DOCSLIB.ORG

A Preliminary List of Animal Names in the Chuuk District, Micronesia with Some Notes on Plant Names

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Preliminary List of Animal Names in the Chuuk District, Micronesia with Some Notes on Plant Names Micronesica 31(1):1-245, 1999 A Preliminary List of Animal Names in the Chuuk District, Micronesia with some notes on plant names Alan E. Davis1 1 Current Address: AAA196, Box 10001, Saipan, MP 96950, CNMI This list is dedicated to my children, Forrest LeRoy Eugene Davis, Timothy Davis, and Thomas Gotthelf Fischer Davis, Tian Taky Davis, and Dianne Eclipse Davis and to all other little boys and girls in Chuuk whose mothers and fathers do not understand one another very well. Revised from a technical report printed by the College of Mi- cronesia and the Micronesian Language Institute (UOG). °c 1996, 1999 Alan Eugene Davis °c 1996, 1999 College of Micronesia, Chuuk °c 1996, 1999 Micronesian Language Institute, University of Guam This document may be freely copied, on the condition that a copy of this notice is provided or else, for excerpts, that full acknowledgement is given of this source. Abstract—This is an unfinished list of animal names, including many unverified names, from dialects / languages commonly heard in Chuuk Lagoon, the Mortlock Islands, Hall Islands, Western Islands (Pattiw) and Nominweit´e,constituting the Eastern end of a chain of related dialects and cultures extending from Sonsorol and Tobi to Chuuk Lagoon. This list may emphasize a relatively small number of dialects; names are listed, however, from throughout the district. Animal names are ordered phylogenetically, divided into chapters according to broad classification. Chapters on sponges, coelenterates, worms, molluscs, crus- taceans, and insects and allies are divided into sections by category. Fishes are the subject of one large chapter, divided into sections by family. There are addi- tional chapters on birds, reptiles and amphibians, and mammals. Two appendices include some notes on botanical names: Appendix A covers the fungi and algae; Appendix B consists of notes on names of higher plants. This list includes extensive notes and remarks on cultural values, use, and knowledge, gleaned from many local sources. Notes are included to help identify the organisms or names, when they are not certain. An index lists all the names in an alphabetical order by local name. Micronesica 31(1):1-239, 1999 Davis: Chuukese Animal Names 5 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 7 1 Introduction 13 2 How to Use This List 17 3 Sponges 25 4 Coelenterata 27 5 Worms 35 6 Mollusca 39 7 Crustacea 61 8 Insects & Allied Arthropods 74 9 Echinoderms 84 10 Fishes 96 11 Birds 171 12 Reptiles and Amphibians 186 13 Mammals 189 Appendix A: Prokaryota, Fungi, Algae 191 Appendix B: Higher Plants 195 References 217 Vernacular Name Index 221 6 Micronesica 31(1), 1999 Acknowledgements This list, tentative as it is, has than a dictionary. To those who will come into being through a process of feel frustrated in attempting to use this accretion, an accumulation bit-by-bit list, for this reason, I apologize. Hope- of hastily scribbled memoranda—in the fully the inclusion of an index will solve margins of books, in notebooks, on some of the problems. The inevitable scraps of paper, or on the backs of en- spelling errors reflect the untrained ear velopes, through an extended personal of a non-native speaker, and for this I commitment to learn the local names of must likewise apologize; I hope that na- animals. Notes have been collected, if tive speakers will correct them, making not everyday, over the course of more this list a more useful one. than a decade, beginning in 1984. This list has taken form out of the Notes have been lost due to various good will of hundreds of native speakers, causes over the years. To archive them, many of whom have been, and remain as well as to organize them, I have been friends, family members, colleagues, or storing them them in digital form for students. None of these contributors several years. Through the generous as- has enjoyed any useful compensation, sistance of the College of Micronesia, either for their time or for their knowl- Chuuk and the Micronesian Language edge. Because these contributions have Institute, University of Guam, it has been made without compensation, it is been possible to set out this accumula- especially important to acknowledge the tion of notes as a preliminary working contributions which have led to any suc- list. cess the list might enjoy. All contri- Though it has grown through a grad- butions deserve acknowledgement; yet, ual penetration of the subject matter, even if I could remember them all, it over an extended period of time, this would be impossible even to list here the work is truly preliminary in at least names of all contributors. two senses. First, the study of animal Here, I will extend my gratitude names was begun as a prerequisite to to those who gave names; those who more specific interests in indigenous ma- have joined me in extended discussions rine zoological knowledge. Second, the about our mutual interests in marine list is imperfect and incomplete, and is life; those who have contributed advice hoped to be a stepping stone toward and assistance that has advanced the more thorough and perfect lists. In both project; and those who provided mate- senses, the list is substantial enough at rial support. I apologize to those whose this point to serve as a working list. names I have inevitably not mentioned, The format of the list—an order whether out of my forgetfulness or due based on scientific classification—will to the disarray of my notes. perhaps make it more difficult to use Remix Baluay, of Lukunor, gave 8 Micronesica 31(1), 1999 me my first introduction to Chuukese. uney, Maner Rediniphy, Marceny Elias, Zorro Otto, of Nomwin, and Zorro’s Marino Siver, Masasy Kony, Meme, father, Seisi Otto, were instrumental Misako and Totosy Nikiti, Onis Osonis, in the early years; since then, several Peter Sirasi, Sister, Soochi, and Weires of their relatives, including Fil´e Refi- Kovac, deceased, lost at sea. Many of long, Asher Mull, Joanes Bob, and Hans my colleagues at Chuuk High School Otto, have faithfully maintained the fo- joined the discussions, especially while cus of our friendships on our mutual we were repairing the school after Ty- interests, marine animals, for over a phoon Nina. Special names and insights decade. Kimeuo Kimiuo and Alvios were offered by Weiti; the late Aichiro, William have spent countless hours at- Masachy, Sidro. Sleeper and Ismael tempting to teach me the sounds of the have shared their formidable knowledge Chuukic language complex, their cor- of plants. Benito, of Piis Moen, shared rect pronounciation, and perhaps their in many discussions of the biology of spelling (truly an important matter, various marine life. when words are being reduced to writ- Other notable contributions have ing for the first time). Earlier, Professor been made by Pisente Johnson, Ad- John Kingston of the UCSB Linguistics dguess, Aiwo Kuma, Akira, Berry, Department guided me through the lit- Bruda, Bruno Mario, the now Capt. erature on Chuukese orthography and Kalisto, Cygnus, Iosichi, Haspen, Ish- phonology. mael, James Kintin, Kech, now de- Dozens of persons whose names I ceased, Kamuo, Kaspar, Kasto, Kata have forgotten—or never knew—have Mokur, now deceased, Kipier Lipwei, contributed in memorable ways. More Maiser, Masasingi Eis, Mokur, Nogood, than once I have been approached by a Pastor Medal, Present, Silander, Sim- stranger, who, having heard of my inter- iuo, Singeto Nimwes, Tady Otis, Ronny, ests, wished to share with me some new Takiri, Petrus Martin, and Yamada. name, or an anecdote, or perhaps some The family of the mother of my first morsel of biological knowledge of a fish. son, Forrest, Katary Sop, shared my en- Many students of mine have made im- thusiasm with marine life; I cannot pos- portant contributions; regrettably, only sibly adequately express my affection a few of them can be acknowledged here. for these people, or my appreciation for It is hard to know even where to start. their having taken so active a part in my Special or memorable contributions study of names of marine life. have been made by the following, Yusako Kimiuo, Tirr´e Eram, Max among others: Benita, Dony Carlos, Nuokus, Rukan Aizawa (whose knowl- Chuneo Nimwes, Enis, Epa, Isinori edge of marine life is so extensive I Manuel, Saichi Keper, Taboko, Kine- would take his course, were he to offer mare, Kawarata and Terwie, mater- one), Nisom (with an awesome knowl- nal grandfather and grandmother of edge of plants), Chester Gustaf, Pikoch, Forrest, my first son, Esetong Kim- Siro Tanam, Roll and Siaia Aini, all iuo, Reichy Albert, many Faichuk Ju- the staff members at Farr´eelementary nior High School staff members, Her- school and West Wonip annex school— lip Nowell, Kauri, Kayo Noket, Kerat each deserves to be thanked person- Rikim, Kisiwo, Lorenis, Lucky Re- ally. Namie Alexander and his brother Acknowledgements Davis: Chuukese Animal Names 9 Akitaro, of Nama, took to my educa- Polle, Maron Gabe and John Sandy of tion about marine life with special in- Pullap, Marcus Edward of Puluwat, my tensity and enthusiasm. Opet showed many friends from Nomwin, and Ermes a special interest in scientific knowl- Paul together with Dominik, Enrino, edge of marine life. Kangichy Welle Erko and Eric, his sons. These are but a used to take pains to explain special few among many who have contributed knowledge he had learned from his fa- greatly in more significant ways. Much ther; Tobias Martin solved a riddle. more should be said about each of them. I was privileged that Hipour, having I want to mention Simeon, of Puluwat, understood my interest in calendrics, who reported that since he had taken shared his deep insight; Nartaka in- my marine biology course, he was no stantly knew which was the poisonous longer favored as a fishing partner: with crab; Masamichi Masis, having been in- his new found interest in reef inverte- doctrinated that traditional ways are brates, and penchant for close scrutiny evil, yet revealed (though, I fear, with of reef organisms, it was now impossible some trepidation) important insights for him to keep up with the rest of the into traditional beliefs about a certain group.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Size Composition, Growth, Mortality and Yield of Alectis Alexandrinus (Geoffory Saint-Hilaire) in Bonny River, Niger Delta, Nigeria
    African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 8 (23), pp. 6721-6723, 1 December, 2009 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB ISSN 1684–5315 © 2009 Academic Journals Short Communication Size composition, growth, mortality and yield of Alectis alexandrinus (Geoffory Saint-Hilaire) in Bonny River, Niger Delta, Nigeria S. N. Deekae1, K. O. Chukwu1 and A. J. Gbulubo2 1Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Environment, Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Port-Harcourt Rivers State, Nigeria. 2African Regional Aquaculture Centre, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, P.M.B.5122, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Accepted 3 November, 2008 A twelve month study on the size composition, growth, mortality and yield of Alectis alexandrinus revealed a length range of 11.5 - 33.8 cm (standard length). Employing the length frequency method in the FISAT II package gave the following results for the Von Bertanlanffy growth parameters: L = 35.23, K = 0.680, to = 0.3214 and = 2.926. The total mortality (Z) was 2.47, natural mortality (M) 1.39 and fishing mortality (F) 1.08.The relative biomass per recruit (knife edge selection) was Lc/ L = 0.05, E10 = 0.355 and E50 = 0.278. Although the exploitation rate (E) was 0.44 the Emax was 0.421 indicating moderate exploitation of the fish in Bonny River. There is room for increased effort in the fisheries. Key word: Size, growth, mortality, yield, Alectis alexandrinus. INTRODUCTION Alectics alexandrinus is one of the commercially valuable tions or species into categories of high, medium low and fishes in the gulf of Guinea, which could be relevant in very low resilience or productivity have been suggested sport fishing as obtainable in places like Hawaii (Pamela et al., 2001; Musick, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Jarvis Island NWR Final
    Jarvis Island National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Jarvis Island National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Unincorporated U.S. Territory, Central Pacific Ocean The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has completed the Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) and Environmental Assessment (EA) for Jarvis Island National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). The CCP will guide management of the Refuge for the next 15 years. The CCP and EA describe the Service’s preferred alternative for managing the Refuge and its effects on the human environment. Decision Following comprehensive review and analysis, the Service selected Alternative B in the draft EA for implementation because it is the alternative that best meets the following criteria: Achieves the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System. Achieves the purposes of the Refuge. Will be able to achieve the vision and goals for the Refuge. Maintains and restores the ecological integrity of the habitats and plant and animal populations at the Refuge. Addresses the important issues identified during the scoping process. Addresses the legal mandates of the Service and the Refuge. Is consistent with the scientific principles of sound wildlife management. Can be implemented within the projected fiscal and logistical management constraints associated with the Refuge’s remote location. As described in detail in the CCP and EA, implementing the selected alternative will have no significant impacts on any of the natural or cultural resources identified in the CCP and EA. Public Review The planning process incorporated a variety of public involvement techniques in developing and reviewing the CCP. This included three planning updates, meetings with partners, and public review and comment on the planning documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Ecology of Sardines in the Philippines: a Review
    Biology and Ecology of Sardines in the Philippines: A Review Demian A. Willette 1,2 , Eunice D.C. Bognot 2, Ma. Theresa M.Mutia 3, and Mudjekeewis D. Santos 2 1 CT-PIRE Philippines, Old Dominion University, United States of America 2 National Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Quezon City, Philippines 3 Fisheries Biological Research Centre, Batangas, Philippines REVIEWERS: Stanley Swerdloff, Ph.D Sr. Fisheries Advisor GEM Program Damosa Business Center, Anglionto St Davao City 8000, Philippines [email protected] Kerry Reeves, Ph.D Office of Energy and Environment USAID Philippines Email: [email protected] Tel: +63 2 552 9822 Kent E. Carpenter, Ph.D Professor Department of Biological Sciences Old Dominion University Norfolk, Virginia 23529-0266 USA & Global Marine Species Assessment Coordinator IUCN/CI/:http://www.sci.odu. edu/gmsa/ Coral Triangle PIRE project: www.sci.odu.edu/impa/ctpire. html Office Phone: (757) 683-4197 Fax: (757) 683-5283 Email: [email protected] http://sci.odu.edu/biology/ directory/kent.shtml COVER DESIGN BY: HEHERSON G. BAUN Abstract Sardines (Clupeidae) make up a substantial proportion of the fish catch across the Philippines and consequently are the most accessible source of animal protein for millions of Filipinos. Further, this fishery is an economic engine providing thousands of jobs and generating revenue at the individual, municipal, and national levels. Ecologically, sardines are basally positioned in a food web that supports pelagic tuna and mackerel, as well as numerous sea birds and marine mammals. Philippine sardine biodiversity is among the highest in the world and includes the only known freshwater sardine species.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Live Coral Habitat for Reef Fishes and Its Role in Key Ecological Processes
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Coker, Darren J. (2012) The importance of live coral habitat for reef fishes and its role in key ecological processes. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/23714/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/23714/ THE IMPORTANCE OF LIVE CORAL HABITAT FOR REEF FISHES AND ITS ROLE IN KEY ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES Thesis submitted by Darren J. Coker (B.Sc, GDipResMeth) May 2012 For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and AIMS@JCU James Cook University Townsville, Queensland, Australia Statement of access I, the undersigned, the author of this thesis, understand that James Cook University will make it available for use within the University Library and via the Australian Digital Thesis Network for use elsewhere. I understand that as an unpublished work this thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and I do not wish to put any further restrictions upon access to this thesis. Signature Date ii Statement of sources Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at my university or other institution of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Eurypegasus Draconis
    click for previous page 2262 Bony Fishes Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Seamoths (seadragons) by T.W. Pietsch and W.A. Palsson iagnostic characters: Small fishes (to 18 cm total length); body depressed, completely encased in Dfused dermal plates; tail encircled by 8 to 14 laterally articulating, or fused, bony rings. Nasal bones elongate, fused, forming a rostrum; mouth inferior. Gill opening restricted to a small hole on dorsolat- eral surface behind head. Spinous dorsal fin absent; soft dorsal and anal fins each with 5 rays, placed posteriorly on body. Caudal fin with 8 unbranched rays. Pectoral fins large, wing-like, inserted horizon- tally, composed of 9 to 19 unbranched, soft or spinous-soft rays; pectoral-fin rays interconnected by broad, transparent membranes. Pelvic fins thoracic, tentacle-like,withI spine and 2 or 3 unbranched soft rays. Colour: in life highly variable, apparently capable of rapid colour change to match substrata; head and body light to dark brown, olive-brown, reddish brown, or almost black, with dorsal and lateral surfaces usually darker than ventral surface; dorsal and lateral body surface often with fine, dark brown reticulations or mottled lines, sometimes with irregular white or yellow blotches; tail rings often encircled with dark brown bands; pectoral fins with broad white outer margin and small brown spots forming irregular, longitudinal bands; unpaired fins with small brown spots in irregular rows. dorsal view lateral view Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Benthic, found on sand, gravel, shell-rubble, or muddy bottoms. Collected incidentally by seine, trawl, dredge, or shrimp nets; postlarvae have been taken at surface lights at night.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships of the Starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnini) and the Mockingbirds (Sturnidae: Mimini)
    THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE STARLINGS (STURNIDAE: STURNINI) AND THE MOCKINGBIRDS (STURNIDAE: MIMINI) CHARLESG. SIBLEYAND JON E. AHLQUIST Departmentof Biologyand PeabodyMuseum of Natural History,Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ABSTRACT.--OldWorld starlingshave been thought to be related to crowsand their allies, to weaverbirds, or to New World troupials. New World mockingbirdsand thrashershave usually been placed near the thrushesand/or wrens. DNA-DNA hybridization data indi- cated that starlingsand mockingbirdsare more closelyrelated to each other than either is to any other living taxon. Some avian systematistsdoubted this conclusion.Therefore, a more extensiveDNA hybridizationstudy was conducted,and a successfulsearch was made for other evidence of the relationshipbetween starlingsand mockingbirds.The resultssup- port our original conclusionthat the two groupsdiverged from a commonancestor in the late Oligoceneor early Miocene, about 23-28 million yearsago, and that their relationship may be expressedin our passerineclassification, based on DNA comparisons,by placing them as sistertribes in the Family Sturnidae,Superfamily Turdoidea, Parvorder Muscicapae, Suborder Passeres.Their next nearest relatives are the members of the Turdidae, including the typical thrushes,erithacine chats,and muscicapineflycatchers. Received 15 March 1983, acceptedI November1983. STARLINGS are confined to the Old World, dine thrushesinclude Turdus,Catharus, Hylocich- mockingbirdsand thrashersto the New World. la, Zootheraand Myadestes.d) Cinclusis
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fishes of the Bird's Head Peninsula, West
    Check List 5(3): 587–628, 2009. ISSN: 1809-127X LISTS OF SPECIES Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia Gerald R. Allen 1 Mark V. Erdmann 2 1 Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum. Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Perth, Western Australia 6986. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Conservation International Indonesia Marine Program. Jl. Dr. Muwardi No. 17, Renon, Denpasar 80235 Indonesia. Abstract A checklist of shallow (to 60 m depth) reef fishes is provided for the Bird’s Head Peninsula region of West Papua, Indonesia. The area, which occupies the extreme western end of New Guinea, contains the world’s most diverse assemblage of coral reef fishes. The current checklist, which includes both historical records and recent survey results, includes 1,511 species in 451 genera and 111 families. Respective species totals for the three main coral reef areas – Raja Ampat Islands, Fakfak-Kaimana coast, and Cenderawasih Bay – are 1320, 995, and 877. In addition to its extraordinary species diversity, the region exhibits a remarkable level of endemism considering its relatively small area. A total of 26 species in 14 families are currently considered to be confined to the region. Introduction and finally a complex geologic past highlighted The region consisting of eastern Indonesia, East by shifting island arcs, oceanic plate collisions, Timor, Sabah, Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and widely fluctuating sea levels (Polhemus and the Solomon Islands is the global centre of 2007). reef fish diversity (Allen 2008). Approximately 2,460 species or 60 percent of the entire reef fish The Bird’s Head Peninsula and surrounding fauna of the Indo-West Pacific inhabits this waters has attracted the attention of naturalists and region, which is commonly referred to as the scientists ever since it was first visited by Coral Triangle (CT).
    [Show full text]
  • Centriscidae Bonaparte, 1831 - Razorfishes, Shrimpfishes
    FAMILY Centriscidae Bonaparte, 1831 - razorfishes, shrimpfishes SUBFAMILY Macroramphosinae Bleeker, 1879 - razorfishes, snipefishes [=Siluridi, Orthichthyinae, Macrorhamphoidei] Notes: Name in prevailing recent practice Siluridi Rafinesque, 1810b:35 [ref. 3595] (ordine) Macroramphosus [no stem of the type genus, no available, Article 11.7.1.1] Orthichthyinae Gill, 1862j:234 (footnote) [ref. 1663] (subfamily) Orthichthys [family-group name never used as valid after 1899] Macrorhamphoidei Bleeker, 1879a:14 [ref. 460] (family) Macroramphosus [Macrorhamphus inferred from the stem, Article 11.7.1.1; name must be corrected Article 32.5.3; stem corrected to Macroramphos- by Gill 1884c:156, 162 [ref. 17660]; family-group name used as valid by: Schultz with Stern 1948 [ref. 31938], Kamohara 1967, McAllister 1968 [ref. 26854], Lindberg 1971 [ref. 27211], Lagler, Bardach, Miller & May Passino 1977, Nelson 1984 [ref. 13596], Smith & Heemstra 1986 [ref. 5715], Whitehead et al. (1986a) [ref. 13676], Paxton et al. 1989 [ref. 12442], Quéro et al. 1990 [ref. 15946], Nelson 1994 [ref. 26204], Eschmeyer 1998 [ref. 23416], Menezes et al. 2003 [ref. 27192], Nelson et al. 2004 [ref. 27807], Hoese et al. 2006, Nelson 2006 [ref. 32486]; family name sometimes seen as †Rhamphosidae] GENUS Centriscops Gill, 1862 - bellowsfishes [=Centriscops Gill [T. N.], 1862:234, Limiculina (subgenus of Macrorhamphosus) Fowler [H. W.], 1907:425] Notes: [ref. 1663]. Masc. Centriscus humerosus Richardson, 1846. Type by monotypy. •Valid as Centriscops Gill, 1862 -- (Mohr 1937:53 [ref. 15290], Heemstra 1986:459 [ref. 5660], Paxton et al. 1989:407 [ref. 12442], Duhamel 1995:264 [ref. 21927], Gomon et al. 1994:436 [ref. 22532], Keivany & Nelson 2006:S84 [ref. 28978], Paxton et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Jungle Myna (Acridotheres Fuscus)
    Invasive animal risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus Steve Csurhes First published 2011 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Front cover: Jungle myna Photo: Used with permission, Wikimedia Commons. Invasive animal risk assessment: Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus 2 Contents Summary 4 Introduction 5 Identity and taxonomy 5 Description and biology 5 Diet 5 Reproduction 5 Preferred habitat and climate 6 Native range and global distribution 6 Current distribution and impact in Queensland 6 History as a pest overseas 7 Use 7 Potential distribution and impact in Queensland 7 References 8 Invasive animal risk assessment: Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus 3 Summary Acridotheres fuscus (jungle myna) is native to an extensive area of India and parts of southeast Asia. Naturalised populations exist in Singapore, Taiwan, Fiji, Western Samoa and elsewhere. In Fiji, the species occasionally causes significant damage to crops of ground nuts, with crop losses of up to 40% recorded. Within its native range (South India), it is not a well documented pest, but occasionally causes considerable (localised) damage to fruit orchards.
    [Show full text]