DOCSLIB.ORG

The Reception History of Palaephatus 1 (On the Centaurs) in Ancient and Byzantine Texts*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Reception History of Palaephatus 1 (On the Centaurs) in Ancient and Byzantine Texts* The reception history of Palaephatus 1 (On the Centaurs) in Ancient and Byzantine texts* MINERVA ALGANZA ROLDÁN Universidad de Granada [email protected] JULIAN BARR [email protected] GRETA HAWES Australian National University [email protected] * This article is part of the Research Project ‘Estudios sobre transmisión y recepción de Paléfato y la exégesis racionalista de los mitos / Studies on the transmission and reception of Palaephatus, and the rationalist exegesis of myths’ (FFI2014-52203-P), supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) of Spain. The sections on ancient texts (2, 3, and 4) are primarily the work of Julian Barr and Greta Hawes. The sections on Byzantine texts (5, 6, and 7) are primarily the work of Minerva Alganza Roldán, and were translated into English by Greta Hawes. Polymnia - n°3 - 2017 THE RECEPTION HISTORY OF PALAEPHATUS 1 (ON THE CENTAURS) 187 1. Introduction The transmission history of Palaephatus’ Peri Apiston remains a topic of dispute. The text that we have comprises a methodological introduction along with 46 examples of the rationalisation of individual myths.1 The best evidence that we have points to Palaephatus as working in Athens in the late fourth century BC, within the ambit of the Peripatetics. But almost nothing can be said with certainty about the early history of his Peri Apiston.2 Palaephatus’ name – in the context of a far-fetched explanation utilising a protos heuretes motif – appears in a fragment of new comedy (Athenion fr.1 PCG).3 His Troica is mentioned – approvingly – by Strabo (12.3.22) as a source used by Demetrius of Scepsis (early second century BC).4 But only in the late first century AD, in a passage in the Progymnasmata of Aelius Theon (discussed below), is Palaephatus named as author of the Peri Apiston. When Festa published the text in 1902, he used a double critical apparatus to reflect both the complicated textual transmission of Palaephatus’ work, and his hypothesis that the manuscripts preserved an eleventh-century compendium of the five-book original. Our extant text, in his view, preserved genuine Palaephatean passages alongside other material corrupted by its use in rhetorical instruction. Although Festa’s text has not been subject to revision since, his ideas regarding the state of the text have received some critical re-evaluation. Wipprecht (1892) and Schraeder (1894) argued against Festa’s hypothesis that this was a later composite compilation, and more recently translators have insisted that the form and content of the prologue and longer entries are original.5 Further, while Festa and his predecessors focussed on identifying the author and establishing the authenticity of the work, recent studies have shifted the focus to examining its exegetical features, its philosophical context, and its relationship to rhetoric.6 1 Five further – non rationalistic – entries found in some manuscripts are certainly interpolations and should not be included in discussions of Palaephatus and the Palaephatean tradition. 2 For recent discussions of the ancient reception of the Peri Apiston, see Santoni 2000: 10; Santoni 2002: 146–47; Alganza Roldán 2012: 40–46; Hawes 2014a: 229–233. 3 Athenion cannot be dated, not least because only this one fragment of his work survives. In PCG he is assigned tentatively to the first century BC. 4 For discussion of the content of Palaephatus’ Troica and its relationship to other accounts of the Troad from antiquity, see Trachsel 2007. 5 E.g. Roquet 1974, Stern 1996, and Santoni 2000. 6 See e.g. Santoni 2002; Hawes 2014a. There is a useful synopsis in Zucker 2016: 43–46. 188 MINERVA ALGANZA ROLDAN – JULIAN BARR – GRETA HAWES In this article, we look in detail at the reception history of Palaephatus’ treatment of the Centaurs in the first entry of the Peri Apiston.7 We trace its influence through textual passages from antiquity, late antiquity, and the Byzantine period. This is of course merely one illustration of the reception history of the text amongst many possible ones, but it does have predictive value as a paradigm for the later fortunes of the text. Palaephatus’ rationalisation of the Centaurs is one of the most recognisable aspects of his text; it thus has a rich reception tradition, and a distinctive status as a prominent archetype of Palaephatus’ interpretative project. The reception history of a passage of text offers much beyond information about the transmission of that text. In some instances we are indeed able to comment on whether a particular author might have had direct access to Palaephatus’ text, or whether the material came to him by way of an intermediary source. But, even where such issues are not clear, we can explore how ideas which derive ultimately from Palaephatus developed by considering how each author made use of ‘Palaephatean’ material and how each functioned within each new context. In broadening the scope of the study of the ‘afterlife’ of the Peri Apiston in this way, we are taking up the challenge articulated by David Bouvier: la question est plutôt de savoir comment les notices du PA ont été regroupées, pourquoi elles ont été placées sous un nom particulier, comment elles ont été élaborées, dans quel contexte. Postuler que ces notices relèvent d’un auteur particulier revient à discréditer d’emblée l’intérêt d’un manuel qui révèle autre chose qu’une pensée et une position intellectuelle individuelle. Mais le XXe siècle n’était pas prêt à reconnaître ce point.8 Indeed, the twenty-first century, with its more sophisticated understanding of the pervasive influences and amorphous forms taken by mythographic knowledge through time, requires a new perspective on the Palaephatean tradition. In distancing ourselves from the focus on recovering the Palaephatean original (an impossibility, in any case, according to Festa), we emphasise the desirability of understanding Palaephatus’ value as a 7 Of the manuscripts studied by Vitelli 1893, all have the entry on the Centaurs as their first entry except those he identifies as ‘group E’. To the eight manuscripts classified in this group by the Italian scholar, two new ones must now be added: EBE 799 (fourteenth century) and ȧɍɋɛ ȤȾɛɏɘɋ 1317 (mid-eighteenth century), which begin with the entries on Actaeon and Pasiphae respectively. 8 Bouvier 2015: 39. THE RECEPTION HISTORY OF PALAEPHATUS 1 (ON THE CENTAURS) 189 product of mythographic activity developed through generations of writers, readers, and thinkers. 2. On the Centaurs: Palaephatus’ rationalisation For the text and translation of Palaephatus 1, see Appendix. Palaephatus’ entry on the Centaurs is notable for its length and detail. It deploys the full ‘Palaephatean structure’, a pattern of narration, refutation, correction, and resolution characteristic of this treatise.9 The entry begins by narrating the most pertinent ‘fact’ of the Centaurs, namely their hybrid form. Its refutation of them focuses on this aspect, too: such a creature could not eat food that would satisfy both its human and its equine stomachs, and whatever does not exist in the present did not exist in the past either. These arguments from biological possibility and historical consistency are among the most prominent in the treatise. They are paradigms for its ‘scientific’ rationale for why myths should not be believed.10 Against the language of ‘belief’ (ɎɂɜɅɂɒȽɇ) and ‘impossibility’ (ਕɁɠɋȽɒɍɋ), Palaephatus then offers the surety of ‘truth’ (ɒઁ Ɂ੻ ਕɉɄɅɚɑ). His rationalisation corrects the conventional myth narrative, and resolves it by explaining its origins in misunderstandings of rather more banal events. Palaephatus’ rationalisation takes the form of a long narrative account: Thessaly is suffering an incursion of wild bulls from Pelion so King Ixion promises a reward for their defeat. Youths from the foothills win this by inventing horse-riding and killing the bulls with their javelins. After their victory, however, these young men become arrogant and take to harassing Ixion and ravaging the countryside, even abducting Lapith women. Whereas Palaephatus had reduced the myth of the Centaurs to the simple fact of their hybridity in his introduction, his historicised narrative resolves four mythic ‘problems’ in turn: apart from their hybridity, he addresses also their birth, the meaning of their name, and their battle with the Lapiths. The Centaurs are ‘of Ixion and out of a cloud / Nephele’ not because they were born from such a coupling, but because they were employed by the former, and hail from a town called Nephele (the ambivalence of the 9 For details of the Palaephatean structure and its functions, see Delattre 2013: 70–73; Hawes 2014a: 48–52, 71–72; Hawes 2014b. 10 Although such arguments underpin the assumptions of the Peri Apiston, they are very seldom stated explicitly in the entries. Arguments regarding biological possibility appear in entries 2 (the Minotaur), 4 (Sphinx), 24 (Geryon), and 28 (Chimaera); arguments for the historical continuity of species appear also in the Preface, and in entries 28 (Pegasus) and 32 (the Amazons). 190 MINERVA ALGANZA ROLDAN – JULIAN BARR – GRETA HAWES preposition in the phrase ਥɈ ȨɂɔɚɉɄɑ cannot be adequately rendered in English). Their name is traced to their skill in using javelins to ‘pierce bulls’ (ɒɍઃɑ ɒȽɠɏɍɓɑ ɈȽɒɂɈɂɋɒəɋɋɓɐȽɋ). Their battle with the Lapiths is the result of a situation of mounting hostility. Finally, we get an explanation for their hybridity: this is a visual illusion since a rider at a distance might indeed seem to an unsophisticated bystander to be fused to his mount. These rationalisations show typical features of Palaephatus’ approach. The final explanation makes use of the ‘misunderstood sight’ motif; the first two, by contrast, rely on misunderstandings of ambiguous language. As so often, Palaephatus ends by reporting a first-person description of the ‘actual’ event which forms the basis for a mythical re-imagining of the situation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Athenians and Eleusinians in the West Pediment of the Parthenon
    ATHENIANS AND ELEUSINIANS IN THE WEST PEDIMENT OF THE PARTHENON (PLATE 95) T HE IDENTIFICATION of the figuresin the west pedimentof the Parthenonhas long been problematic.I The evidencereadily enables us to reconstructthe composition of the pedimentand to identify its central figures.The subsidiaryfigures, however, are rath- er more difficult to interpret. I propose that those on the left side of the pediment may be identifiedas membersof the Athenian royal family, associatedwith the goddessAthena, and those on the right as membersof the Eleusinian royal family, associatedwith the god Posei- don. This alignment reflects the strife of the two gods on a heroic level, by referringto the legendary war between Athens and Eleusis. The recognition of the disjunctionbetween Athenians and Eleusinians and of parallelism and contrastbetween individualsand groups of figures on the pedimentpermits the identificationof each figure. The referenceto Eleusis in the pediment,moreover, indicates the importanceof that city and its majorcult, the Eleu- sinian Mysteries, to the Athenians. The referencereflects the developmentand exploitation of Athenian control of the Mysteries during the Archaic and Classical periods. This new proposalfor the identificationof the subsidiaryfigures of the west pedimentthus has critical I This article has its origins in a paper I wrote in a graduateseminar directedby ProfessorJohn Pollini at The Johns Hopkins University in 1979. I returned to this paper to revise and expand its ideas during 1986/1987, when I held the Jacob Hirsch Fellowship at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. In the summer of 1988, I was given a grant by the Committeeon Research of Tulane University to conduct furtherresearch for the article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linguistic Case for the Aiolian Migration 433
    HESPERIA JJ (2OO8) THE LINGUISTIC Pages43I~4^4 CASE FOR THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION RECONSIDERED ABSTRACT Ascribingthe presence of speakers of Lesbian in thenortheast Aegean dur- inghistorical times to themigration of Aiolian tribes from mainland Greece receivesno supportfrom linguistics. Migration is notthe only or even primary wayin whichlanguages and dialectsmay spread. Moreover, on reexamina- tion,the idea of an Aiolicdialect group falls apart. Boiotian, separated by the FirstCompensatory Lengthening from Lesbian and Thessalian, appears as a conservativedialect, most closely related to WestGreek. In turn,Lesbian andThessalian are both archaic branches of Greek that share no demonstrable commoninnovations. They are bestviewed as twoseparate relic areas of a relativelyunaltered early Greek. - To pass fromthis legendary world an aggregateof streamsdis- tinctand heterogeneous,which do notwillingly come intoconflu- ence,and cannotbe forcedto intermix- intothe vision afforded by Herodotus,we learnfrom him that in the500s B.C.the whole coast-regionfrom Dardanus southward to thepromontory of Lektum(including the town of Ilium),and fromLektum eastward to Adramyttium,had been Aeolised,or was occupiedby Aeolic - Greeks likewisethe inland towns of Skepsisand Kebren.1 This papergrew out of the researchof BrianRose, as set out in the pre- cedingarticle in thisissue of Hesperia?As head of the post-BronzeAge excavationsat Troy,Rose had long acceptedthe scholarlyconsensus in 1. Grote 1888, vol. 1, p. 305, refer- mightexpect fromthe rulesbut does markany (or an unknown) representa- = ringto Hdt. 1.149-151. not occur.The sign > means "develops tive of that class. So C any consonant; = - 2. Rose 2008. My thanksare due to to" (and the sign < means "develops H any laryngeal;Kw any labiovelar; = = Brian Rose, Don Ringe, Ronald Kim, from")an earlierform by regularsound P any labial; R any resonant(I, r, and the anonymousreviewers for Hes- changes.The sign -> means "is replaced myn); T= any dental; V= anyvowel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Anthology
    BOOK TI CHRISTODORUS OF THEBES IN EGYPT This description of the bronze statues in the celebrated gymnasium called Zeuxippos, erected under Septimius Severus at Byzantium and destroyed by fire shortly after this was written (in 532 a.d. ), is of some value, as it gives at least a list of the statues and the names assigned to them. But owing to its bombastic style its value is of the slightest. The poet confines himself usually to mere rhetoric and tiresomely repeats his impression that the statues looked as if they were alive. B XPI^TOAHPOT nOIHTOT 0HBAIOY KOnTITOY ''EKCppaais Twv ayaXudrwu rwv (Is to hi]ix6<riov yv/nvaffiov rod iiriKaXovfxevov Zev^imrov. A7]i(j)o/3o(; fiev Trpwro? ivyXuTTTO) eirl ISco/jLO) laTaro, roX/x^jet?, K€/copvO/jLevo<;, 6/3pifio<i ijpco^, Toto? 6a)v, ol6<; irep eTTopwixevw ^leveXdcp TrepOofievcov y^vrrjaev ecov irpoirdpoiOe fieXdOpcov. Xcrraro he irpo^L^wvTL Traz^et/ceXo?' ev 3' eVt Koafi^o h6)(fjiL0'^ Tjv, jJLavir] he KeKucfiora vcora avveXKcov hpifjbv p.evo<; ^vvdyecpev eXiacre Be <peyyo<; OTrojTrr}?, old T€ hvajxevewv yijzpoirwv 7re(f)vXay/jL€vo<; opfiijv. Xatfj fjLev crd/co^; eupv 7rpota')(eTO, Se^crepfj he (^ayavov vy\r6a^ deipev e/xeXXe he piaLvopLevi] %e</5 dvepo<^ dvTLJSioLo Kara %poo9 dop eXdaaar aXV ov ')(^aXKov eOrjKe cpvai^i fretOi^jJiova Xvaarj, K.eKpo7rLhr]<; h' jjaTpairre, voyj/xovo^ dvOefia TleiOov Al(T')(LV7]^' Xaah]<; he crvveipve kvkXu 7rapetrj<;, ola 7roXvTpo)(^dXoLaiv deOXevcov dyopfjaiv (TTeivero yap irvKivfjai fjieXi^hoaiv. dyx^ ^ eKeivov yev 'ApiCTTOTeXiji;, ao(f)Lrj^ 7rp6fxo<^' IcTTd/jLevo^; he X^'^P^ TTepiTrXeyhrjv avveepyaOev, ouh^ evl p^aX^oi dcpOoyyo) ^peva^ el^j^v depyea<;, dXX' en ^ovXrjv 58 BOOK II CHRISTODORUS OF THEBES IN EGYPT Description of the Statues in the public gymnasium calle<l Zeuxippos.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Miracles: Automata in Ancient Greek Religion
    Mechanical Miracles: Automata in Ancient Greek Religion Tatiana Bur A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy Faculty of Arts, University of Sydney Supervisor: Professor Eric Csapo March, 2016 Statement of Originality This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. Tatiana Bur, March 2016. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................... 1 A NOTE TO THE READER ................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 PART I: THINKING ABOUT AUTOMATION .......................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1/ ELIMINATING THE BLOCAGE: ANCIENT AUTOMATA IN MODERN SCHOLARSHIP ................. 10 CHAPTER 2/ INVENTING AUTOMATION: AUTOMATA IN THE ANCIENT GREEK IMAGINATION ................. 24 PART II: AUTOMATA IN CONTEXT ................................................................................... 59 CHAPTER 3/ PROCESSIONAL AUTOMATA ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mythology Study Questions
    Greek Mythology version 1.0 Notes: These are study questions on Apollodorus’ Library of Greek Mythology. They are best used during or after reading the Library, though many of them can be used independently. In some cases Apollodorus departs from other NJCL sources, and those other sources are more authoritative/likely to come up on tests and in Certamen. In particular, it is wise to read the epics (Iliad, Odyssey, Aeneid, Metamorphoses) for the canonical versions of several stories. Most of these are in question form, and suitable for use as certamen questions, but many of the later questions are in the format of NJCL test questions instead. Students should not be worried by the number of questions here, or the esoteric nature of some of them. Mastering every one of these questions is unnecessary except, perhaps, for those aiming to get a top score on the NJCL Mythology Exam, compete at the highest levels of Certamen, and the like. Further, many of the questions here are part of longer stories; learning a story will often help a student answer several of the questions at once. Apollodorus does an excellent job of presenting stories succinctly and clearly. The best translation of the Library currently available is probably the Oxford Word Classics edition by Robin Hard. That edition is also excellent for its notes, which include crucial information that Apollodorus omits as well as comparisons with other versions of the stories. I am grateful for any corrections, comments, or suggestions. You can contact me at [email protected]. New versions of this list will be posted occasionally.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeus Temple at Olympia ROSS HOLLOWAY, R
    Panhellenism in the Sculptures of the Zeus Temple at Olympia ROSS HOLLOWAY, R. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1967; 8, 2; ProQuest pg. 93 Panhellenism in the Sculptures of the Zeus Temple at Olympia R. Ross Holloway REEK ARCHITECTURAL SCULPTURE in stone is as old as the Greek G stone temple. By the early fifth century B.C. the Greeks had also developed the idea of programmatic design in archi­ tectural sculpture. The thematic connections were simple and concrete. The metopes ofthe Athenian Treasury at Delphi, for example, present the comparison of the labors of Herakles and of Theseus. At Aigina the program occupying the pediments of the Aphaia Temple consisted of scenes from the two Greek expeditions against Troy. A century later, however, thematic planning of architectural sculp­ ture had moved far beyond such simple and obvious programs and could be conceived with connections that were more suggestive and abstract than declarative and concrete. A case in point is the Nereid Monument at Xanthos in Lycia, a princely tomb designed by a Greek architect and decorated by Greek artists at the beginning of the fourth century B.C. As interpreted by Panofsky,l the frieze of the podium combines scenes from the career of the owner of the tomb with mythical scenes meant to reflect that career on an heroic plane. In the colonnade celestial abstractions suggest a benevolent atmosphere. A final motive of apotheosis is expressed by figures of the Dioskouroi in the pediments. The century between the Aphaia Temple and the Nereid Monu­ ment saw the design and execution of the monumental architectural sculpture of the high classical age.
    [Show full text]
  • The Argei: Sex, War, and Crucifixion in Rome
    THE ARGEI: SEX, WAR, AND CRUCIFIXION IN ROME AND THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Kristan Foust Ewin, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: Christopher J. Fuhrmann, Major Professor Ken Johnson, Committee Member Walt Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Ewin, Kristan Foust. The Argei: Sex, War, and Crucifixion in Rome and the Ancient Near East. Master of Arts (History), May 2012, 119 pp., 2 tables, 18 illustrations, bibliography, 150 titles. The purpose of the Roman Argei ceremony, during which the Vestal Virgins harvested made and paraded rush puppets only to throw them into the Tiber, is widely debated. Modern historians supply three main reasons for the purpose of the Argei: an agrarian act, a scapegoat, and finally as an offering averting deceased spirits or Lares. I suggest that the ceremony also related to war and the spectacle of displaying war casualties. I compare the ancient Near East and Rome and connect the element of war and husbandry and claim that the Argei paralleled the sacred marriage. In addition to an agricultural and purification rite, these rituals may have served as sympathetic magic for pre- and inter-war periods. As of yet, no author has proposed the Argei as a ceremony related to war. By looking at the Argei holistically I open the door for a new direction of inquiry on the Argei ceremony, fertility cults in the Near East and in Rome, and on the execution of war criminals.
    [Show full text]
  • Deviant Origins: Hesiodic Theogony and the Orphica Radcliffe .G Edmonds III Bryn Mawr College, [email protected]
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Greek, Latin, and Classical Studies Faculty Research Greek, Latin, and Classical Studies and Scholarship 2018 Deviant Origins: Hesiodic Theogony and the Orphica Radcliffe .G Edmonds III Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/classics_pubs Part of the Classics Commons Custom Citation Edmonds, Radcliffe .G 2018. "Deviant Origins: Hesiodic Theogony and the Orphica." In In Oxford Handbook of Hesiod, edited by A. Loney & S. Scully, 225-242. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/classics_pubs/125 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Deviant Origins: Hesiod’s Theogony and the Orphica Oxford Handbooks Online Deviant Origins: Hesiod’s Theogony and the Orphica Radcliffe G. Edmonds III The Oxford Handbook of Hesiod Edited by Alexander C. Loney and Stephen Scully Print Publication Date: Sep 2018 Subject: Classical Studies, Classical Poetry, Classical Religions and Mythologies Online Publication Date: Aug 2018 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190209032.013.43 Abstract and Keywords Hesiod’s Theogony provides one of the most widely authoritative accounts of the origin of the cosmos, but his account has always been challenged by rivals claiming to be older, wiser, and better, and the name of Orpheus has always been privileged in the evidence for ancient rivals to Hesiod. The Orphic accounts play their variations on the Hesiodic themes, riffing in different ways on the idea of the ultimate origin of the cosmos; the processes of reproduction by which subsequent entities were generated; the conflicts between these divinities that created the changes from the original state to the current one; the way in which humans entered the story; and the final resolution of the conflicts and changes that created the current, normal order of Zeus.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawes, Greta, 'Metamorphosis and Metamorphic Identity: the Myth Of
    METAMORPHOSIS AND METAMORPHIC IDENTITY: THE MYTH OF ACTAEON IN WORKS OF OVID, DANTE AND JOHN GOWER Greta Hawes To speak of metamorphosis in mythological terms is usually to refer to a feature of the mythic narrative in which a character undergoes a major, and usually irrevocable, change.1 Yet myths are themselves, over time, subject to metamorphic processes and such changes are, likewise, major and irrevocable. The corpus of classical mythology has provided fertile ground for the imposition of a variety of interpretative and literary aims in the works of both classical and subsequent writ- ers. The myths which come to establish themselves within interpretative communities are those which are seen to be somehow relevant to the context of their retelling. Such relevance is not ne- cessarily attached to the form of the myth—the organisation of its narrative elements—but tends to depend on the significance deemed inherent in the myth at the point of reception. The signifi- cance of a single narrative form can change markedly with its migration through diverse interpre- tative communities and it is this flexibility of significance which allows the myth to continue to be recognised as ‘true’ in the face of changing social, poetic, moralistic and personal concerns. The story of the young hunter Actaeon, which retained a relatively stable narrative form through Latin literature and into the medieval period, provides but one example of the way in which evolving cultural and literary traditions can influence the reading of a mythological narra- tive. The story of the myth of Actaeon might just as well be traced from its earliest mentions in archaic fragments to its latest incarnations in works of Seamus Heaney and Ted Hughes, for ex- ample.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulfinch's Mythology
    Bulfinch's Mythology Thomas Bulfinch Bulfinch's Mythology Table of Contents Bulfinch's Mythology..........................................................................................................................................1 Thomas Bulfinch......................................................................................................................................1 PUBLISHERS' PREFACE......................................................................................................................3 AUTHOR'S PREFACE...........................................................................................................................4 STORIES OF GODS AND HEROES..................................................................................................................7 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................7 CHAPTER II. PROMETHEUS AND PANDORA...............................................................................13 CHAPTER III. APOLLO AND DAPHNEPYRAMUS AND THISBE CEPHALUS AND PROCRIS7 CHAPTER IV. JUNO AND HER RIVALS, IO AND CALLISTODIANA AND ACTAEONLATONA2 AND THE RUSTICS CHAPTER V. PHAETON.....................................................................................................................27 CHAPTER VI. MIDASBAUCIS AND PHILEMON........................................................................31 CHAPTER VII. PROSERPINEGLAUCUS AND SCYLLA............................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Studies Departmental Library Booklist
    Page 1 of 81 Department of Classical Studies Library Listing Call Number ISBN # Title Edition Author Author 2 Author 3 Publisher Year Quantity 0 584100051 The origins of alchemy in Graeco-Roman Egypt Jack Lindsay, 1900- London, Frederick Muller Limited 1970 0 500275866 The Mycenaeans Revised edition Lord William Taylour, London, Thames & Hudson 1990 M. Tulli Ciceronis oratio Philippica secunda : with introduction and 6280.A32P2 Stereotyped edition Marcus Tullius Cicero A. G. Peskett, ed. London, Cambridge University Press 1896 notes by A.G. Peskett A258.A75 1923 A practical introduction to Greek prose composition New Impression Thomas Kerchever Evelyn Abbott London : Longmans, Green, and Co. 1923 Gaius Valerius London : Heinemann ; New York : G. P. A6264.A2 Catullus, Tibullus, and Pervigilium Veneris F. W. Cornish 1931 Catullus, Tibullus Putnam's Sons Lucretius on matter and man. Extracts from books I, II, IV & V of the De scientific appendices AC1.E8 A. S. Cox N. A. M. Wallis London, G. Bell & Sons Ltd. 1967 rerum natura. by R.I. Gedye AM1.M76 1981 3 59810118X Museums of the world Third, revised edition Judy Benson, ed. Barbara Fischer, ed. [et al] München ; New York : K.G. Saur 1981 AM101.B87 T73 1971 0 002118343 Treasures of the British Museum: with an introduction Sir John Wolfenden London, Collins 1971 AS121.H47 Vol. 104 & Dublin : Hodges, Figgis & Co. Ltd. ; ISSN: 0018-1750 Hermathena : a Dublin University review No. CIV, Spring 1967 Trinity College Dublin 1967 105 1967 London : The Academic Press Ltd. AS121.H47 Vol. 110 - Dublin : Hodges, Figgis & Co. Ltd. ; ISSN: 0018-1750 Hermathena : a Dublin University review No.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Mythology / Apollodorus; Translated by Robin Hard
    Great Clarendon Street, Oxford 0X2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paulo Shanghai Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw with associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Robin Hard 1997 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published as a World’s Classics paperback 1997 Reissued as an Oxford World’s Classics paperback 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organizations. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Apollodorus. [Bibliotheca. English] The library of Greek mythology / Apollodorus; translated by Robin Hard.
    [Show full text]