DOCSLIB.ORG

Clock Jitter Effects on the Performance of ADC Devices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clock Jitter Effects on the Performance of ADC Devices Clock Jitter Effects on the Performance of ADC Devices Roberto J. Vega Luis Geraldo P. Meloni Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP P.O. Box 05 - 13083-852 P.O. Box 05 - 13083-852 Campinas - SP - Brazil Campinas - SP - Brazil [email protected] [email protected] Karlo G. Lenzi Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Telecomunicac¸oes˜ - CPqD P.O. Box 05 - 13083-852 Campinas - SP - Brazil [email protected] Abstract— This paper aims to demonstrate the effect of jitter power near the full scale of the ADC, the noise power is on the performance of Analog-to-digital converters and how computed by all FFT bins except the DC bin value (it is it degrades the quality of the signal being sampled. If not common to exclude up to 8 bins after the DC zero-bin to carefully controlled, jitter effects on data acquisition may severely impacted the outcome of the sampling process. This analysis avoid any spectral leakage of the DC component). is of great importance for applications that demands a very This measure includes the effect of all types of noise, the good signal to noise ratio, such as high-performance wireless distortion and harmonics introduced by the converter. The rms standards, such as DTV, WiMAX and LTE. error is given by (1), as defined by IEEE standard [5], where Index Terms— ADC Performance, Jitter, Phase Noise, SNR. J is an exact integer multiple of fs=N: I. INTRODUCTION 1 s X = jX(k)j2 (1) With the advance of the technology and the migration of the rms N signal processing from analog to digital, the use of analog-to- k6=0;J;N−J digital converters (ADC) became essential. This conversion SINAD is the ratio between the rms level of the input is not free errors. These errors can have a major influence sinusoid and the rms, usually expressed in dBc. anufactures on overall system performance. In the previous paper [1], commonly plot SINAD as a function of frequency to shows it was found divergence between the simulations and the high frequency device degradation [2], since it represents the measurements of approximately about 2 dB, which were ADC overall performance (including all types of noise and attributed to the clock jitter, aperture time and electromagnetic distortions). interference effects present in the printed circuit board (PCB). This paper is an extension of [1], where it is shown theo- B. Total Harmonic Distortion - THD retical aspects, simulation and measurements of the sampling The total harmonic distortion is the ratio of the rms value clock. These performance metrics are very important when of the input sinusoid to the mean value of the first main har- one wants to assess the quality of and ADC device. The main monics produced by the analog-to-digital conversion. Practical goal of this paper is to offer a study of the effects of jitter in number of harmonics is 6 [2], although IEEE standard use ADC performance. other default value [5]. II. METRICS USED TO EVALUATE THE ADC Although the quantity of harmonics considered in the PERFORMANCE computation may change, the first and the second harmonic In this section, common measurements of analog-to-digital distortion will always be specified by manufactures, since they conversion performance are reviewed. These metrics are used tend to be the largest ones. This metric is relevant because it on experimental results with a commercial analog-to-digital measures the ADC nonlinearity intrinsic to the converter as converter on the next section. Other important measure is the well as external conditioning signal circuitry. For high-speed thermal noise salso simulated, although not presented here, it instrumentation and RF applications this is the most important may be found at [4]. figure of merit, since it includes out-of-band distortions. A. Signal to Noise Ratio plus Distortion - SINAD C. SNR due to quantization noise One of the most important ADC metrics is called SINAD - The Fig. 1 shows an illustration a uniform memoryless Signal-to-Noise Ratio plus Distortion. Using as input a sinus midrise quantization and illustrates deterministic nature of the p noise q. As the number of levels L of the ADC is large, a the pdf is also 2 [3], so the maximum SNR for a sine-wave good supposition is to consider the q power density function is given by: (pdf) as uniform inside an input step size δ: SNR (db) = 6:0206R + 1:7609 (10) 1 δ q P (q) = ; j q |≤ (2) p δ 2 Another important parameter for frequency analysis is called So, the minimum variance of the quantization error is: DFT noise floor. The DFT may also be considered a bank of matched filters, each filter defined by its basis function of Z δ=2 δ2 the DFT as band-pass filters and one low-pass DC filter. In σ2 = q2P (q); dq = (3) qmin p practical applications, the input signal is usually band-limited −δ=2 12 and sampled at higher frequency than Nyquist. And the minimum rms quantization error: In these situation it is possible to filter the noise outside the δ δ band of interest improving the SNR which is called processing σqmin = p = p (4) gain [2]. Processing techniques such as oversampling, quanti- 12 2 3 zation noise shaping and filtering are the basis of sigma-delta converters [2]. The filter selectivity of the DFT rises with the DFT size. Here we are using a coherent signal, a sine-wave, with the DFT basis functions. The DFT noise floor will be function of the DFT size, reducing with N much bellow the sinusoid power. For computing the processing gain, one can use a simple rule of three: if we consider all digital frequencies, all quan- 2 tization noise σq must be taken in computing the SNR up to fN , for a sinusoid coherent with a DFT band-pass filter B σ2 with bandwidth W , the noise will be qg , a small fraction of the overall noise. Therefore, rewriting (7) and redoing the calculations: 2 Bw σ = σ 2 qg q (11) min fN The processing gain can be expressed by replacing (3) and Fig. 1. Uniform quantization with 8 levels (L = 8) [1]. (4), defining (8): This is a white noise that spreads on the whole band up fN to the Nyquist frequency fN . The step size δ may also be SNRg = 6:0206R + 1:7609 + 10 log10 (12) Bw expressed by the number of levels L, i.e., ththe number of bits R of the ADC: Where fN = fs=2. One can consider the DFT band-pass bandwidth Bw = fs=N, , which increases as function of the 2x 2x δ = ol = ol (5) DFT size: L 2R Where xol = xmax is the maximum peak value of the input N SNR = 6:0206R + 1:7609 + 10 log (13) signal without overload. From (3), (4) and (5): g 10 2 2−2Rx2 Thus, to improve the noise floor by 3 dB, it is necessary σ2 = max (6) qmin 3 to double the DFT size. Considering a coherent-sampling, it xmax would also imply an oversampling effect of 2 times of the fl = (7) input signal. σx This ratio is called loading factor [2], where σx is the rms D. Effective Number of Bits - ENOB input value. From (4) and (5), gives the maximum SNR, as it There is no common definition for the effective number of is used the minimum variance of the quantization noise. bits (ENOB). Here, it is used the definition proposed by IEC [1], in which ENOB is directly computed from SINAD as σ2 σ2 22R x x follows: SNRq = = −2R 2 = (8) σ 2 2 x =3 fl=3 qmin max SINAD − 1:76 SNR (db) = 6:0206R − 10 log (f 2=3) (9) ENOB = (14) q 10 l 6:02 For ap sine-wave with peak value equalp to xol, the rms value This represents a practical limit of the ADC resolution due is xol= 2, so the loading factor is fl = 2. The factor fl for to inherent noise and linearity errors, and it aims to specify the number of effective bits of a digitalized signal above the noise This SNR due jitter must include the quantization noise floor, giving the ADC accuracy at a specific input frequency calculed by (9). The overall SNR achieved (SNRtotal) [4], and sampling rate. that includes both limitations can be expressed by: This equation is easily computed by substituting SINAD in (9) and solving it for R, assuming an input at full-scale. q ! SNRq SNRJ To compensate any attenuation on the input signal applied to − 10 − 10 SNRtotal(dB) = −20 log 10 + 10 protect it from clipping, the following normalization of the FS amplitude by the input amplitude should be used: (21) SINAD − 1:76 + 20log( F Samplitude ) F. Phase noise ENOB = Inputamplitude (15) 6:02 To measure jitter directly is very difficult because the E. Sampling error due to jitter fluctuation is small with respect to the sample. Unlike the jitter, the phase noise of the clock signal is easier to measure. The jitter is the time variation for each clock cycle. This A common spectrum analyzer can be used. variation is usually generated by thermal noise due electrical current. The sample time variations generate voltage errors as The phase noise of the clock signal is the phase modulation shown in Fig. 2. This variation is called aperture jitter [2] and due the time-domain instabilities (or jitter). From (16), the is usually measured in rms picoseconds.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Johnson Noise and Shot Noise: the Determination of the Boltzmann Constant, Absolute Zero Temperature and the Charge of the Electron
    Johnson Noise and Shot Noise: The Determination of the Boltzmann Constant, Absolute Zero Temperature and the Charge of the Electron MIT Department of Physics (Dated: September 3, 2013) In electronic measurements, one observes \signals," which must be distinctly above the \noise." Noise induced from outside sources may be reduced by shielding and proper \grounding." Less noise means greater sensitivity with signal/noise as the figure of merit. However, there exist fundamental sources of noise which no clever circuit can avoid. The intrinsic noise is a result of the thermal jitter of the charge carriers and the quantization of charge. The purpose of this experiment is to measure these two limiting electrical noises. From the measurements, values of the Boltzmann constant and the charge of the electron will be derived. PREPARATORY QUESTIONS By the end of the 19th century, the accumulated ev- idence from chemistry, crystallography, and the kinetic Please visit the Johnson and Shot Noise chapter on the theory of gases left little doubt about the validity of the 8.13x website at mitx.mit.edu to review the background atomic theory of matter. Nevertheless, there were still material for this experiment. Answer all questions found arguments against the atomic theory, stemming from a in the chapter. Work out the solutions in your laboratory lack of "direct" evidence for the reality of atoms. In fact, notebook; submit your answers on the web site. there was no precise measurement yet available of the quantitative relation between atoms and the objects of direct scientific experience such as weights, meter sticks, EXPERIMENT GOALS clocks, and ammeters.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Optimal Feedback Filters with Guaranteed Closed-Loop Stability for Oversampled Noise-Shaping Subband Quantizers
    49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2010 Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA Design of Optimal Feedback Filters with Guaranteed Closed-Loop Stability for Oversampled Noise-Shaping Subband Quantizers SanderWahls HolgerBoche. Abstract—We consider the oversampled noise-shaping sub- T T T T ] ] ] ] band quantizer (ONSQ) with the quantization noise being q q v q,q v q,q + Quant- + + + + modeled as white noise. The problem at hand is to design an q - q izer q q - q q ,...,w ,...,w optimal feedback filter. Optimal feedback filters with regard 1 1 ,...,v ,...,v to the current standard model of the ONSQ inhabit several + q,1 q,1 w=[w + w=[w =[v =[v shortcomings: the stability of the feedback loop is not ensured - q q v v and the noise is considered independent of both the input and u ŋ u ŋ -1 -1 the feedback filter. Another previously unknown disadvantage, q z F(z) q q z F(z) q which we prove in our paper, is that optimal feedback filters in the standard model are never unique. The goal of this paper is (a) Real model: η is the qnt. error (b) Linearized model: η is white noise to show how these shortcomings can be overcome. The stability issue is addressed by showing that every feedback filter can be Figure 1: Noise-Shaping Quantizer “stabilized” in the sense that we can find another feedback filter which stabilizes the feedback loop and achieves a performance w v E (z) p 1 q,1 p R (z) equal (or arbitrarily close) to the original filter.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Low Phase Noise Radiation-Pressure-Driven Optomechanical Oscillator Chipset
    OPEN An integrated low phase noise SUBJECT AREAS: radiation-pressure-driven OPTICS AND PHOTONICS NANOSCIENCE AND optomechanical oscillator chipset TECHNOLOGY Xingsheng Luan1, Yongjun Huang1,2, Ying Li1, James F. McMillan1, Jiangjun Zheng1, Shu-Wei Huang1, Pin-Chun Hsieh1, Tingyi Gu1, Di Wang1, Archita Hati3, David A. Howe3, Guangjun Wen2, Mingbin Yu4, Received Guoqiang Lo4, Dim-Lee Kwong4 & Chee Wei Wong1 26 June 2014 Accepted 1Optical Nanostructures Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA, 2Key Laboratory of Broadband Optical 13 October 2014 Fiber Transmission & Communication Networks, School of Communication and Information Engineering, University of Electronic 3 Published Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 4 30 October 2014 80303, USA, The Institute of Microelectronics, 11 Science Park Road, Singapore 117685, Singapore. High-quality frequency references are the cornerstones in position, navigation and timing applications of Correspondence and both scientific and commercial domains. Optomechanical oscillators, with direct coupling to requests for materials continuous-wave light and non-material-limited f 3 Q product, are long regarded as a potential platform for should be addressed to frequency reference in radio-frequency-photonic architectures. However, one major challenge is the compatibility with standard CMOS fabrication processes while maintaining optomechanical high quality X.L. (xl2354@ performance. Here we demonstrate the monolithic integration of photonic crystal optomechanical columbia.edu); Y.H. oscillators and on-chip high speed Ge detectors based on the silicon CMOS platform. With the generation of (yh2663@columbia. both high harmonics (up to 59th order) and subharmonics (down to 1/4), our chipset provides multiple edu) or C.W.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Jitter and Wander Measurements and Standards Second Edition Contents
    Understanding Jitter and Wander Measurements and Standards Second Edition Contents Page Preface 1. Introduction to Jitter and Wander 1-1 2. Jitter Standards and Applications 2-1 3. Jitter Testing in the Optical Transport Network 3-1 (OTN) 4. Jitter Tolerance Measurements 4-1 5. Jitter Transfer Measurement 5-1 6. Accurate Measurement of Jitter Generation 6-1 7. How Tester Intrinsics and Transients 7-1 affect your Jitter Measurement 8. What 0.172 Doesn’t Tell You 8-1 9. Measuring 100 mUIp-p Jitter Generation with an 0.172 Tester? 9-1 10. Faster Jitter Testing with Simultaneous Filters 10-1 11. Verifying Jitter Generator Performance 11-1 12. An Overview of Wander Measurements 12-1 Acronyms Welcome to the second edition of Agilent Technologies Understanding Jitter and Wander Measurements and Standards booklet, the distillation of over 20 years’ experience and know-how in the field of telecommunications jitter testing. The Telecommunications Networks Test Division of Agilent Technologies (formerly Hewlett-Packard) in Scotland introduced the first jitter measurement instrument in 1982 for PDH rates up to E3 and DS3, followed by one of the first 140 Mb/s jitter testers in 1984. SONET/SDH jitter test capability followed in the 1990s, and recently Agilent introduced one of the first 10 Gb/s Optical Channel jitter test sets for measurements on the new ITU-T G.709 frame structure. Over the years, Agilent has been a significant participant in the development of jitter industry standards, with many contributions to ITU-T O.172/O.173, the standards for jitter test equipment, and Telcordia GR-253/ ITU-T G.783, the standards for operational SONET/SDH network equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • ESE 531: Digital Signal Processing
    ESE 531: Digital Signal Processing Lec 12: February 21st, 2017 Data Converters, Noise Shaping (con’t) Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna Lecture Outline ! Data Converters " Anti-aliasing " ADC " Quantization " Practical DAC ! Noise Shaping Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 2 ADC Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 3 Anti-Aliasing Filter with ADC Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 4 Oversampled ADC Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 5 Oversampled ADC Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 6 Oversampled ADC Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 7 Oversampled ADC Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 8 Sampling and Quantization Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 9 Sampling and Quantization Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 10 Effect of Quantization Error on Signal ! Quantization error is a deterministic function of the signal " Consequently, the effect of quantization strongly depends on the signal itself ! Unless, we consider fairly trivial signals, a deterministic analysis is usually impractical " More common to look at errors from a statistical perspective " "Quantization noise” ! Two aspects " How much noise power (variance) does quantization add to our samples? " How is this noise distributed in frequency? Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 11 Quantization Error ! Model quantization error as noise ! In that case: Penn ESE 531 Spring 2017 - Khanna 12 Ideal Quantizer ! Quantization step Δ ! Quantization error has sawtooth shape, ! Bounded by –Δ/2, +Δ/2 ! Ideally infinite input range and infinite number of quantization levels Penn ESE 568 Fall 2016 - Khanna adapted from Murmann EE315B, Stanford 13 Ideal B-bit Quantizer ! Practical quantizers have a limited input range and a finite set of output codes ! E.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Design of Wideband LC Vcos
    Analysis and Design of Wideband LC VCOs Axel Dominique Berny Robert G. Meyer Ali Niknejad Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2006-50 http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2006/EECS-2006-50.html May 12, 2006 Copyright © 2006, by the author(s). All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission. Analysis and Design of Wideband LC VCOs by Axel Dominique Berny B.S. (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) 2000 M.S. (University of California, Berkeley) 2002 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Robert G. Meyer, Co-chair Professor Ali M. Niknejad, Co-chair Professor Philip B. Stark Spring 2006 Analysis and Design of Wideband LC VCOs Copyright 2006 by Axel Dominique Berny 1 Abstract Analysis and Design of Wideband LC VCOs by Axel Dominique Berny Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley Professor Robert G. Meyer, Co-chair Professor Ali M. Niknejad, Co-chair The growing demand for higher data transfer rates and lower power consumption has had a major impact on the design of RF communication systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling the Impact of Phase Noise on the Performance of Crystal-Free Radios Osama Khan, Brad Wheeler, Filip Maksimovic, David Burnett, Ali M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS—II: EXPRESS BRIEFS, VOL. 64, NO. 7, JULY 2017 777 Modeling the Impact of Phase Noise on the Performance of Crystal-Free Radios Osama Khan, Brad Wheeler, Filip Maksimovic, David Burnett, Ali M. Niknejad, and Kris Pister Abstract—We propose a crystal-free radio receiver exploiting a free-running oscillator as a local oscillator (LO) while simulta- neously satisfying the 1% packet error rate (PER) specification of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard. This results in significant power savings for wireless communication in millimeter-scale microsys- tems targeting Internet of Things applications. A discrete time simulation method is presented that accurately captures the phase noise (PN) of a free-running oscillator used as an LO in a crystal- free radio receiver. This model is then used to quantify the impact of LO PN on the communication system performance of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard compliant receiver. It is found that the equiv- alent signal-to-noise ratio is limited to ∼8 dB for a 75-µW ring oscillator PN profile and to ∼10 dB for a 240-µW LC oscillator PN profile in an AWGN channel satisfying the standard’s 1% PER specification. Index Terms—Crystal-free radio, discrete time phase noise Fig. 1. Typical PN plot of an RF oscillator locked to a stable crystal frequency modeling, free-running oscillators, IEEE 802.15.4, incoherent reference. matched filter, Internet of Things (IoT), low-power radio, min- imum shift keying (MSK) modulation, O-QPSK modulation, power law noise, quartz crystal (XTAL), wireless communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrospective Analysis of Phonatory Outcomes After CO2 Laser Thyroarytenoid 00111 Myoneurectomy in Patients with Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia
    Global Journal of Otolaryngology ISSN 2474-7556 Research Article Glob J Otolaryngol Volume 22 Issue 4- June 2020 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Rohan Bidaye DOI: 10.19080/GJO.2020.22.556091 Retrospective Analysis of Phonatory Outcomes after CO2 Laser Thyroarytenoid Myoneurectomy in Patients with Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia Rohan Bidaye1*, Sachin Gandhi2*, Aishwarya M3 and Vrushali Desai4 1Senior Clinical Fellow in Laryngology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, India 2Head of Department of ENT, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, India 3Fellow in Laryngology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, India 4Chief Consultant, Speech Language Pathologist, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, India Submission: May 16, 2020; Published: June 08, 2020 *Corresponding author: Rohan Bidaye and Sachin Gandhi, Senior Clinical Fellow in Laryngology and Head of Department of ENT, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, India Abstract Introduction: Adductor spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD) is a focal laryngeal dystonia characterized by spasms of laryngeal muscles during speech. Botulinum toxin injection in the Thyroarytenoid muscle remains the gold-standard treatment for ADSD. However, as Botulinum toxin CO2 laser Thyroarytenoid myoneurectomy (TAM) has been reported as an effective technique for treatment of ADSD. It provides sustained improvementinjections need in tothe be voice repeated over a periodically,longer duration. the voice quality fluctuates over a longer period. A Microlaryngoscopic Transoral approach to Methods: Trans oral Microlaryngoscopic CO2 laser TAM was performed in 14 patients (5 females and 9 males), aged between 19 and 64 years who were diagnosed with ADSD. Data was collected from over 3 years starting from Jan 2014 – Dec 2016. GRBAS scale along with Multi- dimensional voice programme (MDVP) analysis of the voice and Video laryngo-stroboscopic (VLS) samples at the end of 3 and 12 months of surgery would be compared with the pre-operative readings.
    [Show full text]
  • All You Need to Know About SINAD Measurements Using the 2023
    applicationapplication notenote All you need to know about SINAD and its measurement using 2023 signal generators The 2023A, 2023B and 2025 can be supplied with an optional SINAD measuring capability. This article explains what SINAD measurements are, when they are used and how the SINAD option on 2023A, 2023B and 2025 performs this important task. www.ifrsys.com SINAD and its measurements using the 2023 What is SINAD? C-MESSAGE filter used in North America SINAD is a parameter which provides a quantitative Psophometric filter specified in ITU-T Recommendation measurement of the quality of an audio signal from a O.41, more commonly known from its original description as a communication device. For the purpose of this article the CCITT filter (also often referred to as a P53 filter) device is a radio receiver. The definition of SINAD is very simple A third type of filter is also sometimes used which is - its the ratio of the total signal power level (wanted Signal + unweighted (i.e. flat) over a broader bandwidth. Noise + Distortion or SND) to unwanted signal power (Noise + The telephony filter responses are tabulated in Figure 2. The Distortion or ND). It follows that the higher the figure the better differences in frequency response result in different SINAD the quality of the audio signal. The ratio is expressed as a values for the same signal. The C-MES signal uses a reference logarithmic value (in dB) from the formulae 10Log (SND/ND). frequency of 1 kHz while the CCITT filter uses a reference of Remember that this a power ratio, not a voltage ratio, so a 800 Hz, which results in the filter having "gain" at 1 kHz.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Phase Error and Jitter: Definitions, Implications
    This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS–I: REGULAR PAPERS 1 Understanding Phase Error and Jitter: Definitions, Implications, Simulations, and Measurement Ian Galton , Fellow, IEEE, and Colin Weltin-Wu, Member, IEEE (Invited Paper) Abstract— Precision oscillators are ubiquitous in modern elec- multiplication by a sinusoidal oscillator signal whereas most tronic systems, and their accuracy often limits the performance practical mixer circuits perform multiplication by squared-up of such systems. Hence, a deep understanding of how oscillator oscillator signals. Fundamental questions typically are left performance is quantified, simulated, and measured, and how unanswered such as: How does the squaring-up process change it affects the system performance is essential for designers. the oscillator error? How does multiplying by a squared-up Unfortunately, the necessary information is spread thinly across oscillator signal instead of a sinusoidal signal change a mixer’s the published literature and textbooks with widely varying notations and some critical disconnects. This paper addresses this behavior and response to oscillator error? problem by presenting a comprehensive one-stop explanation of Another obstacle to learning the material is that there are how oscillator error is quantified, simulated, and measured in three distinct oscillator error metrics in common use: phase practice, and the effects of oscillator error in typical oscillator error, jitter, and frequency stability. Each metric offers advan- applications. tages in certain applications, so it is important to understand Index Terms— Oscillator phase error, phase noise, jitter, how they relate to each other, yet with the exception of [1], frequency stability, Allan variance, frequency synthesizer, crystal, the authors are not aware of prior publications that provide phase-locked loop (PLL).
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
    Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies Volume 235 Series Editors Robert J. Howlett, Bournemouth University and KES International, Shoreham-by-Sea, UK Lakhmi C. Jain, KES International, Shoreham-by-Sea, UK The Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series encompasses the topics of knowledge, intelligence, innovation and sustainability. The aim of the series is to make available a platform for the publication of books on all aspects of single and multi-disciplinary research on these themes in order to make the latest results available in a readily-accessible form. Volumes on interdisciplinary research combining two or more of these areas is particularly sought. The series covers systems and paradigms that employ knowledge and intelligence in a broad sense. Its scope is systems having embedded knowledge and intelligence, which may be applied to the solution of world problems in industry, the environment and the community. It also focusses on the knowledge-transfer methodologies and innovation strategies employed to make this happen effectively. The combination of intelligent systems tools and a broad range of applications introduces a need for a synergy of disciplines from science, technology, business and the humanities. The series will include conference proceedings, edited collections, monographs, hand- books, reference books, and other relevant types of book in areas of science and technology where smart systems and technologies can offer innovative solutions. High quality content is an essential feature for all book proposals accepted for the series. It is expected that editors of all accepted volumes will ensure that contributions are subjected to an appropriate level of reviewing process and adhere to KES quality principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Receiver Sensitivity and Equivalent Noise Bandwidth Receiver Sensitivity and Equivalent Noise Bandwidth
    11/08/2016 Receiver Sensitivity and Equivalent Noise Bandwidth Receiver Sensitivity and Equivalent Noise Bandwidth Parent Category: 2014 HFE By Dennis Layne Introduction Receivers often contain narrow bandpass hardware filters as well as narrow lowpass filters implemented in digital signal processing (DSP). The equivalent noise bandwidth (ENBW) is a way to understand the noise floor that is present in these filters. To predict the sensitivity of a receiver design it is critical to understand noise including ENBW. This paper will cover each of the building block characteristics used to calculate receiver sensitivity and then put them together to make the calculation. Receiver Sensitivity Receiver sensitivity is a measure of the ability of a receiver to demodulate and get information from a weak signal. We quantify sensitivity as the lowest signal power level from which we can get useful information. In an Analog FM system the standard figure of merit for usable information is SINAD, a ratio of demodulated audio signal to noise. In digital systems receive signal quality is measured by calculating the ratio of bits received that are wrong to the total number of bits received. This is called Bit Error Rate (BER). Most Land Mobile radio systems use one of these figures of merit to quantify sensitivity. To measure sensitivity, we apply a desired signal and reduce the signal power until the quality threshold is met. SINAD SINAD is a term used for the Signal to Noise and Distortion ratio and is a type of audio signal to noise ratio. In an analog FM system, demodulated audio signal to noise ratio is an indication of RF signal quality.
    [Show full text]