Persians” and the “Scythians”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Persians” and the “Scythians” Chapter 3 The “Persians” and the “Scythians” 1 Historical Background In the seventh to the ninth centuries, with some exceptions, there were three major groups of newcomers from the Muslim Orient to Byzantium: Muslim prisoners of war and hostages, merchants and diplomats, and “political” ref- ugees. In the first centuries of the Caliphate’s existence, when military con- frontation between Muslims and the Byzantine empire reached its apogee, the most numerous group of Muslims in the empire’s territory most likely comprised Muslim prisoners of war. In the second half of the tenth century, Ibn Hawqal referred to Byzantine prisons for Muslim captives in the themata of the Thracesians, Opsikion, and Bucellarians. Some prisoners were kept in Constantinople. Most Muslim captives returned home (being ransomed or as part of prisoner swaps). Some of them, however, were Christianized and settled by the Byzantines in abandoned lands or were enslaved. Both settlers and slaves, being scattered throughout the provinces of the empire, dispersed into the local population, and were quickly assimilated, particularly through marriage. Since the end of the ninth century, Muslim merchants were fre- quent visitors in Byzantine trade centers. Judging by the Arabic geographi- cal tradition, Muslim merchants knew the Byzantine system of international trade including markets and trade routes. Muslim merchants were abundant in Constantinople, possibly the only city in the empire where a permanent Muslim trading colony existed. From time to time, groups of immigrants who were forced out of Muslim territory found asylum in Byzantium. Some belonged to diverse Christian communities and sects. More rarely the Byzantine bor- der was crossed by non-Christian and Muslim refugees who were allowed to remain in the empire provided they adopt Christianity. An example of the latter category are the Iranian Khurramites who fled to Byzantium during the reign of Theophilos (829–42), “the Moors” who most likely came from North Africa and were settled in southwest Anatolia (tenth c.), and 12,000 Arab horsemen with their families who fled from Nisibis in 941. Byzantine authorities, as a rule, divided the immigrants into small groups and sent them to different provinces of the empire to speed up their assimilation with the local population. Usually, the immigrants, scattered in the vast expanses of the empire, lost their ethnic and religious identity by the second generation. A separate phenomenon of the east Byzantine periphery is represented by limitrophe Akritic zones where © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���6 | doi ��.��63/9789004307759_005 The “Persians” and the “Scythians” 87 the population movement in both directions across the frontier was rather intensive. The defection of warriors of the Arab thughūr to the enemy side was frequent, and these renegades resettled in the Byzantine border regions. Their number most likely increased during the Byzantine reconquest of Syria in the tenth and eleventh centuries. The assimilating factor of baptism, according to the epics Digenes Akrites, played as important a role for these Arab defectors as in other cases. Judging by Byzantine seals, in the middle and upper layers of the Byzantine state hierarchy in the tenth through the eleventh centuries, a sig- nificant number of individuals from the Orient bore Arabic names.1 However, it is difficult to establish whether these immigrants from the east were Muslim renegades or Arabicized Syrian Christians who also used Arabic names. In any case, the Muslim immigrants either soon lost their initial religious identity (as in the case of refugees and defectors) or represented marginal Muslim groups of foreign subjects (as in the case of merchants and prisoners of war) outside the Byzantine social organization and juridical system.2 1 Laurent, Vitalien. Le corpus des sceaux de l’empire byzantin, 2 vols in 5 pts (Paris, 1963–81), 2: nos 106, 208, 253, 380, 407, 558, 591, 808, 904, 916, 922, 923, 1040, 1163, 1204, etc. Some up-to- date information from Byzantine sigillography, see in: Cheynet, Jean-Claude. “L’apport arabe à l’aristocratie byzantine des Xe–XIe siècles,” in Idem. La société byzantine. L’apport des sceaux (Paris, 2008), pp. 627–46. 2 There is still no general study of the Arab immigrants in Byzantium, although some par- ticular aspects of the problem have been discussed in many studies: Canard, Marius. “Les relations politiques et sociales entre Byzance et les Arabes,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 18 (1964), pp. 33–56; Idem. Byzance et les Musulmans du Proche Orient. Variorum (London, 1973), nos 1, 15; Charanis, Peter. Studies on the Demography of the Byzantine Empire. Variorum (London, 1972); Rydén, Lennart. “The Portrait of the Arab Samônas in Byzantine Literature,” Graeco-Arabica 3 (1984), pp. 101–09; Reinert, Stephen W. “The Muslim Presence in Constantinople, 9th–15th Centuries: Some Preliminary Observations,” in Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire, ed. Hélène Ahrweiler and Angeliki E. Laiou (Washington, DC, 1998), pp. 125–50; Ditten, Hans. Ethnische Ferschiebungen zwischen der Balkanhalbinsel und Kleinasien von Ende des 6. bis zur zweiten Hälfte des 9. Jahrhunderts (Berlin, 1993); Oikonomides, Nicolas. “L’organisation de la frontière orientale de Byzance aux 10e–11e siècles et le taktikon de l’Escorial,” in Actes du XIVe congrès international des études byzantines, 1 (Bucharest, 1974), pp. 285–302; Balivet, Michel. Romanie byzantine et pays de Rûm turc: histoire d’un espace d’imbrication gréco-turque (Istanbul, 1994), ch. 1, pp. 12–14 and nn. 10–12; Dagron, Gilbert. “Formes et fonctions du pluralisme linguistique à Byzance (IXe– XIIe siècle),” Travaux et mémoires 12 (1994), pp. 219–40. For Khurramites, see: Cheynet, Jean- Claude. “Théophile, Théophobe et les Perses,” in Lampakis, Stelios (ed.), Η Βυζαντινή Μικρά Ασία (6ος–12ος αι.), pp. 39–50; Idem. “L’apport arabe,” pp. 627–46; Letsios, Dimitrios. “Theophilos and his ‘Khurramite’ Policy: Some Reconsiderations,” Graeco-Arabica 9–10 (2004), pp. 249–71; Bibikov, Mikhail V. “К вопросу об иноземцах в византийской государственной элите,” in .
Recommended publications
  • Turkomans Between Two Empires
    TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) A Ph.D. Dissertation by RIZA YILDIRIM Department of History Bilkent University Ankara February 2008 To Sufis of Lāhijan TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by RIZA YILDIRIM In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA February 2008 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Oktay Özel Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Halil Đnalcık Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Yaşar Ocak Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Evgeni Radushev Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-'Usur Al-Wusta, Volume 23 (2015)
    AL-ʿUṢŪR AL-WUSṬĀ 23 (2015) THE JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EAST MEDIEVALISTS About Middle East Medievalists (MEM) is an international professional non-profit association of scholars interested in the study of the Islamic lands of the Middle East during the medieval period (defined roughly as 500-1500 C.E.). MEM officially came into existence on 15 November 1989 at its first annual meeting, held ni Toronto. It is a non-profit organization incorporated in the state of Illinois. MEM has two primary goals: to increase the representation of medieval scholarship at scholarly meetings in North America and elsewhere by co-sponsoring panels; and to foster communication among individuals and organizations with an interest in the study of the medieval Middle East. As part of its effort to promote scholarship and facilitate communication among its members, MEM publishes al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā (The Journal of Middle East Medievalists). EDITORS Antoine Borrut, University of Maryland Matthew S. Gordon, Miami University MANAGING EDITOR Christiane-Marie Abu Sarah, University of Maryland EDITORIAL BOARD, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AL-ʿUṢŪR AL-WUSṬĀ (THE JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EAST MEDIEVALISTS) MIDDLE EAST MEDIEVALISTS Zayde Antrim, Trinity College President Sobhi Bourdebala, University of Tunis Matthew S. Gordon, Miami University Muriel Debié, École Pratique des Hautes Études Malika Dekkiche, University of Antwerp Vice-President Fred M. Donner, University of Chicago Sarah Bowen Savant, Aga Khan University David Durand-Guédy, Institut Français de Recherche en Iran and Research
    [Show full text]
  • Migration History of the Afro-Eurasian Transition Zone, C. 300
    Chapter 1 Migration History of the Afro-Eurasian Transition Zone, c. 300–1500: An Introduction (with a Chronological Table of Selected Events of Political and Migration History) Johannes Preiser-Kapeller, Lucian Reinfandt and Yannis Stouraitis When the process of compilation of this volume started in 2014, migration was without doubt already a “hot” topic. Yet, it were only the events of 2015,1 which put migration on top of the discussion about the Euro and the economic crisis in the agenda of politicians, the wider public and the media. In this heated debate, the events of past migrations have been employed in a biased manner as arguments against a new “Völkerwanderung” destined to disintegrate Eu- rope as it did with the (Western) Roman Empire. Thus, the present volume could be seen, among other things, also as an effort to provide a corrective to such oversimplifying recourses to the ancient and medieval period.2 It should be noted, however, that it was planned and drafted before the events. The volume emerged from a series of papers given at the European Social Science History Conference in Vienna in April 2014 in two sessions on “Early Medieval Migrations” organized by Professors Dirk Hoerder and Johannes Koder. Their aim was to integrate the migration history of the medieval period into the wider discourse of migration studies and to include recent research. The three editors have added contributions by specialists for other periods and regions in order to cover as wide an area and a spectrum of forms of migration as possible. Still, it was not possible to cover all regions, periods and migra- tion movements with the same weight; as one of the anonymous reviewers properly pointed out, the “work’s centre of gravity is (…) between the Eastern Mediterranean region and the Tigris/Euphrates”, with Africa not included in a similar way as Asia or Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Azerbaijan (Textbook)
    DILGAM ISMAILOV HISTORY OF AZERBAIJAN (TEXTBOOK) Azerbaijan Architecture and Construction University Methodological Council of the meeting dated July 7, 2017, was published at the direction of № 6 BAKU - 2017 Dilgam Yunis Ismailov. History of Azerbaijan, AzMİU NPM, Baku, 2017, p.p.352 Referents: Anar Jamal Iskenderov Konul Ramiq Aliyeva All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means. Electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. In Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, the book “History of Azerbaijan” is written on the basis of a syllabus covering all topics of the subject. Author paid special attention to the current events when analyzing the different periods of Azerbaijan. This book can be used by other high schools that also teach “History of Azerbaijan” in English to bachelor students, master students, teachers, as well as to the independent learners of our country’s history. 2 © Dilgam Ismailov, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword…………………………………….……… 9 I Theme. Introduction to the history of Azerbaijan 10 II Theme: The Primitive Society in Azerbaijan…. 18 1.The Initial Residential Dwellings……….............… 18 2.The Stone Age in Azerbaijan……………………… 19 3.The Copper, Bronze and Iron Ages in Azerbaijan… 23 4.The Collapse of the Primitive Communal System in Azerbaijan………………………………………….... 28 III Theme: The Ancient and Early States in Azer- baijan. The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms.. 30 1.The First Tribal Alliances and Initial Public Institutions in Azerbaijan……………………………. 30 2.The Kingdom of Manna…………………………… 34 3.The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms………….
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantina Symmeikta
    Byzantina Symmeikta Vol. 29, 2019 Arab apostates in Byzantium: Evidence from Arabic sources RAMADAN Abdelaziz Department of History, Faculty of Humanities, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.18441 Copyright © 2019 Abdelaziz Muhammad Ramadan To cite this article: RAMADAN, A. (2019). Arab apostates in Byzantium: Evidence from Arabic sources. Byzantina Symmeikta, 29, 273-314. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.18441 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 03/10/2021 01:43:06 | INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH ΙΝΣΤΙΤΟΥΤΟ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΩΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ SECTION OF BYZANTINE RESEARCH ΤΟΜΕΑΣ ΒΥΖΑΝΤΙΝΩΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ NATIONAL HELLENIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION ΕΘΝΙΚΟ IΔΡΥΜΑ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ Τομοσ 29 VOLUME EFI RAGIA THE GEOGRAPHY OF THE PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION ABDELAZIZ RAMAḍāN OF THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE (CA 600-1200): I.1. THE APOTHEKAI OF ASIA MINOR (7TH-8TH C.) ARAB APOSTATES IN BYZANTIUM: EVIDENCE FROM ARABIC SOURCES ΑΘΗΝΑΑΘΗΝΑ • 20192009 •• ATHENSATHENS http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 03/10/2021 01:43:06 | ABDELAZIZ RAMAḍāN King Khalid University-Saudi Arabia ARAB APOSTATES IN BYZANTIUM: EVIDENCE FROM ARABIC SOURCES* Islamic-Byzantine relations have attracted close attention of many scholars specialized in the history of the two worlds. Several studies have appeared on various political, diplomatic, and other cultural aspects of these relations. However, there are still some aspects that need to be further highlighted, including the status of the minorities of each side on the territory of the other. In 1998, S. Reinert published an article dealing with the Muslim presence in Constantinople from the 9th century until the 15th century, which he opened by saying: “The subject I am treating here, namely, the Muslim populations in the Byzantine Empire, is a topic on which extremely little has been written.
    [Show full text]
  • Itinerary Brilliant Persia Tour (24 Days)
    Edited: May2019 Itinerary Brilliant Persia Tour (24 Days) Day 1: Arrive in Tehran, visiting Tehran, fly to Shiraz (flight time 1 hour 25 min) Sightseeing: The National Museum of Iran, Golestan Palace, Bazaar, National Jewelry Museum. Upon your pre-dawn arrival at Tehran airport, our representative carrying our show card (transfer information) will meet you and transfer you to your hotel. You will have time to rest and relax before our morning tour of Tehran begins. To avoid heavy traffic, taking the subway is the best way to visit Tehran. We take the subway and charter taxis so that we make most of the day and visit as many sites as possible. We begin the day early morning with a trip to the National Museum of Iran; an institution formed of two complexes; the Museum of Ancient Iran which was opened in 1937, and the Museum of the Islamic Era which was opened in 1972.It hosts historical monuments dating back through preserved ancient and medieval Iranian antiquities, including pottery vessels, metal objects, textile remains, and some rare books and coins. We will see the “evolution of mankind” through the marvelous display of historic relics. Next on the list is visiting the Golestan Palace, the former royal Qajar complex in Iran's capital city, Tehran. It is one of the oldest historic monuments of world heritage status belonging to a group of royal buildings that were once enclosed within the mud-thatched walls of Tehran's Arg ("citadel"). It consists of gardens, royal buildings, and collections of Iranian crafts and European presents from the 18th and 19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Edited: May2019 M Itinerary Perfect Persia Tour
    Edited: May2019 M Itinerary Perfect Persia Tour (28 Days) Day 1: Arrive in Tehran, visiting Tehran, fly to Mashhad (flight time approx. 1 hour and 30 mins) Sightseeing: The National Museum of Iran, Golestan Palace, Bazaar, National Jewelry Museum Upon your pre-dawn arrival at Tehran airport, our representative carrying our show card (transfer information) will meet you and transfer you to your hotel. You will have time to rest and relax before our morning tour of Tehran begins. To avoid heavy traffic, taking the subway is the best way to visit Tehran. We take the subway and charter taxis so that we make most of the day and visit as many sites as possible. Bear in mind that we take the subway complying with the conditions and the preference of the tour guide. We begin the day early morning with a trip to the National Museum of Iran; an institution formed of two complexes; the Museum of Ancient Iran which was opened in 1937, and the Museum of the Islamic Era which was opened in 1972. It hosts historical monuments dating back through preserved ancient and medieval Iranian antiquities, including pottery vessels, metal objects, textile remains, and some rare books and coins.We will see the “evolution of mankind” through the marvelous display of historic relics. Next on the list is visiting the Golestan Palace, the former royal Qajar complex in Iran's capital city, Tehran. It is one of the oldest historic monuments of world heritage status belonging to a group of royal buildings that were once enclosed within the mud- thatched walls of Tehran's Arg ("citadel").
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Byzantina Symmeikta Vol. 28, 2018 Popular Political Agency in Byzantium's villages and towns KRALLIS Dimitris Simon Fraser University https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.14370 Copyright © 2018 Dimitris Krallis To cite this article: KRALLIS, D. (2018). Popular Political Agency in Byzantium's villages and towns. Byzantina Symmeikta, 28, 11-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.14370 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 02/10/2021 12:56:58 | INSTITUTE OF HISTORICAL RESEARCH ΙΝΣΤΙΤΟΥΤΟ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΩΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ SECTION OF BYZANTINE RESEARCH ΤΟΜΕΑΣ ΒΥΖΑΝΤΙΝΩΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ NATIONAL HELLENIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION ΕΘΝΙΚΟ IΔΡΥΜΑ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ Τομοσ 28 VOLUME EFI RAGIA THE GEOGRAPHY OF THE PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION DIMITRIS KRALLIS OF THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE (CA 600-1200): I.1. THE APOTHEKAI OF ASIA MINOR (7TH-8TH C.) POPULAR POLITICAL AGENCY IN BYZANTIUM⁅S VILLAGES AND TOWNS ΑΘΗΝΑ • 20092018 • ATHENS http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 02/10/2021 12:56:58 | DIMITRIS KRALLIS POPULAR POLITICAL AGENCY IN BYZANTIUM’S VILLAGES AND TOWNS “Merely to classify governments as monarchies aristocracies, and democracies is, as we know, to omit a tremendous amount of what is politically interesting” R. E. DOWLING (1972) “Politics is, quite simply, the art of getting things done. It is the art of winning agreement, of mobilizing support, of gaining consensus” H. A. DRAKE (2000) A renewed interest in urban sociability, popular political agency, and collective identity marks recent studies that critique the established view of Byzantium as a multiethnic, quasi-theocratic, and despotic empire1. While, 1. A. KALDELLIS, The Byzantine Republic: People and Power in New Rome, Cambridge MA 2015 is essential for urban politics; N.
    [Show full text]
  • Persians-Khurramites in the Byzantine Military Service During 833–839/840: Military Rank and Functions of Persian Military Units 1 Evgeniy A
    военная организация византийской империи www.volsu.ru DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2020.6.16 UDC 94‘‘833/840’’:355.1 Submitted: 28.03.2020 LBC 63.3(0)4-92 Accepted: 16.11.2020 persians-khurramites in the byzantine military service during 833–839/840: military rank and functions of persian military units 1 evgeniy a. mekhamadiev Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation abstract. Introduction. The scope of this paper is 1) to consider the forms of military service of the Persians within the Byzantine army during the first half of the 9th c., 2) to arrange the chronological order of events related to the involvement of the Persians in Byzantine military service as precisely as possible. The author means the Persians called Khurramites who were representatives of the anti-Islamic and anti-Arabic national movement at the north-west of Iran (territories of modern provinces of East Azerbaijan and Khamadan in the Republic of Iran). Methods. The author considers the single events (Byzantine military campaigns, in which the Persians took part, and also the facts of Persians’ arriving in Byzantium) in a more or less strict chronological order. The researcher turns to an analysis of event history and makes a step-by step, consecutive representation of the process of Persians’ arriving to Byzantine military service. The sources were works of Arabic, Armenian, Georgian and Greek authors (chroniclers, geographers, hagiographers) and seals (evidence of sigillography). Analysis. In 833/834 Byzantine Emperor Theophilos received a group of Persian refugees, who escaped from the Arabs and came to Byzantium.
    [Show full text]
  • In Studies in Byzantine Sigillography, I, Ed. N. Oikonomides (Washington, D.C., 1987), Pp
    Notes I. SOURCES FOR EARLY MEDIEVAL BYZANTIUM 1. N. Oikonomides, 'The Lead Blanks Used for Byzantine Seals', in Studies in Byzantine Sigillography, I, ed. N. Oikonomides (Washington, D.C., 1987), pp. 97-103. 2. John Lydus, De Magistratibus, in Joannes Lydus on Powers, ed. A. C. Bandy (Philadelphia, Penn., 1983), pp. 160-3. 3. Ninth-century deed of sale (897): Actes de Lavra, 1, ed. P. Lemerle, A. Guillou and N. Svoronos (Archives de l'Athos v, Paris, 1970), pp. 85-91. 4. For example, G. Duby, La societe aux xi' et xii' sii!cles dans la region maconnaise, 2nd edn (Paris, 1971); P. Toubert, Les structures du Latium medieval, 2 vols (Rome, 1973). 5. DAI, cc. 9, 46, 52, pp. 56-63, 214-23, 256-7. 6. De Cer., pp. 651-60, 664-78, 696-9. 7. See S. D. Goitein, A Mediterranean Society, 5 vols (Berkeley, Cal., 1967- 88), I, pp. 1-28. , 8. ]. Darrouzes, Epistoliers byzantins du x' sii!cle (Archives de I' orient Chretien VI, Paris, 1960), pp. 217-48. 9. Photius, Epistulae et Amphilochia, ed. B. Laourdas and L. G. Westerink, 6 vols (Leipzig, 1983-8), pope: nrs 288, 290; III, pp. 114-20, 123-38, qaghan of Bulgaria: nrs 1, 271, 287; 1, pp. 1-39; II, pp. 220-1; III, p. 113-14; prince of princes of Armenia: nrs 284, 298; III, pp. 1-97, 167-74; katholikos of Armenia: nr. 285; III, pp. 97-112; eastern patriarchs: nrs 2, 289; 1, pp. 39-53; III, pp. 120-3; Nicholas I, patriarch of Constantinople, Letters, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to the False Book of Asgharzadeh
    ثٚ ٗبّ فلاٝٗل عبٕ ٝ فوك کيیٖ اٗلیْٚ ثورو ثوٗگنهك ----------------------------------------------------------- اىٓ٘ل آلٗل ٝ ٤ٍَ اٍب كه کلی رٝ ؾ٤ كه کلی یبٍب ر٘گ چْٔبٕ گٍٞ ٗبثقوك چبهٝاىاكگبٕ ٕـؾوا گوك ثلٍگبﻻٕ کژ ٜٗبك پِْـذ كٝىفی چٜوگبٕ ٍلِٚ ىّذ ُٜٞؿبی پ٤ِل ٗبٛ٘غبه اژكٛب ُٝ ككإ فٞٗقٞاه ف٤َ كیٞإ كٍ ٍپوكٙ ثٚ هیٞ رب ثٚ گوكْٝٗبٕ ه٤ٍلؿ ٙویٞ ثلگٜو ر٤وٙ ای ا٤ٗواٗی فٞاٍزبهإ ع٘گ ٝ ٝیواٗی کوكٙ اؿْزٚ رٛ ؾ٤ب ثب ىٛو اهىٝٓ٘ل كزؼ ایواْٜٗو ثٚ گٔبٗی کٚ رٜٔزٖ فٞاثَذ ٗوِ ایوإ كزبكٙ ثو اثَذ یب یَ ر٤يچ٘گ ٍوکِ ؛ گٞ٤ هكذ ٝ پوكفزٚ ّل عٜبٕ اى ٞ٤ٗ یب کٚ ث٤ژٕ ؛ ٛژثو هىّ اگبٙ ٍوٗگٕٞ اٝكزبكٙ اٗله چبٙ یب کٚ اهُ ثٚ ر٤و پوربثی ٤َٗذ ّل ىیو گ٘جل اثی یب کٚ ّل ث٤لهكْذ عبكٝ چ٤و ثو ٗجوكٍٞ ٙاه یکٚ ؛ ىهیو یب کٚ اٍل٘لیبه پِٜٞ ٓوك ٝ إ ٜٗبٍ كﻻٝهی پژٓوك ثب ف٤بﻻد فبّ ٍٞ ٝكایی کوكٙ پب كه هکبة فٞكهایی ارِ اكوٝى ٝ عبْٗکبه ٝ عَٞه َٓذ فٞكکبٓگی ى عبّ ؿوٝه ٓوكٓبٗی ٗجوكٙ ثٜوٙ ى ُٞٛ ىٗلگی کوكٙ كه ک٘به ٞؽُٝ ٛٔچٞ اٛویٔ٘بٕ فٞف اٗگ٤ي ربفز٘ل اٍت كزٚ٘ ثب چ٘گ٤ي کٛ ٚ٘٤ب رٞفز٘ل ٝ فٕٞ هاٗلٗل فْک ٝ رو ٛوچٚ ثٞك ٍٞىاٗلٗل ثی فجو ىاٗکٚ اهُ ٝ ث٤ژٕ گٝ ٞ٤ اٍل٘لیبه هٝی٤ٖ رٖ یب ىهیو ٍٞاه ٝ هٍزْ ىاٍ ٝ اٜٚٔٗ ٤ّو ٍوک٤ْلٙ ى یبٍ اى کٞ٤ٓوس ٗبٓلاه ٍزوگ رب ثٚ ثٜٖٔ ؛ یﻻٕ فوك ٝ ثيهگ ٍوثَو ٗبّ گٛٞوی كوكٍذ کٚ ٍزٜ٤٘لٙ رو ىٛو ٓوكٍذ گٛٞوی اثلیلٙ كه کٞهٙ فٕٞ ربهیـ ٝ هػٝ اٍطٞهٙ گٛٞوی ثب رجبهی اى كوٛ٘گ ثَزٚ ثو فْٖ ّوىٙ چٕٞ پبﻻٛ٘گ گٛٞوی ّجچواؽ گٔواٛی ٓطِغ اكزبة اگبٛی گٛٞوی پوٝهٗلٙ ی پبکی كوٙ ای ایيكی ٝ اكﻻکی گٛٞوی ٗقِج٘ل اٗلیْٚ کوكٙ كه فبک ؼٓوكذ هیْٚ ع٘گ إ ثلهگبٕ فْْ اٝه ع٘گ فوٜٓوٙ ثٞك ثب گٛٞو چبُْی كیگو اى گنّزٚ ی كٝه ث٤ٖ پوٝهكگبٕ ظِٔذ ٞٗ ٝه کٜٚ٘ پ٤کبه اٛویٖٔ هایی ثب ٍجک هؽٝی اٞٛهایی کبهىاهی کٚ عي ٚ٤ٍ هٝىی ثلگٔبٕ ها ٗجٞك اى إ هٝىی گ٤و ٝ كاهی کٚ گٛٞو كوٛ٘گ ىك ثو إ ٜٓو ٗبّ ٝ كاؽ ٗ٘گ ٜٓو ٗبٓی کٚ رب ثٚ عبٝیلإ ٓی كهفْل ثٚ ربهک ایوإ كاؽ ٗ٘گی کٚ رب ثٚ هٍزبف٤ي ٓی کْل ربه ّوّ إ چ٘گ٤ي )ایٖ ؼّو کٚ ثٚ رٍٞظ ّبػو ؼٓبٕو ؛ ؾٓٔل پ٤ٔبٕ ؛ ٍوٝكٙ ّلٙ پٞ٤ٍذ ّهبُٚ ای ثٞكٙ اٍذ .
    [Show full text]
  • Translator's Note: Theophobos and Manuel
    Translator's Note: Theophobos and Manuel The information contained in the following pages is essential for any understanding of Book 3 of Genesios (and a few sections of Book 4). I have therefore decided to bring it to the attention of the reader by inter­ rupting the narrative, rather than confine it to an Appendix. Those readers who are familiar with the historical issues can skip this section, which contains no new arguments. But all others are urged to read it before proceeding to the highly confused narrative of Genesios. Except for Theophilos' accession and death, the sections of Book 3 are arranged with an absolute disregard for chronology, and many of the stories are completely fictitious. 1. Book 3 of Genesios is less about Theophilos than about his two generals Theophobos and Manuel, whose careers present major historical problems. Henri Gregoire established that Theophobos was the Greek name adopted by the Khurramite rebel Na~r when he and his followers found refuge in the Empire in 834 and converted to Christianity. 201 Members of the Khurramite religious sect (called 'Persians' by Genesios and the Byzantines) had revolted against the authority of the 'Abbasid Caliphate in Azerbaijan. As early as 816/7 they were under the leader­ ship of a man named Babak.202Na~r is variously seen as a lieutenant of Babak, or as an independent Khurramite rebel.200 In late 833 the forces of the Caliph Mu'ta~im inflicted defeats upon both rebels, and as a conse­ quence Na~r and fourteen thousand of his men migrated to the Byzantine Empire.
    [Show full text]