DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction Introduction I began this collection as a college student more than twenty-five years ago, not long after reading Loren Eiseley's semi-popular history of evolution entitled, Darwin's Century (1958). As a boy I had read several accounts of Darwin's life, and I had read at least part of his Beagle journal. As a history major at the University of California at Berkeley I found myself increasingly drawn to the history of the biological sciences. Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection towered over all other theories as the central organizing concept in biology, the most wide-ranging and profound way to understand, if not explain, the development of life. What I think attracted me most to Eiseley's book was his account of the drama that unfolded around the theory of evolution throughout the nineteenth century. Eiseley described a drama with numerous characters who took positions on either side of the evolution question. There were precursors of Darwin's theory of natural selection like William Charles Wells and Patrick Matthew. There were the opponents of Darwin such as Louis Agassiz and Richard Owen, and there were Darwin's colleagues and collabo• rators such as Sir Charles Lyell, Thomas Henry Huxley, and the co-discoverer of the theory of natural selection, Alfred Russel Wallace. From Eiseley and other books on the history of evolution I learned that evolution of simpler forms of life to the more complex was an ancient and fruitful, yet controversial, concept widely debated for centuries. It was sometimes understood as a ladder with simpler forms on lower rungs and higher forms on higher rungs. Sometimes it was thought of as "the great chain of being." The notion that there was a continuum from simple to the more complex implied to some thinkers that life had progressed since it first appeared on earth; to others itwas away to understand God's fixed plan of creation. As more and more species were discovered throughout the world in the 18th and 19th centuries, efforts to understand their inter-relationships increased. Scientists like Cuvier, who believed in the fixity of species, tended to think of and to classify new and old species in terms of standard "types". Ernst Mayr has called thinkers like Cuvier, Agassiz, and to some extent, Richard Owen, "typological thinkers" in contrast to certain evolutionists such as Lamarck and Darwin whom he called "population thinkers". While Cuvier would look at a species population and see more correspondence to what had been posited as the ideal type than deviation, Lamarck, and later Darwin, would look at all of the specimens collected for a given species and see more deviation or variation from the ideal type than correspondence to it. The "population thinker", preoccupied with variation of species, found it difficult to use the typological metaphor of fixed rungs in a ladder or fixed links in the "great chain of being." In his effort to understand the purpose of all this variation, Lamarck argued for the theory of the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Darwin and Wallace proposed the theory of natural selection. It is not possible here to develop or more fully support the wide historical generaliza• tions outlined above. However, another concept essential to the plan of the collection which I have called, after Eiseley, Darwin's Century, is the age of the earth. In Darwin's day strict religious doctrine, following James Ussher, Archbishop of Armagh, dated the creation of the world at 4004 B.C. Like biologists, geologists and palaeontologists were divided into two camps. The first of these were those who found a way to explain how the earth and its fossil record had evolved in only about 6000 years. These included Cuvier and his theories that a series of catastrophies, not unlike the biblical flood, had wiped out entire populations now preserved in the fossil record. The other camp, led by Sir Charles Lyell, were the uniformitarians who argued that the earth had evolved over hundreds of thousands of years following very gradual processes of erosion and upheaval that could be observed today. Without a way to show that the earth was very 8 old there could be no acceptance of any theory of evolution because evolution by whatever means required long periods of time—exactly how much time no one knew. Since Darwin's day the age of the earth, and by extrapolation, the date of the origin of life, has been steadily increased. During the 1970's Donald Johanson discovered Plio- pleistocene hominid fossils in Ethiopia, perhaps the earliest ancestors of modem man, yet themselves the culmination of billions of years of evolution from the first DNA molecules. These fossils which include "Lucy" and "The Family" are about 3,000,000 years old. The common threads of the history of the evolution of the earth and the fossil record (geology and paleontology), of life upon it (evolutionary biology including genetics), and of the history of the evolution of man (physical anthropology; human prehistory), make up the fabric of the Darwin's Century collection. Following Eiseley's lead I was always interested in both sides of the controversy. Therefore the collection contains both works which represent the modern point of view, such as Darwin, and representa• tives of the opposition, such as Richard Owen. It is focused around collections of first and later editions of the writings of the leading protagonists in Darwin's Century. Apart from Darwin himself, these included Alfred Russel Wallace, Sir Charles Lyell, Thomas Henry Huxley, Richard Owen, Robert Chambers, Francis Galton, Herbert Spencer, Samuel Butler, and others. Precursors of Darwin who figure in the collection include his grandfather, Erasmus, James Burnett, Jean Baptiste Lamarck, William Charles Wells and Patrick Matthew. In addition to books I attempted, whenever possible, to collect pamphlets and offprints, manuscripts, and pictorial material. I was particularly inter• ested in association and presentation copies. Editions after the first were included only if they contained textual revisions by the author. As a collector I was also conscious of condition and I believe that I maintained high standards of condition throughout the collection where rarity allowed. The core of the collection remains the Darwin material, which, while not totally complete, represents the most extensive collection of presentation and association copies of his works ever offered for sale. This collection also contains some ephemera unrecorded by Freeman in his bibliography, a small group of very significant Darwin letters, manuscript pages with choice content from both On the Origin of Species (discussing natural selection) and The Descent of Man (discussing sexual selection). I also have a set of books from Darwin's personal library when he was a young man, signed and annotated by him, and some of the best original Darwin photographs, as well as other portraits. In my experience portraits of this type are even more difficult to obtain than books or manuscripts. One of the unusual features of my Darwin collection are a number of books in special original cloth bindings expressly prepared for presentation with their edges trimmed by the binder. Only a few copies of each book were prepared in this way and the bibliographer of Darwin's writings, Richard Freeman, made no mention of them. It was one of Darwin's idiosyncracies that he disliked books that had to be opened with a paper knife before they could be read, and he objected to uncut edges because they collected dust. Supplementing the Darwin collection are the books about Darwin and Darwinism both from the standpoint of support and opposition. I tried to collect original reviews of On the Origin of Species and surprisingly was able to form a small collection of these. In collecting the opposing monographs I generally limited myself to those published during Darwin's lifetime, and I was selective —Darwin's work provoked published responses from hundreds of eccentrics. After the Darwin collection I would place second my collection of books and manu• scripts by Alfred Russel Wallace. It is possibly the most comprehensive private collection 9 of Wallace ever formed. Co-discoverer of the theory of natural selection and one of the greatest naturalist/explorers and travel writers of all time. Wallace was enjoyable to collect because of his wide interests which ranged to the point of eccentricity. (An autograph letter signed by St. George Mivart in the collection confirms that.) Even more than Darwin, Wallace was a particularly interesting letter-writer. Some of the letters and presentation copies in this collection are of considerable historical interest. I was also able to acquire the complete autograph manuscript of Wallace's last book, Social Environment and Moral Progress (1912-13). In some ways this work is a history of evolution by one of its major protagonists. No comparable autograph manuscripts by any of the other major participants in this collection appeared for sale during my many years of collecting and I strongly suspect that no comparable manuscript by Darwin, Huxley, Owen, or Lyell, is likely to ever appear on the market. Next in order of my success is the T.H. Huxley collection, with its self-portrait by Huxley drawn while he was in Australia, together with some very good copies of his books, and a group of fascinating autograph letters. Because of his opposition to Darwin, Richard Owen's books have never received the attention from collectors which they deserve. Of all my author collections I would say that the Owen collection is the least complete, but I do have all of the important works, many in presentation (one to Charles Dickens), a good manuscript, and an extraordi• nary letter, unknown to historians, in which Owen discusses Darwin's place in history.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Induction in the Socratic Tradition John P
    Induction in the Socratic Tradition John P. McCaskey Stanford University Abstract: Aristotle said that induction (epagǀgƝ) is a proceeding from particulars to a universal, and the definition has been conventional ever since. But there is an ambiguity here. Induction in the Scholastic and the (so-called) Humean tradition has presumed that Aristotle meant going from particular statements to universal statements. But the alternate view, namely that Aristotle meant going from particular things to universal ideas, prevailed all through antiquity and then again from the time of Francis Bacon until the mid-nineteenth century. Recent scholarship is so steeped in the first-mentioned tradition that we have virtually forgotten the other. In this essay McCaskey seeks to recover that alternate tradition, a tradition whose leading theoreticians were William Whewell, Francis Bacon, Socrates, and in fact Aristotle himself. The examination is both historical and philosophical. The first part of the essay fills out the history. The latter part examines the most mature of the philosophies in the Socratic tradition, specifically Bacon’s and Whewell’s. After tracing out this tradition, McCaskey shows how this alternate view of induction is indeed employed in science, as exemplified by several instances taken from actual scientific practice. In this manner, McCaskey proposes to us that the Humean problem of induction is merely an artifact of a bad conception of induction and that a return to the Socratic conception might be warranted. Introduction Aristotle said that induction (epagǀgƝ) is a proceeding from particulars to a universal, and the definition has been conventional ever since. But there is an ambiguity here.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwinism and the Argument from Design: Suggestions for a Reevaluation
    Darwinism and the Argument from Design: Suggestions for a Reevaluation PETER J. BOWLER University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba Considering the amount which has been written on the clash between Darwinism and religion, one could be forgiven for assuming that the basic outlines of the debate are well understood. Works such as Charles C. Gillispie's Genesis and Geology 1 have highlighted the theological preoccu- pations of the pre-Darwinian British naturalists, and a host of books and articles have recounted how the theory of natural selection undermined the earlier commitment to the belief that nature was designed by God. As a result, every history of science undergraduate knows that William Paley's Natural Theology of 1802 established the claim that the adaptation of each species to its environment indicated that it was designed by a benev. olent Creator, an approach developed ad nauseam in the Bridgewater Trea- tises of the 1830's. Darwin read Paley while he was at Cambridge and was impressed with the universal significance of adaptation, but his theory of natural selection provided a completely mechanistic alternative to design as an explanation of the phenomenon. After the Origin of Species appear- ed, naturalists such as the American botanist Asa Gray rushed to the defense of design and tried, unsuccessfully in the end, to adapt the basic idea of evolution to their belief in a benevolent Creator. This pattern has been described over and over again in most accounts of the Darwinian debate, from John C. Greene's The Death of Adam through to more modern accounts, such as those of Robert Young and David L.
    [Show full text]
  • Huxley and the Reception of the "Origin" Author(S): Cyril Bibby Source: Victorian Studies, Vol
    Huxley and the Reception of the "Origin" Author(s): Cyril Bibby Source: Victorian Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, Darwin Anniversary Issue (Sep., 1959), pp. 76-86 Published by: Indiana University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3825588 Accessed: 13-08-2018 12:42 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Indiana University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Victorian Studies This content downloaded from 150.135.165.110 on Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:42:05 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Cyril Bibby HUXLEY AND THE RECEPTION OF THE "ORIGIN" HE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK of its century, Darwin's Origin of ) Species, catalysed a complete rearrangement of ideological pat- m terns over a wide range of human thought. It is an interesting question why the book's impact was so immense. It was partly, no doubt, that its thesis bore so closely on vital matters of belief and speculation; partly the masterly manner in which vast numbers of facts were marshalled into overwhelming array; partly the deceptive bland- ness of style and simplicity of statement which allowed readers to im- agine that they really understood the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Address Commemorating Darwin
    Presidential Address Commemorating Darwin The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Browne, Janet. 2005. Presidential address commemorating Darwin. The British Journal for the History of Science 38, no. 3: 251-274. Published Version 10.1017/S0007087405006977 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3345924 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA BJHS 38(3): 251–274, September 2005. f British Society for the History of Science doi:10.1017/S0007087405006977 Presidential address Commemorating Darwin JANET BROWNE* Abstract. This text draws attention to former ideologies of the scientific hero in order to explore the leading features of Charles Darwin’s fame, both during his lifetime and beyond. Emphasis is laid on the material record of celebrity, including popular mementoes, statues and visual images. Darwin’s funeral in Westminster Abbey and the main commemorations and centenary celebrations, as well as the opening of Down House as a museum in 1929, are discussed and the changing agendas behind each event outlined. It is proposed that common- place assumptions about Darwin’s commitment to evidence, his impartiality and hard work contributed substantially to his rise to celebrity in the emerging domain of professional science in Britain. During the last decade a growing number of historians have begun to look again at the phenomena of scientific commemoration and the cultural processes that may be involved when scientists are transformed into international icons.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Darwin Plagiarize His Evolution Theory? — Bergman
    Countering the critics Did Darwin plagiarize his evolution theory? — Bergman this book de Maillet Did Darwin suggested that fish were the precursors of birds, mammals, plagiarize his and men.7 Yet an- other pre-Darwin evolution theory? scientist was Pierre- Louis Maupertuis Jerry Bergman (1698–1759) who in 1751 concluded in his Some historians believe that all of the major contri- book that new species butions with which Darwin is credited in regard to may result from the Courtesy TFE Graphics Courtesy evolution theory, including natural selection, actually fortuitous recombin- were plagiarized from other scientists. Many, if not ing of different parts most, of Darwin’s major ideas are found in earlier of living animals. works, especially those by his grandfather Erasmus At about this Darwin. Charles Darwin rarely (if ever) gave due same time the French credit to the many persons from whom he liberally encyclopedist, Denis Erasmus Darwin (1731–1802) ‘borrowed’. This review looks at the evidence for Diderot (1713–1784), this position, concluding that much evidence exists taught that all animals evolved from one primeval organ- to support this controversial view. ism. This prototype organism was fashioned into all those types of animals alive today via natural selection. George Louis Buffon (1707–1788) even expounded the idea at length that ‘the ape and man had a common ancestry’ and, A common (but erroneous) conclusion is that Charles further, that all animals had a common ancestor.8 Macrone Darwin conceived modern biological evolution, including concluded that, although Darwin put evolution on a firmer natural selection.1 An example of statements commonly scientific basis found in the scientific literature indicating this would be the ‘ … he was hardly the first to propose it.
    [Show full text]
  • Linnean Vol 31 1 April 2015 Press File.Indd
    TheNEWSLETTER AND PROCEEDI LinneanNGS OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Volume 31 Number 1 April 2015 Harbingers: Orchids: The Ternate Essay: Darwin’s evolutionary A botanical and Revisiting the timeline forefathers surgical liaison and more… A forum for natural history The Linnean Society of London Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF UK Toynbee House, 92–94 Toynbee Road, Wimbledon SW20 8SL UK (by appointment only) +44 (0)20 7434 4479 www.linnean.org [email protected] @LinneanSociety President SECRETARIES COUNCIL Prof Dianne Edwards CBE FRS Scienti fi c The Offi cers () Prof Simon Hiscock Vice Presidents President-Elect Dr Francis Brearley Prof Paul Brakefi eld Dr Malcolm Scoble Prof Anthony K Campbell Vice Presidents Editorial Dr Janet Cubey Ms Laura D'Arcy Prof Paul Brakefi eld Prof Mark Chase FRS Prof Jeff rey Duckett Prof Mark Chase Dr Pat Morris Dr John David Collecti ons Dr Thomas Richards Dr Anjali Goswami Dr John David Prof Mark Seaward Prof Max Telford Treasurer Strategy Dr Michael R Wilson Prof Gren Ll Lucas OBE Prof David Cutler Dr Sarah Whild Ms Debbie Wright THE TEAM Executi ve Secretary Librarian Conservator Dr Elizabeth Rollinson Mrs Lynda Brooks Ms Janet Ashdown Financial Controller & Deputy Librarian Digiti sati on Project Offi cer Membership Offi cer Mrs Elaine Charwat Ms Andrea Deneau Mr Priya Nithianandan Archivist Emerita Linnaean Project Conservators Buildings & Offi ce Manager Ms Gina Douglas Ms Helen Cowdy Ms Victoria Smith Ms Naomi Mitamura Special Publicati ons Manager Communicati ons & Events Ms Leonie Berwick Manager Mr Tom Simpson Manuscripts Specialist Dr Isabelle Charmanti er Room Hire & Membership Educati on Offi cer Assistant Mr Tom Helps Ms Hazel Leeper Editor Publishing in The Linnean Ms Gina Douglas The Linnean is published twice a year, in April and October.
    [Show full text]
  • On Knowledge Contamination: New Data Challenges Claims of Darwin’S and Wallace’S Independent Conceptions of Matthew’S Prior-Published Hypothesis
    Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy — 2015, t. 12 Philosophical Aspects of Origin s. 1-39 http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2015.t.12/art.05.pdf Mike Sutton On Knowledge Contamination: New Data Challenges Claims of Darwin’s and Wallace’s Independent Conceptions of Matthew’s Prior-Published Hypothesis Introduction “Of all crimes, the worst is the theft of glory”, wrote the poet Robert Frost. 1 Since life is short but science-fame immortal, such victimisation is hardly trivial, which means “glory theft” in science is a strangely unexplored topic. 2 To seek to begin to address the issue, this article focuses upon one such “plagiarism problem”, which has for the past 155 years dogged Charles Darwin’s claim to independent discovery of the theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Par- ticular attention is paid in this article to revealing and explaining the reaction of the scientific community to various claims made that Darwin relied heavily on the work and ideas of other naturalists, but concealed, or else played-down, the significance of their influence on what he referred to proprietarily as “my the- ory” on 43 pages of the Origin of Species. 3 1 See Robert FROST, “Kitty Hawk: Christmas Poem”, Atlantic Monthly November 1957. 2 See Mike SUTTON, “The Hi-Tech Detection of Darwin’s and Wallace’s Possible Science Fraud: Big Data Criminology Re-Writes the History of Contested Discovery”, Papers from the British Criminology Conference 2014, vol. 14, http://britsoccrim.org/new/volume14/pbcc_2014_ sutton.pdf (07.03.2016). 3 See Charles R.
    [Show full text]
  • Aprons Instead of Uniforms: the Practice of Printing, 1776-1787
    Aprons Instead of Uniforms: The Practice of Printing, 1776-1787 ROLLO G. SILVER WE DO NOT think of a master printer as primarily a busi- nessman. Because he controls a major channel of communica- tion, our tendency is to romanticize him while we forget that essentially his chief concern is the same as that of his fellow tradesmen—the bottom line of his balance sheet. In time of war, his hazard is doubled. Then all businessmen face the problems of scarcity, financing, possibility of dislocation, per- haps survival, but the printer also has the government and the public closely involved in his activities. The government uses some of his work and needs all of his support; the public assiduously heeds the opinions expressed in his publications. When the war is a civil war, such as the American Revolu- tion was in part, his predicament is even more hazardous. Maintaining a printing shop despite changes in civil authority requires ingenuity as well as tenacity and, if one holds to one's principles, courage. After all, the printer is a business- man whose stock in trade consists of twenty-six lead soldiers. It is impractical to describe all the aspects of the practice of printing during this period in one chronological narrative. So it is preferable to select those topics which best depict the activities of the printers between 1776 and 1787. These topics include the relationship between printers and the Continental Congress and the relationship between printers and the state legislatures. The expansion of the press must be considered 111 112 American Antiquarian Society as well as the impact of the Revolution on the equipment and personnel of the shop.
    [Show full text]
  • There Is No Darwin's Greatest Secret
    Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy — 2015, t. 12 Philosophical Aspects of Origin s. 325-331 http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2015.t.12/art.10.pdf Grzegorz Malec There Is No Darwin’s Greatest Secret Mike SUTTON, Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s Greatest Secret, Thinker Media [First Digital Edition], Kindle Edition 2014. Mike Sutton is an English criminologist. In 2001, he became Reader in Criminology at Nottingham Trent University. He is also a co-founder of the In- ternet Journal of Criminology and a laureate of the British Journal of Criminol- ogy Prize for his research on hackers. Sutton is the author of the book entitled Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s Great- est Secret. His book was published in 2014 by Thinker Media, an independent digital publisher, and was intended for the Kindle reader device. Sutton under- lines that his book was “rejected by all the major science publishers” not be- cause of its substantive value, 1 but because it shows that Charles Darwin (1809- 1882) does not deserve to be called “the greatest Revolutionist in natural history of this century, if not of all centuries”. 2 Nullius in Verba contains twenty long chapters, but the most important is the fourth chapter entitled “Nullius in Verba Charles Darwin. Because Many Naturalists Did Read”. The main aim of Sutton’s book is to convince his readers that Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1913) independently plagiarized Patrick Matthew’s (1790-1874) prior-published idea of evolution by natural selection from his 1 See Mike SUTTON, Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s Greatest Secret, Thinker Media [First Digi- tal Edition], Kindle Edition 2014, loc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flamingo's Smile
    The Flamingo’s Smile TFS 1. The Flamingo’s Smile ............................................................................................ 1 TFS 2. Only His Wings Remained ..................................................................................... 3 TFS 3. Sex and Size ........................................................................................................... 6 TFS 4. Living with Connections ........................................................................................ 7 TFS 5. A Most Ingenious Paradox ..................................................................................... 8 TFS 6. Adam’s Navel ........................................................................................................ 9 TFS 7. The Freezing of Noah .......................................................................................... 11 TFS 8. False Premise, Good Science ............................................................................... 12 TFS 9. For Want of a Metaphor ....................................................................................... 14 TFS 10. Of Wasps and WASPs ....................................................................................... 16 TFS 11. Opus 100 ............................................................................................................ 17 TFS 12. Human Equality is a Contingent Fact of History ............................................... 20 TFS 13. The Rule of Five ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • William Charles Wells, Md, Frs 1757-1817
    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.12.11.561 on 1 November 1928. Downloaded from THE BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY NOVEMBER, 1928 COMMUNICATIONS WILLIAM CHARLES WELLS, M.D., F.R.S. I757-i8I7 copyright. BY R. R. JAMES LONDON WVELLS is chiefly to be remembered for his essay, on single vision with the two eves. A short memoir of him occturs in Munk's Roll of the Roval Collegre of Physicians and in the Dictionary of National Biography; the foundation of each is, of course, the memoir, written by himself, which is included in the collected http://bjo.bmj.com/ edition of his works (1818.) Whatever the value of an autobio- graphy may be in some instances, in this it is all we have. X\rells was the second son and foturth child of Scottish parents and was born at Charlestown, South Carolina in MIay, 1757. His father had settled in a mercantile house in Carolina in 1753, but the business failed, and he became a bookbinder and bookseller, on October 2, 2021 by guest. Protected to which craft he had been bred in Duimfries. Prospering in his new vocation he began the publication of a newspaper, "for which he was well qualified from his previous education, being a good Latin scholar, and well read in history; lhe had, besides, studied his ow,-n language grammatically, and wrote it with great correct- ness and purity." After the peace of 1763 disloyal principles prevailed in America, and the younger Wells was obliged to wear a tartan coat and blue Scotch bonnet to make him consider himself a Scotsman, but this Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.12.11.561 on 1 November 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • Goethe As Scientist” History of Science Club University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois March 17, 1975
    “Goethe as Scientist” History of Science Club University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois March 17, 1975 Karl J. Fink In offering a discussion of Goethe as a Scientist one cannot avoid asking what a proper approach would be, for not only is there a large volume of writing by Goethe on important areas of 18th century science, but there is also over a century of interpretation with a story all its own. A study of Goethe as a Scientist in many ways mirrors trends during Goethe’s lifetime, as well as developments in science since then, and by way of introduction I might discuss the extent of the artifacts which comprise Goethe’s scientific culture.1 From about 1780 until his death in 1832 Goethe remained abreast in most fields of human and natural science. He exchanged over 500 letters with professional scientists such as Berzelius, Blumenbach, and the von Humboldt brothers and was elected to membership of scientific societies in 27 cities, including Edinburgh’s “Wernerian Natural History Society” and New York’s “Lyceum of Natural History.”2 His scientific writings comprise 11 volumes, which are being expanded by the Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher (Leopoldina) as new materials are gleaned from the various Goethe archives. 3 During his lifetime Goethe accumulated over 300 chests (kästen) full of manuscripts and contributed to German culture a museum of artifacts which include a 17,800 piece rock collection, 9,000 pages of graphic, as well as a respectable library and 1 For an excellent introduction see Helmut Holtzhaueer’s Goethe-Museum: Werk, Leven und Zeit Goethes in Dokumenten, Berlin: Aufbau Verlag, 1969.
    [Show full text]