DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Recovery Plan for Deinandra Conjugens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Recovery Plan for Deinandra Conjugens 70526 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 243 / Thursday, December 18, 2003 / Notices canopy may be present (Bakeman 1997). locations. Research has been conducted, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR When present, the shrub canopy is often such as radio-telemetry studies on Salix spp. (willow), although shrub habitat use and movements by Preble’s Fish and Wildlife Service species including Symphoricarpus spp. that has added to current knowledge Draft Recovery Plan for Deinandra (snowberry), Prunus virginiana about the species’ biology. There is new conjugens (Otay Tarplant) (chokecherry), Crataegus spp. information verifying differences in (hawthorn), Quercus gambelli (Gambel’s morphological characteristics between AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, oak), Alnus incana (alder), Betula Zapus hudsonius preblei and related Interior. fontinalis (river birch), Rhus trilobata taxa (Connor and Shenk, in press). ACTION: Notice of document availability (skunkbrush), Prunus americana (wild plum), Amorpha fruticosa (lead plant), Information is available on the for review and comment. presence of and possible increases in Cornus sericea (dogwood), and others SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife threats to Preble’s and its habitat also may occur (Bakeman 1997; Shenk Service (‘‘we’’), announces the and Eussen 1998). throughout a large portion of the availability of the Draft Recovery Plan Additional research on the species’ species’ range, as evidenced by—(1) for Deinandra conjugens (Otay Tarplant) habitat has supported and refined the section 7 consultations conducted to for public review. This draft recovery definition of habitat used in the 1998 address adverse effects to the Preble’s plan includes specific criteria and listing rule. This recent information from Federal actions and (2) measures to be taken in order to indicates that, although Preble’s have applications by private parties for effectively recover the species to the rarely been trapped in uplands adjacent permits to take Preble’s. The Service is point where delisting is warranted. We to riparian areas (Dharman 2001), in the process of preparing a recovery solicit review and comment from the detailed studies of the Preble’s plan for the Preble’s and is involved in public and local, State, and Federal movement patterns using radio- section 7 consultations on Federal agencies on this draft recovery plan. telemetry found Preble’s feeding and activities as well as assisting with the resting in adjacent uplands and DATES: Comments on the draft recovery development of Habitat Conservation traveling considerable distances along plan must be received on or before streams, as far as 1.6 km (1.0 mi) in one Plans addressing many private March 2, 2004 to receive our evening (Shenk and Sivert 1999a; Shenk activities. Through these efforts, we are consideration. continually reviewing and considering and Sivert 1999b; Ryon 1999; Schorr ADDRESSES: Hard copies of the draft 2001). These studies suggest that the all newly available information recovery plan will be available in 2 to Preble’s uses uplands at least as far out regarding the species’ abundance and 4 weeks. An electronic copy of this draft as 100 m (330 ft) beyond the 100-year the threats it faces. plan is now available at http:// floodplain (Ryon 1999; Tanya Shenk, Finding www.pacific.fws.gov/ecoservices/ Colorado Division of Wildlife, in litt. endangered/recovery/default. Written 2002). The Service has reviewed the request for copies of the draft recovery The third petitioner also raised petitions, the material submitted with plan and submission of written several issues specifically dealing with the petitions and subsequent to the comments regarding the plan should be stated increased costs or private petitions, and additional information in addressed to the Field Supervisor, U.S. property takings or life, health, and the Service’s files. On the basis of the Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Fish safety issues, including disease carried best scientific and commercial data and Wildlife Office, 6010 Hidden Valley by deer mice. The Code of Federal available, the Service finds that the Road, Carlsbad, California 92009. Regulations (50 CFR 424.11(b)) states petitions and information in the Supporting documents are available for that the Service must make inspection, by appointment, during determinations based on the basis of the Service’s files do not present substantial information that delisting the Preble’s normal business hours at the above best available scientific and commercial address. information regarding a species’ status, meadow jumping mouse in Colorado without reference to possible economic and Wyoming may be warranted. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: or other impacts of such determination. Kelly Goocher, Fish and Wildlife References Cited Biologist, at the above Carlsbad address New Information Available in the (telephone: 760–431–9440). Service’s Files A complete list of all references cited in this finding is available, upon SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In addition to considering information request, from the Lakewood, Colorado Background provided by the petitioners, if any, the Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES Service also must consider the section). Recovery of endangered or threatened information readily available at the time animals and plants is a primary goal of of this finding. Additional information Authority our endangered species program and the on the Preble’s has become available Endangered Species Act (Act) (16 U.S.C. since the species was listed in 1998 and The authority for this action is section 1531 et seq.). Recovery means since the petitions were received. As 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 improvement of the status of listed cited earlier, numerous surveys have (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). species to the point at which listing is been undertaken throughout the species’ Dated: December 11, 2003. no longer appropriate under the criteria range in suitable habitat areas where the Steve Williams, set out in section 4(a)(1) of the Act. species was presumed to occur but had Recovery plans describe actions not been documented. Some of these Director, Fish and Wildlife Service. considered necessary for the surveys provided verification of Preble’s [FR Doc. 03–31255 Filed 12–17–03; 8:45 am] conservation of the species, establish presence at the survey locations; others BILLING CODE 4310–55–P criteria for downlisting or delisting did not. The survey results indicate that listed species, and estimate time and the species may persist at or may have cost for implementing the measures been extirpated from individual survey needed for recovery. VerDate jul<14>2003 00:05 Dec 18, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM 18DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 243 / Thursday, December 18, 2003 / Notices 70527 The Act requires the development of framework, and protecting key SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife recovery plans for listed species unless populations. Additional measures Service (‘‘we’’) announces the such a plan would not promote the outlined in the draft recovery plan will availability of a draft revised recovery conservation of a particular species. enhance the species’ ability to achieve plan for the ‘Alala¯, or Hawaiian Crow Section 4(f) of the Act requires that recovery. (Corvus hawaiiensis) for public review. public notice and an opportunity for This draft recovery plan recognizes This endemic Hawaiian bird, a member public review and comment be provided efforts by the local jurisdictions to of the family Corvidae, is now believed during recovery plan development. We conserve Deinandra conjugens under to be extinct in the wild and survives will consider all information presented the MSCP, and includes additional only in captivity. The ‘Alala¯ was listed during the public comment period prior conservation measures designed to as an endangered species in 1967 (32 FR to approval of each new or revised ensure D. conjugens will continue to 4001). The original recovery plan for the recovery plan. Substantive technical exist, distributed throughout its extant ‘Alala¯ was published in 1982. comments may result in changes to the and historic range. Recovery is DATES: Comments on the draft revised recovery plan. Substantive comments dependent upon the conservation of recovery plan must be received on or regarding recovery plan implementation sufficient habitat to sustain populations before February 17, 2004 to receive our may not necessarily result in changes to of D. conjugens, as well as populations consideration. the recovery plan, but will be forwarded of its primary pollinators; maintaining ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised to appropriate Federal or other entities genetic variability within the species; recovery plan are available for so that they can take these comments and connect conserved populations to inspection, by appointment, during into account during the course of ensure gene flow (through cross normal business hours at the following implementing recovery actions. pollination). locations: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Individual responses to comments will The ultimate goal of this recovery Service, Pacific Islands Fish and not be provided. plan is to delist Deinandra conjugens Wildlife Office, 300 Ala Moana Deinandra conjugens is an annual through implementation of a variety of Boulevard, Room 3–122, Honolulu, plant in the family Asteraceae. It was recovery actions including: (1) federally listed as a threatened species Hawaii 96850 (telephone 808–792–
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 248/Tuesday, December 28, 2004
    Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2004 / Notices 77769 hours of response: 350 PHAs will be and Universities Program grants information to: (1) Evaluate whether the surveyed. Average time to complete the application and grants management. proposed collection of information is survey is 60 minutes. Respondents will Grants assist Tribal Colleges and necessary for the proper performance of only be contacted once. Total burden Universities to build, expand, renovate, the functions of the agency, including hours are 350. and equip their own facilities. whether the information will have Status of the proposed information DATES: Comments Due Date: January 27, practical utility; (2) evaluate the collection: Pending OMB approval. 2005. accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the Authority: Section 3506 of the Paperwork ADDRESSES: Interested persons are burden of the proposed collection of Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, invited to submit comments regarding information; (3) enhance the quality, as amended. this proposal. Comments should refer to utility, and clarity of the information to Dated: December 20, 2004 the proposal by name and/or OMB be collected; and (4) minimize the Dennis C. Shea, approval Number (2528–0215) and burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including Assistant Secretary for Policy Development should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, and Research. Office of Management and Budget, New through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or [FR Doc. 04–28281 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; fax: 202–395–6974. other forms of information technology, BILLING CODE 4210–62–M e.g., permitting electronic submission of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Deinandra Conjugens
    77770 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2004 / Notices 1988, and extended through Public Law DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR We listed Deinandra conjugens as a 105–355, November 13, 1998. federally threatened species on October Fish and Wildlife Service 13, 1998 (63 FR 54938); we designated FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. critical habitat on December 10, 2002 Allen Sachse, Executive Director, Recovery Plan for Deinandra (67 FR 76030). Deinandra conjugens is Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage conjugens (Otay tarplant) Corridor Commission, 1 South Third annual plant typically found on clay Street, 8th Floor, Easton, PA 18042, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, soils in grasslands, open coastal sage (610) 923–3548. Interior. scrub, and maritime succulent scrub. It ACTION: Notice of document availability. is restricted to southwestern San Diego Dated: December 21, 2004. County, California, and northwestern C. Allen Sachse, SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Baja California, Mexico; its status in Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh Service (we) announces the availability Mexico is unclear. National Heritage Corridor Commission. of the Recovery Plan for Deinandra [= Urban development and agricultural Hemizonia] conjugens (Otay tarplant). [FR Doc. 04–28379 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] activities, invasion of nonnative species, This plant species is found in BILLING CODE 6820–PE–M and habitat fragmentation and southwestern San Diego County, degradation have resulted in the loss of California, and northwestern Baja suitable habitat across the Deinandra DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR California, Mexico. conjugens’ range. The species annual ADDRESSES: Printed copies of this habit and self-incompatible breeding Office of the Secretary recovery plan are available by request system potentially create additional from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • OFR 2018–1175: Population Genomic Surveys of Six Rare Plant Species
    Prepared in cooperation with the San Diego Association of Governments Population Genomic Surveys for Six Rare Plant Species in San Diego County, California Open-File Report 2018–1175 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photographs: Top Left: Acanthomintha ilicifolia (San Diego thornmint). Photograph by Margie Mulligan, 2016–17, San Diego County, California. Top Middle: Baccharis vanessae (Encinitas baccharis). Photograph by Jon Rebman, 2016–17, San Diego County, California. Top Right: Dicranostegia orcuttiana (Orcutt’s bird’s-beak). Photograph by Margie Mulligan, 2016–17, San Diego County, California. Bottom Left: Chloropyron maritimum ssp. maritimum (salt marsh bird’s-beak). Photograph by Margie Mulligan, 2016–17, San Diego County, California. Bottom Middle: Deinandra conjugens (Otay tarplant). Photograph by Margie Mulligan, 2016–17, San Diego County, California. Bottom Right: Monardella viminea (willowy monardella). Photograph by Margie Mulligan, 2016–17, San Diego County, California. Back: Field of Chloropyron maritimum ssp. maritimus (salt marsh bird’s-beak) at Dog Beach in Ocean Beach. Photograph by E.R. Milano, July 21, 2017, San Deigo, California. Prepared in cooperation with the San Diego Association of Governments Population Genomic Surveys of Six Rare Plant Species in San Diego County, California By Elizabeth R. Milano and Amy G. Vandergast Open-File Report 2018–1175 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747).
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Quino Recovery Plan
    DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN FOR DEINANDRA CONJUGENS (OTAY TARPLANT) December 2003 Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: ____________________________________________ DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate actions required to recover and protect federally listed plant and animal species. We (the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Recovery teams serve as independent advisors to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Draft recovery plans are published for public review and submitted to scientific peer review before we adopt them. Objectives of the recovery plan will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific recovery actions and do not necessarily represent the view, official position, or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formation other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or California/Nevada Operations Manager as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as directed by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Literature Citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Draft Recovery Plan for Deinandra conjugens (Otay Tarplant). Portland, Oregon. xi + 51 pp. An electronic version of this recovery plan will also be made available at http://pacific.fws.gov/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/default.htm and at http://endangered.fws.gov/recovery/index.html#plans.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Federal Register, 67 FR 76029
    Tuesday, December 10, 2002 Part VI Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Deinandra conjugens (Otay tarplant); Final Rule VerDate 0ct<31>2002 11:32 Dec 09, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10DER4.SGM 10DER4 76030 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2002 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR accepted by the scientific community, Information Systems (GIS) analysis, we are changing the name of Hemizonia most current and historical Deinandra Fish and Wildlife Service conjugens to Deinandra conjugens in 50 conjugens occurrences are found on clay CFR 17.12 (h), and will use Deinandra soils or lenses in one of the following 50 CFR Part 17 conjugens in this final rule. soil series: Diablo; Olivenhain; Linne; RIN 1018–AH00 Deinandra conjugens was first Salinas; Huerhuero; Auld; Bosanko; described by David D. Keck (1958) as Friant; and San Miguel-Exchequer rocky Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Hemizonia conjugens based on a silt loams (Bauder et al. 2002). and Plants; Designation of Critical specimen collected by L.R. Abrams in The occurrence of Deinandra Habitat for Deinandra conjugens (Otay 1903 from river bottom land in the Otay conjugens is also strongly associated tarplant) Valley area of San Diego County, with particular vegetation types. The California. Deinandra conjugens is a species is found in vegetation AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, glandular, aromatic annual plant in the communities classified as, but not Interior. Asteraceae. It has a branching stem that limited to, grasslands, open coastal sage ACTION: Final rule.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Secondary Border Wall Comments CBD & Partners
    January 17, 2019 Paul Enriquez Environmental Branch Chief Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure Program Management Office 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20229 Kevin K. McAleenan Commissioner - U.S. Customs and Border Protection 1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20229 Carla L. Provost Acting Chief - U.S. Border Patrol 1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20229 CC: Kirstjen M. Nielsen Secretary of Homeland Security 300 7th Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20024 Re: San Diego Secondary Wall Construction Coalition Comments Dear Mr. Enriquez, These comments on the proposed construction of 12.6 miles of “secondary bollard wall” replacement and 1.6 miles of new “secondary bollard wall” construction in the United States Border Patrol (USBP) San Diego sector are submitted on behalf of the undersigned conservation, human rights, public interest, and faith-based organizations. The construction of 30ft-high bollard-style border barriers in the locations proposed in U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP’s) December 18 notice would damage the environment and negatively impact the culture, commerce, and quality of life for communities and residents located near the project area. Similar border barrier projects have damaged and destroyed protected landscapes, interfered with binational conservation efforts, obstructed the movement of wildlife, and impacted neighboring communities. The area of proposed construction for this project spans 14 miles and is within or in close proximity to coastal wetland habitat, seasonal wetland vernal pool habitat, and other occupied endangered species habitat. This includes habitat for some of the 85 species prioritized for protection by San Diego County Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) and land protected by conservation easements and collaborative public and private sector efforts as a 1 result of the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Deinandra Conjugens), Challenges and Lessons Learned
    Translocation, Restoration and Management Methods for Otay tarplant (Deinandra conjugens), Challenges and Lessons Learned Southern California Grassland Symposium March 22, 2012 The Project Included Habitat Restoration for Otay Tarplant and Maritime Succulent Scrub, Village I Otay Ranch Wolf Canyon Restoration Areas Otay Tarplant Deinandra conjugens • Annual Species • Restricted to Southern San Diego County and Extreme Northern Baja • State and Federally Listed-USFWS Recovery Plan • Threats Include Direct Loss of Habitat Through Agricultural Conversion and • Development • Weed Invasion/Competition • Population numbers can ffffluctuate significantly from year to year Annual Population Changes in Distribution and Density can be Significant PrePre--RestorationRestoration Conditions The area was hildfheavily grazed for years prior to restoration Numerous weeds were present: Wild oats (Avena spp.) Black mustard (Brassica nigra) Tocalote-star thistle (Centaurea melitensis) Otay Ranch Village I Impacts: 0.75 acre of Otay tarplant HHabitatabitat --TheThe Impact Site SSupportedupported 500 plants Mitigation Goals and Success Criteria: Restoration of approximately three acres of disturbed habitat in Wolf Canyon for the Otayyp tarplant and establishment of a minimum of 2, 000 p lants by the end of the five-year maintenance period. A 10-year monitoring period is required as part of the translocation and restoration program. Success Criteria: 1) A replacement of 4:1 of the baseline number of plants at the donor site is achieved in at least one of the monitoring years between years 6 though 10 following the end of the intensive maintenance period; 2) No supplemental seeding of Otay tarplant has occurred for at least two growing seasons prior to the year which population counts meet success criterion 1; and 3) The population does not show a decline in years 6 through 10 unless a natural population chosen as a reference site exhibits the same pattern and magnitude of decline over those same years.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Models
    Enhancing the Resilience of Edaphic Endemic Plants: Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Local Assistance Grant P1582108-00 Prepared by: Conservation Biology Institute August 2016 Enhancing the Resilience of Edaphic Endemic Plants: Conceptual Models Table of Contents Section Page Number Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Conceptual Model Development………………………………………………………………… 2 Process……………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Structure……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Conceptual Models and Model Narratives………………………………………………………. 4 San Diego Thornmint (Acanthomintha ilicifolia)……………………………………………. 4 Thread-leaved Brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia)…………………………………………………. 5 Otay Tarplant (Deinandra conjugens)……………………………………………………… 16 Dehesa Nolina (Nolina interrata)…………………………………………………………… 16 Parry’s Tetracoccus (Tetracoccus dioicus)…………………………………………………. 21 Literature Cited………………………………………………………………………………….. 32 Figures 1 Diagram of General Conceptual Model Structure…………………………………… 4 2 Conceptual Model Diagram: San Diego Thornmint (Acanthomintha ilicifolia)……. 6 3 Conceptual Model Diagram: Thread-leaved Brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia)………... 11 4 Conceptual Model Diagram: Otay Tarplant (Deinandra conjugens)…………........ 17 5 Conceptual Model Diagram: Dehesa Nolina (Nolina interrata)…………………… 22 6 Conceptual Model Diagram: Parry's Tetracoccus (Tetracoccus dioicus)………….. 28 Tables 1 Target Species………………………………………………………………………... 2 2 Conceptual Model Narrative: San Diego Thornmint (Acanthomintha ilicifolia)…... 7 3 Conceptual Model Narrative:
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program Covered Species Prioritization
    San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program Covered Species Prioritization For Task B of Local Assistance Grant #P0450009 Source: http://www.fws.gov/sandiegorefuges/Vernal.htm January 2006 Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Game Grant Coordinator: Dr. Brenda S. Johnson Prepared by: Department of Biology, San Diego State University Dr. Helen M. Regan, Lauren A. Hierl, Dr. Janet Franklin, and Dr. Douglas H. Deutschman MSCP Covered Species Prioritization January 2006 Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Figures................................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 4 I. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 5 II. Description of Prioritization Scheme Used............................................................................. 5 i) At-Risk Category..................................................................................................................... 7 ii) Threats/Risk Factors............................................................................................................... 9 iii) Habitat Associations and Spatial Distribution of Species..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deinandra Conjugens), Challenges and Lessons Learned
    Translocation, Restoration and Management Methods for Otay tarplant (Deinandra conjugens), Challenges and Lessons Learned Southern California Grassland Symposium March 22, 2012 The Project Included Habitat Restoration for Otay Tarplant and Maritime Succulent Scrub, Village I Otay Ranch Wolf Canyon Restoration Areas Otay Tarplant Deinandra conjugens • Annual Species • Restricted to Southern San Diego County and Extreme Northern Baja • State and Federally Listed-USFWS Recovery Plan • Threats Include Direct Loss of Habitat Through Agricultural Conversion and • Development • Weed Invasion/Competition • Population numbers can fluctuate significantly from year to year Annual Population Changes in Distribution and Density can be Significant Pre-Restoration Conditions The area was heavily grazed for years prior to restoration Numerous weeds were present: Wild oats (Avena spp.) Black mustard (Brassica nigra) Tocalote-star thistle (Centaurea melitensis) Otay Ranch Village I Impacts: 0.75 acre of Otay tarplant Habitat -The Impact Site Supported 500 plants Mitigation Goals and Success Criteria: Restoration of approximately three acres of disturbed habitat in Wolf Canyon for the Otay tarplant and establishment of a minimum of 2,000 plants by the end of the five-year maintenance period. A 10-year monitoring period is required as part of the translocation and restoration program. Success Criteria: 1) A replacement of 4:1 of the baseline number of plants at the donor site is achieved in at least one of the monitoring years between years 6 though 10 following the end of the intensive maintenance period; 2) No supplemental seeding of Otay tarplant has occurred for at least two growing seasons prior to the year which population counts meet success criterion 1; and 3) The population does not show a decline in years 6 through 10 unless a natural population chosen as a reference site exhibits the same pattern and magnitude of decline over those same years.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving North America's Threatened Plants
    Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Andrea Kramer, Abby Hird, Kirsty Shaw, Michael Dosmann, and Ray Mims January 2011 Recommended ciTaTion: Kramer, A., A. Hird, K. Shaw, M. Dosmann, and R. Mims. 2011. Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants: Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation . BoTanic Gardens ConservaTion InTernaTional U.S. Published by BoTanic Gardens ConservaTion InTernaTional U.S. 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, IL 60022 USA www.bgci.org/usa Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Contents Acknowledgements . .3 Foreword . .4 Executive Summary . .5 Chapter 1. The North American Flora . .6 1.1 North America’s plant diversity . .7 1.2 Threats to North America’s plant diversity . .7 1.3 Conservation status and protection of North America’s plants . .8 1.3.1 Regional conservaTion sTaTus and naTional proTecTion . .9 1.3.2 Global conservaTion sTaTus and proTecTion . .10 1.4 Integrated plant conservation . .11 1.4.1 In situ conservaTion . .11 1.4.2 Ex situ collecTions and conservaTion applicaTions . .12 1.4.3 ParameTers of ex situ collecTions for conservaTion . .16 1.5 Global perspective and work on ex situ conservation . .18 1.5.1 Global STraTegy for PlanT ConservaTion, TargeT 8 . .18 Chapter 2. North American Collections Assessment . .19 2.1 Background . .19 2.2 Methodology . .19 2.2.1 Compiling lisTs of ThreaTened NorTh American Taxa .
    [Show full text]