Sub-Tidal Monitoring in the OCNMS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sub-Tidal Monitoring in the OCNMS Assessment of the Subdal Assemblages Within the Olympic Coast Naonal Marine Sanctuary Reef Environmental Educaon Foundaon Christy Paengill‐Semmens and Janna Nichols Project Overview Results The Olympic Coast Naonal Marine Sanctuary (OCNMS) covers over 3,300 square 1.60 miles of ocean off Washington State's rocky Olympic Peninsula coastline and Table 2. Species that have been reported during 371 REEF surveys in the 1.40 OCNMS, conducted between 2003 and 2008. Sighting 1.20 Sanctuary waters host abundant marine life. The Reef Environmental Educaon Common Name Scientific Name Frequency 1.00 Foundaon (REEF) iniated an annual monitoring project in 2003 to document the Kelp Greenling Hexagrammos decagrammus 97% Fish-eating Anemone Urticina piscivora 93% 0.80 status and trends of sub‐dal fish assemblages and key invertebrates. Between 2003 Orange Cup Coral Balanophyllia elegans 92% Plumose Anemone Metridium senile/farcimen 91% 0.60 and 2008: Leather Star Dermasterias imbricata 91% Sunflower Star Pycnopodia helianthoides 91% Abundance Score 0.40 Black Rockfish Sebastes melanops 89% • 371 surveys have been conducted at 13 sites within the Sanctuary Gumboot Chiton Cryptochiton stelleri 66% 0.20 REEF Advanced Assessment Team Pink Hydrocoral Stylaster verrilli/S. venustus 66% • 70 species of fish and 28 species of invertebrates have been documented and members prepare for the OCNMS White-spotted Anemone Urticina lofotensis 65% 0.00 Longfin Sculpin Jordania zonope 63% Gumboot chiton are monitored monitoring. Orange Social Ascidian Metandrocarpa taylori/dura 62% frequently sighted in the 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Lingcod Ophiodon elongatus 59% Red Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus 57% OCNMS. Photo by Steve California Sea Cucumber Gumboot Chiton Giant Barnacle Balanus nubilus 57% Lonhart. Methods Leafy Hornmouth Ceratastoma foliatum 55% Red Sea Urchin Rock Scallop Striped Seaperch Embiotoca lateralis 55% ‐ Monitoring was conducted by Advanced Assessment Team REEF Experts Rock Scallop Crassedoma giganteum 55% 3.50 China Rockfish Sebastes neblosus 53% Juvenile (YOY) Rockfish Sp. 48% 3.00 ‐ Surveys were conducted as part of a 5‐day project held each August. California Sea Cucumber Parastichopus californicus 46% Yellow Margin Dorid Cadlina luteomarginata 43% 2.50 Red Irish Lord Hemilepidotus hemilepidotus 42% Scalyhead Sculpin Artedius harringtoni 40% 2.00 ‐ During each monitoring event, the team conducted an average of 62 Orange Sea Cucumber Cucumaria miniata 39% Quillback Rockfish Sebastes maliger 37% 1.50 Roving Diver Technique (RDT; Schmi and Sullivan 1996) surveys. White-lined Dirona Dirona albolineata 35% Fringed Tube Worm Dodecaceria fewkesi 30% 1.00 Cabezon Scorpaenichthys marmoratus 26% Abundance Score Oregon Triton Fusitriton oregonensis 25% 0.50 ‐The RDT is a non‐point survey method, divers move freely about a Coonstripe Shrimp Pandalus danae/P. gurneyi 24% Blue Rockfish Sebastes mystinus 22% 0.00 defined survey area. All posively idenfied fish species are recorded and Opalescent Nudibranch Hermissenda crassicornis 21% A Cabezon blending in. Yellowtail Rockfish Sebastes flavidus 20% Photo by Chris Grossman. 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 REEF Advanced Assessment an esmate of abundance is assigned: Single (1), Few (2‐10), Many Mosshead Warbonnet Chirolophis nugator 17% Spiny Pink Star Pisaster brevispinus 16% Cabezon Lingcod kelp Greenling Team member Doug Biffard (11‐100), and Abundant (> 100). 43 key invertebrates are also monitored. Lacy Bryozoan Phidolopora labiata 16% observes a Red Irish Lord in the Green Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis 15% Copper Rockfish Sebastes caurinus 13% 100% ONCMS. Photo by Pete Naylor. ‐ A weighted Abundance Score is calculated as Sighng Frequency (%) * Spinynose Sculpin Asemichthys taylori 11% Shiny Orange Sea Squirt Cnemidocarpa finmarkiensis 10% Density Score, where Density Score is: Manacled Sculpin Synchirus gilli 9% 80% Puget Sound Rockfish Sebastes emphaeus 9% [(nSx1)+(nFx2)+(nMx3)+(nAx4)] / (nS + nF + nM + nA), where n is the Canary Rockfish Sebastes pinniger 9% Giant Pacific Octopus Octopus dofleini 8% 60% number of mes each abundance category was assigned. Longfin Gunnel Pholis clemensi 7% Tiger Rockfish Sebastes nigrocinctus 6% 40% Buffalo Sculpin Enophrys bison 6% Northern Feather Duster Worm Eudistylia vancouveri 6% Wolf-Eel Anarrhichthys ocellatus 5% Tiger and China rockfish Sighng Frequency 20% Study Area and Survey Effort Northern Abalone Haliotis kamtschatkana 5% Grunt Sculpin Rhamphocottus richardsoni 5% hide in a crevice. Photo by 0% Table 1. REEF survey effort within the Olympic Coast NMS. Decorated Warbonnet Chirolophis decoratus 4% Rhoda Green. Orange Sea Pen Ptilosarcus gurneyi 4% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Blackeye Goby Coryphopterus nicholsi 4% Northern Kelp Crab Pugettia producta 3% Black Rockfish Blue Rockfish Box Canyon 6 6 6 6 6 9 Kelp Surfperch Brachyistius frenatus 3% Vermilion Rockfish Sebastes miniatus 3% China Rockfish Quillback Rockfish Chibahdehl Rocks 6 7 6 6 6 8 Whitespotted Greenling Hexagrammos stelleri 2% Lewis's Moonsnail Euspira lewisii 2% Janna's Joy 0 5 6 6 6 8 Painted Greenling Oxylebius pictus 2% Rosylip Sculpin Ascelichthys rhodorus 2% Figure 2. Trends of key fish and invertebrate species based on koitlah Point 6 6 6 6 6 8 Tube-Snout Aulorhynchus flavidus 2% Smoothhead Sculpin Artedius fenestralis 2% data collected during REEF’s annual monitoring within the kydikabbit Point 0 6 0 0 0 0 Sharpnose Sculpin Clinocottus acuticeps 2% OCNMS. Survey effort and locaons are shown in Table 1. Sea Blubber Cyanea capillata 1% Mushroom Rock 7 6 6 6 5 8 Brown Irish Lord Hemilepidotus spinosus 1% Strawberry Anemone Corynactis californica 1% Puffin Point 6 0 0 0 0 0 Red Rock Crab Cancer productus 1% Crescent Gunnel Pholis laeta 1% Skagway Rocks 7 0 6 0 6 8 Speckled Sanddab Citharicthys stigmaeus 1% Acknowledgements Slant Rock 7 6 6 6 6 8 C-O Sole Pleuronichthys coenosus 1% REEF greatly appreciates the financial and logiscal support provided by the Yelloweye Rockfish Sebastes ruberrimus 1% OCNMS, the Naonal Marine Sanctuary Program, The Russell Family Foundaon, Sailfin Sculpin Nautichthys oculofasciatus 1% Figure 1. Map showing locaons where Tatoosh Island East 0 3 5 6 6 0 Widow Rockfish Sebastes entomelas 1% the Sustainable Path Foundaon and the Washington Scuba Alliance. A big thank Shiner Surfperch Cymatogaster aggregata 1% you is extended to the dozens of volunteers who parcipated in the monitoring REEF surveys have been conducted Tatoosh Island So. 4 0 6 6 6 0 Lobefin Snailfish Liparis greeni 1% between 2003‐2008 as part of an Warm House Beach 7 6 6 6 6 8 Padded Sculpin Artedius fenestralis 1% events and to the dive operators who provided field support. Guidance and Striped Kelpfish Gibbonsia metzi 1% support from Ed Bowlby and Carol Bernthal are also appreciated. annual monitoring project. Third Beach 6 12 0 0 0 9 Moon Jelly Aurelia aurita/labiata 1% Dusky Rockfish Sebastes ciliatus 1% Christy Paengill‐Semmens, REEF Director of Science – [email protected] TOTAL 62 63 59 54 59 74 Pile Perch Rhacochilus vacca 1% Pacific Sandlance Ammodytes hexapterus 1% Janna Nichols, REEF Instructor ‐‐ [email protected] Why Use Volunteers? Effecve management of coastal marine ecosystems requires informaon on The Reef Environmental Educaon Foundaon (REEF) Volunteer Survey Project is a Volunteer Survey Project volunteer divers use the Roving Diver the distribuons, abundances and trends of organisms. However, field program that enables volunteer divers and snorkelers to collect fish sighng Technique (RDT; Schmi & Sullivan 1996). sciensts are oen too few and too lile funding is available for large‐scale informaon during recreaonal dives. The project started in 1993 in Florida and has • Swim freely around dive site, dive mes vary data collecon programs. Volunteer data collecon, or cizen science, expanded to include all coastal areas of North and Central America, the Caribbean and according to depth and condions provides a valuable alternave for sciensts and resource agencies needing Hawaii. The Project provides a standardized survey method, data management • Record all species posively idenfied system, and Internet summary reporng. informaon but lacking sufficient resources to gather it. In addion, Access to the REEF Database • Esmate relave abundance for each species involvement leads to greater awareness by the public and creates a Single (S) ‐1 stewardship ethic among key user groups. Custom data summary Few (F) ‐ 2‐10 reports can be generated REEF volunteers confer Many (M) ‐ 11‐100 through the REEF Website about sighngs aer a Abundant (A) ‐ >100 dive. (www.REEF.org). • At the conclusion of each dive, the species Detailed Raw data files can data, survey me, depth, temperature and other be provided upon request. environmental informaon are transferred to REEF via online data entry (paper scanforms also The REEF Database available). • Quality control programs are run prior to A volunteer conducng a topped 120,000 REEF Survey. Photo by Pete surveys in 2008. entry into REEF’s database. Naylor. .
Recommended publications
  • California Saltwater Sport Fishing Regulations
    2017–2018 CALIFORNIA SALTWATER SPORT FISHING REGULATIONS For Ocean Sport Fishing in California Effective March 1, 2017 through February 28, 2018 13 2017–2018 CALIFORNIA SALTWATER SPORT FISHING REGULATIONS Groundfish Regulation Tables Contents What’s New for 2017? ............................................................. 4 24 License Information ................................................................ 5 Sport Fishing License Fees ..................................................... 8 Keeping Up With In-Season Groundfish Regulation Changes .... 11 Map of Groundfish Management Areas ...................................12 Summaries of Recreational Groundfish Regulations ..................13 General Provisions and Definitions ......................................... 20 General Ocean Fishing Regulations ��������������������������������������� 24 Fin Fish — General ................................................................ 24 General Ocean Fishing Fin Fish — Minimum Size Limits, Bag and Possession Limits, and Seasons ......................................................... 24 Fin Fish—Gear Restrictions ................................................... 33 Invertebrates ........................................................................ 34 34 Mollusks ............................................................................34 Crustaceans .......................................................................36 Non-commercial Use of Marine Plants .................................... 38 Marine Protected Areas and Other
    [Show full text]
  • I © Copyright 2015 Kevin R. Turner
    © Copyright 2015 Kevin R. Turner i Effects of fish predation on benthic communities in the San Juan Archipelago Kevin R. Turner A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Kenneth P. Sebens, Chair Megan N. Dethier Daniel E. Schindler Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Biology ii University of Washington Abstract Effects of fish predation on benthic communities in the San Juan Archipelago Kevin R. Turner Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Kenneth P. Sebens Department of Biology Predation is a strong driver of community assembly, particularly in marine systems. Rockfish and other large fishes are the dominant predators in the rocky subtidal habitats of the San Juan Archipelago in NW Washington State. Here I examine the consumptive effects of these predatory fishes, beginning with a study of rockfish diet, and following with tests of the direct influence of predation on prey species and the indirect influence on other community members. In the first chapter I conducted a study of the diet of copper rockfish. Food web models benefit from recent and local data, and in this study I compared my findings with historic diet data from the Salish Sea and other localities along the US West Coast. Additionally, non-lethal methods of diet sampling are necessary to protect depleted rockfish populations, and I successfully used gastric lavage to sample these fish. Copper rockfish from this study fed primarily on shrimp and other demersal crustaceans, and teleosts made up a very small portion of their diet. Compared to previous studies, I found much higher consumption of shrimp and much iii lower consumption of teleosts, a difference that is likely due in part to geographic or temporal differences in prey availability.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 Marine Spcies Lists
    Appendix 3 Marine Species Lists with Abundance and Habitat Notes for Provincial Helliwell Park Marine Species at “Wall” at Flora Islet and Reef Marine Species at Norris Rocks Marine Species at Toby Islet Reef Marine Species at Maude Reef, Lambert Channel Habitats and Notes of Marine Species of Helliwell Provincial Park Helliwell Provincial Park Ecosystem Based Plan – March 2001 Marine Species at wall at Flora Islet and Reef Common Name Latin Name Abundance Notes Sponges Cloud sponge Aphrocallistes vastus Abundant, only local site occurance Numerous, only local site where Chimney sponge, Boot sponge Rhabdocalyptus dawsoni numerous Numerous, only local site where Chimney sponge, Boot sponge Staurocalyptus dowlingi numerous Scallop sponges Myxilla, Mycale Orange ball sponge Tethya californiana Fairly numerous Aggregated vase sponge Polymastia pacifica One sighting Hydroids Sea Fir Abietinaria sp. Corals Orange sea pen Ptilosarcus gurneyi Numerous Orange cup coral Balanophyllia elegans Abundant Zoanthids Epizoanthus scotinus Numerous Anemones Short plumose anemone Metridium senile Fairly numerous Giant plumose anemone Metridium gigantium Fairly numerous Aggregate green anemone Anthopleura elegantissima Abundant Tube-dwelling anemone Pachycerianthus fimbriatus Abundant Fairly numerous, only local site other Crimson anemone Cribrinopsis fernaldi than Toby Islet Swimming anemone Stomphia sp. Fairly numerous Jellyfish Water jellyfish Aequoria victoria Moon jellyfish Aurelia aurita Lion's mane jellyfish Cyanea capillata Particuilarly abundant
    [Show full text]
  • Urchin Rocks-NW Island Transect Study 2020
    The Long-term Effect of Trampling on Rocky Intertidal Zone Communities: A Comparison of Urchin Rocks and Northwest Island, WA. A Class Project for BIOL 475, Marine Invertebrates Rosario Beach Marine Laboratory, summer 2020 Dr. David Cowles and Class 1 ABSTRACT In the summer of 2020 the Rosario Beach Marine Laboratory Marine Invertebrates class studied the intertidal community of Urchin Rocks (UR), part of Deception Pass State Park. The intertidal zone at Urchin Rocks is mainly bedrock, is easily reached, and is a very popular place for visitors to enjoy seeing the intertidal life. Visits to the Location have become so intense that Deception Pass State Park has established a walking trail and docent guides in the area in order to minimize trampling of the marine life while still allowing visitors. No documentation exists for the state of the marine community before visits became common, but an analogous Location with similar substrate exists just offshore on Northwest Island (NWI). Using a belt transect divided into 1 m2 quadrats, the class quantified the algae, barnacle, and other invertebrate components of the communities at the two locations and compared them. Algal cover at both sites increased at lower tide levels but while the cover consisted of macroalgae at NWI, at Urchin Rocks the lower intertidal algae were dominated by diatom mats instead. Barnacles were abundant at both sites but at Urchin Rocks they were even more abundant but mostly of the smallest size classes. Small barnacles were especially abundant at Urchin Rocks near where the walking trail crosses the transect. Barnacles may be benefitting from areas cleared of macroalgae by trampling but in turn not be able to grow to large size at Urchin Rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography [email protected] [email protected] Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love [email protected] Marine Science Institute [email protected] Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder [email protected] [email protected] Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]
  • IAN Symbol Library Catalog
    Overview The IAN symbol libraries currently contain 2976 custom made vector symbols The Libraries Include designed specifically for enhancing science communication skills. Download the complete set or create a custom packaged version. 2976 science/ecology symbols Our aim is to make them a standard resource for scientists, resource managers, 55 albums in 6 categories community groups, and environmentalists worldwide. Easily create diagrammatic representations of complex processes with minimal graphical skills. Currently Vector (SVG & AI) versions downloaded by 91068 users in 245 countries and 50 U.S. states. Raster (PNG) version The IAN Symbol Libraries are provided completely cost and royalty free. Please acknowledge as: Symbols courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols/). Acknowledgements The IAN symbol libraries have been developed by many contributors: Adrian Jones, Alexandra Fries, Amber O'Reilly, Brianne Walsh, Caroline Donovan, Catherine Collier, Catherine Ward, Charlene Afu, Chip Chenery, Christine Thurber, Claire Sbardella, Diana Kleine, Dieter Tracey, Dvorak, Dylan Taillie, Emily Nastase, Ian Hewson, Jamie Testa, Jan Tilden, Jane Hawkey, Jane Thomas, Jason C. Fisher, Joanna Woerner, Kate Boicourt, Kate Moore, Kate Petersen, Kim Kraeer, Kris Beckert, Lana Heydon, Lucy Van Essen-Fishman, Madeline Kelsey, Nicole Lehmer, Sally Bell, Sander Scheffers, Sara Klips, Tim Carruthers, Tina Kister , Tori Agnew, Tracey Saxby, Trisann Bambico. From a variety of institutions, agencies, and companies: Chesapeake
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology of the Pacific Marine Ecological Classification System and Its Application to the Northern and Southern Shelf Bioregions
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2016/035 Pacific Region Methodology of the Pacific Marine Ecological Classification System and its Application to the Northern and Southern Shelf Bioregions Emily Rubidge1, Katie S. P. Gale1, Janelle M. R. Curtis2, Erin McClelland3, Laura Feyrer4, Karin Bodtker5, Carrie Robb5 1Institute of Ocean Sciences Fisheries & Oceans Canada P.O. Box 6000 Sidney, BC V8L 4B2 2Pacific Biological Station Fisheries & Oceans Canada 3190 Hammond Bay Rd Nanaimo, BC V9T 1K6 3EKM Scientific Consulting 4BC Ministry of Environment P.O. Box 9335 STN PROV GOVT Victoria, BC V8W 9M1 5Living Oceans Society 204-343 Railway St. Vancouver, BC V6A 1A4 May 2016 Foreword This series documents the scientific basis for the evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time frames required and the documents it contains are not intended as definitive statements on the subjects addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing investigations. Research documents are produced in the official language in which they are provided to the Secretariat. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016 ISSN 1919-5044 Correct citation for this publication: Rubidge, E., Gale, K.S.P., Curtis, J.M.R., McClelland, E., Feyrer, L., Bodtker, K., and Robb, C. 2016. Methodology of the Pacific Marine Ecological Classification System and its Application to the Northern and Southern Shelf Bioregions.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hemi- Half; Lepidotus- Scaled) Because I Have 2 Bands Of
    1) Hemilepidotus hemilepidotus • My name means “half-scaled” (hemi- half; lepidotus- scaled) because I have 2 bands of scales instead of being completely scaled • I am a part of the sculpin order but everyone forgets because I look a little different • I blend in to my surroundings with my red, brown, and green spots and can usually be found lurking under rocks 2) Pisaster ochraceus • My species name refers to one of my color morphs, ochre, but I can also be purple • I have short white spines that stick out of my 5 arms that move by water power • I am such an important species that researchers call me a “keystone species” because I eat so many mussels 3) Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis • My scientific name Strongylocentrotus means “ball of spines” • I move using purple tube feet and like to eat kelp • Sometimes my color is dark and I get mistake for my purple relative, but normally I am green in color 4) Sebastes nebulosus • My scientific name Sebastes means “magnificent” and nebulosus means “clouded” • I am a part of a group of fish that can live to be very old and don’t like to leave my home area • I am usually black with a yellow strips and spots on my body 5) Hexagrammos decagrammus • My scientific name is a little confusing: it means “6 line” and “10 line” referring to my number of lateral lines. I have 5 lateral lines on each side of my body (but my name says 6 on each side but 10 total). • I can be many colors depending on my gender but as a male I am usually blue with brown, blue, and white spots • I like to guard my territory
    [Show full text]
  • Kane-Higham-2012.Pdf
    G Model ZOOL-25301; No. of Pages 10 ARTICLE IN PRESS Zoology xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Zoology journa l homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/zool Life in the flow lane: differences in pectoral fin morphology suggest transitions in station-holding demand across species of marine sculpin ∗ Emily A. Kane , Timothy E. Higham University of California, Riverside, Department of Biology, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Aquatic organisms exposed to high flow regimes typically exhibit adaptations to decrease overall drag Received 28 September 2011 and increase friction with the substrate. However, these adaptations have not yet been examined on a Received in revised form 27 February 2012 structural level. Sculpins (Scorpaeniformes: Cottoidea) have regionalized pectoral fins that are modified Accepted 7 March 2012 for increasing friction with the substrate, and morphological specialization varies across species. We examined body and pectoral fin morphology of 9 species to determine patterns of body and pectoral Keywords: fin specialization. Intact specimens and pectoral fins were measured, and multivariate techniques deter- Benthic fishes mined the differences among species. Cluster analysis identified 4 groups that likely represent differences Scorpaeniformes in station-holding demand, and this was supported by a discriminant function analysis. Primarily, the Flow regime high-demand group had increased peduncle depth (specialization for acceleration) and larger pectoral Functional regionalization Station-holding fins with less webbed ventral rays (specialization for mechanical gripping) compared to other groups; secondarily, the high-demand group had a greater aspect ratio and a reduced number of pectoral fin rays (specialization for lift generation) than other groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessment of Sublittoral Plant Communities in the Northern Gulf of Alaska
    ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF SUBLITTORAL PLANT COMMUNITIES IN THE NORTHERN GULF OF ALASKA by R. J. Rosenthal, D. C. Lees, and T. M. Rosenthal Dames & Moore 510 L Street, Suite 310 Anchorage Alaska 99501 Final Report Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit 78 September 1977 313 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES . ● . ● . 317 LIST OF TABLES . ✎ . ✎ ● . 319 INTRODUCTION . ● ● . ✎ . ● ● . ✎ ✎ . 323 GENERAL STUDY OBJEC- VES . ✎ ✎ ● ✎ ● ✎ ● ● ● ✎ . ● . ● 325 ✎ METHODS . ● . ✎ ✎ ✎ ● ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ● . ✎ ● . 326 THE MARINE PLANT COMMUNITY ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ 328 RESULTS. ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ 331 Description of the Study Site (Latouche Point) ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ 331 Biological Setting (Algal Assemblage) . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ● . ✎ 334 Epifauna and Trophic Interaction “. ● . ● ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ 360 Seasonal Patterns . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ● ● ✎ 379 Description of the Study Site (Zaikof Bay) ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 387 Biological Setting (Algal Assemblage) . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 389 Epifauna and Trophic Interaction . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 406 Seasonal Patterns . ✎ . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 419 Description of the Study Site (Macleod Harbor) ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 422 Biological Setting (Algal Assemblage) . ✎ ● . ● ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 424 Epifauna and Trophic Interaction . ● ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 443 Soft Bottom and Faunal Components . ✎ ✎ , ● ● ✎ ✎ ✎ 451 DISCUSSION . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 452 LITERATURE CITED . ✎ ✎ . ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ 458 315 LIST OF FIGURES figure Page 1. Location of study sites in northeastern Gulf of Alaska . 324 2. Study site and subtidal vegetative canopies at Latouche
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CWU Comparative Osteology Collection, List of Specimens
    CWU Comparative Osteology Collection, List of Specimens List updated November 2019 0-CWU-Collection-List.docx Specimens collected primarily from North American mid-continent and coastal Alaska for zooarchaeological research and teaching purposes. Curated at the Zooarchaeology Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, Central Washington University, under the direction of Dr. Pat Lubinski, [email protected]. Facility is located in Dean Hall Room 222 at CWU’s campus in Ellensburg, Washington. Numbers on right margin provide a count of complete or near-complete specimens in the collection. Specimens on loan from other institutions are not listed. There may also be a listing of mount (commercially mounted articulated skeletons), part (partial skeletons), skull (skulls), or * (in freezer but not yet processed). Vertebrate specimens in taxonomic order, then invertebrates. Taxonomy follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System online (www.itis.gov) as of June 2016 unless otherwise noted. VERTEBRATES: Phylum Chordata, Class Petromyzontida (lampreys) Order Petromyzontiformes Family Petromyzontidae: Pacific lamprey ............................................................. Entosphenus tridentatus.................................... 1 Phylum Chordata, Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fishes) unidentified shark teeth ........................................................ ........................................................................... 3 Order Squaliformes Family Squalidae Spiny dogfish ........................................................
    [Show full text]