DOCSLIB.ORG

Two Political Blocs Compete for Power in Egypt's Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Two Political Blocs Compete for Power in Egypt's Parliament Two political blocs compete for power in Egypt's parliament Battlelines in Egypt's new parliament are being drawn, with two coalitions of MPs likely to emerge, based on the distribution of key posts, rather than ideology or political platforms Gamal Essam El-Din , Saturday 2 Apr 2016 Egyptian parliament (Reuters) The internal bylaws of Egypt's parliament – the House of Representatives – were finally passed in a plenary session 30 March. They are expected to be ratified by President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi and then issued into a law this week. According to Article 97 of the new bylaws, MPs are allowed to join ranks in parliamentary blocs, but for a parliamentary bloc to be officially recognised, it must be supported by a minimum of 25 per cent of MPs drawn from at least 15 governorates. Rami Mohsen, manager of the National Centre for Parliamentary Consultancies (NCPC), says the ratification of the bylaws this week will compel MPs to join blocs. "All MPs know that the ratification of the bylaws will be immediately followed by forming parliamentary committees, and in order to compete for the leading posts of these committees they must be members of powerful blocs," said Mohsen. Mohsen expects that the 25 per cent stipulation will result in two main political blocs being formed and officially recognised by parliament. "The largest bloc will be the Support Egypt coalition, comprising around 300 MPs (around 50 per cent) and largely supportive of President Abdel-Fattah El- Sisi's political agenda," said Mohsen. Article 90 of the bylaws requires the heads of parliamentary coalitions to submit a complete list of MP members, along with the coalition's own governing regulations, to the house's internal bureau (the speaker and two deputies) before the bloc is officially recognised. Leaders of Support Egypt announced last week that the coalition's regulations have already been drafted. "Right now we are finalising our list of nominees for the leading posts of parliamentary committees," said Osama Heikal, a former minister of information and currently head of the Egyptian Media Production City (EMPC). Heikal denied that Support Egypt is a replication of former president Hosni Mubarak's ruling National Democratic Party (NDP). "Under the NDP, the election of heads of parliamentary committees was just a cosmetic procedure," said Heikal, adding, "But in the new parliament there are different political forces which will strongly compete for the leading posts of parliamentary committees." "Support Egypt is not a political party, like the NDP; it just aims to coordinate positions among the largest possible number of MPs on a number of national issues that will require consensus in parliament," said Heikal. The Free Egyptians Party in Worry and anxiety has, however, dominated the circles of the Support Egypt coalition after the Free Egyptians Party (with 65 seats) announced that it is in the process of forming an opposition parliamentary bloc. "This bloc will be composed of no less than 150 MPs (around 25 per cent), with some coming from political parties and others acting as independents," said Alaa Abed, parliamentary spokesman of the Free Egyptians Party. He said the bloc will be entitled the "Free Egyptians-Independents Alliance in parliament." Speculation is rife in parliamentary circles that a big number of Support Egypt MPs have decided to withdraw from its ranks, deciding to join the parliamentary bloc to be formed by the Free Egyptians Party. "Disappointed by the monopolistic practices of its leaders over the last two months, many MPs who had agreed at first to sign up to the Support Egypt coalition decided to leave it in favour of joining our parliamentary bloc," Abed disclosed. Abed acknowledges, however, that some of those who decided to withdraw from the Support Egypt coalition did so after it had refused to include them on the list of its nominees for leading posts in parliamentary committees. "They have the right to withdraw, and we welcome them into our ranks," said Abed. Bahaaeddin Abu Shuqqa, parliamentary spokesman of the Wafd Party (with 63 MPs), told reporters that "Wafdist MPs will not be part of any coalition," and that "they prefer to be an independent bloc." Abed told reporters that the parliamentary alliance led by the Free Egyptians Party does not aim to be "an adversary" to the pro-Sisi Support Egypt coalition. "Our bloc just doesn't want to see one political force dominate parliamentary business, or impose its say on all MPs," said Abed, stressing that "There should be a diversity of parliamentary coalitions, because this is a necessity for building a plural democracy in Egypt." Support Egypt and the Free Egyptians call themselves "parliamentary blocs in support of moderate liberal policies," as opposed to the 25-30 coalition, largely composed of leftists, which strongly believes in the ideals of the two revolutions of 25 January 2011 and 30 June 2013: social justice, greater political freedoms and establishing a functioning democracy. The 25-30 coalition includes some prominent leftist MPs such as film director Khaled Youssef, Haitham Al-Hariri, Mustafa Al-Guindi, and four members affiliated with the Egyptian Social Democratic Party. The NCPC's manager, Rami Mohsen, says that though few in number, members of the 25-30 coalition were able to rally most MPs behind their rejection of the government- drafted civil service law and in support of stripping independent MP Tawfik Okasha of parliamentary membership after he met with Israel's ambassador to Egypt. "The creation of a leftist parliamentary bloc is a necessity to strike a balance with liberal blocs, but the problem is that the number of leftists in parliament is too small to form a bloc," said Mohsen. Mohsen believes that "real diversity in Egypt's parliament should mean diversity in political forces inside Egypt's House of Representatives." "I mean that real diversity should be based on factions with different political ideologies and platforms, rather than on two main leading forces with similar political positions, and that compete only for power in parliament," said Mohsen..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arabs Want Redistribution, So Why Don't They Vote Left? Theory And
    Arabs Want Redistribution, So Why Don’t They Vote Left? Theory and Evidence from Egypt Faculty Research Working Paper Series Tarek Masoud Harvard Kennedy School April 2013 RWP13-007 Visit the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper series at: http://web.hks.harvard.edu/publications The views expressed in the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. Faculty Research Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. www.hks.harvard.edu Arabs want redistribution, so why don’t they vote left? Theory and evidence from Egypt Tarek Masoud∗ Abstract Though Egyptian voters clearly evince a desire for Islamic law (however defined), public opinion research shows that they also want robust welfare states and significant redistri- bution. Though the application of Islamic law is the special province of Islamist parties, it is left-leaning, labor-based parties who are the primary champions of the economic poli- cies that Egyptians seem to desire. Why, then, do Egyptian voters select the former over the latter? This article argues that the answer lies not in the political unsophistication of voters, the subordination of economic interests to spiritual ones, or the bureaucratic and organizational shortcomings of leftist parties, but in the ways in which the social landscape shapes the opportunities of parties in newly democratized systems to reach potential vot- ers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Political Parties in Promoting a Culture of Good Governance in Egypt Post-2011
    American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Theses and Dissertations 6-1-2015 The role of political parties in promoting a culture of good governance in Egypt post-2011 Omar Kandil Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds Recommended Citation APA Citation Kandil, O. (2015).The role of political parties in promoting a culture of good governance in Egypt post-2011 [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/60 MLA Citation Kandil, Omar. The role of political parties in promoting a culture of good governance in Egypt post-2011. 2015. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/60 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The American University in Cairo The School of Global Affairs and Public Policy The Role of Political Parties in Promoting a Culture of Good Governance in Egypt Post-2011 A Thesis Submitted to the Public Policy and Administration Department in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts By Omar Kandil Supervised by Dr. Amr Hamzawy Professor , Public Policy and Administration, AUC Dr. Lisa Anderson President, AUC Dr. Hamid Ali Associate Professor & Chair, Public Policy and Administration, AUC Spring 2015 1 Acknowledgements There are a few people without which it would have been impossible for me to finish this piece of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Application of the Islamic Principle of Brotherhood: an Assessment of the Syrian Refugees’ Relocation Solution in Egypt
    ALHAJJAIJI (DO NOT DELETE) 6/12/2018 11:13 AM Modern Application of the Islamic Principle of Brotherhood: An Assessment of the Syrian Refugees’ Relocation Solution in Egypt SHAMS AL DIN AL HAJJAJI * TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................230 I. INTRODUCTION: THE DILEMMA OF REACHING A SOLUTION FOR SYRIAN REFUGEES ...................................................................................231 II. T HE ISLAMIC BASIS FOR THE RELOCATION PROJECT: THE ISLAMIC PRINCIPLE OF BROTHERHOOD ..................................................................237 III. ASSESSMENT OF THE RELOCATION PERSPECTIVE ......................................242 A. Theoretical Assessment of the Relocation Solution........................242 1. Historical Aspect: Long Ties of Friendship and Mutual Interest.................................................................242 a. Brief Historical Background Between Egypt and Syria ...................................................................................242 b. The Arab Spring and the Refugee Crisis............................247 2. Cultural Aspect: One Religion, Language and Culture ..........249 B. Practical Legal Assessment: Extending the Protection of Egyptians’ Law to Syrians as Arabs ..........................................251 1. Inadequacy of the 1951 UN Convention .................................251 2. National Alternative: Offer Syrians a Special Status as Arabs .......................................................................252
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties and Public Opinion in Egypt. February 2014
    Political Parties and Public Opinion in Egypt. February 2014. Mohammed el-Agati Nick Sigler Nick Harvey MP Poll study by Sobhy Essaila Foreword by Greg Power Political Parties and Public Opinion in Egypt Political Parties and Public Opinion in Egypt Researchers in the order of the papers: Greg Power : (Director of Global Partners Governance) (Political researcher and the executive Mohamed El-Agati : Director of the AFA) (Head of international relations for UNISON Nick Sigler : syndicate) (Member of House of Commons and Former Nick Harvy : Minister) (Pollster and expert at Al-Ahram center for Sobhi essela : strategic and political studies) Publishers: Arab Forum for Alternatives and Global Partners Governance No. filing Publishing and Distribution +2 01222235071 [email protected] www.rwafead.com These papers are the product of an internal seminar. They are issued in a non-periodic manner and reflect only the views of their authors and not necessarily the opinion of the Arab Forum for Alternatives (AFA) or any of its partner institutions. Index CHALLENGES FOR POLITICAL PARTIES IN TRANSITIONAL ELECTIONS - ORGANISATION, POLICIES AND IDENTITY .............................................................. 7 ANALYSIS OF A STUDY ON THE ORIENTATION OF EGYPTIANS REGARDING POLITICAL PARTICIPATION AND POLITICAL PARTIES............................................ 11 OPINION POLLS AND EGYPTIAN POLITICAL PARTIES (BENEFITSAND PITFALLS) ... 21 POLITICAL PARTIES AND CAMPAIGNING: CONCLUSIONS FROM THE POLL .......... 27 EGYPTIANS’ PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Parliamentary Elections and the Political Path
    Papers Arab Forum for Alternatives Alternatives Egyptian parliamentary elections and the political path Arab Forum for Alternatives Arab Forum for Alternatives (AFA) Address :5 ,Al-Mesaha St., Fourth Floor, App. 4, Dokki, Giza, Egypt Telefax: +202-37629937 Mail: [email protected] Website: www.afaegypt.org Twitter: AFAlternatives Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/AFAlternatives 0 http://www.facebook.com/groups/113792226817/ Skype: arab.forum.for.alternatives Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOoJBExCeXW7bO5JMaSPd1Q Egyptian parliamentary elections and the political path Unlike previous cases, the last parliamentary elections in Egypt saw the participation of almost all political factions and were boycotted by the Muslim Brotherhood and their supporters, several youth and revolutionary movements, and a considerable number of non- politicized citizens. This was clearly demonstrated in the discrepancy between the turn out in the 2015 elections and 2012 elections, the latter being held right after the 2011 revolution. Free and fair elections? The 2012 and 2015 elections saw a major transformation as far as freedom and fairness are concerned, especially when compared to the violations committed in previous rounds before the 2011 revolution. Rigging was almost absent across polling stations and violations were rather attributed to the lack of organization and mismanagement or the inability to monitor lobbying activities practiced right outside the polling stations. The 2015 violations mostly took place outside the polling stations and very few inside unlike the 2010 elections that witnessed the most flagrant actions of systematic rigging by state institutions both inside and outside polling stations. All political factions took part in the 2012 elections and most violations took place outside the polling stations, while not all political factions took part in the 2015 elections and there were more violations despite the fact that the so-called “transparency of the ballot box,” which means no vote rigging, was maintained in both.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Political Parties in Promoting a Culture of Good Governance in Egypt Post-2011
    The American University in Cairo The School of Global Affairs and Public Policy The Role of Political Parties in Promoting a Culture of Good Governance in Egypt Post-2011 A Thesis Submitted to the Public Policy and Administration Department in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts By Omar Kandil Supervised by Dr. Amr Hamzawy Professor , Public Policy and Administration, AUC Dr. Lisa Anderson President, AUC Dr. Hamid Ali Associate Professor & Chair, Public Policy and Administration, AUC Spring 2015 1 Acknowledgements There are a few people without which it would have been impossible for me to finish this piece of work. Two of the most important women of my life top the list: my mother Amany Mohamed Abdallah and my wife-to-be Hanya El-Azzouni, who are the fuel of all of my past, present and future life’s endeavors. I must thank them and express my deepest love and gratitude to everything they have given me and their presence in my life day by day. It would have been impossible to make it through without them. You are my blessings. This thesis closes my chapter as an AUC student, a chapter which opened in 2007. This place has given me so much and I would not have been able to write this research without the numerous opportunities this institution has blessed me with. I especially wish to thank President Lisa Anderson for being a constant source of guidance, friendship, and support throughout the past years, on all levels of my AUC experience, as an undergraduate student, graduate student, staff member, and now on this work.
    [Show full text]
  • PETER HENNESSEY CONTENTS EVENTS Chair’S Letter 3 September 7Th – 21St Liberal Democrats Autumn the Thin Wisps of Tomorrow’ Peter Hennessey 4 Conference,Birmingham
    2011 no.2 £3.00 (free to members) PETER HENNESSEY CONTENTS EVENTS Chair’s Letter 3 September 7th – 21st Liberal Democrats Autumn The Thin Wisps of Tomorrow’ Peter Hennessey 4 Conference,Birmingham. Sunday 18th Where do we go from here? /Social Liberal Turkey after the 2011 Election – a snapshot 8 Forum with Will Hutton, Jackie Ashley and Julian Huppert 20.00-21.15 Hall 5 ICC Statement by the Taoiseach, Enda Kenny, on the Dáil Motion on Sunday 18th “The Israeli Peace Initiative: Can it succeed?” the report of the Commission of Investigation into the Catholic Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel. Diocese of Cloyne, in Dáil Éireann, 20th July 2011 10 20.00-21.15 pm, Jurys Inn Hotel, Room 101. Monday 19th "Who benefits from the arms trade ?" Liberal Alea iacta est 11 Democrats for Peace and Security. Nick Harvey (Minister for the Armed Forces) & Oliver Napier 12 Anne Feltham (Campaign Against the Arms Trade). 20.00 to 21.15 Jury's Inn Room 103. Cuba – a Gross miscarriage of Justice 14 Monday 19th Palestine: in the shadow of the Arab Uprising – Tory MEP backs independent Somaliland what role should Britain play?MAP, the New Statesman and Liberal Democrat Friends of David Brandon Griffiths. 15 Palestine. Mehdi Hasan (New Statesman), Steve James (MAP), Sir Menzies Campbell, Simon Alliance gains in Assembly and Council elections 16 Hughes, John McHugo (LDFP). 18.15 – 19.30 pm Novotel Hotel, Burne-Jones room. Personal Memories of Elizabeth Sidney 17 Tuesday 20th The Arab Awakening - how best should the The Community of Democracies international community should respond to it? LIBG/LDEG.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratization in the Arab World
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Democratization in the in Democratization Arab World Daunting challenges lie ahead for Arab countries where revolutions upended longstanding authoritarian regimes in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt Elections Roundup Issues Paper
    Egypt Elections Roundup 2 April 2012 Contents Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Results of People’s Assembly Elections .................................................................................................. 3 Results of Shura Council Elections .......................................................................................................... 5 MAIN PLAYERS ........................................................................................................................................ 7 The Freedom and Justice Party (Muslim Brotherhood) ...................................................................... 7 The Salafi Al-Nour (Light Party) ........................................................................................................... 9 Al-Wafd (Delegation Party) ............................................................................................................... 11 The Egypt Bloc ................................................................................................................................... 13 NEXT STEPS ........................................................................................................................................... 14 Constitution ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Presidential Elections .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interlib 2014-04 Vi
    2014 no.4 £5.00 (free to members) SOMETHING WE’VE ALWAYS SUSPECTED? THE VVD INTERNATIONAL… Inside: Genocide: Rotterdam Report EVENTS CONTENTS 2nd June Egypt Forum. Lawrence Robson Room, Reflections on Genocide. Nigel Dower Pages 3-6 NLC. 7.00pm Scottish Group report Page 6 5th June Tim Garden Memorial Lecture: Sir Menzies LI Congress, Rotterdam report Pages 6-7 Campbell MP will speak on 'Whither Europe?' Chatham House 6.00pm North West Group report Page 8 30th June LIBG AGM, NLC followed by joint International Abstracts Page 8 meeting with Liberal Democrat History Group on 1914. UK China Twinned Cities. Page 9 4th –8th October Liberal Democrats Autumn Conference, Glasgow Elections Euro & Other. Stewart Rayment Page 9 Reviews Pages 10-12 For bookings & other information please contact the Chair below. NLC= National Liberal Club, Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2HE Underground: Embankment Lord Garden Memorial Lecture Britain and Europe: A Common Future? Liberal International (British Group) Chair: Wendy Kyrle-Pope, 1 Brook Gardens, Sir Menzies Campbell MP, Barnes,London SW13 0LY email [email protected] Leader, Liberal Democrats (2006-07) Thursday 5 June 2014 18:00 to 19:00 Chatham House, St James’s Square, London, SW1Y 4LE Menzies will examine the continuing case for Britain's place in the European Union in light of the results of the 2014 EU Parliamentary elections. As the debate intensifies as to whether the UK should remain in the interLib is published by the Liberal International EU, he will reflect on the advantages of the UK (British Group). Views expressed therein are those of continuing as a member state, as well as the need for the authors and are not necessarily the views of reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Electoral Authoritarianism in Egypt
    Please do not remove this page Military electoral authoritarianism in Egypt Aziz, Sahar F. https://scholarship.libraries.rutgers.edu/discovery/delivery/01RUT_INST:ResearchRepository/12643396150004646?l#13643549520004646 Aziz, S. F. (2017). Military electoral authoritarianism in Egypt. In Election Law Journal (Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 280–295). Rutgers University. https://doi.org/10.7282/T35142T3 This work is protected by copyright. You are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, for research and educational purposes. Other uses, such as reproduction or publication, may require the permission of the copyright holder. Downloaded On 2021/09/30 09:23:52 -0400 ELECTION LAW JOURNAL Volume 16, Number 2, 2017 Military Electoral Authoritarianism in Egypt Sahar F. Aziz1 Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Electoral Authoritarianism .................................................................................................................... 4 III. Elections Under Sadat and Mubarak ................................................................................................ 6 A. Sadat Introduces Multiparty Elections .............................................................................................. 7 B. Mubarak Promotes Civilian Electoral Authoritarianism ................................................................... 8 IV. From Revolution to Military Coup: General Sisi Becomes
    [Show full text]
  • NATO, the EU, and the Arab Refugee Crisis
    Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs Volume 6 Issue 1 June 2018 NATO, the EU, and the Arab Refugee Crisis Shams Al Din Al Hajjaji Follow this and additional works at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons ISSN: 2168-7951 Recommended Citation Shams Al Din Al Hajjaji, NATO, the EU, and the Arab Refugee Crisis, 6 PENN. ST. J.L. & INT'L AFF. (2018). Available at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol6/iss1/7 The Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs is a joint publication of Penn State’s School of Law and School of International Affairs. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 2018 VOLUME 6 NO. 1 NATO, THE EU AND THE ARAB REFUGEE CRISIS Shams Al Din Al Hajjaji* This Article argues that the solution of relocating Syrian refugees in Egypt is a feasible solution. The Syrian refugee crisis has been a major challenge for many Western countries, who have found themselves between a rock and a hard place, faced with two options. The first option involved agreeing to host the massive waves of refugees, to honor their principles of human dignity and morality. The second involved closing their doors to them, in order to protect the quality of their lives. Many countries made their own choice: some chose the first option, while many others are still struggling to find a way to accommodate the second choice. Politicians, philosophers and business executives proposed several solutions, most of which are of proven inefficacy, like those of Trump and the EU.
    [Show full text]