DOCSLIB.ORG

Peter Kropotkin and the Social Ecology of Science in Russia, Europe, and England, 1859-1922

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peter Kropotkin and the Social Ecology of Science in Russia, Europe, and England, 1859-1922 THE STRUGGLE FOR COEXISTENCE: PETER KROPOTKIN AND THE SOCIAL ECOLOGY OF SCIENCE IN RUSSIA, EUROPE, AND ENGLAND, 1859-1922 by ERIC M. JOHNSON A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) May 2019 © Eric M. Johnson, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: The Struggle for Coexistence: Peter Kropotkin and the Social Ecology of Science in Russia, Europe, and England, 1859-1922 Submitted by Eric M. Johnson in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Examining Committee: Alexei Kojevnikov, History Research Supervisor John Beatty, Philosophy Supervisory Committee Member Mark Leier, History Supervisory Committee Member Piers Hale, History External Examiner Joy Dixon, History University Examiner Lisa Sundstrom, Political Science University Examiner Jaleh Mansoor, Art History Exam Chair ii Abstract This dissertation critically examines the transnational history of evolutionary sociology during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. Tracing the efforts of natural philosophers and political theorists, this dissertation explores competing frameworks at the intersection between the natural and human sciences – Social Darwinism at one pole and Socialist Darwinism at the other, the latter best articulated by Peter Alexeyevich Kropotkin’s Darwinian theory of mutual aid. These frameworks were conceptualized within different scientific cultures during a contentious period both in the life sciences as well as the sociopolitical environments of Russia, Europe, and England. This cross- pollination of scientific and sociopolitical discourse contributed to competing frameworks of knowledge construction in both the natural and human sciences. I argue that the dominant theoretical framework that emerged in evolutionary sociology – what would become known as Social Darwinism – was an outcome in opposition to Socialist Darwinism rather than one that emerged through empirical evidence. The widespread rejection of Kropotkin’s Darwinian theory of mutual aid in England should be understood within this larger discursive context. As such, my project offers a reconceptualization of scientific knowledge construction by emphasizing the sociopolitical networks upon which consensus is achieved in the public sphere. This dissertation is divided into five chapters beginning with the macroscopic lens of anthropology in the context of Empire before progressing forwards in time but inwards in scope to examine the European socialists’ articulation of Darwinian science as a theory of social change, to the conflict between Social Darwinism and Socialist Darwinism, to the evolutionary mechanisms of cooperation in nature, and finally to the debate over the modes of biological inheritance. iii Lay Summary This dissertation follows the history and intellectual development of Peter Kropotkin whose scientific theory of mutual aid showed how Darwinian evolution could explain cooperation and the origin of morality. By following his journey from prince to naturalist to political radical, it reveals that Kropotkin was part of a transnational network of scientific and political thinkers whose perspective can be defined as Socialist Darwinism. Those figures that would later be defined as representing Social Darwinism originated in their opposition to Socialist Darwinism and through an ongoing debate with them. This demonstrates that political and scientific ideas about evolutionary change were influenced by each other in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. iv Preface All of the research in this dissertation was performed by the author, Eric M. Johnson. The research design was conducted by the author in consultation with his supervisor, Alexei Kojevnikov. An early chapter (not included in this dissertation but summarized in the conclusion) was published. Eric M. Johnson, “Demographics, Inequality and Entitlements in the Russian Famine of 1891,” Slavonic and East European Review 93(1), 2015, pp. 81-104. I conducted all of the statistics and wrote the manuscript. v Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………...…………………………………………iii Lay Summary……………………………………………...……………………………...iv Preface……………………………………………………………………………………..v Table of Contents…………………………………………………………...…………….vi List of Figures……………………………………………………………….…………..viii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………...……………..ix Prologue Bias in Biology…………………………………………………………….……………xiv Introduction Interpreting Darwinism………...…………………………………………...……………..1 Historiography and Kropotkin’s Science………………………………………………….5 Social Darwinism and Evolutionary Sociology………………………………………….14 Kropotkin’s Relevance to Contemporary Scientific Questions……………………….…25 Chapter Breakdowns……………………………………………………………….…….33 Sources and Research Methodology……………………………………………………..36 Chapter 1 An Ethnography of Mutual Aid: Race and Indigeneity in the Russian Far East………...40 Part I: Russian Orientalism, Ethnography, and Empire………………………….………47 Race and Ethnography in the Context of Empire………………………………………..58 Ethnography, Geography, and the German-Russian Discourse…………………….……60 Part II: Peter Kropotkin, Ethnography, and the Russian Far East ‘Zomia’………..…….67 Conclusion: Ethnography and Geosociology in Kropotkin’s Mutual Aid………….........85 Chapter 2 Evolution and Revolution: Darwinism and the Struggle for Progress…………...…..…..94 Darwinism and Rates of Evolutionary Change……………………………………..…100 Evolution and Revolution in the Jura Mountains………………….…………………...106 Proudhon, Bakunin, and the Darwinian Struggle……………….………………....…...110 Evolution, Revolution, and the Paris Commune…………………………………..……134 Conclusion: The Law of Human Progress……………………………………….……..138 Chapter 3 Social Darwinism Versus Socialist Darwinism……………………………...…………140 Fear of Socialist Revolution and the Struggle for Darwinism in Public Discourse….....143 Social Darwinism Responds to Socialist Darwinism…………………………………...154 Socialist Darwinism and the German Diaspora……………………………….………..159 Socialist Darwinism and the French Diaspora………………………………….………166 Social Darwinism versus Socialist Darwinism in England……………………………..186 Conclusion: Darwin’s Bulldog in the Gladiator’s Show………………...……………..198 vi Chapter 4 Evolution, Mutual Aid, and the Moral Sense in Transnational Context………...……...202 Sympathy and the Evolution of Darwin’s Moral Sense……………………….………..209 Sympathy and the Foundation of Mutual Aid…………………………………………..222 Social Instincts and Evolutionary Mechanisms in Transnational Context……….…….226 Mutual Aid and the Metaphorical “Struggle for Existence”………………...………….236 Processes, Mechanisms, and the Evolution of Mutual Aid………………………..…...242 Conclusion: Reorienting Socialist Darwinism………………………………………….250 Chapter 5 Darwin’s Russian Defender: Peter Kropotkin, August Weismann, and Evolutionary Epigenetics……………..…….253 Beyond the Darwinian-Lamarckian Dichotomy……………………………….…….…257 Degeneration and the Debate Over Heredity…………………………………………...259 Darwin and the “Provisional Hypothesis” of Pangenesis……………………...……….262 Entwicklungsmechanik, Epigenetics, and Preformationism……………………………266 The Development of Kropotkin’s Theory of Heredity…………………………………275 Kropotkin, Weismann, and the Inductive versus Deductive Method……………..……279 Kropotkin, Lankester, and a “Flagrant Misquotation of Records”……………………..285 Kropotkin’s Transition from Phenotypic Plasticity to Epigenetic Inheritance………....290 Preformationism versus Epigenetics and the Struggle for Eugenics…………...………296 Conclusion: The Karl Marx of Biology…………………………………….…………..305 Conclusion Biology, Ideology, and the Social Applications of Darwinism……………….………..307 Kropotkin’s Ideology versus Kropotkin’s Biology…………………………..…………309 1. Race and Racism (or Anti-Racism)………………………………………..………...319 2. Evolution or Revolution (“Punctuated Equilibrium”)……………………..….……..322 3. Malthusianism or Anti-Malthusianism…………………………………….….……..326 4. The Evolution of Morality…………………………………………………….……..330 5. Heredity (Neo-Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Epigenetic)……………………………332 6. Eugenics……………………………………………..……………………………….338 Conclusion: The Struggle for Coexistence………………………………..……………339 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………...….342 Archives……………………………………………………………………………..….375 vii List of Figures Figure 1.1 The Four “Zomias” of the Russian Far East/Inner Asia……...………….75 Figure 4.1 Six Examples of Children Crying……………………………...…….…214 Figure 5.1 Scheme of the dissection of the idioplasm of a frontal bone cell…...….271 Figure 5.2 Drawing by Kropotkin sent to Marie Goldsmith…………………...…..286 viii Acknowledgements I first encountered Kropotkin’s theory of mutual aid while pursuing a Ph.D. in Evolutionary Anthropology at Duke University. My research focused on the evolutionary mechanisms of prosocial behavior in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and I opted to enroll in the Graduate Certificate Program in the History and Philosophy of Science to brush up on my history of evolutionary theory. While rifling through dusty nineteenth-century tomes in the library, I was astounded to discover a contentious debate that mirrored so much of what was still taking place among evolutionary thinkers today. How could cooperative instincts evolve if natural selection only operates on individual reproductive success? If such a trait did emerge, how could it possibly be adaptive when confronted with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reassembling the Anarchist Critique of Technology Zachary M
    Potential, Power and Enduring Problems: Reassembling the Anarchist Critique of Technology Zachary M. Loeb* Abstract Within anarchist thought there is a current that treats a critique of technology as a central component of a broader critique of society and modernity. This tendency – which can be traced through the works of Peter Kropotkin, Rudolf Rocker, and Murray Bookchin – treats technologies as being thoroughly nested within sets of powerful social relations. Thus, it is not that technology cannot provide ‘plenty for all’ but that technology is bound up in a system where priorities other than providing plenty win out. This paper will work to reassemble the framework of this current in order to demonstrate the continuing strength of this critique. I. Faith in technological progress has provided a powerful well of optimism from which ideologies as disparate as Marxism and neoliberal capitalism have continually drawn. Indeed, the variety of machines and techniques that are grouped together under the heading “technology” often come to symbolize the tools, both * Zachary Loeb is a writer, activist, librarian, and terrible accordion player. He earned his MSIS from the University of Texas at Austin, and is currently working towards an MA in the Media, Culture, and Communications department at NYU. His research areas include the critique of technology, media refusal and resistance to technology, ethical implications of technology, as well as the intersection of library science with the STS field. 87 literally and figuratively, which a society uses to construct a modern, better, world. That technologically enhanced modern societies remain rife with inequity and oppression, while leaving a trail of toxic e-waste in their wake, is treated as an acceptable tradeoff for progress – while assurances are given that technological solutions will soon appear to solve the aforementioned troubles.
    [Show full text]
  • D'antonio, Michael Senior Thesis.Pdf
    Before the Storm German Big Business and the Rise of the NSDAP by Michael D’Antonio A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honors Degree in History with Distinction Spring 2016 © 2016 Michael D’Antonio All Rights Reserved Before the Storm German Big Business and the Rise of the NSDAP by Michael D’Antonio Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dr. James Brophy Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dr. David Shearer Committee member from the Department of History Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Dr. Barbara Settles Committee member from the Board of Senior Thesis Readers Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Michael Arnold, Ph.D. Director, University Honors Program ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This senior thesis would not have been possible without the assistance of Dr. James Brophy of the University of Delaware history department. His guidance in research, focused critique, and continued encouragement were instrumental in the project’s formation and completion. The University of Delaware Office of Undergraduate Research also deserves a special thanks, for its continued support of both this work and the work of countless other students. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliothèque De Flers Et À Divers
    BEAUSSANT LEFÈVRE Commissaires-Priseurs Bibliothèque de Flers et à divers Alain NICOLAS Expert PARIS – DROUOT – 13 JUIN 2014 Ci-dessus : Voltaire, n° 203 En couverture : Mucha - Flers, n° 168 BIBLIOTHÈQUE DE FLERS et à divers VENDREDI 13 JUIN 2014 à 14 h Par le ministère de Mes Eric BEAUSSANT et Pierre-Yves LEFÈVRE Commissaires-Priseurs associés Assistés de Michel IMBAULT BEAUSSANT LEFÈVRE Société de ventes volontaires Siren n° 443-080 338 - Agrément n° 2002-108 32, rue Drouot - 75009 PARIS Tél. : 01 47 70 40 00 - Télécopie : 01 47 70 62 40 www.beaussant-lefevre.com E-mail : [email protected] Assistés par Alain NICOLAS Expert près la Cour d’Appel de Paris Assisté de Pierre GHENO Archiviste paléographe Librairie « Les Neuf Muses » 41, Quai des Grands Augustins - 75006 Paris Tél. : 01.43.26.38.71 - Télécopie : 01.43.26.06.11 E-mail : [email protected] PARIS - DROUOT RICHELIEU - SALLE n° 7 9, rue Drouot - 75009 Paris - Tél. : 01.48.00.20.20 - Télécopie : 01.48.00.20.33 EXPOSITIONS – chez l’expert, pour les principales pièces, du 5 au 10 Juin 2014, uniquement sur rendez-vous – à l’Hôtel Drouot le Jeudi 12 Juin de 11 h à 18 h et le Vendredi 13 Juin de 11 h à 12 h Téléphone pendant l’exposition et la vente : 01 48 00 20 07 Ménestrier, n° 229 CONDITIONS DE LA VENTE Les acquéreurs paieront en sus des enchères, les frais et taxes suivants : pour les livres : 20,83 % + TVA (5,5 %) = 21,98 % TTC pour les autres lots : 20,83 % + TVA (20 %) = 25 % TTC La vente est faite expressément au comptant.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading William Morris, Peter Kropotkin, Ursula K. Le Guin, and PM in the Light of Digital Socialism
    tripleC 18(1): 146-186, 2020 http://www.triple-c.at The Utopian Internet, Computing, Communication, and Concrete Utopias: Reading William Morris, Peter Kropotkin, Ursula K. Le Guin, and P.M. in the Light of Digital Socialism Christian Fuchs University of Westminster, London, [email protected], http://fuchs.uti.at Abstract: This paper asks: What can we learn from literary communist utopias for the creation and organisation of communicative and digital socialist society and a utopian Internet? To pro- vide an answer to this question, the article discusses aspects of technology and communica- tion in utopian-communist writings and reads these literary works in the light of questions con- cerning digital technologies and 21st-century communication. The selected authors have writ- ten some of the most influential literary communist utopias. The utopias presented by these authors are the focus of the reading presented in this paper: William Morris’s (1890/1993) News from Nowhere, Peter Kropotkin’s (1892/1995) The Conquest of Bread, Ursula K. Le Guin’s (1974/2002) The Dispossessed, and P.M.’s (1983/2011; 2009; 2012) bolo’bolo and Kartoffeln und Computer (Potatoes and Computers). These works are the focus of the reading presented in this paper and are read in respect to three themes: general communism, technol- ogy and production, communication and culture. The paper recommends features of concrete utopian-communist stories that can inspire contemporary political imagination and socialist consciousness. The themes explored include the role of post-scarcity, decentralised comput- erised planning, wealth and luxury for all, beauty, creativity, education, democracy, the public sphere, everyday life, transportation, dirt, robots, automation, and communist means of com- munication (such as the “ansible”) in digital communism.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Whole World Is Our Homeland”: Anarchist Antimilitarism
    nº 24 - SEPTEMBER 2015 PACIFISTS DURING THE FIRST WORLD WAR IN DEPTH “The whole world is our homeland”: Anarchist antimilitarism Dolors Marín Historian Anarchism as a form of human liberation and as a social, cultural and economic al- ternative is an idea born from the European Illustration. It belongs to the rationalism school of thought that believes in the education of the individual as the essential tool for the transformation of society. The anarchists fight for a future society in which there is no place for the State or authoritarianism, because it is a society structured in small, self-sufficient communities with a deep respect for nature, a concept already present among the utopian socialists. A communitarian (though non necessarily an- ti-individualistic) basis that will be strengthened by the revolutionary trade unionism who uses direct action and insurrectional tactics for its vindications. On a political level, the anarchists make no distinction between goals and methods, because they consider that the fight is in itself a goal. In the anarchist denunciation of the modern state’s authoritarianism the concepts of army and war are logically present. This denunciation was ever-present in the years when workers internationalism appeared, due to the growth of modern European na- tionalisms, the independence of former American colonies and the Asian and African context. The urban proletariat and many labourers from around the world become the cannon fodder in these bloodbaths of youth and devastations of large areas of the pla- net. The workers’ protest is hence channelled through its own growing organizations (trade unions, workmen’s clubs, benefit societies, etc), with the support and the louds- peaker of abundant pacifist literature that will soon be published in clandestine book- lets or pamphlets that circulate on a hand-to-hand basis (1).
    [Show full text]
  • BANDYOPADHYAY, SEKHAR. Caste
    International Review of Social History 45 (2000), pp. 309–334 2000 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis BOOK REVIEWS FRANK, ANDRE GUNDER. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. University of California Press, Berkeley [etc.] 1998. xxix, 416 pp. $55.00; £42.00. (Paper: $19.95;£14.95.) In this book, Andre Gunder Frank first of all emphasizes the important economic role of Asia in general, and of India and China in particular, during the period of European expansion as part of a global trade network. However, his major aim is ‘‘to analyze the structure and dynamic of the whole world economic system itself and not only the European (part of the) world economic system’’. Frank starts by tracing his own intellec- tual development as part of his ever-continuing discussions with other major system thinkers such as Immanuel Wallerstein, with anthropologists like Eric Wolf, and with world historians, first and foremost William H. McNeill. Frank then presents his main thesis: since 1500 a single global economy with a worldwide division of labor and multilateral trade has existed. Asia in general and East Asia in particular were the domi- nant centers of economic power. West Europeans, and later North Americans, only took over after 1800. The period of Western dominance is now coming to an end, and the former pattern of Asian dominance is re-establishing itself. The main characteristics of the modern world economic system are discussed by referring to the work of major scholars: Alfred Crosby’s discussion of the effects of the Columbian exchange of plants and animals worldwide; William McNeill’s analysis of the global but unequal spread of infectious diseases; the importance of trade diasporas almost everywhere (as emphasized by Philip Curtin, strangely not explicitly mentioned by Frank); Sing Chew’s views on generalized ecological change – mostly deterioration – during this period.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Notes and Index.Pdf
    - NOTE rn NoI NOTES ,i I cccnt .rSarrlst i \ t:t tC. i l. cloes Preface l. J:rnres Joll, The Anarchisls,2nd etl , (C)ambridge, Nlass.: H:rn'artl llnivet'sin Press, 'i:tlike 19tt0), p viii. .r .rl istic: 2 Sinr:e the literature on this oeriod of soci:rlis( ernd cornrnunist intertrationalism is i.rlizccl immense, it is possible to rite onlr solne rcprL\r'ntJti\c titles here Julius BtaLnthal's ()eschir.hte der Internationale, 3 r'oirs (Flarlno\er: Dietz, l96l-1971 I has bccornc standarcl ' lllrl)l\ on a ccnturl of internationalisrn, though the emphasis is alrnostexclusivclr uporr politir:al . )|S [O :rnd not trade union intern:rtionalisrn. IIore sper:ifir:rllr, on the Setoncl Internatioral, sce Jarnes Joll, The Second InternatiormL, 1889-1911. rcr ed. (l-rtrrdon ancl Boston: r.hil)s, Routledge ancl Keean Paul, 197'1). On the International Federation of Trade flnions before ,11( )ln1C the rvar arrd on its post-rvar rerival. see Joh:rnn Sasst:nbach, I'inlundzuanzig Ja.lLre internationaLer Geuterksthaf tsbelDegung (Anrstcr(1arn: IrrtcrrraIionalcn C]cterlschaf tsbun- .Li aucl dcs, 1926), and Lervis Lonvin, Lobor and Inlernatiortalisrn (Ncl York: N'Iacrnillan, 1929). iltloIls, C)n the pcrst-war Labour and Socialist International, see John Ptice, Tlrc Intcrttational Labour Llouernent (London: Oxford l-iniversitl Press 19.15) On the so-callecl Trro-ancl- ;, lile, a-Half Internationzrl, scc Andr6 Donneur, Hi.stoire de I'L'nion des Pttrtis SetciaListes (tour I'Action InternationaLe (Lausanue: fl niversit6 de ClenEve, Institu t l-n ir crsi Lairc dcs FIaLrtes :;r otlet n -L,tudes Internat.ionales, 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Outcomes in Neuroscience Education: Modular Theory and Network Theory Thomas Romanchek
    Outcomes in Neuroscience Education: Modular Theory and Network Theory Thomas Romanchek A Prelude to Modular Theory and lectures of Gall, his collaborators, and his students Few can contest the complicated and interdisci- spread throughout the English-speaking world during the plinary origins of neuroscientific study, as its precise date of 19th century and fomented a number of debates about the birth is obscure. However, it is important to place the first methods employed to justify the major principles of phre- true and deliberate neuroscience studies in proper histori- nology (Yildirim & Sarikcioglu, 2004). Physiologist Jean cal context so we can fully appreciate and understand why Pierre Flourens performed experimental brain excisions topics were studied through the lens of modular theory. on pigeons and Ancient Egyptians considered the brain and its organic observed their projections to be little more than waste, instead believing consequential that the true “seat of the soul” was the heart (Chudler, n.d.). behavior to This view was replicated in early Greek and biblical texts demonstrate but represented the consolidation of personality and human that the defined character into physiological terms. Later, Hippocrates brain regions and his followers rebuked this dogma in early physiology, in phrenology instead arguing that the brain was the major control center had little experi- for the body and possessed three ventricles, each of which mental backing. Figure 2: Blausen.com staff (2014). Medical gallery of Blausen Medical 2014 [png]. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_brain#/media/File:Blausen_0102_ was responsible for a different mental faculty: imagination, These ablations, Brain_Motor&Sensory_(flipped).png reason, and memory (Chudler, n.d.).
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Lafargue the Evolution of Property from Savagery to Civilization (1890)
    Paul Lafargue The Evolution of Property from Savagery to Civilization (1890) 1 The Evolution of Property… Paul Lafargue Halaman 2 English Edition: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London 1890. Transcribed & marked up by Einde O’Callaghan for the Marxists’ Internet Archive . “The economic structure of society is the real basis on which the juridical aud political superstructure is raised, and to which definite social forms of thought correspond : in short the mode of production determines the character of the social, political, and intellectual life generally.” Karl Marx, Capital * * * * “A critical knowledge of the evolution of the idea of property would embody, in some respects, the most remarkable portion of the mental history of mankind.” Lewis H. Morgan, Ancient Society Publishers’ Preface I. Forms of Contemporaneous Property II. Primitive Communism III. Family or Consanguine Collectivism IV. Feudal Property V. Bourgeois Property The Evolution of Property… Paul Lafargue Halaman 3 Publishers’ Preface THE work of Paul Lafargue on the Evolution of Property was originally published as a series of articles, under the nom de plume of “Fergus,” in the Nouvelle Revue of Paris, edited by Madame Adam. The originality of the theory advanced, and the mass of facts quoted, were noted not only in France but in England. The Daily News and the Daily Telegraph , notably, called attention to the chapter on Primitive Communism – a chapter written in answer to Professor Huxley’s attack on Rousseau and Human Equality. The Socialdemokratische Bibliothek, Hottingen, Zurich (a series of volumes issued by the German Socialist Party), has already published a translation of the work, and as soon as the more complete English edition is out it will be used as the basis of Italian and Polish translations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperspectral Imaging of Cuttlefish Camouflage Indicates Good Color
    Hyperspectral imaging of cuttlefish camouflage indicates good color match in the eyes of fish predators Chuan-Chin Chiaoa,b,1, J. Kenneth Wickiserc, Justine J. Allena,d, Brock Genterc, and Roger T. Hanlona,e aMarine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543; bDepartment of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan 30013; cDepartment of Chemistry and Life Science, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996; and Departments of dNeuroscience and eEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912 Edited* by A. Kimball Romney, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved April 13, 2011 (received for review December 30, 2010) Camouflage is a widespread phenomenon throughout nature and hyperspectral image is typically captured by scanning the 2D an important antipredator tactic in natural selection. Many visual sensor either spectrally or spatially in the third dimension to predators have keen color perception, and thus camouflage acquire the 3D data cube of which the z axis normally represents patterns should provide some degree of color matching in addition the reflectance spectrum of the corresponding point in the scene. to other visual factors such as pattern, contrast, and texture. Camouflage is the primary defense of coleoid cephalopods Quantifying camouflage effectiveness in the eyes of the predator (octopus, squid, and cuttlefish) and their rapidly adaptable body is a challenge from the perspectives of both biology and optical patterning system is among the most sophisticated in the animal imaging technology. Here we take advantage of hyperspectral kingdom (21–23). The expression of camouflaged body patterns imaging (HSI), which records full-spectrum light data, to simulta- in cuttlefish is a visually driven behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Chekhov's Sakhalin Island De Gaulle's Visit to the USSR
    ISSN 2311-911X (print) ISSN 2313-6871 (online) The Russian Word of the Year: 2015 Chekhov's Sakhalin Island De Gaulle's Visit to the USSR QR.URFU.RU Vol. 4 | 2016 | № 4 ISSN 2311-911X (print) ISSN 2313-6871 (online) QR.URFU.RU Vol. 4 | 2016 | № 4 QUAESTIO ROSSICA Vol. 4. 2016. № 4 http://qr.urfu.ru Журнал основан в 2013 г. Established in 2013 Выходит 4 раза в год (апрель, июнь, Published 4 times a year (April, June, сентябрь, декабрь) September, December) · · Учредитель – Уральский федераль- Founded by Ural Federal University ный университет имени первого named aft er the fi rst President Президента России Б. Н. Ельцина of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (УрФУ) (UrFU) 620000, Россия, Екатеринбург, 51, Lenin Ave., 620000, Yekaterinburg, пр. Ленина, 51 Russia · · Свидетельство о регистрации Journal Registration Certifi cate ПИ № ФС77-56174 от 15.11.2013 PI № FS77-56174 as of 15.11.2013 · · «Quaestio Rossica» – рецензируемый научный “Quaestio Rossica” is a peer-reviewed aca- журнал, сферой интересов которого явля- demic journal focusing on the study of ются исследования в области культуры, ис- Russia’s culture, art, history, archaeology, lit- кусства, истории, археологии, лингвистики erature and linguistics. Th e journal aims to и литературы России. Задача журнала – рас- broaden the idea of Russian studies within ширить представления о российском гума- discourse in the humanities to encompass an нитарном дискурсе в пространстве мировой international community of scholars. Priority науки. Приоритет отдается публикациям, is given to articles that consider new histori- в которых исследуются новые исторические cal and literary sources, that observe rules of и литературные источники, выполняются academic writing and objectivity, and that требования академизма и научной объек- are characterized not only by their critical тивности, историографической полноты и approach but also their historiographic полемической направленности.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments About Wayne Price Part 1 .Wps
    Comments on “The First International and the Development of Anarchism and Marxism” by Wayne Price René Berthier This text is a commentary of the contribution of Wayne Price recently published on anarkismo.net, « The First International and the Development of Anarchism and Marxism » (http://www.anarkismo.net/article/30330) Wayne made a review of my book (among others) : Social Democracy and Anarchism in the International Workers' Association 1864-1877 (Trans. A.W. Zurbrug.) London: Anarres Editions. WAYNE PRICE: Years after the final split in the International, Errico Malatesta, a colleague of Bakunin’s, stated that both the anarchists and the Marxists “sought to make use of the International for our own party aims….We, as anarchists, relied chiefly on propaganda…while the Marxists…wanted to impose their ideas by majority strength—which was more or less fictitious…. The Italians belatedly joined the IWA as a federation (1872), even though there were sections before. Their participation in the great debates before Saint-Imier did not, it seems to me, leave an unforgettable memory. When Malatesta speaks of “we anarchists" in the International, he alludes to the “anti-authoritarian” International after St. Imier, whose working-class base had disintegrated. By saying that "We, as anarchists, relied chiefly on propaganda", he reveals the nature of the activity they were engaged in. Bakunin did not intend to engage only in "propaganda", he advocated that workers should organize themselves into trade unions ("sections of crafts"), local unions ("central sections"), etc. (See René Berthier, “Bakounine: une thorie de l’organisation”, http://monde- nouveau.net/spip.php?article583) He regarded as a priority the daily struggle for increasing wages and reducing working hours (Bakunin, “Politique de l’Internationale” [Policy of the International] http://monde-nouveau.net/spip.php?article501).
    [Show full text]