DOCSLIB.ORG

271 1. ACS, SPD, 500.018, 838: Cremonesi to Mussolini, 31.12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
271 1. ACS, SPD, 500.018, 838: Cremonesi to Mussolini, 31.12 Notes 1. ACS, SPD, 500.018, 838: Cremonesi to Mussolini, 31.12.1922/17.4.1923/21.10. 1925. 2. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, fascicolo ‘Problemi della Capitale, Anno 1928’: Mussolini to Spada Potenziani, 14.4.1928. 3. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, fascicolo ‘Problemi della Capitale, Anno 1928’: Mussolini to Spada Potenziani, 14.4.1928. 4. The final iteration of the plan can be found in ACS, Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione (MPI), Direzione Generale AA.BB.AA, Div II/ 1929– 33, 199. 5. AC, 38/32: Prefect to X Ripartizione, 14.2.1928. 6. AC, 38/32: Rip X to Governatorato, 4.2.1928. 7. AC, 38/32: Oppo’s article in the daily La Tribuna, 22.1.1926. 8. ACS, SPD, 174.330: Brasini to Duce, 23.10.1927. 9. ACS, PCM, 1930– 31, 1595: Giunta to Potenziani, 16.9.1928. 10. La Burbera: Gustavo Giovannoni, Pietro Aschieri, Giuseppe Boni, Enrico Del Debbio, Vincenzo Fasolo, Arnaldo Foschini, Giacomo Giobbe, Alessandro Limongelli, Felice Nori, Ghino Venturi. GUR: Marcello Piacentini, Luigi Piccinato, Gino Cancellotti, Eugenio Fuselli, Giuseppe Nicolosi, Cesare Valle. 11. ACS, SPD, 104.113: Piacentini to Mussolini, 4.10.1929. 12. ACS, SPD, 104.113: Bottai to Chiavolini, 21.9.1929. 13. ACS, SPD, 104.113: Chiavolini to Rossi, 12.10.29; Chiavolini to Bottai, 3.10.1929. 14. ACS, SPD, 104.113: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 22.3.1930. 15. ACS, MPI, AABBAA, II, 1929– 33, 86: Piacentini to Ludovisi, 21.10.1930. 16. ACS, SPD, 174.330: Chiavolini to Brasini, 14.4.1930. 17. ACS, SPD, 174.330: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 12.9.1929; Brasini to Mussolini, 31.3.1930. 18. ACS, MPI, 86: Bottai to Borghese, 16.1.1941. 19. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 843: Borghese to Mussolini, 26.10.1941. 20. Popolo d’Italia, 29.12.1928. 21. ACS, MPI, AABBAA, II, 1940– 45, 86: Commissione per l’esame del PR, 24.3.1928. 22. AC, AS2, 2, 12.12.1927. 23. ACS, SPD, 509.428: Boncompagni Ludovisi, ‘Appunto per il Duce’, 20.7.1934. 24. ACS, SPD, 137.307: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 1.3.1933. 25. ACS, MPI, AABBAA, II, 1929– 33, 183: DGABA session, 18.4.1933. 26. ACS, SPD, 137.307: ‘Appunto per il Duce’, 30.10. 1932; and Minister of Education, Director for Antiquities and Fine Arts to Mussolini, December 1933. 27. ACS, SPD, 137.307: Alfiero to Chiavolini, 28.3.1933. 28. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 840: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 2.10.1934. 29. ACS, SPD, 137.037: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 8.7.1936, 26.7.1936, 12.7.1939; SPD, 500.019 I, 841, Colonna to Mussolini, 6.5.1937. 30. AC, Rip X, 147/10, is dedicated to the production of the fifth map of Via dell’Impero; while 136/2 chronicles the earlier four maps. 31. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 840: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 30.8.1934. 32. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 840: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 3.6.1934. 271 272 Notes 33. ACS, MPI, AABBAA, II, 1929– 33, 183: Report of Superintendence of Museums and Excavations in the Province of Rome, 3.6.1924; Ministry of Finance to DGABA, 10.2.1932. 34. ACS, SPD, 174.330: Colonna to Mussolini, 6.3 and 20.4.1937. 35. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 840: ‘Opere del Piano Regolatore da attuare nel quaddriennio 1936– 41’, 9.12.1937. 36. ACS, SPD, 174.330: Brasini to Mussolini, n.d. 37. ACS, MPI, 36, Minutes of meeting, 16.5.1935; SPD, 500.019 I, 840: PCM to Prefects, 25.7.1933. 38. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 840: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 30.8.1934. 39. ACS, SPD, 509.428: Boncompagni Ludovisi, ‘Appunto per il ‘Duce’, 20.7.1934. 40. ACS, SPD, 509.428: Report by Morpurgo on the progress of demolitions, 1938 (no specific date). 41. ACS, MPI, 35: Report by M E Cannizzaro on the excavations of Ara Pacis, 18.3.1904. 42. ACS, MPI, 35: ‘Proposta presentata da Prof. Oreste Mattirolo alla Società’ Piedmontesa di Archeologia e Belle Arti’, 22.12.1918. 43. ACS, MPI, 36: Fedele to the DGABA, 11.5.1926; Cremonesi to Fedele, 20.8.1926. 44. ACS, MPI, 36: ‘Progetto Frezzotti per l’Ara Pacis’, n.d.; cf. ACS, MPI, 36: ‘Progetto per la sistemazione dell’Ara Pacis’, 8.4.1942. 45. ACS, MPI, 36: Minutes of the Special Committee for the Ara Pacis, 20.1.1937. 46. ACS, MPI, 36: ‘Per la ricostruzione dell’Ara Pacis’, 21.1.1937; Report by Giglioli, 16.5.1935; Governatorato, ‘Promemoria’, 30.5.1937. 47. ACS, Carte Gatti, 17: ‘Ara Pacis Augustae. Criteri seguiti durante a ricostruzione ( 1937– 38) e proposte di modifiche’, Gatti to Aurigemma, 5.2.1939. 48. ACS, MPI, 36: DGABA, Commissione II, 1934– 1940, 36: Giuseppe Moretti to Superintendence of Antiquities of Roma, 13.7.1938. 49. ACS, SPD, 135.015: Head of Cabinet to Council of Ministers/DGABA, 22.9.1938. 50. ACS, MPI, 172: Director of Superintendence Monuments of Lazio to Ministry of Education, 27.6.1929. 51. ‘Notizie’, Urbanistica 15/3 (1937): 198– 9. 52. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 841: Colonna to SPD, 26.5.1937. 53. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 839: Lateran Pacts, Agreement on extra- territorial posses- sions of the Vatican State. 54. ACS, SPD, 7583: (Spaccarelli to Mussolini, 4.1932); and 7538: (Spaccarelli to Mussolini, 14.7.1934). 55. ACS, SPD, 7583: Spaccarelli to Mussolini, 7.3.1933. 56. ACS, SPD, 7583: Spaccarelli to Mussolini, 16.7.1934. 57. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 839: ‘Commissione per l’esecuzione del Concordato del Laterano’. 58. ACS, SPD, 7583: Gai, Natale, Cecchelli plan, 11.1934. 59. ACS, SPD, 7583: Presidenza Consiglio Ministri, Gabinetto, 17.6.1936. 60. AC, Verbali, 1936: 3266, 25.6.1936. 61. AC, Verbali, 1936: 4353, 19.8.26; 4603, 7.9.36; 6584, 21.12.1936. 62. ACS, SPD, 7583 (Piacentini and Spaccarelli, Memorandum, 7.10.1937). The various plans/scenarios presented by the two architects as solutions to both these questions can be found in this folder. 63. ‘Il Duce esamina le prove dell’accesso a San Pietro’, Il Messaggero, 12.5.1938. 64. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 841: SPD, Notice, 25.10.1937. 65. ACS, SPD, 7583: intercepted conversation between A. Spaccarelli and P. Scarpa, 25.5.1937. 66. ACS, SPD, 7583: Piacentini and Spaccarelli to Mussolini, 24.2.1938. Notes 273 67. ACS, MCP, Gabinetto, 63, folder ‘Relazione sulla prossima visita del Fuehrer’, passim. 68. ‘La decisione del Duce per la costruzione su Via dell’Impero della sede del Partito e della Mostra fascista’, Popolo d’Italia 19/287 (2.12.1932): 1. 69. ‘[Palazzo del Littorio] – Bando del Concorso’. Architettura. Fascicolo Speziale: Concorso per il Palazzo del Littorio. 13/12 (12.1934): 5– 8. 70. ACS, SPD, 174.093: Armando Brasini, ‘Modello della Mole Littoria, più grande di S. Pietro’, 7.2.1937. 71. ACS, SPD, 509.519b: Mario Palanti, Report on ‘L’Eternale – Mole Littoria’, 6.1926. 72. ACS, SPD, 509.519b: Palanti to Foscati, Vice President of the Judging Committee of the Competition for the Torre Littoria in Milan, 14.10.1935. 73. SPD, 500.019 I, 841: Boncompagni Ludovisi report, 26.5.1937. 74. ‘La Casa Madre dei Mutilati in Roma’, Architettura e Arte Decorativi 8/2 (6.1929): 433– 58. 75. ACS, SPD, 174.330: Brasini to Mussolini, 21.4.1932. 76. ACS, SPD, 174.330: Brasini to Mussolini 27.8.32; cf. Brasini to Mussolini, 27.7.1936; Brasini to Giunta, 15.5.1937. 77. ACS, SPD, 174.330: Brasini to Mussolini, 27.4.1938. 78. ACS, MPI, AABBAA, II 1934– 40, 37: Colonna to Bottai, 6.2. and 14.4.1937. 79. ACS, MPI, AABBAA, II 1934– 40, 37: Capo Gabinetto del Governatore to Bottai, 30.5.1937; SPD to Bottai, 31.3.1937. 80. NdR, ‘Il Ministero dell’Aeronautica’, Architettura 2/10 (1932): 53– 68. 81. NdR, ‘Concorso per la nuova sede del Ministero degli Affari Esteri’, Architettura 18/11 (1940): 529– 66. 82. ACS, EUR, 899: Oppo to Minnucci, 15.7.1938. 83. ACS, EUR, 899: Ente Autonomo EUR to Mussolini, 15.12.1939. 84. NdR, ‘Organizzazioni e caratteristiche tecniche dell’opera [Foro Mussolini]’, Architettura 11/2 (1933): 90. 85. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 840: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 1.8.1934. 86. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 840: Boncompagni Ludovisi to Mussolini, 1.8.1934. 87. ACS, MPI, 183: Ricci to Paribeni, 24.1.1930; Bendinelli to Paribeni, 23.6.1929. 88. NdR, ‘Palestra del Duce alla Terme del Foro’, Architettura 15/12 (1940): 583– 93. 89. NdR, ‘Cella commemorativa in Roma’, Architettura 22/ 9– 10 (1943): 229– 38. 90. ACS, SPD, CR 103: Piacentini to Mussolini, 4.4.1932. 91. NdR, ‘Casa dello Studente’. Fascicolo Speziale: La Città Universitaria di Roma. Architettura 14 (1935): 78– 80. 92. ACS, SPD, 509.813: Mussolini to Calza Bini, 16.9.27; Calza Bini to SPD, 25.10.1927. 93. ACS, SPD, 509.318: Calza Bini to Mussolini, 21.10.1927. 94. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 838: Boncompagni Ludovisi’s report about housing in Rome, 1.10.1931. 95. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 841: Bottai’s report on housing and the ‘baracche’, 21.5.1935 and 31.7.1935. 96. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 841: Colonna to Mussolini, 14.5.1936. 97. ACS, SPD, 500.019 I, 840: Bottai to Mussolini, 30.4.1936. 98. ACS, SPD, 509.813: ICP, ‘Appunti sull’opera svolta dall’avvento del regime’, 4.1927. 99. ACS, Ministero dell'Interno (MI), PS, 1930– 31, 328: report on social housing by Governor Giuseppe Bottai, 9.3.1933.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boso's- Lfe of Alexdnder 111
    Boso's- Lfe of Alexdnder 111 Introduction by PETER MUNZ Translated by G. M. ELLIS (AG- OXFORD . BASIL BLACKWELL @ Basil Blackwell 1973 AI1 rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval System, or uansmitted, in any form or by. any. means, electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permis- sion of Basil Blackwell & Mott Limited. ICBN o 631 14990 2 Library of Congress Catalog Card Num'cer: 72-96427 Printed in Great Britain by Western Printing Services Ltd, Bristol MONUMENTA GERilAANIAE I-' 11.2' I d8-:;c,-q-- Bibliothek Boso's history of Pope Alexander I11 (1159-1181) is the most re- markable Part of the Liber Pontificalis. Unlike almost all the other contributions, it is far more than an informative chronicle. It is a work of history in its own right and falsely described as a Life of Alexander 111. Boso's work is in fact a history of the Iong schism in the church brought about by the double election of I159 and perpet- uated until the Peace of Venice in I 177. It makes no claim to be a Life of Alexander because it not only says nothing about his career before his election but also purposely omits all those events and activities of his pontificate which do not strictly belong to the history of the schism. It ends with Alexander's return to Rome in 1176. Some historians have imagined that this ending was enforced by Boso's death which is supposed to have taken piace in 1178.~But there is no need for such a supposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture, Form, Expression. the Helicoidal Skyscrapers'geometry
    Bridges 2012: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture Architecture, Form, Expression. The Helicoidal Skyscrapers’Geometry Alessandra CAPANNA Dipartimento di Architettura e Progetto “Sapienza” Università di Roma Via Flaminia 359 - 00196 Roma, ITALY E-mail: [email protected] Mauro FRANCAVIGLIA Marcella G. LORENZI Dipartimento di Matematica, Laboratorio per la Comunicazione Scientifica Università di Torino Università della Calabria Via Carlo Alberto,10 - 10123 Torino, ITALY Cubo 30b, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende CS, E-mail: [email protected] ITALY E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Expressionist utopia of an Architect imitating the rigorous and -at the same time- extremely bizarre formative principles of Nature, linked with the engineering “must” of a coherent and correct structure are apparent antithesis if only played as the manifestation of an irrational and uncontrolled freedom. We explore the ancient idea of Harmony and Beauty and the historical confidence in the logarithmic spiral as the symbol of perfection in an un- built project for a 565 m (1,854 ft) high skyscraper that was supposed to be built on the tip of Manhattan, NYC. The role of geometry is no more exploited as an instrument for controlling architectural form, but for its liberation: the project for a helicoidal skyscraper consisted of a succession of warped wings developed on the layout of the logarithmic spiral. The helicoidal shape, works better than the others in splitting up the force of the wind in resistance, has a positive influence on the stability of the building and is the result of a strong design theory wondering about the power of invention, the power of geometry, the power of relationships among numbers, and finally the beauty of (deriving from) mathematics (in Architecture).
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis Mumford – Sidewalk Critic
    SIDEWALK CRITIC SIDEWALK CRITIC LEWIS MUMFORD’S WRITINGS ON NEW YORK EDITED BY Robert Wojtowicz PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL PRESS • NEW YORK Published by Library of Congress Princeton Architectural Press Cataloging-in-Publication Data 37 East 7th Street Mumford, Lewis, 1895‒1990 New York, New York 10003 Sidewalk critic : Lewis Mumford’s 212.995.9620 writings on New York / Robert Wojtowicz, editor. For a free catalog of books, p. cm. call 1.800.722.6657. A selection of essays from the New Visit our web site at www.papress.com. Yorker, published between 1931 and 1940. ©1998 Princeton Architectural Press Includes bibliographical references All rights reserved and index. Printed and bound in the United States ISBN 1-56898-133-3 (alk. paper) 02 01 00 99 98 5 4 3 2 1 First edition 1. Architecture—New York (State) —New York. 2. Architecture, Modern “The Sky Line” is a trademark of the —20th century—New York (State)— New Yorker. New York. 3. New York (N.Y.)— Buildings, structures, etc. I. Wojtowicz, No part of this book my be used or repro- Robert. II. Title. duced in any manner without written NA735.N5M79 1998 permission from the publisher, except in 720’.9747’1—dc21 98-18843 the context of reviews. CIP Editing and design: Endsheets: Midtown Manhattan, Clare Jacobson 1937‒38. Photo by Alexander Alland. Copy editing and indexing: Frontispiece: Portrait of Lewis Mumford Andrew Rubenfeld by George Platt Lynes. Courtesy Estate of George Platt Lynes. Special thanks to: Eugenia Bell, Jane Photograph of the Museum of Modern Garvie, Caroline Green, Dieter Janssen, Art courtesy of the Museum of Modern Therese Kelly, Mark Lamster, Anne Art, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • The Past and Present of Soviet Constructivism The
    BOLSHEVISM IN BRICK AND CONCRETE: THE PAST AND PRESENT OF SOVIET CONSTRUCTIVISM DOI 10.15826/qr.2016.3.173 УДК 72/036(063)+72/038/11+72.035.93+725.1(470-25) THE 4TH CIAM CONGRESS IN MOSCOW. PREPARATION AND FAILURE (1928–1933)* ** 2 Thomas Flierl Independent Researcher, Berlin, Germany At the first meeting in Zurich I said right away that I could not imagine a Congress without the participation of the Russians. Letter by Sigfried Giedion to El Lissitzky. 21 May 1928. GTA archive. Zurich The paper deals with the dramatic story of the preparation for (and subsequent failure of) the 4th Congrès internationaux d’architecture moderne (CIAM) conference in Moscow. The offer to host the congress in Moscow was made in 1929, with the planned topic ‘Urban Organisation, Urban Construction, and Regional Planning’. Had it taken place in 1930 or 1931, the planned congress would have had an enormous impact. It probably would have been able to counteract the split of the modern urban construction movement into two factions, with those in favour of reconstructing existing cities on the one hand and proponents of building brand new cities on the other. It is widely believed that the congress was moved from Moscow to Athens due to CIAM’s protest against the results of the competition for the Palace of Soviets. Indeed, the controversy over this contest certainly delayed the congress. However, the study of the archival sources shows that the postponement was a result of a drastic change in the USSR’s domestic policies, which took place before CIAM challenged the results of the competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Architecture & Ideology: Modernism As a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union
    Momentum Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 6 2018 Modern Architecture & Ideology: Modernism as a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union Robert Levine University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/momentum Recommended Citation Levine, Robert (2018) "Modern Architecture & Ideology: Modernism as a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union," Momentum: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/momentum/vol5/iss1/6 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/momentum/vol5/iss1/6 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Architecture & Ideology: Modernism as a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union Abstract This paper examines the role of architecture in the promotion of political ideologies through the study of modern architecture in the 20th century. First, it historicizes the development of modern architecture and establishes the style as a tool to convey progressive thought; following this perspective, the paper examines Swedish Functionalism and Constructivism in the Soviet Union as two case studies exploring how politicians react to modern architecture and the ideas that it promotes. In Sweden, Modernism’s ideals of moving past “tradition,” embracing modernity, and striving to improve life were in lock step with the folkhemmet, unleashing the nation from its past and ushering it into the future. In the Soviet Union, on the other hand, these ideals represented an ideological threat to Stalin’s totalitarian state. This thesis or dissertation is available in Momentum: https://repository.upenn.edu/momentum/vol5/iss1/6 Levine: Modern Architecture & Ideology Modern Architecture & Ideology Modernism as a Political Tool in Sweden and the Soviet Union Robert Levine, University of Pennsylvania C'17 Abstract This paper examines the role of architecture in the promotion of political ideologies through the study of modern architecture in the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Building in Early Medieval Rome, 500-1000 AD
    BUILDING IN EARLY MEDIEVAL ROME, 500 - 1000 AD Robert Coates-Stephens PhD, Archaeology Institute of Archaeology, University College London ProQuest Number: 10017236 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10017236 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract The thesis concerns the organisation and typology of building construction in Rome during the period 500 - 1000 AD. Part 1 - the organisation - contains three chapters on: ( 1) the finance and administration of building; ( 2 ) the materials of construction; and (3) the workforce (including here architects and architectural tracts). Part 2 - the typology - again contains three chapters on: ( 1) ecclesiastical architecture; ( 2 ) fortifications and aqueducts; and (3) domestic architecture. Using textual sources from the period (papal registers, property deeds, technical tracts and historical works), archaeological data from the Renaissance to the present day, and much new archaeological survey-work carried out in Rome and the surrounding country, I have outlined a new model for the development of architecture in the period. This emphasises the periods directly preceding and succeeding the age of the so-called "Carolingian Renaissance", pointing out new evidence for the architectural activity in these supposed dark ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Wielding the Temporal Sword
    WIELDING THE TEMPORAL SWORD AN ANALYSIS OF THE CREATION OF VATICAN CITY STATE IN RELATION TO THE CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVE ON STATEHOOD AND CATHOLIC DOCTRINE ON THE RELATION BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE Master Thesis Political Theory Guido As August 15th 2016 Supervisor: Prof. dr. M.L.J. Wissenburg Abstract The Lateran Treaty of 1929 between Italy and the Roman Catholic Church constitutes the creation of Vatican City State. This thesis gives an account of the negotiations leading up to the signing of the Treaty. The creation of the City State draws our attention to two specific concepts: statehood and the separation of Church and state. The Catholic perspective on these concepts is presented and compared to other dominant theories of the concepts The Catholic perception of statehood in the early 20th century was based on the work of Fr. Taparelli, a Jesuit scholar who was heavily inspired by Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274). The thesis concludes that there is a discrepancy between this theoretical conception of statehood, and the creation of Vatican City State. This can be explained by the fact that obtaining statehood was instrumental to the Holy See’s ambition of becoming sovereign. Catholic doctrine on the relation between Church and state has always rejected the idea of a full separation. Papal teachings have traditionally promoted a differentiation between a spiritual and temporal sphere of power, each supreme in its own domain, but cooperating in harmony. Depending on one´s interpretation, the creation of Vatican City is in line with this doctrine. Key words: Lateran Treaty, Vatican City State, separation of Church and State, statehood, sovereignty 2 Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Boym 1. Model for the Monument to the Third International, November
    LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS boym 1. Model for The Monument to the Third International, November 1920 62 2. Vladimir Tatlin, trying Letatlin (Moscow, 1932) 67 3. Sketch for the set decoration of Chalice of Joy (1949–50) 68 4. Vladimir Tatlin, White Jar and Potato (1948–51) 69 5. Vladimir Tatlin, A Skull on the Open Book (1948–53) 69 6. Model of Tatlin’s Tower 70 7. Constantin Boym, Palace of the Soviets and Tatlin’s Tower (1996) 71 8. Leonid Sokov, Moscow Yard 72 9. Leonid Sokov, Watchtower: Self-portrait as a Soldier 74 10. Leonid Sokov, Ur-Neo-Geo Tower 74 11. Yuri Avvakumov, Perestroika Tower (1990) 76 12. Ilya Kabakov, sketch for The Palace of the Projects (1999) 77 13. Ilya Kabakov, sketch for The Palace of the Projects (1999) 78 14. Svetlana Boym, ‘‘Return Home,’’ from Nostalgic Technologies 80 15. Tatlin’s Letatlin and Nabokov’s Butterfly from Hybrid Utopias (2003–6) 81 16. Tatlin’s Letatlin and Nabokov’s Butterfly from Hybrid Utopias (2003–6) 82 17. Tatlin’s Letatlin and Nabokov’s Butterfly from Hybrid Utopias (2003–6) 82 eshel 1. Deserted, cemented-up houses in Haifa’s Arab quarter 138 2. Igal Shtayim, Untitled 139 3. Nava Semel, ‘‘Le’vad’’ (Alone) 140 4. Facsimile of first page of Kluge, ‘‘Der Luftangri√ auf Halberstadt am 8. April 1945’’ 145 hell 1. Gustave Doré, The New Zealander 173 2. Adolf Hitler with the Italian king in Rome 184 3. The Mosaic Room in Albert Speer’s Chancellery, Berlin 187 beasley-murray 1. Vilcashuamán 218 2.
    [Show full text]
  • TWO REGIMES, TWO UNIVERSITY CITIES Architectonic Language and Ideology in Lithuania and Portugal: 1930-1975
    TWO REGIMES, TWO UNIVERSITY CITIES Architectonic language and ideology in Lithuania and Portugal: 1930-1975 Neringa Sobeščukaitė Dissertation of the Integrated Master’s Degree in Architecture supervised by Professor Nuno Alberto Leite Rodrigues Grande Department of Architecture, FCTUC, July 2013 TWO REGIMES, TWO UNIVERSITY CITIES Architectonic language and ideology in Lithuania and Portugal: 1930-1975 The author would like to thank numerous persons for their varied help, advice and encouragement, without whom research on this subject would have been impossible, if not at least much less comfortable or entertain- ing. These persons include but are not limited by colleagues from Kaunas Art Faculty of the Vilnius Academy of Fine Arts and Department of Architecture of the University of Coimbra. In particular, the author would like to thank: Miguel Godinho, Pedro Silva, João Briosa, Theresa Büscher, Monika Intaitė, Joana Orêncio, Lara Maminka Borges, Vânia Simões, Nuno Nina Martins, Magdalena Mozūraitytė, Jautra Bernotaitė, and Andrius Ropolas, for their support, and helpful hints along the way. The specificity of this work would not have been possible without the personal experience and academic for- mation in two institutions: Kaunas Art Faculty of the Vilnius Academy of Fine Arts, the university where the author finished its Bachelor degree, and Department of Architecture of the University of Coimbra, the current place of studies of the author. In this contex, the author would like to express the deepest gratitude to all pro- fessors and colleagues, for their help and support, for their brief discussions to deep, sometimes all night long conversations, that helped to feel at home, even when being half-way across the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceaușescu's Bucharest
    Ceaușescu’s Bucharest: Power, Architecture and National Identity By Vlad Moghioroși Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Constantin Iordachi Second reader: Professor Balázs Trencsényi CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection i Abstract The thesis analyzes Nicolae Ceaușescu’s redesign of Bucharest as part of the Romanian dictator’s national communism and cult of personality. The symbol of this cult and manifestation of nationalism was the Bucharest Political-Administrative Center. Scholars generally agree that an analysis of the continuation of nationalism in Romanian planning and architecture in the twentieth century is crucial for understanding Ceaușescu’s project for Bucharest. As such, the aim of this thesis is to brings a new perspective on the influence of Romanian 20th century planning and architecture on the construction of the Bucharest Political-Administrative Center. It also offers a new interpretation of the decision-making process behind the construction of the communist center. Using party archives, I argue that although nationalism continued to be used in Romanian planning and architecture after the communist takeover, the Ceaușescu regime differed significantly from both the Gheorghiu- Dej regime and the interwar period.
    [Show full text]
  • Chamayou's Manhunts
    THE FUNAMBULIST PAPERS VOLUME 2 26 GUEST WRITERS ESSAYS FOR THE FUNAMBULIST CURATED AND EDITED BY LÉOPOLD LAMBERT HANNA BAUMANN / ALEX SHAMS / ERIN MANNING MIMI THI NGUYEN / PHILIPPE THEOPHANIDIS INA KARKANI / JOANNE POUZENC / STUART ELDEN NANDITA BISWAS MELLAMPHY / SARAH CHOUKAH SOPHIA AZEB / ELENA LOIZIDOU / ALAN PROHM GRÉGOIRE CHAMAYOU / CHRYSANTHI NIGIANNI SOFIA LEMOS / LOREDANA MICU / DEREK GREGORY PEDRO HERNÁNDEZ MARTÍNEZ / DAN MELLAMPHY NICK AXEL / ADRIENNE HART / RENISA MAWANI TINGS CHAK / SEHER SHAH / GASTÓN GORDILLO ANDREAS PHILIPPOPOULOS - MIHALOPOULOS THE FUNAMBULIST PAPERS: VOLUME 02 © Léopold Lambert, 2015. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is Open Access, which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for commercial gain in any form whatsoever, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build upon the work outside of its normal use in academic scholarship without express permission of the author and the publisher of this volume. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. First published in 2015 by The Funambulist + CTM Documents Initiative an imprint of punctum books Brooklyn, New York http://punctumbooks.com ISBN-13: 978-0692423240 ISBN-10: 0692423249 Cover artwork specifically created by Loredana Micu (2015). Cover design by the editor (2015). This book is the product of many people’s work: a very grate- ful thank you to Eileen Joy, Anna Klosowska, Ed Keller, Hiroko Nakatani, Loredana Micu, Mimi Thi Nguyen, Philippe Theophani- dis, Hanna Baumann, Sophia Azeb, Derek Gregory, Stuart Elden, Gastón Gordillo, Pedro Hernández Martínez, Tings Chak, Alex Shams, Sofia Lemos, Grégoire Chamayou, Renisa Mawani, Nick Axel, Sarah Choukah, Alan Prohm, Erin Manning, Adrienne Hart, Joanne Pouzenc, Elena Loizidou, Chrysanthi Nigianni, Ina Kar- kani, Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Dan Mellamphy, and Nandita Biswas Mellamphy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Humanism and Honour in the Making of Alessandro Farnese 35
    6 RENAISSANCE HISTORY, ART AND CULTURE Cussen Pope Paul III and the Cultural Politics of Reform of Politics Cultural the and III Paul Pope Bryan Cussen Pope Paul III and the Cultural Politics of Reform 1534-1549 Pope Paul III and the Cultural Politics of Reform Renaissance History, Art and Culture This series investigates the Renaissance as a complex intersection of political and cultural processes that radiated across Italian territories into wider worlds of influence, not only through Western Europe, but into the Middle East, parts of Asia and the Indian subcontinent. It will be alive to the best writing of a transnational and comparative nature and will cross canonical chronological divides of the Central Middle Ages, the Late Middle Ages and the Early Modern Period. Renaissance History, Art and Culture intends to spark new ideas and encourage debate on the meanings, extent and influence of the Renaissance within the broader European world. It encourages engagement by scholars across disciplines – history, literature, art history, musicology, and possibly the social sciences – and focuses on ideas and collective mentalities as social, political, and cultural movements that shaped a changing world from ca 1250 to 1650. Series editors Christopher Celenza, Georgetown University, USA Samuel Cohn, Jr., University of Glasgow, UK Andrea Gamberini, University of Milan, Italy Geraldine Johnson, Christ Church, Oxford, UK Isabella Lazzarini, University of Molise, Italy Pope Paul III and the Cultural Politics of Reform 1534-1549 Bryan Cussen Amsterdam University Press Cover image: Titian, Pope Paul III. Museo di Capodimonte, Naples, Italy / Bridgeman Images. Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout isbn 978 94 6372 252 0 e-isbn 978 90 4855 025 8 doi 10.5117/9789463722520 nur 685 © B.
    [Show full text]