DOCSLIB.ORG

Newsletter No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Newsletter No. 180 September 2019 Price: $5.00 AUSTRALASIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Council President Vice President Daniel Murphy Heidi Meudt Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Birdwood Avenue PO Box 467, Cable St Melbourne, Vic. 3004 Wellington 6140, New Zealand Australia Tel: (+644)/(4) 381 7127 Tel: (+613)/(03) 9252 2377 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Jennifer Tate John Clarkson School of Fundamental Sciences Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service Massey University Department of Environment and Science Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442 PO Box 975 Atherton QLD 4883 New Zealand Tel: (+617)/(07) 4091 8170 | mob. (+61)/(0)437 732 487 Tel: (+646)/(6) 356-9099 ext. 84718 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Councillor Councillor Ryonen Butcher Hervé Sauquet Western Australian Herbarium Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust Locked Bag 104 Mrs Macquaries Rd Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia Australia Tel: (+612)/(02) 9231 8316 Tel: (+618)/(08) 9219 9136 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Other constitutional bodies Hansjörg Eichler Research Committee Affiliate Society David Glenny Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Sarah Mathews Joanne Birch Katharina Nargar Advisory Standing Committees Murray Henwood Financial Chair: Heidi Meudt, Vice President, ex officio Patrick Brownsey Grant application closing dates David Cantrill Hansjörg Eichler Research Fund: th th Bob Hill on March 14 and September 14 each year. Ad hoc adviser to Committee: Bruce Evans Marlies Eichler Postdoctoral Fellowship: Chair: John Clarkson Treasurer, ex officio on July 31st each year. Grants Policy Gillian Brown Public Officer Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn Anna Monro Jen Tate (Council) Australian National Botanic Gardens Peter Weston GPO Box 1777 Peter Wilson Canberra, ACT 2601 Chair: Heidi Meudt, Vice President, ex officio Tel: (+612) (02) 6250 9530 Email: [email protected] Web presence ASBS Website: www.asbs.org.au ASBS Facebook Group Webmasters Viewable currently to any member of Facebook; Anna Monro permission to join by application to administrators. Australian National Botanic Gardens Administrators Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia Todd McLay, email: [email protected] Tel: (+612) (02) 6250 9530 Mike Bayly, email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Murray Fagg Cover image: Acacia strongylophylla F.Muell. Branch Australian National Botanic Gardens surrounded by (clockwise from top) phyllode, legumes, Tel: (+612) (02) 6250 9561 and seed with funicle. Artist: Ludwik Dutkiewicz. Email: [email protected] From: D.J.E. Whibley & D.E. Symon, Acacias of South Australia, 2nd edn (1992), with permission of Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium (South Australia). Publication dates of previous issue Australas. Syst. Bot. Soc. Newslett. 179 (June 2019) ASBS Web site: 6 Aug 2019. Printed version: 14 Aug 2019. Australasian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 180 (September 2019) From the President I am writing this from Melbourne, in the middle Wellington conference of southern Australian Spring, which I usually As I am writing this, I am just about to book notice first approaching with the flowering of my flights for the 2019 ASBS-NZPCN Joint wattles, as there are a few particularly early Conference: Taxonomy for Plant Conservation flowering species of Acacia that I keep an eye – Ruia mai i Rangiātea to be held on 24–28 out for in late Winter, like Acacia suaveolens. November 2019 in Wellington, New Zealand. Actually, while many people remind me that there It makes me think about the diversity of are Acacia species flowering at all times of the environments and floras our Australasian society year, and yes there really are, there is definitely covers from New Zealand to New Guinea a mass of southern Australian species that flower with Australia in the middle, regions united in late Winter and early Spring (or “Sprinter”, by geographical proximity, biogeography and sensu Entwisle 2014). That is the time most (some) elements of their floras. The monsoon people seem to notice and make mention of them, tropics and arid Australia are certainly markedly hence Wattle Day is marked on 1 September, but different to the temperate biomes in terms of sometimes I think it could just as easily be marked climate, yet they are tied together through their on 1 August. This being said, in metropolitan historical evolutionary links, and I think it is these areas of southern Victoria I probably also notice similarities and differences that make systematic just as much the showy deciduous exotic species, botany so interesting! like the flowering apricots or plums (e.g. Prunus mume), starting to flower in late Winter, or I am Heidi Meudt and Rewi Elliot, on behalf of the hit by the scent of fragrant plants, like Daphne organizing committee, have a detailed update odora, marking the approach of warmer weather about the conference elsewhere in this Newsletter with another sense that is probably stronger than (see p. 16), but they have allowed me a sneak the visual. peek at the Conference program, and it is looking In this corner of Australia, we have been fortunate packed with interesting talks, posters and to have had some decent rainfall, in comparison events. Attention is focussed on the importance to the large parts of Australia in extended of conservation of biodiversity and the place of drought. These drought conditions are no doubt systematics and taxonomy in this endeavour. challenging for many of our ASBS members Over 180 people have now registered, which is and may make us look at issues of global change excellent. The field-trips and workshops all look and how we might make any sort of impact on amazing, and there is still some room on all of these issues, with our work and in our personal these and the conference dinner, so if people want lives. I am not one to advocate for political to register or add extras to their registration they positioning for ASBS, but I do think we need to at still may do so. least engage with the issues and have some role. What that is, I remain unsure, but at some point Prospective attendees can also register for the business-as-usual may not be possible. However, conference until 1 November, so you still have I do think that we can contribute strongly to time not to miss out! the discussion, and perhaps our science of ASBS Funding systematics, phylogenetics and biogeography Congratulations to Trevor Wilson (RBG Sydney), hold some of the only keys to helping understand who has been chosen as the 2019 Marlies Eichler the historic tolerances and responses of the flora Postdoctoral Fellow for his project entitled, to changing climate. This, along with our curated “A new key for Australia’s Bugle Subfamily collections of specimens through time, potentially (Ajugoideae: Lamiaceae): a phylogenetically allow us to act by assisting and informing others informed taxonomy assisted by next generation to understand global change and its impact, and sequencing methods”. The Fellowship will run we should remind ourselves of the importance of for two years beginning on 1 November this year. our work in this respect. 1 Australasian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 180 (September 2019) On other grant news, I mentioned in my previous thoughts go out to those affected. President’s Report that I would like to review if Among many snippets and posts a couple of the current funding that ASBS offers our members others that caught my attention were the Alice is meeting the society’s needs. For this reason, Springs Herbarium recently celebrating its 65th I have just contacted the ASBS Grants Policy anniversary with a post on the ASBS Facebook standing committee (members of this committee page with a photograph of George Chippendale are listed at the front of the Newsletter) with identifying plant specimens, and also notable the aim of activating the committee to review was the 10 year anniversary of the formation the our newest funding scheme, the Marlies Eichler Managers of Australasian Herbarium Collections Postdoctoral Fellowship, now that three rounds of (MAHC) group, who were photographed meeting this fellowship have been offered. in Darwin recently. Nancy T. Burbidge Medallist Postscript I note that the guidelines for the Burbidge Medal Finally, I have just been informed by Bill and regarding its announcement state: “If time Robyn Barker, our excellent Newsletter editors, permits, the decision will be announced in the that they have decided to make this their final next newsletter or failing that in the conference year in that role. This was slightly shocking news program”. to me, and something I have not wanted to think Therefore, it is my great pleasure to announce about I must admit! The ASBS Council will here that the 2019 Burbidge Medallist is Barry discuss how to continue the Newsletter (and it Conn. Without stealing too much thunder for the may not be in its current form necessarily). That upcoming ASBS conference, where Barry will being said, I whole-heartedly thank both Bill and present his Burbidge Lecture, Barry has had a Robyn for all of their efforts on behalf of the long career in systematic and taxonomic botany ASBS membership, for producing a consistently at several institutions, both in Australia and in interesting and content-rich Newsletter for the Papua New Guinea. While Barry formally retired Society. It is a credit to their hard-work, eye for a few years ago from the Royal Botanic Gardens detail and persistence. Sydney, he has remained active on work in New I would also like to put out the call that anyone Guinea and has recently published, with Kipiro who may like to contribute to the Society as Q.
Recommended publications
  • Karl Jordan: a Life in Systematics

    Karl Jordan: a Life in Systematics

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Kristin Renee Johnson for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of SciencePresented on July 21, 2003. Title: Karl Jordan: A Life in Systematics Abstract approved: Paul Lawrence Farber Karl Jordan (1861-1959) was an extraordinarily productive entomologist who influenced the development of systematics, entomology, and naturalists' theoretical framework as well as their practice. He has been a figure in existing accounts of the naturalist tradition between 1890 and 1940 that have defended the relative contribution of naturalists to the modem evolutionary synthesis. These accounts, while useful, have primarily examined the natural history of the period in view of how it led to developments in the 193 Os and 40s, removing pre-Synthesis naturalists like Jordan from their research programs, institutional contexts, and disciplinary homes, for the sake of synthesis narratives. This dissertation redresses this picture by examining a naturalist, who, although often cited as important in the synthesis, is more accurately viewed as a man working on the problems of an earlier period. This study examines the specific problems that concerned Jordan, as well as the dynamic institutional, international, theoretical and methodological context of entomology and natural history during his lifetime. It focuses upon how the context in which natural history has been done changed greatly during Jordan's life time, and discusses the role of these changes in both placing naturalists on the defensive among an array of new disciplines and attitudes in science, and providing them with new tools and justifications for doing natural history. One of the primary intents of this study is to demonstrate the many different motives and conditions through which naturalists came to and worked in natural history.
  • Otanewainuku ED (Report Prepared on 13 August 2013)

    Otanewainuku ED (Report Prepared on 13 August 2013)

    1 NZFRI collection wish list for Otanewainuku ED (Report prepared on 13 August 2013) Fern Ally Isolepis cernua Lycopodiaceae Isolepis inundata Lycopodium fastigiatum Isolepis marginata Lycopodium scariosum Isolepis pottsii Psilotaceae Isolepis prolifera Tmesipteris lanceolata Lepidosperma australe Lepidosperma laterale Gymnosperm Schoenoplectus pungens Cupressaceae Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Schoenus apogon Cupressus macrocarpa Schoenus tendo Pinaceae Uncinia filiformis Pinus contorta Uncinia gracilenta Pinus patula Uncinia rupestris Pinus pinaster Uncinia scabra Pinus ponderosa Hemerocallidaceae Pinus radiata Dianella nigra Pinus strobus Phormium cookianum subsp. hookeri Podocarpaceae Phormium tenax Podocarpus totara var. totara Iridaceae Prumnopitys taxifolia Crocosmia xcrocosmiiflora Libertia grandiflora Monocotyledon Libertia ixioides Agapanthaceae Watsonia bulbillifera Agapanthus praecox Juncaceae Alliaceae Juncus articulatus Allium triquetrum Juncus australis Araceae Juncus conglomeratus Alocasia brisbanensis Juncus distegus Arum italicum Juncus edgariae Lemna minor Juncus effusus var. effusus Zantedeschia aethiopica Juncus sarophorus Arecaceae Juncus tenuis var. tenuis Rhopalostylis sapida Luzula congesta Asparagaceae Luzula multiflora Asparagus aethiopicus Luzula picta var. limosa Asparagus asparagoides Orchidaceae Cordyline australis x banksii Acianthus sinclairii Cordyline banksii x pumilio Aporostylis bifolia Asteliaceae Corunastylis nuda Collospermum microspermum Diplodium alobulum Commelinaceae
  • Peter Kropotkin and the Social Ecology of Science in Russia, Europe, and England, 1859-1922

    Peter Kropotkin and the Social Ecology of Science in Russia, Europe, and England, 1859-1922

    THE STRUGGLE FOR COEXISTENCE: PETER KROPOTKIN AND THE SOCIAL ECOLOGY OF SCIENCE IN RUSSIA, EUROPE, AND ENGLAND, 1859-1922 by ERIC M. JOHNSON A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) May 2019 © Eric M. Johnson, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: The Struggle for Coexistence: Peter Kropotkin and the Social Ecology of Science in Russia, Europe, and England, 1859-1922 Submitted by Eric M. Johnson in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Examining Committee: Alexei Kojevnikov, History Research Supervisor John Beatty, Philosophy Supervisory Committee Member Mark Leier, History Supervisory Committee Member Piers Hale, History External Examiner Joy Dixon, History University Examiner Lisa Sundstrom, Political Science University Examiner Jaleh Mansoor, Art History Exam Chair ii Abstract This dissertation critically examines the transnational history of evolutionary sociology during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. Tracing the efforts of natural philosophers and political theorists, this dissertation explores competing frameworks at the intersection between the natural and human sciences – Social Darwinism at one pole and Socialist Darwinism at the other, the latter best articulated by Peter Alexeyevich Kropotkin’s Darwinian theory of mutual aid. These frameworks were conceptualized within different scientific cultures during a contentious period both in the life sciences as well as the sociopolitical environments of Russia, Europe, and England. This cross- pollination of scientific and sociopolitical discourse contributed to competing frameworks of knowledge construction in both the natural and human sciences.
  • Chatswood to Sydenham EIS 799 Chapter 20 – Biodiversity

    Chatswood to Sydenham EIS 799 Chapter 20 – Biodiversity

    BIODIVERSITY CHAPTER TWENTY 20 Biodiversity This chapter provides an assessment of the biodiversity impacts as a result of the construction and operation of the project and identifies mitigation measures to minimise these impacts. This chapter draws on information in Technical paper 9 – Biodiversity. 20.1 Secretary’s environmental assessment requirements The Secretary’s environmental assessment requirements relating to biodiversity, and where these requirements are addressed in this Environmental Impact Statement, are outlined in Table 20-1. Table 20-1 Secretary’s environmental assessment requirements – biodiversity Ref. Secretary’s environmental assessment requirements Where addressed 5. Biodiversity 5.1. The Proponent must assess biodiversity impacts in accordance The Framework for with the current guidelines including the Framework for Biodiversity Assessment is Biodiversity Assessment (FBA). addressed in Section 20.2.5. 5.2. The Proponent must assess any impacts on biodiversity values The Framework for not covered by the FBA as specified in s2.3. Biodiversity Assessment is addressed in Section 20.2.5. 5.3. The Proponent must assess impacts on the following [EECs, Biodiversity impacts are threatened species and/or populations] and provide the addressed in Section 20.4. information specified in s9.2 of the FBA. 5.4. The Proponent must identify whether the project as a whole, Biodiversity impacts are or any component of the project, would be classified as a addressed in Section 20.4. Key Threatening Process (KTP) in accordance with the listings in the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1997 (TSC Act), Fisheries Management Act 1994 (FM Act) and Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 2000 (EPBC Act).
  • Tiere Und Menschen Als Exoten : Exotisierende Sichtweisen Auf

    Tiere Und Menschen Als Exoten : Exotisierende Sichtweisen Auf

    Tiere und Menschen als Exoten - Exotisierende Sichtweisen auf das „Andere“ in der Gründungs- und Entwicklungsphase der Zoos Von der Philosophischen Fakultät der Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover zur Erlangung eines Doktors der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) genehmigte Dissertation von Utz Anhalt, geboren am 19.3.1971 in Hannover Die Promotion wurde nach der mündlichen Doktorprüfung am 25.1.2007 von 15.00-17.00 mit Magna cum laude beendet: Erstprüfer war Prof. Dr. Ingolf Ahlers, Zweitprüfer Prof. Dr. Gert Schäfer, Prüfungsvorsitzende Prof. Dr. Barbara Duden. Inhaltsverzeichnis I. Einführung in die Thematik.................................................................................. S.1. I.1 Einleitung............................................................................................................... S.1-3 I.2 Exotismus / Eine Begriffsbestimmung................................................................... S.3-20 I.3 Thesen..................................................................................................................... S.20-23 I.4 Der Zugang in den Zoo von gestern / Methodik..................................................... S.23-35 I.5 Literatur und sonstige Quellen................................................................................ S.36-50 I.6 Das Tier als Fremdes............................................................................................... S.50-61 II. Was ist ein Zoo?....................................................................................................
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
  • Botanical Name

    Botanical Name

    Barrm Birrm - Plant List Common Name Botanical Name Family 1 Thin-leaf or Snake Wattle Acacia aculeatissima Mimosaceae 2 Silver Wattle Acacia dealbata Mimosaceae 3 Spreading Wattle Acacia genistifolia Mimosaceae 4 Ploughshare Wattle Acacia gunnii Mimosaceae 5 Cinnamon Wattle Acacia leprosa var. uninervia Mimosaceae 6 Black Wattle Acacia mearnsii Mimosaceae 7 Blackwood Acacia melanoxylon Mimosaceae 8 Dwarf Silver-wattle Acacia nano-dealbata Mimosaceae 9 Hedge Wattle Acacia paradoxa Mimosaceae 10 Wattle hybrid Acacia paradoxa x leprosa Mimosaceae 11 Wirilda Acacia provincialis Mimosaceae 12 Golden Wattle Acacia pycnantha Mimosaceae 13 Hop Wattle Acacia stricta Mimosaceae 14 Dandenong Cinnamon-wattle Acacia strictophylla Mimosaceae 15 Prickly Moses Acacia verticillata Mimosaceae 16 Bidgee-widgee Acaena novae-zelandiae Rosaceae 17 Sheep's Burr Acaena ovina Rosaceae 18 Small Mosquito-orchid Acianthus pusillus Orchidaceae 19 Trailing Ground-berry Acrotriche prostrata Epacridaceae 20 Honey Pots Acrotriche serrulata Epacridaceae 21 Maidenhair Fern Adiantum aethiopicum Adiantaceae 22 Austral Bugle Ajuga australis Lamiaceae 23 Black Sheoak Allocasuarina littoralis Casuarinaceae 24 Drooping Mistletoe Amyema pendula Loranthaceae 25 Pale Vanilla-lily Arthropodium milleflorum Liliaceae 26 Chocolate Lily Arthropodium strictum Liliaceae 27 Prickly Woodruff Asperula scoparia Rubiaceae 28 Cranberry Heath Astroloma humifusum Epacridaceae 29 Hill Wallaby-grass Austrodanthonia eriantha Poaceae 30 Copper-awned Wallaby-grass Austrodanthonia fulva Poaceae 31
  • JABG22P101 Barker

    JABG22P101 Barker

    JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2008 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 22 (2008) 101 –104 © 2008 Department for Environment & Heritage, Government of South Australia NOTES & SH ORT COMMUNICATIONS New combinations in Pterostylis and Caladenia and other name changes in the Orchidaceae of South Australia R.M. Barker & R.J. Bates State Herbarium of South Australia, Plant Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Combinations are provided in Pterostylis and Caladenia (Orchidaceae) for new species initially described in the segregate genera Arachnorchis, Bunochilus and Oligochaetochilus. Recircumscription of existing species has led to some new species being recognised for South Australia and Prasophyllum sp. West Coast (R.Tate AD96945167) is now known as Prasophyllum catenemum D.L.Jones. Introduction within Pterostylis2 R.Br. will not be adopted. Both In the past, when there have been disagreements genera in the wider sense are recognised as monophyletic between botanists about the level at which species (Hopper & Brown 2004; Jones & Clements 2002b) should be recognised, the arguments have not impinged and for the practical purpose of running Australia’s particularly on the outside community.
  • Genetic Comparison Between Victorian and Tasmanian Populations of Prasophyllum Correctum D.L

    Genetic Comparison Between Victorian and Tasmanian Populations of Prasophyllum Correctum D.L

    Muelleria 18: 79–87 (2003) Genetic comparison between Victorian and Tasmanian populations of Prasophyllum correctum D.L. Jones (Orchidaceae) suggests separate species L. A. Orthia1, R. C. Garrick1 and E. A. James1,2 1Genetics Department, La Trobe University, VIC. 3086. 2National Herbarium of Victoria, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Private Bag 2000, VIC. 3141. Abstract Genetic variation within and between Tasmanian and Victorian populations of the Gaping Leek Orchid Prasophyllum correctum (Orchidaceae) was investigated using the Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) method. The degree of fixed genetic differences between the two populations was substantial, suggesting that each population constitutes a different species. The Tasmanian population contained very little genetic variation, indicating that asexual reproduction or self-fertilisation may be the predominant reproductive mode, but this population does not appear to be clonal. Individuals from the Victorian population exhibited high levels of genetic variation relative to those from the Tasmanian population. These findings suggest that the Victorian and Tasmanian P. correctum populations ought to be managed separately, and cross-pollination or translocation should be avoided, because of the lack of genetic similarity between them. Keywords: Prasophyllum, RAPD, genetic variability, conservation Introduction The Gaping Leek Orchid, Prasophyllum correctum D.L. Jones, is a small terrestrial orchid from southeastern Australia. Prasophyllum correctum (Jones 1994) was believed to be endemic to Victoria until plants collected in 1995 from the Campbell Town golf course in Tasmania were identified as P. correctum (Jones 1998). The species is believed to have formerly been widespread throughout lowland Gippsland, but it is currently restricted to two small populations located near Munro and Lindenow South in protected rail reserves (Hoey & Lunt 1995) in Themeda triandra Forssk.
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia

    Native Orchid Society South Australia

    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc PRINT POST APPROVED VOLUME 27 NO. 4 PP 54366200018 MAY 2003 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA POST OFFICE BOX 565 UNLEY SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5061 The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation from the Management Committee no person is authorised to represent the society on any matter. All native orchids are protected plants in the wild. Their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT: SECRETARY: Bodo Jensen Cathy Houston Telephone: 82430051 Work 8347 2005 Telephone: 8356 7356 VICE-PRESIDENT Bob Bates COMMITTEE Bill Dear Peter McCauley Malcolm Guy David Pettifor EDITOR: TREASURER David Hirst Iris Freeman 14 Beaverdale Avenue Windsor Gardens SA 5087 Telephone 8261 7998 E-mail [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves Mr G. Carne Mr L. Nesbitt Mr R. Bates Mr R. Robjohns Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells Registrar of Judges: Reg Shooter Trading Table: Judy Penney Field Trips & Conservation: Thelma Bridle Tel. 83844174 Tuber Bank Coordinator: Malcolm Guy Tel. 82767350 New Members Coordinator David Pettifor Tel. 0416 095 095 PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian The Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. while taking all due care, take no responsibility for the loss, destruction or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits. Views or opinions expressed by authors of articles within this Journal do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Management. We condones the reprint of any articles if acknowledgement is given.
  • Specified Protected Matters Impact Profiles (Including Risk Assessment)

    Specified Protected Matters Impact Profiles (Including Risk Assessment)

    Appendix F Specified Protected Matters impact profiles (including risk assessment) Roads and Maritime Services EPBC Act Strategic Assessment – Strategic Assessment Report 1. FA1 - Wetland-dependent fauna Species included (common name, scientific name) Listing SPRAT ID Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus) Endangered 1001 Oxleyan Pygmy Perch (Nannoperca oxleyana) Endangered 64468 Blue Mountains Water Skink (Eulamprus leuraensis) Endangered 59199 Yellow-spotted Tree Frog/Yellow-spotted Bell Frog (Litoria castanea) Endangered 1848 Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus australicus) Vulnerable 1973 Booroolong Frog (Litoria booroolongensis) Endangered 1844 Littlejohns Tree Frog (Litoria littlejohni) Vulnerable 64733 1.1 Wetland-dependent fauna description Item Summary Description Found in the waters, riparian vegetation and associated wetland vegetation of a diversity of freshwater wetland habitats. B. poiciloptilus is a large, stocky, thick-necked heron-like bird with camouflage-like plumage growing up to 66-76 cm with a wingspan of 1050-1180 cm and feeds on freshwater crustacean, fish, insects, snakes, leaves and fruit. N. oxleyana is light brown to olive coloured freshwater fish with mottling and three to four patchy, dark brown bars extending from head to tail and a whitish belly growing up to 35-60 mm. This is a mobile species that is often observed individually or in pairs and sometimes in small groups but does not form schools and feed on aquatic insects and their larvae (Allen, 1989; McDowall, 1996). E. leuraensis is an insectivorous, medium-sized lizard growing to approximately 20 cm in length. This species has a relatively dark brown/black body when compared to other Eulamprus spp. Also has narrow yellow/bronze to white stripes along its length to beginning of the tail and continuing along the tail as a series of spots (LeBreton, 1996; Cogger, 2000).
  • Dotee Additional Information Requests

    Dotee Additional Information Requests

    Bingara Gorge – EPBC Assessment Report Appendix A: DotEE additional information requests © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 169 Bingara Gorge – EPBC Assessment Report Table 23: Summary of additional information provided RELEVANT INFORMATION REQUESTED BY DotEE – April 2015 SECTION 1. Description of the action; The DotEE considered that actions within the Environmental Protection and Recreation (EP&R) lands may impact on MNES and/or their suitable habitat that occur within and/or adjacent to these areas. Please provide further information relating to works to be undertaken and elements of the action that may impact MNES. These include: a. Further information clarifying the location of the Golf Course, cart bridges, Section 2 and outdoor classroom and pathways within the proposed EP&R lands, including a map Figure 3. clearly indicating the location of all components of the action, preferable with a satellite image indicating the location of all components of the action, preferably with a satellite image overlay. These components of the action will result in the Section 8.8 and fragmentation of areas of SSTF from the broader patch, however the extent of this is Figure 20 unclear based on the maps provided. b. Page 8 of your management plan refers to a buffer zone with component including: stormwater controls, asset protection zones, recreational paths, fences and gates. Based on your description of the buffer zones, any MNES within these areas are considered likely to be impacted by the action. As such, the DotEE requires the location of the buffer zone components, including associated footprints (ha), and the locations of the relevant MNES.