Medical Care

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Medical Care MEDICAL CARE Medical care and evacuations effectively treated a massive and overwhelming evacuee population. Federalized teams of medical fi rst responders suffered from a lack of advance were deployed to the affected region to provide assistance. preparations, inadequate Millions of dollars worth of medical supplies and assets communications, and diffi culties were consumed. Some Department of Health and Human coordinating efforts Services (HHS) assets, like the Federal Medical Shelters, had never been used or tested prior to Katrina but were deployed and were, for the most part, considered effective. Summary Despite diffi culties, the medical assistance and response to Hurricane Katrina was a success. Thousands Public health preparedness and medical of lives were saved because of the hard work and enduring assistance are critical components to any disaster efforts of public health offi cials and medical volunteers. response plan Poor planning and preparedness, however, were also too big a part of the story, resulting in delays and shortages of Hurricane Katrina tested the nation’s planning and resources, and loss of life in the region. preparedness for a major public health threat and This chapter outlines what medical personnel and highlighted the importance of strong cooperation supplies were pre-positioned, and deployed post-landfall, and partnerships among health agencies at all levels to the affected area and how those assets were utilized. of government. The threat of any type of disaster It explains the plans in place prior to Hurricane Katrina emphasizes the need for planning and practice. Public for health care facilities and shelters. The fi ndings in this health preparedness and medical assistance are critical chapter conclude several defi ciencies in public health and components to any disaster response plan — the faster medical response plans exist at all levels of government the health community responds, the more quickly control and within medical care facilities. Ultimately, better strategies can be developed and appropriate treatments can planning and initiative would have resulted in a more be identifi ed. And the faster human suffering is diminished. proactive, coordinated, effi cient, and effective response. The annual hurricane season is a continuous challenge to public health infrastructures and a strain on Personnel resources. As seen in the preparation for and response to Katrina, medical personnel, supplies, and equipment HHS and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) were in constant need in the Gulf coast region. Despite have the capabilities to mobilize and deploy teams of defi ciencies in coordination, communication, and medical personnel to disaster areas. HHS controls the capacity, public health and medical support services Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, the Medical Reserves Corps, and personnel from its agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and the Food and Drug Administration. DHS, specifi cally FEMA, has direct control over the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS), which supplies and organizes teams of medical personnel in each state who stand ready to deploy at any moment. Unfortunately, limited numbers of personnel were pre-positioned prior to landfall, and most deployments were delayed until after the storm hit and the magnitude of devastation was realized. FEMA A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE 267 Supplies by Hurricane Katrina. Nor does it include every detail of the communications and coordination diffi culties which In addition to medical personnel, HHS, FEMA, and the impeded the medical response. Department of Defense (DOD) have medical supplies at Rather, this chapter provides fi ndings based on an their disposal to respond to a public health emergency. in-depth examination of specifi c plans in place before the HHS has control over the Strategic National Stockpile storm, and a timeline of events that actually took place (SNS), a national repository of pharmaceuticals and after the storm. Similarly, the Select Committee recognizes medical supplies. NDMS personnel teams are always this section of the report focuses on the evacuations of accompanied by large caches of supplies and drugs. DOD New Orleans medical facilities in particular. Because New has a mobile medical unit capability as well. Limited Orleans hospitals and facilities experienced the most amounts of supplies, however, were staged in the region complete failure of equipment and communications, prior to landfall. Several offi cials argued the magnitude and because the need to evacuate New Orleans hospital of the storm’s devastation could not have been predicted, patients was so extreme, the Select Committee chose these and the amount of supplies needed was unknown until institutions as its focal point. the fog cleared. Despite that argument, more supplies and personnel could have been pre-positioned prior to landfall. Evacuations As it stands, Louisiana hospitals and nursing homes are responsible for having and implementing their own emergency evacuation plans. The Louisiana Hospital Association (LHA) does not provide specifi c emergency response or evacuation guidance and said, with respect to protecting patients and staff, the primary priority for all hospitals is to “shelter in place” versus evacuate. Hospitals are, however, expected to comply with requirements set forth by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.2 The majority of hospital CEOs, as well as state and local medical personnel with whom the Select Committee met, cited time and money as two key factors infl uencing AP PHOTO/BILL HABER their decision about whether to evacuate patients from a shelter or medical facility prior to a hurricane. Time is Evacuation plans, communication, critical given that the majority of hospital and Department and coordination must be executed well of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) plans call for for effective response evacuation decisions to be made anywhere from 36 to 72 hours in advance of a hurricane’s projected landfall During the days following Hurricane Katrina, around the — hospitalized patients require a signifi cant amount of clock media coverage of patients and staff trapped in New time and staff to be moved safely. In the case of Hurricane Orleans hospitals inundated television screens across the Katrina, the then Methodist Hospital CEO, Larry Graham, country. The nation watched in horror. How long would said when he realized Hurricane Katrina was going to it take for evacuations to begin? And why had these hit New Orleans, there simply was not enough time to hospitals not evacuated before the storm? evacuate patients. The Select Committee focused part of its medical The second much-discussed factor, cost, is perhaps investigation on these questions, as well as the even more critical to the decision. Expenses for evacuating overarching issues of impaired communications and lack a hospital are astronomical, and in the case of for-profi t of coordination. The Select Committee acknowledges this hospitals, these costs are not reimbursable by FEMA. In chapter does not tell the story of every hospital devastated 268 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Time is critical given that the majority of hospital and Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) plans call for evacuation decisions to be made anywhere from 36 to 72 hours in advance of a hurricane’s projected landfall most cases hospitals say that given their cost/risk analyses, One of the most common and pervasive themes in it makes the most economic sense to ride out a storm and the response to Hurricane Katrina has been a systematic protect patients within the hospital rather than evacuate failure of communications at the local, state, and federal them. For example, going to Code Grey alone (without levels — a failure that hindered initiative. The accounts factoring in evacuation expenses), costs Louisiana State of New Orleans medical facilities and special needs University’s hospitals $600,000 per day.3 Many members shelters are no exception, underscoring how failed of the New Orleans medical community likewise made communications with the outside threatened the safety of the point, had Hurricane Katrina not resulted in such medical staff and the lives of their patients. It was diffi cult catastrophic fl ooding, their facilities would have been to ascertain a clear timeline of communication capabilities prepared, and their decision not to evacuate patients and failures for medical fi rst responders and personnel. would have been the most prudent course of action. With Institutions did not have time to collect information the factors of time and money in mind, this chapter seeks for hourly or even daily reports of how communication to understand evacuation plans in place prior to Katrina, equipment and systems were working or not. Medical and preparedness levels of hospitals and the government responders and personnel simply did not have adequate to fully evacuate New Orleans medical facilities. communications capabilities immediately following the hurricane. The majority of cell phones were rendered Communication and Coordination inoperable because they could not be recharged. Satellite communications were unreliable, and the distribution of Medical responders and coordinating offi cers from the satellite phones appeared insuffi cient. government, hospitals, and private entities, cited non- Government agencies also encountered
Recommended publications
  • A FAILURE of INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina
    A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina U.S. House of Representatives 4 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Union Calendar No. 00 109th Congress Report 2nd Session 000-000 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Report by the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoacess.gov/congress/index.html February 15, 2006. — Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U. S. GOVERNMEN T PRINTING OFFICE Keeping America Informed I www.gpo.gov WASHINGTON 2 0 0 6 23950 PDF For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COVER PHOTO: FEMA, BACKGROUND PHOTO: NASA SELECT BIPARTISAN COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE PREPARATION FOR AND RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA TOM DAVIS, (VA) Chairman HAROLD ROGERS (KY) CHRISTOPHER SHAYS (CT) HENRY BONILLA (TX) STEVE BUYER (IN) SUE MYRICK (NC) MAC THORNBERRY (TX) KAY GRANGER (TX) CHARLES W. “CHIP” PICKERING (MS) BILL SHUSTER (PA) JEFF MILLER (FL) Members who participated at the invitation of the Select Committee CHARLIE MELANCON (LA) GENE TAYLOR (MS) WILLIAM J.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Health Update #58
    UN Health Update #58 Multilateral Consulting, LLC November 1, 2017 UN HEALTH UPDATE #58 NOVEMBER 1, 2017 Table of Contents WHO Breaks Precedent with New Leadership Team ............................................... 1 Female majority, inclusion of conservatives in line-up WIPO Showcases Agency’s Work, Highlights IFPMA Project .................................. 5 At Assemblies: committees report, "Pat-INFORMED" presented “Montevideo Roadmap” Issued by Leaders at WHO NCD Confab .......................... 8 High-level attendance at October Uruguay meeting WHO Establishes High-Level NCD Commission ..................................................... 9 Headed by Sania Nishtar, will include Peruvian president WHO Issues GCM/NCD Progress Report ............................................................... 9 Aims to achieve Global Monitoring Framework's 9 targets WHO EURO, LSE Scholars: Hurdles are Prices, IP ............................................... 10 Slams failure to implement HLP recommencations, including "punishment' Comments Submitted on WHO GPW 2019-2023 ................................................... 10 Lays out D-G's vision and priorities; NGOs make suggestions PAHO Elects Carissa Etienne to 2nd Term .............................................................. 12 Directing Council takes up usual list of topics Regional Director Presides Over First/Last EMRO Meeting .................................. 12 Ministers debate range of pressing challenges WPRO Takes Up Broad Range of Issues ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisitions, and Policy Implementation Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL33907 Project BioShield: Appropriations, Acquisitions, and Policy Implementation Issues for Congress March 8, 2007 Frank Gottron Specialist in Science and Technology Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Project BioShield: Appropriations, Acquisitions, and Policy Implementation Issues for Congress Summary The Project BioShield Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-276) established a 10-year program to acquire civilian medical countermeasures to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) agents for the Strategic National Stockpile. Provisions of this act were designed to encourage private companies to develop these countermeasures by guaranteeing a government market for successfully developed countermeasures. Both the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have responsibilities in this program. Funds for this program are appropriated to DHS, while contracts are executed through HHS. The interagency process responsible for deciding which countermeasures to procure has changed multiple times since this program’s inception. The Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2004 (P.L. 108-90) provided an advance appropriation of $5.6 billion to acquire CBRN countermeasures over a 10- year period (FY2004–FY2013). This act also limited the amount that could be obligated during specified time periods. The Project BioShield Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-276) assigned the $5.6 billion advance appropriation to Project BioShield countermeasure acquisitions. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004 (P.L. 108- 199) and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (P.L. 108-447) reduced the total amount available for Project BioShield by a total of $25 million. Congress retains the power to make additional appropriations and rescissions to this account.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Influenza Pandemic May Expand the Military Role in Disaster Relief
    USAWC STRATEGY RESEARCH PROJECT AVIAN INFLUENZA PANDEMIC MAY EXPAND THE MILITARY ROLE IN DISASTER RELIEF by Colonel Frank William Sherod II United States Army Colonel Dallas C. Hack Project Adviser This SRP is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Strategic Studies Degree. The U.S. Army War College is accredited by the Commission on Higher Education of the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools, 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, (215) 662-5606. The Commission on Higher Education is an institutional accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. The views expressed in this student academic research paper are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. U.S. Army War College CARLISLE BARRACKS, PENNSYLVANIA 17013 Form Approved Report Documentation Page OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
    [Show full text]
  • It's Getting Ugly out There
    It’s Getting Ugly Out There The Frauds, Bunglers, Liars, and Losers Who Are Hurting America JACK CAFFERTY John Wiley & Sons, Inc. It’s Getting Ugly Out There It’s Getting Ugly Out There The Frauds, Bunglers, Liars, and Losers Who Are Hurting America JACK CAFFERTY John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright © 2007 by Jack Cafferty. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada Design and composition by Navta Associates, Inc. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copy- right Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and the author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically dis- claim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Preparedness: Pandemic Planning in the Bush Administration
    SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW REFLECTIONS ON PREPAREDNESS: PANDEMIC PLANNING IN THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION STEWART SIMONSON* I. INTRODUCTION It may seem hard to believe today, but there was a time when pandemic influenza was not a subject of much interest anywhere outside of public health agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Indeed, the whole history of influenza preparedness can be summarized as decades of inactivity followed by months of anxiety and years of second-guessing. If the recent criticism of the World Health Organization (WHO) is any indication, H1N1 seems to be following this pattern.1 It is almost as if Santayana had influenza in mind when he observed that “[t]hose who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”2 And influenza has quite a past.3 The 1918 pandemic was the most lethal plague in human history—killing between fifty million and one hundred million people worldwide in a matter of months.4 If we are to avoid this magnitude of devastation from occurring again, we must learn from our experience with influenza. My analysis of the facts and my experience working on pandemic preparedness has taught me the following lessons: * Former Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Currently, Vice President, SRA International, Inc. in Washington, DC. Special thanks to Greg Folkers, Stuart Nightingale, James LeDuc, Ladd Wiley, and Claudia Simonson for their helpful comments. 1. See Robert Roos, Who Says H1N1 Pandemic is Over, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Views of Rep. Charlie Melancon Rep
    UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SELECT BIPARTISAN COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE PREPARATION FOR AND RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA FEBRUARY 12, 2006 ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF REP. CHARLIE MELANCON REP. WILLIAM J. JEFFERSON ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF REPS. MELANCON AND JEFFERSON TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................1 I. COMMENTS ON MAJORITY VIEWS .................................................................................................4 A. National Guard Performance .........................................................................................5 B. FEMA’s “Broken” Logistics System .............................................................................7 C. Contracting Problems.....................................................................................................7 D. Ineffective Law and Order ...........................................................................................10 E. Success of Overall Evacuations....................................................................................11 F. Inadequate Housing and Community Rebuilding.........................................................12 G. Cause of Levee Failures...............................................................................................13 H. Environmental Issues ...................................................................................................14 I. Investigation Overview.................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Shadow of 9/11: America's Response to Terrorism
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Corporation View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. THE LONG SHADOW OF 9/11 AMERICA’S RESPONSE TO TERRORISM Brian Michael Jenkins and John Paul Godges EDITORS James Dobbins, Arturo Muñoz, Seth G.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Bioshield: Linking Bioterrorism Threats and Countermeasure Procurement to Enhance Terrorism Preparedness
    PROJECT BIOSHIELD: LINKING BIOTERRORISM THREATS AND COUNTERMEASURE PROCUREMENT TO ENHANCE TERRORISM PREPAREDNESS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 12, 2005 Serial No. 109–29 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 27–217 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY CHRISTOPHER COX, California, Chairman DON YOUNG, Alaska BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas LORETTA SANCHEZ, California CURT WELDON, Pennsylvania EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington PETER T. KING, New York JANE HARMAN, California JOHN LINDER, Georgia PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana NITA M. LOWEY, New York TOM DAVIS, Virginia ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California Columbia JIM GIBBONS, Nevada ZOE LOFGREN, California ROB SIMMONS, Connecticut SHEILA JACKSON-LEE, Texas MIKE ROGERS, Alabama BILL PASCRELL, JR., New Jersey STEVAN PEARCE, New Mexico DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN, U.S. Virgin Islands KATHERINE HARRIS, Florida BOB ETHERIDGE, North Carolina BOBBY JINDAL, Louisiana JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island DAVE G. REICHERT, Washington KENDRICK B. MEEK, Florida MICHAEL MCCAUL, Texas CHARLIE DENT, Pennsylvania SUBCOMMITTE ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY PETER T. KING, New York Chairman LAMAR S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Katrina: a Nation Still Unprepared
    109th Congress SPECIAL REPORT S. Rept. 109-322 2nd Session HURRICANE KATRINA: A NATION STILL UNPREPARED SPECIAL REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS Printed for the Use of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Aff airs http://hsgac.senate.gov/ ORDERED TO BE PRINTED U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2006 FOR SALE BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS Cover Photo: Helicopter Rescue, New Orleans (Courtesy of U.S. Coast Guard) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ISBN 0-16-076749-0 Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Aff airs SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio CARL LEVIN, Michigan NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii TOM COBURN, M.D., Oklahoma THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island MARK DAYTON, Minnesota ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah FRANK LAUTENBERG, New Jersey PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico MARK PRYOR, Arkansas JOHN W. WARNER, Virginia Michael D. Bopp, Majority Staff Director and Chief Counsel David T. Flanagan, Majority General Counsel, Katrina Investigation Joyce A. Rechtschaff en, Minority Staff Director and Counsel Laurie R. Rubenstein, Minority Chief Counsel Robert F. Muse, Minority General Counsel, Katrina Investigation Trina Driessnack Tyrer, Chief Clerk Majority Staff Minority Staff Arthur W Adelberg, Senior Counsel Michael L. Alexander, Professional Staff Member* Melvin D. Albritton, Counsel Alistair F.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Bioshield: Appropriations, Acquisitions, and Policy Implementation Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL33907 Project BioShield: Appropriations, Acquisitions, and Policy Implementation Issues for Congress Updated June 11, 2007 Frank Gottron Specialist in Science and Technology Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Project BioShield: Appropriations, Acquisitions, and Policy Implementation Issues for Congress Summary The Project BioShield Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-276) established a 10-year program to acquire civilian medical countermeasures to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) agents for the Strategic National Stockpile. Provisions of this act were designed to encourage private companies to develop these countermeasures by guaranteeing a government market for successfully developed countermeasures. Congress has expressed concern about the implementation of Project BioShield. It has held multiple oversight hearings and considered several pieces of legislation to improve the execution of this program, including the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (P.L. 109-417), H.R. 1089, and H.R. 1684. Stakeholders and policymakers have criticized specific contract award decisions and the rate at which they are made. Additionally, contract awards reported by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) do not directly correspond with figures provided in the President’s annual budget documents, which may suggest problems with interagency coordination and communication. Both the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and HHS have responsibilities in this program. Funds for this program are appropriated to DHS, while contracts are executed through HHS. The interagency process responsible for deciding which countermeasures to procure has changed multiple times since this program’s inception. The Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2004 (P.L. 108-90) provided an advance appropriation of $5.6 billion to acquire CBRN countermeasures over a 10- year period (FY2004-FY2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Hr808-Xxx.Ps
    1 Union Calendar No. 493 108th Congress, 2d Session –––––––––– House Report 108–808 ACTIVITIES REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Convened January 7, 2003 Adjourned December 8, 2003 SECOND SESSION Convened January 20, 2004 Adjourned December 7, 2004 JANUARY 3, 2005—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 97–054 WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 04 2004 22:42 Jan 03, 2005 Jkt 097054 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 E:\HR\OC\HR808.XXX HR808 congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, Chairman MICHAEL BILIRAKIS, Florida LANE EVANS, Illinois TERRY EVERETT, Alabama BOB FILNER, California STEVE BUYER, Indiana LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois JACK QUINN, New York CORRINE BROWN, Florida CLIFF STEARNS, Florida VIC SNYDER, Arkansas JERRY MORAN, Kansas CIRO D. RODRIGUEZ, Texas RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana MICHAEL H. MICHAUD, Maine ROB SIMMONS, Connecticut DARLENE HOOLEY, Oregon HENRY E. BROWN, JR., South Carolina TED STRICKLAND, Ohio JEFF MILLER, Florida SHELLEY BERKLEY, Nevada JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas TOM UDALL, New Mexico JEB BRADLEY, New Hampshire SUSAN A. DAVIS, California BOB BEAUPREZ, Colorado TIM RYAN, Ohio GINNY BROWN-WAITE, Florida STEPHANIE HERSETH, South Dakota RICK RENZI, Arizona TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania PATRICK E. RYAN, Chief Counsel and Staff Director ———–——— 1 February 5, 2003—Rep.
    [Show full text]