Download the Entire Research Europe Article Here

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download the Entire Research Europe Article Here Updated daily at www.ResearchResearch.com 20 November 2014 Geoghegan-Quinn leaves mixed legacy – p13 ERA Less is more, or is it? – p5 Archiving Cologne collection’s comeback after construction collapse – p6 Commission bids Glover a silent farewell Researchers call for clarification as CSA post is left to expire A TENSE RELATIONSHIP between the European by Laura Greenhalgh [email protected] Commission and the chief scientific adviser to its pres- ident ended in unceremonious fashion this month, as work,” said Mark Downs, the chief executive of the Anne Glover was quietly relieved of her duties. UK’s Society of Biology. Glover’s mandate as CSA expired with the tenure Others linked Glover’s departure to her support for of president José Manuel Barroso on 31 October, but genetic modification, following a campaign by envi- her contract with the Commission lasts until February. ronmental groups to have the CSA post abolished. But However, on 11 November, she received an email according to Wilsdon: “Characterising this as some informing her that the function of the CSA had ceased sort of anti-science agenda from the Juncker presi- to exist, meaning she was free to leave if she wished. dency is incorrect—there’s no evidence of that.” Glover’s departure was expected, but many observers On 14 November, the European Academies Science were hoping that the incoming president Jean-Claude Advisory Council asked Juncker to clarify his inten- Juncker would appoint an immediate successor. tions. This was echoed in a statement from Paul Nurse, Instead, they say, the developments show that science the president of the UK’s Royal Society, who said: “If advice is not high on Juncker’s agenda. “It’s a combi- the Commission has a plausible plan for ensuring that nation of indifference and being too busy—it’s a low scientific evidence will be taken seriously, it needs priority,” says James Wilsdon, of the Science Policy to start sharing it with people soon, otherwise it will Research Unit at the UK’s University of Sussex. encourage those who portray the Commission as out This conclusion is seemingly supported by the of touch and not willing to listen to informed advice.” explanation from a Commission spokeswoman, who Some believe that Glover’s position should be rein- says that the CSA post has “simply expired” and the stated, but others argue that the Anglo-American president has “not yet decided” how to deal with inde- model of an individual CSA is not tenable in Europe, pendent scientific advice. where committees are usually employed to offer col- According to a Brussels source, Glover sent numer- lective advice at both the national and EU levels. ous messages to Juncker after he was elected to make “Europe is not a single monarchy, and if you don’t the case for the CSA post to be continued, including have a network you cannot accomplish much,” says requests for meetings. However, she received no reply. Jerzy Langer, a member of the Polish Academy of This illustrates the frosty nature of the relationship Sciences. “Glover is a superb individual, but she didn’t between the CSA and the Commission—a matter on have much influence.” which Glover has spoken frankly in recent months. Both options remain open to Juncker. “The way “The most worrying aspect of this was the cur- he formulated the email to Anne leaves him plenty of sory way in which it was dealt with,” says Wilsdon. “I room to say: ‘I never said there wouldn’t be a CSA’,” thought they might take longer to reach a decision, says the Brussels source. “He could claim there’s been and spend time talking to people. But Juncker refused a huge misunderstanding.” to engage in a serious way with Glover, which strikes It is also possible that Juncker me as utterly self-defeating.” will do nothing, believing he has the Every new opportunity As the news broke, research leaders expressed their right structures in place already. “He for research funding annoyance that the CSA post was not being renewed. could just ignore it, as he has ignored from every sponsor in the EU, US & beyond “This sends a signal that science and its role in policy- all previous debates on the CSA, and making has been downgraded at a time when Europe delay a decision until nobody’s asking Independent news needs to do all it can to support innovation through for it any more,” says the source. “It’s Direct from Brussels an effective, realist and evidence-led policy frame- a very popular political tactic.” Issue No. 398 2 editorial Research Europe, 20 November 2014 Edited by Colin Macilwain [email protected] Tel: +44 20 7216 6500 Fax: +44 20 7216 6501 Unit 111, 134-146 Curtain Road, London EC2A 3AR elsewhere “It would be good to find something Wrong rift totally unexpected.” Fabiola Gianotti, the next director-general of the particle physics laboratory Cern, sets her first goal. Horizon Magazine, 7/11/14. Anguish over losing the chief scientific adviser is “Proposals are only useful if they are largely confined to one side of the English Channel adopted, accepted and implemented properly on the ground.” The European Commission’s vice-president The departure of Anne Glover as chief scientific adviser to the president Frans Timmermans explains why the of the European Commission has been widely and unsympathetically por- Commission will collaborate with the European Parliament from the outset on trayed, at least in the UK media, as a symptom of anti-science sentiment future work programmes. Pan-European on the part of the Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker. Networks, 12/11/14. Scientific leaders who worked with Glover are understandably disap- pointed that the role hasn’t been retained. Some say that Juncker’s team “Those who fit in the category of ‘good sci- entists’ in the current peer-review-based doesn’t care about research, or that it takes issue with Glover’s well-publi- evaluation criteria may not always be so.” cised views, criticised by environmentalists, on genetically modified crops. Guillermo Orts-Gil, who leads a Max Planck nanotechnology research group in Germany, Neither assertion rings true. Research is more prominent in the EU’s says citizen engagement may soon equal budget plan—which Juncker was instrumental in framing as head of the citation rates in evaluations of job Eurogroup—than ever before. There is nothing in his public statements or performance. Euroscientist, 12/11/14. his reputation at the European Parliament (or back home in Luxembourg) “No must mean no.” to suggest that he carries any anti-science agenda in the sense of reject- European Green party spokesman Bart Staes ing scientific evidence in policy-making on ideological grounds. says it’s important for member states to have the right to opt out of trials of genetically And the idea that Juncker, a mainstream, pro-business conservative, modified crops. EurActiv, 12/11/14. is dropping Glover at the behest of the Greens is almost laughable. It is a fantasy to think that a handful of popular but poorly financed pressure “We definitely need to improve the tech- nology in all different energy sectors.” groups such as Greenpeace could hold such sway in Brussels. Giovanni De Santi, director of the Joint It is true that Glover made trouble for herself by taking a strident pub- Research Centre’s energy research institute, lic position on the issue of GM crops, which deeply divides EU member says the 2015 Strategic Energy Technology Plan should not attempt to prioritise too states. She struggled to acknowledge the case against the technology, much. Science Business, 13/11/14. last year describing it unhelpfully to The Scotsman as “a form of mad- ness”. Perhaps as a laboratory biologist, she was simply unaware of the “Maybe today we didn’t just land once, but twice.” powerful ecological arguments against GM crops. If so, her misunder- European Space Agency project manager standing may inadvertently demonstrate one of the reasons the CSA post Stephan Ulamec says a small bounce explains is not being renewed. the confusion about whether the Philae Different nations around the world have traditionally taken very differ- comet probe had landed. Science, 12/11/14. ent approaches to receiving scientific and technical advice. The concept “It is never entirely clear what the of a single CSA is essentially an Anglo-American one. The idea has never numbers really mean, especially in light of endemic corruption and misconduct.” taken root in France, Germany or any other major European nation, and Richard Suttmeier, a researcher of Chinese has not been employed in China or Japan. policy at the University of Oregon in the The idea of a single, politically appointed figurehead for science and United States, says reports that China may outspend the US on R&D by 2020 may be technology advice does not sit well with federalism or with the concept exaggerated. Nature, 12/11/14. of a democracy in which everyone should be allowed a voice. In Germany, for example, the influential Wissenschaftsrat is painstakingly constructed to reflect various different perspectives from all parts of the country. decade Everyone in Brussels is all too familiar with the infuriating tendency of the British to assume that theirs is the best way of doing things and “The research market is very that they are enduring any different approaches within the EU almost on sufferance. far away from being open.” Since Glover’s appointment by José Manuel Barroso in 2011, the onus Peter Nijkamp, chairman of the has been on advocates of the CSA approach to show that it can be genu- Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, says national research councils inely representative and effective.
Recommended publications
  • Fabiola Gianotti
    Fabiola Gianotti Date of Birth 29 October 1960 Place Rome, Italy Nomination 18 August 2020 Field Physics Title Director-General of the European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CERN, Geneva Most important awards, prizes and academies Honorary Professor, University of Edinburgh; Corresponding or foreign associate member of the Italian Academy of Sciences (Lincei), the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, the French Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society London, the Royal Academy of Sciences and Arts of Barcelona, the Royal Irish Academy and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Honorary doctoral degrees from: University of Uppsala (2012); Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (2013); McGill University, Montreal (2014); University of Oslo (2014); University of Edinburgh (2015); University of Roma Tor Vergata (2017); University of Chicago (2018); University Federico II, Naples (2018); Université de Paris Sud, Orsay (2018); Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Annecy (2018); Weizmann Institute, Israel (2018); Imperial College, London (2019). National honours: Cavaliere di Gran Croce dell'Ordine al Merito della Repubblica, awarded by the Italian President Giorgio Napolitano (2014). Special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics (shared, 2013); Enrico Fermi Prize of the Italian Physical Society (shared, 2013); Medal of Honour of the Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen (2013); Wilhelm Exner Medal, Vienna (2017); Tate Medal of the American Institute of Physics for International Leadership (2019). Summary of scientific research Fabiola Gianotti is a particle physicist working at high-energy accelerators. In her scientific career, she has made significant contributions to several experiments at CERN, including UA2 at the proton-antiproton collider (SpbarpS), ALEPH at the Large Electron-Positron collider (LEP) and ATLAS at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
    [Show full text]
  • Calorimetry for Particle Physics
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, VOLUME 75, OCTOBER 2003 Calorimetry for particle physics Christian W. Fabjan and Fabiola Gianotti CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland (Published 15 October 2003) Calorimetry has become a well-understood, powerful, and versatile measurement method. Besides perfecting this technique to match increasingly demanding operation at high-energy particle accelerators, physicists are developing low-temperature calorimeters to extend detection down to ever lower energies, and atmospheric and deep-sea calorimeters to scrutinize the universe up to the highest energies. The authors summarize the state of the art, with emphasis on the physics of the detectors and innovative technologies. CONTENTS VI. Citius, Altius, Fortius 1280 A. Introduction 1280 B. Atmospheric calorimeters 1280 I. Introduction 1243 1. Setting the energy scale 1283 II. Electromagnetic Calorimetry 1244 2. Energy resolution 1283 A. Physics of the electromagnetic cascade 1244 C. Deep-water calorimeters 1283 B. Energy resolution of electromagnetic VII. Conclusions 1284 calorimeters 1246 Acknowledgments 1284 1. Stochastic term 1247 References 1284 2. Noise term 1247 3. Constant term 1247 4. Additional contributions 1248 C. Main techniques and examples of facilities 1249 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Homogeneous calorimeters 1249 a. Semiconductor calorimeters 1249 Calorimetry is an ubiquitous detection principle in b. Cherenkov calorimeters 1250 particle physics. Originally invented for the study of c. Scintillation calorimeters 1251 cosmic-ray phenomena, this method was developed and d. Noble-liquid calorimeters 1254 perfected for accelerator-based particle physics experi- 2. Sampling calorimeters 1256 mentation primarily in order to measure the energy of a. Scintillation sampling calorimeters 1257 electrons, photons, and hadrons. Calorimeters are b. Gas sampling calorimeters 1257 blocks of instrumented material in which particles to be c.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Paris, France the Movement Disorder Society’S 13Th International Congress of Parkinson’S Disease and Movement Disorders
    FINAL PROGRAM The Movement Disorder Society’s 13th International Congress OF PARKINSon’S DISEASE AND MOVEMENT DISORDERS JUNE 7-11, 2009 Paris, France The Movement Disorder Society’s 13th International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Claiming CME Credit To claim CME credit for your participation in the MDS 13th International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders, International Congress participants must complete and submit an online CME Request Form. This Form will be available beginning June 10. Instructions for claiming credit: • After June 10, visit www.movementdisorders.org/congress/congress09/cme • Log in following the instructions on the page. You will need your International Congress Reference Number, located on the upper right of the Confirmation Sheet found in your registration packet. • Follow the on-screen instructions to claim CME Credit for the sessions you attended. • You may print your certificate from your home or office, or save it as a PDF for your records. Continuing Medical Education The Movement Disorder Society is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Credit Designation The Movement Disorder Society designates this educational activity for a maximum of 30.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Non-CME Certificates of Attendance were included with your on- site registration packet. If you did not receive one, please e-mail [email protected] to request one. The Movement Disorder Society has sought accreditation from the European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME) to provide the following CME activity for medical specialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Materiality Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations
    Language and Materiality Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations Edited by Jillian R. Cavanaugh CUNY, New York Shalini Shankar Northwestern University University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia 4843/24, 2nd Floor, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi - 110002, India 79 Anson Road, #06-04/06, Singapore 079906 Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107180949 DOI: 10.1017/9781316848418 C Cambridge University Press 2017 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2017 Printed in <country> by <printer> A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISBN 978-1-107-18094-9 Hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. 4 Fontroversy! Or, How to Care about the Shape of Language Keith M. Murphy Introduction On July 4, 2012, standing in the well of a packed lecture hall on the cam- pus of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), just outside Geneva, particle physicist Joseph Incandela looked up at the hall’s projection screen and, with only a hint of nerves in his voice, uttered the following pro- nouncement: “If we combine the ZZ and gamma-gamma, this is what we get.
    [Show full text]
  • Prhep Hep2001
    International Europhysics Conference on HEP PROCEEDINGS Searches for new particles at Colliders Fabiola Gianotti∗ CERN, EP Division, 1211 Gen`eve 23, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Most recent results from the searches for new particles at LEP, Tevatron and PrHEP hep2001 HERA, presented at the 2001 Summer Conferences, are reviewed. Prospects at future machines (LHC and Linear Colliders) are also discussed. The emphasis is put on the quest for Higgs bosons, Supersymmetry, Extra-dimensions and Flavour-Changing Neu- tral Current processes. In each case, the phenomenological framework, the experimental strategies, and the analysis methods are described, and the sensitivity and reach of the various machines are compared. 1. Introduction The search for new particles is one of the most exciting, rapidly-evolving and prolific fields in today’s high-energy experimental physics, motivated also by a rich spectrum of theoretical scenarios and predictions. Over the last years, the three operational high-energy Colliders, LEP, Tevatron and HERA, have explored the few hundred GeV energy range and set stringent bounds on various models. In addition, recently LEP has reported an exciting 2σ hint in the search for a Standard Model (SM) Higgs boson of mass about 115 GeV, and the H1 experiment at HERA has observed an excess of W ’s produced in association with a high transverse momentum hadronic system. Since 1996, i.e. since the beginning of its phase two, LEP has delivered an integrated 1 luminosity of about 700 pb− per experiment at a centre-of-mass energy above the W -pair production threshold. The machine performance in terms of both energy and luminosity went beyond any optimistic expectation.
    [Show full text]
  • Université Joseph Fourier Les Houches Session LXXXVII 2007
    houches87cov.tex; 12/05/2008; 18:25 p. 1 1 Université Joseph Fourier 1 2 2 3 Les Houches 3 4 4 5 Session LXXXVII 5 6 6 7 2007 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 String Theory and the Real World: 15 16 16 17 From Particle Physics to Astrophysics 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 houches87cov.tex; 12/05/2008; 18:25 p. 2 1 Lecturers who contributed to this volume 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 I. Antoniadis 5 5 J.L.F. Barbón 6 6 Marcus K. Benna 7 7 Thibault Damour 8 8 Frederik Denef 9 9 F. Gianotti 10 10 G.F. Giudice 11 11 Kenneth Intriligator 12 12 Elias Kiritsis 13 13 Igor R. Klebanov 14 14 Marc Lilley 15 15 Juan M. Maldacena 16 16 Eliezer Rabinovici 17 17 Nathan Seiberg 18 18 Angel M. Uranga 19 19 Pierre Vanhove 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 houches87cov.tex; 12/05/2008; 18:25 p. 3 1 ÉCOLE D’ÉTÉ DE PHYSIQUE DES HOUCHES 1 2 2 3 SESSION LXXXVII, 2 JULY–27 JULY 2007 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 COLE THÉMATIQUE DU 7 É CNRS 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 STRING THEORY AND THE REAL WORLD: 15 16 16 17 FROM PARTICLE PHYSICS TO ASTROPHYSICS 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 Edited by 22 22 23 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Fabiola Gianotti: Brief Curriculum Vitae Fabiola Gianotti Received a Ph
    Dr. Fabiola Gianotti: Brief Curriculum Vitae Fabiola Gianotti received a Ph.D. in experimental particle physics from the University of Milano in 1989. Since 1994 she has been a research physicist at CERN, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research, and since August 2013 an honorary Professor at the University of Edinburgh. She is also a corresponding member of the Italian Academy of Sciences, foreign associate member of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States and of the French Academy of Sciences, honorary member of the Royal Irish Academy and Foreign Member of the Royal Society, London. Dr Gianotti has worked on several CERN experiments, being involved in detector R&D and construction, software development and data analysis. From March 2009 to February 2013 she held the elected position of project leader (”Spokesperson”) of the ATLAS experiment. The ATLAS Collaboration consists of 3000 physicists from some 38 countries. On 4 July 2012 she presented the ATLAS results on the search for the Higgs boson in an historic seminar at CERN. This event marked the announcement of the discovery of the Higgs boson by the ATLAS and CMS experiments. Dr Gianotti is the author or co-author of more than 550 publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals. She has given more than 40 invited plenary talks at the major international conferences in the field. She has been a member of several international committees, such as the Scientific Council of the CNRS (France), the Physics Advisory Committee of the Fermilab Laboratory (USA), the Council of the European Physical Society, the Scientific Council of the DESY Laboratory (Germany), the Scientific Advisory Committee of NIKHEF (Netherlands) and the Scientific Advisory Board of the UN Secretary-General, Mr Ban Ki- moon.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme 66Th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting 26 June – 1 July 2016 MEETING APP TABLE of CONTENTS
    Programme 66th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting 26 June – 1 July 2016 MEETING APP TABLE OF CONTENTS WANT TO STAY UP TO DATE? Download the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings App. Available in Android, iTunes and Windows app stores. (“Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings”) Scientific Programme page 8 About the Meetings page 32 • Up to date programme info & details • Session abstracts and Supporters poster abstracts page 36 • Ask questions during panel discussions • Participate in polls and Maps page 44 surveys • Interactive maps • Connect to other Good to Know page 52 participants • Social media integration Download the app (Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings) in Android, iTunes or Windows Phone app stores. Within the app, use the passphrase “darkmatter” to download the guide for the 66th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting. 2 3 WELCOME WELCOME The 66th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting is characterised by continuity and partners. Many of his strategic initiaves paved the way of the meetings into transition alike: a successful future. The members of the Lindau Council and Foundation are grateful for his years of dedicated service to Lindau’s Mission Education. Back in 1951, the driving intention of the founders Dr. Franz Karl Hein, Pro- fessor Dr. Gustav Wilhelm Parade and Count Lennart Bernadotte was the Every year, we are challenged by the young scientists to further increase vision that this gathering in Lindau, an island very close to its European interaction with Nobel Laureates, to provide more opportunities for young neighbours, could contribute to reconciliation after the second world war, students to present their work, and to enable even more exchange. A new and foster a peaceful and prosperous future.
    [Show full text]
  • Face to Face Face to Face with Dr Fabiola Gianotti
    Face to Face This section features conversations with personalities related to science, highlighting the factors and circumstances that guided them in making the career choice to be a scientist. Face to Face with Dr Fabiola Gianotti∗ Prof K Indulekha talks to Dr Fabiola Gianotti Dr Fabiola Gianotti is a renowned particle physicist, and the first woman Director-General of CERN, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research. She also holds the rare distinction of being the first Director-General to be appointed for a full second term. A specialist in particle physics, Gianotti has worked on several CERN experiments, being involved in detector R&D and construction, software development and data analysis. She has served as the elected project leader and spokesperson of the ATLAS experiment that famously resulted in the discovery of the Higgs Boson. Apart from the many honors and awards including the Special Breakthrough Prize in Funda- mental Physics of the Milner Foundation (2012), the Enrico Fermi Prize of the Italian Physical Society (2013), and the Medal of Honour of the Niels Bohr Institute of Copenhagen (2013), Gianotti has been included among the ‘Top 100 most inspirational women’ by The Guardian newspaper (UK, 2011). She was ranked 5th in Time magazine’s Personality of the Year (USA, 2012), included among the ‘Top 100 most influential women’ by Forbes magazine (USA, 2013) and considered among the ‘Leading Global Thinkers of 2013’ by Foreign Policy magazine (USA, 2013). Members from the Editorial Board and the Editorial Office of Resonance had attended the special programs arranged at the Vigyan Samagam (Viswevsaraya Museum, Ben- galuru, 30th August 2019) in connection with the visit of Dr Fabiola Gianotti, Director- General CERN.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabriela Gonzalez
    Welcome to the CERN – Latin-American School of High-Energy Physics! Nick Ellis Director, CERN Schools of Physics CERN European Organisation for Particle Physics Research PLEASE! • Please put your mobile phones, tablets, etc. on Airplane mode! – We need to keep all the available internet bandwidth for the video link to CERN CERN • Based in Geneva, Switzerland – Spanning the Swiss-French border – More than 10000 users from all over the world, including Latin America • Home of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) – Colliding counter-rotating beams of protons to probe the fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions – Huge detector facilities (ALICE, ATLAS, CMS, LHCb) each built and used by many hundreds of physicists – Where the Higgs boson was discovered in 2012 by ATLAS and CMS • Nobel prize in 2013 for theorists who predicted it • Many challenges in engineering and informatics, often with spin-off relevant for society, e.g. – World-Wide Web – Medical applications: PET scanners, hadron therapy, .. – Also a driving force in Open Access publishing • The “E” in CERN (“European”) has become “Everywhere” History of this School • CERN – Latin-American Schools go back to 2001 – Modeled on European Schools started in 1960s • Previous Latin-American Schools – 2001 Brazil 2017 Mexico – 2003 Mexico – 2005 Argentina – 2007 Chile – 2009 Colombia – 2011 Brazil – 2013 Peru – 2015 Ecuador Organizers (those present at the School this morning) • International Organizing Committee members – Nick Ellis (Director, CERN Schools of Physics) – Martijn
    [Show full text]
  • Nov/Dec 2020
    CERNNovember/December 2020 cerncourier.com COURIERReporting on international high-energy physics WLCOMEE CERN Courier – digital edition ADVANCING Welcome to the digital edition of the November/December 2020 issue of CERN Courier. CAVITY Superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavities drive accelerators around the world, TECHNOLOGY transferring energy efficiently from high-power radio waves to beams of charged particles. Behind the march to higher SRF-cavity performance is the TESLA Technology Neutrinos for peace Collaboration (p35), which was established in 1990 to advance technology for a linear Feebly interacting particles electron–positron collider. Though the linear collider envisaged by TESLA is yet ALICE’s dark side to be built (p9), its cavity technology is already established at the European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser at DESY (a cavity string for which graces the cover of this edition) and is being applied at similar broad-user-base facilities in the US and China. Accelerator technology developed for fundamental physics also continues to impact the medical arena. Normal-conducting RF technology developed for the proposed Compact Linear Collider at CERN is now being applied to a first-of-a-kind “FLASH-therapy” facility that uses electrons to destroy deep-seated tumours (p7), while proton beams are being used for novel non-invasive treatments of cardiac arrhythmias (p49). Meanwhile, GANIL’s innovative new SPIRAL2 linac will advance a wide range of applications in nuclear physics (p39). Detector technology also continues to offer unpredictable benefits – a powerful example being the potential for detectors developed to search for sterile neutrinos to replace increasingly outmoded traditional approaches to nuclear nonproliferation (p30).
    [Show full text]
  • Lasker Interactive Research Nom'18.Indd
    THE 2018 LASKER MEDICAL RESEARCH AWARDS Nomination Packet albert and mary lasker foundation November 1, 2017 Greetings: On behalf of the Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation, I invite you to submit a nomination for the 2018 Lasker Medical Research Awards. Since 1945, the Lasker Awards have recognized the contributions of scientists, physicians, and public citizens who have made major advances in the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of disease. The Medical Research Awards will be offered in three categories in 2018: Basic Research, Clinical Research, and Special Achievement. The Lasker Foundation seeks nominations of outstanding scientists; nominations of women and minorities are encouraged. Nominations that have been made in previous years are not automatically reconsidered. Please see the Nomination Requirements section of this booklet for instructions on updating and resubmitting a nomination. The Foundation accepts electronic submissions. For information on submitting an electronic nomination, please visit www.laskerfoundation.org. Lasker Awards often presage future recognition of the Nobel committee, and they have become known popularly as “America’s Nobels.” Eighty-seven Lasker laureates have received the Nobel Prize, including 40 in the last three decades. Additional information on the Awards Program and on Lasker laureates can be found on our website, www.laskerfoundation.org. A distinguished panel of jurors will select the scientists to be honored with Lasker Medical Research Awards. The 2018 Awards will
    [Show full text]