering, among other things, the replacement of approximately 14 miles of primary pedestrian barrier in the United States Border Patrol (USBP) San Diego Sector (the Project). The existing pedestrian fence no longer meets USBP’s operational needs; it will be replaced with a bollard wall that will improve both operational efficiency and safety for those USBP Agents who work in the area. The Secretary’s waiver means that CBP does not have any specific legal obligations under the laws that were included in the waiver, but just as was the case with past projects covered by a waiver, DHS and CBP recognize the importance of responsible environmental stewardship of our valuable natural and cultural resources. OUTREACH AND AGENCY COORDINATION CBP notified relevant Federal, state, and local agencies of the Project and requested input on environmental concerns such parties might have regarding the Project. CBP has coordinated with the Department of the Interior (DOI) including the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service San Diego Sector Fence Replacement Project Environmental Stewardship Plan June 2018 ES-2 (USFWS); U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE); United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC); Tijuana National Estuarine Research Reserve (TNERR); California State Parks; California office of Historic Preservation; California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW); California Coastal Commission (CCC); Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC); San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board; County of San Diego; City of San Diego; City of Imperial Beach; Metropolitan Transit System Railroad; along with various Native American tribes. Although the Secretary issued the waiver, CBP has continued to work in a collaborative manner with federal, state, and local agencies, Native American tribes, and other stakeholders and has considered and incorporated agency comments into this ESP. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT DHS and CBP will remove and replace approximately 14 miles of primary pedestrian fence, construct an all-weather road, and install lighting improvements along the United States/Mexico
Recommended publications
  • Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Improvements to the Tijuana River Flood Control Project

    Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Improvements to the Tijuana River Flood Control Project

    Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Improvements to the Tijuana River Flood Control Project Lead Agency: United States Section International Boundary and Water Commission El Paso, Texas Cooperating Agency: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District, California Technical Support: August 2007 PARSONS Austin, Texas Cover Sheet PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TIJUANA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT (X) Draft ( ) Final Lead Agency The USIBWC will apply the programmatic evaluation as an overall guidance for future United States Section, International environmental evaluations of individual Boundary and Water Commission improvement projects, the implementation (USIBWC) of which is anticipated or possible within a El Paso, Texas 20-year timeframe. Cooperating Agencies Other Requirements Served U.S. Army Corps of Engineers This PEIS is intended to serve other Abstract environmental review and consultation requirements pursuant to 40 CFR The USIBWC anticipates the need to 1502.25(a) improve capabilities or functionality of the Tijuana River Flood Control Project. Comments Submittal Improvement measures associated with the The Draft PEIS will be available for a project core mission of flood protection and 45-day public review period. Comments boundary stabilization are evaluated under should be directed by September 24, 2007 the Enhanced Operation and Maintenance to: (EOM) Alternative, while measures in support of local or regional initiatives for Mr. Daniel Borunda increased utilization of the project or to Environmental Management Division improve environmental conditions are USIBWC evaluated under the Multipurpose Project 4171 North Mesa St., C-100 Management (MPM) Alternative. El Paso, Texas 79902 This Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) evaluates potential Date of Draft Availability to USEPA and environmental consequences alternatives the Public: under consideration for improvement of the Tijuana River Flood Control Project.
  • Lessons from San Diego's Border Wall

    Lessons from San Diego's Border Wall

    RESEARCH REPORT (CBP Photo/Mani Albrecht) LESSONS FROM SAN DIEGO'S BORDER WALL The limits to using walls for migration, drug trafficking challenges By Adam Isacson and Maureen Meyer December 2017 " The border doesn’t need a wall. It needs better-equipped ports of entry, investi- gative capacity, technology, and far more ability to deal with humanitarian flows. In its current form, the 2018 Homeland Security Appropriations bill is pursuing a wrong and wasteful approach. The ex- perience of San Diego makes that clear." LESSONS FROM SAN DIEGO'S BORDER WALL December 2017 | 2 SUMMARY The prototypes for President Trump's proposed border wall are currently sitting just outside San Diego, California, an area that serves as a perfect example of how limited walls, fences, and barriers can be when dealing with migration and drug trafficking challenges. As designated by stomsCu and Border Protection, the San Diego sector covers 60 miles of the westernmost U.S.-Mexico border, and 46 of them are already fenced off. Here, fence-building has revealed a new set of border challenges that a wall can’t fix. The San Diego sector shows that: • Fences or walls can reduce migration in urban areas, but make no difference in rural areas. In densely populated border areas, border-crossers can quickly mix in to the population. But nearly all densely populated sections of the U.S.-Mexico border have long since been walled off. In rural areas, where crossers must travel miles of terrain, having to climb a wall first is not much of a deterrent. A wall would be a waste of scarce budget resources.
  • May 18, 2012 Projection of the CARB 2008 Emissions Inventory For

    May 18, 2012 Projection of the CARB 2008 Emissions Inventory For

    May 18, 2012 Projection of the CARB 2008 Emissions Inventory for Northern Mexico to Future Years INTRODUCTION In ERG (2009), the baseline 1999 national emissions inventory for Mexico was projected to the years 2008, 2012, and 2030. These projections were used to extrapolate the year 2008 emissions inventory for Baja California (CARB, 2012) to the years 2023 and 2030 for air quality analyses within southern California. In their analyses, ERG (2009) used projections of population growth, industrial development, and land use planning to estimate future emissions; in many cases, by individual source classification code (SCC). However, this level of detail is beyond the scope of what can be done in the short term. Also, while the emissions inventory generated for Baja California by the CARB (2012) used ERG’s year 2008 inventory as a starting point, the final inventory was appreciably different. In this analysis, the relative changes in emissions growth quantified by ERG for the years 1999, 2008, and 2030 were used to prepare emissions-response curves, which were then used to scale the CARB 2008 inventory to future years. PREPARATION OF EMISSIONS RESPONSE FUNCTIONS The emissions inventories developed by ERG (2009) for the years 1999, 2008, 2012, and 2030 were provided in four broadly defined groups: on-road, non-road, point, and non-point emissions. Within these groups, emissions for CO, NOx, SOx, COT (VOC), PM10 (PM), and NH3 were provided by State and by Municipality. To avoid being confounded by differences in spatial distributions and source classifications, emissions within each group were summed by State and Municipality.
  • Opportunities for Regional Collaboration on the Border: Sharing the European Border Experience with the San Diego/Tijuana Region

    Opportunities for Regional Collaboration on the Border: Sharing the European Border Experience with the San Diego/Tijuana Region

    Opportunities for Regional Collaboration on the Border: Sharing the European border experience with the San Diego/Tijuana region Dr. Freerk Boedeltje, Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias, San Diego State University, May 2012 How to read this white paper? This white paper highlights best practices and barriers for local cross border cooperation across the European Union and will suggest policy options relevant to the San Diego-Tijuana region. The research done in Europe has been carried out as part of two large scheme EU wide projects sponsored under the 5th and 6th framework Programme of European Commission. Code named EXLINA and EUDIMENSIONS, the research consisted of a consortium of multiple universities across the European Union and took 8 years between 2002 and 2009. Both project have sought to understand the actual and potential role of cross border co-operation beyond the external borders of the EU and focused on specific local development issues, including economic development, cultural and educational matters, urban development, local democracy and environmental issues. The research was designed to address practical aspects of cross-border co- operation across and beyond the external borders of the European Union. The case studies that covered most part of the external borders of the EU centred on how changes within Europe’s political space are being interpreted and used by actors with a stake in bi-national/cross-border cooperation. This whitepaper compares and contrast the San Diego-Tijuana realities with cross border cooperation in border regions of the European Union. In addition to improving our understanding how local border regions function within a global context, the whitepaper highlight best practices and barriers for local cross border cooperation and will suggest policy options relevant to the San Diego Region and the Tijuana Tecate and Playas de Rosarito Metropolitan Zone.
  • San Diego County/Regional Native American Organizations and Native American Nations

    San Diego County/Regional Native American Organizations and Native American Nations

    SAN DIEGO COUNTY/REGIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS AND NATIVE AMERICAN NATIONS ORGANIZATION ADDRESS PHONE & FAX _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ AHMIUM Education Inc. 701 Esplanade St., Ste. “H” Ernie Salgado, Jr. San Jacinto, CA 92582 800-924-8744 FAX 909-654-3089 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ All Indian Mission PO Box 2069 Ray St. Charles Housing Authority Valley Center, CA 92082 760-751-5100 49002 Golsh Rd. FAX 760-751-2344 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ American Indian Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 2515 Cheri Myron Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 619-540-5398 cell 858-756-8020 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ American Indian Chamber of 555 W. 5th St., 31st Fl. 213-440-3232 Commerce of Southern CA Los Angeles CA. 90013 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ American Indian Community 729 Poinsetta Pk. So. Ted Haberfield Foundation Encinitas, CA 92024 858-204-5055 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ American Indian Counseling Center 17707 Studebaker Rd. 562-402-0677 Cerritos, CA 90703 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  • Draft Recovery Plan for Deinandra Conjugens

    Draft Recovery Plan for Deinandra Conjugens

    70526 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 243 / Thursday, December 18, 2003 / Notices canopy may be present (Bakeman 1997). locations. Research has been conducted, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR When present, the shrub canopy is often such as radio-telemetry studies on Salix spp. (willow), although shrub habitat use and movements by Preble’s Fish and Wildlife Service species including Symphoricarpus spp. that has added to current knowledge Draft Recovery Plan for Deinandra (snowberry), Prunus virginiana about the species’ biology. There is new conjugens (Otay Tarplant) (chokecherry), Crataegus spp. information verifying differences in (hawthorn), Quercus gambelli (Gambel’s morphological characteristics between AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, oak), Alnus incana (alder), Betula Zapus hudsonius preblei and related Interior. fontinalis (river birch), Rhus trilobata taxa (Connor and Shenk, in press). ACTION: Notice of document availability (skunkbrush), Prunus americana (wild plum), Amorpha fruticosa (lead plant), Information is available on the for review and comment. presence of and possible increases in Cornus sericea (dogwood), and others SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife threats to Preble’s and its habitat also may occur (Bakeman 1997; Shenk Service (‘‘we’’), announces the and Eussen 1998). throughout a large portion of the availability of the Draft Recovery Plan Additional research on the species’ species’ range, as evidenced by—(1) for Deinandra conjugens (Otay Tarplant) habitat has supported and refined the section 7 consultations conducted to for public review. This draft recovery definition of habitat used in the 1998 address adverse effects to the Preble’s plan includes specific criteria and listing rule. This recent information from Federal actions and (2) measures to be taken in order to indicates that, although Preble’s have applications by private parties for effectively recover the species to the rarely been trapped in uplands adjacent permits to take Preble’s.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 248/Tuesday, December 28, 2004

    Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 248/Tuesday, December 28, 2004

    Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2004 / Notices 77769 hours of response: 350 PHAs will be and Universities Program grants information to: (1) Evaluate whether the surveyed. Average time to complete the application and grants management. proposed collection of information is survey is 60 minutes. Respondents will Grants assist Tribal Colleges and necessary for the proper performance of only be contacted once. Total burden Universities to build, expand, renovate, the functions of the agency, including hours are 350. and equip their own facilities. whether the information will have Status of the proposed information DATES: Comments Due Date: January 27, practical utility; (2) evaluate the collection: Pending OMB approval. 2005. accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the Authority: Section 3506 of the Paperwork ADDRESSES: Interested persons are burden of the proposed collection of Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, invited to submit comments regarding information; (3) enhance the quality, as amended. this proposal. Comments should refer to utility, and clarity of the information to Dated: December 20, 2004 the proposal by name and/or OMB be collected; and (4) minimize the Dennis C. Shea, approval Number (2528–0215) and burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including Assistant Secretary for Policy Development should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, and Research. Office of Management and Budget, New through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or [FR Doc. 04–28281 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; fax: 202–395–6974. other forms of information technology, BILLING CODE 4210–62–M e.g., permitting electronic submission of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: responses.
  • Vier Portillo

    Vier Portillo

    No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 444444444444444444444444U JAVIER PORTILLO, Petitioner, - v - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 4444444444444444444444444U PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 4444444444444444444444444U ELIZABETH A. MISSAKIAN P.O. Box 601879 San Diego, CA 92160 (619) 233-6534 Counsel for Petitioner JAVIER PORTILLO LIST OF PARTIES [X All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. - prefix - QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Ninth Circuit’s analysis of the facts was inadequate and whether, when the entirety of facts presented at trial was considered, there was sufficient evidence that petitioner Javier Portillo had knowledge of narcotics hidden in his vehicle at the time he crossed the border from Mexico into the United States. - prefix - TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.. iii OPINION BELOW. 1 JURISDICTION. 2 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS. 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE . 2 STATEMENT OF FACTS. 3 Government’s Case-in-Chief. 3 Defense Case. 8 Testimony of Javier Portillo. 9 REASON TO GRANT THE WRIT. 11 THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOR THE JURY TO CONCLUDE THAT JAVIER PORTILLO KNEW OF THE PRESENCE OF NARCOTICS WITHIN HIS VEHICLE WHEN HE CROSSED INTO THE UNITED STATES AT THE SAN YSIDRO PORT OF ENTRY.. 12 A. The Claim is Preserved.. 12 B. Standard of Review . 12 C. Evidence at Trial Was Insufficient to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt that Javier Portillo Knew There Were Narcotics in his Vehicle.
  • Quarry Creek Masterplan Final Environ~R~Ental :C1r1pact Report SCH#: 2012021039

    Quarry Creek Masterplan Final Environ~R~Ental :C1r1pact Report SCH#: 2012021039

    Quarry Creek MasterPlan Final Environ~r~ental :C1r1pact Report SCH#: 2012021039 I I Prepared for: Prepared By: 4~ CityOf ~~ > Carlsbad Hl1 .January 2013 Final Environmental Impact Report Quarry Creek Master Plan Carlsbad, California SCH No. 2012021039 January 2013 Prepared for City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc. 8690 Balboa Avenue, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92123 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... XI 0.1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY............................................................................................ 0.1 -1 0.2 CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS............................................................................................ 0.2-1 0.2.1 REVISED AND SUPPLEMENTAL TEXT ................................................................ .0.2 -1 0.2.2 REVISED MITIGATION MEASURES ......................................................................0.2 -2 0.3 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS.................................................................................................... 0.3-1 0.4 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM.................................................... OA-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................
  • 2013 San Diego

    2013 San Diego

    BINATIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA January 14, 2013 Binational Hazardous Materials Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Among the County Of San Diego, the City of San Diego, California, and the City of Tijuana, Baja California January 14, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2005-Present ...................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2003 .................................................................................................... 6 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... 10 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES................................................................................................... 17 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.0 TIJUANA/SAN DIEGO BORDER REGION ................................................................. 25 1.1 General Aspects of the Region ........................................................................................ 25 1.1.1 Historical and Cultural Background ................................................................ 25 1.1.2 Geographic Location
  • Border Field State Park, Who Shared an Incredible Amount of Knowledge and Inspiration with Me

    Border Field State Park, Who Shared an Incredible Amount of Knowledge and Inspiration with Me

    Client: California State Parks Faculty Advisor: Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris A comprehensive project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Urban and Regional Planning Disclaimer: This report was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master in Urban and Regional Planning degree in the Department of Urban Planning at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). It was prepared at the direction of the Department and of California State Parks as a planning client. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department, the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, UCLA as a whole, or the client. 2 Acknowledgments UCLA’s Luskin Center for Innovation provided partial support for this project through a Graduate Research Grant. California State Parks, which provided partial support for the research completed in this project. Anne Marie Tipton, Education Coordinator at Border Field State Park, who shared an incredible amount of knowledge and inspiration with me. Jenny Rigby, of The Acorn Group, who introduced me to this project and worked with me every step of the way, providing advice and guidance, pointed me to important sources of information, and gave thorough and thoughtful edits to this document. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, my faculty advisor for this project, was also my faculty advisor throughout my master’s program. I am so grateful for her advice, guidance, and support over the past two years. My family and friends who encouraged me along the way, and understood when I wasn’t around. And especially to my husband, Charles Thomas, who has been by my side, supporting me every step of the way, and our daughters, Egeria and Emma, who lovingly and patiently were there to cheer me on.
  • Recovery Plan for Deinandra Conjugens

    Recovery Plan for Deinandra Conjugens

    77770 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2004 / Notices 1988, and extended through Public Law DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR We listed Deinandra conjugens as a 105–355, November 13, 1998. federally threatened species on October Fish and Wildlife Service 13, 1998 (63 FR 54938); we designated FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. critical habitat on December 10, 2002 Allen Sachse, Executive Director, Recovery Plan for Deinandra (67 FR 76030). Deinandra conjugens is Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage conjugens (Otay tarplant) Corridor Commission, 1 South Third annual plant typically found on clay Street, 8th Floor, Easton, PA 18042, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, soils in grasslands, open coastal sage (610) 923–3548. Interior. scrub, and maritime succulent scrub. It ACTION: Notice of document availability. is restricted to southwestern San Diego Dated: December 21, 2004. County, California, and northwestern C. Allen Sachse, SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Baja California, Mexico; its status in Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh Service (we) announces the availability Mexico is unclear. National Heritage Corridor Commission. of the Recovery Plan for Deinandra [= Urban development and agricultural Hemizonia] conjugens (Otay tarplant). [FR Doc. 04–28379 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] activities, invasion of nonnative species, This plant species is found in BILLING CODE 6820–PE–M and habitat fragmentation and southwestern San Diego County, degradation have resulted in the loss of California, and northwestern Baja suitable habitat across the Deinandra DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR California, Mexico. conjugens’ range. The species annual ADDRESSES: Printed copies of this habit and self-incompatible breeding Office of the Secretary recovery plan are available by request system potentially create additional from the U.S.