DOCSLIB.ORG

Choose the Answer That Makes This Statement True

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Choose the Answer That Makes This Statement True OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI1 Choose the answer that makes this statement true. 1 4 The product of x is … 3 5 1 a) greater than 3 1 b) less than 3 Explain your answer. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 1 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI2 Choose the answer that makes this statement true. 5 The product of 3 X is… 4 a) greater than 3 b) less than 3€ Explain your answer. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 2 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI3 5 Is the product of 16 x greater than 16 or less than 16? 8 Explain your answer. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 3 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI4 2 5 Stephanie and Paige are discussing the answer to 3 x . 7 9 2 Stephanie said that the answer is greater than 3 . 7 2 Paige said the answer is less than 3 . 7 Who is correct? Explain your answer. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 4 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI5 1 2 Is the product of 2 x 2 greater than 5 or less than 5? 2 5 Explain your answer. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 5 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI6 Choose the answer that makes this statement true. ! 5 The product of 1 x 2 is closest to… ! 6 5 a) 2 8 b) 5 c) 6 30 d) 24 Explain your answer. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 6 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI7 Choose the answer that makes this statement true. 2 5 The product of x is closest to… 5 8 a) 0 b) 1 c) 10 d) 40 Explain your answer. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 7 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI8 Choose the answer that makes this statement true. 3 The product of X 12 is closest to… 10 a) 1 b) 4 c) 10 d) 36 Explain your answer. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 8 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI9 Place each expression in the correct boX. �� � � � � � x x x � � � �� � � � � � Less than Equal to Greater than � � � Explain your answers. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 9 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI10 Place each expression in the correct boX. � � � x 12 12 x �� x � � � Less than 12 Equal to 12 Greater than 12 Explain your answers. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 10 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI11 Make each statement true using the greater than (>), less than (<), or equal to (=) sign. ! ! A) 476 x 476 x ! □ ! Explain your answer ! ! B) 476 x 476 x ! □ ! Explain your answer © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 11 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI12 Make each statement true using the greater than (>), less than (<), or equal to (=) sign. ! ! A) x 125 125 x ! □ ! Explain your answer ! ! B) 125 x 125 x ! □ ! Explain your answer © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 12 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI13 Determine whether each statement is true or false. Mark the appropriate boX in the table. Then, eXplain your reasoning. True False ! 1) 250 x is less than 250. ! Explain your reasoning. ! ! 2) 250 x is greater than 250 x . ! ! Explain your reasoning. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 13 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI14 Determine whether each statement is true or false. Mark the appropriate boX in the table. Then, eXplain your reasoning. True False ! 1) 325 x is less than 325. ! Explain your reasoning. ! ! 2) 325 x is greater than 325 x . ! ! Explain your reasoning. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 14 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI15 Select Yes or No to indicate whether each fraction can be placed in the box to make the statement below true. ! ! x ! □< ! Yes No Explain your answer 3 4 4 3 3 3 © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 15 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI16 Select Yes or No to indicate whether each fraction can be placed in the box to make the statement below true. ! ! x ! □< ! Yes No Explain your answer 9 4 4 9 9 9 © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 16 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI17 ! Anna has a tree in her yard. Joseph has a tree that is 1 times as tall as Anna’s ! ! tree. Helen has a tree that is as tall as Anna’s tree. ! Label each of the trees below to tell which tree belongs to which person. Explain your choices. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 17 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI18 Three friends each bought a box of chocolates. ! Hope’s box of chocolates is the length of June’s box of chocolates. Erika’s box of ! ! chocolates is 1 times the length of Hope’s box of chocolates. ! Label each box of chocolates with the owner’s name. Explain your choices. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 18 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI19 Place each expression in the correct boX. � � � � � � x x 2 x � � � � � � � � � Less than Equal to Greater than � � � Explain your answers. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 19 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI20 Place each expression in the correct boX. �� � � x 12 12 x 12 x � � � Less than 12 Equal to 12 Greater than 12 Explain your answers. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 20 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI21 Determine whether each statement is true or false. Mark the appropriate boX in the table. Then, eXplain your reasoning. True False ! ! 1) 250 x is greater than 250 x . ! ! Explain your reasoning. ! ! 2) 250 x is less than 125 x . ! ! Explain your reasoning. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 21 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) OGAP Fractions [NAME _____________________________ DATE ___________] MI22 Determine whether each statement is true or false. Mark the appropriate boX in the table. Then, eXplain your reasoning. True False ! ! 1) 325 x is less than 250 x . ! ! Explain your reasoning. ! ! 2) 325 x is greater than 370 x . ! ! Explain your reasoning. © 2013 Marge Petit, E. Hulbert, and R. Laird. A derivative product of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing 22 Assessment Project funded by NSF (Award Number EHR-0227057) and the US DOE (S366A0200002)) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notes and References Documents Held at the Public Record Office, London, Are Crown Copyright and Are Reproduced by Permission of the Controller Ofhm Stationery Office
    Notes and References Documents held at the Public Record Office, London, are crown copyright and are reproduced by permission of the Controller ofHM Stationery Office. I NTRODUCTION Christopher Andrew and David Dilks I. David Dilks (ed.), The Diaries rifSir Alexander Cadogan O.M. 1938-1945 (Lon­ don , (971) , p. 21. 2. Interview with Professor Hinsley in Part 3 of the BBC Radio 4 documentary series 'T he Profession of Intelligence', written and presented by Christopher Andrew (producer Peter Everett); first broadcast 16 Aug 1981. 3. F. H. Hinsleyet al., British Intelligencein the Second World War (London, 1979-). The first two chapters of volume I contain a useful retrospect on the pre-war development of the intelligence community. Curiously, despite the publication of Professor Hinsley's volumes, the government has decided not to release the official histories commissioned by it on wartime counter-espionage and deception. The forthcoming (non-official) collection of essays edited by Ernest R. May, Knowing One's Enemies: IntelligenceAssessment before the Two World Wars (Princeton) promises to add significantly to our knowledge of the role of intelligence on the eve of the world wars. 4. House of Commons Education, Science and Arts Committee (Session 1982-83) , Public Records: Minutes ofEvidence, pp . 76-7. 5. Chapman Pincher, Their Trade is Treachery (London, 1981). Nigel West, A Matter of Trust: MI51945-72 (London, 1982). Both volumes contain ample evidence of extensive 'inside information'. 6. Nigel West , MI5: British Security Operations /90/-/945 (London, 1981), pp . 41, 49, 58. One of the most interesting studies of British peacetime intelligence which depends on a substantial amount of inside information is Antony Verrier's history of post-war British foreign policy , Through the Looking Glass (London, 1983) .
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan-Specific Reporting Requirements
    Version: February 28, 2020 MEDICARE-MEDICAID CAPITATED FINANCIAL ALIGNMENT MODEL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: MICHIGAN-SPECIFIC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Issued February 28, 2020 MI-1 Version: February 28, 2020 Table of Contents Michigan-Specific Reporting Requirements Appendix ......................................... MI-3 Introduction ....................................................................................................... MI-3 Definitions .......................................................................................................... MI-3 Variations from the Core Reporting Requirements Document ..................... MI-4 Quality Withhold Measures .............................................................................. MI-5 Reporting on Assessments and IICSPs Completed Prior to First Effective Enrollment Date ................................................................................. MI-6 Guidance on Assessments and IICSPs for Members with a Break in Coverage ............................................................................................................ MI-6 Reporting on Passively Enrolled and Opt-In Enrolled Members .................. MI-8 Reporting on Disenrolled and Retro-disenrolled Members ........................... MI-9 Hybrid Sampling ................................................................................................ MI-9 Value Sets ........................................................................................................ MI-10 Michigan’s Implementation, Ongoing,
    [Show full text]
  • Monday/Tuesday Playoff Schedule
    2013 TUC MONDAY/TUESDAY PLAYOFF MASTER FIELD SCHEDULE Start End Hockey1 Hockey2 Hockey3 Hockey4 Hockey5 Ulti A Soccer 3A Soccer 3B Cricket E1 Cricket E2 Cricket N1 Cricket N2 Field X 8:00 9:15 MI13 MI14 TI13 TI14 TI15 TI16 MI1 MI2 MI3 MI4 MI15 MI16 9:20 10:35 MI17 MI18 TI17 TI18 TI19 TI20 MI5 MI6 10:40 11:55 MI19 MI20 MC1 MC2 MC3 MI21 MI7 MI8 12:00 1:15 MI9* TI21* TI22 TI23 TI24 MI10 MI11 MI12 1:20 2:35 MI22 MC4 MC6 MC5 MI23 TC1 MI24 MI25 2:40 3:55 TI1 TI2 MC7 TI3 MI26 TC2 TR1 TR2 MI27 4:00 5:15 MC8* TC3 MC10 MC9 TI4 TC4 TR3 TR4 5:20 6:35 TC5* TI5 TI6 TI7 TI8 TC6 TR5 TR6 6:40 7:55 TI9* TC7 TI10 TI11 TI12 TC8 TR8 TR7 Games are to 15 points Half time at 8 points Games are 1 hour and 15 minutes long Soft cap is 10 minutes before the end of game, +1 to highest score 2 Timeouts per team, per game NO TIMEOUTS AFTER SOFT CAP Footblocks not allowed, unless captains agree otherwise 2013 TUC Monday Competitive Playoffs - 1st to 7th Place 3rd Place Bracket Loser of MC4 Competitive Teams Winner of MC9 MC9 Allth Darth (1) Allth Darth (1) 3rd Place Slam Dunks (2) Loser of MC5 The Ligers (3) Winner of MC4 MC4 Krash Kart (4) Krash Kart (4) The El Guapo Sausage Party (5) MC1 Wonky Pooh (6) Winner of MC1 Disc Horde (7) The El Guapo Sausage Winner of MC8 Party (5) MC8 Slam Dunks (2) Champions Winner of MC2 MC2 Disc Horde (7) MC5 The Ligers (3) Winner of MC5 MC3 Winner of MC3 Wonky Pooh (6) Time Hockey3 Score Spirit Hockey4 Score Spirit Hockey5 Score Spirit Score Spirit 10:40 Krash Kart (4) Slam Dunks (2) The Ligers (3) to vs.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights Into Survival Trend Analyses in Cancer Population-Based Studies: the SUDCAN Methodology - Supplementary Data
    New insights into survival trend analyses in cancer population-based studies: the SUDCAN methodology - Supplementary data European Journal of Cancer Prevention, December 2016 Table S1. Finally selected models for trend analyses by country and cancer site Cancer site France Italy Spain Switzerland Belgium Portugal Breast MI4 MI6 a MI6 MI2 MG5 MG3 Cervix uteri M0 ML2 MI1 M0 M0 MI3 Colon MI3 MI6 MI3 MI2 MI3 MI3 Corpus uteri MG1 MG3 MG3 ML1 ML1 MG1 Head-neck MI6 MI3 MG3 MI5 ML4 MG3 Kidney ML1 ML3 ML4 MG1 MI2 M0 Liver MI3 MI6 MI2 MI1 MI4 MI3 Lung MG3 MI6 MI6 MI2 MG3 MI3 Oesophagus MG1 MI6 b MI1 MG2 MG6 MG2 Ovary MI5 MI6 MI3 MG6 MI3 MI2 Pancreas MI6 MI3 ML3 ML2 MI3 MI3 Prostate MI4 MI5 MI5 ML1 MI2 MI3 Rectum MI2 MI1 MG1 MG1 ML2 MI2 Skin melanoma MG1 ML4 ML1 MG4 MG2 MG2 Stomach MG6 MI6 MG1 MG1 ML6 MI2 a The model was extended with 2 knots for g(y) and 2 knots for s(a) and n(a) . b Model MI6 was forced, the initially selected model was MG6. Table S2. Does the effect of the year of diagnosis vary with age? Cancer site France Italy Spain Switzerland Belgium Portugal Breast Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Cervix uteri No effect Yes Yes No effect No effect Yes Colon Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Corpus uteri No No No Yes Yes No Head-neck Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Kidney Yes Yes Yes No Yes No effect Liver Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lung No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Oesophagus No Yes Yes No No No Ovary Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Pancreas Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Prostate Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Rectum Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Skin melanoma No Yes Yes No No No Stomach No Yes No No Yes Yes Table S3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Tuc Monday/Tuesday Playoff Master Field Schedule
    2014 TUC MONDAY/TUESDAY PLAYOFF MASTER FIELD SCHEDULE Start End Hockey 1 Hockey 2 Hockey 3 Hockey 4 Hockey 5 Hockey 6 Ulti A Rugby E1 Rugby E2 9:20 10:35 MI1 MI2 MC1 MC2 MI8 MI9 10:40 11:55 MI3 MI4 MC5 MC3 MC4 MI11 MI5 MI10 12:00 1:15 MI6 MI7 MC7 1:30 2:55 ASI1 ASI2 ASC1 ASC2 MC6 3:00 4:25 ASI3 ASI4 ASC4 ASC3 4:30 5:45 T5 T6 T2 T1 5:50 7:05 T7 T8 T4 T3 TOURNAMENT RULES Games are to 15 points Half time at 8 points Playoff games are 1 hour and 15 minutes long Hard cap is at 75 minutes (finish the point, only if tied do you play another), and there is no soft cap. 1 Timeout per half, per team (no timeouts if in overtime) Footblocks are not allowed, unless captains agree otherwise 2014 TUC Monday Competitive Playoffs - 1st to 6th Place Teams 3rd Place Deep (1) Deep (1) L - MC3 Allth Darth (2) 3rd Place MC7 naptime (3) W - MC3 MC3 Slam Dunks (4) Slam Dunks (4) L - MC4 El Guapo (5) MC1 Basic Bishes (6) W - MC1 5th Place El Guapo (5) Champions L - MC1 MC6 5th Place MC5 Allth Darth (2) L - MC2 MC4 naptime (3) W - MC4 MC2 W - MC2 Basic Bishes (6) Time Hockey 4 Score Spirit Hockey 6 Score Spirit 9:20 Slam Dunks (4) naptime (3) to vs. MC 1 vs. MC 2 10:35 El Guapo (5) Basic Bishes (6) Time Hockey 4 Score Spirit Hockey 6 Score Spirit Hockey 3 Score Spirit 10:40 Deep (1) Allth Darth (2) L - MC1 to vs.
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) r'.;, „T f3 I FAR-FIELD RADIATION PATTERNS OF APERTURE ANTENNAS BY THE WINOGRAD FOURIER TRANSFORM ALGORITHM Rodney Heisler School of Engineering Wa1111 Walla College (N.ASA-CR-159911) FAR-FIELD RADIATION N79-16171 PATTERNS OF APERTURE ANTENNAS BY THE WINOGRAD FOURIER TRANSFORM ALGORITHM (Walla Walla College, College Place) 46 p HC Unclas A03/MF A01 CSCL 20N G3/32 43309 NAB 5-25063 October 1978 GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GREENBELT, !.MARYLAND 20771 "t FAR-FIELD RADIATION PATTERNS OF APERTURE ANTENNAS BY'riiL WINOGRAD FOURIER TRANSFORM ALGORITHM Rodney Heisler School of Engineering ¢ Walla walla College ABSTRACT The far-field radiation pattern of an antenna may be determined as the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the aperture distribution. when the antenna is electrically large and a detailed pattern in two dimensions is required, computer run-times exceeding an hour may result.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Touchscreen and Mouse Input Performance by People with and Without Upper Body Motor Impairments
    Accessibility CHI 2017, May 6–11, 2017, Denver, CO, USA Comparing Touchscreen and Mouse Input Performance by People With and Without Upper Body Motor Impairments Leah Findlater1, Karyn Moffatt3, Jon E. Froehlich2, Meethu Malu2, Joan Zhang2 1,2Human-Computer Interaction Lab 3ACT Research Group 1College of Information Studies | 2Dept. of Computer Science School of Information Studies University of Maryland, College Park, MD McGill University, Montreal, QC [email protected], {jonf, meethu}@cs.umd.edu, [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Controlled studies of touchscreen input performance for users with upper body motor impairments remain relatively Pointing Crossing sparse. To address this gap, we present a controlled lab study of mouse vs. touchscreen performance with 32 participants (16 with upper body motor impairments and 16 without). Our Steering study examines: (1) how touch input compares to an indirect Dragging pointing device (a mouse); (2) how performance compares Figure 1. Cropped screenshots of the four study tasks, showing a range of orientations, target widths, and amplitudes. across a range of standard interaction techniques; and (3) how these answers differ for users with and without motor Despite the above body of work, controlled studies of impairments. While the touchscreen was faster than the touchscreen input performance for people with upper body mouse overall, only participants without motor impairments motor impairments are relatively sparse. Studies have benefited from a lower error rate on the touchscreen. Indeed, compared novel techniques (e.g., swabbing [17]) to a control participants with motor impairments had a three-fold condition such as tapping [9,10,17,20], but do not shed light increase in pointing (tapping) errors on the touchscreen on more general questions related to device comparisons compared to the mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • British Intelligence Analysis and the German Army at the Battle of Broodseinde, 4 October 1917
    School of History and Cultures A Planned Massacre? British Intelligence Analysis and the German Army at the Battle of Broodseinde, 4 October 1917 By John Freeman Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham In partial fulfilment for the degree of M Phil in Twentieth-Century British History School of History and Cultures July 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Contents Acknowledgements Introduction p. 1 Chapter I. The Build-Up to the Battle of Broodseinde, 4 October 1917. p. 6 Introduction p. 7 The War Office p. 8 GHQ p. 14 The Armies p. 20 The Corps p. 26 The Divisions p. 31 The Intelligence Corps p. 35 Conclusion p. 41 Chapter II. Broodseinde: the Day by Day Intelligence Picture. p. 43 Introduction p. 44 28 September 1917 p. 45 29 September 1917 p. 49 30 September 1917 p. 52 1 October 1917 p. 57 2 October 1917 p. 62 3 October 1917 p. 67 Conclusion p. 71 Bibliography p. 74 Acknowledgements This study would not have been possible without the help of Gary Sheffield, Michael LoCicero and John Bourne.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Game Schedule
    Mooresville Baseball League - 2021 Game Schedule Baseball MINOR ROOKIE PEEWEE INSTRUCTIONAL MAJOR Softball STB 7-8U (CP) 9-10U (KP) 11-12U (S) Opening Day - April 17 May 17 - May 22 Diamond Diamond Date Day Time Date Day Time 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 9:00 IN1-IN2 IN3-IN8 MA1-MA2 MA3-MA5 IN4-IN7 17-May Mon 6:00 S1-S2 IN2-IN7 MA5-MA1 MA2-MA4 MI2 - MI5 11:00 MI2 - MI1 MI3 - MI8 MI4 - MI7 MI5 - MI6 STB1-STB2 18-May Tue 6:00 MI2 - MI1 MI3 - MI8 MI4 - MI7 MI5 - MI6 17-Apr Sat 1:00 PW1-PW2 PW3-PW10 PW4-PW9 PW5-PW8 PW6-PW7 19-May Wed 6:00 S2-S3 IN3-IN6 MA2-MA5 MA4-MA3 PW2-PW9 3:00 R1-R4 R2-R3 CP1-CP2 CP3-CP4 KP1-KP2 20-May Thu 6:00 MI3 - MI4 MI1 - MI7 MI8 - MI6 MI2 - MI5 5:00 KP3-KP4 IN5-IN6 STB3-STB4 STB5-STB6 21-May Fri 6:00 CP2-CP3 CP4-CP1 KP1-KP2 KP3-KP4 9:00 IN4-IN5 IN8-IN1 STB3-STB6 STB4-STB1 April 19 - April 24 11:00 R3-R1 R4-R2 STB2-STB5 Diamond 22-May Sat 1:00 PW3-PW8 PW1-PW10 PW5-PW6 PW4-PW7 Date Day Time 1 2 3 4 5 6 3:00 19-Apr Mon 6:00 S1-S2 R1-R4 MA3-MA2 MA4-MA1 5:00 20-Apr Tue 6:00 Cancel Cancel Cancel Cancel 21-Apr Wed 6:00 Cancel Cancel Cancel Cancel May 24 - May 29 22-Apr Thu 6:00 S2-S3 R2-R3 MA1-MA3 MA5-MA4 IN8-IN6 Diamond Date Day Time 23-Apr Fri 6:00 PW2-PW3 PW1-PW7 PW8-PW6 PW9-PW5 PW10-PW4 1 2 3 4 5 6 9:00 IN3-IN4 IN2-IN5 STB1-STB6 STB2-STB4 IN1-IN7 24-May Mon 6:00 S3-S1 KP2-KP3 MA1-MA2 MA3-MA5 STB2-STB4 11:00 R1-R2 R3-R4 STB3-STB5 PW7-PW8 PW5-PW10 25-May Tue 6:00 MI6 - MI2 MI7 - MI8 MI4 - MI1 MI5 - MI3 STB1-STB6 24-Apr Sat 1:00 CP3-CP1 CP2-CP4 PW3-PW1 PW4-PW2 26-May Wed 6:00 S1-S2 KP4-KP1 MA3-MA2 MA4-MA1 3:00 27-May Thu 6:00
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Diversity of the Terrestrial Invertebrate Fauna of Antarctica: a Closer Look at the Stereotydeus (Acari: Prostigmata) Genus
    Investigating the diversity of the terrestrial invertebrate fauna of Antarctica: a closer look at the Stereotydeus (Acari: Prostigmata) genus Claudia Brunetti 1,*, Henk Siepel 2, Pietro Paolo Fanciulli 1, Francesco Nardi 1 and Antonio Carapelli 1 1 Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro 2, 53100 SI Siena, Italy; 2 Department of Animal Ecology and Physiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Abstract: In the extreme Antarctic ecosystems, plants and invertebrates are confine to sparse and isolated ice-free refugia where they survived for millions of years and where they undergo differentiation and population divergence, potentially resulting in speciation. In invertebrates' populations, the gene flow is strongly affected and reduce by their limited dispersal abilities, their specific habitat requirements and the substantial geographical barriers. And thus, results in high genetic differentiation between clusters of individuals. Mites are surely the predominant invertebrate group of Continental Antarctica and the free-living genus Stereotydeus Berlese, 1901 (Acari: Prostigmata) is one of the most abundant along the coastal zones of Victoria Land and the Transantarctic Mountains. To examine the biodiversity and the phylogeographic distribution ranges of Stereotydeus spp. across Victoria Land, we conducted an integrated analysis of the genus through morphological, phylogenetic and population genetics studies. The results suggest a possible common evolutionary history in several isolated glacial refugia, with scarce gene flow even within populations probably resulting from inter/intra-specific events influenced by several abiotic/biotic factors. Keywords: Victoria Land; molecular phylogeny; biogeography; Acari; Stereotydeus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • MBT FAQ Index
    MBT FAQ Index *Words surrounded by quotation marks are defined in the MBT statute* A Accounting Methods Actual or Annual A8, A11, A31, C33, U28, M55 Cash or Accrual C32, C40, M16, M33, U17, U21 Accounts Receivable Factoring Companies B30, M54 “Active Shareholder” C3, C20 “Actively Solicits” Ap4, B11, F1, N2, N4, N5, N6, N7, N8, N10, N11, U12 Actual Method, Computation of Tax for First Taxable Year Less Than 12 Months A8, A11 Amended Returns C9, C13 Annual Method, Computation of Tax for First Taxable Year Less Than 12 Months A8, A11, A31 Annual Returns A6, A7, A10, A11, A14, A17, A20, Fi6 Apportionment Ap1, Ap2, Ap3, Ap5, M2, M5, N1, N4, N5, U3, U5 Arts and Culture Credit C15, C26 Associations (Condominiums, Homeowners and Timeshares) Mi29 B “Base Investment” Fi8 Book Tax Difference B5, B6, Mi9 Bottle Deposit Administration Credit C34, Mi33, M55 Brother-Sister Corporations U7, U9, U24, U25, U33, U34 Brownfield Rehabilitation Credit C7, C8, C9, C13, C24, C26, U22 “Business Activity” Ap1, Ap2, Ap5, B4, B7, B20, B21, B29, B30, M2, M10, M11, M40, M42, M52, M54 “Business Income” A22, A25, Ap2, B2, B3, B4, B7, B12, B14, B16, B18, B20, B21, B22, B23, B29, B30, M10, M11, M12, M13, M27, M38, M40, M42, M43, M44, M52, M54 Business Income Tax Base Administrative A14 Calculation A22, A25, A27, B10, B12, B19, B22, B27, B29, C14, C33, Mi20, M15, M27, M36, M38, M42, M55, N9 Included Ap2, B4, B8, B20, B21, B28, M10, M11, M40, M49, M54 Deduction B2, B3, B5, B6, B18, B27, Mi9, Mi10 Unitary Business Group U5, U27, U32 Business Loss, MBT B10, M15, M36, U27
    [Show full text]
  • Magmas Erupted During the Main Pulse of Siberian Traps Volcanism
    J OURNAL OF Journal of Petrology, 2015, Vol. 56, No. 11, 2089–2116 doi: 10.1093/petrology/egv064 P ETROLOGY Original Article Magmas Erupted during the Main Pulse of Siberian Traps Volcanism were Volatile-poor Svetlana Sibik1*, Marie Edmonds1, John Maclennan1 2 and Henrik Svensen Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/petrology/article/56/11/2089/2375416 by guest on 28 September 2021 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK and 2Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1027 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Received February 11, 2015; Accepted October 19, 2015 ABSTRACT The eruption of the Siberian Traps Large Igneous Province (SLIP) at the Permo-Triassic boundary was synchronous with environmental degradation and the largest known mass extinction in the geological record. The volatile emissions associated with these eruptions have been linked to the environmental change yet we understand little of their source and magnitude and how they varied with time. There are a number of possible sources for the volatiles that were emitted during the eruptions: the mantle (including metasomatized lithosphere), volatile-rich sediments (through metamorphism or direct assimilation) and the crustal basement. To assess the relative importance of these sources (with the exception of the metamorphic outgassing source), we have conducted a geochemical study of melt inclusions hosted by clinopyroxene in Siberian Traps low-Ti tholeiitic lavas and sills of the Khakanchansky, Ayansky and Khonnamakitsky Formations. The magmas were not emplaced into or erupted onto evaporite deposits, in contrast to samples studied previ- ously.
    [Show full text]