EHA Magazine Vol.1 No.6 March 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Environmental Impact of Building Dams Aswan Dam the Aswan Dam, Built on the Nile River, Was an Enormous Feat of Engineering and Planning
The Environmental Impact of Building Dams Aswan Dam The Aswan dam, built on the Nile River, was an enormous feat of engineering and planning. Lake Nasser was created as a result of the ooding of the dam’s catchment area. Some important cultural heritage sites were taken apart, and rebuilt at Abu Simbel in order to avoid them being ooded by the project. Other sites were not saved and remain under the water. The Gordon Dam Gordon River in Tasmania, Australia. Built in 1974 The Gordon Dam was built for the purpose of providing hydroelectric supply. Water is fed down a 183 m drop to turn turbines that are located under the ground below the dam wall. A proposed second dam on the Gordon River, the Franklin Dam, was never built due to strong opposition from community and environmental groups. The Tasmanian Wilderness Society ran a campaign from 1976 -1983 to save the pristine wilderness from environmental damage. The leader of the Tasmanian Wilderness Society, Dr Bob Brown, later became a member of the Tasmanian Parliament, an Australian Senator and the Parliamentary Leader of the Australian Greens political party. Murray River The Murray River ows for over 2500 km across eastern Australia to its outlet on the coast in South Australia. It forms part of the border between New South Wales and Victoria. During the early to mid 1900s, a series of dams, locks and weirs were built on the river. These disrupted the natural ow of the river and allowed fresh water to be available for irrigation to Australia’s largest food growing region. -
2006 ASTC Booklet
2006 Australian Schools Teams Chess Championship Canberra, 11-12 Dec Proudly Supported by - Welcome to the 2006 ASTC Efbs!qmbzfst-!qbsfout-!ufbdifst-!dpbdift!boe!wjtjupst- Po!cfibmg!pg!uif!BDU!Kvojps!Diftt!Mfbhvf!)BDUKDM*!J!xfmdpnf!zpv!up!Dbocfssb! boe!up!uif!3117!Bvtusbmjbo!Tdippmt!Ufbnt!Diftt!Dibnqjpotijq-!boe! dpohsbuvmbuf!zpv!po!zpvs!bdijfwfnfou!jo!kvtu!rvbmjgzjoh!gps!uijt!fwfou/!!Xf!xjti! zpv!fwfsz!tvddftt!pwfs!uif!uxp!ebzt!pg!dpnqfujujpo" Uif!BTUD!jt!uif!gjstu!fwfou!pg!uif!P3D!Bvtusbmjbo!Gftujwbm!pg!Kvojps!Diftt!.!xf! ipqf!up!tff!nboz!pg!zpv!sfuvso!jo!Kbovbsz!gps!uif!3118!Bvtusbmjbo!Kvojps! Dibnqjpotijq!xifsf!zpv!xjmm!ibwf!bopuifs!pqqpsuvojuz!gps!tpnf!hsfbu!diftt!bt! xfmm!bt!fokpz!b!mjuumf!pg!xibu!zpvs!obujpobm!dbqjubm!ibt!up!pggfs/ J!xpvme!mjlf!up!ublf!uijt!pqqpsuvojuz!up!uibol!pvs!tqpotpst!bdsptt!uif!xipmf!pg! uif!Gftujwbm!bt!xfmm!bt!uiptf!xip!ibwf!tqfdjgjdbmmz!dpnf!po!cpbse!up!tvqqpsu!uif! BTUD/!!Xf!ibwf!cffo!gpsuvobuf!up!fokpz!hfofspvt!tvqqpsu!gspn!pvs!dpnnvojuz! boe!fwfsz!tqpotpstijq-!fwfsz!epobujpo-!mbshf!ps!tnbmm-!jt!dpousjcvujoh!up!b!sfbmmz! gboubtujd!fyqfsjfodf!gps!pvs!qbsujdjqbout!.!UIBOL!ZPV" J!bmtp!xbou!up!bdlopxmfehf!uif!pvutuboejoh!hspvq!pg!wpmvouffst!xf!ibwf!jo!uif! BDU!'!Bvtusbmjbo!diftt!dpnnvojuz!xip!ibwf!nbef!uijt!bmm!ibqqfo/!!Xf!ibwf! upp!nboz!up!obnf!uifn!bmm!)boe!J!uibol-!jo!boujdjqbujpo-!fwfszpof!ifmqjoh!pwfs! uif!dpvstf!pg!uif!ofyu!uxp!ebzt*!cvu!tqfdjbm!uibolt!hp!up!. ! Tibvo!Qsftt!'!Dibsmft![xpsftujof!.!pvs!bscjufst ! Ups!Mbuujnpsf!.!gps!ijt!xpsl!po!uif!xfctjuf ! Kfooz!Xjmljotpo!.!gps!bmm!nboofs!pg!uijoht!cvu!nptumz!gps!jotjtujoh!J!! -
Implications for Tasmanian Electricity System of The
Backroad Connections Pty Ltd ABN: 64 090 245 382 [email protected] (0407) 486-651 www.backroad.com.au Implications for the Tasmanian electricity system of the proposal to restore Lake Pedder July 2019 Overview The paper analyses the implication for the Tasmanian electricity system of the proposal by the Lake Pedder Restoration Committee (LPRC) to restore the original Lake Pedder. It provides information on the current contribution of the Gordon Scheme to Tasmanian electricity generation and energy storage and provides some information and estimates on alternatives to replace this generation if the original Lake Pedder was restored. Background The original Lake Pedder was flooded in 1972 as part of an expansion of the Tasmanian hydro-electric scheme. The flooded area created is still officially known as Lake Pedder although the LPRC prefer the name Huon- Serpentine Impoundment. In this paper we will use the term ‘new Lake Pedder’. The new Lake Pedder at 242 sq km is vastly bigger than the original Lake Pedder at 10 sq km. The new Lake Pedder does not have its own hydro-electric generation. Its purpose is to trap and raise the level of the water that would otherwise flow down the Huon and Serpentine rivers. The water is raised to the level where it flows through a channel created at McPartlan Pass into the Gordon Dam and contributes to the storage and generation of the Gordon Scheme. As a result the level of the new Lake Pedder does not vary more than a few metres. This makes it more visually attractive and more suitable for recreational use than the adjacent Gordon Reservoir. -
2011 Annual Report
directors’ statement To the Honourable Bryan Green, MHA, Minister for Energy and Resources, in compliance with requirements of the Government Business Enterprises Act 1995. In accordance with Section 55 of the Government Business Enterprises Act 1995, we hereby submit for your information and presentation to Parliament the report of the Hydro-Electric Corporation for the year ended 30 June 2011. The report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Government Business Enterprises Act 1995. David Crean Chairman Hydro-Electric Corporation October 2011 Roy Adair CEO Hydro-Electric Corporation October 2011 Hydro-Electric Corporation ARBN 072 377 158 ABN 48 072 377 158 contents page 1 Our vision: Introduction 3 About this report 5 Australia’s leading clean About Hydro Tasmania 8 energy business, inspiring Achievements and challenges 2010-2011 10 Progress against 2010 commitments 11 pride and building value for Chairman’s review 12 our owners, our customers CEO’s report 15 and our people Statement of corporate intent 18 Independent assurance statement 21 Annual Report 2011 Tasmania Hydro Performance 25 Sustainability 27 Our values: Economic performance 30 Momentum 36 • We put people’s health Entura 38 and safety first Roaring 40s 41 Assets and resource use 43 • We always behave with Governance 49 The Board 52 honesty and integrity Executives 55 • We work together, People 57 respect each other and Employees 59 External stakeholders 66 value our diversity Environment 73 • We strive to deliver Ecosystems and heritage 75 Financial -
YARRALUMLA 2 Brochure
1 1 d d n i . ] 2 2].indd a l m u l a r r a y [ [yarralumla 6 0 0 2 - 0 1 - T N NT-10-2006 M P PM 4 4 : 3 2 : 0 1 10:23:44 6 0 / 0 1 / 4 2 24/10/06 • • Scrivener Dam Scrivener Courtesy of the ACT Heritage Library, Department of the Capital Territory Collection. Territory Capital the of Department Library, Heritage ACT the of Courtesy (design) Brainstorm Studio • (research) Dowling Peter Dr The publishers wish to acknowledge: to wish publishers The • • Yarralumla Woolshed Yarralumla Collection. Library, Heritage ACT the of Courtesy Canberra Times Canberra • • Government House Government Courtesy of the ACT Heritage Library, ACT Administration Collection. Administration ACT Library, Heritage ACT the of Courtesy www.act.nationaltrust.org.au 0533 6230 02 Civic Square ACT 2608 ACT Square Civic 1144 Box PO Contact: National Trust of Australia (ACT) Australia of Trust National Contact: © Copyright 2007 ACT Government ACT 2007 Copyright © with the assistance of the ACT Government. ACT the of assistance the with National Trust of Australia (ACT) Australia of Trust National This tour has been developed by the the by developed been has tour This A SELF-GUIDED TOUR SELF-GUIDED A TOUR 2 of 2 of 2 TOUR 10. Dam 10. Scrivener 9. House 9. Government 8. Woolshed 8. Yarralumla 7. (Westlake) Park 7. Stirling 6. Streets 6. Yarralumla YARRALUMLA 5. Housing 5. Yarralumla 4. Precinct Forestry 4. CSIRO 3. Brickworks 3. Yarralumla A heritage tour of tour heritage A 2. Incinerator 2. Canberra 1. -
Hydro Tasmania 4 Elizabeth Street Hobart TAS 7000
Certificate of Registration ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - ISO 14001:2015 This is to certify that: Hydro Tasmania 4 Elizabeth Street Hobart TAS 7000 Holds Certificate Number: EMS 603522 and operates an Environmental Management System which complies with the requirements of ISO 14001:2015 for the following scope: Operation, maintenance and management of electricity generation facilities including power stations (hydroelectric, solar, diesel and wind), distribution network, associated lakes and waterways. For and on behalf of BSI: Chris Cheung, Head of Compliance & Risk - Asia Pacific Original Registration Date: 1998-05-15 Effective Date: 2018-11-12 Latest Revision Date: 2018-11-16 Expiry Date: 2021-11-28 Page: 1 of 3 This certificate was issued electronically and remains the property of BSI Group ANZ Pty Limited, ACN 078 659 211 and is bound by the conditions of contract. This certificate can be verified at www.bsi-global.com/clientdirectory. Printed copies can be validated at www.bsi-global.com/ClientDirectory. Further clarifications regarding the scope of this certificate and the applicability of ISO 14001:2015 requirements may be obtained by consulting the organization. This certificate is valid only if provided original copies are in complete set. Information and Contact: BSI, Kitemark Court, Davy Avenue, Knowlhill, Milton Keynes MK5 8PP. Tel: + 44 345 080 9000 BSI Assurance UK Limited, registered in England under number 7805321 at 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL, UK. Information and Contact: BSI Group ANZ Pty Limited, ACN 078 659 211: Suite 2, Level 7, 15 Talavera Road, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113 A Member of the BSI Group of Companies. -
3966 Tour Op 4Col
The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places, -
A Review of Geoconservation Values
Geoconservation Values of the TWWHA and Adjacent Areas 3.0 GEOCONSERVATION AND GEOHERITAGE VALUES OF THE TWWHA AND ADJACENT AREAS 3.1 Introduction This section provides an assessment of the geoconservation (geoheritage) values of the TWWHA, with particular emphasis on the identification of geoconservation values of World Heritage significance. This assessment is based on: • a review (Section 2.3.2) of the geoconservation values cited in the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989); • a review of relevant new scientific data that has become available since 1989 (Section 2.4); and: • the use of contemporary procedures for rigorous justification of geoconservation significance (see Section 2.2) in terms of the updated World Heritage Criteria (UNESCO 1999; see this report Section 2.3.3). In general, this review indicates that the major geoconservation World Heritage values of the TWWHA identified in 1989 are robust and remain valid. However, only a handful of individual sites or features in the TWWHA are considered to have World Heritage value in their own right, as physical features considered in isolation (eg, Exit Cave). In general it is the diversity, extent and inter-relationships between numerous features, sites, areas or processes that gives World Heritage significance to certain geoheritage “themes” in the TWWHA (eg, the "Ongoing Natural Geomorphic and Soil Process Systems" and “Late Cainozoic "Ice Ages" and Climate Change Record” themes). This "wholistic" principle under-pinned the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989, p. 27; see this report Section 2.3.2), and is strongly supported by the present review (see discussion and justification of this principle in Section 2.2). -
The Works Approval Process
3 The works approval process Introduction 3.1 This chapter outlines the steps that Immigration Bridge Australia (IBA) would be required to follow in seeking consideration under the National Capital Authority (NCA) administered works approval process. Further discussion on whether the assessment of the bridge proposal may be required under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (the EPBC Act) is included. Indicative timelines for these assessments are also discussed. Particular focus is given to the consultation that would be required to accompany the proposal under each process. Lastly, the maintenance of gifting assets is discussed. Background 3.2 Designated Areas categorised under the National Capital Plan (NCP) embody the special characteristics of the national capital and so are preserved and enhanced in accordance with their character. 3.3 Further, under the requirements of the Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988 (Cwlth) (the PALM Act), any works in a Designated Area are subject to approval by the NCA. 3.4 As the suggested location for the proposed bridge lies within a Designated Area, it is subject to the NCA administered works approval process. 3.5 In addition, as the proposed bridge may have a significant impact on Commonwealth land, it may also be subject to an additional assessment 34 INQUIRY INTO THE IMMIGRATION BRIDGE PROPOSAL by the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA) under the EPBC Act. 3.6 Assessment of the IBA proposal through -
Strategic Review of Recreational Facilities Around Lake Burley Griffin Final Report
STRATEGIC REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AROUND LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR ACT ROWING STRATEGIC REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AROUND LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN - FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR ACT ROWING PAGE 2 OF 75 | CB RICHARD ELLIS (V) PTY LTD | CANBERRA | NOVEMBER 10 | MID 182439 STRATEGIC REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AROUND LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN - FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR ACT ROWING Table of Contents Table of Figures EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 FIGURE 1 – LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN WITHIN A LOCAL CONTEXT FIGURE 2 - WALTER BURLEY GRIFFIN'S LAKE 1 INTRODUCTION 5 FIGURE 3 - WATER DEPTHS ACROSS LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN 2 LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN 6 FIGURE 4 - THE DIFFERENT CHARACTERS OF THE LAKE - YARRALUMLA BEACH 3 METHODOLOGY 10 FIGURE 5 - THE DIFFERENT CHARACTERS OF THE LAKE - COMMONWEALTH PLACE FIGURE 6 - LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN IN AN ACT CONTEXT 4 RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES ON AND AROUND LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN 11 FIGURE 7 - MURRAY COD AND LATHAMS/JAPANESE SNIPE 5 CONSULTATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS 12 FIGURE 8 - METHODOLOGY FIGURE 9- MAIN SHARED RECREATIONAL PATHS AROUND THE LAKE (IN BLUE) 6 KEY THEMES IDENTIFIED FROM CONSULTATION 13 FIGURE 10 - 2008 BICYCLE TRAFFIC COUNTS 7 IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING FACILITIES 15 FIGURE 11 - NARROW PATH AT LENNOX GARDENS 8 OPTIONS TO ADDRESS PROPOSED ACTIONS 26 FIGURE 12 - DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES (NCA) FIGURE 13 - TOILETS AT LOTUS BAY 9 CONCLUSION 36 FIGURE 14 - PICNIC FACILITIES - LENNOX GARDENS APPENDIX 1 – SUMMARY OF RELEVANT POLICY DOCUMENTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RECREATIONAL FIGURE 15 - -
Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania's Wilderness World
Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area Ecotourism Investment Profile Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area: Ecotourism Investment Profile This report was commissioned by Tourism Industry Council Tasmania and the Cradle Coast Authority, in partnership with the Tasmanian Government through Tourism Tasmania and the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service. This report is co-funded by the Australian Government under the Tourism Industry Regional Development Fund Grants Programme. This report has been prepared by EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania. Date prepared: June 2014 Design by Halibut Creative Collective. Disclaimer The information and recommendations provided in this report are made on the basis of information available at the time of preparation. While all care has been taken to check and validate material presented in this report, independent research should be undertaken before any action or decision is taken on the basis of material contained in this report. This report does not seek to provide any assurance of project viability and EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania accept no liability for decisions made or the information provided in this report. Cover photo: Huon Pine Walk Corinna The Tarkine - Rob Burnett & Tourism Tasmania Contents Background...............................................................2 Reimagining the Visitor Experience of the TWWHA .................................................................5 -
Davie.~S~~L - • 28/95
672001 01 - 4566 Final Year Report· EL 28/1995 Davies Hill 001 Wray-Mccann R' 14 JUN 2 Wray-Mccann, R. EL2811995 ~ TASMANI!' DAVIE.~S~~L - • 28/95 FINAL YEAR REPORT MINERAl RESOURCES FILE REF: R S?I\ 1 4 JUN ]001 1-,-... (0 DOC. REf: R. H. Wray-McCann OFFICER FOR FOR on ACTION ...0 I 0> (0 0> , -~\ k~ ~ .~ ~ '"> June 200} ~ ~ 0 w LO on 0> 0> ~ ~ '"--J RESUBUIT - W 1 I TO ''',. , "8. C: Ii ~ c C a: c c :;; g~ g~ ~ C> >- ::;::; ;;; >.>. c e e u: ;:;: 672002 ., ,"J .. r.~ .j::: I, '.' , J "-.~---'--------- 11.1 , ' o ~--:,, e, -, .> t i '. I, ., , .," I ., 'J ,- ;,.1 , • ,'. : .' ;-", ,, !" . C·<,,~, ,. - , \ i 110' :.;/1'.- ~ .. ~ .~ , .j ~ I ~,t' • , . " , !, .. ~, , , I,.;._ ;"" ". -' ".._. ',", x.: - 8J '. ......., ./ \ Scm I.... ~I 672C03 INDEX: INTRODUCTION EXPLORATION AIMS EXPLORATION PHILOSOPHY EXPLORATION REVIEW 1995-1997,1998-2001 EXPLORATION SUMMARY EXPLORATION ABSTRACT THE PALEOZOIC TASMANIAN WITWATERSRAND EXPLORATION IMPLICATIONS EXPLORATION RATIONALES. THE RIGHT MODEL. EXPLORATION SPINOFFS: A BIRD'S EYE X-RAY VIEW OF THE LITHOSPHERE EXPENDITURE ENDNOTES PLAIN AND SIMPLE PROSPECTING 672C04 INTRODUCTION In compiling this fifth and final year exploration report, right from the bloody outset I warn the Crown, and all who wade through it, not to expect an orthodox report. I am not prepared to diligently compile hundreds ofpages ofelaborate mineral exploration obfuscations, in order to conceal, a lack ofexploration success. The report is an itemised account ofsix years ofMount Read Volcanics and Tasmanian wide, mineral exploration research, written in a loose handed and first person narrative, as compiled by a prospector under no illusions ofits authenticity and veracity. I work by myselfand I am in no doubt of it.