DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF, 177.9 Kb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ka-32 service and maintenance centre opens in the Republic of Korea 28 January 2013, Moscow The Korea Forest Service has formally opened a new service and maintenance centre for Ka-32 helicopters manufactured by Russian Helicopters, a subsidiary of Oboronprom, part of State Corporation Rostec. Representatives of Russian Helicopters took part in the opening ceremony for the centre, which will promote the use of Ka-32 helicopters in the Republic of Korea and other countries in the Asia- Pacific region and reduce waiting times for maintenance and repair of these helicopters. “The opening of the new service centre will first of all have a positive effect on prospects for promoting Russian-built Kamov-brand helicopters in East Asia,” said Russian Helicopters CEO Alexander Mikheev. “This is a key region for our industry, and we want to be able to offer helicopter operators high-quality maintenance services through the whole life-cycle of our helicopters.” The multi-role Ka-32 has been supplied to South Korea since 1993. The Korea Forest Service uses the helicopter for monitoring forests and for fire-fighting, the country’s Air Force flies it for search-and-rescue missions, while the Coast Guard deploys helicopters in patrolling its coastal waters. The Ka-32 is also used in the commercial sector for carrying cargo, construction work and other missions. In total 61 Ka-32 helicopters are operational in South Korea, and have racked up more than 100,000 flight hours between them. The Ka-32 service and maintenance centre is located in a new multi-purpose complex that also houses the headquarters of the Korea Forest Service. The centre can service all types of Ka-32 helicopters in use in the region. Previously these functions were outsourced to Korean company LGI, one of Russian Helicopters’ key partners in the region. The LGI service centre will continue to operate. The Korea Forest Service is currently considering expanding its fleet of Ka-32 helicopters by purchasing the latest model in the series, the Ka-32A11BC – a unique coaxial helicopter that currently operates in more than 30 countries around the world including in EU states, Republic of Korea, China, Japan, Canada and Russia. The Ka-32A11BC can be deployed for special search- and-rescue and high-rise construction operations, as well as highly complex fire-fighting missions, cargo transportation inside the cabin or on an external sling, in logging operations, to evacuate sick and wounded people, and for routine patrolling and monitoring. For more information about Russian Helicopters, please visit www.russianhelicopters.aero Russian Helicopters, JSC is a subsidiary of UIC Oboronprom, which in turn is a part of State Corporation Rostec. It is one of the global leaders in helicopter production and the only helicopter design and production powerhouse in Russia. Russian Helicopters is headquartered in Moscow. The company comprises five helicopter production facilities, two design bureaus, a spare parts production and repair facility, as well as an aftersale service branch responsible for maintenance and repair in Russia and all over the world. Its helicopters are popular among Russian ministries and state authorities (Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Emergency Control Ministry), operators (Gazpromavia, UTair), major Russian corporations. Over 8000 helicopters of Soviet/Russian make are operated in 110 countries worldwide. Traditionally the demand is highest in the Middle East, Africa, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Russia, and CIS countries. Russian Helicopters was established in 2007. In 2012 its IFRS revenues increased 21% to RUB 125,7billion. Deliveries reached 290 helicopters. UIC Oboronprom, JSC is a multi-profile industrial and investment group established in 2002. It is a part of Russian Technologies State Corporation. Its main tasks include: helicopter engineering (Russian Helicopters, JSC) and engine-building (United Engine Industry Corporation managing company). Rostekhnologii State Corporation (Rostec) is a Russian corporation established in 2007 in order to facilitate the development, manufacturing and export of high-technology industrial products of military and civil purposes. Today it comprises over 663 companies, which form 8 military- industrial and 5 civil industry holdings. Rostec’s subsidiaries are located in 60 regions of Russia and supply their products to over 70 countries worldwide. In 2012 revenues of the Corporation amounted to RUB 931 billion, net profits were RUB 38.5 billion and total taxation exceeded RUB 109 billion. Roman Kirillov www.russianhelicopters.aero T: +7 495 627 5545, extn. 7240 twitter.com/RusHeliCo M: +7 917 564 3346 facebook.com/RussianHelicopters F: +7 495 627 5424 youtube.com/user/RussianHelicopters Skype: russianhelicopters vk.com/russianhelicopters [email protected] For more information about Russian Helicopters, please visit www.russianhelicopters.aero For more information about Russian Helicopters, please visit www.russianhelicopters.aero .
Recommended publications
  • Russian Helicopters Experience and Innovation

    Russian Helicopters Experience and Innovation

    RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS EXPERIENCE AND INNOVATION © 2013 Russian Helicopters, JSC All rights reserved RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS AT A GLANCE Russian Helicopters, JSC is the sole manufacturer of “Mil” and “Kamov” civil and military helicopters. The company’s structure incorporates design bureaus, final assembly plants, components and parts manufacturers and service providers. Russian Helicopters consolidated the entire helicopter-building industry of Russia. We offer complete helicopter lifecycle from development to disposal. Russian Helicopters was founded in 2007 as a subsidiary of Oboronprom Corporation © 2013 Russian Helicopters, JSC All rights reserved FULLY INTEGRATED STRUCTURE Oboronprom TOTAL STAFF – 41,000 EMPLOYEES Russian Helicopters (98.5%) Mil Moscow Kazan Helicopters SMPP Helicopter Service Helicopter Plant (80.22%) (59.99%) Company (72.38%) (100.0%) Kamov Rostvertol Reduktor-PM (99.79%) (92.01%) (80.84%) Moscow and region NARP (9,000 employees) Kazan (95.1%) (6,500 employees) Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant (84.82%) Perm Progress Arsenyev (1,800 employees) Aviation Company Rostov-on-Don (93.14%) (7,900 employees) Kumertau Kumertau (4,000 employees) Novosibirsk Aviation PE (500 employees) (100.0%) Arsenyev (6,000 employees) Ulan-Ude (6,000 employees) © 2013 Russian Helicopters, JSC All rights reserved RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS AROUND THE WORLD Civil Total 37,530 Military Total 22,800 9% 91% 78% Civil Military Russian-made helicopters Key regions: account for nearly 14% of the Russia, CIS, India, China, Latin global fleet and are operated America,
  • Rotorcraft (2011)

    Rotorcraft (2011)

    Rotorcraft Overview The rotorcraft industry produces aircraft, powered by either turboshaft or reciprocating engines, capable of performing vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) operations. The rotorcraft sector includes helicopters, gyrocopters, and tiltrotor aircraft. Helicopters, which employ a horizontal rotor for both lift and propulsion, are the mainstay of the industry. Gyrocopters are produced in much smaller quantities, primarily for use in recreational flying. Tiltrotor aircraft, such as the V-22 Osprey1, can take off vertically and then fly horizontally as a fixed-wing aircraft. Rotorcraft are manufactured in most industrialized countries, based on indigenous design or in collaboration with, or under license from, other manufacturers. Manufacturers in the United States of civilian helicopters include American Eurocopter, Bell, Enstrom, Kaman, MD Helicopters, Robinson, Schweizer (now a subsidiary of Sikorsky), and Sikorsky. Bell moved its civilian helicopter production to Canada, with the last U.S. product completed in 1993.2 American Eurocopter—a subsidiary of the European manufacturer and subsidiary of EADS NV—has manufacturing and assembly facilities in Grand Prairie, Texas and Columbus, Missouri. European producers include AgustaWestland, Eurocopter, NHIndustries, and PZL Swidnik. Russian manufacturers including Mil Moscow, Kamov and Kazan helicopters, as well as a number of other rotorcraft related companies, have been consolidated under the Russian government majority-owned OAO OPK Oboronprom.3 (See this report’s Russia
  • Over Thirty Years After the Wright Brothers

    Over Thirty Years After the Wright Brothers

    ver thirty years after the Wright Brothers absolutely right in terms of a so-called “pure” helicop- attained powered, heavier-than-air, fixed-wing ter. However, the quest for speed in rotary-wing flight Oflight in the United States, Germany astounded drove designers to consider another option: the com- the world in 1936 with demonstrations of the vertical pound helicopter. flight capabilities of the side-by-side rotor Focke Fw 61, The definition of a “compound helicopter” is open to which eclipsed all previous attempts at controlled verti- debate (see sidebar). Although many contend that aug- cal flight. However, even its overall performance was mented forward propulsion is all that is necessary to modest, particularly with regards to forward speed. Even place a helicopter in the “compound” category, others after Igor Sikorsky perfected the now-classic configura- insist that it need only possess some form of augment- tion of a large single main rotor and a smaller anti- ed lift, or that it must have both. Focusing on what torque tail rotor a few years later, speed was still limited could be called “propulsive compounds,” the following in comparison to that of the helicopter’s fixed-wing pages provide a broad overview of the different helicop- brethren. Although Sikorsky’s basic design withstood ters that have been flown over the years with some sort the test of time and became the dominant helicopter of auxiliary propulsion unit: one or more propellers or configuration worldwide (approximately 95% today), jet engines. This survey also gives a brief look at the all helicopters currently in service suffer from one pri- ways in which different manufacturers have chosen to mary limitation: the inability to achieve forward speeds approach the problem of increased forward speed while much greater than 200 kt (230 mph).
  • The Market for Medium/Heavy Commercial Rotorcraft

    The Market for Medium/Heavy Commercial Rotorcraft

    The Market for Medium/Heavy Commercial Rotorcraft Product Code #F605 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Rotorcraft Forecast Analysis 4 The Market for Medium/Heavy Commercial Rotorcraft 2011-2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................2 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Competitive Environment.......................................................................................................................................7 Market Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................9 Table 1 - Medium/Heavy Commercial Rotorcraft Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2011 - 2020......................................................10 Table 2 - Medium/Heavy Commercial Rotorcraft Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2011 - 2020 ......................................................12 Figure 1 - Medium/Heavy Commercial Rotorcraft Unit Production 2011-2020 (Bar Graph).....................................................................................14
  • A Numerical Workshop for Rotorcraft Concepts Generation and Evaluation Pierre-Marie Basset, Philippe Beaumier, Thomas Rakotomamonjy

    A Numerical Workshop for Rotorcraft Concepts Generation and Evaluation Pierre-Marie Basset, Philippe Beaumier, Thomas Rakotomamonjy

    CREATION: a numerical workshop for rotorcraft concepts generation and evaluation Pierre-Marie Basset, Philippe Beaumier, Thomas Rakotomamonjy To cite this version: Pierre-Marie Basset, Philippe Beaumier, Thomas Rakotomamonjy. CREATION: a numerical work- shop for rotorcraft concepts generation and evaluation. Rotorcraft Virtual Engineering Conference, Nov 2016, LIVERPOOL, United Kingdom. hal-01384197 HAL Id: hal-01384197 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01384197 Submitted on 19 Oct 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Rotorcraft Virtual Engineering, Liverpool, 8-10 Nov. 2016 CREATION: a numerical workshop for rotorcraft concepts generation and evaluation Pierre-Marie Basset, Philippe Beaumier, Thomas Rakotomamonjy ONERA – The French Aerospace Lab, FRANCE [email protected] Abstract. C.R.E.A.T.I.O.N. for “Concepts of Rotorcraft Enhanced Assessment Through Integrated Optimization Network”, is a multidisciplinary computational workshop for the evaluation of rotorcraft concepts. The evaluation concerns both flight performance and environmental impacts (acoustics, air pollution/fuel consumption, etc.). The CREATION workshop must allow the evaluation of any rotorcraft concept whatever the level of details of the description data initially available. Therefore the tool must cope with the preliminary conception problems.
  • Russian Helicopters Today 16

    Russian Helicopters Today 16

    DREAMS OF FLYING 1 Соntents: RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS AT A GLANCE 2 KEY 2015 HIGHLIGHTS 3 CHAIRman’s STATEMENT 10 DIRECTOR GENERal’s STATEMENT 12 RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS TODAY 16 MARKET OVERVIEW 26 Civil Helicopter 28 Military Helicopters 29 Company’s Market Positions 30 2015 – year of efficiency growth and strengthening the results obtained 34 Deliverie 34 Service and After-sales Support 36 Order Book 37 CAPEX 38 Organizational Development 39 2015 Financial Performance 39 strategy 44 Key objectives for 2016 45 social responsibility 46 corporate governance 47 Board of Directors 47 Management 57 Internal audit 62 Capital Markets and Investor Relations 63 risK ManageMent 64 ifrs financial stateMents for the year ended 31 deceMber 2015 70 2 DREAMS OF FLYING / ANNUAL REPORT 2015 KEY HIGHLIGHTS 3 RUSSIAN 20.15 HELICOPTERS EBITDA FIRM ORDER PROFIT AT A GLANCE 212 INCREASED BY BOOK TOTALED HELICOPTERS 39.5% TOTALED RUB 494 JSC “RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS” IS A LEADING PLAYER IN THE GLOBAL WERE SUPPLIED TO RUB 65.6 42.1 HELICOPTERS BILLION HELICOPTER INDUSTRY, THE SOLE RUSSIAN DESIGNER IN 2015 BILLION AS AT AND MANUFACTURER OF HELICOPTERS. 31.12. 2015 Headquartered in Moscow, “Russian Latin America, Russia, and the CIS Helicopters” Holding Company include countries. five helicopter plants, two design Although «Russian Helicopters» NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST IN THE SUBSIDIARIES IS bureaus, component production and was established only in 2007, some maintenance enterprise, a helicopter of the Company’s key entities have REVENUE service company, which ensures after- existed for more than 60 years. The EBITDA1 MARGIN GREW BY sales services in Russia and abroad new shape of the Holding Company AMOUNTED TO 29.5% and five aircraft repair enterprises.
  • Russia's Military R&D Infrastructure

    Russia's Military R&D Infrastructure

    Russia’s Military R&D Infrastructure A Primer Johan Engvall FOI-R--5124--SE April 2021 Johan Engvall Russia’s Military R&D Infrastructure A Primer FOI-R--5124--SE Title Russia’s Military R&D Infrastructure – A Primer Titel Rysslands militära FoU-infrastruktur – en primer Report no FOI-R--5124--SE Month April Year 2021 Pages 53 ISSN 1650-1942 Customer Ministry of Defence Forskningsområde Säkerhetspolitik FoT-område Inget FoT-område Project no A12111 Approved by Malek Finn Khan Ansvarig avdelning Försvarsanalys Cover: Students of the military innovative technopolis Era. 22 November 2018. Kommersant/TT Nyhetsbyrån. This work is protected by the Swedish Act on Copyright in Literary and Artistic Works (1960:729). Citation is permitted in accordance with article 22 in said act. Any form of use that goes beyond what is permitted by Swedish copyright law, requires the written permission of FOI. 2 (53) FOI-R--5124--SE Sammanfattning Rysslands militära FoU-infrastruktur består av tre typer av organisationer med rötter i Sovjettiden – forskningsinstitut, konstruktionsbyråer och vetenskapliga produktionsassociationer. Forskningsinstituten sysslar i huvudsak med att utveckla forskningsidéer för militär tillämpning. Konstruktionsbyråerna utvecklar och testar prototyper. Vetenskapliga produktionsassociationer kombinerar FoU- verksamhet med egen tillverkningskapacitet. Sammantaget består försvars- industrins FoU-komponent av nästan 600 organisationer. Av dessa är cirka 300 forskningsinstitut, knappt 130 konstruktionsbyråer och ungefär 170 vetenskapliga produktionsassociationer. Geografiskt är FoU-organisationerna koncentrerade till större städer. I och omkring Moskva finns nästan hälften av alla FoU-institut, medan St. Petersburg har en femtedel av instituten. Den militära FoU-strukturen kan indelas i sju huvud- sakliga branscher: flyg, rymdteknologi, skeppsbyggnad, konventionella vapen, radioelektronik och kommunikationssystem, ammunition och speciella kemikalier samt kärnteknik.
  • Study of Contra-Rotating Coaxial Rotors in Hover, a Performance Model Based on Blade Element Theory Including Swirl Velocity

    Study of Contra-Rotating Coaxial Rotors in Hover, a Performance Model Based on Blade Element Theory Including Swirl Velocity

    Theses - Daytona Beach Dissertations and Theses Fall 2007 Study of Contra-rotating Coaxial Rotors in Hover, A Performance Model Based on Blade Element Theory Including Swirl Velocity Florent Lucas Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/db-theses Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Lucas, Florent, "Study of Contra-rotating Coaxial Rotors in Hover, A Performance Model Based on Blade Element Theory Including Swirl Velocity" (2007). Theses - Daytona Beach. 127. https://commons.erau.edu/db-theses/127 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University – Daytona Beach at ERAU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in the Theses - Daytona Beach collection by an authorized administrator of ERAU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDY OF COUNTER-ROTATING COAXIAL ROTORS IN HOVER A PERFORMANCE MODEL BASED ON BLADE ELEMENT THEORY INCLUDING SWIRL VELOCITY by Florent Lucas A thesis submitted to the Aerospace Engineering Department In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida Fall 2007 UMI Number: EP32005 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
  • Airshow News INTOSH DAVID M C DAVID

    Airshow News INTOSH DAVID M C DAVID

    DAY 3 June 19, 2019 PARIS PUBLICATIONS Airshow News INTOSH c DAVID M DAVID Sustainability Mega Max order boosts Boeing CTOs unify on joint statement › page 6 by Gregory Polek The 737 Max program received a huge vote primarily out of London Gatwick Airport. “Like everybody, I’ve been paying close Supersonic Flight of confidence from one of the world’s most Walsh added that the group would con- attention to what’s been happening with influential airlines at the Paris Air Show on sider using the Max as a means to diversify the aircraft since the tragic events with Old rules for old SSTs Tuesday, when International Airlines Group the future fleet to spur competition. IAG both Lion Air and Ethiopian,” he noted in demand data-driven (IAG) inked a letter of intent covering 200 has long operated Airbus A320s as its exclu- response to a question about his confidence Max 8s and Max 10s worth more than $24 sive narrowbody type. in the airplane. “We have every confidence revisions › page 29 billion at list prices. “I know the aircraft very well and I know in Boeing and expect that the aircraft will Appearing at the show with Boeing Com- the company very well,” he said. “I’ve made make a successful return to service in the F-35 Lightning II pany CEO Dennis Muilenburg and Boeing no secret of my desire to see the Boeing coming months.” CEO Kevin McAllister, IAG CEO Willie narrowbody aircraft in our fleet.” Walsh Boeing has promised to deliver the first air- Costs come down as Walsh said the group would place the new characterized the negotiations as “tough,” plane in 2023, but Walsh commented he would roles and missions Max jets mainly with subsidiaries British but thought the sides had reached a fair hope it could arrive in 2022.
  • A Survey of Theoretical and Experimental Coaxial Rotor Aerodynamic Research 1997

    A Survey of Theoretical and Experimental Coaxial Rotor Aerodynamic Research 1997

    NASA Technical Paper 3675 A Survey of Theoretical and Experimental Coaxial Rotor Aerodynamic Research 1997 Colin P. Coleman, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California 94035-1000 Contents Page List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................................... V Nomenclature ............................................................................................................................................................ vii Summary .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Research in the United States of America ................................................................................................................ 2 NACA Langley Research Center ...................................................................................................................... 2 De Lackner Helicopters, Inc .............................................................................................................................
  • Military Helicopters

    Military Helicopters

    297 Rotorcraft engineering is an area that sometimes doesn't get an awful lot of respect. I can substantiate that by quoting Wilbur Wright. The punch line is: "... The helicopter is much easier to design than the airplane but is worthless when done." The quote is from the Dayton Herald (Ohio) and was given to my friend Ralph Alex, then the Sikorsky XR4 project engineer, on the occasion of the delivery of the Army's second helicopter to Wright Field in May 1942. (The first was the De Bothezat machine, delivered in 1922.) Several times over several days, Ralph Alex and Igor Sikorsky offered Orville Wright a ride in the Sikorsky helicopter. Wright had politely refused each offer. Finally, Orville explained that he could not accept because he did not believe the machine was practical and, by way of justification, offered a copy of an article containing the previous quote by his brother Wilbur. It should be noted that the XR-4 helicopter, rolled from the factory on December 7, 1941, was the prototype for 129 helicopters delivered to the U. S. Army by September 7, 1944. An additional 488 helicopters (R-5s and R-6s) were built before the end of WW II. (References are given for additional reading on the subject area. Ralph P. Alex, "How Are You Fixed for Blades? The Saga of the Helicopter, Circa 1940-60/' published in The Age of the Helicopter, Vertical Flight, National Air and Space Museum, 1984.) Davton,Ohio Januarv15, 1909 Likeall novices,we beganwiththe helicopter (in childhood)butsoonsawthat it hadnofuture anddroppedit.
  • A Comparative Analysis of Technological Learning Systems in Emerging Rotorcraft Companies by MASSACHUSFS INSTITTE Thiam Soon Gan O EINLG

    A Comparative Analysis of Technological Learning Systems in Emerging Rotorcraft Companies by MASSACHUSFS INSTITTE Thiam Soon Gan O EINLG

    A Comparative Analysis of Technological Learning Systems in Emerging Rotorcraft Companies By MASSACHUSFS INSTITTE Thiam Soon Gan O EINLG B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering National University of Singapore, 2003 L LIBRARIES Submitted to the System Design and Management Program In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of ARCHNES Master of Science in Engineering and Management at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2011 ( 2011 Thiam Soon Gan All rights reserved The author hereby grants MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of author Thiam Soon Gan System Design and Management Program November 2010 Certified by Dr. George L. Roth Principle Research Associate / Thesis Supervisor Lean Advancement Initiative / oan School of Management Center for Technology, Po ~ ndustia l t Accepted by \ly Pat Hale Director System Design and Management Program Engineering Systems Division This page is intentionally left blank A Comparative Analysis of Technological Learning Systems in Emerging Rotorcraft Companies By Thiam Soon Gan Submitted to the System Design and Management Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to understand how emerging rotorcraft companies in various countries accomplished technological learning over the last sixty years. Owing to its unique products and growing market demand, rotorcraft industry is one of the most globalized and dynamic sectors of the aerospace industry. Understanding technological learning in the rotorcraft industry is important to industrial policy makers and corporate managers who are seeking more clarity in the relationship between rotorcraft companies and the global social-political environment.