DOCSLIB.ORG

Brassicaceae: Species Checklist and Database on CD-Rom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brassicaceae: Species Checklist and Database on CD-Rom Pl. Syst. Evol. 259: 249–258 (2006) DOI 10.1007/s00606-006-0422-0 Brassicaceae: Species checklist and database on CD-Rom S. I. Warwick1, A. Francis1, and I. A. Al-Shehbaz2 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 2Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, USA Received October 6, 2005; accepted November 17, 2005 Published online: June 19, 2006 Ó Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract. A species checklist has been prepared for rank) on the basis of the most recent taxo- the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) family, providing the nomic/floristic treatments for specific regions, first updated list in over 70 years. The family, e.g. Europe (Jalas and Suominen 1994, Jalas et currently, includes 338 genera and 3709 species. al. 1996), North America (Rollins 1993), China The database contains approximately 14,000 taxo- (Zhou et al. 2001), etc. (see literature cited). nomic names (records). Taxon status and synon- Our decisions were also based on the many ymy, taxon name, scientific authority, literature taxonomic changes that have resulted from source and source verification, and the basionym are provided for each record. recent molecular phylogenetic studies. Cur- rently, 338 genera and 3709 species are Key words: Brassicaceae, species checklist, accepted (Table 1). Recent changes include Cruciferae, taxonomy, database. transfers from Arabis to Boechera in North America; from Braya to Xerodraba in South America, from Sisymbrium to Crucihimalaya and Olimarabidopsis in Central Asia, and from Introduction to the database Cochlearia or Cardamine to Yinshania A species checklist has been prepared for the in China. Within North America, most species Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) family. The last of Lesquerella were found to be better placed comprehensive monographic treatment of the with the earlier-described genus Physaria, family was that of Schulz (1936). The current while one group of auriculate-leaved taxonomic database (Microsoft access format) Lesquerella species was segregated into the contains approximately 14,000 plant names, genus Paysonia. As a result, the genus Lesque- compiled from the taxonomic literature start- rella has been placed in synonymy. Other ing with Linnaeus’s Species Plantarum in 1753 genera, whose reduction to synonymy is widely to the present and floras from all parts of the accepted, include Dentaria (now Cardamine), world, as well as numerous journal publica- Coronopus (now Lepidium), Guenthera (now tions, including monographs, revisions, and Brassica), Eunomia (now Aethionema), Ero- synopses. The authors have made decisions on phila (now Draba) and Hutchinsia, Pritzelago the status of all taxa (at least at the specific and Hymenolobus (now Hornungia). 250 S. I. Warwick et al.: Brassicaceae: Species checklist Table 1. List of genera and accepted number of Table 1. (Continued) species in the Brassicaceae Calepina Adans. 1 Genus No. of Callothlaspi F.K. Mey. 1 species Calymmatium O.E. Schulz 2 Camelina Crantz 11 Acanthocardamum Thell. 1 Camelinopsis A.G. Mill. 1 ´ Achoriphragma Sojak4Capsella Medik. 5 Aethionema R. Br. 56 Cardamine L. 197 Alliaria Heist. ex Fabr. 2 Carinavalva Ising 1 Alyssoides Mill. 2 Carrichtera DC. 1 Alyssopsis Boiss. 2 Catadysia O.E. Schulz 1 Alyssum L. 195 Catenulina Soja´ k1 Ammosperma Hook. f. 2 Catolobus (C.A. Mey.) Al-Shehbaz 1 Anastatica L. 1 Caulanthus S. Watson 17 Anchonium DC. 2 Ceratocnemum Coss. & Balansa 1 Andrzeiowskia Rchb. 1 Chalcanthus Boiss. 1 Anelsonia J.F. Macbr. & Payson 1 Chamira Thunb. 1 Aphragmus Andrz. ex DC. 11 Chartoloma Bunge 1 Aplanodes Marais 2 Chaunanthus O.E. Schulz 3 Arabidella (F. Muell.) O.E. Schulz 6 Chilocardamum O.E. Schulz 1 Arabidopsis (DC.) Heynh. 11 Chlorocrambe Rydb. 1 Arabis L. 118 Chorispora R. Br. ex DC. 11 Arcyosperma O.E. Schulz 1 Christolea Cambess. ex Jacquem. 2 Armoracia Gaertn., B. Mey. & Scherb. 3 Chrysochamela (Fenzl) Boiss. 3 Aschersoniodoxa Gilg & Muschl. 3 Cithareloma Bunge 3 Asperuginoides Rauschert 1 Clastopus Bunge ex Boiss. 2 Asta Klotzsch & O.E. Schulz ex 2 Clausia Korn.-Trotzky 6 O.E. Schulz Clypeola L. 9 Atelanthera Hook. f. & Thomson 1 Cochlearia L. 19 Athysanus Greene 2 Coincya Porta & Rigo ex Rouy 6 Aubrieta Adans. 12 Coluteocarpus Boiss. 1 Aurinia Desv. 9 Conringia Heist. ex Fabr. 6 Baimashania Al-Shehbaz 2 Cordylocarpus Desf. 1 Ballantinia Hook. f. ex E.A. Shaw 1 Crambe L. 34 Barbarea R. Br. 29 Crambella Maire 1 Berteroa DC. 5 Cremolobus DC. 8 Berteroella O.E. Schulz 1 Crucihimalaya Al-Shehbaz, 9 Biscutella L. 53 O’Kane & R.A. Price Bivonaea DC. 1 Cryptospora Kar. & Kir. 3 Blennodia R. Br. 2 Cuphonotus O.E. Schulz 2 Boechera A. Lo¨ ve & D. Lo¨ ve 65 Cusickiella Rollins 2 Boreava Jaub. & Spach 2 Cymatocarpus O.E. Schulz 3 Bornmuellera Hausskn. 7 Cyphocardamum Hedge 1 Borodinia N. Busch 1 Dactylocardamum Al-Shehbaz 1 Botschantzevia Nabiev 1 Degenia Hayek 1 Brassica L. 39 Delpinophytum Speg. 1 Braya Sternb. & Hoppe 13 Descurainia Webb & Berthel. 48 Brayopsis Gilg & Muschl. 6 Desideria Pamp. 12 Brossardia Boiss. 1 Diceratella Boiss. 11 Bunias L. 3 Dichasianthus Ovcz. & Yunussov 1 Cakile Mill. 6 Dictyophragmus O.E. Schulz 2 S. I. Warwick et al.: Brassicaceae: Species checklist 251 Table 1. (Continued) Table 1. (Continued) Genus No. of Halimolobos Tausch 16 species Harmsiodoxa O.E. Schulz 3 Heldreichia Boiss. 4 Didesmus Desv. 2 Heliophila L. 82 Didymophysa Boiss. 2 Hemicrambe Webb 3 Dielsiocharis O.E. Schulz 2 Hemilophia Franch. 5 Dilophia Thomson 2 Henophyton Coss. & Durieu 2 Dimorphocarpa Rollins 4 Hesperidanthus (B.L. Rob.) Rydb. 5 Diplotaxis DC. 32 Hesperis L. 46 Dipoma Franch. 1 Hollermayera O.E. Schulz 1 Diptychocarpus Trautv. 1 Hormathophylla Cullen & T.R. Dudley 10 Dithyrea Harv. 2 Hornungia Rchb. 3 Dontostemon Andrz. ex C.A. Mey. 11 Horwoodia Turrill 1 Douepea Cambess. ex Jacquem. 2 Hutchinsia R. Br. 1 Draba L. 363 Ianhedgea Al-Shehbaz & O’Kane 1 Drabastrum (F. Muell.) O.E. Schulz 1 Iberis L. 27 Dryopetalon A. Gray 5 Idahoa A. Nelson & J.F. Macbr. 1 Eigia Soja´ k1Iodanthus Torr. & A. Gray ex Steud. 1 Elburzia Hedge 1 Ionopsidium (DC.) Rchb. 5 Enarthrocarpus Labill. 5 Irenepharsus Hewson 3 Englerocharis Muschl. 2 Isatis L. 79 Eremobium Boiss. 1 Iskandera N. Busch 2 Eremoblastus Botsch. 1 Ivania O.E. Schulz 1 Eremodraba O.E. Schulz 2 Kernera Medik. 1 Eremophyton Be´ g. 1 Kremeriella Maire 1 Eruca Mill. 4 Lachnocapsa Balf. f. 1 Erucaria Gaertn. 10 Lachnoloma Bunge 1 Erucastrum (DC.) C. Presl 25 Leavenworthia Torr. 8 Erysimum L. 223 Leiospora (C.A. Mey.) F. Dvora´ k6 Euclidium R. Br. 1 Lepidium L. 231 Eudema Humb. & Bonpl. 6 Lepidostemon Hook. f. & Thomson 6 Eunomia DC. 1 Leptaleum DC. 1 Eurycarpus Botsch. 2 Lithodraba Boelcke 1 Eutrema R. Br. 26 Litwinowia Woronow 1 Farsetia Turra 27 Lobularia Desv. 4 Fezia Pit. ex Batt. 1 Lunaria L. 3 Fibigia Medik. 13 Lyrocarpa Hook. & Harv. 3 Foleyola Maire 1 Macropodium R. Br. 2 Fortuynia Shuttlw. ex Boiss. 2 Malcolmia R. Br. 32 Fourraea Greuter & Burdet 1 Mancoa Wedd. 11 Gagria M. Kra´ l1Maresia Pomel 3 Galitzkya V.V. Botschantz. 3 Mathewsia Hook. & Arn. 10 Geococcus J.L. Drumm. ex Harv. 1 Matthiola R. Br. 48 Glastaria Boiss. 1 Megacarpaea DC. 9 Goldbachia DC. 5 Megadenia Maxim. 1 Graellsia Boiss. 8 Menkea Lehm. 6 Grammosperma O.E. Schulz 1 Menonvillea DC. 24 Guillenia Greene 1 Microlepidium F. Muell. 2 Guiraoa Coss. 1 Microstigma Trautv. 3 Gynophora Gilli 1 Microthlaspi F.K. Mey. 4 252 S. I. Warwick et al.: Brassicaceae: Species checklist Table 1. (Continued) Table 1. (Continued) Genus No. of Phlebolobium O.E. Schulz 1 species Phlegmatospermum O.E. Schulz 4 Phoenicaulis Nutt. 1 Morettia DC. 3 Physaria (Nutt.) A. Gray 105 Moricandia DC. 8 Physocardamum Hedge 1 Moriera Boiss. 1 Physoptychis Boiss. 2 Morisia J. Gay 1 Physorhynchus Hook. 2 Murbeckiella Rothm. 5 Planodes Greene 1 Muricaria Desv. 1 Polyctenium Greene 2 Myagrum L. 1 Polypsecadium O.E. Schulz 3 Nasturtiopsis Boiss. 1 Pringlea Anderson ex Hook. f. 1 Nasturtium R. Br. 10 Pseuderucaria (Boiss.) O.E. Schulz 2 Neotchihatchewia Rauschert 1 Pseudoarabidopsis Al-Shehbaz, 1 Neotorularia Hedge & J. Le´ onard 11 O’Kane & R.A. Price Nerisyrenia Greene 8 Pseudocamelina (Boiss.) N. Busch 3 Neslia Desv. 1 Pseudoclausia Popov 10 Neuontobotrys O.E. Schulz 5 Pseudofortuynia Hedge 1 Nevada N.H. Holmgren 1 Pseudosempervivum (Boiss.) Grossh. 3 Noccaea Moench 77 Pseudoturritis Al-Shehbaz 1 Noccidium F.K. Mey. 1 Pseudovesicaria (Boiss.) Rupr. 1 Notoceras R. Br. 1 Psychine Desf. 1 Notothlaspi Hook. f. 2 Pterygiosperma O.E. Schulz 1 Ochthodium DC. 1 Pugionium Gaertn. 3 Octoceras Bunge 1 Pycnoplinthopsis Jafri 1 Olimarabidopsis Al-Shehbaz, 3 Pycnoplinthus O.E. Schulz 1 O’Kane & R.A. Price Quezeliantha H. Scholz ex Rauschert 1 Onuris Phil. 6 Raffenaldia Godr. 2 Oreoblastus Suslova 1 Raphanoryncha Rollins 1 Oreoloma Botsch. 3 Raphanus L. 3 Oreophyton O.E. Schulz 1 Rapistrum Crantz 2 Ornithocarpa Rose 2 Rhammatophyllum O.E. Schulz 10 Orychophragmus Bunge 2 Rhizobotrya Tausch 1 Otocarpus Durieu 1 Ricotia L. 9 Pachycladon Hook. f. 10 Robeschia Hochst. ex O.E. Schulz 1 Pachymitus O.E. Schulz 1 Rollinsia Al-Shehbaz 1 Pachyneurum Bunge 1 Romanschulzia O.E. Schulz 13 Pachyphragma (DC.) Rchb. 1 Rorippa Scop. 86 Pachypterygium Bunge 3 Rytidocarpus Coss. 1 Parlatoria Boiss. 2 Sameraria Desv. 9 Parodiodoxa O.E. Schulz 1 Sandbergia Greene 1 Parolinia Webb 5 Sarcodraba Gilg & Muschl. 3 Parrya R. Br. 34 Savignya DC. 1 Paysonia O’Kane & Al-Shehbaz 8 Scambopus O.E. Schulz 1 Pegaeophyton Hayek 7 Schimpera Hochst. & Steud. ex Endl. 1 & Hand.-Mazz. Schivereckia Andrz. ex DC. 2 Peltaria Jacq. 4 Schizopetalon Sims 10 Peltariopsis (Boiss.) N. Busch 2 Schouwia DC. 1 Pennellia Nieuwl. 9 Scoliaxon Payson 1 Petrocallis R. Br. 1 Selenia Nutt. 4 Petroravenia Al-Shehbaz 1 Shangrilaia Al-Shehbaz, 1 Phaeonychium O.E.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Plant Propagation Protocol
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Carex inops ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production TAXONOMY Family Names Family Scientific Name: Cyperaceae Family Common Name: Sedge Scientific Names Genus: Carex Species: inops Species Authority: L. H. Bailey Variety: Sub-species: Cultivar: Authority for Variety/Sub-species: Common Synonym(s) (include full CAINI3 Carex inops L.H. Bailey ssp inops scientific names (e.g., Elymus CAINH2 Carex inops ssp heliophila (Mack.) Crins glaucus Buckley), including variety Synonyms for ssp heliophila or subspecies information) CAER5 Carex erxlebeniana L. Kelso CAHE5 Carex heliophila Mack. CAPEH Carex pensylvanica Lam. ssp. Heliophila (Mack.) W.A. Weber CAPED Carex pensylvanica Lam. var. digyna Boeckeler Common Name(s): long-stolon sedge or sun sedge (ssp heliophila) Species Code (as per USDA Plants CAIN9 database): GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range (distribution maps for North America and Washington state) http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=CAIN9 http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=CAIN9 Ecological distribution (ecosystems it Found in shortgrass, mixed, and tallgrass prairies, as occurs in, etc): well as Ponderosa pine communities and other woodlands (Fryer 2009) Climate and elevation range Dry to seasonally wet climates. Occasionally found at elevations > 5000 ft.(Fryer 2009) Local habitat and abundance; may May dominate to co-dominate in some systems. High include commonly associated prevelance and persistance even in systems where it is species not the dominant species. (Fryer 2009) Plant strategy
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosomal Evolution and Apomixis in the Cruciferous Tribe Boechereae
    fpls-11-00514 May 26, 2020 Time: 17:57 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 28 May 2020 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00514 Chromosomal Evolution and Apomixis in the Cruciferous Tribe Boechereae Terezie Mandáková1, Petra Hloušková1, Michael D. Windham2, Thomas Mitchell-Olds2, Kaylynn Ashby3, Bo Price3, John Carman3 and Martin A. Lysak1* 1 CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia, 2 Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States, 3 Plants, Soils, and Climate Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States The mustard family (Brassicaceae) comprises several dozen monophyletic clades usually ranked as tribes. The tribe Boechereae plays a prominent role in plant research due to the incidence of apomixis and its close relationship to Arabidopsis. This tribe, largely confined to western North America, harbors nine genera and c. 130 species, with >90% of species belonging to the genus Boechera. Hundreds of apomictic diploid and triploid Boechera hybrids have spurred interest in this genus, but the remaining Boechereae genomes remain virtually unstudied. Here we report on comparative Edited by: genome structure of six genera (Borodinia, Cusickiella, Phoenicaulis, Polyctenium, Steven Dodsworth, Nevada, and Sandbergia) and three Boechera species as revealed by comparative University of Bedfordshire, United Kingdom chromosome painting (CCP). All analyzed taxa shared the same seven-chromosome Reviewed by: genome structure. Comparisons with the sister Halimolobeae tribe (n = 8) showed Ana Paula Moraes, that the ancestral Boechereae genome (n = 7) was derived from an older n = 8 Universidade Federal do ABC, Brazil Aretuza Sousa Dos Santos, genome by descending dysploidy followed by the divergence of extant Boechereae Ludwig Maximilian University taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpinia Galanga (L.) Willd
    TAXON: Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd. SCORE: 5.0 RATING: Low Risk Taxon: Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd. Family: Zingiberaceae Common Name(s): false galangal Synonym(s): Languas galanga (L.) Stuntz greater galanga Maranta galanga L. languas Siamese-ginger Thai ginger Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 16 Jun 2016 WRA Score: 5.0 Designation: L Rating: Low Risk Keywords: Rhizomatous, Naturalized, Edible, Self-Compatible, Pollinator-Limited Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) Low 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens y=1, n=0 n 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 n Creation Date: 16 Jun 2016 (Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd.) Page 1 of 15 TAXON: Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Systematics of the Tribe Thlaspideae (Brassicaceae) and the Recognition of Two New Genera Shokouh Esmailbegi, Ihsan A
    Vol. 67 (2) • April 2018 International Journal of Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Evolution Electronic Supplement to Phylogeny and systematics of the tribe Thlaspideae (Brassicaceae) and the recognition of two new genera Shokouh Esmailbegi, Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz, Milan Pouch, Terezie Mandáková, Klaus Mummenhoff, Mohammad Reza Rahiminejad, Mansour Mirtadzadini & Martin A. Lysak Taxon 67: 324–340 (https://doi.org/10.12705/672.4) https://doi.org/10.12705/672.4.S1 (DNA sequence alignment: https://doi.org/10.12705/672.4.S2) TAXON 67 (2) • April 2018 Electr. Suppl. to: Esmailbegi & al. • Phylogeny and systematics of Thlaspideae (Brassicaceae) Table S1. ITS and trnL-F primers used in phylogenetic study. Gene Primer Sequence Reference ITS ITS1 TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G White & al., 1990 ITS4 TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC White & al., 1990 ITS-18F GGA AGG AGA AGT CGT AAC AAG G Mummenhoff & al., 1997 trnL-F tabC CGA AAT CGG TAG ACG CTA CG Shaw & al., 2005 tabF ATT TGA ACT GGT GAC ACG AG Shaw & al., 2005 White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315–322 in: Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. & White, T.J. (eds.), PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. Mummenhoff, K., Franzke, A. & Koch, M. 1997. Molecular data reveal convergence in fruit characters used in the classification of Thlaspi s.l. (Brassicaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 125: 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1997.tb02253.x Shaw, J., Lickey, E., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.B., Liu, W., Miller, J., Siripun, K.C., Winder, C.T., Schilling, E.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Alien Plnat Species.Pdf
    Punjab ENVIS Centre NEWSLETTER Vol. 11, No. 4, 2013-14 INVASIVE ALIEN PLANT SPECIES IN PUNJAB l Inform ta at n io e n m S Status of Environment & Related Issues n y o s r t i e v m n E www.punenvis.nic.in INDIA EDITORIAL The World Conservation Union (IUCN) defines alien invasive species as organisms that become established in native ecosystems or habitats, proliferate, alter, and threaten native biodiversity. These aliens come in the form of plants, animals and microbes that have been introduced into an area from other parts of the world, and have been able to displace indigenous species. Invasive alien species are emerging as one of the major threats to sustainable development, on a par with global warming and the destruction of life-support systems. Increased mobility and human interaction have been key drivers in the spread of Indigenous Alien Species. Invasion by alien species is a global phenomenon, with threatening negative impacts to the indigenous biological diversity as well as related negative impacts on human health and overall his well-being. Thus, threatening the ecosystems on the earth. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) found that trends in species introductions, as well as modelling predictions, strongly suggest that biological invasions will continue to increase in number and impact. An additional concern is that multiple human impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems will decrease the natural biotic resistance to invasions and, therefore, the number of biotic communities dominated by invasive species will increase. India one of the 17 "megadiverse" countries and is composed of a diversity of ecological habitats like forests, grasslands, wetlands, coastal and marine ecosystems, and desert ecosystems have been reported with 40 percent of alien flora species and 25 percent out of them invasive by National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxa Named in Honor of Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz
    TAXA NAMED IN HONOR OF IHSAN A. AL-SHEHBAZ 1. Tribe Shehbazieae D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 22. 2014. 2. Shehbazia D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 20. 2014. 3. Shehbazia tibetica (Maxim.) D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 20. 2014. 4. Astragalus shehbazii Zarre & Podlech, Feddes Repert. 116: 70. 2005. 5. Bornmuellerantha alshehbaziana Dönmez & Mutlu, Novon 20: 265. 2010. 6. Centaurea shahbazii Ranjbar & Negaresh, Edinb. J. Bot. 71: 1. 2014. 7. Draba alshehbazii Klimeš & D. A. German, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 158: 750. 2008. 8. Ferula shehbaziana S. A. Ahmad, Harvard Pap. Bot. 18: 99. 2013. 9. Matthiola shehbazii Ranjbar & Karami, Nordic J. Bot. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00326.x, 10. Plocama alshehbazii F. O. Khass., D. Khamr., U. Khuzh. & Achilova, Stapfia 101: 25. 2014. 11. Alshehbazia Salariato & Zuloaga, Kew Bulletin …….. 2015 12. Alshehbzia hauthalii (Gilg & Muschl.) Salariato & Zuloaga 13. Ihsanalshehbazia Tahir Ali & Thines, Taxon 65: 93. 2016. 14. Ihsanalshehbazia granatensis (Boiss. & Reuter) Tahir Ali & Thines, Taxon 65. 93. 2016. 15. Aubrieta alshehbazii Dönmez, Uǧurlu & M.A.Koch, Phytotaxa 299. 104. 2017. 16. Silene shehbazii S.A.Ahmad, Novon 25: 131. 2017. PUBLICATIONS OF IHSAN A. AL-SHEHBAZ 1973 1. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1973. The biosystematics of the genus Thelypodium (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 204: 3-148. 1977 2. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1977. Protogyny, Cruciferae. Syst. Bot. 2: 327-333. 3. A. R. Al-Mayah & I. A. Al-Shehbaz. 1977. Chromosome numbers for some Leguminosae from Iraq. Bot. Notiser 130: 437-440. 1978 4. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1978. Chromosome number reports, certain Cruciferae from Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Creek Checklist-Apr2012
    Checklist of Vascular Plants Shell Creek and Vicinity April 2012 Avenales Wildlife Area, Sinton Ranch, San Luis Obispo County, California PREPARED BY DAVID J. KEIL, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT, CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN LUIS OBISPO Scientific name1,2 Common name FAMILY Abronia pogonantha Desert sand-verbena NYCTAGINACEAE Achillea millefolium Yarrow ASTERACEAE Achyrachaena mollis Blow wives ASTERACEAE Acmispon americanus (Lotus purshianus) Spanish-clover FABACEAE Acmispon brachycarpus (Lotus humistratus) Foothill deervetch FABACEAE Acmispon glaber (Lotus scoparius) Deerweed FABACEAE Acmispon strigosus (Lotus strigosus) Strigose deervetch FABACEAE Acmispon wrangelianus California deervetch FABACEAE Acourtia microcephala Sacapelote ASTERACEAE Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise ROSACEAE Agoseris heterophylla Annual mountain dandelion ASTERACEAE *Amaranthus albus3 Tumble amaranth AMARANTHACEAE *Amaranthus retroflexus Redroot amaranth AMARANTHACEAE Ambrosia acanthicarpa Annual bursage ASTERACEAE Amsinckia menziesii subsp. intermedia Fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE Amsinckia tessellata subsp. gloriosa Fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE Amsinckia tessellata subsp. tessellata Fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE *Anagallis arvensis Scarlet pimpernel MYRSINACEAE Ancistrocarphus filagineus Woolly fishhooks ASTERACEAE Apiastrum angustifolium Apiastrum APIACEAE Arctostaphylos glauca Bigberry manzanita ERICACEAE Artemisia californica California sagebrush ASTERACEAE Artemisia douglasiana Mugwort ASTERACEAE Asclepias fascicularis Milkweed APOCYNACEAE Asclepias vestita
    [Show full text]
  • The First Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Boswellia Sacra, a Resin-Producing Plant in Oman
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The First Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Boswellia sacra, a Resin-Producing Plant in Oman Abdul Latif Khan1, Ahmed Al-Harrasi1*, Sajjad Asaf2, Chang Eon Park2, Gun-Seok Park2, Abdur Rahim Khan2, In-Jung Lee2, Ahmed Al-Rawahi1, Jae-Ho Shin2* 1 UoN Chair of Oman's Medicinal Plants & Marine Natural Products, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman, 2 School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea a1111111111 * [email protected] (AAH); [email protected] (JHS) a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 Boswellia sacra (Burseraceae), a keystone endemic species, is famous for the production of fragrant oleo-gum resin. However, the genetic make-up especially the genomic informa- tion about chloroplast is still unknown. Here, we described for the first time the chloroplast OPEN ACCESS (cp) genome of B. sacra. The complete cp sequence revealed a circular genome of 160,543 Citation: Khan AL, Al-Harrasi A, Asaf S, Park CE, bp size with 37.61% GC content. The cp genome is a typical quadripartite chloroplast struc- Park G-S, Khan AR, et al. (2017) The First ture with inverted repeats (IRs 26,763 bp) separated by small single copy (SSC; 18,962 bp) Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Boswellia sacra, and large single copy (LSC; 88,055 bp) regions. De novo assembly and annotation showed a Resin-Producing Plant in Oman. PLoS ONE 12 the presence of 114 unique genes with 83 protein-coding regions. The phylogenetic analysis (1): e0169794. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169794 revealed that the B. sacra cp genome is closely related to the cp genome of Azadirachta Editor: Xiu-Qing Li, Agriculture and Agri-Food indica and Citrus sinensis, while most of the syntenic differences were found in the non-cod- Canada, CANADA ing regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploid Apomicts of the Boechera Holboellii Complex Display Large-Scale Chromosome Substitutions and Aberrant Chromosomes
    Diploid apomicts of the Boechera holboellii complex display large-scale chromosome substitutions and aberrant chromosomes Laksana Kantama*†, Timothy F. Sharbel‡, M. Eric Schranz§, Thomas Mitchell-Olds¶, Sacco de Vries*, and Hans de Jongʈ** *Laboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, Dreijenlaan 3, NL-6703 HA, Wageningen, The Netherlands; ‡Apomixis Research Group, Department of Cytogenetics and Genome Analysis, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany; §Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 318, NL-1098 MS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; ¶Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; and ʈLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Arboretumlaan 4, NL-6703 BD, Wageningen, The Netherlands Communicated by Maarten Koornneef, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 15, 2007 (received for review May 20, 2007) We conducted a cytogenetic study of sexual lines of Boechera holboellii is polyphyletic. Its sequence and microsatellite analyses and seven diploid apomic- have shown that B. divaricarpa arose through hybridization (14 ؍ stricta and Boechera holboellii (2n tic accessions of their interspecific hybrid Boechera divaricarpa and between sexual B. stricta and B. holboellii or a closely related or 15). By studying chromosome morphology, species (3, 5, 6). The level of allelic variation is comparable 14 ؍ B. holboellii (2n rDNA repeats, genome painting, male meiosis, pollen morphology, between B. divaricarpa and B. holboellii, and a low number of and flow-cytometry seed screens, we revealed an unexpected species-specific alleles suggests that the hybrid originated re- plethora of chromosome forms, pairing behavior, and hybrid cently (6). Multiple evolutionary origins of triploidy in Boechera composition in all apomictic lines.
    [Show full text]