Practical Approach and Review of Brachial Plexus Pathology with Operative Correlation: What the Radiologist Needs to Know Sarah E
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
15-1117 ) Issued: July 6, 2016 U.S
United States Department of Labor Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board __________________________________________ ) T.T., Appellant ) ) and ) Docket No. 15-1117 ) Issued: July 6, 2016 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, ) Philadelphia, PA, Employer ) __________________________________________ ) Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record Michael D. Overman, Esq., for the appellant Office of Solicitor, for the Director DECISION AND ORDER Before: CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Chief Judge PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge JURISDICTION On April 21, 2015 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal of a December 9, 2014 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c)(1) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction to consider the merits of the case. ISSUE The issue is whether appellant has met her burden of proof to establish either cervical radiculopathy or a brachial plexus injury, causally related to factors of her federal employment. On appeal counsel alleges that the impartial medical specialist failed to provide sufficient medical reasoning to resolve the existing conflict of medical opinion evidence. 1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq. FACTUAL HISTORY This case has previously been on appeal before the Board.2 The facts and the circumstances outlined in the Board’s prior decision are incorporated herein by reference. The facts relevant to this appeal are set forth below. On March 20, 2008 appellant, then a 44-year-old distribution clerk, filed a timely occupational disease claim (Form CA-2), alleging that she developed neck and shoulder conditions due to repetitive work tasks, commencing June 1, 2006. -
Brachial-Plexopathy.Pdf
Brachial Plexopathy, an overview Learning Objectives: The brachial plexus is the network of nerves that originate from cervical and upper thoracic nerve roots and eventually terminate as the named nerves that innervate the muscles and skin of the arm. Brachial plexopathies are not common in most practices, but a detailed knowledge of this plexus is important for distinguishing between brachial plexopathies, radiculopathies and mononeuropathies. It is impossible to write a paper on brachial plexopathies without addressing cervical radiculopathies and root avulsions as well. In this paper will review brachial plexus anatomy, clinical features of brachial plexopathies, differential diagnosis, specific nerve conduction techniques, appropriate protocols and case studies. The reader will gain insight to this uncommon nerve problem as well as the importance of the nerve conduction studies used to confirm the diagnosis of plexopathies. Anatomy of the Brachial Plexus: To assess the brachial plexus by localizing the lesion at the correct level, as well as the severity of the injury requires knowledge of the anatomy. An injury involves any condition that impairs the function of the brachial plexus. The plexus is derived of five roots, three trunks, two divisions, three cords, and five branches/nerves. Spinal roots join to form the spinal nerve. There are dorsal and ventral roots that emerge and carry motor and sensory fibers. Motor (efferent) carries messages from the brain and spinal cord to the peripheral nerves. This Dorsal Root Sensory (afferent) carries messages from the peripheral to the Ganglion is why spinal cord or both. A small ganglion containing cell bodies of sensory NCS’s sensory fibers lies on each posterior root. -
Strategies to Improve Nerve Regeneration After Radical Prostatectomy: a Narrative Review
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Research Information System University of Turin Strategies to improve nerve regeneration after radical prostatectomy: a narrative review Stefano Geuna 1, 2, Luisa Muratori1, 2, Federica Fregnan 1, 2, Matteo Manfredi4 , Riccardo Bertolo 3, 4 , Francesco Porpiglia4. 1 Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Orbassano (To), 10043, Italy. 2 Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), Orbassano (To), 10043, Italy. 3 Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, US. 4 Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano (To), 10043, Italy. Abstract Peripheral nerves are complex organs that spread throughout the entire human body. They are frequently affected by lesions not only as a result of trauma but also following radical tumor resection. In fact, despite the advancement in surgical techniques, such as nerve- sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy, some degree of nerve injury may occur resulting in erectile dysfunction with significant impairment of the quality of life. The aim of this review is to provide an overview on the mechanisms of the regeneration of injured peripheral nerves and to describe the potential strategies to improve the regeneration process and the functional recovery. Yet, the recent advances in bio- engineering strategies to promote nerve regeneration in the urological field are outlined with a view on the possible future regenerative therapies which might ameliorate the functional outcome after radical prostatectomy. 1 Introduction Radical prostatectomy is the gold standard surgical treatment for organ-confined prostate cancer. The employment of innovative surgical technique such as nerve-sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy allowed to magnify the anatomical field leading to a three- dimensional perspective obtained through the robotic lenses and a better anatomical knowledge. -
Central Adaptation Following Brachial Plexus Injury
UCSF UC San Francisco Previously Published Works Title Central Adaptation following Brachial Plexus Injury. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2ds5z53m Authors Simon, Neil G Franz, Colin K Gupta, Nalin et al. Publication Date 2016 DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.027 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Literature Reviews Central Adaptation following Brachial Plexus Injury Neil G. Simon1, Colin K. Franz2,3, Nalin Gupta4, Tord Alden5,6, Michel Kliot6 Key words Brachial plexus trauma (BPT) often affects young patients and may result in - Apraxia lasting functional deficits. Standard care following BPT involves monitoring for - Brachial plexus injury - Central adaptation clinical and electrophysiological evidence of muscle reinnervation, with sur- - Nerve trauma gical treatment decisions based on the presence or absence of spontaneous - Neuroplasticity recovery. Data are emerging to suggest that central and peripheral adaptation may play a role in recovery following BPT. The present review highlights Abbreviations and Acronyms BPT: Brachial plexus trauma adaptive and maladaptive mechanisms of central and peripheral nervous system CIMT: Constraint-induced movement therapy changes following BPT that may contribute to functional outcomes. Rehabili- CNS: Central nervous system tation and other treatment strategies that harness or modulate these intrinsic EMG: Electromyography adaptive mechanisms may improve functional outcomes following BPT. ES: Electrical stimulation H-reflex: Hoffman reflex MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging OBPP: Obstetric brachial plexus palsy PNI: Peripheral nerve injury RECOVERY FROM BPT functional recovery, with no residual def- fi Recovery of nerve tracts following BPT icits identi ed on serial clinician or phys- 1St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South 1 2 relies on a complex cascade of peripheral iotherapist review. -
Anatomical Study of the Brachial Plexus in Human Fetuses and Its Relation with Neonatal Upper Limb Paralysis
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Anatomical study of the brachial plexus Official Publication of the Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein in human fetuses and its relation with neonatal upper limb paralysis ISSN: 1679-4508 | e-ISSN: 2317-6385 Estudo anatômico do plexo braquial de fetos humanos e sua relação com paralisias neonatais do membro superior Marcelo Rodrigues da Cunha1, Amanda Aparecida Magnusson Dias1, Jacqueline Mendes de Brito2, Cristiane da Silva Cruz1, Samantha Ketelyn Silva1 1 Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil. 2 Centro Universitário Padre Anchieta, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil. DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5051 ❚ ABSTRACT Objective: To study the anatomy of the brachial plexus in fetuses and to evaluate differences in morphology during evolution, or to find anatomical situations that can be identified as the cause of obstetric paralysis. Methods: Nine fetuses (12 to 30 weeks of gestation) stored in formalin were used. The supraclavicular and infraclavicular parts of the brachial plexus were dissected. Results: In its early course, the brachial plexus had a cord-like shape when it passed through the scalene hiatus. Origin of the phrenic nerve in the brachial plexus was observed in only one fetus. In the deep infraclavicular and retropectoralis minor spaces, the nerve fibers of the brachial plexus were distributed in the axilla and medial bicipital groove, where they formed the nerve endings. Conclusion: The brachial plexus of human fetuses presents variations and relations with anatomical structures that must be considered during clinical and surgical procedures for neonatal paralysis of the upper limbs. How to cite this article: Cunha MR, Dias AA, Brito JM, Cruz CS, Silva Keywords: Brachial plexus/anatomy & histology; Fetus/abnormalities; Paralysis SK. -
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (Revised 2011)
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011) Steven C. Kirshblum1,2, Stephen P. Burns3, Fin Biering-Sorensen4, William Donovan5, Daniel E. Graves6, Amitabh Jha7, Mark Johansen7, Linda Jones8, Andrei Krassioukov9, M.J. Mulcahey10, Mary Schmidt-Read11, William Waring12 The authors are the members of the International Standards Committee of ASIA. 1UMDNJ/New Jersey Medical School, 2Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, 3University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, 4Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 5University of Texas, Houston, Texas, 6University of Kentucky, 7Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO, 8Geron Corporation, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 9International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 10Shriners Hospital for Children, 11Magee Rehabilitation Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, 12Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Introduction above which they exit (i.e. C1 exits above the C1 vertebra, This article represents the content of the booklet, just below the skull and C6 nerve roots pass between the International Standards for Neurological Classification C5 and C6 vertebrae) whereas C8 exists between the C7 of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2011, published by the and T1 vertebra; as there is no C8 vertebra. The C1 American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). For further nerve root does not have a sensory component that is explanation of the clarifications and changes in this tested on the International Standards Examination. revision, see the accompanying article (Kirshblum S., The thoracic spine has 12 distinct nerve roots and the et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011:DOI 10.1179/ lumbar spine consists of 5 distinct nerve roots that are 107902611X13186000420242 each named accordingly as they exit below the level of the The spinal cord is the major conduit through which respective vertebrae. -
Anatomical, Clinical, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Radial Neuropathies
Anatomical, Clinical, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Radial Neuropathies a, b Leo H. Wang, MD, PhD *, Michael D. Weiss, MD KEYWORDS Radial Posterior interosseous Neuropathy Electrodiagnostic study KEY POINTS The radial nerve subserves the extensor compartment of the arm. Radial nerve lesions are common because of the length and winding course of the nerve. The radial nerve is in direct contact with bone at the midpoint and distal third of the humerus, and therefore most vulnerable to compression or contusion from fractures. Electrodiagnostic studies are useful to localize and characterize the injury as axonal or demyelinating. Radial neuropathies at the midhumeral shaft tend to have good prognosis. INTRODUCTION The radial nerve is the principal nerve in the upper extremity that subserves the extensor compartments of the arm. It has a long and winding course rendering it vulnerable to injury. Radial neuropathies are commonly a consequence of acute trau- matic injury and only rarely caused by entrapment in the absence of such an injury. This article reviews the anatomy of the radial nerve, common sites of injury and their presentation, and the electrodiagnostic approach to localizing the lesion. ANATOMY OF THE RADIAL NERVE Course of the Radial Nerve The radial nerve subserves the extensors of the arms and fingers and the sensory nerves of the extensor surface of the arm.1–3 Because it serves the sensory and motor Disclosures: Dr Wang has no relevant disclosures. Dr Weiss is a consultant for CSL-Behring and a speaker for Grifols Inc. and Walgreens. He has research support from the Northeast ALS Consortium and ALS Therapy Alliance. -
Neuropathology Category Code List
Neuropathology Page 1 of 27 Neuropathology Major Category Code Headings Revised 10/2018 1 General neuroanatomy, pathology, and staining 65000 2 Developmental neuropathology, NOS 65400 3 Epilepsy 66230 4 Vascular disorders 66300 5 Trauma 66600 6 Infectious/inflammatory disease 66750 7 Demyelinating diseases 67200 8 Complications of systemic disorders 67300 9 Aging and neurodegenerative diseases 68000 10 Prion diseases 68400 11 Neoplasms 68500 12 Skeletal Muscle 69500 13 Peripheral Nerve 69800 14 Ophthalmic pathology 69910 Neuropathology Page 2 of 27 Neuropathology 1 General neuroanatomy, pathology, and staining 65000 A Neuroanatomy, NOS 65010 1 Neocortex 65011 2 White matter 65012 3 Entorhinal cortex/hippocampus 65013 4 Deep (basal) nuclei 65014 5 Brain stem 65015 6 Cerebellum 65016 7 Spinal cord 65017 8 Pituitary 65018 9 Pineal 65019 10 Tracts 65020 11 Vascular supply 65021 12 Notochord 65022 B Cell types 65030 1 Neurons 65031 2 Astrocytes 65032 3 Oligodendroglia 65033 4 Ependyma 65034 5 Microglia and mononuclear cells 65035 6 Choroid plexus 65036 7 Meninges 65037 8 Blood vessels 65038 C Cerebrospinal fluid 65045 D Pathologic responses in neurons and axons 65050 1 Axonal degeneration/spheroid/reaction 65051 2 Central chromatolysis 65052 3 Tract degeneration 65053 4 Swollen/ballooned neurons 65054 5 Trans-synaptic neuronal degeneration 65055 6 Olivary hypertrophy 65056 7 Acute ischemic (hypoxic) cell change 65057 8 Apoptosis 65058 9 Protein aggregation 65059 10 Protein degradation/ubiquitin pathway 65060 E Neuronal nuclear inclusions 65100 -
Some Variations in the Formation of the Brachial Plexus in Infants*
Tr. J. of Medical Sciences 29 (1999) 573–577 © TÜBİTAK Ahmet UZUN1 Some Variations in the Formation of the Brachial Sait BİLGİÇ2 Plexus in Infants* Received: June 23.1998 Abstract: The anatomical variations of the directly from a branch of the anterior brachial plexus in human have clinical division of the middle trunk (Fig.3,A). Group significance to surgeons, radiologists and 2 had three anterior division cords: a) the anatomists. We studied some variations in lateral cord formed from anterior division the formation of 130 brachial plexuses in of the upper trunk (Fig.2, A); b) an sixty-five infant cadavers (34 males, 31 “intermediate” cord formed from the females; aged 1-7 days). The brachial plexus anterior division of the middle trunk and c) consisted of the 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th cervical the medial cord formed from the anterior spinal nerves and 1st thoracic spinal nerve division of the lower trunk (3.07%). In (69.23%). We found that among the 130 group 3, there was a rare variation of the plexuses, 30.77% also received a medial cord (1.54%) which receives an contribution from C4 (Fig.1, A ) . The anastomotic branch from the posterior variations in the formation of brachial division of the middle trunk (Fig.4, B). The 1Department of Anatomy, Inonu University, plexuses were classified into three groups. anomalies of the human brachial plexus have School of Medicine, 44100 Malatya-Turkey Group 1 had a variation in the formation of clinical importence in diagnosis of injuries of 2Department of Anatomy, Ondokuz Mayis the median nerve (10.77%), with fusion of the brachial plexus. -
High-Resolution 3T MR Neurography of the Brachial Plexus and Its Branches, with Emphasis on 3D Imaging
REVIEW ARTICLE High-Resolution 3T MR Neurography of the Brachial Plexus and Its Branches, with Emphasis on 3D Imaging A. Chhabra, G.K. Thawait, T. Soldatos, R.S. Thakkar, F. Del Grande, M. Chalian, and J.A. Carrino ABSTRACT SUMMARY: With advancement in 3D imaging, better fat-suppression techniques, and superior coil designs for MR imaging and the increasing availability and use of 3T magnets, the visualization of the complexity of the brachial plexus has become facile. The relevant imaging findings are described for normal and pathologic conditions of the brachial plexus. These radiologic findings are supported by clinical and/or EMG/surgical data, and corresponding high-resolution MR neurography images are illustrated. Because the brachial plexus can be affected by a plethora of pathologies, resulting in often serious and disabling complications, a better radiologic insight has great potential in aiding physicians in rendering superior services to patients. ABBREVIATIONS: EMG ϭ electromyography; MIP ϭ maximum intensity projection; MRN ϭ MR neurography; SPACE ϭ sampling perfection with application- optimized contrasts by using different flip angle; STIR ϭ short tau inversion recovery, TOS ϭ thoracic outlet syndrome he brachial plexus is a network of nerve confluences and ram- nerve (C5-C7) to the serratus anterior muscle arise directly from Tifications, which combine to form the large terminal branches the nerve roots.1,2,5 that supply motor and sensory branches to the upper extremities. The clinical differentiation of brachial plexopathy from other Trunks and Their Anatomic Relations spine-related abnormalities often poses a considerable diagnostic The C5 and C6 nerve roots compose the upper trunk, C7 contin- challenge, and electrodiagnostic tests are difficult to perform due ues as the middle trunk, and C8 and T1 compose the lower trunk. -
OIICS Manual 2012
SECTION 2 Definitions, Rules of Selection, and Titles and Descriptions SECTION CONTENTS 2.1 Nature of Injury or Illness 2.2 Part of Body Affected 2.3 Source and Secondary Source of Injury or Illness 2.4 Event or Exposure *-Asterisks denote a summary level code not assigned to individual cases. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 01/12 6 SECTION 2.1 Nature of Injury or Illness SECTION CONTENTS 2.1.1 Definition, Rules of Selection 2.1.2 Titles and Descriptions *-Asterisks denote a summary level code not assigned to individual cases. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 01/12 7 2.1.1 Nature of Injury or Illness—Definition, Rules of Selection 1.0 DEFINITION The nature of injury or illness identifies the principal physical characteristic(s) of the work related injury or illness. RULES OF SELECTION: 1.1 Name the injury or illness indicated on the source document. Example: For strained back, choose Strains. 1.2 When two or more injuries or illnesses are indicated, and one is a sequela, aftereffect, complication due to medical treatment, or re-injury, choose the initial injury or illness. Example: If a laceration became infected developing into septicemia, choose Cuts, lacerations. 1.3 When two or more injuries or illnesses are indicated and one is more severe than the other(s) and is not a sequela or complication of the other injury or illness, select the more severe injury or illness. Example: For sprained finger and fractured wrist, choose Fractures. 1.3.1 When a single event or exposure produces an injury and transmits a disease simultaneously, and one is more severe than the other(s), select the more severe injury or disease. -
Electrodiagnosis of Brachial Plexopathies and Proximal Upper Extremity Neuropathies
Electrodiagnosis of Brachial Plexopathies and Proximal Upper Extremity Neuropathies Zachary Simmons, MD* KEYWORDS Brachial plexus Brachial plexopathy Axillary nerve Musculocutaneous nerve Suprascapular nerve Nerve conduction studies Electromyography KEY POINTS The brachial plexus provides all motor and sensory innervation of the upper extremity. The plexus is usually derived from the C5 through T1 anterior primary rami, which divide in various ways to form the upper, middle, and lower trunks; the lateral, posterior, and medial cords; and multiple terminal branches. Traction is the most common cause of brachial plexopathy, although compression, lacer- ations, ischemia, neoplasms, radiation, thoracic outlet syndrome, and neuralgic amyotro- phy may all produce brachial plexus lesions. Upper extremity mononeuropathies affecting the musculocutaneous, axillary, and supra- scapular motor nerves and the medial and lateral antebrachial cutaneous sensory nerves often occur in the context of more widespread brachial plexus damage, often from trauma or neuralgic amyotrophy but may occur in isolation. Extensive electrodiagnostic testing often is needed to properly localize lesions of the brachial plexus, frequently requiring testing of sensory nerves, which are not commonly used in the assessment of other types of lesions. INTRODUCTION Few anatomic structures are as daunting to medical students, residents, and prac- ticing physicians as the brachial plexus. Yet, detailed understanding of brachial plexus anatomy is central to electrodiagnosis because of the plexus’ role in supplying all motor and sensory innervation of the upper extremity and shoulder girdle. There also are several proximal upper extremity nerves, derived from the brachial plexus, Conflicts of Interest: None. Neuromuscular Program and ALS Center, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, PA, USA * Department of Neurology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, EC 037 30 Hope Drive, PO Box 859, Hershey, PA 17033.