DOCSLIB.ORG

Modal Meanings in Different Text Types in the Field of Logistics)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modal Meanings in Different Text Types in the Field of Logistics) Oddelek za anglistiko in amerikanistiko DOCTORAL DISSERTATION MODAL MEANINGS IN DIFFERENT TEXT TYPES IN THE FIELD OF LOGISTICS APRIL, 2016 Polona VIČIČ Oddelek za anglistiko in amerikanistiko DOCTORAL DISSERTATION MODAL MEANINGS IN DIFFERENT TEXT TYPES IN THE FIELD OF LOGISTICS DOKTORSKA DISERTACIJA MODALNI ODNOSI V BESEDILNIH VRSTAH NA PODROČJU LOGISTIKE APRIL, 2016 mag. Polona VIČIČ Mentorica: doc. dr. Klementina JURANČIČ PETEK Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere thanks to doc. dr. Klementina Jurančič Petek for supervising the present thesis and continuously supporting me in the process of writing. Special thanks goes to prof. dr. Branka Čagran and dr. Jožica Zajc for their help with matters of statistics and to Dragica Brinovec for proofreading the Slovene text. I would also like to thank my family for their support and encouragement throughout the research process. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF MODALITY .................................... 5 2.1 INTRODUCTION TO MODALITY AND MODAL VERBS ................................. 5 2.2 MODALITY ............................................................................................................. 8 2.3 STUDIES OF MODALITY: PAST TO PRESENT ............................................... 11 2.3.1 Jespersen (1924) .............................................................................................. 13 2.3.2 Von Wright (1951) ........................................................................................... 15 2.3.3 Coates (1983) ................................................................................................... 17 2.3.4 Palmer ([1979], 1990 and [1986], 2001) ........................................................ 19 2.3.5 Leech ([1971], 1987) ....................................................................................... 21 2.4 CHARACTERISATION OF MODALITY ............................................................ 22 2.4.1 Characterisation by modal verbs ..................................................................... 23 2.4.1.1 CAN .......................................................................................................... 25 2.4.1.2 COULD ..................................................................................................... 27 2.4.1.3 MAY ......................................................................................................... 28 2.4.1.4 MIGHT...................................................................................................... 30 2.4.1.5 MUST ....................................................................................................... 32 2.4.1.6 OUGHT TO .............................................................................................. 34 2.4.1.7 SHOULD .................................................................................................. 36 2.4.1.8 BE ABLE TO ............................................................................................ 38 2.4.1.9 BE BOUND TO ........................................................................................ 39 2.4.1.10 BE GOING TO ....................................................................................... 40 2.4.1.11 HAVE (GOT) TO ................................................................................... 40 2.4.2 Basic semantic categories of modality ............................................................. 42 2.4.2.1 Epistemic modality ................................................................................... 43 2.4.2.2 Deontic modality ....................................................................................... 45 2.4.2.3 Dynamic modality ..................................................................................... 47 2.4.2.4 Modal mergers .......................................................................................... 49 2.4.3 Genre variation ................................................................................................ 51 2.4.4 Discipline variation ......................................................................................... 57 2.4.5 The discipline of logistics ................................................................................. 60 i 2.4.6 Language variation .......................................................................................... 62 3 CORPUS AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 63 3.1 MOTIVATION ....................................................................................................... 63 3.2 RESEARCH PROBLEM ........................................................................................ 64 3.2.1 Research questions ........................................................................................... 65 3.2.2 Research hypotheses ........................................................................................ 66 3.3 CORPUS LINGUISTIC SETTING ........................................................................ 68 3.4 CORPUS OF LOGISTICS TEXTS ........................................................................ 71 3.5 RESEARCH METHODS OF ANALYSIS ............................................................. 76 4 EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................ 78 4.1 MODAL VERBS IN ENGLISH SCIENTIFIC AND PROFESSIONAL LOGISTICS DISCOURSE ........................................................................................... 78 4.1.1 Research papers ............................................................................................... 79 4.1.2 Scientific textbook ............................................................................................ 99 4.1.3 Application handbook .................................................................................... 115 4.1.4 Spoken discourse ............................................................................................ 125 4.1.5 Statistical analysis of modal verb use in logistics written discourse ............. 131 4.2 MODAL VERBS IN SLOVENE SCIENTIFIC LOGISTICS DISCOURSE ....... 139 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ............................................................... 145 6 POVZETEK V SLOVENŠČINI ................................................................... 151 References ........................................................................................................... 159 Appendices .............................................................................................................. 1 Appendix 1: Corpus of logistics texts ............................................................................. 1 Appendix 2: Statistical comparisons of differences between subcorpora Sc1, Sc2 and Sc3 4 ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Corpus of logistics texts .......................................................................... 73 Table 2. Modal verbs and their modal meanings in the logistics research papers 81 Table 3. Proportion of epistemic, deontic and dynamic modality in the logistics research papers ...................................................................................................... 98 Table 4. Modal verbs and their modal meanings in the logistics scientific textbook ............................................................................................................................. 100 Table 5. Proportion of epistemic, deontic and dynamic modality in the logistics scientific textbook ............................................................................................... 114 Table 6. Modal verbs and their modal meanings in the application handbook... 116 Table 7. Proportion of epistemic, deontic and dynamic modality in the application handbook ............................................................................................................. 124 Table 8. Modal verbs and their modal meanings in logistics spoken discourse . 126 Table 9. Proportion of epistemic, deontic and dynamic modality in logistics spoken discourse ................................................................................................. 130 Table 10. Comparison of the use of CAN in Sc1, Sc2 and Sc3 .......................... 133 Table 11. Comparison of the use of MAY in Sc1, Sc2 and Sc3 ......................... 134 Table 12. Comparison of the use of SHOULD in Sc1, Sc2 and Sc3 .................. 135 Table 13. Comparison of the use of COULD in Sc1, Sc2 and Sc3..................... 136 Table 14. Comparison of the use of MIGHT in Sc1, Sc2 and Sc3 ..................... 137 Table 15. Comparison of the use of MUST in Sc1, Sc2 and Sc3 ....................... 138 Table 16. Modal verbs and their modal meanings in the scientific textbook in Slovene ................................................................................................................ 141 Table 17. Proportion of epistemic, deontic and dynamic modality in the scientific textbook in Slovene ............................................................................................. 144 Table 18. Proportion of epistemic, deontic and dynamic modality in the corpus of logistics text ........................................................................................................ 146 iii ABSTRACT The thesis sets out to investigate modality, which has been recognised
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Participant-Internal Possibility Modality and It's
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 5 S2 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy September 2015 Participant-internal Possibility Modality and It’s Coding by – A Bil Analytical Construction in Kazakh Gulzada Salmyrzakyzy Yeshniyaz Botagoz Ermekovna Tassyrova Dauren Bakhytzhanovich Boranbayev Kazakh Ablai Khan University of international relations and world languages, The Republic of Kazakhstan 050022, Almaty, Muratbaev Street, 200 Ruslan Askarbekovich Yermagambetov The Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda State University, The Republic of Kazakhstan, 120014, Kyzylorda, Aiteke Bie Street, 29A Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s2p211 Abstract This paper discusses the semantic paradigm of the participant-internal possibility modality as a subcategory of modality and it’s coding in Kazakh with –A bil analytical construction. We will show that –A bil expresses all semantic properties of participant- internal possibility modality such as inherent/ learnt and mental/physical. Therefore constitutes the core of the functional- semantic field of the given modality. The paper also accounts for the relation of –A bil in modal usage with other category operators such as aspect, tense and voice. Keywords: modality, ability, participant-internal, converb, functional approach 1. Introduction Despite the available vast literature on modality there is still does not exist the single definition of the domain of modality in linguistics. Mostly modality is understood as a united meaning of its subcategories which are still under scrutiny and new concepts are being offered which make difficult to stabilize the semantics of modality. It is not once noted that “the number of modalities one decide upon is to some extent a matter of different ways of slicing the same cake” (Perkins, 1983, p.10).
    [Show full text]
  • Representing-Time-An-Essay-On-Temporality-As
    Representing Time To commemorate the centenary of J. E. McTaggart’s ‘The unreality of time’ (1908) Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality K. M. JASZCZOLT 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York # K. M. Jaszczolt 2009 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book
    [Show full text]
  • Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Gitksan at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface By
    Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Gitksan at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface by Tyler Roy Gösta Peterson B.Mus., University of British Columbia, 1999 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Linguistics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) April, 2010 c Tyler Roy Gösta Peterson 2010 Abstract The aim of this dissertation is to provide an empirically driven, theoretically informed investigation of how speakers of Gitksan, a Tsimshianic language spoken in the northwest coast of Canada, express knowledge about the world around them. There are three main goals that motivate this investigation, summarized below: (1) (i.) To provide the first detailed description of the evidential and modal system in Gitksan. (ii.) To provide a formal semantic and pragmatic account of this system that adequately explains the meanings of the modals and evidentials, as well as how they are used in discourse. (iii.) To identify and examine the specific properties the Gitksan evidential/modal system brings to bear on current theories of semantics and pragmatics, as well as the consequences this analysis has on the study of modality and evidentiality cross-linguistically. In addition to documenting the evidential and modal meanings in Gitksan, I test and work through a variety of theoretical tools from the literature designed to investigate evidentiality and modality in a language. This begins by determining what level of mean- ing the individual evidentials in Gitksan operate on. The current state of research into the connection between evidentiality and epistemic modality has identified two different types of evidentials defined by the level of meaning they operate on: propositional and illocutionary evidentials.
    [Show full text]
  • Epistemic Modality: English Must, Have to and Have Got to and Their Correspondences in Lithuanian
    ISSN 1392–1517. Online ISSN 2029–8315. KALBOTYRA. 2016 • 69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Klbt.2016.10374 (Non)epistemic modality: English must, have to and have got to and their correspondences in Lithuanian Audronė Šolienė Department of English Philology Vilnius University Universiteto g. 5 LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper deals with the three types of modality – epistemic, deontic and dynamic. It examines the relation between the synchronic uses of the modal auxiliary must and the semi-modals have to and have got to as well as their Lithuanian translation correspondences (TCs) found in a bidirectional translation corpus. The study exploits quantitative and qualitative methods of research. The purpose is to find out which type of modality is most common in the use of must, have to and have got to; to establish their equivalents in Lithuanian in terms of congruent or non-congruent correspondence (Johansson 2007); and to determine how Lithuanian TCs (verbs or adverbials) correlate with different types of modality expressed. The analysis has shown that must is mostly used to convey epistemic nuances, while have to and have got to feature in non-epistemic environments. The findings show that must can boast of a great diversity of TCs. Some of them may serve as epistemic markers; others appear in deontic domains only. Have (got) to, on the other hand, is usually rendered by the modal verbs reikėti ‘need’ and turėti ‘must/have to’, which usually encode deontic modality. Key words: modality, epistemic, deontic, dynamic, necessity, obligation, translational correspondence, corpus-based analysis (Ne)episteminis modalumas: anglų kalbos must, have to ir have got to bei jų vertimo atitikmenys lietuvių kalboje Santrauka Šio darbo objektas yra trys anglų kalbos modaliniai veiksmažodžiai – must ‘turėti/ privalėti’, have to ir have got to ‘turėti/reikėti’ ir jų vertimo atitikmenys lietuvių kalboje.
    [Show full text]
  • MIINA NORVIK Future Time Reference Devices in Livonian in a Finnic Context
    DISSERTATIONES LINGUISTICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 25 MIINA NORVIK Future time reference devices in Livonian in a Finnic context Tartu 2015 ISSN 1406-5657 ISBN 978-9949-32-962-5 DISSERTATIONES LINGUISTICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 25 DISSERTATIONES LINGUISTICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 25 MIINA NORVIK Future time reference devices in Livonian in a Finnic context University of Tartu, Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics Dissertation accepted for the commencement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy on September 1st, 2015 by the Committee of the Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Tartu Supervisors: Professor Karl Pajusalu, University of Tartu Professor Helle Metslang, University of Tartu Opponent: Professor Andra Kalnača, University of Latvia th Commencement: November 12 , 2015 at 14.15, room 139 in University main building, Ülikooli 18, Tartu This study has been supported by the European Social Fund Copyright: Miina Norvik, 2015 ISSN 1406-5657 ISBN 978-9949-32-962-5 (print) ISBN 978-9949-32-963-2 (pdf) University of Tartu Press www.tyk.ee FOREWORD In autumn 2004, I came to the University of Tartu with the idea of studying English language and literature as my major and law as my minor. But after I attended the first introductory course in general linguistics taught by Renate Pajusalu, I changed my mind and decided to go deeper into linguistics. So I took Estonian and Finno-Ugric linguistics as my minor. I became interested in tense, aspect and modality when being a Bachelor’s student. In a seminar paper I discussed the use of past tenses; in my Bachelor’s thesis I concentrated on the progressive aspect in English and Estonian.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Expressions of Epistemic Modality in Mainland
    University of Groningen Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian Beijering, Karin IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2012 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Beijering, K. (2012). Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian Groningen: s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 11-02-2018 Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian A study into the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface KARIN BEIJERING The research reported on in this thesis has been carried out under the auspices of the Netherlands National Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT – Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap) and the Center for Language and Cognition Groningen (CLCG) of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Groningen. Publication of this dissertation was financially supported by the University of Groningen.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIPP Christiani Lehmanni Inedita, Publicanda, Publicata Speech-Act
    CLIPP Christiani Lehmanni inedita, publicanda, publicata titulus Speech-act participants in modality huius textus situs retis mundialis http://www.christianlehmann.eu/publ/lehmann_modality.pdf dies manuscripti postremum modificati 15.06.2012 occasio orationis habitae International Conference on Discorse and Grammar, Ghent University College, May 23-24, 2008 volumen publicationem continens ignotum annus publicationis ignotus paginae ignotae Speech-act participants in modality Christian Lehmann University of Erfurt Abstract Semantic accounts of subjective modality commonly assume that the speaker is the source of modal attitudes. However, there is a large body of data to suggest that attribut- ing a certain subjective modality to the speaker is the default only for the declarative sen- tence type. In interrogative sentences, it is often systematically the hearer who is credited with the modal attitude. For instance, Linda may go is commonly interpreted as ‘I allow Linda to go’. However, the interrogative version may Linda go? usually means ‘do you allow Linda to go?’ rather than ‘do I allow Linda to go?’ Modal operators from a small set of diverse language (English may , German sollen , Ko- rean -kess , Yucatec he’l , the Amharic and Kambaata jussive) are analyzed from the point of view of the shift of the modal assessor depending on sentence type. Some parallels from evidentiality and egophora are drawn. The result may be summarized as follows: By inferences or rules of grammar , subjective modalities may be attributed to a speech-act participant as their source. In declaratives, that is the speaker. In interrogatives, the speaker cedes the decision on the pragmatic focus to the hearer.
    [Show full text]
  • Andra Kalnača a Typological Perspective on Latvian Grammar
    Andra Kalnača A Typological Perspective on Latvian Grammar Andra Kalnača A Typological Perspective on Latvian Grammar Managing Editor: Anna Borowska Associate Editor: Helle Metslang Language Editor: Uldis Balodis Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license, which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Copyright © 2014 Andra Kalnača ISBN 978-3-11-041130-0 e- ISBN 978-3-11-041131-7 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Managing Editor: Anna Borowska Associate Editor: Helle Metslang Language Editor: Uldis Balodis www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © Ieva Kalnača Contents Abbreviations I Introduction II 1 The Paradigmatics and Declension of Nouns 1 1.1 Introductory Remarks on Paradigmatics 1 1.2 Declension 4 1.2.1 Noun Forms and Palatalization 9 1.2.2 Nondeclinable Nouns 11 1.3 Case Syncretism 14 1.3.1 Instrumental 18 1.3.2 Vocative 25 1.4 Reflexive Nouns 34 1.5 Case Polyfunctionality and Case Alternation 47 1.6 Gender 66 2 The Paradigmatics and Conjugation of Verbs 74 2.1 Introductory Remarks 74 2.2 Conjugation 75 2.3 Tense 80 2.4 Person 83 3 Aspect 89
    [Show full text]
  • A Linguistically-Motivated Annotation Model of Modality in English and Spanish: Insights from MULTINOT
    LiLT volume 14, issue (4) August 2016 A linguistically-motivated annotation model of modality in English and Spanish: Insights from MULTINOT Julia LAVID, Marta CARRETERO and Juan Rafael ZAMORANO-MANSILLA, Universidad Complutense de Madrid Abstract In this paper we present current work on the design and validation of a linguistically-motivated annotation model of modality in English and Spanish in the context of the MULTINOT project.1 Our annotation model captures four basic modal meanings and their subtypes, on the one hand, and provides a fine-grained characterisation of the syntactic realisations of those meanings in English and Spanish, on the other. We validate the modal tagset proposed through an agreement study per- formed on a bilingual sample of four hundred sentences extracted from original texts of the MULTINOT corpus, and discuss the difficult cases encountered in the annotation experiment. We also describe current steps in the implementation of the proposed scheme for the large-scale annotation of the bilingual corpus using both automatic and manual procedures. 1The MULTINOT project is financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, under grant number FF2012-32201. We gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Spanish authorities. We also thank the comments and suggestions provided by the anonymous reviewers which have helped to improve the current manuscript. 1 2 / LiLT volume 14, issue (4) August 2016 1 Introduction In this paper we describe the construction and empirical validation of a modality annotation scheme for English and Spanish in the context of the MULTINOT project, whose main aim is the development of a parallel English-Spanish corpus which is balanced – in terms of register diversity and translation directions – and whose design and enrichment with multiple layers of linguistic annotations focuses on quality rather than on quantity (see Lavid et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Modality and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface
    Modality and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface Anna Papafragou Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. University College London 1998 (LONDON) To my family with love and gratitude Abstract This thesis explores certain aspects of the structure of lexical semantics and its interaction with pragmatic processes of utterance comprehension, using as a case-study a sample of the English modal verbs. Contrary to previous polysemy-based accounts, I propose and defend a unitary semantic account of the English modals, and I give a relevance-theoretic explanation of the construction of their admissible (mainly, root and epistemic) contextual interpretations. Departing from previous accounts of modality, I propose a link between epistemic modality and metarepresentation, and treat the emergence of epistemic modal markers as a result of the development of the human theory of mind. In support of my central contention that the English modals are semantically univocal, I reanalyse a range of arguments employed by previous polysemy-based approaches. These arguments involve the distributional properties of the modals, their relationship to truth-conditional content, the status of so-called speech-act modality, and the historical development of epistemic meanings: it turns out that none of these domains can offer reasons to abandon the univocal semantic analysis of the English modals. Furthermore, I argue that the priority of root over epistemic meanings in language acquisition is predicted by the link between epistemic modality and metarepresentation. Finally, data from a cognitive disorder (autism) are considered in the light of the metarepresentation hypothesis about epistemic modality. The discussion of modality has a number of implications for the concept of polysemy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mirative and Its Interplay with Evidentiality in the Tibetan Dialect of Tabo (Spiti)
    This publication is supported by La Trobe University Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area Volume 30.2 — October 2007 http://www.latrobe.edu.au THE MIRATIVE AND ITS INTERPLAY WITH EVIDENTIALITY IN THE TIBETAN DIALECT OF TABO (SPITI) Veronika Hein University of Berne [email protected] This article presents different mirative constructions found in Tabo Tibetan. It mainly focuses on two morphemes which can express mirativity. Their usage and possible connotations are described and they are also discussed in their relationship to the complex evidential system of this dialect. Keywords: Mirative, Tabo Tibetan, mirative morphemes, connotations, evidential system. 1. INTRODUCTION The Tibetan dialect spoken at Tabo1 in the lower Spiti Valley in Himachal Pradesh, India (see map), shows a fully developed mirative with its specific set of mirative morphemes. This seems to be a new phenomenon in the Tibetan dialects described so far, as the miratives found in most descriptions of Tibetan appear to be a semantic extension of the system of evidentiality. In this paper I intend to trace a possible development from one of those well-known mirative constructions into the mirative morpheme found in Tabo Tibetan. I will go on to show that this basic mirative morpheme only occurs with some limited groups of verbs (all non-control verbs and some verbs of motion) and that a kind of parallel morpheme has been found to work in the remaining groups 1 The Tabo dialect of Tibetan will be referred to as Tabo Tibetan in this paper. The examples have all been collected from my main informant Sonam Tsering of Tabo Village.
    [Show full text]
  • Modality and Factivity: One Perspective on the Meaning of the English Modal Auxiliaries
    MODALITY AND FACTIVITY: ONE PERSPECTIVE ON THE MEANING OF THE ENGLISH MODAL AUXILIARIES by NICOLA M,BREWER Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds Department of Linguistics and Phonetics December 1987 ii ABSTRACT This study concentrates on modality as expressed by the set of modal auxiliaries and seeks to establish that these verbs share semantic as well as syntactic properties by identifying a single core meaning which they share. The relationship between modality and factivity is examined with the aim of gaining an insight into the former, more complex concept. When viewed from this perspective, the defining characteristic of all the modal auxiliary verbs in almost all of their uses is found to be nonfactivity. The meanings expressed by this set of verbs are classified according to a framework derived from modal logic consisting of three basic types of modality each of which relates to a different set of laws or principles; the relative factivity associated with the modal auxiliaries is seen to vary with the nature of modality as defined and classified by this framework. Within each of the three types of modality, a semantic scale is identified and modality is described as a gradable concept for which scalar analysis is appropriate, both within and beyond these three scales. Relative factivity is also shown to vary according to the degree of modality expressed by each of the modal verbs. The nature and degree of modality expressed interact with features of the linguistic (and pragmatic) context to determine the particular factive or a contrafactive interpretation conveyed by a given modal auxiliary token.
    [Show full text]