(Hemi- Half; Lepidotus- Scaled) Because I Have 2 Bands Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MARINE TANK GUIDE About the Marine Tank
HOME EDITION MARINE TANK GUIDE About the Marine Tank With almost 34,000 miles of coastline, Alaska’s intertidal zones, the shore areas exposed and covered by ocean tides, are home to a variety of plants and animals. The Anchorage Museum’s marine tank is home to Alaskan animals which live in the intertidal zone. The plants and animals in the Museum’s marine tank are collected under an Alaska Department of Fish and Game Aquatic Resource Permit during low tide at various beaches in Southcentral and Southeast Alaska. Visitors are asked not to touch the marine animals. Touching is stressful for the animals. A full- time animal care technician maintains the marine tank. Since the tank is not located next to the ocean, ocean water cannot be constantly pumped through it. This means special salt water is mixed at the Museum. The tank is also cleaned regularly. Equipment which keeps the water moving, clean, chilled to 43°F and constantly monitored. Contamination from human hands would impact the cleanliness of the water and potentially hurt the animals. A second tank is home to the Museum’s king crab, named King Louie, and black rockfish, named Sebastian. King crab and black rockfish of Alaska live in deeper waters than the intertidal zone creatures. This guide shares information about some of the Museum’s marine animals. When known, the Dena’ina word for an animal is included, recognizing the thousands of years of stewardship and knowledge of Indigeneous people of the Anchorage area and their language. The Dena’ina & Marine Species The geographically diverse Dena’ina lands span both inland and coastal areas, including Anchorage. -
Marine Invertebrate Field Guide
Marine Invertebrate Field Guide Contents ANEMONES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 AGGREGATING ANEMONE (ANTHOPLEURA ELEGANTISSIMA) ............................................................................................................................... 2 BROODING ANEMONE (EPIACTIS PROLIFERA) ................................................................................................................................................... 2 CHRISTMAS ANEMONE (URTICINA CRASSICORNIS) ............................................................................................................................................ 3 PLUMOSE ANEMONE (METRIDIUM SENILE) ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 BARNACLES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ACORN BARNACLE (BALANUS GLANDULA) ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 HAYSTACK BARNACLE (SEMIBALANUS CARIOSUS) .............................................................................................................................................. 4 CHITONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................... -
I © Copyright 2015 Kevin R. Turner
© Copyright 2015 Kevin R. Turner i Effects of fish predation on benthic communities in the San Juan Archipelago Kevin R. Turner A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Kenneth P. Sebens, Chair Megan N. Dethier Daniel E. Schindler Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Biology ii University of Washington Abstract Effects of fish predation on benthic communities in the San Juan Archipelago Kevin R. Turner Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Kenneth P. Sebens Department of Biology Predation is a strong driver of community assembly, particularly in marine systems. Rockfish and other large fishes are the dominant predators in the rocky subtidal habitats of the San Juan Archipelago in NW Washington State. Here I examine the consumptive effects of these predatory fishes, beginning with a study of rockfish diet, and following with tests of the direct influence of predation on prey species and the indirect influence on other community members. In the first chapter I conducted a study of the diet of copper rockfish. Food web models benefit from recent and local data, and in this study I compared my findings with historic diet data from the Salish Sea and other localities along the US West Coast. Additionally, non-lethal methods of diet sampling are necessary to protect depleted rockfish populations, and I successfully used gastric lavage to sample these fish. Copper rockfish from this study fed primarily on shrimp and other demersal crustaceans, and teleosts made up a very small portion of their diet. Compared to previous studies, I found much higher consumption of shrimp and much iii lower consumption of teleosts, a difference that is likely due in part to geographic or temporal differences in prey availability. -
Preliminary Mass-Balance Food Web Model of the Eastern Chukchi Sea
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-262 Preliminary Mass-balance Food Web Model of the Eastern Chukchi Sea by G. A. Whitehouse U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center December 2013 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Marine Fisheries Service's Alaska Fisheries Science Center uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. The NMFS-AFSC Technical Memorandum series of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center continues the NMFS-F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest Fisheries Center. The NMFS-NWFSC series is currently used by the Northwest Fisheries Science Center. This document should be cited as follows: Whitehouse, G. A. 2013. A preliminary mass-balance food web model of the eastern Chukchi Sea. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-262, 162 p. Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-262 Preliminary Mass-balance Food Web Model of the Eastern Chukchi Sea by G. A. Whitehouse1,2 1Alaska Fisheries Science Center 7600 Sand Point Way N.E. Seattle WA 98115 2Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean University of Washington Box 354925 Seattle WA 98195 www.afsc.noaa.gov U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Penny. S. Pritzker, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. -
Appendix 3 Marine Spcies Lists
Appendix 3 Marine Species Lists with Abundance and Habitat Notes for Provincial Helliwell Park Marine Species at “Wall” at Flora Islet and Reef Marine Species at Norris Rocks Marine Species at Toby Islet Reef Marine Species at Maude Reef, Lambert Channel Habitats and Notes of Marine Species of Helliwell Provincial Park Helliwell Provincial Park Ecosystem Based Plan – March 2001 Marine Species at wall at Flora Islet and Reef Common Name Latin Name Abundance Notes Sponges Cloud sponge Aphrocallistes vastus Abundant, only local site occurance Numerous, only local site where Chimney sponge, Boot sponge Rhabdocalyptus dawsoni numerous Numerous, only local site where Chimney sponge, Boot sponge Staurocalyptus dowlingi numerous Scallop sponges Myxilla, Mycale Orange ball sponge Tethya californiana Fairly numerous Aggregated vase sponge Polymastia pacifica One sighting Hydroids Sea Fir Abietinaria sp. Corals Orange sea pen Ptilosarcus gurneyi Numerous Orange cup coral Balanophyllia elegans Abundant Zoanthids Epizoanthus scotinus Numerous Anemones Short plumose anemone Metridium senile Fairly numerous Giant plumose anemone Metridium gigantium Fairly numerous Aggregate green anemone Anthopleura elegantissima Abundant Tube-dwelling anemone Pachycerianthus fimbriatus Abundant Fairly numerous, only local site other Crimson anemone Cribrinopsis fernaldi than Toby Islet Swimming anemone Stomphia sp. Fairly numerous Jellyfish Water jellyfish Aequoria victoria Moon jellyfish Aurelia aurita Lion's mane jellyfish Cyanea capillata Particuilarly abundant -
Urchin Rocks-NW Island Transect Study 2020
The Long-term Effect of Trampling on Rocky Intertidal Zone Communities: A Comparison of Urchin Rocks and Northwest Island, WA. A Class Project for BIOL 475, Marine Invertebrates Rosario Beach Marine Laboratory, summer 2020 Dr. David Cowles and Class 1 ABSTRACT In the summer of 2020 the Rosario Beach Marine Laboratory Marine Invertebrates class studied the intertidal community of Urchin Rocks (UR), part of Deception Pass State Park. The intertidal zone at Urchin Rocks is mainly bedrock, is easily reached, and is a very popular place for visitors to enjoy seeing the intertidal life. Visits to the Location have become so intense that Deception Pass State Park has established a walking trail and docent guides in the area in order to minimize trampling of the marine life while still allowing visitors. No documentation exists for the state of the marine community before visits became common, but an analogous Location with similar substrate exists just offshore on Northwest Island (NWI). Using a belt transect divided into 1 m2 quadrats, the class quantified the algae, barnacle, and other invertebrate components of the communities at the two locations and compared them. Algal cover at both sites increased at lower tide levels but while the cover consisted of macroalgae at NWI, at Urchin Rocks the lower intertidal algae were dominated by diatom mats instead. Barnacles were abundant at both sites but at Urchin Rocks they were even more abundant but mostly of the smallest size classes. Small barnacles were especially abundant at Urchin Rocks near where the walking trail crosses the transect. Barnacles may be benefitting from areas cleared of macroalgae by trampling but in turn not be able to grow to large size at Urchin Rocks. -
OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber ......................................................................... -
Sub-Tidal Monitoring in the OCNMS
Assessment of the Subdal Assemblages Within the Olympic Coast Naonal Marine Sanctuary Reef Environmental Educaon Foundaon Christy Paengill‐Semmens and Janna Nichols Project Overview Results The Olympic Coast Naonal Marine Sanctuary (OCNMS) covers over 3,300 square 1.60 miles of ocean off Washington State's rocky Olympic Peninsula coastline and Table 2. Species that have been reported during 371 REEF surveys in the 1.40 OCNMS, conducted between 2003 and 2008. Sighting 1.20 Sanctuary waters host abundant marine life. The Reef Environmental Educaon Common Name Scientific Name Frequency 1.00 Foundaon (REEF) iniated an annual monitoring project in 2003 to document the Kelp Greenling Hexagrammos decagrammus 97% Fish-eating Anemone Urticina piscivora 93% 0.80 status and trends of sub‐dal fish assemblages and key invertebrates. Between 2003 Orange Cup Coral Balanophyllia elegans 92% Plumose Anemone Metridium senile/farcimen 91% 0.60 and 2008: Leather Star Dermasterias imbricata 91% Sunflower Star Pycnopodia helianthoides 91% Abundance Score 0.40 Black Rockfish Sebastes melanops 89% • 371 surveys have been conducted at 13 sites within the Sanctuary Gumboot Chiton Cryptochiton stelleri 66% 0.20 REEF Advanced Assessment Team Pink Hydrocoral Stylaster verrilli/S. venustus 66% • 70 species of fish and 28 species of invertebrates have been documented and members prepare for the OCNMS White-spotted Anemone Urticina lofotensis 65% 0.00 Longfin Sculpin Jordania zonope 63% Gumboot chiton are monitored monitoring. Orange Social Ascidian Metandrocarpa taylori/dura 62% frequently sighted in the 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Lingcod Ophiodon elongatus 59% Red Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus 57% OCNMS. Photo by Steve California Sea Cucumber Gumboot Chiton Giant Barnacle Balanus nubilus 57% Lonhart. -
Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat (Efh) Amendment 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement
New England Fishery Management Council 50 WATER STREET | NEWBURYPORT, MASSACHUSETTS 01950 | PHONE 978 465 0492 | FAX 978 465 3116 E.F. “Terry” Stockwell III, Chairman | Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director OMNIBUS ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH) AMENDMENT 2 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix D: The Swept Area Seabed Impact (SASI) approach: a tool for analyzing the effects of fishing on Essential Fish Habitat Appendix D: The Swept Area Seabed Impact Approach This document was prepared by the following members of the NEFMC Habitat Plan Development team, with feedback from the NEFMC Habitat Oversight Committee, NEFMC Habitat Advisory Panel, and interested members of the public. Michelle Bachman, NEFMC staff Peter Auster, University of Connecticut Chad Demarest, NOAA/Northeast Fisheries Science Center Steve Eayrs, Gulf of Maine Research Institute Kathyrn Ford, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Jon Grabowski, Gulf of Maine Research Institute Brad Harris, University of Massachusetts School of Marine Science and Technology Tom Hoff, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council Mark Lazzari, Maine Department of Marine Resources Vincent Malkoski, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Dave Packer, NOAA/ Northeast Fisheries Science Center David Stevenson, NOAA/Northeast Regional Office Page Valentine, U.S. Geological Survey January 2011 Page 2 of 257 Appendix D: The Swept Area Seabed Impact Approach Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW OF THE SWEPT AREA SEABED IMPACT MODEL ........... 13 2.0 DEFINING HABITAT ...................................................................................... -
Methodology of the Pacific Marine Ecological Classification System and Its Application to the Northern and Southern Shelf Bioregions
Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2016/035 Pacific Region Methodology of the Pacific Marine Ecological Classification System and its Application to the Northern and Southern Shelf Bioregions Emily Rubidge1, Katie S. P. Gale1, Janelle M. R. Curtis2, Erin McClelland3, Laura Feyrer4, Karin Bodtker5, Carrie Robb5 1Institute of Ocean Sciences Fisheries & Oceans Canada P.O. Box 6000 Sidney, BC V8L 4B2 2Pacific Biological Station Fisheries & Oceans Canada 3190 Hammond Bay Rd Nanaimo, BC V9T 1K6 3EKM Scientific Consulting 4BC Ministry of Environment P.O. Box 9335 STN PROV GOVT Victoria, BC V8W 9M1 5Living Oceans Society 204-343 Railway St. Vancouver, BC V6A 1A4 May 2016 Foreword This series documents the scientific basis for the evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time frames required and the documents it contains are not intended as definitive statements on the subjects addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing investigations. Research documents are produced in the official language in which they are provided to the Secretariat. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016 ISSN 1919-5044 Correct citation for this publication: Rubidge, E., Gale, K.S.P., Curtis, J.M.R., McClelland, E., Feyrer, L., Bodtker, K., and Robb, C. 2016. Methodology of the Pacific Marine Ecological Classification System and its Application to the Northern and Southern Shelf Bioregions. -
Polartrec Lesson Resource What's on the Bottom? Piper Bartlett
4/27/2020 View PolarTREC Lesson Resource What's On the Bottom? Piper Bartlett-Browne Northern Chukchi Integrated Study PolarTREC Expedition Page https://www.polartrec.com/expeditions/northern-chukchi-integrated-study https://www.polartrec.com/print/pdf/node/46300/debug 1/7 4/27/2020 View This program is supported by the National Science Foundation under award 1918637. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed by this program are those of the PIs and coordinating team and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Janet Warburton and Judy Fahnestock Education Project Managers Arctic Research Consortium of the US (ARCUS) 3535 College Rd. Suite 101 Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 474-1600 [email protected] www.polartrec.com https://www.polartrec.com/print/pdf/node/46300/debug 3/7 4/27/2020 View Overview Resource Details This lesson plan is designed to teach students about benthic biodiversity in the Arctic by analyzing data from the Distributed Biological Observatory (DBO). Although you can’t see them from Region the surface, the organisms found on the ocean floor are Arctic important indicators of ecosystem health and provide information about productivity. Students will explore sites throughout the Bering and Chukchi Seas using video taken aboard the Sir Completion Time Wilfred Laurier research vessel, which is operated by the About a week Canadian Coast Guard. Objectives Grade High school and Up 1. Students will be able to map the DBO data sites using latitude and longitude. Permission 2. Students will identify, count, and measure benthic organisms at the different DBO sites. -
Ecological Assessment of Sublittoral Plant Communities in the Northern Gulf of Alaska
ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF SUBLITTORAL PLANT COMMUNITIES IN THE NORTHERN GULF OF ALASKA by R. J. Rosenthal, D. C. Lees, and T. M. Rosenthal Dames & Moore 510 L Street, Suite 310 Anchorage Alaska 99501 Final Report Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit 78 September 1977 313 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES . ● . ● . 317 LIST OF TABLES . ✎ . ✎ ● . 319 INTRODUCTION . ● ● . ✎ . ● ● . ✎ ✎ . 323 GENERAL STUDY OBJEC- VES . ✎ ✎ ● ✎ ● ✎ ● ● ● ✎ . ● . ● 325 ✎ METHODS . ● . ✎ ✎ ✎ ● ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ● . ✎ ● . 326 THE MARINE PLANT COMMUNITY ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ 328 RESULTS. ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ 331 Description of the Study Site (Latouche Point) ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ 331 Biological Setting (Algal Assemblage) . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ● . ✎ 334 Epifauna and Trophic Interaction “. ● . ● ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ 360 Seasonal Patterns . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ● ● ✎ 379 Description of the Study Site (Zaikof Bay) ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 387 Biological Setting (Algal Assemblage) . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 389 Epifauna and Trophic Interaction . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 406 Seasonal Patterns . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 419 Description of the Study Site (Macleod Harbor) ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 422 Biological Setting (Algal Assemblage) . ✎ ● . ● ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 424 Epifauna and Trophic Interaction . ● ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 443 Soft Bottom and Faunal Components . ✎ ✎ , ● ● ✎ ✎ ✎ 451 DISCUSSION . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 452 LITERATURE CITED . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 458 315 LIST OF FIGURES figure Page 1. Location of study sites in northeastern Gulf of Alaska . 324 2. Study site and subtidal vegetative canopies at Latouche