Case No M.7541 - IAG / AER LINGUS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case No M.7541 - IAG / AER LINGUS EN Case No M.7541 - IAG / AER LINGUS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Art 6(2) Date: 14/07/2015 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32015M7541 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14.07.2015 C(2015) 5026 final In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and PUBLIC VERSION other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. MERGER PROCEDURE To the notifying party: Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s), Subject: Case M.7541 – IAG/AER LINGUS Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation No 139/20041 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area2 1 OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of 'Community' by 'Union' and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision. 2 OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p.3 (the "EEA Agreement"). Commission européenne, DG COMP MERGER REGISTRY, 1049 Bruxelles, BELGIQUE Europese Commissie, DG COMP MERGER REGISTRY, 1049 Brussel, BELGIË Tel: +32 229-91111. Fax: +32 229-64301. E-mail: [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE PARTIES ............................................................................................................ 4 I.1. IAG .................................................................................................................... 4 I.2. Aer Lingus ......................................................................................................... 4 II. CONCENTRATION ................................................................................................... 5 III. EU DIMENSION ........................................................................................................ 5 IV. MARKET DEFINITION ............................................................................................ 5 IV.1. Overview of Parties' activities ........................................................................... 5 IV.2. Air transport of passengers ................................................................................ 6 IV.2.1. Origin and destination approach (O&D) ............................................. 6 IV.2.2. Distinction between groups of passengers .......................................... 7 IV.2.3. Markets for direct flights and indirect flights ...................................... 9 IV.2.4. Airport substitutability ....................................................................... 11 IV.2.5. Provision of access to flights of another carrier for connecting passengers in the context of interlining arrangements ...................... 23 IV.3. Maintenance, repair, overhaul ('MRO') ........................................................... 26 IV.4. Groundhandling ............................................................................................... 27 IV.5. Landside cargo handling .................................................................................. 28 V. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT AIR TRANSPORT OF PASSENGERS ............. 28 V.1. Methodology for calculating market shares .................................................... 29 V.2. Conceptual framework .................................................................................... 30 V.2.1. Treatment of joint ventures for the assessment of the Transaction ... 30 V.2.2. Competitive situation likely to prevail absent the Transaction ......... 31 V.3. Filters 31 V.4. Closeness of competition ................................................................................. 32 V.4.1. General approach to closeness of competition issues ........................ 32 V.4.2. Parties' and competitors' market positions ......................................... 33 V.4.3. Business models and brands .............................................................. 33 V.4.4. Existence of significant bases at route ends ...................................... 36 V.5. Airport congestion ........................................................................................... 36 V.5.1. London Heathrow .............................................................................. 37 V.5.2. London Gatwick ................................................................................ 39 V.5.3. London City ....................................................................................... 39 V.5.4. London Luton .................................................................................... 40 V.5.5. London Stansted ................................................................................ 40 V.5.6. London Southend ............................................................................... 41 V.5.7. Dublin ................................................................................................ 41 V.6. Direct/direct overlap routes ............................................................................. 43 V.6.1. London–Dublin .................................................................................. 43 V.6.2. Belfast–London ................................................................................. 52 2 V.6.3. Dublin–Madrid .................................................................................. 60 V.6.4. Dublin–Barcelona .............................................................................. 64 V.6.5. Dublin–New York ............................................................................. 69 V.6.6. Dublin–Chicago ................................................................................. 75 V.7. Direct/indirect overlap routes .......................................................................... 80 V.8. Indirect/indirect overlap routes ........................................................................ 87 V.9. IAG's position at London Heathrow post Transaction .................................... 89 V.10. Feed traffic issues ............................................................................................ 90 V.10.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 90 V.10.2. Commission's assessment .................................................................. 91 VI. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT GROUNDHANDLING ..................................... 113 VI.1.1. Horizontal relationships ................................................................... 113 VI.1.2. Vertical relationships ....................................................................... 115 VI.1.3. Conclusion ....................................................................................... 118 VII. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT LANDSIDE CARGO HANDLING .................. 118 VIII. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT MRO .................................................................. 119 VIII.1.1. Horizontal relationships ................................................................... 119 VIII.1.2. Vertical relationships ....................................................................... 121 IX. COMMITMENTS ................................................................................................... 125 IX.1. PROPOSED COMMITMENTS .................................................................... 125 IX.1.1. The slot commitments ..................................................................... 126 IX.1.2. The SPA commitments .................................................................... 127 IX.1.3. Other provisions .............................................................................. 130 IX.2. ASSESSMENT OF THE FINAL COMMITMENTS ................................... 131 IX.2.1. The slot commitments ..................................................................... 132 IX.2.2. The SPA commitments .................................................................... 136 IX.3. Overall conclusion on the Final Commitments ............................................. 142 X. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 142 3 (1) On 27 May 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A. ("IAG") acquires indirectly within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Aer Lingus Group, plc. ("Aer Lingus") by way of a public offer (the "Transaction"). (2) IAG and Aer Lingus are hereinafter referred to as the "Parties". 1. THE PARTIES 1.1. IAG (3) IAG is the holding company of each of British Airways Plc3 ("BA"), Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España, S.A.4 ("Iberia"), and Vueling Airlines, S.A.5 ("Vueling").6 The IAG airlines (BA, Iberia and Vueling) fly to around 200 destinations with approximately a further 200 destinations served under various codesharing relationships. (4) BA has its main hub at London Heathrow (LHR) and also operates bases at London Gatwick (LGW) and London City (LCY). Iberia's main hub is at Madrid Barajas (MAD). Iberia also has franchise arrangements
Recommended publications
  • Taking Britain Further Heathrow’S Plan for Connecting the UK to Growth
    VOLUME 1 Taking Britain further Heathrow’s plan for connecting the UK to growth #BritainsHeathrow Disclaimer This document has been prepared by Heathrow Airport Limited solely in response to an invitation from the Airports Commission. It should not be used for any other purpose or in any other context and Heathrow Airport Limited accepts no responsibility for its use in that regard Contents Volume 1 - Technical submission Contents ........................................................................................................................ 3 Foreword ....................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 11 Connecting for growth ................................................................................................................... 12 Listening to what our stakeholders say ........................................................................................... 18 Our vision for a world-class hub airport ........................................................................................... 20 Connecting all of the UK ................................................................................................................ 24 Building a sustainable Heathrow ..................................................................................................... 29 The deliverable solution .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JANUARY European Parliament Vote on Airport Charges (15 January)
    REVIEW www.airtransportnews.aero JANUARY European Parliament vote on airport charges (15 January) he European Parliament concluded its first reading on a proposed Directive on airport charges, initially the Directive will only incentivise conflicts between airlines and airports, resulting in uncertainty over infra - adopted by the European Commission a year ago. ACI EUROPE is appreciative of the European Parlia - structure investments and potentially delaying much needed capacity development. Olivier Jankovec added: T ment’s work to improve the proposal of the European Commission, but considers that serious concerns "That the Directive is silent on the need for airports to be incentivised to invest in time for the new facilities regarding fundamental issues remain. These include risking costly and damaging over-regulation as well as com - to match demand, is puzzling. It shows that the Directive not only remains imbalanced in favour of airlines but promising the ability of European airports to finance much needed infrastructure and capacity development. also fails to reflect that the interests of the airlines and that of the travelling public are not the same." Whilst the European Commission proposed to apply the Directive to all airports with more than 1 million pas - Responding to the vote of the European Parliament on Airport Charges, IACA is extremely disappointed that an sengers per year, the European Parliament increased this figure to 5 million, leaving States still free to apply opportunity to address the unbalanced relationship between the fully deregulated airline sector and their mo - the Directive to airports below this threshold. As most European airports now operate in a highly competitive nopolistic service provider (airports) has been missed.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Select Committee
    Response to the Assembly for Wales Enterprise and Business Committee Inquiry into the Future of Welsh Ports and Airports 1. About Flybe 1.1 Flybe welcomes the opportunity to submit a response to the Assembly’s inquiry into the future of Welsh ports and airports. Headquartered in Exeter, Flybe is proudly and determinedly a regional airline and is both Europe’s largest regional airline and the UK’s number one domestic airline. Employing around 3,300 staff, we currently operate 84 aircraft on 211 routes from 36 UK and 62 European airports (all routes on sale Jan ’12-Oct’12) in 18 countries and carried more than 7 million passengers in 2011. CAA statistics show that, during 2011, Flybe was responsible for 120,383 air movements, nearly 13% of the total for the UK. This made us the third largest airline in terms of departures from UK airports, behind only British Airways and Easyjet. 1.2 Flybe has established a comprehensive regional route network and our spread of airports is intended to offer customers a convenient point-to-point network operating from regional airports which are a preferable alternative to having to travel to more distant major hub airports. In addition, the domestic route network does not attempt to compete with surface transport where alternative road or rail options give journey times of three hours or less. As such, and because we offer three times more domestic routes than our nearest competitor, Flybe can legitimately claim to understand the needs of the UK’s regions better than any other airline.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Statement, Lynne Embleton, CEO, Aer Lingus
    Supplemental Aer Lingus Opening Statement to Joint Oireachtas Committee on Transport and Communications Committee – 22nd June 2021 Introduction Thank you for the opportunity to engage - once again - with the Transport and Communications committee. I will assume you have read the Aer Lingus opening statement which was originally due to be delivered on 2nd June. On this basis I won’t read that statement but everything in it still stands. I would however like to briefly supplement it to highlight some specific issues that need to be addressed urgently. Stobart Stobart Air informed Aer Lingus on 11th June that they were ceasing to trade with immediate effect resulting in the cancellation of all Aer Lingus Regional flights operated by Stobart Air. Stobart attributed this decision to the continuing impact of the pandemic which has resulted in almost no flying since March 2020. Aer Lingus stepped in immediately to operate six routes until at least the end of August and arranged for BA City Flyer to operate four of the routes. The provision of this replacement schedule has ensured that all impacted customers due to travel in the immediate term were offered alternative travel arrangements. Aer Lingus also confirmed that we are ready to operate the Dublin / Kerry route, subject to an appropriate PSO arrangement being put in place and that we are actively exploring options that would enable the provision of a Dublin / Donegal service. Aer Lingus and other key stakeholders in the aviation sector have consistently warned that Ireland’s 15-month long implementation of the most restrictive travel policies in Europe without sector specific supports being provided, represented a critical risk to aviation jobs and to connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • Download Bia Menu As A
    WELCOME ON-BOARD, AER LINGUS ARE DELIGHTED TO HAVE YOU FLYING WITH US. Welcome onboard To keep us all safe and well, we have made some changes to our inflight service: We’ve moved exclusively You can remove your face to card or contactless covering while you enjoy payments for all inflight your food and drinks. purchases. You can pay Please replace once you’re contactless up to €50, or finished. chip and pin up to €300. There may be limited We’ve updated our crew availability of some service procedures with products, we’re sorry if we hygiene and minimum don’t have your first choice. contact in mind. We plan to reintroduce fresh and hot food options to our menu soon. Breakfast Java Republic €3.00 filtered coffee Flahavan’s Porridge 100% Irish wholegrain oats. 50g €3.50 Hot Drinks €3.00each Lyons tea, Java Republic filtered coffee, Cadbury’s hot chocolate, Douwe Egberts Cappuccino Water Ballygowan still or sparkling 500ml €3.00 Gluten free each Soft Drinks €2.00 €3.00 NEW €2.00 €2.50 NEW Fruice apple juice Jaffo orange Fruice Juicy 200ml juice 250ml apple & blackcurrant 250ml €2.50each €1.50each NEW Soft Drinks 330ml Schweppes 150ml Coca-Cola, Coca-Cola Zero, Ginger ale, Slimline tonic or Sprite No Sugar or Fanta Tonic Water Snacks €3.00 €1.50 €2.50 The Primal Fulfil Protein The Foods Pantry Bar of Athenry Lemon & poppy seed Chocolate and salted Caramel rocky road 30g Vegan & gluten free caramel 55g 55g €2.00each Please refer to all product packaging for allergens Twix 50g KitKat 41.5g Dairy Milk 45g The Bar Magners Irish Cider 330ml Heineken 330ml Please refer to all €5.00each product packaging for allergens Demand can be high on certain routes.
    [Show full text]
  • 22Nd Biennial Symposium of the IMSSS
    22nd Biennial Symposium of the IMSSS CONVERSIONS AND LIFE PASSAGES THROUGH THE MIRROR OF MEDIEVAL PREACHERS The Dominican Casa de Espiritualidad y Ejercicios León, Spain / July 17-21, 2020 PRACTICAL INFORMATION LOCATION: The venue is located less than 2 km from León's airport. People flying in from outside of Spain should fly to Barcelona from where they can change to a direct flight from Barcelona to León. The street address of the Casa de Espiritualidad: Avda. de Astorga, 87 24198 La Virgen del Camino (LEÓN) Tel: (0034) 679 332 768 // 987 300 987 e-mail: [email protected] GETTING THERE: By airplane: León Airport: There are direct flights with Iberia Airlines from Barcelona (schedule not confirmed). Asturias Airport (Oviedo): 170km, about 2 hours from León. We are going to set up a bus transfer from the Airport of Asturias to the Casa de Espiritualidad y Ejercicios on the 17th of July around 12:00 and to the Airport on the 21st around 15:00. Madrid Adolfo Suárez Airport: 350 km. You will need to transfer from the Airport to the Chamartín Train Station by taking a regional train or a combination of the Metro and a regional train, both of which are located inside the airport terminals. Since the Madrid Airport has 4 terminals, we recommend that you consult the Google Maps instructions to find the best route: https://www.google.es/maps/dir/Madrid- Barajas+Adolfo+Su%C3%A1rez+Airport,+Av+de+la+Hispanidad,+s%2Fn,+28042+Madrid/Estacion+de+ Chamartin,+28036+Madrid/@40.4722831,- 3.7002189,12z/data=!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0xd4231d000000001:0x6e7725ea0f85ceef!2m2!1d- 3.5675982!2d40.4983322!1m5!1m1!1s0xd42293e290b606d:0x371c6af06d627cea!2m2!1d- 3.6825565!2d40.4718908!3e3?hl=en&authuser=0 By train: Renfe’s AVE (fast train) from Madrid (Chamartín Train Station): Several trains per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of the Development of Dublin Airport As a Hub
    Economic Impact of the development of Dublin Airport as a Hub Reliance Restricted 07 September 2018 | Final Ernst & Young Tel: + 353 1 475 0555 Business Advisory Services Fax: + 353 1 475 0599 Harcourt Centre ey.com Harcourt Street Dublin 2 Ireland Reliance Restricted 07 September 2018 Donal Moriarty Chief Corporate Affairs Officer Aer Lingus Hangar 6 Dublin Airport Dublin Economic impact of the development of Dublin Airport as a Hub Dear Donal In accordance with the terms of the engagement letter with you, we have assisted you in the assessment of the economic impact of the development of Dublin Airport as a Hub (“The Purpose”). This report sets out our assessment of these risks. Limitations of Scope We have not, except to such extent as you requested and we agreed in writing, sought to verify the accuracy of the data, information and explanations provided by yourselves, and you are solely responsible for this data, information and explanations. We have therefore relied on the information provided by you to be accurate and complete in all material respects. Use and distribution of this report Ernst & Young only accepts responsibility to the addressees of this letter on the basis of the engagement agreement and assumes no responsibility whatsoever in respect of or arising out of or in connection with the contents of this letter to parties other than yourselves. If other parties choose to rely in any way on the contents of this letter they do so entirely at their own risk. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Ernst & Young and its members, employees and agents do not accept or assume any responsibility or liability in respect of this report, or decisions based on it, to any reader of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • AIRCRAFT GROUND HANDLING and HUMAN FACTORS a Comparative Study of the Perceptions by Ramp Staff and Management
    NLR-CR-2010-125 Executive summary AIRCRAFT GROUND HANDLING AND HUMAN FACTORS A comparative study of the perceptions by ramp staff and management Problem area were sent to the target groups Human factors have been Management and Operational Report no. identified by the European personnel and interviews were NLR-CR-2010-125 Commercial Aviation Safety conducted afterwards to verify Team as a ground safety issue the results and to place them in Author(s) for which safety enhancement the right context. A.D. Balk J.W. Bossenbroek action plans have to be developed. Results and conclusions Report classification The results identified UNCLASSIFIED The objective of this study is to opportunities for improvement investigate the causal factors in the propagation of the safety Date which lead to human errors policy and principles, April 2010 during the ground handling substantiation of the principles process and create unsafe of a just culture, communication Knowledge area(s) situations, personal accidents or of safety related issues, the Vliegveiligheid (safety & incidents. ‘visibility’ of management to security) operational personnel, This document describes the standardisation of phraseology Descriptor(s) Human factors results of the study, performed on the ramp and awareness of Safety culture the potential risks of human by the Air Transport Safety Ground handling Institute of the National factors like time pressure, Aerospace Laboratory NLR in stress, fatigue and cooperation with the Civil communication. Aviation Authority of the Netherlands. Applicability The results of this study are Description of work considered applicable to all The study has been performed European ground service by investigating safety culture providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • IAG Results Presentation
    IAG results presentation Full Year 2019 28 February 2020 2019 Highlights Willie Walsh, Chief Executive Officer Continued progress against strategic objectives FY 2019 strategic highlights • Strengthen portfolio of world-class brands and operations − Announced planned acquisition of Air Europa, subject to regulatory approvals − British Airways new Club Suite on 5 aircraft (4 A350s, 1 B777) and in-flight product enhancements (amenities, catering, new World Traveller Plus seat, Wi-Fi rollout. Revamped lounges – Geneva, Johannesburg, Milan, New York JFK, SFO − Iberia Madrid lounge refurbishment and completion of premium economy long-haul rollout − Strong NPS increase by 9.5 points to 25.8, driven by British Airways and Vueling, target of 33 by 2022 − LEVEL expansion at Barcelona and roll-out to Amsterdam • Grow global leadership positions − North America traffic (RPK) growth of 3.6% − New destinations – Charleston (BA), Minneapolis (Aer Lingus), Pittsburgh (BA) − LEVEL – new route Barcelona to New York − Latin America and Caribbean traffic growth of 15.6% − Iberia - higher frequencies on existing routes − LEVEL – new route Barcelona to Santiago − British Airways – increased economy seating ex-LGW on Caribbean routes − Intra-Europe traffic growth of 3.8% - Domestic +10.1% (mainly Spain), Europe +2.2% − Asia traffic growth of 5.0% – British Airways new routes to Islamabad and Osaka, signed joint business agreement with China Southern Airlines • Enhance IAG’s common integrated platforms − Launched ‘Flightpath net zero’ carbon emissions by 2050
    [Show full text]