<<

1

Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters/IEF-1112/pp. 1-4 Published 16 December 2019 LSID: http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C0184D2F-1565-4C49-943B-F5EBE2996A4F DOI: http://doi.org/10.23788/IEF-1112

Filling a gap on the blank distribution of the giant freshwater polylepis: first records in Malay Peninsula (: Dasyatidae)

Muhammad Iqbal*, Indra Yustian**, Arum Setiawan**, Elisa Nurnawati** and Hilda Zulkifli**

Only a small proportion of stingrays (Dasyati- oxyrhynchus and F. signifer were only dae) occurs in freshwater, and includes obligate known from five or fewer major riverine systems freshwater and euryhaline species (Last (Compagno, 2016a-b; Last et al., 2016a), though et al., 2016a). The giant freshwater stingray Uro- recent surveys yielded a single record of F. oxy- gymnus polylepis belongs to a group of species rhynchus and ten records of F. signifier in the Musi found mainly in fresh and brackish water and drainage, South Sumatra, indicating that both spe- is characterized by a large body size, report- cies are more widely distributed than previously edly attaining more than 600 kg and 2 m disc expected (Iqbal et al., 2017, 2018). In addition, diameter (Monkolprasit & Roberts, 1990; Kot- although the records of Urogymnus polylepis has telat et al., 1993). Recently, a total of 97 species increased (Iqbal & Yustian, 2016; Last et al., 2016a; of Dasyatidae has been confirmed worldwide Windusari et al., 2018), information on this spe- (Pollerspöck & Straube, 2019), including at least cies is still lacking in some regions. In this paper, 10 species which are known to enter or live per- we compiled records of occurrence of Urogymnus manently in freshwater habitats of Southeast Asia polylepis across the Malay Peninsula between 2012 [Fluvitrygon kittipongi, F. oxyrhynchus, F. signifer, and 2019. Doing so allowed us to analyze recent Hemitrygon laosensis, uarnak, Makararaja changes to the known distribution range of this chindwinensis, Urogymnus granulatus, U. polylepis, species. The records were compiled from the Inter- Pastinachus ater, and P. solocirostris] (Kottelat, 2013; net and local social media (mainly a few Facebook Last et al., 2016a). groups of local anglers); records were supported Urogymnus polylepis was first reported from by photographs or other evidence (e. g. location, freshwaters in 1990 from the Chao Phraya River in habitat type, morphology, and description from Thailand as Himantura chaophraya (Monkolprasit fishermen). We screened all records for authen- & Roberts, 1990). Information on the distribution ticity and correct species identification, so that of dasyatids is very limited in Southeast Asia, unconfirmed or ambiguous records were rejected. particularly for those species entering or occurring However, given that specimens were not directly in freshwater (Last et al., 2016a). For example, examined, and that the Malay Peninsula is known

* Conservation Biology Program, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Padang Selasa 524, Palembang, Sumatera Selatan 30129, Indonesia. E-mail: [email protected] ** Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Raya Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, Sumatera Selatan 30662, Indonesia. E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author)

Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters – ISSN 0936-9902 (print) © 2019 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany www.pfeil-verlag.de 2

5°15'N - N

4°30'N -

3°45'N -

3°00'N -

2°15'N -

1°30'N -

ı ı ı ı ı ı ı ı 101°15'E 102°00'E 102°45'E 103°30'E 104°15'E 105°00'E 105°45'E 106°30'E Fig. 1. Records of Urogymnus cf. polylepis in Malay Peninsula between 2012 and 2019. Numbers correspond to those in Table 1 (see table for detailed localities and remarks). for harbouring cryptic diversity in its biogeo- (Fig. 1). The identification of this species was graphically isolated valleys and basins, we chose based on the combination of a relatively large to refer to the species as Urogymnus cf. polylepis. size and the following morphological characters: Specimens of Urogymnus cf. polylepis were snout very broad with enlarged narrow apical recorded at seven localities of Malay Peninsula lobe; disc slightly longer than wide, coloration

Table 1. Records of Urogymnus cf. polylepis between 2012 and 2019 in Malay Peninsula waters. Records are listed form north to south. Numbers refer to localities in Figure 1.

No Site Coordinates Date Remarks Source 1 Merang, Terengganu, 05°32'03" N 23 Jul 2013 ca. 300 kg Ayahchik Penarik, Malaysia 102°56'35" E facebook account (Fig. 3) 2 Tanjung Pahang, Kuantan, 03°45'48" N 9 Mar 2019 ca. 200 kg Profishganda (2019) Malaysia 103°13'12" E 3 Tanjung Pahang, Kuantan, 03°48'45" N 11 Jun 2012 41 kg Muhammad Amilin Roslan, Malaysia 103°19'32" E facebook account (Fig. 2). 4 Kuala Rompin, Pahang, 02°49'09" N 16 Aug 2017 250 kg Anonymous (2017) Malaysia 103°29'03" E 5 Kuala Rompin, Pahang, 02°49'09" N 24 Feb 2014 ca. 100 kg Nabila (2014) Malaysia 103°29'03" E 6 Kuala Lukut, Port Dikson, 02°34'46" N 19 Nov 2017 120 kg Zakaria (2017) Malaysia 101°47'18" E 7 Kampung Johor Lama, Johor, 01°34'51" N 3 Jul 2015 150 kg Anonymous (2015) Malaysia 104°00' 57" E

Iqbal et al.: Distribution of Urogymnus polylepis 3

Fig. 2. Urogymnus cf. polylepis caught by local fishermen Fig. 3. Urogymnus cf. polylepis caught by local fishermen on 11 Jun 2012 in Tanjung Pahang, Kuantan, Malaysia on 23 July 2013 in Klang, Selangor, Malay Peninsula (photograph by Muhammad Amilin Roslan). (photograph by Ayahchik Penarik). of dorsal surface of disc uniformly brownish or individual from the Riau Province (Sumatra) at greyish brown (Fig. 2), and ventral surface with 32 kg. It is suggested that young stingrays weigh a broad black marginal band around the disk between 32 to 41 kg. We herein report the occur- (Fig. 3) [Monkolprasit & Roberts, 1990; Iqbal & rence of a very young stingray weighing 41 kg Yustian, 2016; Last et al., 2016a; Windusari et al., from the Malay Peninsula which supports the 2018]. Details of sites, coordinates, dates and other findings of Vidthayanon et al. (2016). These au- remarks are provided in Figure 1 and Table 1. thors reported large numbers of pregnant females Urogymnus cf. polylepis was recorded in the occurring in brackish waters suggesting the poten- Malay Peninsula from Merang (Terengganu) tial for estuarine habitats to be used as pupping in the north to Kampung Johor (Johor) in the grounds. Continued monitoring via citizen science southern part of Peninsula (Table 1). Records methods is urgently required to help understand of individual weights ranged from 41 to 300 kg. the ecology of this species and for future conser- Unfortunately, information on total length and vation. Moreover, it is recommended that future disc width are unavailable, as in most instances research focuses on the movement behaviour of measurements were not taken by fishermen, who Urogymnus cf. polylepis between river systems. frequently remove the tails of these rays to avoid the caudal sting. Urogymnus cf. polylepis reaches at least 2 m disc width and 5 m in total length, Acknowledgements and can possibly grow larger according to reports from the Mekong and Chao Phraya Rivers of We thank our friends in various Facebook groups who individuals weighing 500-600 kg (Monkolprasit shared information on Urogymnus cf. polylepis in Malay & Roberts, 1990; Last et al., 2016a). Peninsula. We are very grateful to Ayahchik Penarik and Muhammad Amilin Roslan for sharing us to use their To date, there have been no reports of Uro- photos. We are very grateful to Jürgen Pollerspöck, Con- gymnus cf. polylepis occurring in the Malay Peninsula nor Panter, Yopi Mainanda and anonymous reviewers (Last et al., 2016b; Vidthayanon et al., 2016) and due for their comments that helped to improve this paper. to this, the known distribution range of this species is patchy throughout mainland Southeast Asia and the Greater Sunda Islands (Sumatra, Borneo Literature cited and Java). However, new records between 2012 and 2019 presented herein fill such gap within the Anonymous. 2015. [Fisherman caught giant stingrays geographic distribution of Urogymnus cf. polylepis. in Hohor]. [in Malay]. Available from https:// Iqbal & Yustian (2016) observed young sting- www.mstar.com.my/lokal/semasa/2015/07/03/ rays occurring in waters surrounding the Malay pari-gergasi/#OK5toEgmh0oX1i0K.99 (accessed Peninsula and recorded the lowest weight of one 11 February 2019).

Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, IEF-1112 4

— 2017. [Uproar appeared ‘giant stingray’ 250 kg, Last, P. R., T. W. William, M. R. de Carvalho, B. Séret, M. fishermen sold RM700]. [in Malay]. Available F. W. Stehmann & G. J. P. Naylor. 2016a. Rays of the from https://www.projekmm.com/news/berita/ world. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, viii + 790 pp. 2017/08/16/gempar-muncul-pari-hantu-250kg- Last, P. R., G. J. P. Naylor & B. M. Manjaji-Matsumoto. nelayan-jualrm700/1443817#sthash.nmJ2b8RH. 2016b. A revised classification of the family Dasy- gbpl#quFYzJXFVhfcJ4KK.97 (accessed 11 Febru- atidae (Chondrichthyes: ) based ary 2019). on new morphological and molecular insights. Compagno, L. J. V. 2016a. Fluvitrygon oxyrhyncha. Zootaxa, 4139: 345-368. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016: Monkolprasit, S. & T. R. Roberts. 1990. Himantura chao- e.T44185A104180982. Available from http://www. phraya, a new giant freshwater stingray from Thai- iucnredlist.org/details/44185/0 (accessed 16 April land. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology, 37: 203-208. 2018). Nabila, N. 2014. [Giant stingray]. [in Malay]. Avail- — 2016b. Fluvitrygon signifer. The IUCN red list able from https://web.facebook.com/photo.php? of threatened species 2016: e.T39411A104182090. fbid=1403002349959642&set=a.1402993853293825& Available from https://www.iucnredlist.org/spe- type=3&theater (accessed 11 February 2019). cies/39411/104182090 (accessed 16 April 2018). Pollerspöck, J. & N. Straube. 2019. Shark-references. Iqbal, M. & I. Yustian. 2016. Occurrence of the giant com Version 2019. Available from https://www. freshwater stingray Urogymnus polylepis in Sumatra, shark-references.com (accessed 20 March 2019). Indonesia (Chondrichthyes: Dasyatidae). Ichthyo- Profishganda. 2019. [Use crane to lifting giant stingray]. logical Exploration of Freshwaters, 27: 333-336. [in Malay]. Available from https://web.facebook. Iqbal, M., D. Setiawan & Ajiman. 2017. Presence of com/watch/?v=1091738304331816 (accessed 2 April Fluvitrygon oxyrhynchus in Sumatra, Indonesia 2019). (Chondrichthyes: Dasyatidae). Ichthyological Ex- Vidthayanon, C., I. Baird & Z. Hogan. 2016. Urogym- ploration of Freshwaters, 28: 83-85. nus polylepis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Iqbal, M., D. Setiawan & Ajiman. 2018. New data on Species 2016: e.T195320A104292419. (accessed 16 the distribution of the endangered white-edge April 2018). Fluvitrygon signifer (Chondrich- Windusari, Y., M. Iqbal, L. Hanum, H. Zulkifli & I. thyes: Dasyatidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Yustian. 2018. Contemporary distribution records of Freshwaters, 28: 171-176. the giant freshwater stingray Urogymnus polylepis in Kottelat, M. 2013. The fishes of inland waters of South- Borneo (Chondrichthyes: Dasyatidae). Ichthyologi- east Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the cal Exploration of Freshwaters (in press). fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves Zakaria, M. D. 2017. [Lucky fishermen got giant sting- and estuaries. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Supple- ray]. [in Malay]. Available from https://www. ment, 27: 1-663. hmetro.com.my/utama/2017/11/285333/rezeki- Kottelat, M., A. J. Whitten, S. N. Kartikasari & S. pari-gergasi (accessed 11 February 2019). Wirjoatmodjo. 1993. Freshwater fishes of western Indonesia and Sulawesi. Periplus Editions, Hong Kong, 259 pp., 84 pls. Received 25 February 2019 Revised 5 March 2019 Accepted 2 August 2019

Iqbal et al.: Distribution of Urogymnus polylepis 4/28/2020 Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters

also developed by scimago: SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Scimago Journal & Country Rank Enter Journal Title, ISSN or Publisher Name

Home Journal Rankings Country Rankings Viz Tools Help About Us

Ads by Stop seeing this ad Why this ad? Streaming RAI, MediasetPlay

Ti manca l'Italia? Ti offriamo l'accesso alla TV italiana dall'estero. Prova ora, è gratis

Italia VPN APRI

Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters

Country Germany - SIR Ranking of Germany Subject Area and Category Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 Science and Zoology Aquatic Science Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics H Index

Publisher Verlag F. Pfeil

Publication type Journals

ISSN 09369902

Coverage 2005-ongoing

Join the conversation about this journal

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category Year Quartile Animal Science and Zoology 2006 Q2 https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=4000149003&tip=sid&clean=0 1/4 4/28/2020 Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters Category Year Quartile Animal ScienceA iandl SZoologyi d Z l 2007 Q2 SJR Citations per document

1.2The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that 2.5This indicator counts the number of citations received ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is by documents from a journal and divides them by the based on the idea that 'all citations are not created total number of documents published in that journal. 0.8 equal'. SJR is a measure of scientic inuence of The2 chart shows the evolution of the average number of journals that accounts for both the number of citations times documents published in a journal in the past two, 0.4received by a journal and the importance or prestige of three and four years have been cited in the current year. 1.5 the journals where such citations come from It The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 measures the scientic inuence of the average article ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric. in a journal it expresses how central to the global 1

Total Cites Self-Cites Cites per document Year Value 0.5Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2005 0.000 150 Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2006 0.515 self-citations received by a journal's published Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2007 0.750 documents during the three previous years. Cites0 / Doc. (4 years) 2008 0.679 75 Journal Self-citation is dened as the number of citation Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2009 0.796 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 from a journal citing article to articles published by the Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2010 0.883 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2011 0.761 same journal. Cites / Doc. (4 years) 0 CitesCites / Doc./ Doc. (4 (3 y years)ears) 2012 1.281 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 CitesCites / Doc./ Doc. (4 (2 y years)ears) 2013 1.600 Cites Year Value Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2014 1.390 S lf Cit 2005 0 External Cites per Doc Cites per Doc % International Collaboration

2Evolution of the number of total citation per document 75International Collaboration accounts for the articles that and external citation per document (i.e. journal self- have been produced by researchers from several citations removed) received by a journal's published 50countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's 1 documents during the three previous years. External documents signed by researchers from more than one 25 citations are calculated by subtracting the number of country; that is including more than one country 0self-citations from the total number of citations received addr0 ess. by the journal’s documents. 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Year International Collaboration Cit Y V l Citable documents Non-citable documents Cited documents Uncited documents

120 120 Not every article in a journal is considered primary Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those ratio of a journal's articles including substantial not cited during the following year. 60 60 research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents Documents Year Value other than research articles, reviews and conference 0 Uncited0 documents 2005 0 papers. 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Uncited2005 documents2007 2009 20062011 182013 2015 2017 Uncited documents 2007 36 D t Y V l Uncited documents 2008 51

https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=4000149003&tip=sid&clean=0 2/4 4/28/2020 Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters ← Show this widget in your own website

Just copy the code below and paste within your html code:

Web Analytics