Open Jason Cherry Honors Thesis.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open Jason Cherry Honors Thesis.Pdf THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Walled In: The East German Economy Under Walter Ulbricht JASON CHERRY SPRING 2021 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in History and Supply Chain & Information Systems with honors in History Reviewed and approved* by the following: Tobias Brinkmann Professor of Jewish Studies and History Thesis Supervisor Cathleen Cahill Professor of History Honors Adviser * Electronic approvals are on file. i ABSTRACT This thesis explores the economic policies pursued by Walter Ulbricht as leader of the German Democratic Republic between 1949 and his downfall in 1970. The success of these policies was mixed. Ultimately, the GDR economy was constrained because it was built on the Soviet economic model. The war-related destruction of critical infrastructure and industrial assets as well as a lack of resources constituted formidable obstacles. Meanwhile, in West Germany and other Western European countries, U.S. Marshall Plan aid provided crucial support for the rebuilding effort. The Soviets prevented the GDR and its other satellite states from getting access to Marshall Plan support. It would be difficult to overstate the extent of the large-scale, structural challenges which Ulbricht and the GDR faced. This thesis shows that the GDR regime overcame formidable obstacles rebuilding its economy, albeit at a high price for its citizens. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... iv Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 An Overview of the German Democratic Republic’s Economy ................. 6 Politics, Party, and Planning ............................................................................................ 6 Early GDR Industrial Policy ............................................................................................ 10 From Crisis to Crisis: June 1953 to August 1961 ....................................... 19 Worker Uprising of June 1953 ......................................................................................... 19 The New Course ............................................................................................................... 21 Fifteen Years of Agriculture Policy ................................................................................. 28 The 1960s: A Comprehensive Economic Analysis ..................................... 34 New Economic System of 1963 ....................................................................................... 35 The Berlin Wall Opens a New Chapter ............................................................................ 43 Death of the NES and Recentralization............................................................................ 46 Epilogue ....................................................................................................................... 51 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 54 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................ 57 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: German Democratic Republic “Bezirke” (Districts) ................................................ 5 Figure 2: State Bodies Responsible for Planning and Decision-Making in the GDR .............. 8 Figure 3: Growth in Production of Pig Iron and Steel, 1950-53 .............................................. 12 Figure 4: Indices of Industrial Output in the GDR .................................................................. 14 Figure 5: Young Men Throw Stones at Soviet Tanks on Leipziger Platz in Berlin during the Workers' Uprising (June 17, 1953) .................................................................................. 21 Figure 6: Working and Nonworking Persons per 100 Inhabitants ........................................... 25 Figure 7: Percentage of Women in Employed Labor Force .................................................... 26 Figure 8: Number of Emigrants Leaving the GDR, 1949-1965 ............................................... 27 Figure 9: East German Foreign Trade (In million Valuta-Mark)............................................. 43 Figure 10: Construction of the Berlin Wall, August 13, 1961. ................................................ 45 Figure 11: Actual vs. Planned Output, Investment, & Consumption. ...................................... 49 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dr. Brinkmann, for his role as my thesis supervisor. Dr. Brinkmann’s support and expertise was invaluable during the research and writing processes. Dr. Cahill, for her role as my honors advisor. Dr. Cahill’s guidance and encouragement throughout the duration of this project has been incredible. 1 Introduction May 8, 1945, holds in important place in both German and European history as the day Nazi Germany surrendered to the Allied forces, bringing an end to World War II. Six days earlier, when Soviet troops secured Berlin, a German communist returned to the decimated and defeated city from his wartime refuge in the Soviet Union – a homecoming that shaped German history for more than twenty years. That man was Walter Ulbricht; a rising German communist functionary during the 1920s and 1930s. In Soviet exile Ulbricht found the good graces of Stalin and his ruthless political apparatus. Unlike other leading German communists, he survived the many political purges in the Soviet Union. In 1945 Stalin dispatched Ulbricht to Germany as the leader of a small group of party functionaries. They encountered a dire scene; the capital city was nearly levelled. The infrastructure was damaged in many parts of the country. There was no functioning municipal government in Berlin at the time, and it was Ulbricht’s job to organize one. Ulbricht quickly took charge in Berlin and established a viable administration – a testament to his political will and organizational talents. On May 7 and 8, 1945, the Third Reich surrendered to the Allied forces, which effectively put an end to the World War II, leaving in its wake a battered Europe and defeated Germany. Though Allied occupation of Germany had been discussed at the Yalta Conference in February 1945, the administrative details and even the exact borders of the occupation zones had not been determined. After the fall of Berlin, the Allied Control Council representing the United States, Britain, France, and the Soviet Union assumed governmental authority of Germany. The Potsdam Conference, held in July and August of the same year, officially established four zones 2 of occupation and recognized Soviet Military Administration jurisdiction in Germany west of the Oder-Neisse rivers (see figure 1). The city of Berlin was placed under the control of the Allies and divided into four sectors. In addition to occupation, the Potsdam resolutions explicitly permitted the dismantling of German industrial installations as a form of reparation payment to the Allies. Initially, the Allies pursued a common policy with regards to the German question, one focused on denazification and demilitarization – presumably in hopes of the eventual restoration of a sovereign German state.1 In the Soviet zone, domestic politics consolidated around antifascist political parties and were closely monitored by Soviet officials reporting to Stalin. In April 1946, under strong pressure from Moscow, the two major left-wing political parties in eastern Germany, the Social Democratic Party of Germany and the Communist Party of Germany, merged to form the Socialist Unity Party (Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands or SED). When the SED was formed, the Communists quickly gained the upper hand over the Social Democrats and dominated the party. Ulbricht, a trusted and loyal ally of Stalin, was elected as one of two vice- chairmen of the SED. Stalin’s support gave Ulbricht a dominant position in the party and by the fall of 1947 it was clear Ulbricht was the de facto leader of the SED. At the party’s Second Congress in September 1947, Ulbricht delivered an address in which he claimed that the SED was to become a “Party of a new Type.” This phrase worried some Social Democrats in the SED – and for good reason; Ulbricht was referring to the SED becoming a party of the Leninist type. In 1948, the SED’s executive committee officially embraced Leninism and accepted assistance from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. What followed was the transformation of the 1 Mary Fulbrook, A History of Germany 1918 - 2014: The Divided Nation (London: Wiley Blackwell, 2015), 113– 140. 3 party’s structure into one that resembled Soviet-style politics. Once the SED was “Sovietized,” Walter Ulbricht became the General Secretary of the newly formed Politbüro (the party’s leadership council) – a position which resembled that which Stalin held in the Soviet Union.2 The beginning of the Cold War in late 1947 marked the end of attempts by the Soviets and their Western allies to find a common solution for postwar Germany. In March 1948, the United States, Britain, and France agreed to unite the three western zones of occupation and establish a West German state. The Soviet Union responded by leaving the Allied Control Council and announced
Recommended publications
  • Trotsky and the Problem of Soviet Bureaucracy
    TROTSKY AND THE PROBLEM OF SOVIET BUREAUCRACY by Thomas Marshall Twiss B.A., Mount Union College, 1971 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1972 M.S., Drexel University, 1997 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2009 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Thomas Marshall Twiss It was defended on April 16, 2009 and approved by William Chase, Professor, Department of History Ronald H. Linden, Professor, Department of Political Science Ilya Prizel, Professor, Department of Political Science Dissertation Advisor: Jonathan Harris, Professor, Department of Political Science ii Copyright © by Thomas Marshall Twiss 2009 iii TROTSKY AND THE PROBLEM OF SOVIET BUREAUCRACY Thomas Marshall Twiss, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2009 In 1917 the Bolsheviks anticipated, on the basis of the Marxist classics, that the proletarian revolution would put an end to bureaucracy. However, soon after the revolution many within the Bolshevik Party, including Trotsky, were denouncing Soviet bureaucracy as a persistent problem. In fact, for Trotsky the problem of Soviet bureaucracy became the central political and theoretical issue that preoccupied him for the remainder of his life. This study examines the development of Leon Trotsky’s views on that subject from the first years after the Russian Revolution through the completion of his work The Revolution Betrayed in 1936. In his various writings over these years Trotsky expressed three main understandings of the nature of the problem: During the civil war and the first years of NEP he denounced inefficiency in the distribution of supplies to the Red Army and resources throughout the economy as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Breakthrough to Freedom
    The International Foundation for SocioEconomic and Political Studies (The Gorbachev Foundation) BREAKTHROUGH TO FREEDOM PERESTROIKA: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS R.VALENT PUBLISHERS 2009 Compiled by Viktor Kuvaldin, Professor, Doctor of History Executive Editor: Aleksandr Veber, CONTENTS Doctor of History Translation: Tatiana Belyak, Konstantin Petrenko To the Reader . .5 Page makeup: Viktoriya Kolesnichenko Art design: R.Valent Publishers PART I. Seven Years that Changed the Country and the World Publisher’s Acknowledgement: Special thanks to Mr. Mikhail Selivanov, Vadim Medvedev. Perestroika’s Chance of Success . .8 who helped make this book possible. Stephen F. Cohen. Was the Soviet System Reformable? . .22 ISBN 9785934392629 Archie Brown. Perestroika and the Five Transformations . .40 Aleksandr Galkin. The Place of Perestroika in the History of Russia . .58 Viktor Kuvaldin. Three Forks in the Road of Gorbachev’s Perestroika . .73 Breakthrough to Freedom. Perestroika: A Critical Analysis. Aleksandr Veber. Perestroika and International Social Democracy . .95 M., R.Valent Publishers, 2009, — 304 pages. Boris Slavin. Perestroika in the Mirror of Modern Interpretations . .111 Jack F. Matlock, Jr. Perestroika as Viewed from Washington, 19851991 . .126 Copyright © 2009 by the International PART II. Our Times and Ourselves Foundation for SocioEconomic and Political Studies (The Gorbachev Foundation) Aleksandr Nekipelov. Is It Easy to Catch a Black Cat in a Dark Room, Copyright © R.Valent Publishers Even If It Is There? . .144 All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means Oleg Bogomolov. A Turning Point in History: without written permission of the copyright Reflections of an EyeWitness . .152 holders. Nikolay Shmelev. Bloodshed Is Not Inevitable .
    [Show full text]
  • Communism: Its Ideology, Its History, and Its Legacy COMMUNISM: ITS IDEOLOGY, ITS HISTORY
    COMMUNISM: ITS IDEOLOGY, ITS HISTORY, and ITS LEGACY Third Edition Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation© 1 2 Communism: Its Ideology, Its History, and Its Legacy COMMUNISM: ITS IDEOLOGY, ITS HISTORY, and ITS LEGACY Paul Kengor, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science Grove City College Lee Edwards, Ph.D. Chairman Emeritus Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation Claire McCaffery Griffin, MA Claire Griffin Consulting, LLC PUBLISHED BY Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation 300 New Jersey Avenue NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20001 www.victimsofcommunism.org Third Edition Copyright ©2021 Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation 300 New Jersey Avenue NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 [email protected] Printed in the United States 4 Communism: Its Ideology, Its History, and Its Legacy Table of Contents Introduction .........................................................................7 Karl Marx and His Legacy .............................................................9 Lenin and the Bolshevik Revolution .................................................. 27 Stalin and the Soviet Union ......................................................... 39 Independence, Occupation, and Deportation in the Baltics ..............................51 Mao and China .....................................................................81 Kim Il-Sung and North Korea ........................................................ 93 Pol Pot and Cambodia .............................................................103
    [Show full text]
  • The New Course in Hungary in 1953 Director Director
    WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Christian Ostermann, Lee H. Hamilton, The New Course in Hungary in 1953 Director Director BOARD OF ADVISORY TRUSTEES: COMMITTEE: János Rainer Joseph A. Cari, Jr., William Taubman Chairman Working Paper No. 38 (Amherst College) Steven Alan Bennett, Chairman Vice Chairman PUBLIC MEMBERS Michael Beschloss (Historian, Author) The Secretary of State Colin Powell; The Librarian of James H. Billington Congress (Librarian of Congress) James H. Billington; The Archivist of the United States Warren I. Cohen John W. Carlin; (University of Maryland- The Chairman of the Baltimore) National Endowment for the Humanities Bruce Cole; John Lewis Gaddis The Secretary of the (Yale University) Smithsonian Institution Lawrence M. Small; The Secretary of James Hershberg Education (The George Washington Roderick R. Paige; University) The Secretary of Health & Human Services Tommy G. Thompson; Samuel F. Wells, Jr. (Woodrow Wilson Washington, D.C. PRIVATE MEMBERS Center) Carol Cartwright, June 2002 John H. Foster, Sharon Wolchik Jean L. Hennessey, (The George Washington Daniel L. Lamaute, University) Doris O. Mausui, Thomas R. Reedy, Nancy M. Zirkin COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • Communist Upbringing Under Stalin: the Political Socialization And
    COMMUNIST UPBRINGING UNDER STALIN: THE POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION AND MILITARIZATION OF SOVIET YOUTH, 1934-1941 By Seth Bernstein A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Seth Bernstein, 2013 Communist Upbringing under Stalin: The Political Socialization and Militarization of Soviet Youth, 1934-1941 Seth Bernstein Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2013 Abstract: In 1935 the Communist Youth League (Komsomol) embraced a policy called “communist upbringing” that changed the purpose of Soviet official youth culture. Founded in 1918, the Komsomol had been an organization of cultural proletarianization and economic mobilization. After the turmoil of Stalin’s revolution from above, Soviet leaders declared that the country had entered the period of socialism. Under the new conditions of socialism, including the threat of war with the capitalist world, “communist upbringing” transformed the youth league into an organization of mass socialization meant to mold youth in the shape of the regime. The key goals of “communist upbringing” were to broaden the influence of Soviet political culture and to enforce a code of “cultured” behavior among youth. Youth leaders transformed the Komsomol from a league of young male workers into an organization that included more than a quarter of Soviet youth by 1941, incorporating more adolescents, women, and non-workers. Employing recreation, reward and disciplinary practices that blurred into repression, mass socialization in the Komsomol attempted to create a cohort of “Soviet” youth— sober, orderly, physically strong and politically loyal to Stalin’s regime. The transformation of youth culture under Stalin reflected a general shift in Stalinist social policies in the mid-1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hero-‐Mirror Mechanism
    CULTURAL DISCOURSES IN CEAUŞIST ROMANIA: THE HERO-MIRROR MECHANISM FILIP SEBASTIAN BOICU, BA. MA. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2014 1 2 ABSTRACT Cultural discourses in Ceauşist Romania: The Hero-Mirror Mechanism This thesis is concerned with main cultural discourses of the second phase of Communism in Romania (1964-1989), period largely identical with that of Ceauşescu’s rule. A secondary aim of the thesis is to look at the post-1989 continuations of these publicly influential discourses with the aim of understanding how the educational system (HE, in particular) is positioned in relation to the cultural domain. With regard to the Communist period, the main assertion of the thesis is that analysis of these discourses reveals an underlying cultural mechanism equivalent with a central mode of governance employed by the Communist party. According to this assertion, the mission of this cultural mechanism, with origins in Lenin’s drastic distinction between the party and the proletariat and in the idea that the party must bestow consciousness on the proletariat, is to create and regulate positive avatars (heroes imbued with the best of humanity) for each social category so as to fulfill and safeguard the aims of the Party. For this reason, this device has been entitled the hero-mirror mechanism. The device has also been linked with religion and theology. This perspective has found that the mirror-mechanism corresponds to the notion of “imago Dei,” and its axes to the notions of “kenosis” and “imitatio Dei.” The assessment of these cultural discourses via the mirror-mechanism results in three dimensions of research, each with its own universes of investigation, and each with its own findings.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improperalignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for aity photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY IN HUNGARY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Choong-Mook Lee, B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Gheorghiu-Dej and the Romanian Workers' Party
    WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Lee H. Hamilton, Gheorghiu-Dej and the Romanian Christian Ostermann, Director Director Workers’ Party: From De-Sovietization to BOARD OF the Emergence of National Communism TRUSTEES: ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Joseph A. Cari, Jr., Chairman Vladimir Tismăneanu William Taubman Steven Alan Bennett, (Amherst College) Vice Chairman Chairman Working Paper No. 37 PUBLIC MEMBERS Michael Beschloss The Secretary of State (Historian, Author) Colin Powell; The Librarian of Congress James H. Billington James H. Billington; (Librarian of Congress) The Archivist of the United States John W. Carlin; Warren I. Cohen The Chairman of the (University of Maryland- National Endowment Baltimore) for the Humanities Bruce Cole; The Secretary of the John Lewis Gaddis Smithsonian Institution (Yale University) Lawrence M. Small; The Secretary of Education James Hershberg Roderick R. Paige; (The George Washington The Secretary of Health University) & Human Services Tommy G. Thompson; Washington, D.C. Samuel F. Wells, Jr. PRIVATE MEMBERS (Woodrow Wilson Center) Carol Cartwright, May 2002 John H. Foster, Jean L. Hennessey, Sharon Wolchik Daniel L. Lamaute, (The George Washington Doris O. Mausui, University) Thomas R. Reedy, Nancy M. Zirkin COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Socialist Popular Culture and Youth Culture During the Long 1960S in Hungary a Dissertation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Socialist Popular Culture and Youth Culture during the Long 1960s in Hungary A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy In History by Beth Marie Greene 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Socialist Popular Culture and Youth Culture during the Long 1960s in Hungary by Beth Marie Greene Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Ivan T. Berend, Chair In this dissertation, the author examines the spread of popular culture in Hungary during the long 1960s, with particular emphasis on how the Hungarian government’s policy on popular culture affected Hungarian youth culture. Drawing on literature and theory from consumption, popular culture, and youth culture, the author uses a variety of primary source documents to demonstrate that throughout the 1960s, the Hungarian state socialist government promoted cultural consumption in a way that spoke to popular demand while couching this consumption within the rhetoric of modern socialism. Cultural products were depoliticized and increasingly subsumed into the market reforms that were being implemented during this period, meaning that culture, too, had to answer in some way to consumer demand. As consumption and mass media became associated with modernity, the government argued that products of popular culture were in keeping with their efforts to build socialism not because of their content, but because these products were consumed in a socialist manner. The introduction of Hungarian socialist popular ii culture also served as a way to provide an alternative to Western variants, which were becoming increasingly available in the era of peaceful coexistence.
    [Show full text]
  • Which East Is Red? the Maoist Presence in the Soviet Union and Soviet Bloc Europe 1956-1980
    Which East is Red? The Maoist Presence in the Soviet Union and Soviet Bloc Europe 1956-1980 Andrew Smith Foreign Languages Press Foreign Languages Press Collection “New Roads” #3 A collection directed by Christophe Kistler Contact – [email protected] https://foreignlanguages.press Paris, 2019 1st Edition ISBN: 978-2-491182-00-7 This book is under license Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ To My Family Acknowledgements I would like to thank many people, foundations, and organizations for their help in my work. I am particularly indebted to journalist and activist Alexei Volnyets of the International Democracy Fund in Moscow, Dimitri Rublev of Mos- cow State Pedagogical University, Evgeniy Kasakov of the University of Bremen, and opposition activist Dimitri Kostenko for their aid in direct- ing me to Soviet sources. I would also like to thank the Marxist Internet Archive, the From Marx to Mao Internet Library, the Russian Maoist Party, the 23 September Resistance Movement of Bulgaria, and the Russian Left Front for their invaluable help with sources that I would otherwise not been able to access. I am also, naturally, greatly indebted to Douglas Reynolds, Ian Fletcher, and Jared Poley of Georgia State University, my Russian language instruc- tors across the years, and my comrades in communist parties around the world for their wisdom and encouragement. This endeavor would have been impossible without them. Contents Introduction 7 Chapter 1 An Uneasy Alliance
    [Show full text]
  • Perestroika's Revival Of
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy The NEP Era: Soviet Russia 1921-1928, 3 (2009), 1-35. ARTICLES LARS T. LIH (Montréal, Québec, Canada) PERESTROIKA’S REVIVAL OF NEP: A CONTEMPORARY CHRONICLE, 1985-1990 A NOTE OF EXPLANATION In 1987, a group of former students of Robert Tucker held a confer- ence in Princeton, New Jersey, devoted to various aspects of the pere- stroika reforms. This conference, organized by Stephen Cohen and Mi- chael Kraus, seemed an appropriate way to honor one of the few scholars in the Soviet field who, far from being flummoxed by perestroika, had long brought to our attention both the need and potential for reform in the Soviet Union. My report at this conference was on the topic of the reformers’ use of NEP as a legitimating symbol. The NEP theme proved to be an extremely rich guide to the debates swirling in the Soviet media that were such a hallmark of the Gorbachev years. Public opinion mutated at high speed during perestroika, and so, with a view to publication, my report was sub- stantially updated at least twice (whence the use of “chronicle” in the ti- tle). The final revision was made in the summer of 1990. At that point, events overtook us. As the Soviet Union crumbled and fell, the publica- tion of a volume devoted to the problems of perestroika was no longer vi- able. Enough time has now passed, however, to allow an out-of-date study of current events to turn into a useful study of a fascinating historical epi- sode.
    [Show full text]
  • Perestroika's Revival of Nep: a Contemporary Chronicle
    The NEP Era: Soviet Russia 1921-1928, 3 (2009), 1-35. ARTICLES LARS T. LIH (Montréal, Québec, Canada) PERESTROIKA’S REVIVAL OF NEP: A CONTEMPORARY CHRONICLE, 1985-1990 A NOTE OF EXPLANATION In 1987, a group of former students of Robert Tucker held a confer- ence in Princeton, New Jersey, devoted to various aspects of the pere- stroika reforms. This conference, organized by Stephen Cohen and Mi- chael Kraus, seemed an appropriate way to honor one of the few scholars in the Soviet field who, far from being flummoxed by perestroika, had long brought to our attention both the need and potential for reform in the Soviet Union. My report at this conference was on the topic of the reformers’ use of NEP as a legitimating symbol. The NEP theme proved to be an extremely rich guide to the debates swirling in the Soviet media that were such a hallmark of the Gorbachev years. Public opinion mutated at high speed during perestroika, and so, with a view to publication, my report was sub- stantially updated at least twice (whence the use of “chronicle” in the ti- tle). The final revision was made in the summer of 1990. At that point, events overtook us. As the Soviet Union crumbled and fell, the publica- tion of a volume devoted to the problems of perestroika was no longer vi- able. Enough time has now passed, however, to allow an out-of-date study of current events to turn into a useful study of a fascinating historical epi- sode. Part of the historical value of my essay comes precisely from its time-bound perspective, so I have left it substantially unchanged from its 1990 rewrite.
    [Show full text]