DOCSLIB.ORG

Manston Airport DCO Application from RSP Ltd: Personal Submission I Am

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manston Airport DCO Application from RSP Ltd: Personal Submission I Am Manston Airport DCO application from RSP Ltd: Personal Submission I am a resident of Ramsgate, living directly under RSP’s proposed flight path, a Town Councillor and a member of several community groups. I object in the strongest terms to the granting of a Development Consent Order to RSP Ltd to run a 24-hour cargo hub at Manston Airport. My principal reasons are: 1) No evidence of need: I understand that a DCO successful application must show an overriding national need, and that this is particularly the case when an application is made concerning property belonging to a third party. I have attended an RSP consultation event, read their documentation and consulted other evidence. From this it is clear to me that RSP’s plans rely substantially on taking business from other airports - so the air cargo capacity on which RSP intend to build their business is already in place, but located elsewhere in the country. Furthermore, Stansted Airport’s Sustainability Plan (#A attached) shows that it is operating effectively on very high volumes but retains considerable spare capacity. From this I conclude that that a DCO will not meet an overwhelming national need as the UK’s needs are already being met/ are capable of being met elsewhere. 2) No evidence of capacity: RSP Ltd is effectively a start-up company seeking to achieve levels of delivery appropriate to a huge corporate. RSP’s website lists the members of its ‘Professional Team’ and ‘Strategic Team’ – but on even cursory examination these simply prove to be either consultancies with whom RSP work or delivery agents such as their lawyers and PR company. If any of the groups I am involved in were to list all their partners, their accountants and their stationery suppliers as members of their ‘team’, not only would the list run to many webpages, but also community members and funders would have a right to assume they all had direct roles in delivering our work, though this would not be so. Of RSP’s six listed Directors, only one has any airport experience. Reports such as that completed by Avia Solutions in 2016 for Thanet District Council (#B attached) spell out the long lead-in time and huge financial resources that would be required to get Manston up and running again. RSP have not provided details of their financial backing or their business plan, and their Companies House accounts filings are not up to date, so we have no evidence that they have in place the levels of funding and detailed business and financial strategy that success would require. 1 3) ‘Severe adverse effects on quality of life’: RSP’s own PEIR documentation highlights the negative effects on quality of life that they cheerfully admit their proposals would have on residents in several areas, including Ramsgate. They allude to the effects of noise, recognising its negative impact on physical and mental health. Many national and international reports document the many and varied negative effects of living near an airport on residents’ health. A summary of these from The Independent in 2013 (‘Why living near an airport could be bad for your health’, #C attached) illustrates the damaging effects of noise on public health. Other adverse effects on health not mentioned by RSP would occur through air pollution (from large, heavy cargo planes, from the many HGVs that would be needed to shift goods away from the airport, and from the traffic jams that would inevitably result on Thanet’s inadequate roads), light pollution from night-time operations and the knock-on effects on health of disturbed sleep. Thanet is an area where health is already poor. Public Health England’s Local Authority Profile for Thanet, 2018 (#D attached) shows Thanet as one of the 20% most deprived authorities in England, with nearly a quarter of children living in low- income families. Life expectancy varies by economic status but overall is lower than the national average. Two of the most deprived wards in England lie directly under the proposed flight path. RSP’s plans, if approved, would have devastating effects on the health of my community, widening inequalities and reducing overall wellbeing. 4) Impact on young people: As a former teacher, College lecturer and head of a national lifelong learning charity, I am particularly concerned about the potential impact of a DCO on young people in Thanet – on their health, on their learning, on their job prospects and on their quality of life. We have seen that health and quality of life for all residents in Ramsgate and surrounding areas would be adversely affected if these proposals were to be realised – but the potential impact of a DCO on young people’s education and employment prospects would be just as grim. There are five schools directly under the proposed flight path. I was one of two teachers who attended the hearings at the Winter Gardens in Margate last month to speak about my experience of teaching near Heathrow. Every ten minutes we had to pause our lessons for several minutes while a plane went over. Over the course of a year, the children I taught missed out on up to one day a week’s teaching and learning. Unsurprisingly, their educational outcomes were often disappointing. In Thanet, educational outcomes are already poor. Strenuous efforts are being made in our schools to improve standards and inspire young people, and tiny improvements are starting to be seen. It would be deeply ironic if these were curtailed by noise pollution from a new cargo hub at Manston. 2 Some of those few residents who are inclined to support a DCO are doing so because they believe the airport will generate employment for our young people – but this is unlikely to be the case. Brendon Sewill in his 2009 report uncompromisingly entitled ‘Airport jobs – false hopes, cruel hoax’ (#E attached) argues that airports and their backers have a vested interest in persuading the public that airport expansion will bring jobs, but that their estimates are often wildly over-optimistic: “With the current recession, when thousands are losing their jobs, and millions fear that they may do so, any promise of more jobs is welcome. Thus the suggestion that a new or expanded airport will create more jobs is a sure way to attract support from the public and a fair wind from the planners. Naturally airport companies and airlines make the most of this. Yet because they have a commercial interest in magnifying the number of new jobs, their figures need careful examination. False hopes can prove a cruel hoax.” (p. 5) In cargo airports in particular, numbers of jobs are severely limited as many operations are automated. Meanwhile, Thanet’s expanding tourist industry is generating increasing numbers of jobs in the visitor economy. Visit Kent’s press release in January 2019 (#F attached) shows Thanet achieved the largest increase in day visitors in Kent in 2017, and that tourism now accounts for some 19% of total employment in the District. But these successes and the jobs that come with them are under threat from the DCO, as few tourists will wish to visit an area where quality of life is so severely compromised as even RSP accept it will be if their proposals come to fruition. A final irony is that RSP’s DCO application has prevented the legal owners of Manston airport site, Stone Hill Park Ltd, from implementing their proposals to set up a business park offering training, links with local Colleges, apprenticeships and high quality jobs – exactly the thing our young people need. If the DCO succeeds, this encouraging prospect will be gone for good; if it does not, it will have suffered at least a severe delay. For all these reasons I urge the Examining Authority to reject RSP Ltd’s application for a Development Consent Order. Tricia Austin Hartley CT11 8ED 3 Commercial Viability of Manston Airport AviaSolutions FINAL Report for Thanet District Council September 2016 Disclaimer of Liability This publication provides general information and should not be used or taken as business, financial, tax, accounting, legal or other advice, or relied upon in substitution for the exercise of your independent judgment. For your specific situation or where otherwise required, expert advice should be sought. Although Avia Solutions Limited or any of its affiliates (together, “Avia”) believes that the information contained in this publication has been obtained from and is based upon sources Avia believes to be reliable, Avia does not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed. Avia makes no representation or warranties of any kind whatsoever in respect of such information. Avia accepts no liability of any kind for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this publication. Copyright Copyright © 2016 the General Electric Company. All rights reserved. “GE,” “General Electric Company,” “General Electric,” GECAS”, “GE Capital Aviation Services Limited”, “AviaSolutions,” the GE Logo, and various other marks and logos used in this publication are registered trademarks, trade vice marks of the General Electric Company. No part of this publication or any trademark or trade name may be used without the written permission of the General Electric Company. September 2016 3 Table of Contents Glossary of Terms 6 1.1. Context 8 1.2. Scope and Limitations 8 1.3. Our Approach 9 1.4. Report Structure 9 1.5. AviaSolutions’ Qualifications 9 2.1. Summary 10 2.2. Background 10 2.3. Historic Performance of Manston Airport 10 2.4. Manston as an Overflow Airport for London 10 2.5. Conclusions 11 3.1. Introduction 12 3.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Victory Against All the Odds
    Victory Against All The Odds The story of how the campaign to stop a third runway at Heathrow was won “The victory was no fluke. It wasn’t a question of luck. It was the result of a clear strategy, a radical approach, daring tactics and an utter refusal by the campaigners to believe that we wouldn’t win.” Introduction This book is about a famous victory. It tells the tale of how a group of people took on the might of the aviation industry, international business and the UK Government and won. It is the story of how plans for the massive expansion of Heathrow Airport, including a third runway, were stopped. The book outlines the strategy and the tactics used. It is an inspiring story. It is a very human story. But it also contains valuable lessons for campaigners wherever they live and whatever their cause. Inevitably it is written from my perspective. It is the campaign through my eyes; told in my words. The ideal would have been for all the people involved in the campaign to have contributed to the book. That would have reflected the diversity of the campaign. But that wouldn’t have been practicable! In due course other books will be written about the campaign. Academics will analyse it. Historians will put it into perspective. More people will tell their stories. The local authorities and lawyers will have valuable insights to add. This book is essentially written from a campaigners’ perspective while events were still fresh in people’s minds. The opinions expressed, the words used, any errors that may have crept in, are all mine and should not be attributed to anybody else.
    [Show full text]
  • Destination London the Expansion of the Visitor Economy
    DESTINATION LONDON THE EXPANSION OF THE VISITOR ECONOMY EDITED BY ANDREW SMITH and ANNE GRAHAM Destination London: The Expansion of the Visitor Economy Edited by Andrew Smith and Anne Graham University of Westminster Press www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk Published by University of Westminster Press 115 New Cavendish Street London W1W 6UW www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk Text © the editors and several contributors 2019 First published 2019 Cover and back cover image: Diana Jarvis; Front cover image: Tristan Luker Print and digital versions typeset by Siliconchips Services Ltd. ISBN (Paperback): 978-1-912656-26-4 ISBN (PDF): 978-1-912656-27-1 ISBN (EPUB): 978-1-912656-28-8 ISBN (Kindle): 978-1-912656-29-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book35 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. This license allows for copying and distributing the work, provid ing author attribution is clearly stated, that you are not using the material for commercial purposes, and that modified versions are not distributed. The full text of this book has been peer-reviewed to ensure high academic standards. For full review policies, see: http://www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk/ site/publish. Suggested citation: Smith, A. and Graham, A. (eds.) 2019. Destination London: The Expansion of the Visitor Economy. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book35 License: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 To read the free, open access version of this book online, visit https://doi.org/10.16997/ book35 or scan this QR code with your mobile device: Contents Acknowledgements vii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Privileged Actors in Environmental Policymaking: the Historical Development of the Aviation Industry in the UK
    Privileged actors in environmental policymaking: the historical development of the aviation industry in the UK Lauren Roffey A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England September 2012 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived therefrom, may be published without the author’s prior, written consent. Abstract Through a theoretically informed examination of two cases fundamental to the growth of the aviation industry in the UK, this thesis aims to illuminate the mechanisms behind the industry’s oft-claimed position of privilege in environmental policymaking. It is claimed that historically the aviation industry has occupied such a position, manifest in tax breaks for fuel, delayed entry into the emissions trading scheme and continuing ability to secure permission for new airport development, all in the face of fierce opposition. However, the existing literature fails to adequately empiricise or explain the precise mechanisms behind its alleged position of privilege. This thesis focuses on the role of the UK state in arbitrating between rival interests in the historical development of the aviation industry in the UK. Two case studies are explored: the development of the third London airport at Stansted, and a new runway at Manchester. The former was characterised by delays and reviews, becoming a cause célèbre; the latter occurred more rapidly. Archival analysis and elite interviewing uncover fresh details of the two cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Arts and Refugees’
    ArtsandRefugees: History, Impact and Future Belinda Kidd, Samina Zahir and Sabra Khan Hybrid Arts Council England, London The Baring Foundation The Paul Hamlyn Foundation 2008 Hybrid Studio 1/105, Greenhouse, Gibb Street, Birmingham B9 4AA Telephone: 0121 270 6389 Mobile: 07946 579 655 Email: [email protected] Arts Council England, London 2 Pear Tree Court, London EC1R 0DS Telephone: 0845 300 6200 Email: [email protected] www.artscouncil.org.uk The Baring Foundation 60 London Wall, London EC2M 5TQ Telephone: 020 7767 1348 Email: [email protected] www.baringfoundation.org.uk The Paul Hamlyn Foundation 18 Queen Anne’s Gate, London SW1H 9AA Telephone: 020 7227 3500 Email: [email protected] www.phf.org.uk ISBN 978-1-906172-02-2 Designed and printed by: Luminous Frog www.luminousfrog.co.uk (4259) Foreword This report was commissioned by the Baring Foundation, Arts Council England, London and the Paul Hamlyn Foundation – three funding bodies with a shared interest in an area of arts practice we have called, for short, ‘the arts and refugees’. All of us have been making grants to support arts activity by and with refugees and asylum seekers for several years. As the field has grown in size and diversity, we have become increasingly conscious of the value of recording and analysing what has been happening. To this end, in spring 2007, following an open bidding process, we contracted Belinda Kidd, Samina Zahir and Sabra Khan, of Hybrid, to undertake the work. Their brief was to trace the history of the arts and refugees in the UK over the past 20 years, to identify trends in practice and funding, to report on the outcomes of this activity and to make recommendations for its future support.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    July 2008 | Volume VII, Issue III www.boeing.com/frontiers July 2008 Volume VII, Issue III BOEING FRONTIERS ON THE COVER: The London landmark Big Ben. SHUTTERSTOCK.COM PHOTO; COVER DESIGN BY BRANDON LUONG COVER STORY SHUTTERSTOCK.COM PHOTO BRILLIANT! | 12 Boeing has a wide-ranging presence in the United Kingdom. The company operates The Portal, a decision-support center in Farnborough, with partner QinetiQ. Many British entities contribute to the 787 Dreamliner airplane. And Boeing’s partners are helping develop technologies that support Boeing products. Here’s a look at why the UK matters to Boeing—and vice versa. FEATURE STORY | 42 A clean shave Welcome to the Boeing Portland facility in Oregon, where huge hunks of metal are machined into airplane parts. The rate at which this site strips away metal to form a new part is the baseline on which Boeing measures its performance against the machining industry—and Port- land has one of the best metal-removal rates in the world. BOEING FRONTIERS JULY 2008 3 Contents BOEING FRONTIERS Proud bird | 25 With a flawless combat deployment in Iraq that included 1,500 successful sorties and 3,600 flight hours, the Bell Boeing V-22 tiltrotor is proving itself to be what the U.S. Marines have said all along it would be: an aircraft that will transform military operations. Looking 30 years ahead | 26 Maintaining its technological edge is a matter the Super Hornet program at Boeing takes seriously. The program is following a strategy—the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet “Fight Plan”—that charts the course for improving this aircraft’s combat capability over the next three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Blossom Street, E1 Replacement Environmental Statement III NOVEMBER 2015
    BLOSSOM STREET, E1 Replacement Environmental Statement III NOVEMBER 2015 Application Documents Application forms CIL Additional Information form Revised Planning Drawings Addendum Design and Access Statement Planning Statement Replacement Environmental Statement I Replacement Environmental Statement II Replacement Environmental Statement III Replacement EnvironmentalStatement Non-Technical Summary Financial Viability Assessment Addendum Heritage Appraisal Archaeological Assessment Regeneration Statement Energy Statement Sustainability Statement Transport Assessment Statement of Community Involvement Blossom Street Warehosues Structural Method Statement Contents Appendix A Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion Appendix B Waste and Recycling Appendix C Traffic and Transport Appendix D Air Quality Appendix E Noise and Vibration Appendix F Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Pollution Appendix G Wind Microclimate Appendix H Water Resources, Drainage and Flood Risk Assessment Appendix I Archaeology Appendix J Built Heritage Blossom Street Appendix A – EIA Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion Replacement Environmental Statement Volume III Blossom Street Appendix A1 – Scoping Report Environmental Statement Volume III TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................1 1.1 Requirement for EIA.........................................................1 1.1.1 Update to the EU Directive – 2014/52/EU .......................1 Blossom 1.2 The Purpose of the EIA Scoping.....................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis: »Marketing Strategies for the Development of Wind Jet: Investments on Intercontinental Routes.«
    HAW – Hamburg University of Applied Sciences Department of Information Master of Arts in Information Sciences & Management Special Field: Media and Information Economics Supervisor: Dr. Prof. Ulrich Hofmann Co-Supervisor: Dr. Prof. Hardy Gundlach Master Thesis: »Marketing Strategies for the Development of Wind Jet: Investments on Intercontinental Routes.« Author: Lorenzo Servadei Matriculation No.: 1945842 Term: 5 Email: [email protected] Address: Kiwittsmoor 39, Hamburg 22417 Qualification: Master of Arts in Information Sciences & Management Date: 27/01/2011 Master Thesis “Marketing Strategies for the Development of Wind Jet: Investments on Intercontinental Routes” 1. PREFACE........................................................................................................................................................ 3 2. ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 5 4. LOW COST CARRIERS.............................................................................................................................. 6 4.1. SECURITY ............................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2. COST ADVANTAGES.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Aviation
    House of Commons Transport Committee The future of aviation First Report of Session 2009–10 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 2 December 2009 HC 125–II [Incorporating HC 499, Session 2008-09] Published on 11 December 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chairman) Mr David Clelland MP (Labour, Tyne Bridge) Rt Hon Jeffrey M Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr Philip Hollobone MP (Conservative, Kettering) Mr John Leech MP (Liberal Democrat, Manchester, Withington) Mr Eric Martlew MP (Labour, Carlisle) Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) Ms Angela C Smith MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hillsborough) Sir Peter Soulsby MP (Labour, Leicester South) Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Mr David Wilshire MP (Conservative, Spelthorne) The following were also members of the Committee during the period covered by this report: Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Sammy Wilson MP (Democratic Unionist, East Antrim) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/transcom.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Department External Information Services 16 May 2018
    Communications Department External Information Services 16 May 2018 Reference: F0003681 Dear I am writing in respect of your amended request of 17 April 2018, for the release of information held by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). You requested data on Air Operator Certificate (AOC) holders, specifically a complete list of AOC numbers and the name of the company to which they were issued. Having considered your request in line with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), we are able to provide the information attached. The list includes all the AOC holder details we still hold. While it does include some historical information it is not a complete historical list, and the name of the AOC holder is not necessarily the name of the organisation at the time the AOC was issued. If you are not satisfied with how we have dealt with your request in the first instance you should approach the CAA in writing at:- Caroline Chalk Head of External Information Services Civil Aviation Authority Aviation House Gatwick Airport South Gatwick RH6 0YR [email protected] The CAA has a formal internal review process for dealing with appeals or complaints in connection with Freedom of Information requests. The key steps in this process are set in the attachment. Civil Aviation Authority Aviation House Gatwick Airport South Gatwick RH6 0YR. www.caa.co.uk Telephone: 01293 768512. [email protected] Page 2 Should you remain dissatisfied with the outcome you have a right under Section 50 of the FOIA to appeal against the decision by contacting the Information Commissioner at:- Information Commissioner’s Office FOI/EIR Complaints Resolution Wycliffe House Water Lane Wilmslow SK9 5AF https://ico.org.uk/concerns/ If you wish to request further information from the CAA, please use the form on the CAA website at http://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?appid=24.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for the Development of the Central and Capital Cities and Regions'
    European Union Regional Policy and Cohesion îm , ΓΚνν ··· w m, Λ Regional development studies Prospects for the development *"5­_ of the centràhapcLçapital cities and regions R European Commission Τ R European Union Regional Policy and Cohesion Regional development studies The perspective development of the central and capital cities and regions European Commission Already published in the series Regional development studies 01 — Demographic evolution in European regions (Demeter 2015) 02 — Socioeconomic situation and development of the regions in the neighbouring countries of the Community in Central and Eastern Europe 03 — Les politiques régionales dans l'opinion publique 04 — Urbanization and the functions of cities in the European Community 05 — The economic and social impact of reductions in defence spending and military forces on the regions of the Community 06 — New location factors for mobile investment in Europe 07 — Trade and foreign investment in the Community regions: the impact of economic reform in Central and Eastern Europe 08 — Estudio prospectivo de las regiones atlánticas — Europa 2000 Study of prospects in the Atlantic regions — Europe 2000 Étude prospective des régions atlantiques — Europe 2000 09 — Financial engineering techniques applying to regions eligible under Objectives 1, 2 and 5b 10 — Interregional and cross-border cooperation in Europe 11 — Estudio prospectivo de las regiones del Mediterráneo Oeste Évolution prospective des régions de la Méditerranée - Ouest Evoluzione delle prospettive delle regioni del
    [Show full text]
  • Airportwatch Bulleting for May 2011
    AirportWatch bulletin 43 May 2011 A Critical Summer It may seem all quiet on the aviation front right now (except for those planes roaring over our heads!) but this summer is a critical one for the future of aviation. It is the period when both the Government and the Labour Party will be putting in place the key first building blocks of aviation policies. The Government is consulting on its Aviation Scoping Document which will provide the foundation for its policy on aviation. Labour is revising its aviation policy as part of a wider policy review. AirportWatch, along with its supporter groups, will be providing input to both the Government and the Labour Party consultations. Our conference on 18th June will focus on the Scoping Document. The victories against new runways at Heathrow, Stansted and Gatwick may mean that it is going to be very difficult for any government to promote new runways in the future. That is certainly the view of sections of the aviation industry. But what we will have to fight is the incremental growth in flights at airports across the country. It reminds me very much of the aftermath of the momentous campaign against new roads in the 1990s in which I was involved. It did mean that, for the most part, major new roads through pristine countryside or in urban areas, were off the agenda. It did not mean that traffic levels on the existing roads were curtailed. We failed to halt the incremental increase in traffic. The result is that our cities, towns and many of our villages are overrun by cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Importance of Air Transport and Airport Activities in Belgium
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kupfer, Franziska; Lagneaux, Frédéric Working Paper Economic Importance of Air Transport and Airport Activities in Belgium NBB Working Paper, No. 158 Provided in Cooperation with: National Bank of Belgium, Brussels Suggested Citation: Kupfer, Franziska; Lagneaux, Frédéric (2009) : Economic Importance of Air Transport and Airport Activities in Belgium, NBB Working Paper, No. 158, National Bank of Belgium, Brussels This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/144370 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences),
    [Show full text]