DOCSLIB.ORG

Promotion Exam Part ‘B’ Mil History 2015-16

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Promotion Exam Part ‘B’ Mil History 2015-16 The information given in this document is not to be communicated either directly or indirectly to the press or to any person not holding an official position in the service of the Government of India/ State Government of the Union of India. PROMOTION EXAM PART ‘B’ MIL HISTORY 2015-16 COMPILED & PUBLISHED BY THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF MILITARY TRAINING (MT-2) INTEGRATED HEADQUARTERS OF MoD (ARMY) INDEX MILITARY HISTORY : PART ‘B’ EXAM (2015-16) Ser Chapter Page No From To 1. Syllabus i ii PART - I : BATTLE OF ARNHEM 2. Background 02 02 3. Operation Market Garden 03 08 4. The air armada 09 17 5. The vital hours 18 26 6. Formation of Oosterbeek perimeter : 20 Sep 27 34 7. Evacuation 35 36 8. Aftermath 37 38 9. Reasons for failure 39 40 10. Lessons learnt 41 42 11. Conclusion 43 43 PART - II : OP DEADSTICK - CAPTURE OF PEGASUS BRIDGE 12. Background 45 48 13. Prep & plg for the Op 49 54 14. Airborne ops on D-day 55 58 15. Aftermath 59 59 16. Conclusion 60 60 17. Lessons learnt 61 62 PART - III : BIOGRAPHY - MAJOR JOHN HOWARD, DSO 18. The Early Years 63 65 19. Personal and Military Traits 65 69 20. Life After the War 69 69 i SYALLABI FOR PROMOTION EXAMINATION PART 'B' : MIL HISTORY (2015) (WRITTEN) Ser Subject Total Pass Time Syllabus Remarks/ No Marks Marks Allowed Recommended Study 1. Military 500 200 3 hr Aim. The aim of Military History paper is to 1. The topics for Military History History test the candidates‟ ability to draw lessons from paper would be promulgated by the prescribed campaigns and biographical DGMT (MT-2) in a block of four studies and apply these to contemporary and years. This would also include the future war situations. books to be read for each topic. The topics to be changed each year. The DETAILS OF SYLLABUS topics of Military History would be revised after every four years. 1. Military Campaign. The study 2. Philosophy of Selection. should including the following :- The philosophy of selecting the topic (a) Military Geography of the would be as under :- theatre. (a) The topic selected (b) Application of Principles of War. should be commensurate (c) Major Tactical Battles. It to the knowledge level and should include :- service maturity. (i) Planning of unit level (b) Lessons. Officers battles and combat should draw lessons application. which they can apply (ii) Conduct of operation immediate or in the including battle array of units. immediate future, in their (iii) Small team operations. respective service levels. (iv) Lessons learnt at sub- 3. Selection of Topic. One unit / unit level. campaign (with two specific battles) (v) Operations logistics and one related biography. challenges and solutions. 4. Reference material issued by (vi) Relevance in today‟s DGMT (MT-2). context at unit level. (vii) Unconventional / innovative concepts and procedures adopted including out-of-box thinking. (d) Human Element. Highlights of tactical battles amplifying following issues :- (i) Junior Leadership. (ii) Personal courage and sacrifice. (iii) Espirit-de-Corps. (iv) Morale. (v) Training at sub-unit level. (vi) Human elements. 2. Biographical Study. To include the following :- (a) Background, early life, self and formal training. (b) Junior leadership traits evident / development during formative years. (c) Personality and their affect on their command at sub unit/ unit level. (d) Leadership and command techniques at unit / sub-unit level and their relevance in today‟s context. ii Ser Subject Total Pass Time Syllabus Remarks/ No Marks Marks Allowed Recommended Study 3. Junior Leadership. Aspects amplifying following issues :- (a) Man management. (b) Officer-men relationship. (c) Welfare of troops. (d) Human psychology. (e) Morale. (f) Motivation. (g) Efficiency including time management. (h) Physical and moral courage. (j) Espirit-de-corps. (k) Self discipline. (l) Truthfulness. (m) Honour code. (n) Junior leadership traits. (o) Tactical acumen. 1 BATTLE OF ARNHEM (17TH SEP - 26TH SEP 1944) Four months after the allies had landed at Normandy the German army was rapidly retreating from France. British Field Marshal Montgomery’s audacious plan to drive deep into the heart of industrial Germany relied on British and American paratroopers to capture and hold vital bridges over the Rhine until relieved by reinforcements. The key to success would rest on British 1stAirborne Division at Arnhem. ULTIMATELY IT WAS A BRIDGE TOO FAR 2 CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND 1. Background. By September 1944, the Second World War had almost reached a conclusion. The Allied armies had rapidly pushed the disorganized Germans almost completely out of France and Belgium, and it was here that the front line stood, several miles short of the Dutch border. This rapid advance had caused the Allies crippling supply problems and despite their best efforts, all the armies did not have the resources to keep advancing at their present pace. Given the view that the Germans were almost at the point of collapse, it was agreed that a single army should be given priority of the supplies to enact a plan that would deal the final blow and win the war before the end of 1944. This honour fell to Field Marshal Montgomery and his 2nd British Army. Montgomery proposed a highly ambitious plan to fly three divisions of glider and parachute troops (35,000 men) and land them in various parts of Holland to capture no less than five key bridges. British tanks would simultaneously break through the front line and link up with the Airborne Divisions one by one to properly secure these bridges. Once they were all taken, there would then be no further river obstacles between the British and Germany, and a quick conclusion to the war would surely follow. The plan, the largest airborne assault in the history of warfare, was codenamed Operation Market Garden. D-Day was set for Sunday, 17th September. 2. Operation Comet. Montgomery desperately tried to persuade Eisenhower to agree to a number of plans that he felt would achieve this, one of these was given the codename Operation Comet. The plan was to drop the elite 1st British Airborne Division by parachute and glider into Holland to capture the five key bridges in and around the towns of Eindhoven, Nijmegen and Arnhem. The 2nd British Army would then break through the German front line and advance the sixty four miles to the River Rhine at Arnhem, properly securing each of the bridges as they went. Once the final bridge at Arnhem had been reached, there would be no more river obstacles standing between the 2nd British Army and Germany. Montgomery then wished to advance on Berlin and seize it from under the noses of the Russians, but with the great distances that this involved it was considered far too cavalier a move to be possible. Eisenhower, however, was persuaded of the merit of capturing the Dutch bridges and so gave his consent to Operation Comet. It was to have been launched on 9th September, but Comet was cancelled shortly before takeoff as it became apparent that it was asking too much of a single division to capture and defend so many bridges over such an expanse of territory. It is widely accepted that if Comet had taken place then it would have been a complete disaster for all concerned. 3. The plan was not dead, however. Instead it was renamed Operation Market Garden and the number of airborne troops involved was dramatically increased with the addition of the American 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions. The plan was essentially the same, except that the bridges in the Eindhoven and Nijmegen areas became the responsibility of the 101st and 82nd Airborne respectively, allowing the 1st Airborne Division to concentrate on the bridges at Arnhem. At the moment that these troops began to land on their drop zones, the 2nd British Army, with XXX Corps in the lead, would then drive with all speed to Arnhem, linking up with the airborne troops in turn. Success at Arnhem would enable the 2nd British Army to begin an encircling movement from the north whilst the 1st US Army did likewise from the south. If the Ruhr was captured, Germany's production capabilities would collapse and it was believed that the war would be over before the end of 1944. 3 CHAPTER 2 OPERATION MARKET GARDEN 1. Operation Market (Market being the codename for the airborne phase of the plan, Garden being that of the ground forces) involved a high degree of risk for all the units involved. The danger was particularly severe for the 1st Airborne Division landing at Arnhem, sixty four miles into German territory, because their fate largely depended upon the success of others. If the Americans, landing to the south, failed to capture any one of their major bridges, then all of the estimated eleven thousand nine hundred men of the 1st Airborne Division and its attached units would likely be cut off from friendly forces and inevitably captured. Even an unusually long delay in the arrival of the relieving ground forces could result in the same fate. ALLIED FORCES PROGRESS OF OPS : SEP 1944 4 2. The Plan. (a) Forces. The 1st Airborne Division consisted of three infantry brigades and assorted support units such as artillery, engineers, pathfinders etc. Due to the insufficient number of transport aircraft available, the first lift on Sunday, 17th September would see only the following units transported to Arnhem: the 1st Parachute Brigade, the glider borne 1st Airlanding Brigade (less two companies of the 2nd South Staffordshires), Major General Urquhart's Divisional Headquarters, and approximately half of the divisional units, including two of the three artillery batteries of the 1st Airlanding Light Regiment, and the 1st Airborne Reconnaissance Squadron.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II
    LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II ORREST LEE “WOODY” VOSLER of Lyndonville, Quick Write New York, was a radio operator and gunner during F World War ll. He was the second enlisted member of the Army Air Forces to receive the Medal of Honor. Staff Sergeant Vosler was assigned to a bomb group Time and time again we read about heroic acts based in England. On 20 December 1943, fl ying on his accomplished by military fourth combat mission over Bremen, Germany, Vosler’s servicemen and women B-17 was hit by anti-aircraft fi re, severely damaging it during wartime. After reading the story about and forcing it out of formation. Staff Sergeant Vosler, name Vosler was severely wounded in his legs and thighs three things he did to help his crew survive, which by a mortar shell exploding in the radio compartment. earned him the Medal With the tail end of the aircraft destroyed and the tail of Honor. gunner wounded in critical condition, Vosler stepped up and manned the guns. Without a man on the rear guns, the aircraft would have been defenseless against German fi ghters attacking from that direction. Learn About While providing cover fi re from the tail gun, Vosler was • the development of struck in the chest and face. Metal shrapnel was lodged bombers during the war into both of his eyes, impairing his vision. Able only to • the development of see indistinct shapes and blurs, Vosler never left his post fi ghters during the war and continued to fi re.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    10609-04 Auger 2/6/04 10:35 AM Page 47 MARTIN F. AUGER ‘A Tempest in a Teapot’: Canadian Military Planning and the St. Pierre and Miquelon Affair, 1940-1942 THE SMALL FRENCH COLONY OF ST. PIERRE AND MIQUELON, located some 32 kilometers off the south shore of Newfoundland, was a source of great concern for the Canadian government during the Second World War.1 When Nazi Germany defeated France in June 1940, the fate of the French Empire became uncertain. Canada and other Allied countries feared that French colonies might be used by the Germans to conduct military operations against them. The proximity of St. Pierre and Miquelon to Canada and the British colony of Newfoundland constituted a major threat. Negotiations immediately ensued between the American, British and Canadian governments as to the future of France’s territories in the Western Hemisphere. The main argument was whether or not the French islands needed to be occupied by Allied military forces. The issue, however, was solved in December 1941 when the Free French movement of General Charles de Gaulle sent a small naval task force to rally the archipelago to the Allied cause. Most historians who have analyzed the St. Pierre and Miquelon affair of 1940 to 1942 have focused upon the Free French takeover. Although some historians have studied Canada’s role in the affair from a diplomatic perspective, none have provided an in-depth analysis of Canadian military planning during this crisis.2 It is now clear that Canada undertook significant planning to launch an invasion. An understanding of the details of Canada’s invasion plan and the ultimate decision to postpone military action illuminates the changing structure of Canada’s relations with Great Britiain and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ambiguous Partnership: Great Britain and the Free French Navy, 1940-19421
    An Ambiguous Partnership: Great Britain and the Free French Navy, 1940-19421 Hugues Canuel On se souvient aujourd’hui des forces de la France libre en raison de faits d’armes tels que leur courageuse résistance à Bir Hakeim en 1942 et la participation du général Leclerc à la libération de Paris en 1944. Par contre, la contribution antérieure de la marine de la France libre est moins bien connue : elle a donné à de Gaulle, dont l’espoir était alors bien mince, les moyens de mobiliser des appuis politiques au sein de l’empire colonial français et d’apporter une contribution militaire précoce à la cause des Alliés. Cette capacité s’est développée à la suite de l’appui modeste mais tout de même essentiel du Royaume-Uni, un allié qui se méfiait de fournir les ressources absolument nécessaires à une flotte qu’il ne contrôlait pas complètement mais dont les actions pourraient aider la Grande- Bretagne qui se trouvait alors presque seule contre les puissances de l’Axe. Friday 27 November 1942 marked the nadir of French sea power in the twentieth century. Forewarned that German troops arrayed around the Mediterranean base of Toulon were intent on seizing the fleet at dawn, Admiral Jean de Laborde – Commander of the Force de Haute Mer, the High Seas Force – and the local Maritime Prefect, Vice Admiral André Marquis, ordered the immediate scuttling of all ships and submarines at their berths. Some 248,800 tons of capital ships, escorts, auxiliaries and submarines was scuttled as the Wehrmacht closed in on the dockyard.2 The French “Vichy navy” virtually ceased to exist that day.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Quality of This Reproduction Is
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMZ films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter &ce, while others nuy be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the qualityof the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the origina!, b^inning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overiaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell ft Howdl Infbnnatioa Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Aitor MI 4SI06-I346 USA 313/761-4700 «00/321-0600 THE PRICE OF DREAMS: A HISTORY OF ADVERTISING IN FRANCE. 1927-1968 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Clark Eric H ultquist, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribute to the Life of Jack Grayburn. Preface
    A Tribute to The Life of Jack Grayburn. Preface. To be President of our great rugby club is an honour and a privilege, especially so when one considers the many illustrious members in our 90 odd years of history. We live now in very different times. The first members of Chiltern RFC will have experienced, some at first hand the almost unbearably tragic events of the World War 1. As the club grew in the 1930s the shadow of war once again fell over Europe and men such as Jack Grayburn knew what could befall them should another conflict unfold. It is difficult for us now to comprehend the sacrifices that war dictates, the destruction of families, communities, a way of life. But those Chiltern rugby players in the late 1930s must have known what might be expected of them, and must have trusted that they would rise to the challenge, and must have known that some of them would not return. Our honours board at the club has 22 names on it, a club with perhaps 60 playing members in 1939. This ratio speaks for itself, a number that is shocking and humbling; and however many times this refrain is repeated it is no less true: they died so that we might have a future, a future to enjoy the manifold benefits of a good life in a free society. And surely each one of those Chiltern players who went to war and did not return would rejoice that our club continues and is in fine shape, upholding the same values, embodying all that is best in sport and comradeship.
    [Show full text]
  • To Revel in God's Sunshine
    To Revel in God’s Sunshine The Story of RSM J C Lord MVO MBE Compiled by Richard Alford and Colleagues of RSM J C Lord © R ALFORD 1981 First Edition Published in 1981 Second Edition Published Electronically in 2013 Cover Pictures Front - Regimental Sergeant Major J C Lord in front of the Grand Entrance to the Old Building, Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. Rear - Army Core Values To Revel in God’s Sunshine The Story of the Army Career of the late Academy Sergeant Major J.C. Lord MVO MBE As related by former Recruits, Cadets, Comrades and Friends Compiled by Richard Alford (2nd Edition - Edited by Maj P.E. Fensome R IRISH and Lt Col (Retd) A.M.F. Jelf) John Lord firmly believed the words of Emerson: “Trust men and they will be true to you. Treat them greatly and they will show themselves great.” Dedicated to SOLDIERS SOLDIERS WHO TRAIN SOLDIERS SOLDIERS WHO LEAD SOLDIERS The circumstances of many contributors to this book will have changed during the course of research and publication, and apologies are extended for any out of date information given in relation to rank and appointment. i John Lord when Regimental Sergeant Major The Parachute Regiment Infantry Training Centre ii CONTENTS 2ND EDITION Introduction General Sir Peter Wall KCB CBE ADC Gen – CGS v Foreword WO1 A.J. Stokes COLDM GDS – AcSM R M A Sandhurst vi Editor’s Note Major P.E Fensome R IRISH vii To Revel in God’s Sunshine Introduction The Royal British Legion Annual Parade at R.M.A Sandhurst viii Chapter 1 The Grenadier Guards, Brighton Police Force 1 Chapter 2 Royal Military College, Sandhurst.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Overlord James Clinton Emmert Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2002 Operation overlord James Clinton Emmert Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Emmert, James Clinton, "Operation overlord" (2002). LSU Master's Theses. 619. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/619 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OPERATION OVERLORD A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Arts in The Interdepartmental Program in Liberal Arts by James Clinton Emmert B.A., Louisiana State University, 1996 May 2002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been completed without the support of numerous persons. First, I would never have been able to finish if I had not had the help and support of my wife, Esther, who not only encouraged me and proofed my work, but also took care of our newborn twins alone while I wrote. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Stanley Hilton, who spent time helping me refine my thoughts about the invasion and whose editing skills helped give life to this paper. Finally, I would like to thank the faculty of Louisiana State University for their guidance and the knowledge that they shared with me.
    [Show full text]
  • D-DAY in NORMANDY Speaker: Walter A. Viali, PMP Company
    D-DAY IN NORMANDY Speaker: Walter A. Viali, PMP Company: PMO To Go LLC Website: www.pmotogo.com Welcome to the PMI Houston Conference & Expo and Annual Job Fair 2015 • Please put your phone on silent mode • Q&A will be taken at the close of this presentation • There will be time at the end of this presentation for you to take a few moments to complete the session survey. We value your feedback which allows us to improve this annual event. 1 D-DAY IN NORMANDY The Project Management Challenges of the “Longest Day” Walter A. Viali, PMP PMO To Go LLC WALTER A. VIALI, PMP • Worked with Texaco in Rome, Italy and in Houston, Texas for 25 years and “retired” in 1999. • Multiple PMO implementations throughout the world since 1983. • On the speaker circuit since 1987. • PMI member since 1998, became a PMP in 1999. • Co-founder of PMO To Go LLC (2002). • PMI Houston Chapter Board Member from 2002 to 2008 and its President in 2007. • PMI Clear Lake - Galveston Board Member in 2009-2010. • PMI Region 6 Mentor (2011-2014). • Co-author of “Accelerating Change with OPM” (2013). • Project Management Instructor for UH College of Technology. 3 Project Management and Leadership in History 4 More than 9,000 of our boys rest in this foreign land they helped liberate! ‹#› 5 WHAT WAS D-DAY? • In the early morning hours of June 6, 1944, American, British, and Canadian troops launched an attack by sea, landing on the beaches of Normandy on the northern coast of Nazi-occupied France.
    [Show full text]
  • Pegasus Bridge
    Pegasus Bridge 6 June, 1944 by Stephen E. Ambrose Introduction This book is the result of some 24 interviews, conducted between September and December, 1983, in Canada, England, France and Germany. At that time I had just completed some twenty years of work on Dwight Eisenhower, during which period I examined something over two million documents. In my next book I wanted to work from an entirely different kind of source material. I have always been impressed by the work of the American military writer S. L. A. Marshall, especially by his use of post-combat interviews to determine what actually happened on the battlefield. My thought was, Why not do a post-combat interview forty years after the event? Even taking into account all the tricks that memory plays, I felt that for many of the participants, D-Day was the great day of their lives, stamped forever in their memories. I knew that was the case with Eisenhower, who went on to two full terms as President, but who always looked back on D-Day as his greatest day, and could remember the most surprising details. I also wanted to come down from the dizzying heights of the Supreme Commander and the President to the company level, where the action is. Further, I wanted a company that was unusual and that played a crucial role, Pegasus Bridge was an obvious choice. So I set out. My recorded interviews with John Howard took twenty hours, spread over a period of some weeks. I got almost ten hours of tape from Jim Wallwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Market Garden WWII
    Operation Market Garden WWII Operation Market Garden (17–25 September 1944) was an Allied military operation, fought in the Netherlands and Germany in the Second World War. It was the largest airborne operation up to that time. The operation plan's strategic context required the seizure of bridges across the Maas (Meuse River) and two arms of the Rhine (the Waal and the Lower Rhine) as well as several smaller canals and tributaries. Crossing the Lower Rhine would allow the Allies to outflank the Siegfried Line and encircle the Ruhr, Germany's industrial heartland. It made large-scale use of airborne forces, whose tactical objectives were to secure a series of bridges over the main rivers of the German- occupied Netherlands and allow a rapid advance by armored units into Northern Germany. Initially, the operation was marginally successful and several bridges between Eindhoven and Nijmegen were captured. However, Gen. Horrocks XXX Corps ground force's advance was delayed by the demolition of a bridge over the Wilhelmina Canal, as well as an extremely overstretched supply line, at Son, delaying the capture of the main road bridge over the Meuse until 20 September. At Arnhem, the British 1st Airborne Division encountered far stronger resistance than anticipated. In the ensuing battle, only a small force managed to hold one end of the Arnhem road bridge and after the ground forces failed to relieve them, they were overrun on 21 September. The rest of the division, trapped in a small pocket west of the bridge, had to be evacuated on 25 September. The Allies had failed to cross the Rhine in sufficient force and the river remained a barrier to their advance until the offensives at Remagen, Oppenheim, Rees and Wesel in March 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaef-Sgs-Records.Pdf
    363.6 DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS SUPREME HEADQUARTERS, ALLIED EXPEDITIONARY FORCE, OFFICE OF SECRETARY, GENERAL STAFF: Records, 1943-45 [microfilm] Accession 71-14 Processed by: DJH Date completed: June 1991 The microfilm of the records of the Secretary of the General Staff, Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force, was sent to the Eisenhower Library by the Modern Military Records Division of the National Archives in September 1969. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 4 Number of reels of microfilm: 62 Literary rights in the SHAEF records are in the public domain. These records were processed in accordance with the general restrictions on access to government records as set forth by the National Archives. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) was a joint U.S. - British military organization created in England in February 1944 to carry out the invasion of Western Europe. Dwight D. Eisenhower, an officer of the United States Army, was appointed Supreme Allied Commander. Eisenhower organized his staff along U.S. military lines with separate staff sections devoted to personnel (G-1), intelligence (G-2), operations (G-3), logistics (G-4) and civilian affairs (G-5). The most significant files at SHAEF were kept in the Office of the Secretary of the General Staff (SGS). The SGS office served as a type of central file for SHAEF. The highest-level documents that received the personal attention of the Supreme Allied Commander and the Chief of Staff usually ended up in the SGS files. Many of the staff sections and administrative offices at SHAEF retired material to the SGS files.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Structures – a Background Note
    1 Military Structures – A Background Note The army or navy unit in which a man served is stated in his biography. The following ranks are found among our Amersham servicemen: Officers: sub-lieutenant; lieutenant; second lieutenant. Other ranks: company sergeant major; sergeant; corporal; bombardier; lance corporal; guardsman; private; trooper; sapper; gunner; rifleman; driver; able seaman. Our men served in many different units. Naturally, more served in the county infantry regiment – the Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry (OBLI) – than in any other military formation. Some were in specialised formations or corps such as artillery and engineers. Many of our Amersham men served in more than one unit. Transfers from one to another were made for many reasons, including promotions. Casualties were so numerous that some regiments and battalions virtually ceased to exist and survivors were transferred to other units. Some new battalions were created with men from battalions which were no longer large enough to continue as separate fighting forces. A few of our men were regular soldiers or in the reserves, e.g. Thomas George Irons and William John Slade both joined the 1st Battalion OBLI in around 1909. At the outbreak of the war the British Army was composed entirely of regular, volunteer soldiers: there were no conscripts as there were in the armies and reserves of most continental countries. The Territorial Force (TF) was composed largely of men who had served some years full-time in the army. The so-called ‘First Line’ units were men who had undertaken a commitment to serve abroad. In the ‘Second Line’ units no such commitment had been given; however, when in 1916 conscription was brought in by law, all men were deemed to have agreed to serve outside the UK.
    [Show full text]