<<

OCTOBER 21, 1984 , ,

~ - -

'.NK A BIG BINGO row BUNGLE AT < THE MIRROR

HE SIEGE of Mirror for example, has actually seen plan his lucky copy of the news­ T Group newspaper offices Marks in London last week by paper and claimed. Many go astray. d at American Express, more than a thousand readers, all under the delu­ In late September, before the 'ices giant best known sion that they had won Mirror announced its first mil­ French lionaire, two ladies (very much departure of Edmond £5,000 on bingo in the against the antitipated odds) , was not, I came down from Scotland in Banking Corporation. understand, the first brush the running for £1 million from 's new com­ Maxwell's . Neither IS had

HE SIEGE of Mirror for example, has actually seen I T Group newspaper offices his lucky copy of the news­ in London last week by paper and claimed. Many go more than a thousand astray. readers, all under the delu­ In late September, before the sion that they had won ,1irror announced its first mil­ lionaire, two ladies (very much £5,000 on bLll'gO in the against the antitipated odds) Sunday Mirror, was not, I came down from Scotland in understand, the first brush the running for £] million from Robert Maxwell's Dew com­ Maxwell's Daily Mirror. Neither pany has had with the laws succeeded in the draw for the of probability. prize but both went home with The con tract to devise the tax-free prizes of £50,000 Mirror " Millionaire" game each. Maxwell. one can imagine, was given out to J-l uddersfield was not amused. The appearance of these I' based Knightway Promotions jointly run by Yorkshireman potential Scottish rnillion­ " Peter Bulless and Roger Field­ airesses was apparently pre­ I, ing a former senior sales execu­ mature. I understand that e tive with Europrent Promotions solicitors representing .the e of Blackburn-which incident­ Daily Mirror Group, which was e ally devised both the Times concerned that its prize money t portfolio game and the Sun's budget might overrun, sent a bingo stunt. letter on September ] 2 'I'Q In the course of negotiations Knightway Promotions seeking witb the newspaper proprietors, to recover sums of £roO.DOO r· who have a budget in mind for and up to £1 million or £2 ). the total outlay on prizes, the million should the two Scots p promotion companv indicated ladies come up trumps. I, tbe odds on the timing and Fortunately for Mirror, and e extent of likely winners. perhaps Knightway, the ladies The odds against anyone won the smaller prizes on 1.1'. :t person landing a prize are suit­ It is quite likely that Knight­ w ably enormous but the chances way has taken out professional n that the newspaper itself will indemnity insurance. But is it n have to pay a prize depend on valid against this kind of thing, Is whether an outright winner, I wonder? ;0