DOCSLIB.ORG

Operation Quicksilver (Deception Plan) from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operation Quicksilver (Deception Plan) from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Operation Quicksilver (deception plan) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Operation Quicksilver was a Second World War military deception. Undertaken by the Quicksilver Allies in 1944, the operation threatened an Part of Operation Bodyguard / Operation invasion of France in the Pas de Calais region Fortitude through the simulation of a large Field Army in South East England. Quicksilver formed part of the Operation Fortitude deception, itself part of the strategic Operation Bodyguard plan. The key element of Quicksilver was the creation in German minds that "First United States Army Group" (FUSAG) commanded by General George Patton supposedly would land in the Pas­de­ Calais for the major invasion of Europe, after the landings in Normandy had lured the German defenders to that front. (FUSAG was a genuine army group headquarters which later became Omar Bradley's 12th Army Group, but was given a fictitious role and many non­ The D­Day naval deceptions made up one part existent divisions for purposes of deception.) of Operation Bodyguard. Juan Pujol García, known by the British code Operational Strategic Deception name Garbo and the German code name scope Arabel, was a double agent loyal to the Allies Location South East England who played a crucial role in the deception by Planned 1944 supplying Germany with detailed information from a network of non­existent sub­agents Planned by London Controlling Section, supporting the idea that the main invasion was Ops (B), R Force to be in the Pas­de­Calais. Target Pas de Calais Date January ­ July 1944 Outcome Credited with contributing to Contents the strategic success of D­Day landings, as part of the overall 1 Background Bodyguard plan. 2 Overview 3 References 3.1 Bibliography 4 External links Background Quicksilver was a World War II deception operation conducted by the Allied Nations. It formed part of Operation Bodyguard, a broad strategic military deception intended to support the Allied invasion of German­occupied France in July 1944. Bodyguard was designed to confuse the Axis high command as to Allied intentions during the lead­up to the invasion. Operation Fortitude South was a sub­plan of Bodyguard which called for the fabrication of a non­existent field army in South East England, with the aim of threatening an invasion in the Pas de Calais region of France.[1] The Allied story for FUSAG was that the army group, based in south­east England, would invade the Pas de Calais region several weeks after a smaller diversionary landing in Normandy. The order of battle for the army was intended to represent, to the German viewpoint, the bulk of Allied forces in England. Quicksilver was the code name for a number of physical deceptions to support the fabrication of FUSAG, including wireless deception, troop movements and bombing campaigns.[2] Overview Quicksilver was subdivided into six subplans numbered I through VI: 1. Quicksilver I was the basic "story" for Fortitude: the First United States Army Group, based in the southeast of England, was to land in Pas­de­Calais after German reserves were committed to Normandy.[3] 2. Quicksilver II was the radio deception plan of Quicksilver, involving the apparent movement of units from their true locations to southeastern England.[4] Insignia of FUSAG, the 3. Quicksilver III was the display of dummy landing fictional field army used craft, including associated simulated wireless traffic during the operation and signing of roads and special areas.[5] 4. Quicksilver IV was the air plan for Quicksilver, including bombing of the Pas­de­ Calais beach area and tactical railway bombing immediately before D­Day.[6] 5. Quicksilver V was increased activity around Dover (giving impression of extra tunneling, additional wireless stations), to suggest embarkation preparations.[7] 6. Quicksilver VI was night lighting to simulate activity at night where dummy landing craft were situated. Quicksilver, like the rest of Fortitude South, was devised by Colonel David Strangeways, Montgomery's deception officer, and carried out under his supervision. Strangeways was very adept at deceiving the Germans. His ideas throughout the war had the Germans duped many times. The operation was carried out by means of false radio signals purporting to show units massing in southeastern England, together with false reports to German intelligence by double agents provided by the Double Cross System. Allowing one of the double agents to claim to have stolen documents describing the closely guarded invasion plans might have aroused suspicion. Instead, agents were allowed to report minutiae such as insignia on soldiers' uniforms and unit markings on vehicles. The observations in the south­central areas largely gave accurate information about the units located there: the actual invasion forces. Reports from southwest England indicated few troop sightings, when in reality many units were housed there. Reports from the southeast depicted the real and the notional Quicksilver forces. Any military planner would know that to mount a massive invasion of Europe from England, Allied units had to be staged around the country, with those that would land first nearest to the invasion point. German intelligence used the agent reports to construct an order of battle for the Allied forces that placed the center of gravity of the invasion force opposite Pas de Calais, the point on the French coast closest to England and therefore a likely invasion site. The deception was so effective that the Germans kept 15 reserve divisions near Calais even after the invasion had begun at Normandy, lest it prove to be a diversion from the "real" invasion at Calais.[8][9] Contrary to a widespread misconception, the FUSAG deception was not primarily implemented with dummy tanks, airplanes, or other dummy equipment, since at that stage of the war the Germans were unable to fly reconnaissance planes over England and such effort would have been wasted. Dummy landing craft were stationed at ports in eastern and southeastern England where they might be observed by the Germans.[10][11] (The Allies did possess extensive dummy equipment, which was used in North Africa and later in continental Europe.) References 1. Latimer (2001), pp. 218–232 2. Holt (2004), pp. 578–579 3. Deuve, Jean. Histoire secrete des stratagemes de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. pp. 231–233. ISBN 978­83­7495­858­5. 4. Deuve, Jean. Histoire secrete des stratagemes de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. 978­83­7495­ 858­5. pp. 234–238. ISBN 978­83­7495­858­5. 5. Deuve, Jean. Histoire secrete des stratagemes de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. 978­83­7495­ 858­5. pp. 238–239. ISBN 978­83­7495­858­5. 6. Deuve, Jean. Histoire secrete des stratagemes de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. 978­83­7495­ 858­5. pp. 239–242. ISBN 978­83­7495­858­5. 7. Deuve, Jean. Histoire secrete des stratagemes de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. 978­83­7495­ 858­5. p. 242. ISBN 978­83­7495­858­5. 8. Masterman, John C (1972) [1945], The Double­Cross System in the War of 1939 to 1945 (http:// www.amazon.com/double­cross­system­war­1939­1945/dp/0708104592), Australian National University Press, p. 223ff, ISBN 978­0­7081­0459­0 9. Moore, Alan T. (2009­12­01). "The Principles Of Military Deception And Operation Quicksilver" (http://www.dtic.mil/cgi­bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA536835). Retrieved 2013­04­16. 10. Holt, Thaddeus (2004), The Deceivers: Allied Military Deception in the Second World War, New York: Scribner, p. 537, ISBN 0­7432­5042­7 11. Howard, Michael (1990), British Intelligence in the Second World War, Vol. 5: Strategic Deception, New York: Cambridge U. Press, p. 120, ISBN 0­11­630954­7 Bibliography Holt, Thaddeus (2004). The Deceivers: Allied Military Deception in the Second World War. New York: Scribner. ISBN 0­7432­5042­7. Latimer, Jon (2001). Deception in War. New York: New York: Overlook Press. ISBN 978­1­58567­381­0. Levine, Joshua (2011). Operation Fortitude: The True Story of the Key Spy Operation of WWII That Saved D­Day. London: HarperCollins UK. ISBN 0­00­741324­6. External links "Decoy Army Fooled Nazi Masterminds", February 1946, Popular Mechanics (https:// books.google.com/books?id=2yADAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA126&dq=popular+science+F ebruary+1946&hl=en&ei=vOPkTL3jJsnOnAf8toClDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=re sult&resnum=5&ved=0CDMQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=popular%20science%20Febr uary%201946&f=true) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Operation_Quicksilver_(deception_plan)&oldid=726816152" Categories: Operation Overlord Operation Fortitude World War II deception operations This page was last edited on 24 June 2016, at 16:04. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution­ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non­profit organization..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • D-DAY in NORMANDY Speaker: Walter A. Viali, PMP Company
    D-DAY IN NORMANDY Speaker: Walter A. Viali, PMP Company: PMO To Go LLC Website: www.pmotogo.com Welcome to the PMI Houston Conference & Expo and Annual Job Fair 2015 • Please put your phone on silent mode • Q&A will be taken at the close of this presentation • There will be time at the end of this presentation for you to take a few moments to complete the session survey. We value your feedback which allows us to improve this annual event. 1 D-DAY IN NORMANDY The Project Management Challenges of the “Longest Day” Walter A. Viali, PMP PMO To Go LLC WALTER A. VIALI, PMP • Worked with Texaco in Rome, Italy and in Houston, Texas for 25 years and “retired” in 1999. • Multiple PMO implementations throughout the world since 1983. • On the speaker circuit since 1987. • PMI member since 1998, became a PMP in 1999. • Co-founder of PMO To Go LLC (2002). • PMI Houston Chapter Board Member from 2002 to 2008 and its President in 2007. • PMI Clear Lake - Galveston Board Member in 2009-2010. • PMI Region 6 Mentor (2011-2014). • Co-author of “Accelerating Change with OPM” (2013). • Project Management Instructor for UH College of Technology. 3 Project Management and Leadership in History 4 More than 9,000 of our boys rest in this foreign land they helped liberate! ‹#› 5 WHAT WAS D-DAY? • In the early morning hours of June 6, 1944, American, British, and Canadian troops launched an attack by sea, landing on the beaches of Normandy on the northern coast of Nazi-occupied France.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaef-Sgs-Records.Pdf
    363.6 DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS SUPREME HEADQUARTERS, ALLIED EXPEDITIONARY FORCE, OFFICE OF SECRETARY, GENERAL STAFF: Records, 1943-45 [microfilm] Accession 71-14 Processed by: DJH Date completed: June 1991 The microfilm of the records of the Secretary of the General Staff, Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force, was sent to the Eisenhower Library by the Modern Military Records Division of the National Archives in September 1969. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 4 Number of reels of microfilm: 62 Literary rights in the SHAEF records are in the public domain. These records were processed in accordance with the general restrictions on access to government records as set forth by the National Archives. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) was a joint U.S. - British military organization created in England in February 1944 to carry out the invasion of Western Europe. Dwight D. Eisenhower, an officer of the United States Army, was appointed Supreme Allied Commander. Eisenhower organized his staff along U.S. military lines with separate staff sections devoted to personnel (G-1), intelligence (G-2), operations (G-3), logistics (G-4) and civilian affairs (G-5). The most significant files at SHAEF were kept in the Office of the Secretary of the General Staff (SGS). The SGS office served as a type of central file for SHAEF. The highest-level documents that received the personal attention of the Supreme Allied Commander and the Chief of Staff usually ended up in the SGS files. Many of the staff sections and administrative offices at SHAEF retired material to the SGS files.
    [Show full text]
  • The Allied D-Day Deception Campaign and Media Use
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE OPERATION FORTITUDE: THE ALLIED D-DAY DECEPTION CAMPAIGN AND MEDIA USE THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY FOR CANDIDACY FOR THE BACHLEORS DEGREE OF ARTS BY LUKE E. ANDERSON EAU CLAIRE, WI MAY 2010 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire with the consent of the author. For my grandfather, and all others who served Abstract Throughout the Second World War, the Allies focused much of their war effort on Operation Fortitude, a campaign strictly for the purpose of misinforming the Axis Powers. One extensive use of misinformation came before and after the assault on Normandy in June of 1944, more popularly known as D-Day. The Allies’ goal was to make the Germans believe the attack would be coming at Pas de Calais, much further east and closer to England. The Allies used a number of different strategies to accomplish this, including extensively bombing the Calais area, using General George Patton as a commander “decoy,” and even creating a fake invasion force. This paper examines how the media was used to carry misinformation. The Allies used both newspapers and radio broadcasts to influence the Germans into believing an attack would be coming at Calais, not Normandy. By withholding the secret details of the invasion, the American public was also led to believe an attack was coming at Calais. I argue, although double-agents were also an important way to transmit false information, without the use of media an effective campaign would have been much more difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • International Spy Museum
    International Spy Museum Searchable Master Script, includes all sections and areas Area Location, ID, Description Labels, captions, and other explanatory text Area 1 – Museum Lobby M1.0.0.0 ΚΑΤΆΣΚΟΠΟΣ SPY SPION SPIJUN İSPİYON SZPIEG SPIA SPION ESPION ESPÍA ШПИОН Language of Espionage, printed on SCHPION MAJASUSI windows around entrance doors P1.1.0.0 Visitor Mission Statement For Your Eyes Only For Your Eyes Only Entry beyond this point is on a need-to-know basis. Who needs to know? All who would understand the world. All who would glimpse the unseen hands that touch our lives. You will learn the secrets of tradecraft – the tools and techniques that influence battles and sway governments. You will uncover extraordinary stories hidden behind the headlines. You will meet men and women living by their wits, lurking in the shadows of world affairs. More important, however, are the people you will not meet. The most successful spies are the unknown spies who remain undetected. Our task is to judge their craft, not their politics – their skill, not their loyalty. Our mission is to understand these daring professionals and their fallen comrades, to recognize their ingenuity and imagination. Our goal is to see past their maze of mirrors and deception to understand their world of intrigue. Intelligence facts written on glass How old is spying? First record of spying: 1800 BC, clay tablet from Hammurabi regarding his spies. panel on left side of lobby First manual on spy tactics written: Over 2,000 years ago, Sun Tzu’s The Art of War. 6 video screens behind glass panel with facts and images.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation-Overlord.Pdf
    A Guide To Historical Holdings In the Eisenhower Library Operation OVERLORD Compiled by Valoise Armstrong Page 4 INTRODUCTION This guide contains a listing of collections in the Dwight D. Eisenhower Library relating to the planning and execution of Operation Overlord, including documents relating to the D-Day Invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944. That monumental event has been commemorated frequently since the end of the war and material related to those anniversary observances is also represented in these collections and listed in this guide. The overview of the manuscript collections describes the relationship between the creators and Operation Overlord and lists the types of relevant documents found within those collections. This is followed by a detailed folder list of the manuscript collections, list of relevant oral history transcripts, a list of related audiovisual materials, and a selected bibliography of printed materials. DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY Abilene, Kansas 67410 September 2006 Table of Contents Section Page Overview of Collections…………………………………………….5 Detailed Folder Lists……………………………………………….12 Oral History Transcripts……………………………………………41 Audiovisual: Still Photographs…………………………………….42 Audiovisual: Audio Recordings……………………………………43 Audiovisual: Motion Picture Film………………………………….44 Select Bibliography of Print Materials…………………………….49 Page 5 OO Page 6 Overview of Collections BARKER, RAY W.: Papers, 1943-1945 In 1942 General George Marshall ordered General Ray Barker to London to work with the British planners on the cross-channel invasion. His papers include minutes of meetings, reports and other related documents. BULKELEY, JOHN D.: Papers, 1928-1984 John Bulkeley, a career naval officer, graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1933 and was serving in the Pacific at the start of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Second World War Deception Lessons Learned for Today’S Joint Planner
    Air University Joseph J. Redden, Lt Gen, Commander Air Command and Staff College John W. Rosa, Col, Commandant James M. Norris, Col, Dean Stuart Kenney, Maj, Series Editor Richard Muller, PhD, Essay Advisor Air University Press Robert Lane, Director John Jordan, Content Editor Peggy Smith, Copy Editor Prepress Production: Mary Ferguson Cover Design: Daniel Armstrong Please send inquiries or comments to: Editor The Wright Flyer Papers Air Command and Staff College (ACSC/DER) 225 Chennault Circle Bldg 1402 Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6426 Tel: (334) 953-2308 Fax: (334) 953-2292 Internet: [email protected] AIR COMMAND AND STAFF COLLEGE AIR UNIVERSITY Second World War Deception Lessons Learned for Today’s Joint Planner Donald J. Bacon Major, USAF Air Command and Staff College Wright Flyer Paper No. 5 MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA December 1998 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. ii Foreword It is my great pleasure to present another of the Wright Flyer Papers series. In this series, Air Command and Staff College (ACSC) recognizes and publishes the “best of the best” student research projects from the prior academic year. The ACSC re - search program encourages our students to move beyond the school’s core curriculum in their own professional development and in “advancing aerospace power.” The series title reflects our desire to perpetuate the pioneering spirit embodied in earlier generations of airmen.
    [Show full text]
  • D-Day HISTORYHIT.COM
    D-Day HISTORYHIT.COM 1 D-Day HISTORYHIT.COM On 6 June 1944, the Allies launched the greatest amphibious invasion in history. Codenamed “Overlord” but best known today as “D-Day”, the operation saw Allied forces landing on the beaches of Normandy in Nazi-occupied France in huge numbers. By the end of the day, the Allies had established a foothold on the French coastline. The statistics for the invasion force involved in the operation are staggering. By midnight on 6 June, 132,000 Allied forces had landed in France, while more than 2 million were eventually shipped there, comprising a total of 39 divisions. Thousands of vessels took part in the operation including 139 major warships; 221 smaller combat vessels; more than 1000 minesweepers and auxiliary vessels; 4,000 landing craft; 805 merchant ships; 59 blockships; and 300 miscellaneous small craft. Eleven thousand aircraft also took part including fighters, bombers, transports and gliders. The invasion force also had the support of around 350,000 members of the French Resistance, who launched hit-and-run attacks on German targets. From Omaha Beach to Operation Bodyguard this eBook explores D-Day and the beginning of the Battle of Normandy. Detailed articles explain key topics, edited from various History Hit resources. Included in this eBook are articles written for History Hit by some of the world’s leading World War Two historians, including Patrick Eriksson and Martin Bowman. Features written by History Hit staff past and present are also included. You can access all these articles on historyhit.com. D-Day was compiled by Tristan Hughes.
    [Show full text]
  • Art of Deception: Selling a Story to the German Army
    NATIONAL EISENHOWER MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS LESSON Art of Deception: Selling a Story to the German Army Duration One 45-minute period Grades 7–12 Cross-curriculum Application U.S. History, World History, Geography, English, Media Arts NATIONAL EISENHOWER MEMORIAL LESSON: ART OF DECEPTION | 1 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS Historical Background As Supreme Allied Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower later remarked, “Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.” Operation Overlord, also known as D-Day, was a massive undertaking involving unprecedented planning and meeting challenges in execution. The operation consisted of 2,700 ships manned by 195,000 sailors. The fleet carried 156,000 troops, 12,000 vehicles, 2,000 tanks, and nearly 10,000 tons of stores across the English Channel. In addition, thousands of military aircraft supported the amphibious invasion. The success of the Normandy invasion also depended on the element of surprise. All the plan- ning and effort that went into the operation could have been undone if German military leaders knew the location and timing of the landing ahead of time. German military leaders worked hard to determine what General Eisenhower and the Allies planned to do. In order to keep this important information secret, Eisenhower and his advisors initiated Operation Bodyguard (part of a larger deception plan called Operation Fortitude) to confuse the German forces about the exact location of the landing. Objective Students will examine primary sources related to some of the Allied plans to deceive the German Army as to the time and location of the invasion of northern Europe. What techniques of decep- tion were used? What role does deception play in military strategy? What can these deceptions tell us about how the German military viewed the Allies? Students will take on the role of documentary filmmaker and develop a plan for a short video promotion for a film on Allied military deceptions during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTEMBER 2004.Open 11­00A.M
    EDITORIAL Martlesham Heath Aviation Society "OPEN DAY " 12th SEPTEMBER 2004.Open 11­00a.m. till 4­00p.m. By the time many of you have read this Newsletter our “Open Day” will be upon September 12th will be our fourth Open Day and we all hope that the weather will us. Hopefully we will have welcomed a few friends from across the Atlantic. be as good this year as last. There will be many Side Stalls and Aviation Historic Robert Dunnett always works so hard to bring us our annual Open Day has Displays, we will also have World War II and Civilian 39/45 period Vehicles, included some notes about the next few days. model Aircraft Flying Displays, the Chuck Wagon for those tasty Beef and We were saddened to hear of the passing of one of the 356 th FG veterans who died Hamburgers and of course the Ice Cream Stall that helped to cool us down last recently. Preston Easley clearly remembered with emotion his time over here all year. There will be a Grand Draw with a top prize of £50 which can be used for a those years ago because Preston, in conjunction with his son, Preston jnr. Has flight around this area, maybe taking 'photo's of your house from aloft! We will been instrumental in enabling us to replace the cupola on top of the control tower. have our in­house music and of course the wonderful Martlesham Brass will be Thus restoring it to its wartime configuration. They have provided considerable playing some of the sounds of the 40's.
    [Show full text]
  • ED 194 419 EDRS PRICE Jessup, John E., Jr.: Coakley, Robert W. A
    r r DOCUMENT RESUME ED 194 419 SO 012 941 - AUTHOR Jessup, John E., Jr.: Coakley, Robert W. TITLE A Guide to the Study and use of Military History. INSTITUTION Army Center of Military History, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 79 NOTE 497p.: Photographs on pages 331-336 were removed by ERIC due to poor reproducibility. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 ($6.50). EDRS PRICE MF02/PC20 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *History: military Personnel: *Military Science: *Military Training: Study Guides ABSTRACT This study guide On military history is intended for use with the young officer just entering upon a military career. There are four major sections to the guide. Part one discusses the scope and value of military history, presents a perspective on military history; and examines essentials of a study program. The study of military history has both an educational and a utilitarian value. It allows soldiers to look upon war as a whole and relate its activities to the periods of peace from which it rises and to which it returns. Military history also helps in developing a professional frame of mind and, in the leadership arena, it shows the great importance of character and integrity. In talking about a study program, the guide says that reading biographies of leading soldiers or statesmen is a good way to begin the study of military history. The best way to keep a study program current is to consult some of the many scholarly historical periodicals such as the "American Historical Review" or the "Journal of Modern History." Part two, which comprises almost half the guide, contains a bibliographical essay on military history, including great military historians and philosophers, world military history, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (15Mb)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/67105 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Never To Be Disclosed: Government Secrecy in Britain 1945 - 1975 by Christopher R. Moran BA, MA A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History University of Warwick, Department of History September 2008 CONTENTS Acknowledgements iv Docwadoo v Abbrenaaons vii Introduction INever to Be Disclosed 1 Chapter 11The Official Secrets Act: Genesis and Evolution 21 1.1 1850- 1889 22 1.21890-1920 35 Conclusions 43 Chapter 21A Silent Service: The Culture of Civil Service Secrecy 45 2.1Anonymity and Neutrality 50 2.2Security Routines 55 2.3"The Official Secrets Act Affects You!" 71 2.4 Raising the Curtain? 75 Conclusions 91 Chapter 31 Harry 'Chapman' Pincher: Sleuthing the Secret State 93 3.11945-1964 97 3.2The D-Notice Affair 107 3.31967-1975 124 Conclusions 132 Chapter 41The Riddle of the Frogman: The Crabb Affair, Secrecy and Cold War Culture 135 4.1 Disappearance 138 4.2 Conspiracy and Popular Culture 144 4.3Operation Claret 149 4.4 Backwash 156 Conclusions 159 Chapter 51Light in Dark Comers: Intelligence Memoirs and Official History
    [Show full text]