Consideration of Rat Impacts on Weeds Prior to Rat and Cat Eradication on Raoul Island, Kermadecs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Consideration of Rat Impacts on Weeds Prior to Rat and Cat Eradication on Raoul Island, Kermadecs West, C.J. Consideration of rat impacts on weeds priorIsland to rat and invasives: cat eradication on eradication Raoul Island, Kermadecs and management Consideration of rat impacts on weeds prior to rat and cat eradication on Raoul Island, Kermadecs C. J. West Department of Conservation, PO Box 10-420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand. <[email protected]>. Abstract In anticipation of the planned eradication of rats (Rattus norvegicus and R. exulans) and cats (Felis catus) on Raoul Island in 2002, the exotic flora was evaluated to determine which species might become more invasive following the removal of rats. The interactions between the three mammal species targeted for eradication and the multiple weed species on the island were considered. A group of exotic species that had expanded their range vegetatively but not been observed fruiting in the presence of rats was identified. This group included grape (Vitis vinifera), shore hibiscus, fou (Hibiscus tiliaceus), rosy periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus) and airplant (Bryophyllum pinnatum). As a precaution, grape was targeted for eradication as this species would be dispersed effectively by tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae), a native honeyeater, and blackbird (Turdus merula) if it began to fruit after rats were eradicated. Grape proved difficult to control but by mid-2002 all nine known grape infestations were reduced to zero density. In 2008/2009, no grape sprouts were found during searches of all known infestation sites. Since the eradication almost all species that did not fruit when rats were present are now fruiting. Keywords: Rattus exulans; Rattus norvegicus; Felis catus; invasive weeds; Vitis vinifera INTRODUCTION Plants and animals have been introduced to many islands comm.). Raoul Island has been intermittently occupied by around the world (Abbott et al. 2000; Sax and Gaines people since C. 960 A.D. and permanently occupied since 2008; Towns et al. 2006). Raoul Island is no exception, 1937 (Sykes et al. 2000). having been colonised through human agency since the th Raoul Island, a Nature Reserve managed by the first Polynesian voyagers arrived in the 10 century AD Department of Conservation, is the northernmost (29°15’ S, (Anderson 1980). Rattus exulans Peale (Pacific rat, kiore) 177° 55’ W) and largest (2934 ha) of the Kermadec Group, were well established in the mid 1800s and were assumed situated in the South Pacific Ocean north of New Zealand to be native (MacGillivray 1854). However, they are most (Fig. 1). It is an active volcano with rugged topography, likely to have been introduced by Polynesian voyagers subject to cyclones in the summer months and occasional many centuries before (Harper and Veitch 2006). Felis heavy rain that triggers landslips. The Raoul volcano catus L.(cat) accompanied the earliest human settlers and last erupted on 17 March 2006. Forest dominated by were definitely present in 1854 (MacGillivray 1854).Rattus pohutukawa (Metrosideros kermadecensis W.R.B.Oliv.) is norvegicus Berkenhout (Norway rat) colonised Raoul the main vegetation cover. Grasses, strand vines and ferns Island after the schooner “Columbia River” was wrecked dominate coastal cliffs and the beach ridges at Denham there in September 1921 (Harper and Veitch 2006). Bay and Low Flat. Exotic plants deliberately introduced were food and Approximately 20% of the vascular plant flora is utility species such as Cordyline fruticosa (L.) Goepp. (ti endemic (Sykes et al. 2000). This comparatively low pore, ki) and Aleurites moluccana (L.) Willd. (candlenut), level of endemism is principally due to the young age of introduced by Polynesians, and a range of fruiting trees, the Raoul volcano coupled with its remoteness. The high pasture grasses, vegetables and flowering garden plants degree of disturbance associated with active volcanism introduced by European settlers (Sykes et al. 2000). Many may also be a contributing factor. Many of the endemic plant species were accidentally introduced including plant species closely resemble species endemic to the New Bidens pilosa L. (beggar’s ticks) with Polynesians, Conyza Zealand mainland and offshore islands e.g., Kermadec bonariensis (L.) Cronquist (fleabane) with early European pohutukawa, Kermadec ngaio (Myoporum kermadecense settlers (Sykes et al. 2000) and more recently, Selaginella Sykes) and Kermadec fivefinger (Pseudopanax kraussiana (Kunze) A.Braun (selaginella), first recorded kermadecensis (W.R.B.Oliv.) Philipson). Little is known in 1999 (West 2002) and Soliva sessilis Ruiz and Pav. about elements of the flora that might be now extinct as (Onehunga weed) first recorded in 2008 (David Havell pers. a result of human occupation or eruption history: pollen Fig. 1 Location of Raoul Island and location of places mentioned in the text. Pages 244-247 In: Veitch, C. R.; Clout, M. N. and Towns, D. R. (eds.). 2011. Island invasives: eradication and management. IUCN,244 Gland, Switzerland. West: Rat impacts on weeds analyses may shed some light on species turnover in this highly disturbed island ecosystem. The 2006 eruption has caused the extinction of at least one native species – Ophioglossum petiolatum Hook. (stalked adder’s tongue) – that was known from a small area in Green Lake crater that is now both under water and buried in a thick mud deposit. More than half the vascular plant flora of Raoul Island is introduced and a number of vines, trees and shrubs are transformer weeds (Pyšek et al. 2004). The majority of the introduced species are herbaceous and associated with disturbed ground along roads and open tracks, the accommodation for staff, meteorological station and abandoned rough pasture along the northern terraces of the island. There is an active surveillance programme, and this is how the selaginella and Onehunga weed were detected. Selaginella, in particular, could become a problem; however, prompt action has prevented this. Weed eradication has been a focus of management Fig. 2 Raoul Island food web from 1984–2002. Relationships on Raoul Island since 1972, with 29 species targeted for derived from published sources (Fitzgerald et al. 1991; Harper and Veitch 2006) and from observations (C.R. eradication in 1996 (West 2002). Goats were eradicated Veitch pers. comm., and pers. obs.). from Raoul Island in 1984 (Sykes and West 1996). The impact of goats on the native and exotic flora was evident both before and after they were eradicated: no exotic plant Island was constructed, based on published information species are known to have increased significantly after and observations (Fig. 2). Particular attention was paid to goats were eradicated (Parkes 1984; Sykes and West 1996). known prey and competitors of rodents and cats and those Rats and cats were eradicated from Raoul Island in 2002 organisms known to eat or disperse seeds. It was considered and 2004 respectively (Broome 2009), thus removing all that the plant eradication regime on Raoul was resourced introduced mammals. The need to identify the effect of rat sufficiently to be able to cope with any increase in the eradication on the exotic flora was considered well before abundance or range of the target species if they responded the rat eradication operation (West 2002; Sykes and West positively to rat eradication, since a key action in achieving 1996) in order to avoid unintended outcomes (Zavaleta et eradication is to detect all individuals before they produce al. 2001; Caut et al. 2009). ripe fruit/seeds (West 2002). The effect of the Pacific rat on seeds and seedlings of The list of exotic vascular plant species present on Raoul native tree species of northern New Zealand islands has Island, excluding those currently targeted for eradication been documented (Campbell and Atkinson 1999; Campbell or control of seedlings (species of historic value), was and Atkinson 2002; Towns et al. 2006). Rats were shown to reviewed to identify those that might become invasive after eat seeds and seedlings, thus depressing the populations of rats were eradicated. The eradication of goats showed that at least 11 tree species. Norway rats also have been shown the primary vegetation response was a significant increase to suppress regeneration of native tree species by eating in density and abundance of native plant species, indicating seeds and seedlings (Allen et al. 1994; Towns et al. 2006). that forest regeneration was not impaired by the majority of Rats eat many plant parts including flowers, seeds, fruits the exotic species which are herbaceous (a full list of exotic and seedlings (Atkinson and Towns 2005; Innes 2005). species can be seen in Sykes et al. 2000). Woody trees and There is no published information on impacts of rats on shrubs, vines and clonal semi-woody perennials pose the exotic plant species in New Zealand. However, the factors greatest threat to the forest communities on Raoul Island. that predispose native species to predation by rats were The primary question, therefore, was would a species, if assumed to apply to exotic species as well: seedlings of all not checked through seed or seedling predation, expand its species, and plants with fleshy fruit and/or fruit with large population to the detriment of native plant communities edible seeds were considered to be vulnerable (Towns et on the island? Many species were eliminated at this point, al. 2006). particularly light-demanding, herbaceous species. Non- Cats on Raoul Island primarily preyed upon rats, forest communities, where light-demanding weeds might particularly the Pacific rat, and secondarily upon birds, thrive, are in comparatively harsh environments (e.g., some of which are effective seed dispersers (Fitzgerald coastal cliffs, rocky ridges, heated ground in the crater, et al. 1991). Rats also prey upon some of the same seed back dunes) and have not indicated susceptibility to weed dispersing bird species, mainly introduced passerines invasion to date, with the exception of the dune slack at (Towns et al. 2006). On Raoul, the principal fruit-eating Denham Bay where airplant has spread vegetatively. and seed-dispersing bird species are tui (Prosthemadera The reproductive status and dispersal potential of the novaeseelandiae Gmelin), blackbird (Turdus merula remaining species were then considered.
Recommended publications
  • Salesforce Park Garden Guide
    Start Here! D Central Lawn Children’s Play Area Garden Guide6 Palm Garden 1 Australian Garden Start Here! D Central Lawn Salesforce Park showcases7 California over Garden 50 species of Children’s Play Area 2 Mediterraneantrees and Basin over 230 species of understory plants. 6 Palm Garden -ã ¼ÜÊ ÊăØÜ ØÊèÜãE úØƀØÊèÃJapanese Maples ¼ÃØ Ê¢ 1 Australian Garden 3 Prehistoric¢ØÕ輫ÕØÊ£ØÂÜÃã«ó«ã«Üŧ¼«¹ĆãÃÜÜ Garden 7 California Garden ¼ÜÜÜŧÊÃØãÜŧÃØ¢ã«Ã£¼ÜÜÜũF Amphitheater Garden Guide 2 Mediterranean Basin 4 Wetland Garden Main Lawn E Japanese Maples Salesforce Park showcases over 50 species of 3 Prehistoric Garden trees and over 230 species of understory plants. A Oak Meadow 8 Desert Garden F Amphitheater It also offers a robust year-round calendar of 4 Wetland Garden Main Lawn free public programs and activities, like fitness B Bamboo Grove 9 Fog Garden Desert Garden classes, concerts, and crafting classes! A Oak Meadow 8 5 Redwood Forest 10 Chilean Garden B Bamboo Grove 9 Fog Garden C Main Plaza 11 South African 10 Chilean Garden Garden 5 Redwood Forest C Main Plaza 11 South African Garden 1 Children’s Australian Play Area Garden ABOUT THE GARDENS The botanist aboard the Endeavor, Sir Joseph Banks, is credited with introducing many plants from Australia to the western world, and many This 5.4 acre park has a layered soil system that plants today bear his name. balances seismic shifting, collects and filters storm- water, and irrigates the gardens. Additionally, the soil Native to eastern Australia, Grass Trees may grow build-up and dense planting help offset the urban only 3 feet in 100 years, and mature plants can be heat island effect by lowering the air temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching the Prehistory of Norfolk Island
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2001 Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 27 (2001): 1–9. ISBN 0 7347 2305 9 Approaching the Prehistory of Norfolk Island ATHOLL ANDERSON1 AND PETER WHITE2 1 Department of Archaeology & Natural History, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia [email protected] 2 Archaeology, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. Norfolk Island, on the northeast edge of the Tasman Sea, is of volcanic origin and moderate height. A humid, forested subtropical landmass, it had a diverse range of natural resources, including some food plants such as Cyathea, forest birds such as pigeon and parrot species and substantial colonies of seabirds, notably boobies and procellariids. Its shoreline had few shellfish, but the coastal waters were rich in fish, of which Lethrinids were especially abundant. The island had no inhabitants when discovered by Europeans in A.D. 1774. It was settled by them in A.D. 1788. From the eighteenth century discovery of feral bananas and then of stone adzes, knowledge of the prehistory of Norfolk Island has developed over a very long period. Collections of stone tools seemed predominantly East Polynesian in orientation, but Melanesian sources could not be ruled out. Research on fossil bone deposits established the antiquity of the human commensal Rattus exulans as about 800 B.P. but no prehistoric settlement site was known until one was discovered in 1995 at Emily Bay during the Norfolk Island Prehistory Project. ANDERSON, ATHOLL, AND PETER WHITE, 2001a. Approaching the prehistory of Norfolk Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of the Kermadec Islands and Offshore Waters of the Kermadec Ridge: Report of a Coastal, Marine Mammal and Deep-Sea Survey (TAN1612)
    Biodiversity of the Kermadec Islands and offshore waters of the Kermadec Ridge: report of a coastal, marine mammal and deep-sea survey (TAN1612) New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 179 Clark, M.R.; Trnski, T.; Constantine, R.; Aguirre, J.D.; Barker, J.; Betty, E.; Bowden, D.A.; Connell, A.; Duffy, C.; George, S.; Hannam, S.; Liggins, L..; Middleton, C.; Mills, S.; Pallentin, A.; Riekkola, L.; Sampey, A.; Sewell, M.; Spong, K.; Stewart, A.; Stewart, R.; Struthers, C.; van Oosterom, L. ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISBN 978-1-77665-481-9 (online) ISBN 978-1-77665-482-6 (print) January 2017 Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries websites at: http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-resources/publications.aspx http://fs.fish.govt.nz go to Document library/Research reports © Crown Copyright - Ministry for Primary Industries TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Objectives: 3 1.2 Objective 1: Benthic offshore biodiversity 3 1.3 Objective 2: Marine mammal research 4 1.4 Objective 3: Coastal biodiversity and connectivity 5 2. METHODS 5 2.1 Survey area 5 2.2 Survey design 6 Offshore Biodiversity 6 Marine mammal sampling 8 Coastal survey 8 Station recording 8 2.3 Sampling operations 8 Multibeam mapping 8 Photographic transect survey 9 Fish and Invertebrate sampling 9 Plankton sampling 11 Catch processing 11 Environmental sampling 12 Marine mammal sampling 12 Dive sampling operations 12 Outreach 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Weed Control Programme on Raoul Island, Kermadec Group
    4000 in extent (Devine 1975).At Low Flat shore hibiscus is extensive in the south-western corner of the flat. In 1993 one small plant was found growing above the strand line at Coral Bay and the same plant was first seen in 1991 (Clapham 1991b). This plant may have established from seed as shore hibiscus is a common strand plant in the Pacific (Merrill 1940). What is uncertain, though, is where the seed originated from. Seedlings have only occasionally been recorded under the large stands on Raoul Island (Clapham 1991b), and seed set has not been observed. It is possible that the Coral Bay plant germinated from seed dispersed from elsewhere in the Pacific. Alternatively, the plant at Coral Bay could have established from a stem fragment washed around the coast from Denham Bay or Low Flat. However, given that all known stands are some distance from the sea, this explanation is less likely. At the start of the weed eradication programme, shore hibiscus was listed as a category A plant (Devine 1977). In 1980, Sykes noted that the plants at Low Flat and Denham Bay had not increased much and because they were only slightly increasing through vegetative layering should be accorded low priority in the eradication programme. 7.3.2 Ecology Shore hibiscus is a sprawling shrub up to 4 m tall belonging to the mallow family (Malvaceae). Leaves are densely hairy below and velvety to touch, almost circular and c. 10-30 cm diam. Yellow flowers with dark purple centres are c. 30-70 mm long.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Prehistoric Human Mobility in Polynesia Indicated by Mtdna from the Pacific Rat (Rattus Exulans͞population Mobility)
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 15145–15150, December 1998 Anthropology Patterns of prehistoric human mobility in Polynesia indicated by mtDNA from the Pacific rat (Rattus exulansypopulation mobility) E. MATISOO-SMITH*†,R.M.ROBERTS‡,G.J.IRWIN*, J. S. ALLEN*, D. PENNY§, AND D. M. LAMBERT¶ *Department of Anthropology and ‡School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, P. B. 92019 Auckland, New Zealand; and §Molecular Genetics Unit and ¶Department of Ecology, Massey University, P. B. 11222 Palmerston North, New Zealand Communicated by R. C. Green, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, October 14, 1998 (received for review July 20, 1998) ABSTRACT Human settlement of Polynesia was a major Recent genetic research focusing on Polynesian populations event in world prehistory. Despite the vastness of the distances has contributed significantly to our understanding of the covered, research suggests that prehistoric Polynesian popu- ultimate origins of this last major human migration. Studies of lations maintained spheres of continuing interaction for at globin gene variation (2) and mtDNA lineages of modern least some period of time in some regions. A low level of genetic Polynesians (3, 4) and studies of ancient DNA from Lapita- variation in ancestral Polynesian populations, genetic admix- associated skeletons (5) may indicate that some degree of ture (both prehistoric and post-European contact), and severe admixture with populations in Near Oceania occurred as more population crashes resulting from introduction of European remote biological ancestors left Southeast Asia and passed diseases make it difficult to trace prehistoric human mobility through Near Oceania. An alternative hypothesis is that the in the region by using only human genetic and morphological biological ancestors of these groups were one of a number of markers.
    [Show full text]
  • Obsidian from Macauley Island: a New Zealand Connection
    www.aucklandmuseum.com Obsidian from Macauley Island: a New Zealand connection Louise Furey Auckland War Memorial Museum Callan Ross-Sheppard McGill University, Montreal Kath E. Prickett Auckland War Memorial Museum Abstract An obsidian flake collected from Macauley Island during the Kermadec Expedition has been analysed to determine the source. The result indicates a Mayor Island, New Zealand, origin, supporting previous results on obsidian from Raoul Island that Polynesians travelled back into the Pacific from New Zealand. Keywords obsidian; Pacific colonisation; Pacific voyaging; Macauley Island. INTRODUCTION The steep terrain meant there were only a few suitable habitation places confined to flat areas of limited size on The Kermadec Islands comprise Raoul Island, the largest the south and north coasts. The only landing places were of the group, the nearby Meyer Islands and Herald adjacent to these flats. Botanical surveys have recorded Islets, and 100–155 km to the south are Macauley, the presence of Polynesian tropical cultigens including Curtis and Cheeseman iIslands, and L’Esperence Rock. candlenut (Aleurites monuccana) and ti (Cordyline Raoul is approximately 1000 km to the northeast of fruticosa) (Sykes 1977) which are not endemic to the New Zealand. During the 2011 Kermadec Expedition, island and it is assumed they were transported there by samples of naturally occurring obsidian were obtained Polynesian settlers. Polynesian tuberous vegetables such from Raoul, the Meyer Islands, and from the sea floor off as taro (Colocasia esculenta) and kumara (Ipomoea Curtis Island. These are now in the Auckland Museum batatas) were also recorded but their introduction collection. More importantly however was the single attributed to later 19th century immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Rhopalostylis Baueri SCORE:-2.0 RATING:Low Risk
    TAXON: Rhopalostylis baueri SCORE: -2.0 RATING: Low Risk Taxon: Rhopalostylis baueri Family: Arecaceae Common Name(s): Norfolk Island palm Synonym(s): Areca baueri Hook. f. ex Lem. Eora(basionym) baueri (H. Wendl. & Drude) O. F. RhopalostylisCook cheesemanii Becc. ex Cheeseman Assessor: No Assessor Status: Assessor Approved End Date: WRA Score: -2.0 Designation: L Rating: Low Risk Keywords: Subtropical Palm, Unarmed, Shade-tolerant, Thicket-forming, Bird-dispersed Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 n 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier
    [Show full text]
  • Polynesian Plant Introductions in the Southwest Pacific: Initial Pollen Evidence from Norfolk Island
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2001 Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 27 (2001): 123–134. ISBN 0 7347 2305 9 Polynesian Plant Introductions in the Southwest Pacific: Initial Pollen Evidence from Norfolk Island MIKE K. MACPHAIL, GEOFFREY S. HOPE AND ATHOLL ANDERSON Department of Archaeology & Natural History, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT. Thick organic swamp sediments, buried under land fill on Kingston Common, preserves evidence of the Norfolk Island flora and vegetation back to the middle Holocene and probably much earlier times in the Late Quaternary. These sediments provide (1) a bench mark against which the impact of humans on the flora and vegetation of a long-isolated island can be assessed and (2) a means of determining whether particular plant genera and species are introduced or native to the island. Although sediments contemporary with Polynesian occupation about 800 years ago were destroyed by European draining and cultivation of the swamp during the early nineteenth century, the pollen data indicate that New Zealand flax (Phormium tenax) was introduced to Norfolk Island by Polynesians. Other putative exotics such as Ti (Cordyline), a bull-rush (Typha orientalis) and, less certain, herbs such as the sow thistle (Sonchus oleraceus), were part of the native flora long before the earliest recorded Polynesian settlement. Wildfires have been part of the landscape ecology of Norfolk Island since at least the middle Holocene. MACPHAIL, MIKE K., GEOFFREY S. HOPE AND ATHOLL ANDERSON, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhopalostylis Sapida
    Rhopalostylis sapida COMMON NAME Nikau palm SYNONYMS None FAMILY Arecaceae AUTHORITY Rhopalostylis sapida H.Wendl. et Drude FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS No ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Monocotyledons NVS CODE RHOSAP CHROMOSOME NUMBER Whareroa Farm, Paekakariki. Apr 2011. 2n = 32 Photographer: Jeremy Rolfe CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | Not Threatened PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | Not Threatened 2004 | Not Threatened BRIEF DESCRIPTION Palm to 15m tall with a ringed trunk and 3m long erect leaves inhabiting lowland forest south to Okarito and Banks Peninsula and the Chatham Islands. Leaves with multiple narrow leaflets to 1m long closely-spaced along central stem. Flowers pinkish, in multiple spikes at the top of trunk. Fruit red. DISTRIBUTION Endemic. North Island, South Island from Marlborough Sounds and Nelson south to Okarito in the west and Banks Peninsula in the east. Also on Chatham and Pitt Islands. However Chatham Islands plants have adistinct juveniel form, larger fruits, and thicker indumentum on the fronds. HABITAT Trunk of nikau. Photographer: Wayne Bennett Primarily a species of coastal to lowland forest in the warmer parts of New Zealand. FEATURES Trunk up to 15 m, stout, covered in grey-green leaf scars, otherwise green. Crownshaft 0.6(-1) m long, dark green, smooth, bulging. Fronds up to 3 m long; leaflets to 1 m, closely set (sometimes over lapping), ascending. Spathes c.300 x 150 mm., between pink and yellow, caducous. Inflorescence shortly stalked, with many branches, 200-400 mm long. Flowers sessile, unisexual, tightly packed, lilac to pink. Males in pairs, caducous, stamens 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Island Rule and Its Application to Multiple Plant Traits
    The island rule and its application to multiple plant traits Annemieke Lona Hedi Hendriks A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecology and Biodiversity Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand 2019 ii “The larger the island of knowledge, the longer the shoreline of wonder” Ralph W. Sockman. iii iv General Abstract Aim The Island Rule refers to a continuum of body size changes where large mainland species evolve to become smaller and small species evolve to become larger on islands. Previous work focuses almost solely on animals, with virtually no previous tests of its predictions on plants. I tested for (1) reduced floral size diversity on islands, a logical corollary of the island rule and (2) evidence of the Island Rule in plant stature, leaf size and petiole length. Location Small islands surrounding New Zealand; Antipodes, Auckland, Bounty, Campbell, Chatham, Kermadec, Lord Howe, Macquarie, Norfolk, Snares, Stewart and the Three Kings. Methods I compared the morphology of 65 island endemics and their closest ‘mainland’ relative. Species pairs were identified. Differences between archipelagos located at various latitudes were also assessed. Results Floral sizes were reduced on islands relative to the ‘mainland’, consistent with predictions of the Island Rule. Plant stature, leaf size and petiole length conformed to the Island Rule, with smaller plants increasing in size, and larger plants decreasing in size. Main conclusions Results indicate that the conceptual umbrella of the Island Rule can be expanded to plants, accelerating understanding of how plant traits evolve on isolated islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Industrially Important Guttiferae and Palmae Family
    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2016; 5(6): 194-198 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 Studies on industrially important Guttiferae and JPP 2016; 5(6): 194-198 Palmae family Received: 18-05-2016 Accepted: 19-06-2016 Kembavimath M Kotraswamy Kembavimath M Kotraswamy, Irfan N Shaikh, Rajasaheb F Ankalgi, Department of Chemistry, G.S. Shamsunnisa R Ankalgi, Imran N Shaikh and Umar Farooq Bagwan Science College, Belgaum, India Abstract Irfan N Shaikh Department of Chemistry, The Garcinia mangostana seed oil contains 56.2% oleic acid and 6.4% linoleic acid. The palmitic SECAB Institute of Engineering (14.8%) and stearic acid (9.0%) are major components amongst the saturated acids with smaller amounts & Technology, Vijayapura, India of capric (0.9%), lauric (2.2%), myristic (6.6%) and arachidic (3.9%). Moreover, Phoenix sylvestris, cerita mistis, chrysalidocarpus lutescens, Washingtonia filifera and phoenix rupicola belong to palmae Rajasaheb F Ankalgi family and could be compared with the oils rich in lauric acid such as cinnamon and palm kernel oils (80- Essar Laboratories and Research 90% and 45-58% respectively). Centre, Hubli, India Keywords: Guttiferae, Palmae, fatty acid, industrially important Shamsunnisa R Ankalgi Essar Laboratories and Research 1. Introduction Centre, Hubli, India One of the important facts of plants is their diverse pool of fatty acids. The oil seeds contains Imran N Shaikh particular fatty acids with industrially important because of their characteristic properties. The Department of Chemistry, main constituent of all the oils is the fatty acids which may include saturated, monounsaturated Mahatma Gandhi PU Science and polyunsaturated fatty acid that contribute in human physiology in different ways [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Management of Kereru (Hemiphaga Novaeseelandiae)
    Monitoring and management of kereru (Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae) DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION TECHNICAL SERIES No. 15 Christine Mander, Rod Hay & Ralph Powlesland Published by Department of Conservation P.O. Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand 1 © October 1998, Department of Conservation ISSN 1172–6873 ISBN 0–478–21751–X Cataloguing-in-Publication data Mander, Christine J. Monitoring and management of kereru (Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae) / by Christine Mander, Rod Hay & Ralph Powlesland. Wellington, N.Z. : Dept. of Conservation, 1998. 1 v. ; 30 cm. (Department of Conservation technical series, 1172-6873 ; no. 15.) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 047821751X 1. New Zealand pigeon--Research. I. Hay, Rod, 1951- II. Powlesland, Ralph G. (Ralph Graham), 1952- III. Title. IV. Series: Department of Conservation technical series ; no. 15. 598.650993 20 zbn98-076230 2 CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 5 2. Kereru 7 2.1 Taxonomy 7 2.2 Appearance 7 2.3 Home range and movements 7 2.4 Diet 8 2.5 Breeding 11 3. History of decline 12 4. Review of population studies 13 5. Perceived threats 14 5.1 Predation 14 5.2 Loss and degradation of lowland forest habitat 14 5.3 Illegal hunting 15 5.4 Collisions with motor vehicles and windows 15 5.5 Harassment 15 5.6 Disturbance 15 6. The National Kereru monitoring programme 16 6.1 Objectives 16 6.2 Duties of the National Co-ordinator 16 6.3 Outputs 16 6.4 Relationships with other programmes 16 7. Key sites for monitoring 17 8. Monitoring methods 18 8.1 General points 18 8.2 Monitoring protocol 19 8.3 Preferred monitoring methods 20 8.3.1 Five-minute counts with distance estimates 20 8.3.2 Display flight monitoring from vantage points 22 8.4 Other monitoring methods 22 8.4.1 Census counts from vantage points 22 8.4.2 Transect counts 24 8.5 Options for monitoring kereru in very small forest patches 25 9.
    [Show full text]