DOCSLIB.ORG

Institutional Act on the Constitutional Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INSTITUTIONAL ACT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL Ordinance 58-1067 of 7 November 1958 (As amended by Ordinance No 59-223 of 4 February 1959, Institutional Act No 74-1101 of 26 December 1974 and Institutional Act No 95-63 of 19 January 1995) TITLE 1 ORGANISATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL Section 1 The members of the Constitutional Council other than ex officio members shall be appointed by decisions of the President of the Republic, the President of the National Assembly and the President of the Senate. The President of the Constitutional Council shall be appointed by decision of the President of the Republic. He shall be selected from among the members of the Constitutional Council, including the ex officio members. The decisions provided for by this section shall be published in the Journal officiel. Section 2 The first Constitutional Council shall consist of three members appointed for three years, three members appointed for six years and three members appointed for nine years. The President of the Republic, the Speaker of the National Assembly and the Speaker of the Senate shall each appoint one member for each of those terms. Section 3 Before taking up office, the appointed members of the Constitutional Council shall swear an oath before the President of the Republic. They shall swear that they will properly and faithfully discharge their functions, perform them fully impartially in respect for the Constitution, preserve confidentiality as to proceedings and voting, make no public statement and enter into no consultancy with respect to matters within the Council’s jurisdiction. A formal record of the sworn oath shall be made. Section 4 The functions of member of the Constitutional Council shall be incompatible with the functions of member of the Government or of the Economic and Social Council. They shall also be incompatible with the exercise of all electoral functions. Members of the Government or of the Economic and Social Council and holders of electoral office who are appointed to the Constitutional Council shall be deemed to opt in favour of the latter function unless they make a declaration to the contrary within eight days of their appointment. Members of the Constitutional Council who are appointed to the Govern- 1 ment or to the Economic and Social Council or acquire electoral office shall be Issue 2002 replaced. INSTITUTIONAL ACT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL The occupational incompatibilities with membership of Parliament shall apply in like manner to members of the Constitutional Council. Section 5 During their term of office members of the Constitutional Council may not be appointed to any public function nor, if they are civil servants, enjoy any discretionary promotion. Section 6 The President and members of the Constitutional Council shall receive an allowance of the same amount as the salary attaching to the two highest grades in State posts hors échelle. The allowance shall be reduced by one half where a member of the Constitutional Council exercises another compatible occupation. Section 7 The obligations imposed on members of the Constitutional Council to secure the independence and dignity of their function shall be determined by Decree issued by the Cabinet on a proposal from the Constitutional Council. Such obligations shall include the prohibition applying throughout members’ term of office on public statements and consultancy on all matters on which the Constitu- tional Council has given or is likely to give a decision. Section 8 Members of the Constitutional Council shall be replaced no later than eight days before their term of office expires. Section 9 A member of the Constitutional Council may resign his office by letter addressed to the Council. The replacement shall be appointed within one month following the resignation. Resignation shall take effect upon the appointment of the replacement. Section 10 The Constitutional Council shall record the automatic resignation of any member who exercises an occupation or function or an electoral office that is incompatible with membership of the Council or who does not enjoy his full civic and political rights. Such member shall be replaced within eight days. Section 11 Section 10 shall apply likewise where a member of the Constitutional Council suffers a permanent physical disability preventing him definitively from performing his duties. Section 12 Members of the Constitutional Council appointed replace members who have ceased to perform their function before the normal expiry of their term of office shall serve the remainder of the term unserved by the retiring member. On the expiry of the term, they may be appointed as members of the Constitutional Council if they have served in that capacity for less than three years. 2 Issue 2002 INSTITUTIONAL ACT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL TITLE II FUNCTIONING OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL Chapter 1 General provisions Section 13 The Constitutional Council shall meet when convened by its President or, where the President is unable to act, by its oldest member. Section 14 Decisions and opinions of the Constitutional Council shall be given by at least seven members, save in the event of force majeure recorded in the minutes. The organisation of the Constitutional Council’s Secretariat-General shall be Section 15 determined by Decree issued by the Cabinet on a proposal by the Constitutional Council. The appropriations required to finance the functioning of the Constitutional Section 16 Council shall be entered in the general budget. The President shall be authorising officer. Chapter II Declarations of constitutionality Section 17 The Prime Minister shall transmit institutional acts enacted by Parliament to the Constitutional Council. The letter transmitting them shall indicate in appropriate cases if the matter is urgent. Regulations and amendments to them adopted by one or other of the Houses of Parliament shall be transmitted to the Constitutional Council by the President of the relevant house. Section 18 Where a statute is referred to the Constitutional Council on the initiative of members of Parliament, the referral shall be made to the Council by one or more letters containing the signatures of at least sixty Deputies or sixty Senators. Where the Constitutional Council receives a referral in accordance with Article 54 or the second paragraph of Article 61 of the Constitution, it shall imme- diately inform the President of the Republic, the Prime Minister and the Presidents of the National Assembly and the Senate. The Presidents shall convey the information to the members of their respective Houses. Section 19 Constitutional review shall proceed on the basis of a report from one of the members of the Constitutional Council within the time allowed by the third paragraph of Article 61 of the Constitution. Section 20 The Constitutional Council shall give reasons for its decisions. They shall be published in the Journal officiel. Section 21 The publication of a decision of the Constitutional Council declaring that 3 a provision is not unconstitutional shall terminate the suspension of the Issue 2002 promulgation period. INSTITUTIONAL ACT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL Section 22 Where the Constitutional Council declares that a statute referred to it contains a provision that is unconstitutional and inseparable from the statute as a whole, the statute shall not be promulgated. Section 23 Where the Constitutional Council declares that a statute referred to it contains a provision that is unconstitutional but does not declare that it is inseparable from the statute as a whole, the President of the Republic may either promulgate the statute without the provision in question or ask the two Houses to proceed to a further reading. Where the Constitutional Council declares that a parliamentary regulation referred to it contains a provision that is unconstitutional, that provision may not be applied by the House that adopted it. Chapter III Review of instruments in statutory form Section 24 Where the second paragraph of Article 37 of the Constitution applies, the referral to the Constitutional Council shall be made by the Prime Minister. Section 25 The Constitutional Council shall give its decision within one month. Where the Government declares the matter to be urgent, the time allowed shall be eight days. Section 26 The Constitutional Council shall by reasoned decision declare whether the provisions referred to it are in the nature of a statute or of a regulation. Chapter IV Review to ascertain whether a matter is out of order Section 27 Where the second paragraph of Article 41 of the Constitution applies, discussion of the Bill or amendment which the Government has declared out of order shall be suspended immediately. The authority making the referral to the Constitutional Council shall forthwith inform the authority that is also empowered to act under Article 41 of the Constitution. Section 28 The Council shall give a reasoned decision within eight days. Section 29 The declaration shall be conveyed to the President of the relevant House and to the Prime Minister. Chapter V Exercise of powers of the Constitutional Council in relation to the election of the President of the Republic Section 30 The powers of the Constitutional Council in relation to the election of the President of the Republic shall be determined by the institutional act governing such elections. 4 Issue 2002 INSTITUTIONAL ACT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL Section 31 Where a referral is made to the Constitutional Council by the Government
Recommended publications
  • Lionel Jospjn

    Lionel Jospjn

    FACT SHEET N° 5: CANDIDATES' BIOGRAPHIES LIONEL JOSPJN • Lionel Jospin was born on 12 July 1937 in Meudon (Houts de Seine). The second child in a family of four, he spent his whole childhood in the Paris region, apart from a period during the occupation, and frequent holidays in the department of Tam-et-Garonne, from where his mother originated. First a teacher of French and then director of a special Ministry of Education school for adolescents with problems, his father was an activist in the SFIO (Section franr;aise de l'intemationale ouvrierej. He was a candidate in the parliamentary elections in l'lndre in the Popular Front period and, after the war, the Federal Secretary of the SFIO in Seine-et-Marne where the family lived. Lionel Jospin's mother. after being a midwife, became a nurse and school social worker. EDUCATION After his secondary education in Sevres, Paris, Meaux and then back in Paris, lionel Jospin did a year of Lettres superieures before entering the Paris lnstitut d'efudes politiquesin 1956. Awarded a scholarship, he lived at that time at the Antony cite universitaire (student hall of residence). It was during these years that he began to be actively involved in politics. Throughout this period, Lionel Jospin spent his summers working as an assistant in children's summer camps (colonies de vacances'J. He worked particularly with adolescents with problems. A good basketball player. he also devoted a considerable part of his time to playing this sport at competitive (university and other) level. After obtaining a post as a supervisor at ENSEP, Lionel Jospin left the Antony Cite universifaire and prepared the competitive entrance examination for ENA.
  • Intérieur ; Cabinet De Gaston Defferre, Ministre De L'intérieur Puis De Pierre

    Intérieur ; Cabinet De Gaston Defferre, Ministre De L'intérieur Puis De Pierre

    Intérieur ; Cabinet de Pierre Joxe, ministre de l'Intérieur. Dossiers de François Roussely, directeur de cabinet du ministre (1988-1989) Répertoire numérique du versement 19910204 Archives nationales (France) Pierrefitte-sur-Seine 1991 1 https://www.siv.archives-nationales.culture.gouv.fr/siv/IR/FRAN_IR_008128 Cet instrument de recherche a été encodé en 2010 par l'entreprise diadeis dans le cadre du chantier de dématérialisation des instruments de recherche des Archives Nationales sur la base d'une DTD conforme à la DTD EAD (encoded archival description) et créée par le service de dématérialisation des instruments de recherche des Archives Nationales 2 Archives nationales (France) Sommaire Intérieur ; Cabinet de Pierre Joxe, ministre de l'Intérieur. Dossiers de François 4 Roussely, directeur de cabinet du ministre (1988-1989) Instructions du Premier ministre 6 Administration centrale 6 Préparation du budget 1989 6 Conflits sociaux 6 Aménagement du territoire 7 Administration des territoires basque, corse, francilien et néo-calédonien 7 Pays basque 7 Corse 7 Nouvelle-Calédonie 8 Paris - Ile-de-France 9 Dossiers en lien avec la Direction des libertés publiques et des affaires juridiques 9 (DLPAJ) Dossiers en lien avec la direction générale de la police nationale 9 Dossier général 9 Affaires traitées par la DCPJ 10 Dossiers en lien avec la direction de la Sécurité civile 10 Dossiers en lien avec l'Inspection générale de l'administration (IGA) 11 Communauté européenne 11 Fonctions publiques 11 Jeux Olympiques d'hiver à Alberville 11 Relations avec le Parti socialiste 12 Réunions des directeurs généraux et des directeurs du ministère de l'Intérieur 12 3 Archives nationales (France) INTRODUCTION Référence 19910204/1-19910204/4 Niveau de description fonds Intitulé Intérieur ; Cabinet de Pierre Joxe, ministre de l'Intérieur.
  • MEDIA POLARIZATION “À LA FRANÇAISE”? Comparing the French and American Ecosystems

    MEDIA POLARIZATION “À LA FRANÇAISE”? Comparing the French and American Ecosystems

    institut montaigne MEDIA POLARIZATION “À LA FRANÇAISE”? Comparing the French and American Ecosystems REPORT MAY 2019 MEDIA POLARIZATION “À LA FRANÇAISE” MEDIA POLARIZATION There is no desire more natural than the desire for knowledge MEDIA POLARIZATION “À LA FRANÇAISE”? Comparing the French and American Ecosystems MAY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In France, representative democracy is experiencing a growing mistrust that also affects the media. The latter are facing major simultaneous challenges: • a disruption of their business model in the digital age; • a dependence on social networks and search engines to gain visibility; • increased competition due to the convergence of content on digital media (competition between text, video and audio on the Internet); • increased competition due to the emergence of actors exercising their influence independently from the media (politicians, bloggers, comedians, etc.). In the United States, these developments have contributed to the polarization of the public square, characterized by the radicalization of the conservative press, with significant impact on electoral processes. Institut Montaigne investigated whether a similar phenomenon was at work in France. To this end, it led an in-depth study in partnership with the Sciences Po Médialab, the Sciences Po School of Journalism as well as the MIT Center for Civic Media. It also benefited from data collected and analyzed by the Pew Research Center*, in their report “News Media Attitudes in France”. Going beyond “fake news” 1 The changes affecting the media space are often reduced to the study of their most visible symp- toms. For instance, the concept of “fake news”, which has been amply commented on, falls short of encompassing the complexity of the transformations at work.
  • Insular Autonomy: a Framework for Conflict Settlement? a Comparative Study of Corsica and the Åland Islands

    Insular Autonomy: a Framework for Conflict Settlement? a Comparative Study of Corsica and the Åland Islands

    INSULAR AUTONOMY: A FRAMEWORK FOR CONFLICT SETTLEMENT? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CORSICA AND THE ÅLAND ISLANDS Farimah DAFTARY ECMI Working Paper # 9 October 2000 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg . Germany % +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper # 9 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Marc Weller Issue Editors: Farimah Daftary and William McKinney © European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) 2000. ISSN 1435-9812 i The European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) is a non-partisan institution founded in 1996 by the Governments of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the German State of Schleswig-Holstein. ECMI was established in Flensburg, at the heart of the Danish-German border region, in order to draw from the encouraging example of peaceful coexistence between minorities and majorities achieved here. ECMI’s aim is to promote interdisciplinary research on issues related to minorities and majorities in a European perspective and to contribute to the improvement of inter-ethnic relations in those parts of Western and Eastern Europe where ethno- political tension and conflict prevail. ECMI Working Papers are written either by the staff of ECMI or by outside authors commissioned by the Centre. As ECMI does not propagate opinions of its own, the views expressed in any of its publications are the sole responsibility of the author concerned. ECMI Working Paper # 9 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) © ECMI 2000 CONTENTS I.
  • Mobilizing in Different Political Opportunity Structures: the Cases of French and British Muslims

    Mobilizing in Different Political Opportunity Structures: the Cases of French and British Muslims

    ASPJ Africa & Francophonie - 1st Quarter 2012 Mobilizing in Different Political Opportunity Structures The Cases of French and British Muslims IMÈNE AJALA, PHD* ssues related to Islam in the European sphere have increasingly been at the forefront of public spaces and part of decision makers’ agendas. According to the European Union (EU) Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, the EU includes at least 13 million Muslims, repre- senting 5 percent of Europeans.1 For Jocelyne Césari, “Muslim immigra- tionI to Europe and North America can be seen as the foundational moment for a new transcultural space—a space where individuals live and experience different cultural references and values that are now disconnected from national contexts and boundaries.”2 Such a transcultural space is characterized by the forceful emergence of a transnational religion (Islam) in a secularized public space (Europe).3 This situation necessarily leads to tensions; that is, Eu- ropean Muslims experience difficult relations with their respective govern- ments.4 The context of the “war on terror” since the attacks of 11 Sep- tember 2001 (9/11) and the security implied have drawn additional attention to Muslims and their claims-making in terms of economic, political, and religious rights in European countries. Muslims’ integration is considered a challenge constructed as a confrontation between religious discourses and secular spaces. Of course, national differences have different effects in terms of the conceptualization of multiculturalism, and one can distinguish among them by different “philosophies of integration.”5 * The author holds a BA in political science from the Grenoble Institute of Political Studies, Grenoble, France, as well as an MA and a PhD in international relations from the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Comparison of Constitutionalism in France and the United States, A

    Comparison of Constitutionalism in France and the United States, A

    A COMPARISON OF CONSTITUTIONALISM IN FRANCE AND THE UNITED STATES Martin A. Rogoff I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 22 If. AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM ..................... 30 A. American constitutionalism defined and described ......................................... 31 B. The Constitution as a "canonical" text ............ 33 C. The Constitution as "codification" of formative American ideals .................................. 34 D. The Constitution and national solidarity .......... 36 E. The Constitution as a voluntary social compact ... 40 F. The Constitution as an operative document ....... 42 G. The federal judiciary:guardians of the Constitution ...................................... 43 H. The legal profession and the Constitution ......... 44 I. Legal education in the United States .............. 45 III. THE CONsTrrTION IN FRANCE ...................... 46 A. French constitutional thought ..................... 46 B. The Constitution as a "contested" document ...... 60 C. The Constitution and fundamental values ......... 64 D. The Constitution and nationalsolidarity .......... 68 E. The Constitution in practice ...................... 72 1. The Conseil constitutionnel ................... 73 2. The Conseil d'ttat ........................... 75 3. The Cour de Cassation ....................... 77 F. The French judiciary ............................. 78 G. The French bar................................... 81 H. Legal education in France ........................ 81 IV. CONCLUSION ........................................
  • DECISION 2001-454 DC of 17 JANUARY 2002 Corsica Act on 20

    DECISION 2001-454 DC of 17 JANUARY 2002 Corsica Act on 20

    DECISION 2001-454 DC OF 17 JANUARY 2002 Corsica Act On 20 December 2001 the Constitutional Council received a referral from Mr Jean-Louis DEBRÉ, Mr Philippe DOUSTE-BLAZY, Mr Jean-François MATTEI, Mr Bernard ACCOYER, Ms Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Mr René ANDRÉ, Mr Philippe AUBERGER, Mr Pierre AUBRY, Mr Jean AUCLAIR, Ms Martine AURILLAC, Mr Jean BARDET, Mr Léon BERTRAND, Mr Jean-Yves BESSELAT, Mr Jean BESSON, Mr Franck BOROTRA, Mr Bruno BOURG-BROC, Mr Michel BOUVARD, Mr Philippe BRIAND, Mr Bernard BROCHAND, Mr Christian CABAL, Mr Gilles CARREZ, Ms Nicole CATALA, Mr Richard CAZENAVE, Mr Henri CHABERT, Mr Jean-Paul CHARIÉ, Mr Jean CHARROPPIN, Mr Jean-Marc CHAVANNE, Mr Olivier de CHAZEAUX, Mr François CORNUTGENTILLE, Mr Alain COUSIN, Mr Charles COVA, Mr Henri CUQ, Mr Arthur DEHAINE, Mr Patrick DELNATTE, Mr Yves DENIAUD, Mr Patrick DEVEDJIAN, Mr Guy DRUT, Mr Jean- Michel DUBERNARD, Mr Jean-Pierre DUPONT, Mr Nicolas DUPONT-AIGNAN, Mr François FILLON, Mr Roland FRANCISCI, Mr Yves FROMION, Mr Robert GALLEY, Mr Henri de GASTINES, Mr Jean de GAULLE, Mr Hervé GAYMARD, Mr Michel GIRAUD, Mr Jacques GODFRAIN, Mr Lucien GUICHON, Mr François GUILLAUME, Mr Gérard HAMEL, Mr Christian JACOB, Mr Didier JULIA, Mr Alain JUPPÉ, Mr Jacques KOSSOWSKI, Mr Robert LAMY, Mr Pierre LASBORDES, Mr Pierre LELLOUCHE, Mr Jean-Claude LEMOINE, Mr Lionnel LUCA, Mr Alain MARLEIX, Mr Jean MARSAUDON, Mr Philippe MARTIN, Mr Jacques MASDEU-ARUS, Ms Jacqueline MATHIEU-OBADIA, Mr Gilbert MEYER, Mr Jean-Claude MIGNON, Mr Pierre MORANGE, Mr Jean-Marc NUDANT, Mr Patrick OLLIER, Ms Françoise
  • Index Des Entretiens Oraux (Lieux, Thèmes, Politique Étrangère

    Index Des Entretiens Oraux (Lieux, Thèmes, Politique Étrangère

    Index des entretiens oraux (lieux, thèmes, politique étrangère, personne de Georges Pompidou) Index des lieux A Australie...................Henri Fages, Henri Froment-Meurice Auvergne..........................Olivier Guichard, Michel Jobert Afghanistan...................................Jean-Bernard Raimond Afrique. Michel Bongrand, Yvon Bourges, Daniel Droulers, B Jacques Foccart, Paul Huvelin, Michel Jobert, Jean-Louis Lucet, Pierre Moussa, Jacques Patault, Jean-Bernard Raimond, Guy de Rothschild, Michel Rougagnou, Robert Belgique......................Gérard Pruvost, Michel Rougagnou de Souza, Antoine Veil Biafra..................................................Maurice Schumann Algérie.......Jean Blancard, Alain de Boissieu, André Bord, Bretagne.......François Bloch-Lainé, Robert Galley, Jérôme Claudius Brosse, Jacques Calvet, Louis Dauge, Philippe Monod, Georges Pébereau, Olivier Philip Dechartre, Georges Dominjon, Maurice Doublet, Bernard Ésambert, Henri Fages, Jacques Foccart, René Galy- Dejean, Jean-Marcel Jeanneney, Michel Jobert, C Dominique de La Martinière, Jean-Philippe Lecat, Jean- Louis Lucet, François Maurin, Jean Méo, Pierre Messmer, Cambodge – Louis Dauge, Henri Froment-Meurice, Roland Nungesser, Michel Rougagnou, Jean-Marie Michel Jobert, Jean-Bernard Raimond Soutou, Antoine Veil, Lucien Vochel, Michel Woimant Cameroun....................................................Xavier Deniau Allemagne Berlin – Gabriel Robin Canada.................Jacques Chevallier, Maurice Schumann RDA – Gabriel Robin RFA – Jean Béliard, Henri
  • Vichy Vu Par Valéry Giscard D'estaing

    Vichy Vu Par Valéry Giscard D'estaing

    LeMonde Job: WMQ2810--0001-0 WAS LMQ2810-1 Op.: XX Rev.: 27-10-97 T.: 11:29 S.: 111,06-Cmp.:27,11, Base : LMQPAG 48Fap:99 No:0335 Lcp: 196 CMYK LE MONDE ÉCONOMIE Niveau des relations salaries-patronat a 8,22 Le patronat 7,00 européen en crise 5,02 a Immobilier : 2 pages d’annonces ALLEM. FRANCE NORVÈGE CINQUANTE-TROISIÈME ANNÉE – No 16407 – 7,50 F MARDI 28 OCTOBRE 1997 FONDATEUR : HUBERT BEUVE-MÉRY – DIRECTEUR : JEAN-MARIE COLOMBANI Vichy vu par Valéry Giscard d’Estaing Les marchés Dans un entretien au « Monde », l’ancien président, dont Maurice Papon fut le ministre, évoque boursiers ses souvenirs de l’Occupation. Il oppose la « réalité historique » à la « démarche » gaulliste asiatiques LE PROCÈS de Maurice Papon Sans l’arrivée des Alliés [...], nous ne reprendra pas, lundi 27 octo- aurions été écrasés. [...] Cela m’a et européens bre, devant la cour d’assises de la angoissé parce que j’ai vu se former, Gironde, en raison d’une prolon- immédiatement, des interprétations gation de l’hospitalisation de l’ac- inexactes de l’histoire. » rechutent cusé au minimum jusqu’à mercre- L’ancien président de la Répu- di midi. blique justifie la « démarche » du LE RÉPIT enregistré vendredi REUTERS/MAXPPP Dans un entretien accordé au général de Gaulle « affirmant à la sur les places financières asia- Monde, Valéry Giscard d’Estaing face du monde que la France se tiques aura été de courte durée. Le nouveau évoque pour la première fois ses trouvait où il se trouvait, et non à Lundi 27 octobre, la Bourse de souvenirs de la période et donne Vichy », mais il distingue cette dé- Hongkong a abandonné 5,8 %.
  • Constitution of October 4, 1958

    Constitution of October 4, 1958

    Constitution of October 4, 1958 WARNING 1° The versions in italics of articles 11, 56, 61-1, 65, 69, 71-1 and 73 of the Constitution will come into effect in the manner determined by statutes and Institutional Acts necessary for their application by virtue of the article 46 of the Constitutional Act no. 2008-724 of July 23, 2008 ; 2° The versions in italics of the title of Title XV and articles 88-1, 88-2, 88-4, 88-5, 88-6, 88-7 will come into effect upon the coming into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed on December 13, 2007 by virtue of the article 2 of the Constitutional Act no. 2008-103 of February 4, 2008 and by virtue of the article 47 of the Constitutional Act no. 2008-724 of July 23, 2008 ; 3° The two versions of article 88-5 are not applicable to accessions that result from an Intergovernmental Conference whose meeting was decided by the European Council before July 1, 2004 by virtue of article 47 of the Constitutional Act no. 2008-724 of July 23, 2008. CONTENTS PREAMBLE TITLE I - On Sovereignty (art. 2 to 4) TITLE II - The President of the Republic (art. 5 to 19) TITLE III - The Government (art. 20 to 23) TITLE IV - Parliament (art. 24 to 33) TITLE V - On Relations between Parliament and the Government (art. 34 to 51-2) TITLE VI - On Treaties and International Agreements (art. 52 to 55) TITLE VII - The Constitutional Council (art.
  • Britain and Corsica 1728-1796: Political Intervention and the Myth of Liberty

    Britain and Corsica 1728-1796: Political Intervention and the Myth of Liberty

    BRITAIN AND CORSICA 1728-1796: POLITICAL INTERVENTION AND THE MYTH OF LIBERTY Luke Paul Long A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2018 Full metadata for this thesis is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this thesis: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/13232 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence Britain and Corsica 1728-1796: Political intervention and the myth of liberty Luke Paul Long This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews September 2017 1 Contents Declarations…………………………………………………………………………….5 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………7 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………...9 Chapter 1: Britain and Corsica: the development of British opinion and policy on Corsica, 1728-1768 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………24 Historiographical debates surrounding Britain and Corsica…………………………..25 History of Corsica and Genoa up until 1720………………………………………….29 The History of Corsica 1730-1748- first British involvement………………………..31 Rousseau and Paoli: the growth in the ‘popularity’ of the Corsican cause…………...37 Catherine Macaulay’s A short sketch of a democratical form of government (1767)...45 James Boswell and his Account of Corsica (1768)…………………………………...51 Journal of a tour to that island and memoirs of Pascal Paoli…………………………...58 Conclusion: Rousseau
  • Eg Phd, Mphil, Dclinpsychol

    Eg Phd, Mphil, Dclinpsychol

    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Extending radical space? A historical comparative analysis of sub-state violent contention in Quebec and Corsica Megan Melanson A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the PhD in Canadian Studies The University of Edinburgh 2016 2 Declaration of original authorship I declare that I have composed this thesis, and the work is my own. This work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Part of this research was considered for a recent publication: “‘Limité et primitif’ : une analyse du réseau social du Front de Libération du Québec”, Le Québec recto/verso, Publifarum, n. 21. Megan Melanson 3 Table of Contents DECLARATION OF ORIGINAL AUTHORSHIP ........................................................................